oct applications in optometry · oct applications in optometry chuck aldridge, o.d. ... fdt, swap ,...

14
5/18/16 1 OCT Applications in Optometry Chuck Aldridge, O.D., M.B.A. Fellow American Academy of Optometry Member of Optometric Glaucoma Society Aldridge Eye Institute Burnsville, NC The content of this course was prepared independently by myself without commercial influence from members of the ophthalmic industry. I am on the Speaker Bureaus of Allergan, Alcon and Optovue. I am a clinical investigator for Bausch & Lomb and CIBA. I am on Clinical Advisory Board for TearLab. However, I have no direct financial or proprietary interest in any company, product or service mentioned in this presentation. I have not received commercial support in any form (honorarium, etc.) for this presentation. The content and format of this course will be presented without commercial bias and will not claim superiority of any commercial product or service. COMMERCIAL DISCLOSURE Mandatory Slide OCT Get the right one for the right reason! Which OCT? Time Domain Fourier (Spectral) Domain Time Domain vs. Spectral “Cirrus OCT has better scan quality than Stratus OCT, especially in glaucomatous eyes. In cases with good- quality scans, the sensitivity and specificity, and AUCs were similar. The best agreement was in the global average RNFL classification. The widths of limits of agreements exceed the limits of resolution of the OCTs.” Javier Moreno-Montañés, Natalia Olma, et al. Cirrus High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Stratus Optical CoherenceTomography in Glaucoma Diagnosis. IOVS; Jan 2010, Vol 51, no. 1, 335-343 FOURIER DOMAIN OCT ADVANTAGE FD OCT has twice the depth resolution as TD OCT (5 microns vs 10 microns) Allows imaging and segmentation of ganglion cell layers Faster speed also allows for greater density of sampling points and reduces artifacts from eye-movements (FD OCT has 26,000 A scans/sec vs Stratus TD OCT with 400 A scans/ sec)

Upload: vandang

Post on 06-Jul-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

5/18/16

1

OCTApplicationsinOptometry

ChuckAldridge,O.D.,M.B.A.

FellowAmericanAcademyofOptometry

MemberofOptometricGlaucomaSociety

AldridgeEyeInstitute

Burnsville,NC

•  The content of this course was prepared independently by myself without commercial influence from members of the ophthalmic industry.

•  I am on the Speaker Bureau’s of Allergan, Alcon and Optovue. I am a clinical investigator for Bausch & Lomb and CIBA. I am on Clinical Advisory Board for TearLab. However, I have no direct financial or proprietary interest in any company, product or service mentioned in this presentation.

•  I have not received commercial support in any form (honorarium, etc.)

for this presentation. •  The content and format of this course will be presented without

commercial bias and will not claim superiority of any commercial product or service.

COMMERCIAL DISCLOSURE Mandatory Slide

OCTGettherightonefortherightreason! WhichOCT?

• TimeDomain

• Fourier(Spectral)Domain

TimeDomainvs.Spectral“CirrusOCThasbetterscanqualitythanStratusOCT,

especiallyinglaucomatouseyes.Incaseswithgood-

qualityscans,thesensitivityandspecificity,andAUCs

weresimilar.Thebestagreementwasintheglobal

averageRNFLclassification.Thewidthsoflimitsof

agreementsexceedthelimitsofresolutionoftheOCTs.”

JavierMoreno-Montañés,NataliaOlma,etal.CirrusHigh-DefinitionOpticalCoherenceTomographyComparedwithStratusOpticalCoherenceTomographyinGlaucomaDiagnosis.IOVS;Jan2010,Vol51,no.1,335-343

FOURIERDOMAINOCTADVANTAGE

•  FDOCThastwicethedepthresolutionasTDOCT(5microns

vs10microns)

•  Allowsimagingandsegmentationofganglioncelllayers

•  Fasterspeedalsoallowsforgreaterdensityofsampling

pointsandreducesartifactsfromeye-movements(FDOCT

has26,000Ascans/secvsStratusTDOCTwith400Ascans/

sec)

Laura
Highlight
Laura
Typewritten Text
6/11/16
Laura
Typewritten Text
Course 6

5/18/16

2

EvaluationoftheCorneaandAnteriorChamber

PachymetryMapsKeratoconus Analysis Thickness Parameters

B-Scans

Thickness Map color coded

6 mm diameter average thickness values by region Central circle 0-2mm Middle circle 2-5 mm Outer circle 5-6 mm

Power Calculations

Keratoconus

IMAGINGANDMEASUREMENTOFTHECORNEA

AngleCalculationsMEASUREDOCCLUDABLEANGLE

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

3

Pre-CataractNarrowAngle

Post-CataractOpenAngle

OCTandGlaucoma

HowDoTheyCompare?

