oct 29 planning committee meeting
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
1/167
Vision: The City of Greater Sudbury is a growing,
world-class community bringing talent, technology and a
great northern lifestyle together.
Vision: La Ville du Grand Sudbury est u
croissante de calibre international qui ras
les technologies et le style de vie except
AgendaPlanning Committeemeeting to be held
Monday, October 29th, 2012
at 5:30 pm
Tom Davies Square
Ordre du jour
runion du
Comit de planificatioqui aura lieu
lundi 29e octobre 2012
17h 30
Place Tom Davies
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
2/167
Planning Committee Meeting
Monday, October 29, 2012
Tom Davies Square
COUNCILLOR DAVE KILGOUR, CHAIR
Andr Rivest, Vice-Chair
4:45 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
COMMITTEE ROOM C-11
To deal with: One Acquisition/Disposition of Land Matters: Sale of Vacant Land - M
Street, Sudbury
5:30 P.M. OPEN SESSION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBER
Council and Committee Meetings are accessible. For more information regarding acc
please call 3-1-1 or email [email protected]
DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF
MATTERS ARISING FROM THE "CLOSED SESSION"
At this point in the meeting, the Chair of the Closed Session, Councillor Rivest, will ri
t th lt f th Cl d S i " Th C itt ill th id
PLANNING CO
AGENDA
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
3/167
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth andDevelopment regarding Application for temporary use by-law to permit outdoor
storage and parking of construction and mining equipment, 3024 Falconbridge
Highway, Garson - Falcon Hotel Ltd.
(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)
2. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and
Development regarding Application for rezoning in order to permit the use ofthe property as a Contractor's Yard for the storage of equipment and civil
construction material, 7275 & 7289 Estaire Road, Sudbury - Nolcar
Corporation.
(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)
3. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and
Development regarding Applications for Official Plan Amendment and rezoningin order to permit a new elementary school, Frood Road, Sudbury - Sudbury
Catholic District School Board.
(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)
4. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and
Development regarding Applications for rezoning and subdivision approval in
order to create a 163-lot subdivision to be developed for single and doubleresidential uses, MacMillan Drive, Val Therese - 630411 Ontario Inc.
(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)
Letter of concern received January 12, 2012 from John Cerilli, area resident;
Letter of concern dated August 5, 2009 from Tal B. Lyons, area resident;
Letter of concern dated August 9, 2009 from Graham and Karen McNally, area
residents;
Letter of concern dated August 10, 2009 from Mike White, area resident;
Letters of concern dated August 17, 2009 and November 8, 2012 from Tim and Brenda
Young, area residents;
Letter of concern dated August 18, 2009 from Ed Ducharme, area resident;
Letter of concern dated April 4, 2011 from Kristi Arnold, Dalron Construction Limited.
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
4/167
Each and every matter of business contained in the Consent Agenda is recorded separately in the minu
meeting.)
ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS
C-1. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and
Development regarding Consent referral request for Consent Applications
B92/2012 to B94/2012, 5174 Desmarais Road, Hanmer - Diane & Marcel
Boulais.
(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)
C-2. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and
Development regarding Request to rescind Deeming By-law 91-18,
Subdivision M-1003, Scenic View, Lot 10, Concession 3, Township of Neelon
Zulich Enterprises Limited.
(RECOMMENDATION PREPARED)
CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION ONLY
C-3. Report dated October 16, 2012 from the General Manager of Growth and
Development regarding Draft Provincial Policy Statement Review.
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY)
(The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing has recently released a draft version
of an updated Provincial Policy Statement for review and comment. The purpose of
this report is to provide Planning Committee with brief overview of the draft PPS, thecommenting period and next steps.)
ADJOURNMENT
LISA OLDRIDGE, Deputy City Clerk
LIZ COLLIN, Committee Assistant
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
5/167
Runion du Comit de planification29 octobre 2012Place Tom Davies
CONSEILLER DAVE KILGOUR, PRSIDENT(E)
Andr Rivest, Vice-prsident(e)
16H 45 SANCE HUIS CLOS DU COMIT DE LA PLANIFICATIONSALLE DE RUNION C-11Objet : traiter de une acquisitions / alinations de terrains
17H 30 SANCE PUBLIQUE DU COMIT DE LA PLANIFICATIONSALLE DU CONSEIL
Les runions du Conseil municipal et des comits sont accessibles. Pour obtenir prenseignements au sujet de l'accessibilit, veuillez composer le 3-1-1 ou faire parvenir
l'adresse [email protected].
DCLARATION DINTRTS PCUNIAIRES ET LEUR NATURE GNRAL
QUESTIONS DCOULANT DE LA SANCE HUIS CLOS
Le prsident de la sance huis clos, le conseiller Rivest, se lve maintenant et en prrsultats. Le Comit examine ensuite les recommandations.
COMIT DE PLANI
ORDRE DU JOUR
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
6/167
AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES1. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16
octobre 2012 portant sur Demande de rglement municipal dutilisationtemporaire pour permettre lutilisation dune aire dentreposage lextrieur etdun stationnement pour du matriel de construction et dexploitation minire,3024, route Falconbridge, Garson Falcon Hotel Ltd.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)
2. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16octobre 2012 portant sur Demande de rezonage afin de permettre une courdentrepreneur pour entreposer de lquipement ainsi que du matriel deconstruction civile, 7275 et 7289, chemin Estaire, Sudbury.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)
3. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16octobre 2012 portant sur Demandes de modification du Plan officiel et derezonage afin de permettre une nouvelle cole lmentaire, chemin Frood,Sudbury Sudbury Catholic District School Board.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)
4. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du 16octobre 2012 portant sur Demandes dapprobation de rezonage et delotissement afin de crer un lotissement de 163 lots pour logements individuelset logements doubles, promenade MacMillan, Val-Thrse 630411 OntarioInc.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)
Lettre de proccupation date du 12 janvier 2012 partir de John Cerilli;
Lettre de proccupation date du 5 aot 2009 partir de Tal B. Lyons;Lettre de proccupation date du 9 aot 2009 partir de Graham et Karen McNally;Lettre de proccupation date du 10 aot 2009 partir de Mike White;Lettre de proccupation date du 17 aot 2009 et 8 novembre 2009 partir de Tim etBrenda Young;Lettre de proccupation date du 18 aot 2009 partir de Ed Ducharme;L tt d ti d t d 4 il 2011 ti d K i ti A ld D l
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
7/167
lordre du jour des rsolutions. Toutes les questions daffaires lordre du jour des rsolutions sont inssparment au procs-verbal de la runion)
RAPPORTS DE GESTION COURANTS
C-1. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du16 octobre 2012 portant sur Demande de renvoi de la demandedautorisation B92/2012 B94/2012, 5174 rue Desmarais, Hannmer - Diane Marcel Boulais.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)
C-2. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du16 octobre 2012 portant sur Demander d'annuler Jugeant le rglement 91-18de la subdivision M-1003, Vue panoramique, lot 10, concession 3, canton deNeelon - Entreprises Zulich limite.(RECOMMANDATION PRPARE)
CORRESPONDANCE TITRE D'INFORMATIONC-3. Rapport du directeur gnral de la croissance et du dveloppement, dat du
16 octobre 2012 portant sur Examen de la Dclaration de principesprovinciale provisoire .(A TITRE D'INFORMATION)
(Le ministre des Affaires municipales et du Logement a rcemment publi uneversion actualise de la Dclaration de principes provinciale, aux fins dexamen et
dobservations. Le rapport en question vise prsenter les observations de laDivision des services de planification sur la version provisoire de la dclaration enquestion.)
