oaverview of ipcc reports kyoto, copenhagen, russia’s & america’s role, ipcc reports etc....

20
Oaverview of IPCC reports Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia Russia s & America s & America s Role, s Role, IPCC Reports etc. IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Upload: dwayne-watkins

Post on 18-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Oaverview of IPCC reportsOaverview of IPCC reports

Kyoto, Copenhagen,Kyoto, Copenhagen,RussiaRussia’’s & Americas & America’’s Role, s Role,

IPCC Reports etc.IPCC Reports etc.

June 2, 2014June 2, 2014

Return to Home Page

Page 2: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

IPCC - WGI

Source: Thompson et al. 2008.

ENSO = El Nino/Southern Oscillation

COWL= cold ocean, warm land

Page 3: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

IPCC - WGI

Source: Thompson et al., 2008.

Page 4: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

IPCC - WGI Source: Thompson e tal., 2008.

Page 5: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Observed Vs. modeled temperature rise since 1860

IPCC

Observed vs. modeled temperature riseObserved vs. modeled temperature rise since 1860since 1860

Page 6: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Computer Model Comparison of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing (red) vs. Only Natural Forcing (blue)

Figure 10.31

Page 7: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

IPCC - WGI

Understanding and Attributing Climate Change

Anthropogenic warming is likely discernible on all inhabited continents

Observed

Expected for all forcings

Natural forcing only

Page 8: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

1000Years

of CO2 and

Temperatures

Figure 10.29

Page 9: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Fig. 10.28 Global temperature trends, 1880-2003Annual & five-year means, the 0 baseline represents the 1951-1980 global average - which is 14ºC (52.2ºF).

Page 10: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Working Group I

Page 11: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Temperature trends

Page 12: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Temperature AnomaliesFigure 10.30

Page 13: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

10,000 Years of Greenhouse

Gases

Figure 10.32

Page 14: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Figure 10.34

Page 15: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

What’s in the pipeline and what could comeWarming will increase if GHG increase. If GHG were kept fixed at current levels, a committed 0.6°C of further warming would be expected by 2100. More warming would accompany more emission.

1.8oC = 3.2oF

2.8oC = 5.0oF

3.4oC = 6.1oF

CO2 Eq

850

600

4000.6oC = 1.0oF

Page 16: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Surface Temperature Projections

Figure 10.35

Page 17: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Changing winds, temperatures Changing winds, temperatures and storm tracksand storm tracks

• Anthropogenic forcing Anthropogenic forcing has has likelylikely contributed contributed to circulation changes to circulation changes (storm tracks, winds (storm tracks, winds and temperature and temperature patterns)patterns)

• Warmer, wetter Warmer, wetter winters in Norway; winters in Norway; drier in Spain (and drier in Spain (and North Africa)North Africa)

Source: IPCC 2007, Working Group 1, AR4 (Assessment Report 4).Source: IPCC 2007, Working Group 1, AR4 (Assessment Report 4).

Page 18: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

A1B is a typical “business as usual” (2090-2099) scenario: Global mean warming 2.8oC;

Much of land area warms by ~3.5oCArctic warms by ~7oC; would be less for less emission

Page 19: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Projections of Future Changes in Climate

New in AR4: Drying in much of the subtropics, more rain in higher latitudes, continuing the broad pattern of rainfall changes already observed.

Page 20: Oaverview of IPCC reports Kyoto, Copenhagen, Russia’s & America’s Role, IPCC Reports etc. June 2, 2014 Return to Home Page

Emissions & StabilizationWedges