FDT,SWAP,flickerperimetry,andOCTareall

usefulmethodsfordiscriminatingbetweenhealthy

eyesandeyeswithearlyglaucoma.Amongall10

OCTparameters,NFLThasthehighestsensitivity

fordetectingearlyglaucomatouschangesinGS

patients.Nomoto,Hiroki;Matsumoto,Chota;Takada,Sonoko;Hashimoto,Shigeki;Arimura,Eiko;Okuyama,Sachiko;

Shimomura,Yoshikaz.DetectabilityofGlaucomatousChangesUsingSAP,FDT,FlickerPerimetryandOCT.Journalof

Glaucoma.18(2):165-71,Feb2009.

OVERLAYOFTHERNFLANDGCC(OS)WITHFDOCT

pRNFL

GCC

DENDRITICSHRINKAGE

Normal Ganglion cells (Primate) Glaucoma model Ganglion cells (Primate)

•  The first structural change from glaucoma was a shrinkage of the ganglion cell dendritic fields

GANGLIONCELLLOSSINTHEMACULA

•  Histologicstudieshaveshownganglioncelllossinthe

macula

•  Desatniketal.(1996)foundmacularganglioncellsare

lostinearlyglaucoma

•  Yuceletal.(2003)showedlossofcellsinthe

parvocellularlayersoftheLGNimplicatingcentral

ganglioncellloss

Desatnik H, Quigley HA, Glovisnky Y. J Glaucoma 1996; 5: 46-53. Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL, Gupta N. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003; 22:465-481

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

4

TDOCTSTUDYLIMITATIONS

•  MajordisadvantageinthesestudiesisthatTD

OCTtypicallymeasuresfullretinalthickness

only(doesnotisolateganglioncells)

•  TDOCTdoesnothaveenoughdepth

resolutiontoimageandsegmenttheganglion

cellsaccuratelyandreliably

RETINALGANGLIONCELLSEXTENDTHROUGHTHREERETINALLAYERS

RNFL

Ganglion cell bodies

Ganglion cell axons

Ganglion cell layer

Inner plexiform layer

Inner nuclear layer

Outer plexiform layer

Outer nuclear layer

IS / OS Junction

RPE Layer

Ganglion cell dendrites

Ganglion cell complex (GCC)

GCC is: •  Nerve Fiber Layer – Ganglion cell axons •  Ganglion cell layer – Cell bodies •  Inner-Plexiform Layer - Dendrites

IMAGINGTHEGCCWITHTHEFDOCT

ILMNFLGCLIPLINLOPLONLPRIS/OSRPEChoriocapillarisandchoroid

BloodvesselGCC Full Retina Thickness

GCC is inner retinal layers •  Nerve Fiber Layer – Ganglion cell axons •  Ganglion cell layer – Cell bodies •  Inner-Plexiform Layer - Dendrites

DIAGNOSTICACCURACY:GCCVSTDOCTFULLRETINATHICKNESSINMACULA

•  Tanetal.(2009)foundtheGCC(FDOCT)was

significantlymoreaccuratefordetectingglaucoma

comparedtofoveathickness(fullmaculathickness)

withStratusTDOCT

•  Morietal.(2010)alsoshowedGCCwassignificantly

moreaccuratethanfullmaculathicknesswithTDOCT

Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT et al. Ophthalmology 2009; 116:2305-2314. Mori S, Hangai M, et al. 2010; J Glaucoma, in press.

DIAGNOSTICACCURACY:GCCVSMACULAVFSENSITIVITYINMACULA

•  GCCTdeterminedbySD-OCT(RTVue-100)

showedastatisticallysignificantstructure-

functionassociationwithmacularVF,andthe

strengthoftheassociationwasgreaterthanthat

ofthempRNFLwithmacularVFinthesuperior

centralVFarea.

JungHwaNa,MichaelKook,etal.Structure-FunctionRelationshipoftheMacularVisualFieldSensitivityandthe

GanglionCellComplexThicknessinGlaucoma.IOVS.June14,2012.11-9401

DIAGNOSTICACCURACY:GCCVSFDOCTRNFL

•  Raoetal.(2010)foundGCChadsimilaraccuracylevels

asRTVueFDRNFL

•  Seongetal.(2010)foundsimilarresults

•  Kimetal.(2010)foundAROCvalueswerehigherfor

RNFLvsGCCinagroupofadvancedglaucoma

patients,butGCCvalueswerehigherthanRNFLina

groupofearlyglaucomapatients

RaoHL,ZangwillLM,WeinrebRNetal.Ophthalmology2010;inpress.SeongM,SungKR,ChoiEH,etal.InvestOphthalmolVisSci2010;51:1446-1452.KimNR,LeeES,SungGJ,etal.InvestOphthalmolVisSci2010;inpress

