o l ssu e 1, spl an ar c h 2015 issn : 2230-7109 (online ... · iject vo l. 6, issu e 1, spl - 1...

4
IJECT VOL. 6, ISSUE 1, SPL- 1 JAN - MARCH 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print) www.iject.org 152 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY On a Single Loop Optoelectronic Oscillator Using Variable Centre Frequency Dynamic Filter 1 A Mukherjee, 2 D Ghosh, 3 N R Das, 4 B N Biswas 1 Dept. of ECE, Central Institute of Technology, Kokrajhar, Assam, India 2 Dept. of ECE, Siliguri Institute of Technology, Siliguri, West Bengal, India 3 Institute of Radio Physics & Electronics, Calcutta University, Kolkata, WB, India 4 Education Division, SKF Group of Institutions, Mankundu, Hooghly, WB, India Abstract The present paper considers the influence of a variable center frequency tuned circuit replacing the narrowband RF filter in a conventional optoelectronic oscillator. The free-running amplitude and normalized frequency of such a system are derived and theoretical analysis coupled with experimental results showing good agreement are presented. Finally, the frequency control arrangement for such a system in response to an angle modulated signal is reported. Keywords Optoelectronic Oscillator, Mach-Zehnder Modulator, Dynamic Filter, Fiber Delay, Lock Range I. Introduction The Optoelectronic Oscillator (OEO) has attracted many researchers because of its ability to generate high purity low phase noise microwave and optical signal. OEO was first proposed by M Nakazawa, T Nakashima and M Tokuda [1] in 1984. The application covers a wide area of photonic and RF systems such as microwave frequency standards, radars, RF photonics and optical signal processing [2-3]. Incidentally OEO owes its origin to the delay-line oscillators of seventies. An OEO is similar to that of the Barkhausen’s oscillator. In the Barkhausen’s oscillator, the flux of electrons from the cathode to the anode is controlled by the potential on the inverting grid and thus this potential is affected by the feedback current in the anode circuit comprising a resonant network. The function of the grid is replaced by an electrical-optical (E/O) converter, the function of the anode by an optical-electrical (O/E) converter, and finally the energy-storage function of the LC circuit by a long optical delay line. Namely, the oscillator converts the continuous light energy to an RF (radio frequency) signal. LASER Mach Zehender Modulator Photo Current Fiber Delay Line Photons Injection Bias Optical Output Electrical Output Electrical Injection RF Amplifier Narrowband RF Filter RF Coupler Photo Diode Sync In this paper, the narrowband RF filter was replaced by a tuned circuit whose centre frequency can be varied by the application of a dc control voltage. It is worthwhile to note that the modified OEO with dynamic filter is capable of tracking the instantaneous frequency of a frequency modulated signal. The input/output governing equation for the dynamic tuned circuit along with the closed-loop equation for the OEO was derived. Expressions for the steady-state amplitude and normalized frequency was presented. Theoretical analysis coupled with experimental findings were presented and they were in good agreement. Finally, the tracking capability of the OEO with reference to an angle modulated signal was studied with particular emphasis on the variation of the lock range with injection signal strength. Laser Source RF input Mach-Zehnder Optical Modulator output Optical input Fiber delay Photdetector Dynamic filter Out In RF Gain RF Out Intensity modulated Optical output Fig. 1: Conventional Single Loop OEO Using RF Filter and Modified OEO Using Dynamic Filter II. Theoretical Analysis If ‘ 1 G ’ is the gain of a second order tuned circuit, then the transfer function can be written as [5-6] , ‘ () xt ’ and ‘ () yt being the input and the output to the transfer function respectively. Again if ‘ ’ is the frequency detuning term then one can get ; assuming zero initial condition. This equation is utilized for the design of the variable centre frequency tuned circuit, henceforth referred to as 'dynamic filter'. For the single loop OEO, if the stationary wave signal is of the form ; ‘ 2 G ’ is the gain of the RF amplifier in the OEO loop and ‘ () 0 v t ’ is the RF output from the photo-detector , then the closed loop equation can be written as [4], [6] (1) where ;

Upload: others

Post on 21-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: o l ssu E 1, spl an ar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online ... · IJECT Vo l. 6, Issu E 1, spl - 1 Jan - Mar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print) 152 InternatIonal

