of the 286,00 people living in nagasaki at the time of the blast, 74,000
DESCRIPTION
The Impact of Special Relativity in Nuclear Physics: It’s not just E = Mc 2. Of the 286,00 people living in Nagasaki at the time of the blast, 74,000 were killed and another 75,000 sustained severe injuries. E = Mc 2. On August 9, 1945. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Impact of Special Relativity in Nuclear Physics: It’s not just E = Mc2
Of the 286,00 people living in Nagasaki at the time of the blast, 74,000 were killed and another 75,000 sustained severe injuries.
E = Mc2On August 9, 1945
San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant
E = Mc2
Nuclear Generation in California, 1960 through 2003Million Kilowatt Hours
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/states/statesca.html
About 13% of California’s electrical consumption came from nuclear power
E = Mc2
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/05/south_asia_pakistan_and_india_earthquake/html/6.stm
Radioactive decay supplies a significant fraction of the internal heat of the Earth’s mantle. Convection currents driven by this heat cause active plate tectonics.
E = Mc2
It would be difficult to find an area of physics which has not been profoundly influenced by Special Relativity.
Guiding Principles of Special Relativity
1) The speed of light c, is a constant for all observers in inertial reference frames.
2) The laws of physics must remain invariant in form in all inertial reference frames.
These two principles lead us to the Lorentz transformation, which gives us the translation table between two inertial reference frames O and O’.
z
y
x
ct
z
y
x
ct
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
0 0
'
'
'
'
O O’x x’
cv /
v
21/1
Both O and O’ see the event but they give different coordinates.
The Lorentz transformation shows that there are conserved quantities which have the same value measured in any inertial reference frame. These quantities are calculated from their respective 4-vectors.
22222222 ''')'()(
quantity conserved theand
),,,(
zyxctzyxct
zyxctx
Another extremely important 4-vector is the 4 momentum.
.)(')(
0, p' framerest sparticle' in the and
)'(')(
and
),(),,,(
22222
2222
mcEpcE
cpEpcE
pcEcpcpcpEp zyx
.)()( 2222 mcpcE
Since we want to describe microscopic systems we know we need to use quantum mechanics. The equation for E gives us two possible approaches to make a relativistic quantum mechanics. Call the wave function:
Emcpc
Emcpc2
2222 )()(
The first equation is the Klein-Gordon equation. The second is the Dirac equation.
K-G
equation
Dirac
equation
Particles Bosons Fermions
Negative energy states?
Yes antiparticles
Yes antiparticles
Basis states +E and –E if interactions are present
+E and –E if interactions are present
,1,0 ,2/3,2/
Under what circumstances should we expect relativity to be important in quantum systems?
An approach that focuses on the condition v/c <<1 is too limited. Q. Relativity gives us fermions and Fermi-Dirac statistics and the whole structure of matter relies on the nature of the fermions.
Q. Relativity explains low energy aspects of the microscopic structure of matter, such as atomic spectra.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/sodzee.html
Sodium D lines from the spin-orbit splitting of the 3p atomic state to the 3s1/2 state.
Relativity is essential in understanding atomic spectra, even when the energy of the state is a small fraction of the electron mass.
E(3p-splitting)/mec2 = 4 x 10-9 .
Relativistic Q.M. gives the right size of the spin-orbit splitting in atoms.
The Spin-Orbit Interaction
L
S
L
S
In the atom the S. O. interaction is generally attributed to the interaction of the electron’s magnetic moment and an induced magnetic field from the electron’s motion in the field of the nucleus.
However, it is a general property for any interacting fermion to show spin-orbit behavior. This is a consequence of Lorentz invariance (G. Breit, 1937).
How to make interacting fermions.
Emcpc 2 Dirac equation for a free particle.
)1
,( 0 Vc
VV
Introduce a 4-potential, Vand a scalar S.
Dirac equation for an interacting particle.
EVSmcV
cpc o)()
1( 2
For nuclei modern calculations generate a potential averaged over a scalar meson field and a vector meson field plus some smaller scalar and vector fields.
Relativity and Nuclear Structure
L = 1, p state in 11C,
ESO
Strong spin-orbit forces are seen in nuclei.
E(1p-splitting)/mpc2=2 x 10-3.
Velocity dependent forces are required in nuclear structure and are natural outcomes of a relativistic treatment using scalar and vector mesons
The magnitude of the nuclear spin-orbit potential is correctly given by a relativistic Q. Field theory using scalar and vector mesons.
e
e
eNZANZA
eNZANZA
)1,1(),(
)1,1(),(Radioactive decay and anti-particles
CSULA Proposal to search for other predicted relativistic effects in nuclei
1) Look for true nucleon-nucleon correlations as distinct from apparent correlations due to nonlocalities induced by relativistic effects.
3) Exploit the (e,e’p) asymmetry predicted by relativistic theories as a new observable for nuclear states.
2) Look for explicit evidence of the negative energy states in 208Pb.
Impulse Approximation limitations to the (e,e’p) reaction on 208Pb
- Identifying correlations and relativistic effects in the nuclear
medium
THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY
K. Aniol , B. Reitz, A. Saha, J. M. Udias
Spokespersons
Hall A Collaboration MeetingJune 23, 2005
K.Aniol, Hall A Collaboration Mtg., June 23, 2005
THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY
K.Aniol, Hall A Collaboration Mtg., June 23, 2005
(ii) Momentum distributions > 300 MeV/c
This was explained via long-range correlations in a nonrelativistic formalism [Bobeldijk,6], but also by relativistic effects in the mean field model [Udias,7].
I. Bobeldijk et al., PRL 73 (2684)1994
xB ≠ 1
E. Quint, thesis, 1988, NIKHEF
J. M. Udias et al. PRC 48(2731) 1994
J.M. Udias et al. PRC 51(3246) 1996
Excess strength at high pmiss
Negative Energy States- Complete Basis)ˆ)cos(ˆ)sin()sin(ˆ)cos()(sin()( 0 ztytxtRtR
The particle is in an orbit of radius R0 and constant angular velocity in 3 dimensions.
If we ignore the Z dimension and use a truncated basis of two dimensions in X and Y, we would interpret the particle’s projected motion in the XY plane as that of a harmonic oscillator.
rdt
rd 22
2
Asymmetry in the (e,e’p) reaction
peAeA '21
BF
BF
NN
NNA
q is the momentum transferred by the scattered electron.
qee
'
We detect protons knocked out forward and backward of q to determine the asymmetry A.
ATL in 3He, 4He and 16O
If relativistic dynamical effects are the main cause responsible for the extra strength, a strong effect on ATL would be seen.
There is a notable difference in ATL between 3He and 4He due to the density difference and in 16O. 16O: ATL
p1/2
p3/2
M. Rvachev et al. PRL 94:12320,2005
E04-107,2004J. Gao et al. PRL84:3265, 2000
THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY
K.Aniol, Hall A Collaboration Mtg., June 23, 2005
ATL in 208Pb
THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY
K.Aniol, Hall A Collaboration Mtg., June 23, 2005
ATL in 208Pb
Heavy Metal
Collaboration