observation sins hear wall strength in tall buildings

Upload: muhammed-mohsin

Post on 04-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    1/30

    1

    Observations in Shear Wall

    Strength in Tall Buildings

    Presented by StructurePoint

    at ACI Spring 2012 Convention in Dallas, Texas

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    2/30

    2

    Metropolitan Tower, New York City

    68-story, 716 ft (218m) skyscraper

    Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall Buildings by Bungale

    S. Taranath

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    3/30

    3

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    4/30

    4

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    5/30

    5

    Jin Mao Tower, Shanghai, China

    88-story, 1381 ft (421m)

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    6/30

    6

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    7/30

    7

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    8/30

    8

    Motivation

    Sharing insight from detailed analysis and

    implementation of code provisions

    Sharing insight from members of ACI committees

    Sharing insight from wide base of spColumn users

    Raising awareness of irregularities and their impacton design

    Conclusions apply to all sections, but especially

    those of irregular shape and loaded with largenumber of load cases and combinations, e.g. Shear

    Walls

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    9/30

    9

    Outline

    Observations

    P-M Diagram Irregularities

    Symmetry/Asymmetry

    Strength Reduction Factor

    Uniaxial/Biaxial Bending

    Moment Magnification Irregularities

    Conclusions

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    10/30

    10

    P-M Diagram

    Design

    (Pu1

    , Mu1

    ) NG

    (Pu2

    , Mu2

    ) OK

    (Pu3

    , Mu3

    ) NG

    Notice Pu1 < Pu2 < Pu3

    with Mu

    =const

    One Quadrant OK if

    Pu

    0 and Mu

    0

    Section shapesymmetrical

    Reinforcementsymmetrical

    z

    x

    y

    P

    M

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    11/30

    11

    P-M Diagram

    Pos./Neg. Load Signs

    All four quadrants are needed if loads change sign

    If section shape and reinforcement are symmetrical then

    M-

    side is a mirror of M+ side

    P (kip)

    Mx (k-ft)

    700

    -200

    18018 0

    (Pmax)(Pmax)

    (Pmin)(Pmin)

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    12/30

    12

    P-M Diagram

    Asymmetric Section

    Each quadrant different

    (Pu1

    , Mu1

    ) NG

    (Pu2

    , Mu2

    ) OK

    (Pu3

    , Mu3

    ) OK

    (Pu4

    , Mu4

    ) NG

    Notice:

    Absolute value ofmoments same onboth sides

    Larger axial forcefavorable on M+ sidebut unfavorable onM-

    side

    P (kip)

    Mx (k-ft)

    40000

    -10000

    6000040000

    (Pmax)(Pmax)

    (Pmin)(Pmin)

    12

    34

    x

    Mx>0

    y

    Compressionx

    Mx

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    13/30

    13

    P-M Diagram Asymmetric Steel

    Skewed Diagram

    Plastic Centroid

    Geometrical Centroid

    (Concrete Centroid Steel Centroid)

    (Pu1

    , Mu1

    ) NG, (Pu2

    , Mu2

    ) OK, (Pu3

    , Mu3

    ) NG

    |Mu1

    | < |Mu2

    | < |Mu3

    | with Pu

    = constP ( kN)

    Mx ( kNm)

    4500

    -1500

    45045 0

    (Pmax)(Pmax)

    (Pmin)(Pmin)

    123

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    14/30

    14

    P-M Diagram Factor

    Strength reduction factor = (t

    )

    t

    n

    n

    (c ) P

    usually( P )sometimes

    Compression

    controlled

    fy

    Es

    0.75 or 0.70.65

    Spiral*

    Other

    0.005

    Transition zone Tension

    Controlled

    0.9

    c

    1 c

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    15/30

    15

    P-M Diagram Factor

    Usually

    Sometimes

    n(c ) ( P ) n(c ) ( P )

    Sections with a narrow portionalong height, e.g.: I, L, T, U, C-

    shaped or irregular sections

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    16/30

    16

    P-M Diagram Factor

    (Pu1

    , Mu1

    ) OK, (Pu2

    , Mu2

    ) NG, (Pu3

    , Mu3

    ) OKMu1

    < Mu2

    < Mu3

    with Pu

    = const

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    17/30

    17

    P-M Diagram Factor

    (Pu1

    , Mu1

    ) OK, (Pu2

    , Mu2

    ) NG, (Pu3

    , Mu3

    ) OK

    |Mu1

    | < |Mu2

    | < |Mu3

    | with Pu

    = const

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    18/30

    18

    P-M Diagram Factor

    (Pu1

    , Mu1

    ) OK

    (Pu2

    , Mu2

    ) NG

    (Pu3

    , Mu3

    ) OK

    Pu1

    < Pu2

    < Pu3

    with Mu

    = const

    P (kip)