IJECT Vol. 6, IssuE 1, spl- 1 Jan - MarCh 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print)

w w w . i j e c t . o r g 152 InternatIonal Journal of electronIcs & communIcatIon technology

On a Single Loop Optoelectronic Oscillator Using Variable Centre Frequency Dynamic Filter

1A Mukherjee, 2D Ghosh, 3N R Das, 4B N Biswas1Dept. of ECE, Central Institute of Technology, Kokrajhar, Assam, India

2Dept. of ECE, Siliguri Institute of Technology, Siliguri, West Bengal, India3Institute of Radio Physics & Electronics, Calcutta University, Kolkata, WB, India

4Education Division, SKF Group of Institutions, Mankundu, Hooghly, WB, India

AbstractThe present paper considers the influence of a variable center frequency tuned circuit replacing the narrowband RF filter in a conventional optoelectronic oscillator. The free-running amplitude and normalized frequency of such a system are derived and theoretical analysis coupled with experimental results showing good agreement are presented. Finally, the frequency control arrangement for such a system in response to an angle modulated signal is reported.

KeywordsOptoelectronic Oscillator, Mach-Zehnder Modulator, Dynamic Filter, Fiber Delay, Lock Range

I. IntroductionThe Optoelectronic Oscillator (OEO) has attracted many researchers because of its ability to generate high purity low phase noise microwave and optical signal. OEO was first proposed by M Nakazawa, T Nakashima and M Tokuda [1] in 1984. The application covers a wide area of photonic and RF systems such as microwave frequency standards, radars, RF photonics and optical signal processing [2-3]. Incidentally OEO owes its origin to the delay-line oscillators of seventies. An OEO is similar to that of the Barkhausen’s oscillator. In the Barkhausen’s oscillator, the flux of electrons from the cathode to the anode is controlled by the potential on the inverting grid and thus this potential is affected by the feedback current in the anode circuit comprising a resonant network. The function of the grid is replaced by an electrical-optical (E/O) converter, the function of the anode by an optical-electrical (O/E) converter, and finally the energy-storage function of the LC circuit by a long optical delay line. Namely, the oscillator converts the continuous light energy to an RF (radio frequency) signal.

LASER

Mach Zehender Modulator

Photo Current

Fiber Delay Line

Photons Injection

Bias

Optical Output

Electrical Output

Electrical Injection

RF Amplifier

Narrowband RF Filter

RF Coupler

Photo Diode

Sync

In this paper, the narrowband RF filter was replaced by a tuned circuit whose centre frequency can be varied by the application of a dc control voltage. It is worthwhile to note that the modified

OEO with dynamic filter is capable of tracking the instantaneous frequency of a frequency modulated signal. The input/output governing equation for the dynamic tuned circuit along with the closed-loop equation for the OEO was derived. Expressions for the steady-state amplitude and normalized frequency was presented. Theoretical analysis coupled with experimental findings were presented and they were in good agreement. Finally, the tracking capability of the OEO with reference to an angle modulated signal was studied with particular emphasis on the variation of the lock range with injection signal strength.

Laser Source

RF input

Mach-Zehnder OpticalModulator output

Optical input

Fiber delay

PhotdetectorDynamic filter

Out InRF Gain

RF Out

Intensity modulated Optical output

Fig. 1: Conventional Single Loop OEO Using RF Filter and Modified OEO Using Dynamic Filter

II. Theoretical Analysis

If ‘ 1G ’ is the gain of a second order tuned circuit, then the transfer function can be written as [5-6]

, ‘ ( )x t ’ and ‘ ( )y t ’

being the input and the output to the transfer function respectively. Again if ‘ ’ is the frequency detuning term then one can get

;

assuming zero initial condition. This equation is utilized for the design of the variable centre frequency tuned circuit, henceforth referred to as 'dynamic filter'. For the single loop OEO, if the stationary wave signal is of the form ; ‘ 2G ’ is the gain of the RF amplifier in the OEO loop and ‘ ( )0v t’ is the RF output from the photo-detector , then the closed loop equation can be written as [4], [6]

(1)

where ;

Page 2: o l ssu E 1, spl an ar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online ... · IJECT Vo l. 6, Issu E 1, spl - 1 Jan - Mar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print) 152 InternatIonal

