ofrp for sna public version final_15jan (1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
1/40
1United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
15 January 2014
Optimizing The Fleet Response Plan
ADM Bill Gortney
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
2/40
2United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Assess
EndsWays
RESOURCE
/ POLICY
ACCESS /
PROCURE
PRE-
INTRO
BASIC INTEGRATEDMAINT DEPLOY &
SUSTAIN
FRTP
SurfaceAviation
Submarines
C4ISR/CYBER
NECCWeaponSystem
OP/TAC HQs
Everyone is part of the Readiness Kill Chain
Everyone needs to know their place and role in the Readiness Kill Chain
Means and Ways must support the Endsour Deployability / Sustainment model, the FRP
CommonActions
SynchronizedTraining
Full WeaponSystem Ops
MeansPersonnelEquipmentSuppliesTrainingOrdnanceNetworks
InstallationsCommunity IndustryElectedLeaders
Governance / C2Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle
As of
08MAY13
Readiness Kill ChainPast, Present, Way Ahead
2
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
3/40
3United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) is a way to break down institutionalbarriers, increase understanding of readiness production, ensure acommon understanding of Navy readiness on the same page, and ensurethat policies, resources, and products deliver the right capability andreadiness for mission requirements.
Specifically, RKC is a repeatable methodology to identify readinessproduction barriers and root causes, followed by development of effectivestrategies and solutions to remove these barriers. These processes resultin complete assessment and presentation for decisions used to improveforward deployed readiness and resolve barriers in an informed and costeffective manner.
O-FRP is one example of implementation of the RKC. O-FRP uses the RKCapproach to analyze various stages of the processes for training,inspections, parts, maintenance and manning to achieve desired endstates.
What is RKC?
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
4/40
4United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
We will deliver credible capability for deterrence,
sea control, and power projection to deter or
contain conflict and fight and win wars.
Operate forward at strategic maritime
crossroads; Sustain our fleet capability through
effective maintenance, timely modernization, and
sustained production of proven ships and aircraft.
.
We must ensure todays force is ready for its
assigned missions. Maintaining ships and aircraft
to their expected service lives is an essential
contribution to fleet capacity
WARFIGHTING
FIRST
OPERATE
FORWARD
BE
READYWe will operationalize
the Sail ing Direct ionsthrough the Optimized
Fleet Response Plan
using the Readiness
Kill Chain (RKC)
CNO Guidance
We developed the Optimized Fleet Response Plan to
establish a more manning-balanced and sustainable
cycle
- CNO Position Report: 2013, p 3
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
5/40
5United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The CNOs tenets as outlined in his Sailing directions and reinforced in theNavigation Plan are clear.
The Readiness Kill Chain approach provides us a holistic construct, ormethodology, to ensure the Fleet is focused on warfighting forward and ready to conduct missions assigned and O-FRP is the answer to how
we balance those priorities.
CNOs Tenets
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
6/40
6United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP) has been developed toenhance the stability and predictability for our Sailors and families byaligning carrier strike group assets to a new 36 month training anddeployment cycle.
Beginning in fiscal year 15, all required maintenance, training, evaluations
and a single eight-month deployment will be efficiently scheduledthroughout the cycle in such a manner to drive down costs and increaseoverall fleet readiness.
Under this plan, we will streamline the inspection and evaluation process
and ensure that we are able to maintain a level of surge capacity.
O-FRP reduces time at sea and increases home port tempo from 49% to68% for our Sailors over the 36 month period. Initially focused on CarrierStrike Groups, O-FRP will ultimately be designed for all U.S Navy assetsfrom the ARG/MEU to submarines and expeditionary forces.
What is O-FRP?