LEVE DE LA SANCE
LISA OLDRIDGE, Greffire municipale adjointeLIZ COLLIN, Assistante du comit
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
8/167
Request for Decision
Application for temporary use by-law to permit
outdoor storage and parking of construction and
mining equipment, 3024 Falconbridge Highway,
Garson - Falcon Hotel Ltd
Presented To: Plan
Presented: Mon
Report Date Tue
Type: Pub
File Number: 751
Recommendation
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by
Falcon Hotel Ltd. to amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City of
Greater Sudbury Zoning By-law with respect to those landsdescribed as Part of PIN 73494-0149, Part of Parcel 7464 SES,
Lot 6, Concession 1, Township of Garson in order to permit the
temporary outdoor storage and parking of construction and
mining equipment in part of the rear yard of the subject lands in
accordance with Section 39 of the Planning Act for a temporary
period of three years subject to the following:
1. That the temporary outdoor storage and parking ofconstruction and mining equipment shall only be permitted on
that portion of the lot located within 57 metres of the rear lot line
being the southerly boundary of Part 1, Plan 53R-5883.
2. That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner
shall have constructed an opaque fence along the boundary of
the abutting lands to the east that are zoned R2-2, to the
satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services.
3. That the temporary by-law shall expire on November 20, 2015.
STAFF REPORT
Signed By
Report Prepared By
Glen Ferguson
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Reviewed By
Eric Taylor
Manager of Developm
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Paul BaskcombDirector of Planning S
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by t
Doug NadoroznyChief Administrative O
Digitally Signed Oct 1
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
9/167
To amend By-law 2010-100Z being the Zoning By-law for the City of Greater Sudbury in o
temporary use for a maximum period of three years.
Proposal:
The application is to permit the temporary outdoor storage and parking of construction an
equipment in a portion of the rear of the subject lands for a temporary period of three yea
Official Plan Conformity:
The subject lands are designated Mixed Use Commercial in the Official Plan for the City o
Sudbury. All uses are generally permitted within the Mixed Use Designation except for He
uses. Section 20.5.3 of the Official Plan permits Council to pass by-laws under the Plannithe temporary use of land, buildings, or structures, in defined areas and for prescribed pe
any purpose set out therein that is otherwise prohibited by the Zoning By-law. Conformity
policies of the Official Plan is not required for the passing of such a by-law.
Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses:
The subject lands are located on the south side of Falconbridge Highway between Eva S
Avenue in the community of Garson. The lands have a lot area of 0.87 ha (2.16 acres) w
70 m (229.66 ft) of frontage onto Falconbridge Highway. The portion of the lands that are
application are in the rear yard of the subject lands behind the existing hotel building. The
by the applicant depicts an approximate 2,804 m2 (30,185 ft2) area in the rear yard that i
purposes of storing construction and mining equipment for a temporary period of three ye
Surrounding uses are mixed with urban residential, general commercial and extractive ind
located in the general area. The portion of the lands to be used for temporary storage imm
"M5", Extractive Industrial zone (pit) to the south and other general commercial uses on th
Falconbridge Highway.
Departmental & Agency Comments:
Building Services
The current zoning by-law does not permit outdoor storage on any lot that is abutting a re
would require a 2.2 metre opaque fence around the entire perimeter of the subject area. W
that shelving over 2.2 m high not be permitted.
Development Engineering
No concerns.
Drainage
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
10/167
received by the Planning Services Division.
Planning Considerations:
Background
Staff has previously been advised by the applicant in July 2012 that the subject lands are
drilling and mining company for the temporary storage of mining and construction equipm
ATVs, drill rigs, front end loaders and trucks. Employees of the drilling and mining compa
provided with temporary accommodations at the Falcon Hotel which is also located on the
The applicant at this time also indicated that historically the area in question has been use
area for the hotel use. Staff would further note that By-law Enforcement has recently atten
lands with respect to the proposed use and the applicant is now seeking approval for a te
by-law in order to permit said use to remain on the lands.
Official Plan
Section 20.5.3 of the Official Plan permits Council to allow for the temporary use of land f
period of time. Staff notes that while conformity with the land use policies of the Official P
for the passing of such a by-law, it is important to consider the potential impacts that said
may have on abutting land uses. The following section of the report examines the issue o
compatibility as it pertains to the proposed temporary storage of mining and construction Land Use Compatibility
The lands to the immediate south are zoned for extractive industrial use and it is not antic
use conflict would occur between this use and the storage of mining and construction equ
to the immediate east are undeveloped residential lands which have been draft-approved
since September 4, 1990. This draft approval was recently further extended to Septembe
construction of the subdivision were to proceed, any further extensions of the temporary u
be re-examined in the future as the potential for land use conflict might arise. In order to possibility that residential development proceeds within the next three years on the subdiv
staff are recommending that an opaque fence be erected along the boundary of the R2-2
[approximately 22m (72 feet)] prior to the enactment of the amending by-law. To the eas
the temporary use would be adequately buffered from residential properties by existing co
development. The temporary use is adequately buffered from residential properties to the
is located behind the existing Falcon Hotel building and set back in excess of 80 m (262.4
Falconbridge Highway.
Subject to the requirement for fencing along the R2-2 zone boundary, staff are satisfied th
conflicts are envisioned should the temporary use be approved for a period of three years
Summary
Th l d tl b i d t t i i d t ti i t E l
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
11/167
storage and parking of construction and mining equipment in the rear of the subject lands
with Section 39 of the Planning Act for a temporary period of three years.
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
12/167
O'NEIL
FALC
ONBR
IDGE
EVA
PILOTT
E
LAWRENCE
RODNEY
M5
P FD
I
C2
OSP
FD
R2-2
R1-5
R2-2
R2-2
R2-2
R1-5
R1-5
R1
R2-2OSP
R3.D60
R1
-5
R2-2
C2
R3.D6
0
C1
6
9
5
68
19
55
22
50
60 37
58
20
29
24
26
2827
65
26
46
41
10
38
16
47
16
52
21
20
32
42
11
33
12
173183
241
435
218
529
229
184
195
200
451
253208
439
600
645
240
617489
713535295
211
519
207
215
647 623
248
501
648
643
445
256
611 609
291
186
228
3098
2938
29202956
30713079
2946
29622901
2850
2932
2968
3035
29832991
2836
30002992
2887
315
2974
3024
28692859
3144
3000
3098
3098309830983098
309830983098
3098
2902
2877
2925
3045
2908
2982
2851
2872
HEINO
ORELL
RAVINA
HERIN
E
VIEW
Growth and DeveloDepartment
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
13/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
14/167
Photo 1 EXISTING HOTEL AND RESTAURANT BUILDING
LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT LANDS AS VIEWEDFROM FALCONBRIDGE HIGHWAY LOOKING SOUT
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
15/167
Photo 3 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT AS VIEWED FROMSTORAGE AREA IN THE REAR PORTION OF THESUBJECT LANDS LOOKING NORTH TOFALCONBRIDGE HIGHWAY
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
16/167
Photo 5 VACANT RESIDENTIAL LANDS AND EXTRACTIVE
INDUSTRIAL LANDS TO THE EAST AND SOUTH OFTHE SUBJECT LANDS
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
17/167
Photo 7 EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THEEAST OF THE SUBJECT LANDS VIEWED FROMFALCONBRIDGE HIGHWAY LOOKING EAST
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
18/167
Request for Decision
Application for rezoning in order to permit the use
of the property as a Contractor's Yard for the
storage of equipment and civil construction
material, 7275 & 7289 Estaire Road, Sudbury -Nolcar Corporation
Presented To: Plan
Presented: Mon
Report Date Tue
Type: Pub
File Number: 751
Recommendation
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by
Nolcar Corporation to amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City ofGreater Sudbury Zoning By-law by changing the zoning
classification of lands described as PINs 73470-0196,
73470-0204, 73470-0301, Parcels 21422, 22947, and 37428
SES, Lot 5, Concession 2, Township of Dill from "C2", General
Commercial and "RU", Rural to "RU(S)", Rural Special subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the only permitted use shall be a contractor's yard.2. That prior to the enactment of the amending by-law the owner
shall enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement with the City,
which amongst other matters, shall address the screening of
outdoor storage areas and landscaping adjacent to Estaire Road.