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

5

FDOCT:GCCVSDISCVSRNFL

•  Huangetal.(2010)comparedthediagnosticaccuracyfor

GCC,opticdisc,andRNFLfromtheRTVue

•  AROCforRNFLwashighest(AROC=0.92),withGCCsecond

(AROC=0.86),andverticalC/Dratioaclosethird(AROC=

0.854)

•  Theyfoundtheaccuracyimprovedwhenthey

combinedallthreestructuresinanLDF(AROC=0.97)

Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Mesiwala N, Kao A, Lin S. J of Glaucoma 2010 Epub ahead of print

GCCSUMMARY•  GCCthicknesscorrelateswellwithvisualfields

•  Highlyreproducible

•  Morereproducibleandmoreaccuratefor

detectingglaucomathanmaculathickness

withTDOCT

•  SimilaraccuracyfordetectingglaucomaasFD

OCTRNFLthickness

GCC:Arriveatthesceneofthecrimebeforethecrime

InadditiontoppRNFL

thickness,themGCC

thicknesscouldbea

structuralparameterfor

detectingpreperimetric

glaucoma

Takagi,SeijiT.MD*,†;Kita,YoshiyukiMD,PhD*,†;Yagi,FumihikoMD,PhD*,†;Tomita,Goji

MD,PhD*,†MacularRetinalGanglionCellComplexDamageintheApparentlyNormal

VisualFieldofGlaucomatousEyesWithHemifieldDefects

Takagi.JournalofGlaucoma.June/July2012.Vol21.Issue5.p318.325.

“ProofinthePudding”CaseStudies

CaseHistory(2005)•  57YOM

•  Struggleswithdiabeticcontrol

•  Hashadsomelasertxinprior2-3years

•  CDalwayslarger;butsome?change

•  Matrixscreeningfieldhasnewfinding

•  IOPalwaysbeeninupperteens(17-19)

•  InitiateglaucomaevaluationforNTG

•  Sidenote:Approximately2009patientstartedCPAP

OpticNerveEvaluation(alsosomebackgrounddiabeticretinopathy)

Someexudates

ModerateCupping

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

6

MatrixScreeningFieldMarch2005

MatrixComprehensiveFieldMarch2005

Inferiordefects(superiorOCT?) Superiordefects(inferiorOCT?)

OS OD(ODworsethanOS)

OCTScanApril2005

OD–Inferiordamage(ConsistentwithSuperiorFieldDefect)

OS-SuperiorDamage(ConsistentwithInferiorFieldDefect)

ODworsethanOS(consistentw/VF)

RNFLProgressionEvaluation(OD)02/09-04/12

Stable

RNFLProgressionEvaluation(OS)02/09-04/12

Stable

GCCProgressionEvaluation(OD)02/09–04/12

Startingtodrop?(RepeatOCTsooner)

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

7

GCCProgressionEvaluation(OS)02/09-04/12

FairlyStable

7YearsLater(SDTOCT)April2012

Caveat

•  RNFLchangesoccurearlierthanfieldchanges

•  GCCchangesoccurearlierthanRNFL

•  EarlyprogressivechangeinGCCisEARLY!

•  RepeatOCTsoonertoverify

OCTandRetinalStuff

Patient Data •  74 yo wf

•  C/O vision stress

•  Non contributory history

•  Baby aspirin + vitamins

•  VA With Contact Lenses OD 20/30 OS 20/40

•  CCT 510/516 IOP 14/15

•  Long standing VM traction OS and ERM OU with a Hx of

refusing intervention

FundusPhotoswithMoreAtrophyODThanOS

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

8

StratusTimeDomainImages

NotBad….BUT

PVDERM

VMTraction

LOOKATSPECTRALDOMAIN!

Andtheproblemis….

•  Examination12.14.11(29YOF)

– BCVA:OD:PL-0.50x082 20/20

OS:-0.25-1.00x097 20/20

-  IOP:13,13

-  EOM’s,CF,PupilsWNLOU

-  C/D:OD.3/.3ROS.3/.3R

-  PosteriorSegmentWNLOU

Andtheproblemis….

•  29y/ocaucasianfemale(6monthslater)

•  Reports“blackspotincenterofvisioninbotheyesforoneweek”

•  POH:unremarkable

•  PMH:unremarkable

•  SocialHistory:Cigarettes1pack/dayx10years

Andtheproblemis…•  Examination6.12.2012

–  BCVA:ODBCVA:OD:PL-0.50x082 20/40*

OS:-0.25-1.00x097 20/40*

*(VAw/eccentricviewing)

-  IOP:15,15

-  EOM’s,CFWNL.PupilsRoundReactive,OD>OSwithOD

reactionmoresluggishthanOS

-  C/D:OD.3/.3ROS.3/.3R

-  PosteriorSegment:

12.14.2011

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

9

6.12.2012

What’sGoingonHere? It’sHereToo!

DIAGNOSIS?