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
7/407United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Fleet Response PlanProblem Statement
We have lost predictability For Sailors, families, industrial base
Readiness producers, and readiness consumers
Length does not accommodate maintenance and training or maximizeoperational availability
Misaligned CSG / DESRON Chains of Command Manning levels not aligned to the phases of FRP
Maintenance and modernization
Not executing on time / budget
Requires better synchronization
Underfunded spares accounts
Unconstrained inspection process
Lack of standardized Operational /Tactical HQ academic, synthetic, andlive training
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
8/408United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Potential Drivers toReadiness Production
C3
C5
C2
C4
IKE CSGFEB11
SEP13
C3
C5
C2
C4
HST CSGJUL10SEP13
Model Readiness Actual profile Anticipated profile
Cost Driver Maintenance Driven FRP Ineff iciency
Cost Driver Schedule Driven FRP Ineff iciency
C3
C5
C2
C4
NIM CSGFEB11SEP13
Cost Driver Maintenance and Schedu le Driven FRP Ineff iciency
Traditio nal Fleet FRP
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
9/409United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The previous slide graphically depicts inefficiencies.
The solid blue line represents our readiness model and the dashed line isreality for these three Strike Groups.
Each of these three profiles is unique and our generic profile is not reliablypredictive of the investment of our means and ways in this process.
IKE CSG faced maintenance challenges which delayed her work-ups and
deployment and then she conducted a second deployment after a shorthomeport visit.
HST CSG trained up and then delayed due to a change in presencerequirementswe banked her readiness during this delay.
NIM CSG was a combination of both maintenance and schedule delays.
Comparing a generic planning FRP profile to these CSGs profiles highlightsthe need to find a model that is more predictable and reliable in the planningprocess and ensures that we conserve scarce resources and money.
O-FRP establishes a framework to develop a predictive model that will driveeach CSG to look and execute a more similar FRP profile.
Understanding Potential Drivers toReadiness Production Slide
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
10/4010United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
DepSecDef-driven concept to generate 3.0-4.0 CSG Ao
7-7-7 plan (Deploy/Dwell/Deploy)
49 percent Homeport Time
Deployments are 39 percent of the FRP length
ECP Frame work: Provides a predictable FRP cycle
Extends/synchs CVN/CVW/SC FRP cycles to 36 months
Fixes CSG composition: Ships/aircraft/staffs remain aligned thru entire FRP cycle
Generates fully ready forces, trained to a single MCO certification standard
Establishes a stable and predictable maintenance plan
Maintenance interval remains constant
ECP concept ended Jan 13 due to sequester/POM fiscal limits
O-FRP Predecessor:Enhanced Carrier Presence
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
11/4011United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The following series of slides describe progress achieved in our effort tomanage Fleet wholeness across the Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) through theOptimized-Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP).
Managed Wholeness, is a term USFF coined to describe how we are
leading our forces through the tough fiscal turbulence expected over thecoming years.
Managed Wholeness
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
12/4012United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Weve started FY 14 under a Continuing Resolution Amendment at reducedfunding levels. Additionally, we are constrained by our current manpowerlevels and force structure. As a result, we have to carefully manage thewholeness of the Fleet with innovative cost saving measures that optimizereadiness at the reduced funding levels.
Current Fiscal Environment
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
13/4013United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Retains ECP framework / capacity with reduced global Ao (~2.0) 36 month FRP
Single 8-month deployment
Starts with HST CSG in Nov 2014
Enables delivery of:
Fixed CSG Composition
Aligned and stabilized CSG manning throughout the FRP
Stable maintenance plan Improved quality of work and enhanced quality of life
Embedded Electromagnetic Spectrum Maneuver Warfare and NavalIntegrated Fire ControlCounter Air
Forces trained to a single certification standard
Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP)
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
14/4014United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Optimized FRPLines of Effor t
Lineso
fEffor
t
AdvancedTraining
(USFF / CPF N7)
Maintenance/Modernization
(NAVSEA / NAVAIRUSFF / CPF )
Manning/Individual Training(OPNAV N1 /USFF)
CSGAlignment
(USFF / CPF N3)
FRP Length(USFF / CPF
OPNAV N3)
Unit Training
(TYCOMs)
Inspections(USFF/CPF N43)
Operational &Tactical HQs
(USFF / CPF N7)
Parts(USFF / CPF N41
OPNAV N8/N9)
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
15/40
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
16/40
16United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
What is AO?