    Mx (k-ft)

    60000

    -10000

    7000070000

    fs=0.5fy

    fs=0

    fs=0.5fy

    fs=0

    (Pmax)(Pmax)

    (Pmin)(Pmin)

    fs=0.5fy

    fs=0

    fs=0.5fy

    fs=0

    123

    fs=0.5fy

    123

    t

    n

    n

    (c )M or

    ( M ) or

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    19/30

    19

    Uniaxial/Biaxial

    Symmetric Case

    3D failure surface with tips directly on the P axis

    Uniaxial X = Biaxial P-Mx

    with My = 0

    Uniaxial Y = Biaxial P-My

    with Mx

    = 0

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    20/30

    20

    Uniaxial/Biaxial

    Asymmetric case

    Tips of 3D failure surface may beoff the P axis

    Uniaxial X means N.A. parallel toX axis but this produces Mx

    0

    and My

    0

    Uniaxial X may be different than

    Biaxial P-Mx

    with My

    = 0

    c

    1 c

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    21/30

    21

    Uniaxial/Biaxial

    Asymmetric Case

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    22/30

    22

    Moment Magnification

    Sway Frames

    Magnification at column ends (Sway frames)

    M2

    = M2ns

    + s

    M2s

    If sign(M2ns

    ) = -sign(M2s

    ) then the magnified moment,

    M2

    , is smaller than first order moment (M2ns

    +M2s

    ) or it

    can even change sign, e.g.:

    M2ns

    = 16 k-ft, M2s

    = -10.0 k-ft, = 1.2 M2

    = 16 + 1.2 (-10.0) = 4.0 k-ft

    (M2ns

    +M2s

    ) = 6.0 k-ft

    M2ns

    = 16 k-ft, M2s

    = -14.4 k-ft,

    = 1.2

    M2

    = 16 + 1.2 (-14.4) = -1.28 k-ft (M2ns

    +M2s

    ) = 1.6 k-ft

    First-order moment may govern the design rather thansecond order-moment

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    23/30

    23

    Moment Magnification

    Sway Frames

    Since ACI 318-08

    moments in

    compression members

    in sway frames are

    magnified both at ends

    and along length

    Prior to ACI 318-08

    magnification along

    length applied only if

    u

    u

    'c g

    35

    r P

    f A

    l

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    24/30

    24

    Moment Magnification

    M

    1

    M1

    may govern thedesign rather than M2

    even though |M2

    | > |M1

    |

    and ACI 318, 10.10.6provision stipulates thatcompression membersshall be designed forMc

    = M2

    . Consider:

    Double curvature

    bending (M1

    /M2

    < 0)

    Asymmetric Section

    M2

    OK but

    M1 NG

    M

    P

    M2M1 M2M1

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    25/30

    25

    Moment Magnification

    M2nd/M1st

    ACI 318-11, 10.10.2.1 limits ratio of second-ordermoment to first-order moments

    M2nd/M1st < 1.4

    What if ratio is negative, e.g.:

    M1st

    = Mns

    + Ms

    = 10.0 + (-9.0) = 1.0 k-ft

    M2nd = (Mns

    + s

    Ms

    ) = 1.05 (10.0+1.3(-9.0)) = -1.78 k-ft

    M2nd/M1st

    = -1.78 OK or NG ?

    Check |M2nd/M1st|= 1.78 > 1.4 NG

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    26/30

    26

    Moment Magnification

    M2nd/M1st

    What if M1st

    is very small, i.e. M1st < Mmin

    , e.g.:

    M1st

    = M2

    = 0.1 k-ft (Nonsway frame)

    Mmin

    = Pu

    (0.6 +0.03h) = 5 k-ft

    M2nd = Mc

    = Mmin

    = 1.1*5 = 5.5 k-ft

    M2nd/M1st

    = 5.5/0.1 = 55 OK or NG ?

    Check M2nd/Mmin

    = 1.1 OK

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    27/30

    27

    Conclusions

    Summary

    Irregular shapes of sections and reinforcementpatterns lead to irregular and distortedinteraction diagrams

    Large number of load cases and loadcombinations lead to large number of load pointspotentially covering entire (P, Mx

    , My

    ) space

    Intuition may overlook unusual conditions in tallstructures

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    28/30

    28

    Conclusions

    Recommendations

    Do not eliminate load cases and combinationsbased on intuition

    Run biaxial rather than uniaxial analysis for

    asymmetric sections

    Run both 1st order and 2nd

    order analysis

    Apply engineering judgment rather than

    following general code provisions literally

    Use reliable software and verify its results

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    29/30

    29

  • 8/13/2019 Observation Sins Hear Wall Strength in Tall Buildings

    30/30

    30

    Call: +1-847-966-4357

    Email: [email protected]