STAFF REPORT
Applicant:
Nolcar Corporation
Signed By
Report Prepared By
Alex Singbush
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Reviewed By
Eric Taylor
Manager of Developm
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by thPaul Baskcomb
Director of Planning S
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by t
Doug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative O
Digitally Signed Oct 1
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
19/167
Proposal:
The application proposes the use of the property as a Contractor's Yard for the storage o
civil construction material to support aggregate activity in the area. At this time no new b
proposed.
Official Plan Conformity:
The subject property is designated as Rural in the Official Plan. Section 5.2.5 of the Offici
Industrial/Commercial, indicates that some limited rural industrial/commercial uses are pe
areas, particularly those activities that provide rural economic benefits that are balanced w
the natural environment and the agricultural resource base.
Policies related to rural industrial/commercial uses include:
1. Rural industrial/commercial uses are generally resource-based and may include agricu
industrial/commercial uses, and forestry.
2. Pits and quarries are permitted in appropriately zoned areas.
3. Rural industrial/commercial sites are to be located with adequate separation distances
areas, and provide proper buffering and landscaping along Arterial Road frontages. Entra
to Secondary Arterial and Local Roads, and no temporary structures, outside storage or s
be visible from the frontage of abutting roads. All such development is subject to rezoning
control.
4. New resource-related industries should not impact the natural resource base. Rural ind
uses must generate limited amounts of wastewater and minimize land use conflicts.
Planning Staff is satisfied the application conforms to the Official Plan and site plan contro
Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses:
The subject property is comprised of three parcels located on the west side of Estaire Ro
Horseshoe Lake Road and Bruce Street, and was previously the site of the Stop 69 resta
station. Currently zoned "C2", General Commercial and "RU", Rural, the lands are approx
(9.0 ac.) in area with approximately 184 m (604 ft.) frontage on Estaire Road and a depth
198 m (650 ft.). A metal clad shop building and a Quonset hut occupy the property. The
site is wooded, a substantial area is cleared with a gravel surface, and there is a chain lin
along the Estaire Road frontage.
The property is bounded to the north, south and west by properties zoned "RU", Rural an
the opposite side of Estaire Road, by properties zoned "RU", Rural, "C2", General Comm
"RU(56)", Rural Special zoning that permits warehousing. There are quarries and gravel
the site is proximate to Tait Constructions main office on Bruce Street
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
20/167
buildings, septic systems, wells etc. within the permit control area, and prior to the placing
alterations.
2. New buildings, septic systems etc. must maintain a minimum setback of 14.0 metres fr
property line. Wells must maintain a minimum setback of 30.0 metres from the highway p
3. A MTO sign permit will be required prior to the placing of any signs visible from the hig
Building Services
Building Services requires the following:
1. A 3 m landscaped area abutting the road.
2. A 2.2 m high opaque fence is required around the storage area.
3. No shelving higher than 2.2 m is permitted.
4. It should be noted that the proposed future buildings would require adequate water for
purposes under the Ontario Building Code. The area is un-serviced therefore Ontario Fir
Standards would apply.
Development Engineering
This site not currently serviced with municipal water and sanitary sewer.
We have no objection to changing the zoning classification from "C2", General Commerci
to "R(S)", Rural Special to permit the use of the property as a Contractor's yard for the sto
and civil construction material.
Roads and Transportation Services
Estaire Road is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Transportation.
Public Consultation:
Given the minor nature of this application, a neighbourhood meeting was not recommend
of this report, no phone calls or correspondence regarding this proposal has been receive
Services Division.
Planning Considerations:
Zoning By-law Conformity
The subject lands are to be rezoned from "C2", General Commercial and "RU", Rural to "
Special. The use of the property will remain consistent with the Zoning By-law standards
properties.
f
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
21/167
The proposed rezoning conforms to the Official Plan. Consistent with Official Plan policie
be subject to site plan control. This application for "RU(S)", Rural Special zoning to allow
Yard is appropriate at this location and the Planning Services Division recommends that t
amend By-law 2010-100Z be approved.
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
22/167
ESTA
IRE
HORSESH
OELAKE
BIRCH
BRUCE
RU
RU
M5(13)
C2
C2
C2
RU(56)
RU(23)
6
68
26
27
24
65
40
91
24
83
31
46
66
53
264
138
393
157
407
181
153
112184
210
312
160
145
197
111
149
154
128
104
131
163
146
220
7289
7275
7302
7198
7198
7199
7274
7198
7198
7199
7199
T Lake
ESTA
LAVOLA Growth and Develo
Department
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
23/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
24/167
Photos 1 SUBJECT LANDS 7275 AND 7289 ESTAIRE ROAD
VIEWED LOOKING SOUTHWEST FROM ESTAIREROAD
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
25/167
Photo 3 7278 AND 7302 A ESTAIRE ROAD, EAST OF THE
SUBJECT LANDS VIEWED LOOKING EAST FROMESTAIRE ROAD
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
26/167
Request for Decision
Applications for Official Plan Amendment and
rezoning in order to permit a new elementary
school, Frood Road, Sudbury - Sudbury Catholic
District School Board
Presented To: Plannin
Presented: Monda
Report Date Tuesd
Type: Public
File Number: 701-6/
751-6/
Recommendation
Recommendation #1:
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by theSudbury Catholic District School Board to amend the City of
Greater Sudbury Official Plan by changing the land use
designation from Parks & Open Space to Institutional on those
lands described as Part of PIN 02179-0004, Part of Parcel 27
S.E.S., in Lot 7, Concession 4, Township of McKim.
Recommendation #2:
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by the
Sudbury Catholic District School Board to amend Zoning By-law
2010-100Z by changing the zoning classification from "OSP",
Open Space Private to "I", Institutional on those lands described
as Part of PIN 02179-0004, Part of Parcel 27 S.E.S., in Lot 7,
Concession 4, Township of McKim subject to the following
conditions:
a. That the owner provide the Development Approvals Section
with a registered survey plan outlining the lands to be rezoned to
enable the preparation of an amending zoning by-law;
b. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall
enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement with the City which
Signed By
Report Prepared ByMauro Manzon
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Reviewed By
Eric Taylor
Manager of Developm
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by thPaul Baskcomb
Director of Planning S
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by tDoug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative O
Digitally Signed Oct 1
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
27/167
iv) The owner shall extend the existing sidewalk on the west side of Frood Road from Vic
south limit of the subject property; and,
v) The owner shall agree to transfer to the City a 5 metre strip of property along the entire
Road upon demand, if and when required for future road improvements, free of mortgageother encumbrances securing financing. The City shall be responsible for all survey and le
associated with this transfer.
STAFF REPORT
Applicant:
Sudbury Catholic District School Board (Agent: YB Architecture)
Location:
Part of PIN 02179-0004, Part of Parcel 27 S.E.S., in Lot 7, Concession 4, Township of M
Sudbury)
Applications:
1. To amend the City of Greater Sudbury Official Plan from Parks & Open Space to Inst
2. To amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-law from "
Private to "I", Institutional.