AOis Operational Availability. Basically, this is the time a platform is employable.
This does not take into consideration OPTEMPO and PERSTEMPO.
The formula is the cycle length minus maintenance and training.
For example, in the 36-month O-FRP cycle, there are approximately 6 months
maintenance and 6 training. Therefore, AOis approximately 24 months.
AO = [ Cycle length(maintenance time and training time)]
AO = 36-(6+6) = 24
This does not mean that a Carrier Strike Group will be deployed for the entire
Operational Availability. Under O-FRP, deployment lengths are metered by ServiceQuality of Life factors. AOis simply a measure of when a platform is employable, andis used for planning both for rotational deployment and to determine surge capacityshould a National emergency arise.
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
17/40
17United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
FRP Length
36 month FRP cycle becomes the foundation upon which we generate CSGsready for deployment and provides maximum Ao for CSG presence/fundinglevel.
Under a sustainable O-FRP, a single 8 month deployment generates adeployed to FRP ratio (D/FRP) of 0.22 (or in other terms 5 CVNs can
generate 1.0 global presence) with the ability to go to 0.38 (or 3 CVNs togenerate a 1.0 presence) should resources ever become available.
These CSGs will be composed of 7-8, vice current 3-4, surface combatantswho will be aligned under a single DESRON and will aggregate for training
and certification.
Surface combatants deployment dates may vary slightly due to maintainingGlobal Force Management Allocation Plan (GFMAP) adjudicated presencerequirements: Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), SCAN EAGLE, and FIRESCOUT.
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
18/40
18United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
CSG Alignment
Iterative changes will be required in out years to complete
Problem:
CSG and Destroyer SquadronMisalignment
- Operational Control (OPCON) andAdministrative Control (ADCON)Chain of Command and FITREPS
- DESRON Commanders do notdeploy with their assigned SC
- CSGs deploy with SC frommultiple squadrons
Multiple Independent deployerCERTEX events required
Advanced training produceslesser qualification (MSO vs.MCO)
- DESRON SC FRP cycles not inalignment
- Capability mismatch with CSG
Solution:
Fixed CSG Composition
- C2 Aligned with FRP cycle- OPCON aligned with deployment
cycle
- SC schedules more predictable- BMD integrated within CSG- Surface combatant CMP aligned
with CVN- Cost effective, Major Combat
Operations Independentdeployers
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
19/40
19United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
CSG Alignment
When examining DESRON alignments in conjunction with O-FRP, we sawan opportunity to fix numerous discrepancies, such as wholesale surfacecombatant swap outs between CSG multiple deployments as well asintegrating BMD capability into CSGs.
O-FRP aligns surface combatant and CVN/CVW cycles to optimize
resources required to achieve deployment certification.
Simple administrative alignment near term achieves 90% DESRONalignment. 21 of 29 moves have been mapped out for TYCOM execution tosupport 4 CSGs.
USFF is changing DESRON assignments so that all CRUDES will be alignedto their CSGs starting with the GHWB CSG for their FEB 2014 deployment.
Ownership alignment also allows ISICs to begin transmitting Commandersintent to assigned units earlyoperational and professional expectations.
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
20/40
20United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Manning Wholeness
Personnel readiness standard 92/95/1 minimum deployment manning levels
Take risk in non-deployed units and postdeployment surge
Actions to achieve wholeness
Recruit/Access to meet demand
Manage Street to Fleet supply chain
Fund the Individuals Accounts
Define and prioritize critical operationalshore duty billets
Manage and sustain wholeness
Report and manage individual PERSTEMPO
Incentivize and retain quality sailors
Manage FIT/FILL risk ashore
Established PERS-454 to streamline LIMDUprocess
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
Fit Fill Fit Forecast Fill Forecast Fit Threshold
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
21/40
21United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
In the previous slide, we used 92/95/1 as our endstate. This is also knownas FIT / FILL / Critical NEC
The first number is FIT
This indicates that a commanding officer will have 92 percent of sailorsauthorized with the right skill sets
The second number is FILL
This number indicates that at least 95 percent of the required manning is onboard
The third and final number indicates that there is at least 1 sailor on boardthat has the qualifications for every critical Navy Enlisted Classification(NEC)
FIT/FILL/CRITICAL NEC
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
22/40
22United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The Fleet continues to face a fit/fill below the standard of 90/90/1 with anupward in trend of cross decks and diverts needed to maintain thatstandard.