•  SOLARMACULOPATHY

•  PATIENTWATCHEDTHEECLIPSEFOR

ABOUT30MINUTES!

“RoutineExam”

•  BVA20/20ODand20/25-OS(69YOF)

•  PosteriorIOLOUwithclearcapsules

•  BVA20/20OU1yrearprior

•  PERRLA•  Hypertensive,BP118/79

•  Fundus–unremarkable

•  Brotherhadamaculahole

•  UnexplainedacuitydecreaseOS????

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

10

OSRetina MatrixScreeningVFVFatvisittoday VFdone1.5yearprior

Maculaintact?

WhatisThis?

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

11

NormalMacula?

Thinning

AlookwithCirrus

OSwithCirrus

Thereitis

AndThinning!

FAofOS

•  FAshowsdelayedreturn

inferotemporal

•  Enoughtimethatany

edemaandhemresolved

onBIO

•  Nocentral“window

defect”relatedtomacula

hole

DIAGNOSIS?

•  OldBRVOinOS

•  OS-posteriorhyaloidfacepulledawayfrom

fovea.Demonstratesasmallremnantof

hyaloid.Mayhaveabitofretinashowingon

OCT(possiblywithsomeNFL),butNOhole

•  NeedtomonitorODnow

BlurryVisionCase

Lefttheirpreviousdoctorbecause“blurry

vision”notgettingbetter

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

12

SawanotherODapp.1yr.ago•  “blurryatdistanceandnearabout6months”

•  39YOF

•  BVA20/20ODand20/30OS

•  Ta11/10@2:45pm

•  TraceguttataOU

•  Fundus-unremarkable

•  Gaveartificialtearandscheduledtore-refractwith

binoculartesting

Re-Refraction(1monthlater)

•  BVA20/20-ODand20/40OS

•  Plan:PrescribeRxwithBase-inprism

OneYearLater

•  “Gotrecallfrompriordoc,butvisionstillblurry

andwantedanotheropinion”

•  BVA20/20ODand20/50OS

•  CD.35/.35

•  PERRLA

•  AC-unremarkable

FundusEvaluationODOS

Alittlediscpallor?

MatrixFields

NAME: Mcdowell, Angela

ID: 118039

LEFT EYE

PUPIL DIAMETER: 8mm VISUAL ACUITY: AX: W/o rx

30

N-30-5 FDT Screening

TEST SPEED: NORMAL

BOTH

DOB: 08-07-1973 [38]

DATE: 02-14-2012 10:43 AM

RIGHT EYE

PUPIL DIAMETER: 8mm VISUAL ACUITY: RX: W/o rx

TOTAL DEVIATION

30 30

D P>=5° /0

P<5%

1:1P<2%

P<1%

TEST DURAT ION : 1 :32 FIXAT ION TARGET: Central

TEST DURAT ION : 0 :36 F I XAT ION TARGET : Central

F IXATION ER RS : 0/3 (0 %) F IXAT ION E RRS : 0/3 (0 %)

FALSE POS ER RS : 0/3 (0 %) FALSE POS ERRS : 0/3 (0 %)

NOTES : NOTES :

30

Aldridge Eye Inst.

419 East Main St.

Burnsville, NC

SW: M02.03.01[01 S06.00.03[0] P06.00.03[0] TID: 18768.20050310154 (R1)

Humphrey Matrix with Welch Allyn Frequency Doubling Technology

ODRNFLOSRNFL

RNFLdropout360ALittleThinHereToo?

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

13

ODGCCOSGCC

Don’tLookGood

Whatdaheckisgoingon?

•  NeuroReferral:MRIdone

•  2.1x1.6cmplanumsphenoidalemeningiomaw/

meningealinvolvementofinferiororbitalgyrus,

deformationofolfactorynerves,encasementof

ant.cerebralartery,A1/A2segments,ontheleft,

right,invasionofleftcavernoussinus,and

stenosisofleftopticcanal

SurgeryPerformed

•  Compressionofleftopticnerveneeded

•  BVA20/40ODandNLPOS

GrowYourContactLensPracticewithOCT

Mini-Scleralbecome“mainstream”•  Scleraldesign–usefulfor“sickeyes”.Havealotofvault

(fluidlayer),reducedO2

•  Mini-scleral-

1.  SimilarsizeandcomforttosoftCL

2.  Minimalfluidlayer,greatO2

3.  Greatfordryeyepatients,toricandmultifocals

4.  UseofOCT“takestheartrightoutofit”withrespectto

fitting

MINI-SCLERALCONTACTS

Usethemeasuretooltoaccuratelydeterminevault288microns

Laura
Highlight

5/18/16

14

MINI-SCLERALCONTACTS

291microns

MINI-SCLERALCONTACTS

Edgeevaluation-  Howdoesitland?-  Clearlimbus?

MINI-SCLERALCONTACTS

THANKYOU!

Laura
Highlight