Proposal:
Site specific applications for Official Plan Amendment and rezoning in order to permit a ne
school (St. David School). The proposed school will have a floor area of 2 600 m2 (27,98height of 1 to 2 storeys (maximum 8 metres). A section of the community trail would be re
accommodate development.
Official Plan Conformity:
The proposal does not conform to the Official Plan. The subject property is designated as
Space, which does not permit institutional uses. A site specific amendment to the Official
required.
The lands were previously subject to land reclamation, and are therefore subject to the fo
under Section 9.4 of the Official Plan:
1. It is policy of this Plan to support the continued reclamation of land that was severely im
mining activities.
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
28/167
4. In order to protect and improve the urban tree canopy, applications for subdivision or s
may require a landscape plan. The plans will include the following:
a) a description of how natural vegetation is being retained as much as possible;
b) the identification of trees or stands to be retained;
c) measures to protect trees to be retained during and after construction;
d) a description of vegetation and trees to be removed and replacement strategy and me
e) a detailed planting plan to illustrate proposed replacement strategy and measures for
including trees; and,
f) the use of native species wherever possible.
Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses:
The subject property is located on the west side of Frood Road, north of Dupont Street. T
serviced by municipal sewer and water services, which would have to be extended to the
Road is designated as a Collector Road, with ultimate right-of-way widths of 30 and 36 m
north of Shevchenko Street respectively). Currently there is a sidewalk on the east side o
The land subject to this rezoning proposal comprises part of a large City-owned parcel tha
subject to extensive land reclamation, including the planting of thousands of trees and for
Total site area of the land to be rezoned is 5.2 ha (12.9 acres), with 250 m (820 ft.) of fron
of approximately 228 m (748 ft.).
A maturing pine forest forms the easterly portion of the site where it abuts Frood Road. T
community trail is located at the southeast corner of the property. The trail runs adjacent t
drains a large marsh area. A smaller wetland feature is found in the southeast section of
attached map outlines the boundaries of the upper and lower wetland areas.
A rocky hilltop feature extends across the northerly portion of the property. Based on info
the Vegetation Enhancement Technical Advisory Committee (VETAC), the regreened po
adjacent to the marsh and stream are viewed as some of the best
examples of land reclamation and recovery in the City.
Lands abutting to the north are owned by MCTV and Vale. City-owned lands designated a
Space abut to the west and south. Established residential areas are located further to the
Frood Road.
Departmental & Agency Comments:
Development Engineering
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
29/167
While we have no objection to the proposed use of the subject property, we are concerne
accessibility and safety for children who will walk to the school. We require that the follow
included as part of any approval:
1) That the owner undertake a Traffic Impact Study to review pedestrian crossing safety determine if any road improvements are required. The study should also review school bu
circulation, as well as parent and staff parking facilities. Further, that the owner agrees to
cost of any improvements identified in the study to the satisfaction of the General Manage
Services.
2) That the owner extend the existing sidewalk on the west side of Frood Road from Vict
south limit of the subject property, a distance of approximately 100 metres.
3) The owner understands and agrees to transfer to the City a 5 metre strip of property afrontage of Frood Road upon demand, if and when required for future road improvements
mortgages, trust deeds and other encumbrances securing financing. The City shall be re
survey and legal costs associated with this transfer.
Drainage Section
No concerns.
Environmental Planning Initiatives
There are two environmentally related issues associated with the above-noted application
1. Wetlands
Two wetlands are present on the subject property as shown on the attached figure along
watercourse that eventually drains into a culvert under Frood Road. A watershed or subw
not been prepared for the area containing the subject property.Policy 3 in Section 9.2.3 of the City's Official Plan states:
"3. In areas without a watershed or subwatershed plan, development and site alteration a
a wetland unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no impacts to the quality and q
water features that are hydrologically linked to the wetland and that losses of significant w
and functions will not occur."
2. Tree Canopy Cover
Thousands of tree seedlings were planted on and adjacent to the subject property by the
Program since 1984. The table below lists the tree species planted specifically on the sub
intent of the Regreening Program is to improve the quality of Greater Sudbury's terrestria
by so doing, improve the health of the City's watersheds and urban and rural environmen
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
30/167
1997 Red Pine 500
Jack Pine 450
1998 Eastern White Cedar 350
White Pine 240
Black Spruce 130
White Spruce 130
1999 Jack Pine 2600
Policies in Section 9.4.2 of the City's Official Plan state:
"2. New development, redevelopment, and municipal infrastructure works on previously re
required to mitigate any impacts to existing soil and vegetation. Where mitigation through
possible, onsite soil erosion shall be prevented and all vegetation removed shall be replac
appropriate and adequate site landscaping and/or land reclamation measures.
3. New development, redevelopment, and municipal infrastructure works on land in need
be required to reclaim the soil and vegetation onsite to a level equal to or greater than wo
through the City's Land Reclamation Program.4. In order to protect and improve the urban tree canopy, applications for subdivision or s
may require a landscape plan. The plans will include the following:
a. A description of how natural vegetation is being retained as much as possible;
b. The identification of trees or stands to be retained;
c. Measures to protect trees to be retained during and after construction;
d. A description of vegetation and trees to be removed and replacement strategy and me
e. A detailed planting plan to illustrate proposed replacement strategy and measures for
including trees; and,
f. The use of native species wherever possible.
It is recommended that this application be required to develop a landscape plan containin
outlined above.
Neighbourhood Consultation:
The proponents conducted pre-consultation with City staff and VETAC prior to the lands b
surplus. In addition, a neighbourhood meeting was conducted on October 2, 2012 beginn
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
31/167
Community Improvement Plan.
On June 11, 2012, Planning Committee recommended that the subject lands be declared
accommodate the new school. It was further recommended that the proponents work with
Green Space Advisory Panel to ensure preservation of reclaimed areas to the extent pos
recommendation was ratified by Council on June 26, 2012.
Planning Considerations:
Council has declared a portion of the lands surplus in order to accommodate the propose
use conflicts are anticipated with adjacent uses given the nature of the site, as the propos
situated on a large parcel surrounded by green space. The key issues concerning this ap
the following:
integrating the development within the natural setting in order to protect historical land r
including maintaining public access; and,
infrastructure improvements required to service the new elementary school.
Preservation of green space
The lands are being conveyed with the expectation that the proponents will make every e
enhance the successful work towards regreening and recovery. The preliminary land use
by YB Architecture indicates that special consideration has been extended to integrating t
onto the property. Indeed it is the intent to make the unique setting and history of the recl
integral component of the design and curriculum of the new school. It is on this basis that
the conveyance of a much-valued site.
Some key elements of the proposed design are highlighted as follows:
The reforested area situated along the road corridor shall be maintained with the except
driveway entrance;
Although a section of the trail will have to be realigned in order to accommodate develop
access to the community trail and adjacent City-owned green space will be maintained;
The majority of the site will be left in its natural state;
There will be no encroachment into wetland areas, which are integrated into the develop
The natural drainage course shall be maintained;
The Site Plan Control Agreement can be utilized to address site alteration during the co
including such matters as siltation control and rock removal.