After a TYCOM RKC review and a USFF N1 led Navy-wide working group, aCNO approved POAM was developed to increase the personnel readiness
target, set actions to achieve wholeness and manage and sustain the gains.
OPNAV N1 was given the lead to execute the POAM.
Manning
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
23/40
23United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
HST CSG Manning to O-FRP
77%
82%
87%
92%
97%
102%
No v-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb -14 Mar-14 Ap r-14 May-14 Ju n -14 Ju l-14 Au g-14
H S T C S G
S J A F i l l ( P a y b a n d )
FILL THRESHOLD SUP FILL JNY FILL APP FILL
77%
82%
87%
92%
97%
102%
Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14
H S T C S G
S J A F i t ( P a y b a n d )
FIT THRESHOLD SUP FIT JNY FIT APP FIT
CVN 75 H.S. TRUMAN 92% 90% 70% 70% 90 40
COMCARSTRKGRU 10 90% 90% 53% 53% 87 1
CG 72 VELLA GULF 90% 85% 73% 73% 85 20
CG 61MONT EREY 90% 89% 71% 71% 86 7
CG 56 SAN JA CINTO 89% 86% 73% 73% 85 17
DDG 80 ROOSEVELT 94% 90% 67% 67% 86 6
DDG 87 MASON 85% 83% 65% 65% 82 23
DDG 94 NITZE 85% 83% 65% 65% 82 23
CVW 3 104% 91% 45% 45% 87 1
VFA 32 90% 86% 75% 75% 89 12
VFA 37 94% 92% 64% 64% 89 0
VFA 105 90% 89% 80% 80% 89 6
VAW 126 88% 85% 72% 72% 83 9
VAQ 130 89% 87% 80% 80% 89 7
HSC 7 94% 91% 81% 81% 87 1
HSM 74 96% 89% 60% 60% 84 7
180
Current Month
Total
Required
Manning
Actions to
92% (based
on Current
Month)
UnitRCN Fit
%
RCN Fill
%
NEC Fit
%
Crit NEC
Fit %
BBD QoA
(New
Metric
Under
Review)
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
H S T F I L L / F I TRCN Fill Threshold
RCN Fill
RCN Fill Proj
RCN Fit Threshold
RCN Fit
RCN Fit Proj
NEC Fit
NEC Fit Proj
Crit NEC Fit
Crit NEC Fit Proj
BBD QofA
BBD P4 ProjAvailMaintenance Basic Integrated
Achievementof92%Fitand95%Fill Sus
COGNOS Data Source : Nov 5, 2013
0
20
40
N ov -1 3 De c- 13 J an -14 F eb -1 4 Ma r- 14 A pr- 14 Ma y- 14 J un -1 4 J ul -1 4 A ug -1 4
M a n n i n g A c t i o n s
Distribution Unplanned
TBD
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
24/40
24United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
CNO Availability schedules are set: Aligned with CRUDES assignment to CSGs
Stable, predictable and integrated maintenance and modernization plan
Proper availability planning
Allowance for timely port loading adjustments
Integrated with assessments
Aligns Surface Ship Class Maintenance Plan to 36 months to match CVNs
Modernization improvements:
Interoperable and aligned CSG/ARG C5I capabilities
Integrated SOVT test to include all associated supporting systems
Improved aircraft inventory management to fully support training plan
Adjust SFRM to 36 month FRP
Maintenance & Modernization
Stable, Predictable, Integrated Maintenance & Modernization
that aligns and synchronizes CSG capabilities
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
25/40
25United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Turning to maintenance and using the kill chain As is / To be construct,we found that maintenance was impacted by changes in schedules andfunding, and is constrained by port loading.
