objectives finish doas control –terminology –types of controllers differences –controls in the...

28
Objectives • Finish DOAS • Control – Terminology – Types of controllers • Differences – Controls in the real world • Problems • Response time vs. stability

Upload: alexia-goodman

Post on 21-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Objectives

• Finish DOAS

• Control – Terminology– Types of controllers

• Differences

– Controls in the real world• Problems

• Response time vs. stability

Page 2: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

www.doas.psu.eduDOAS with multi-split systems

Fresh air?

Page 3: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

DOAS fresh air configurations

Page 4: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

DOAS fresh air configurations

Page 5: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Issues Related to DOAS

• Split of sensible and latent load

• Selection of hydronic system

• Winter vs. summer operation – Winter operation with DX systems (heat pump)

Page 6: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Sequence of operation for the control system design

mixing

CCOA

RA

SAHC

Adiabatichumidifier

Define the sequence of operation for:WINTER operation and:

- case when humidity is not controlled- case when humidity is precisely controlled

Solution on the whiteboard

Page 7: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Economizer Fresh air volume flow rate control

mixing

damper

Fresh(outdoor) air

T & RH sensors

Recirc. air

% fresh air

Minimum for ventilation

100%

TOA (hOA)

enthalpy

Page 8: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Economizer – cooling regime

Example of SEQUENCE OF OERATIONS:

If TOA < Tset-point open the fresh air damper the maximum position

Then, if Tindoor air < Tset-point start closing the cooling coil valve

If cooling coil valve is closed and T indoor air < Tset-point start closing the damper till you get T indoor air = T set-point Other variations are possible

Page 9: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Basic purpose of HVAC control

Daily, weekly, and seasonal swings make HVAC control challenging

Highly unsteady-state environment

Provide balance of reasonable comfort at minimum cost and energy

Two distinct actions:

1) Switching/Enabling: Manage availability of plant according to schedule using timers.

2) Regulation: Match plant capacity to demand

Page 10: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Terminology

• Sensor– Measures quantity of

interest

• Controller– Interprets sensor data

• Controlled device– Changes based on

controller outputFigure 2-13

Page 11: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

DirectClosed Loop or Feedback

IndirectOpen Loop or Feedforward

outdoor

Page 12: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

• Set Point – Desired sensor value

• Control Point– Current sensor value

• Error or Offset– Difference between control point and set point

Page 13: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Two-Position Control Systems

• Used in small, relatively simple systems

• Controlled device is on or off– It is a switch, not a valve

• Good for devices that change slowly

Page 14: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

• Anticipator can be used to shorten response time• Control differential is also called deadband

Page 15: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Residential system - thermostat

• ~50 years old DDC thermostat

- Daily and weekly programming

Page 16: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Modulating Control Systems

Example: Heat exchanger control– Modulating (Analog) control

air

water

Cooling coil

(set point temperature)

x

Page 17: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Modulating Control Systems• Used in larger systems• Output can be anywhere in operating range• Three main types

– Proportional– PI– PID

Position (x)

fluid

Electric (pneumatic) motor

Vfluid = f(x) - linear or exponential function

Volume flow rate

Page 18: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

The PID control algorithm

For our example of heating coil:

Proportional Integral Differential

time

Position (x)

constants

e(t) – difference between set point and measured value

d

TTdTKdTT

T

KTTKx d

i

)()()( measuredpointset

measuredpointset measuredpointset

Proportional(how much)

Integral(for how long)

Differential(how fast)

Position of the valve

Page 19: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Proportional Controllers

x is controller output

A is controller output with no error

(often A=0)

Kis proportional gain constant

e = is error (offset)

)( measuredpointset TTKAx

measuredpointset TT

Page 20: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Stable systemUnstable system

Page 21: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Issues with P Controllers

• Always have an offset

• But, require less tuning than other controllers

• Very appropriate for things that change slowly– i.e. building internal temperature

Page 22: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Proportional + Integral (PI)

K/Ti is integral gain

If controller is tuned properly, offset is reduced to zero

Figure 2-18a

dTTT

KTTKAx

i

)()( measuredpointset measuredpointset

Page 23: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability
Page 24: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Issues with PI Controllers

• Scheduling issues

• Require more tuning than for P

• But, no offset

Page 25: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Proportional + Integral + Derivative (PID)

• Improvement over PI because of faster response and less deviation from offset– Increases rate of error correction as errors get larger

• But– HVAC controlled devices are too slow responding– Requires setting three different gains

Page 26: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

Ref: Kreider and Rabl.Figure 12.5

Page 27: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

The control in HVAC system – only PI

dTTT

KTTKx

i

)()( measuredpointset measuredpointset

Proportional Integral

Proportionalaffect the slope

Integralaffect the shape after the first “bump”

Set point

Set point

value

Page 28: Objectives Finish DOAS Control –Terminology –Types of controllers Differences –Controls in the real world Problems Response time vs. stability

The Real World

• 50% of US buildings have control problems– 90% tuning and optimization– 10% faults

• 25% energy savings from correcting control problems

• Commissioning is critically important