In order to ensure the implementation of the above noted elements, a landscape plan is r
condition of approval, consistent with Official Plan policies. The submission of a landscap
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
32/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
33/167
FROOD
BES
SIE
S
MONTAGUE
DUPO
NT
NADIA
SHEVCHENKO
UN
NA
ME
D
LAN
E10
0
U NN
AM
ED
LAN
E10
1
M4
OSP
M1(16)
I
R2-2
P
OSC
I(22)
R2-3
R2
-3
R2
-3
R2-3
R
R2-3
R2-3
R2
-2
R1-5
R2
-3
R1-5
R2
-3
R3
R2-3 R2-3
R2-3
R2-3
R3
R2-3(3)
61
57
6
4755
84
59
58 50
9183
90
699
833
140
515
465
487
491
40043
514
488
468
485476
445
42
438
488
392
350
149
445
42
468
520
473
408
129
53
441
477
340
530
464
424
502
421
536
462
439
52
43
492
144
45
433
474
448354
505
137
332
428
539
526
192
162
509
425
5
430
179
495
424 421
427
465
47
455
198
186
420
158
132
173
250485
168
462
440
445360
422
258
499
529
482
436
350
FROOD
LASALLE
OTREDAME
RIO
Growth and DeveloDepartment
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
34/167
e
100
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
35/167
UpperW
etland
LowerWetland
Watercourse
Watercours
0
25
50
75
12.5
Metres
WetlandAreasandWatercourse
McKimCon.4,Lot7,PartofParcel27SES
751-6-12-024 Wetland areas 1/1 Page 35 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
36/167
Photo 1 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - TRAIL ENTRANCEON FROOD ROAD
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
37/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
38/167
Photo 5 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - REPLANTED FORESTUNDERSTORY
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
39/167
Photo 7 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - CREEK OUTLET FROMMARSH AREA
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
40/167
Photo 9 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - NORTHEASTERLY VIEWOF LARGER MARSH AREA
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
41/167
Photo 11 FROOD ROAD, SUDBURY - VIEW OF CREEKDRAINING SOUTHEASTERLY
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
42/167
Request for Decision
Applications for rezoning and subdivision
approval in order to create a 163-lot subdivision
to be developed for single and double residential
uses, MacMillan Drive, Val Therese - 630411
Ontario Inc
Presented To: Plannin
Presented: Monda
Report Date Tuesd
Type: Public
File Number: 751-7/0
780-7/0
Recommendation
Recommendation #1:
That the City of Greater Sudbury approve the application by630411 Ontario Inc. to amend By-law 2010-100Z being the City
of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-law by changing the zoning
classification of lands described as PIN 73504-0952, Rem. of
Parcel 764 S.E.S., in Lot 6, Concession 1, Township of Hanmer
from "FD", Future Development to "R1-5", Low Density
Residential One and "R2-2", Low Density Residential Two
subject to the following conditions:
Signed By
Report Prepared ByMauro Manzon
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Reviewed By
Eric Taylor
Manager of Developm
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Paul Baskcomb
Director of Planning S
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by tDoug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative O
Digitally Signed Oct 1
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
43/167
751-7-09-008 report 1/19 Page 43 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
44/167
751-7-09-008 report 2/19 Page 44 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
45/167
751-7-09-008 report 3/19 Page 45 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
46/167
751-7-09-008 report 4/19 Page 46 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
47/167
751-7-09-008 report 5/19 Page 47 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
48/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
49/167
751-7-09-008 report 7/19 Page 49 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
50/167
751-7-09-008 report 8/19 Page 50 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
51/167
751-7-09-008 report 9/19 Page 51 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
52/167
751-7-09-008 report 10/19 Page 52 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
53/167
751-7-09-008 report 11/19 Page 53 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
54/167
751-7-09-008 report 12/19 Page 54 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
55/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
56/167
751-7-09-008 report 14/19 Page 56 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
57/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
58/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
59/167
751-7-09-008 report 17/19 Page 59 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
60/167
751-7-09-008 report 18/19 Page 60 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
61/167
751-7-09-008 report 19/19 Page 61 of 167
R1-5P
R1
-5
5
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
PR1-5
R2-2A
STREET
DRIVE
DIANE
ST
3976
3994
3969
3975
39873982 16531626
39603979
3941
3933
3960
3926
3988
39653964
3906 3934
3957
1673
39723934
3978
3947
3960
3951
3974
3980
3994
3930
3959
3934
3964
3942
3968
16353965
3977
39443942
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
62/167
RU
RU
FD
RU
RUFD
H30C2
R1-5
R1-5
RU
R1-5
P
P
R1-5
R1-1
R1
-5
R1-5
P
R
1-5
R
1-5
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
I(9)
R1-5
R1-5
R1-1.D
1
RU
R1-2
R1-5
I
RU
P
R1-5
R1-1
C2
C1
R2-2
R1-5
Whitson River
Whitson River
MUN
ICIPALROAD80(OLDHIGH
WAY69)ROAD
YORKSHIRE DRIVE
VELMA
MACMILLAN
D
JOHN STREET
CAROL STREET
MARK
STREET
CLAIRE
STREET
SWANSON
COURT
GEORGE STREET
HENRY COURT
RICHARD STREET
SUZANN
E
STREET
CECILE STREET
TREET
3366
1647
1833
1795
1736
1735
38423853
38493839
3834
1575
1568
1563
1714
3826
3810
3637
3904
3899
3622
1690
16371610
3825
17163903
3874
1745
3786
1696
1707
3856
3893
1643
1687
3873
3358
1634
1648
1645
3790
3803
3857
3912
3776
1697
1525
3926
3840
1633
1695
1624
3691
3593
1590
3819
3849
1700
3859
1664
3888
3663
3612
3689
1725
1688
3376
3834
3663
3674
3661
1724
3749
3867
3898
1576
3649
1559
3773
1592
1576
1564
3625
1630
3697
1623
3723
1699
1677
3904
16481702
3835
3789
3855
3370
3746
1629
3862
3800
1716
3722
17071818
1739
3612
3813
3905
1628
1702
1713
3838
1736
3662
3621
3788
3674
3843
3907
1607
3882
1712
1643
3720
1729
3623
3601
3893
1750
3352
1668
3886
3851
1710
3713
1730
3875
1733
3685
3601
3910
3612
1667
3795
3432
3885
3808
1700
3915
3826
3868
1533
3766
1743
3653
3711
1648
1656
3682
3661
3480
3394
1597
1545
3890
3846
3571
3673
1635
3664
3613
3673
1644
3687
3858
1777
176217801810
DOMINION DRIVE
WAY69)ROAD
VELMAS
WILFRED STREET
Growth and Develo
Department
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
63/167
LILLIANSTREET
ROSE COURT
HERI TAG E
DRIVE
CHELSEAA
VEN
UE
LAROCQUEA
VEN
UE
EUGENE STREET
MIRAGEB
OU
LE
VARD
CLASSIC
PA
RKWA
Y
CONCORDESTREET
Community Boundary
Lakes
Subject Property
Road
Schedule 1c excerptLand Use Designations
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
64/167
Subject Pro
OMB
MUNICIPALROAD80(OL
DHIGHWAY69)ROAD
YORKSHIRE DRIVE
VELMASTREET
MACMILLAN
DRIVE
CLARENCESTREET
JOHN STREET
CAROL STREET
MAR
K
STREET
CLAIR
ESTREET
SWANSONCOURT
GEORGE STREET
HENRY COURT
RICHARD STREET
SUZAN
NESTREET
NORMAN CRESCENT
CHARLES COURT
HAROLDCRESCENT
CECILE STREET
WAYNECRESCENT
HARRY STREET
DIANE
STREET
SADDLECR
EEK
DRIVE
JOSEPHINE DRIVE
SANDRA COURT
CLakes
Land Use
Living Area 1
Mixed Use Commercial
Parks & Open Space
Urban Expansion Reserve
Agricultural Reserve
Rural
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
65/167
751-7-09-008 Housing Model 1/2 Page 65 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
66/167
751-7-09-008 Housing Model 2/2 Page 66 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
67/167
Photo 1 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - NORTHERLY
VIEW OF MACMILLAN DRIVE
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
68/167
Photo 3 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - WATERCOUR
SOUTH OF MACMILLAN DRIVE
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
69/167
Photo 5 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - TYPICALVEGETATION
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
70/167
Photo 7 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESE - VIEW OF
NORTHERLY PART OF PROPERTY
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
71/167
Photo 9 MACMILLAN DRIVE, VAL THERESENORTHWESTERLY VIEW TOWARDSCAMPEAU STREET
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
72/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
73/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 1/21 Page 73 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
74/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 2/21 Page 74 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
75/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 3/21 Page 75 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
76/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 4/21 Page 76 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
77/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 5/21 Page 77 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
78/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 6/21 Page 78 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
79/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 7/21 Page 79 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
80/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 8/21 Page 80 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
81/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 9/21 Page 81 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
82/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
83/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 11/21 Page 83 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
84/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 12/21 Page 84 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
85/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
86/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 14/21 Page 86 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
87/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 15/21 Page 87 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
88/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 16/21 Page 88 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
89/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 17/21 Page 89 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
90/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 18/21 Page 90 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
91/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 19/21 Page 91 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
92/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 20/21 Page 92 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
93/167
751-7-09-008 letters of concern 21/21 Page 93 of 167
Request for Decision
Presented To: Plannin
P t d M d
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
94/167
Request for Decision
Consent referral request for Consent Applications
B92/2012 to B94/2012, 5174 Desmarais Road,
Hanmer - Diane & Marcel Boulais
Presented: Monda
Report Date Tuesd
Type: Routin
Report
Recommendation
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury permit Consent Applications
B0092/2012, B0093/2012 and B0094/2012 on those lands
described as PIN 73506-0122, Parcel 951, Lot 6, Concession 4,
Township of Hanmer, to proceed by way of the consent process.