Thumb-rule used by maintenance providers is that costs go up by 3x forwork packages changes through mid-availability and as much as 8X forchanges in work packages from mid-to-late availability. So, this is a
significant cost driver. We also found that modernization is not aligned to the group and that there
is significant variance in combat systems. For instance, in the 62 shipArleigh Burke Class, there are 42 different configurations of only 8 majorC4I systems. Clearly, an interoperability challenge.
Configuration variance reduction is one element that will improve
maintenance and modernization execution.
Providing a stable and predictable FRP length with clear ownershipalignment to a particular CSG would alleviate many of these challenges.
Maintenance & Modernization
M i t & M d i ti
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
26/40
26United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Maintenance & ModernizationRKC Analysis
Commanders Intent Use a Readiness Kill Chain approach
Analyze the various stages of the end to end process
Ship/Submarine Maintenance and Modernization:
NAVSEA lead Drive Work Package development and Planning effort to be done
earlier
Integrate Class Maintenance Plan requirements with Modernization
Aircraft Depot Maintenance- NAVAIR lead
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
27/40
27United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Spares availability critical to readiness Stagnant/downward trends in key indicators drove action to get right parts
on the shelves
Outfitting Spares
Additional $51M added to outfitting spares accounts May13; minimal sparesbacklog
Outfitting spares funding green across Future Year Defense Plan
Fleet Shipboard Spares
Significant investments in AEGIS/BMD spares FY10-13
COSAL updates every 2 months since July 2012
Additional $21M investment in surface spares end of Fiscal Year 2013
Ship Construction Spares $14.6M added back to LPD-25 & LHA-6 programs end of Fiscal Year 2013
Surface Spares Wholeness
Coordinated Shipboard Allowance List (COSAL)effectiveness improving and expected to continue
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
28/40
28United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Inspections
28
INSPECTIONPERIOD III
Maintenance Basic Integrated Deployment
MCMA
INSURV MI / MCMA
FUTURE:
As-Is
To-Be
= Independent Inspections
INSPECTIONPERIOD I
INSPECTION
PERIOD II
MI
CNO designated USFF asExecutive Agent for FleetAssessment:- Oversee changes to
Inspections, Certifications,Assessment and Visits events
- Approval authority for new orexpanded requirements
- Standardize AssessmentCriteria
- Maximize training value
- Develop enduring process forcontinual review
- Lead senior advisory group toCNO on ICAV matters
PRESENT: 466 inspections
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
29/40
29United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
This diagram approaches inspection and assessment processes in the Asis: at top and To be on the bottom of the chart. The curves represent ageneric readiness curve and are sub divided horizontally by phase.
Our Fleet Action Working Group found that there are 466 differentinspections, certifications, assists and visits scattered across the FRP.Some of these are time based, some are conditions based and others are
policy or law. Many are, frankly, outdated. Developing an assessment and inspection continuum across the FRP will:
Optimize external assessment and inspection events to eliminate redundancy
Optimize assessment timing within the FRP
Standardize assessment and inspection requirements
Standardize expectations to minimize impacts to ships force personnel
Develop institutionalized process for continuous adjudication of futureinspections within the FRP.
