observation sins hear wall strength in tall buildings
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
1/30
1
Observations in Shear Wall
Strength in Tall Buildings
Presented by StructurePoint
at ACI Spring 2012 Convention in Dallas, Texas
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
2/30
2
Metropolitan Tower, New York City
68-story, 716 ft (218m) skyscraper
Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall Buildings by Bungale
S. Taranath
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
3/30
3
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
4/30
4
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
5/30
5
Jin Mao Tower, Shanghai, China
88-story, 1381 ft (421m)
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
6/30
6
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
7/30
7
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
8/30
8
Motivation
Sharing insight from detailed analysis and
implementation of code provisions
Sharing insight from members of ACI committees
Sharing insight from wide base of spColumn users
Raising awareness of irregularities and their impacton design
Conclusions apply to all sections, but especially
those of irregular shape and loaded with largenumber of load cases and combinations, e.g. Shear
Walls
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
9/30
9
Outline
Observations
P-M Diagram Irregularities
Symmetry/Asymmetry
Strength Reduction Factor
Uniaxial/Biaxial Bending
Moment Magnification Irregularities
Conclusions
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
10/30
10
P-M Diagram
Design
(Pu1
, Mu1
) NG
(Pu2
, Mu2
) OK
(Pu3
, Mu3
) NG
Notice Pu1 < Pu2 < Pu3
with Mu
=const
One Quadrant OK if
Pu
0 and Mu
0
Section shapesymmetrical
Reinforcementsymmetrical
z
x
y
P
M
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
11/30
11
P-M Diagram
Pos./Neg. Load Signs
All four quadrants are needed if loads change sign
If section shape and reinforcement are symmetrical then
M-
side is a mirror of M+ side
P (kip)
Mx (k-ft)
700
-200
18018 0
(Pmax)(Pmax)
(Pmin)(Pmin)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
12/30
12
P-M Diagram
Asymmetric Section
Each quadrant different
(Pu1
, Mu1
) NG
(Pu2
, Mu2
) OK
(Pu3
, Mu3
) OK
(Pu4
, Mu4
) NG
Notice:
Absolute value ofmoments same onboth sides
Larger axial forcefavorable on M+ sidebut unfavorable onM-
side
P (kip)
Mx (k-ft)
40000
-10000
6000040000
(Pmax)(Pmax)
(Pmin)(Pmin)
12
34
x
Mx>0
y
Compressionx
Mx
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
13/30
13
P-M Diagram Asymmetric Steel
Skewed Diagram
Plastic Centroid
Geometrical Centroid
(Concrete Centroid Steel Centroid)
(Pu1
, Mu1
) NG, (Pu2
, Mu2
) OK, (Pu3
, Mu3
) NG
|Mu1
| < |Mu2
| < |Mu3
| with Pu
= constP ( kN)
Mx ( kNm)
4500
-1500
45045 0
(Pmax)(Pmax)
(Pmin)(Pmin)
123
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
14/30
14
P-M Diagram Factor
Strength reduction factor = (t
)
t
n
n
(c ) P
usually( P )sometimes
Compression
controlled
fy
Es
0.75 or 0.70.65
Spiral*
Other
0.005
Transition zone Tension
Controlled
0.9
c
1 c
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
15/30
15
P-M Diagram Factor
Usually
Sometimes
n(c ) ( P ) n(c ) ( P )
Sections with a narrow portionalong height, e.g.: I, L, T, U, C-
shaped or irregular sections
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
16/30
16
P-M Diagram Factor
(Pu1
, Mu1
) OK, (Pu2
, Mu2
) NG, (Pu3
, Mu3
) OKMu1
< Mu2
< Mu3
with Pu
= const
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
17/30
17
P-M Diagram Factor
(Pu1
, Mu1
) OK, (Pu2
, Mu2
) NG, (Pu3
, Mu3
) OK
|Mu1
| < |Mu2
| < |Mu3
| with Pu
= const
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
18/30
18
P-M Diagram Factor