STAFF REPORT
Applicant:
Marcel & Diane Boulais
Location:
PIN 73506-0122, Parcel 951, Lot 6, Concession 4, Township of
Hanmer (5174 Desmarais Road, Hanmer)
Application:
In accordance with Section 20.4.1 of the Official Plan, the
Consent Official has referred the subject application for consent
to the Planning Committee in order to determine whether the
applications should be permitted to proceed by way of the
consent process or alternatively if a plan of subdivision is
required.
Signed By
Report Prepared By
Glen Ferguson
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1Reviewed By
Eric Taylor
Manager of Developm
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Paul Baskcomb
Director of Planning S
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by t
Doug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative O
Digitally Signed Oct 1
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
95/167
process as the preferred method for lot creation in this case. It is on this basis therefore th
recommends that it would appropriate for the proposed new lots to proceed by way of the
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
96/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
97/167
COA - boulais 1/2 Page 97 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
98/167
Request for Decision
Presented To: Plannin
Presented: Monda
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
99/167
Request to rescind Deeming By-law 91-18,
Subdivision M-1003, Scenic View, Lot 10,
Concession 3, Township of Neelon Zulich
Enterprises Limited
Report Date Tuesd
Type: Routin
Report
File Number: 780-6/
Recommendation
THAT the City of Greater Sudbury approve the request by Zulich
Enterprises Limited to rescind Deeming By-law 91-18 on the
lands described as Subdivision M-1003, Lots 25 to 32, 45 to 69,
and 74 to 106, 110 to 130, and Lot 133, Lot 10, Concession 3,Township of Neelon subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to the rescinding of the deeming by-law the applicant
shall enter into a development agreement(s) with the City of
Greater Sudbury, addressing the provision of infrastructure and
other improvements, for each phase of the development of the
lots to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Growth and
Development.
2. That the owner finalize the Tranplan October 2012 Traffic
Impact Study and agree to participate in the cost of any upgrades
or improvements including the owner to be responsible for the
construction of a sidewalk on the existing section of Birmingham
Drive between Dorsett Drive and Bancroft Drive to the
satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure Services.
3. Prior to the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall, to
the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services, provide an
updated geotechnical report prepared, signed, sealed, and dated
by a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario
Signed By
Report Prepared By
Alex Singbush
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Reviewed By
Eric Taylor
Manager of Developm
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Paul Baskcomb
Director of Planning SDigitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by t
Doug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative ODigitally Signed Oct 1
The geotechnical information on building foundations shall be to the satisfaction of the Ch
and Director of Planning Services.
4. All streets will be constructed to an urban standard, including the required curbs and gu
5. The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan prepared, signed, sealed, and date
civil engineer with a valid certificate of authorization for the proposed lots as part of the su
servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses, retaining walls
swales slopes and lot corners The plan must show sufficient grades on boundary proper
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
100/167
swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on boundary proper
lot grading of the new site to existing properties and show the stormwater overland flow p
6. The owner agrees to provide the required soils report, water, sanitary sewer and lot gra
planning reports and plans to the Director of Planning Services prior to the submission of
any phase of the subdivision.
7. The owner shall develop a siltation control plan for the subdivision construction period tof the Director of Planning Services, Nickel District Conservation Authority and Fisheries
Canada.
8. Any streetlights required for this subdivision will be designed and constructed by Great
Plus Inc. at the cost of the owner.
9. As part of the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall have rear yard slope treat
a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario incorporated into the lot gradi
as required at locations required by the Director of Planning Services. Suitable provisionsincorporated into the Development Agreement to ensure that the treatment is undertaken
of the Director of Planning Services.
10. The owner shall provide a utilities servicing plan showing the location of all utilities inc
services, Greater Sudbury Hydro Plus or Hydro One, Bell, Union Gas, Canada Post and P
must be to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and must be provided prio
any individual phase.
11. The owner shall provide proof of sufficient fire flow in conjunction with the submission
drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing
to service this subdivision will be bourne totally by the owner.
12. The owner shall provide proof of sufficient sanitary sewer capacity in conjunction with
construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading
collection system and/or sewage lift stations to service this subdivision will be bourne tota
Any and all development charges associated with the sanitary sewer flow directed to the Station must be paid at the time of the owner entering into the development agreement fo
of the effected lots.
13. The subject phase to be developed will be required to provide a cash contribution in l
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
101/167
in situations where the conditions of the subdivision agreement have not been met
of registration.
The Official Plan language is similar to Subsection 4 of Section 50 of the Planning Act wh
The council of a local municipality may by by-law designate any plan of subdivision
that has been registered for eight years or more, which shall be deemed not to be
subdivision for the purposes of subsection (3). R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, s. 50 (4).
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
102/167
A by-law deeming a plan of subdivision not to be a plan of subdivision only affects the co
and does not void or expunge the plan of subdivision.
In accordance with Section 11.11 of the Regional Official Plan, the Region had a policy th
all plans of subdivision, or significant portions thereof, which had been registered for eigh
developed. In 1991 Planning Committee deemed a number of subdivisions, for a variety
goal being that new subdivision agreements would be registered against the lands.
By-law 91-18 enacted by the Regional Municipality of Sudbury on January 30, 1991 deem
the Scenic View subdivision not registered for the purposes of Section 50(3) of the Plann
to the Planning Committee of the Regional Municipality of Sudbury dated January 17, 199
a number of subdivisions, indicates the following with respect to the Scenic View Subdivis
M-1003 Scenic View Subdivision - Registered February 18th, 1975, City of Sudbury
subdivision has been developed. The balance of the subdivision (Lots 25 to 32, 45
110 to 130 and 133) is under the name of Sudvenco Corporation Limited. They wethe Engineering Department in 1989 about developing the next phase of this subdi
has been heard since. No property has been transferred out of this subdivision sinc
charges on title and a Ministry of Revenue Notice of Lien on title to the property.