Inspections
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
30/40
30United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Creating a Smarter INSURV
Reduced from 5 days to 3 days Commences on Tuesday vice Monday to reduce burden on crew
Improved Operational Risk Management Ships do not get underway before 0700 to enhance safety
Ship leadership afforded crew rest through improved scheduling of events andelimination of redundant and out dated requirements
Linked to Readiness Events Accepts TYCOM TSRA PMS data as INSURV data. This makes INSURV even
shorter (3 days or less)
Analyzes more data over broader period of time Collects TYCOM mid-cycle assessment data as INSURV data. This increases the
amount of data used to identify maintenance and readiness trends
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
31/40
31United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
EA For Fleet Assessments
PHASE ONEFAWG
PHASE TWOTYCOM/SYSCOM REVIEWS
PHASE FOURCENTRAL ICAV AUTHORITY
(CICAVA)
PHASE THREEFLEET CDR REVIEW
PHASE FIVESTEADY STATE
DELIVERABLES1. EA FOR ICAV DESIGNATED
COMPLETE2. REFINE/CONCUR WITH ICAV
CONCEPT - COMPLETE
3. COMMENT/CONCUR WITH ICAV
CHANGESSTAKEHOLDERS
REVIEWING CHARTER
4. All AIRFOR AND SURFOR ICAVs
TIED TO FOUR PHASES IN FRP
COMPLETE
5. AIRFOR AND SURFOR
IDENTIFIED ICAVS TO COMBINE
- COMPLETE
6. LINKAGE INSTRUCTION
DRAFTED AND TESTED ON JETBLAST DEFLECTORS (JBDs)
COMPLETE
7. SUBLANT JOINED FAWG
DELIVERABLES1. AS-IS ICAV
LISTCMP
2. PROPOSED
ICAV CHANGES
COMPLETE3. PROPOSED
TO-BE STATE
COMPLETE
4. ICAV CHARTER
DRAFTED
5. RESOURCESDELIVERABLES
1. DRAFT AND SIGN ICAV INSTRUCTION
2. ASSUME DUTIES FROM FAWG
3. PRIORITIZE ICAV CHANGES
4. DEVELOP ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
5. SURFACE SHIP INSURV
INSPECTIONS REDUCED TO 3.5 DAYS
APR 2014
DELIVERABLES1. CICAVA ACTS AS
THE GATEKEEPER
TO SYNCHRONIZEALL ICAV EVENTS
2. CICAVA EXTENDS
PROCESS TO
OTHER FRP-
DRIVEN ENTITIES
DELIVERABLES1. SIGN CHARTERTYCOMS
HAVE REVIEWED WITH
ONLY MINOR CHANGES
2. DESIGNATE CICAVA
CONTAINED WITHIN
CHARTER
3. STANDUP CICAVA
4. RESOURCE CICAVA
5. INSURV MESSAGE
6. INSURV HAS ACTION TO
LEAD LINKAGEESTABLISHMENT BETWEEN
TYCOM AND INSURV
INSPECTIONS
IPR
25 SEP 13
18 OCT 13
ECD
14 FEB 14
ECD
1 OCT 14
CICAVA MAKES CHANGESDELETE, MOVE CONSOLIDATE,
AND OPTIMIZE ICAV EVENTS
(MOVE FROM AS-IS TO TO-BE)DELIVERABLESBLUECOMPLETED
REDNOT COMPLETED
17 JAN 14
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
32/40
32United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
O-FRP Training
Carrier, air-wing, and all surface combatants training aligned
ALL units trained to one standard
People and equipment ready for training at the end of maintenance
Basic unit training
Retains training time entitlement
Integrates inspection, certification, and continuous maintenance requirements
Advanced unit and integrated group training
Standardized Group Sail
More efficient training schedule
Standardized training Fleet-wide
Synthetic
CVW FALLON
Live
CVW
CRUDES
CVNAcademic
GroupSail
TSTA /FEP
14 Weeks
TSTAWCC
A-A ARP
CVN
TIER 1 - MobilityREAD-6/ CMAV
TIER 2 - Unit Tactical
A-G ARPCVW
CRUDES
Non Skid
24 Weeks
TYCOM Tasking
Operational Level to Tactical Level
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
33/40
33United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Operational Level to Tactical LevelHeadquarter Alignment
Aligned and standardized Navywarfighting staffs from operational to
tactical level
Functions based on Mission Essential
Tasks aligned from Combatant to Tactical
Commander
Personnel assigned with right skill sets to
meet HQ fit
Interoperable systems between
Operational and Tactical Level HQ
Standardized and codified staff training
and exercise program
OptimizedFleet Response Plan will provide alignedand standardized Operational and Tactical Level Headquarters
NCC
CombatantCommander
CSG, CVW, DESRON, PHIBRON
Standardization
Alig
nment
CTFCTG
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
34/40
Optimized FRP
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
35/40
35United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Lineso
fEffort
Optimized FRPLines of Effor t
Foundation to O-FRP ---------- CVN/CVW There Now ---------- SC w/HST
HST
HSTIOC MAY 14
HST
HST
HST
HST / GHWB / TR by MSGAUG 13
GHWBIOC AUG 13
TRIOC SEP 13
GHWB VIN TR
GHWB VIN
GHWB VIN
GHWB VIN
HST GHWB VIN TR
OL/TL HQs(USFF / CPF N7)
AdvancedTraining
(USFF / CPF N7)
Unit Training(TYCOMs)
CSGAlignment
(USFF / CPF N3)
FRP Length(USFF/CPF
OPNAV N43)
Inspections(USFF/CPF N43)
Parts(USFF / CPF N41OPNAV N8/N9)
Maintenance/Modernization
(USFF / CPF N43/N6)
Manning/Individual Training(USFF / OPNAV N1)
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
36/40
36United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Starts with maintenance cycle in Nov 14. CRUDES will be aligned by HST
CSG FRP start (NOV 2014), pending rework of class maintenance plans byNAVSEA.