(Pu1
, Mu1
) OK
(Pu2
, Mu2
) NG
(Pu3
, Mu3
) OK
Pu1
< Pu2
< Pu3
with Mu
= const
P (kip)
Mx (k-ft)
60000
-10000
7000070000
fs=0.5fy
fs=0
fs=0.5fy
fs=0
(Pmax)(Pmax)
(Pmin)(Pmin)
fs=0.5fy
fs=0
fs=0.5fy
fs=0
123
fs=0.5fy
123
t
n
n
(c )M or
( M ) or
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
19/30
19
Uniaxial/Biaxial
Symmetric Case
3D failure surface with tips directly on the P axis
Uniaxial X = Biaxial P-Mx
with My = 0
Uniaxial Y = Biaxial P-My
with Mx
= 0
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
20/30
20
Uniaxial/Biaxial
Asymmetric case
Tips of 3D failure surface may beoff the P axis
Uniaxial X means N.A. parallel toX axis but this produces Mx
0
and My
0
Uniaxial X may be different than
Biaxial P-Mx
with My
= 0
c
1 c
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
21/30
21
Uniaxial/Biaxial
Asymmetric Case
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
22/30
22
Moment Magnification
Sway Frames
Magnification at column ends (Sway frames)
M2
= M2ns
+ s
M2s
If sign(M2ns
) = -sign(M2s
) then the magnified moment,
M2
, is smaller than first order moment (M2ns
+M2s
) or it
can even change sign, e.g.:
M2ns
= 16 k-ft, M2s
= -10.0 k-ft, = 1.2 M2
= 16 + 1.2 (-10.0) = 4.0 k-ft
(M2ns
+M2s
) = 6.0 k-ft
M2ns
= 16 k-ft, M2s
= -14.4 k-ft,
= 1.2
M2
= 16 + 1.2 (-14.4) = -1.28 k-ft (M2ns
+M2s
) = 1.6 k-ft
First-order moment may govern the design rather thansecond order-moment
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
23/30
23
Moment Magnification
Sway Frames
Since ACI 318-08
moments in
compression members
in sway frames are
magnified both at ends
and along length
Prior to ACI 318-08
magnification along
length applied only if
u
u
'c g
35
r P
f A
l
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
24/30
24
Moment Magnification
M
1
M1
may govern thedesign rather than M2
even though |M2
| > |M1
|
and ACI 318, 10.10.6provision stipulates thatcompression membersshall be designed forMc
= M2
. Consider:
Double curvature
bending (M1
/M2
< 0)
Asymmetric Section
M2
OK but
M1 NG
M
P
M2M1 M2M1
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
25/30
25
Moment Magnification
M2nd/M1st
ACI 318-11, 10.10.2.1 limits ratio of second-ordermoment to first-order moments
M2nd/M1st < 1.4
What if ratio is negative, e.g.:
M1st
= Mns
+ Ms
= 10.0 + (-9.0) = 1.0 k-ft
M2nd = (Mns
+ s
Ms
) = 1.05 (10.0+1.3(-9.0)) = -1.78 k-ft
M2nd/M1st
= -1.78 OK or NG ?
Check |M2nd/M1st|= 1.78 > 1.4 NG
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
26/30
26
Moment Magnification
M2nd/M1st
What if M1st
is very small, i.e. M1st < Mmin
, e.g.:
M1st
= M2
= 0.1 k-ft (Nonsway frame)
Mmin
= Pu
(0.6 +0.03h) = 5 k-ft
M2nd = Mc
= Mmin
= 1.1*5 = 5.5 k-ft
M2nd/M1st
= 5.5/0.1 = 55 OK or NG ?
Check M2nd/Mmin
= 1.1 OK
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
27/30
27
Conclusions
Summary
Irregular shapes of sections and reinforcementpatterns lead to irregular and distortedinteraction diagrams
Large number of load cases and loadcombinations lead to large number of load pointspotentially covering entire (P, Mx
, My
) space
Intuition may overlook unusual conditions in tallstructures
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
28/30
28
Conclusions
Recommendations
Do not eliminate load cases and combinationsbased on intuition
Run biaxial rather than uniaxial analysis for
asymmetric sections
Run both 1st order and 2nd
order analysis
Apply engineering judgment rather than
following general code provisions literally
Use reliable software and verify its results
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
29/30
29
-
8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings
30/30
30
Call: +1-847-966-4357
Email: [email protected]