Staff also understands that, at the time the by-law was enacted, there were concerns with
the Levesque St. sanitary sewer lift pump. The Levesque Street lift station has since been
capacity is no longer an issue for sanitary flow.
The subdivision is currently zoned with mix of "R2-2", Low Density Residential Two, lots 1
applicants proposed first phase), and "R1-5", Low Density Residential One, lots 25 to 32,
to 106, and Lot 133 (the applicants subsequent phases). All of the lots meet the minimu
and depth standards for their respective zones in accordance with By-law 2010-100Z, the
Sudbury Zoning By-law.
A Traffic Impact study dated October 2012 was prepared by Tranplan in support of the ow
rescind the deeming by-law. Roads and Transportation Services comments on the impac
provided later in this report.
Development Engineering has advised that servicing, grading, and related improvements
and shall be designed to the Citys current engineering standards and requirements.
and Dorsett Drive to the east. Additionally, 150 mm diameter water main is available at C
and Cambridge Crescent. A fire flow analysis indicates that the subdivision lands meet th
standard of 75 litres per second and the required maximum hour and maximum day press
existing system.
There is currently a sanitary sewer collection system to the subject property. A 200 mm d
sewer exists at Birmingham Drive and Dorsett Drive to the west and a 200 mm diameter sexists at Nottingham Avenue and Dorsett Drive to the east. Additionally, 200 mm diamet
available at Covington Crescent Lots along Birmingham Drive will contribute sanitary se
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
103/167
available at Covington Crescent. Lots along Birmingham Drive will contribute sanitary se
gravity sanitary sewer system on Bancroft Drive flowing westerly to a Drop Shaft to the R
at MH 11-256 on Mildred Street. Properties on Covington Crescent, Cambridge Crescen
remainder of Nottingham Avenue will contribute sanitary sewage flow to the sanitary sewe
Bancroft Drive flowing easterly to the Levesque Lift Station. The Levesque Lift Station pu
system on Bancroft Drive directly north of Dorsett Drive. There is a development charge
all sanitary sewer flow directed to the Levesque Lift Station. This charge must be paid atowner entering into the development agreement for the development of any lots that outle
The Development Engineering Section will require an updated comprehensive geotechnic
Included in this report must be a detailed review of soils type including details regarding th
substandard soils and placement of engineered fill for the construction of homes. Also, th
include an analysis illustrating how the groundwater table will be lowered to a level that w
problems to adjacent boundary housing and will, in conjunction with the subdivision gradi
basements of new homes will not require extensive foundation drainage pumping. Detailregarding the installation of pipework within any substandard soils limits will also be a req
report. The geotechnical report and comments on infrastructure construction for this sub
submitted in conjunction with or prior to the submission of engineering drawings.
The City requires that all new streets be constructed including curbs, gutters, storm sewe
binder and surface courses. Sight triangles to City standards are to be provided at all co
The subject area is located in the Ramsey Watershed. The Citys Drainage Engineer pro
comments with regards to stormwater:
1) The subject phase to be developed will be required to provide a cash contribution in lie
stormwater management controls and will be required to contribute towards downstream
conveyance and stormwater management control improvements to be completed by the C
2) The major storm overland flow path is to be engineered and clearly identified to an acc
3) The owner is required to construct a stormwater system to inlet stormwater from the re
phase of the development to the existing storm sewer on Dorsett Drive.
The following conditions apply with respect to lifting the deeming by-law:
1) P i t th b i i f i i l th h ll t th ti f ti f th Di
illustrating how the groundwater table will be lowered to a level that will
not cause problems to adjacent boundary housing and will, in conjunction with the subdiv
show that basements of new homes will not require extensive foundation drainage pumpi
geotechnical information on building foundations shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief B
Director of Planning Services.
2) All streets will be constructed to an urban standard, including the required curbs and g3) The owner shall provide a detailed lot grading plan prepared, signed, sealed, and date
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
104/167
) p g g p p p g
professional civil engineer with a valid certificate of authorization for the proposed lots as
submission of servicing plans. This plan must show finished grades around new houses,
sideyards, swales, slopes and lot corners. The plan must show sufficient grades on boun
mesh the lot grading of the new site to existing properties and show the stormwater overla
4) The owner agrees to provide the required soils report, water, sanitary sewer and lot gra
planning reports and plans to the Director of Planning Services prior to the submission of any phase of the subdivision.
5) The owner shall develop a siltation control plan for the subdivision construction period
of the Director of Planning Services, Nickel District Conservation Authority and Fisheries
Canada.
6) Any streetlights required for this subdivision will be designed and constructed by Great
Plus Inc. at the cost of the owner.7) As part of the submission of servicing plans, the owner shall have rear yard slope treat
a geotechnical engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario incorporated into the lot gradi
as required at locations required by the Director of Planning Services. Suitable provision
incorporated into the Development Agreement to ensure that the treatment is undertaken
of the Director of Planning Services.
8) The owner shall provide a utilities servicing plan showing the location of all utilities incl
Greater Sudbury Hydro Plus or Hydro One, Bell, Union Gas, Canada Post and Persona. to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and must be provided prior to cons
individual phase.
9) The owner shall provide proof of sufficient fire flow in conjunction with the submission o
drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing
system to service this subdivision will be bourne totally by the owner.
10) The owner shall provide proof of sufficient sanitary sewer capacity in conjunction with
construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgradin
collection system and/or sewage lift stations to service this subdivision will be bourne tota
Any and all development charges associated with the sanitary sewer flow directed to the
St ti t b id t th ti f th t i i t th d l t t f
Roads and Transportation
We have completed our review of the October 2012 Tranplan traffic impact study and agr
recommendation that no mitigation measures or road improvements are required to suppo
development. As a condition of approval, we do recommend that the owner be responsib
sidewalk on the existing section of Birmingham Drive between Dorsett Drive and Bancrof
Operations
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
105/167
No concerns.
Building Services
1. The property shall require a development agreement and during that process, based o
quantities of removal of rock through blasting, the following conditions will be imposed:
a. The developer will be required to provide a geotechnical report on how the work relate
be undertaken safely to protect adjoining structures and other infrastructure. The geotec
be undertaken by a blasting consultant defined as a professional engineer licensed in the
Ontario with a minimum of five (5) years experience related to blasting.
b. The blasting consultant shall be retained by the developer and shall be independent o
any subcontractor doing blasting work. The blasting consultant shall be required to comp
monitoring recommended in his report of vibration levels and provide a report detailing th
vibration levels. Copies of the recorded ground vibration documents shall be provided to
contract administration weekly or upon request for this specific project.
c. The geotechnical report will provide recommendations and specifications on the follow
minimum but not limited to:
- Pre-blast survey of surface structures and infrastructure within affected area
- Trial blast activities
- Procedures during blasting
- Procedures for addressing blasting damage complaints
- Blast notification mechanism to adjoining residences
- Structural stability of exposed rock faces
d. The above report shall be submitted for review to the satisfaction of the Chief Building
commencement of any removal of rock by blasting.
e. Should the developers schedule require to commence blasting and rock removal prior
development agreement having been signed, a site alteration permit shall be required und
execution of development agreement(s) with the City of Greater Sudbury, addressing the
infrastructure and other improvements, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Grow
Development along with specific reports and plans required in order to permit the constru
and the development of the lots.