Inspections begin approximately 1 month prior to Basic training phase
Manning is aligned to Basic training phase to gain efficiency in trainingaudience participating in all of work-ups
Integrated training occurs in Nov 15
CSG alignment has already started by message in Aug 13 for HST / GHWB /and TR. The first CSG to be aligned for deployment will be GHWB in Feb14.
HST CSG staff will receive pipeline and fleet training for OL/TL alignment in
May 14.
First O-FRP CSG: TRUMAN
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
37/40
37United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
The other CSGs officially enter O-FRP at the maintenance phase: GHWB
May 14, VINJul 15, TRDec 15
Where able, we have instituted elements of O-FRP as early as possible.GHWB conducted elements of Integrated training by conducting a new GRPSail event.
TR is conducting increased integrated training b/c of NIFC-CA. CSGalignment for HST / GHWB / TR is de facto complete after the first ADCONshift message in August 13 (CCSGs already briefing their to be units atupdate briefs)
Follow On Carrier Strike Groups
R di Kill Ch i
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
38/40
38United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Assess
EndsWays
RESOURCE
/ POLICY
ACCESS /
PROCURE
PRE-
INTRO
BASIC INTEGRATEDMAINT DEPLOY &
SUSTAIN
FRP
2. O-FRP.. OL/TL HQs. Advanced Training........................................................................................................... Unit Training.... Inspections... Parts.. Maintenance... Manning.
CSG Alignment FRP Length.
Ma
nagingWholeness
MeansPersonnelEquipmentSuppliesTrainingOrdnanceNetworks
InstallationsCommunity IndustryElectedLeaders
Governance / C2Drives integration & synchronization vertically across weapons systems & horizontally across the readiness lifecycle
1. Cost to Own..
3. Surge Capacity.....
Readiness Kill ChainNavy -Wide Ap proach to Managing Who leness
It takes everyone to manage Fleet wholeness across the ReadinessKill Chain
Optimized FRP
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
39/40
39United States Fleet Forc es United States Pacif ic Fleet
Lineso
fEffor
t
AdvancedTraining
Maintenance/Modernization
Manning/
IndividualTraining
CSGAlignment
FRP Length
UnitTraining
Inspections
Operational &
Tactical HQs
Optimized FRPTake Aways
Parts
Standardize & align NCC, CSG and Warfare CDR training tracks
Combine JTFX / C2X; standardize Group Sail; NIFC-CA & EMMW
ISIC-led, CSG-wide aggregated training with a predictable schedule
Consolidate to specific inspection periods aligned to the FRP
RKC methodology to ensure spares are available when needed
Stable, predicable, synchronized execution of Maint & Modernization
Sea Centric Manning; Incentivize and Retain Quality Sailors
C2 aligned with FRP cycle
36 Month Fleetwide introduction begins with TRUMAN CSG in Nov 2014
-
8/13/2019 OFRP for SNA Public Version Final_15Jan (1)
40/40
UNCLASSIFIED