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
106/167
SHEL
BOUR
NE
PRES
COTT
FOURTH
OD
ALLIS
TON
R1-5
R1-5
R2-2
R1-5
R2-2
R2-2
R2-2
PR1-5
R2-2
C1
R2-2
R2-2(8)
R2-2R1-5
1
7 3 2
2
7
7
8
2
7
8
7
866
14
56
26
38
78
38
83
25
32
35
41
13
84
25
21
38
62
61
71
47
14
11
14
31
13
38
29
31
70
20
25
19
26
50
30
15
32
89 93
38
10
44
30 55
44
77
50 50
38
145
345
133
356
139
351
165
157
151
2600
2400
2590
2482
2403
26142618
2610
2388
2333
2376
2538
2568
2371
2380
26222618
2444
26002450
2550
2400
2450 2622
2380
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
107/167
DORS
ETT
NAVANOD
BRENTWOO
BIRMIN
GH
AM
NOTTINGHAM
FD
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
R1-5
I
R1-5
R2
-2R2
-2
R1
-5R1
-5
Ramsey Lake
Ramsey LakeRamsey Lake
18
19
3431
42
4239
19
1915
26
18
19
10
43
27
31
2323
13
19
122
2662
2349
2515
2650
2482
2663
2625
2560
2407
2347
2554
2537
2369
2548
25792571
2574
2433
2471
2631
2455
2403
2524
2619
2585
2531
2455
2614
2620
2482
2461
2596
2538
2610
2542
2644
2526
2654
2549
2550
2369
2397
2509
2455
2597
2614
2531
2568
2397
2461
2538
2604
2530
2585
2643
2578
2532
2555
2654
2614
2349
2487
2631
2605
2471
2555
2551
26182472
2600
2332
24512590
26182610
2523
2481
2551
2662
2551
2515
2584
2326
2411
2481
2600
2407
2
2632
2626
2507
2347
2600
2373
2620
2643
2600
2524
2579
2450
2505
2487
2622
BANCROFT
SECON
D
KINGSWAY
TH L
IGHT
RHEAL
THIRD
QUE
HEBERT
RAYMOND
OUNT
RITA E
Growth and DeveloDepartment
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
108/167
780-6-73-12 zulich letter 1/1 Page 108 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
109/167
780-6-73-12 by-law 1/4 Page 109 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
110/167
780-6-73-12 by-law 2/4 Page 110 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
111/167
780-6-73-12 by-law 3/4 Page 111 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
112/167
780-6-73-12 by-law 4/4 Page 112 of 167
For Information Only
Draft Provincial Policy Statement Review
Presented To: Plannin
Presented: Monda
Report Date Tuesd
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
113/167
a t o c a o cy State e t e e p
Type: Corres
Inform
Recommendation
For the information of Planning Committee
Background
The Province of Ontario recently released a draft of a revised
Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and is seeking comments from
various stakeholders. The PPS is issued under the Planning Act
and is the statement of the Provinces policies concerning land
use planning. The PPS provides policy direction for the entire
province on matters of provincial interest in land use planning
and development.
Implementation of the PPS is set out through the Planning Act,
which requires that decisions on land use planning matters made
by municipalities, the Province, the Ontario Municipal Board and
other decision-makers shall be consistent with the PPS.
Municipalities are the prime implementers of the PPS through
policies in their municipal official plans and through decisions on
other planning matters.
The Planning Act requires that the PPS be reviewed every five
years to determine whether revisions are needed. The five-year
review of the PPS commenced in March 1, 2010 and since then
th P i h d t d lt ti O t i ith b f th
Signed By
Report Prepared By
Kris Longston
Senior Planner
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Reviewed By
Mark Simeoni
Manager of Commun
Planning
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Paul Baskcomb
Director of Planning S
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by th
Bill Lautenbach
General Manager of G
Development
Digitally Signed Oct 1
Recommended by t
Doug Nadorozny
Chief Administrative O
Digitally Signed Oct 1
The purpose of this report is to provide Planning Committee with a general overview of th
changes to the PPS, focusing on any that may have an impact on land use planning prac
Sudbury and to discuss the next steps with respect to providing comments to the Provinc
PPS. Attached to the Report is a copy of the draft PPS.
Proposed PPS Policy Changes
The Province has highlighted a number of changes to policies that it feels build upon the
framework in the 2005 PPS and are intended to provide stronger, clearer direction to sup
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
114/167
the Province. Some of the highlighted policy changes that may be of interest to the City a
Building Strong Healthy Communities by:
Recognizing the range and diversity of settlement areas across Ontario
Recognizing that all areas experience land use change but not necessarily growth
Clarifying that the requirements to support small expansions of settlements may b
for large expansions
Allowing limited use of septic tanks and wells for minor infill development and rou
unserviced settlement areas
Recognizing Aboriginal interests
Encouraging planning authorities to coordinate planning with Aboriginal communi
appropriate
Acknowledging that the PPS is to be implemented in a manner consistent with Ab
rights in the Constitution Act, 1982
Encouraging coordination of emergency management with other planning conside
Recognizing the importance of parks and recreation, green spaces, trails and trai
Requiring the consideration of potential impacts of climate change adaptation and
Encouraging green infrastructure and strengthening stormwater management req
Directing development away from areas of high to extreme risk of wildland fire un
mitigated
Clarifying that planning for infrastructure can go beyond the 20 year time horizon
Supporting long-term planning for employment areas
Supporting the adaptive re-use of infrastructure
Requiring consideration of the life-cycle cost of infrastructure
Permitting additional uses on farms and providing flexibility for agricultural-related
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
115/167
Requiring agricultural areas to be designated in municipal official plans and impac
development surrounding agricultural operations to be mitigated
Protecting the Environment and Resources by:
Requiring identification of shoreline areas
Requiring the identification of natural heritage systems in southern Ontario
Refining the area of protection for significant woodlands and valleylands in southe
Promoting the conservation of cultural heritage and archaeological resources
Conclusion
As with the current PPS, the draft PPS is divided into different sections which focus on di
land use planning in Ontario. These sections are Building Strong Communities, Wise Use
of Resources, Protecting Public Health and Safety, Implementation and Interpretation, anDefinitions.
There are numerous changes proposed to the PPS from the current 2005 version. Some
are relatively minor clarification items, while others may have more of an impact on the C
report is a copy of the draft PPS that was released by the Province.
In order to better understand the proposed changes to the PPS and the potential impact t
land use planning in Greater Sudbury, Staff will be attending an upcoming PPS informatioput on by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and will also be discussing the pro
with planning staff from other northern municipalities.
f f ff C
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
116/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 1/52 Page 116 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
117/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 2/52 Page 117 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
118/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 3/52 Page 118 of 167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
119/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
120/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 5/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
121/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 6/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
122/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 7/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
123/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 8/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
124/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 9/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
125/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 10/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
126/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 11/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
127/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 12/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
128/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 13/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
129/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 14/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
130/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 15/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
131/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 16/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
132/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 17/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
133/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 18/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
134/167
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
135/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 20/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
136/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 21/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
137/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 22/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
138/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 23/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
139/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 24/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
140/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 25/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
141/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 26/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
142/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 27/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
143/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 28/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
144/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 29/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
145/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 30/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
146/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 31/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
147/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 32/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
148/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 33/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
149/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 34/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
150/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 35/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
151/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 36/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
152/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement 2012 37/52
-
7/31/2019 Oct 29 Planning committee meeting
153/167
Draft Provincial Policy Statement