IJECT Vol. 6, IssuE 1, spl-1 Jan - MarCh 2015

w w w . i j e c t . o r g InternatIonal Journal of electronIcs & communIcatIon technology 153

ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print)

and

It is not difficult to show that the substitution of the above results in (1) gives

(2)Here 1 2.G G G= is the overall gain and in the free-running case,

1 0w w≈ . Equating the real part of (2) one gets the amplitude equation as

(3)Similarly, the imaginary part of (2) gives the phase equation

(4)

In the steady-state, 0dVdt

= and using the weakly varying assumptions

i.e., since ‘ ( )V t & ’ are slowly varying functions of time,

and ( )1 1dV

V t dt <<

,

Hence it is not difficult to show the steady-state voltage as

(5)

and the normalized free-running frequency as

(6)

III. Results and Discussions

Fig. 2: Frequency Response of the Dynamic Filter

Fig. 3: Frequency Detuning With Centre Frequency Shift of the Dynamic Filter

Fig. 4: RF Spectrum

0 5 106× 1 107× 1.5 107× 2 107×1

1.1

1.2

Normalised frequency with frequency detuning

Frequency detuning in MHz ---->

Nor

mal

ised

freq

uenc

y --

-->

Fig. 5: Theoretical Variation of Normalized Frequency With Frequency Detuning

Page 3: o l ssu E 1, spl an ar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online ... · IJECT Vo l. 6, Issu E 1, spl - 1 Jan - Mar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print) 152 InternatIonal

IJECT Vol. 6, IssuE 1, spl- 1 Jan - MarCh 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print)

w w w . i j e c t . o r g 154 InternatIonal Journal of electronIcs & communIcatIon technology

0 5 10 9−× 1 10 8−× 1.5 10 8−×0.992

0.994

0.996

0.998

1

OEO with ILOOEO with BPF

Normalised frequency with fiber delay

Fiber delay in nanoseconds ---->

Nor

mal

ised

frequ

ency

---->

Fig. 6: Theoretical Variation of Normalized Frequency With Fiber Delay

The experimental validations and the theoretical verifications were obtained using MATLAB SIMULINK and MATHCADTM respectively. The proposed dynamic filter was inserted in place of the narrowband RF filter in a conventional single loop OEO shown in Fig. 1. The frequency response of the dynamic filter was shown in Fig. 2, and Fig. 3 shows the linear variation of the centre frequency of the dynamic filter with the frequency detuning ( )w∆Fig. 2 shows that the dynamic filter is having a peak response at 12.0 MHz. To observe the linear variation of the detuning frequency with the shift in centre frequency of the dynamic filter, an RF gain of 2.0 and quality factor of 76.9 was used. In fig.5, the centre frequency of the OEO was 11.92 MHz, fibre delay was 10 nanosecond and the quality factor of the dynamic filter was 76.9, while in Fig. 6, a frequency deviation of 11.9 MHz was chosen. While taking the Fast Fourier transform of the RF output obtained from the single loop OEO shown in Fig. 4, an overall gain of 6.0 and a frequency deviation of 0 MHz were used. Figures 7 and 9 are the experimental verifications of the theoretical results shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 5 respectively. The experimental validation of (5) was shown in Fig. 8. Moreover in Fig. 6 the variation of normalized frequency with delay was compared with that of a conventional OEO incorporating band-pass filter. Finally, the modified OEO is synchronized with a frequency modulated wave. The dynamic filter adjusts its centre frequency in such a way that the centre frequency becomes equal to the instantaneous frequency of the modulated signal. Once synchronized, the variation of the lock range of the OEO with injection amplitude was shown in Fig. 10. Table 1 presents the experimental data for Fig. 7 and 8 respectively, while table 2 was that for Fig. 9.

Table 1: Experimental dataRF Gain = 3, Free-running frequency = 11.92 MHz, Q-factor = 76.9Fiber delay in nsec

Normalized amplitude

Normalized frequency

1.0 1 13.0 0.989 0.9995.0 0.97 0.9987.0 0.94 0.9979.0 0.89 0.99510.0 0.858 0.994

Table 2: Frequency detuning in MHz Normalized frequency0.5 1.0411.0 1.0831.5 1.1242.0 1.1662.5 1.207

Fig. 7: Experimental Variation of Normalized Frequency With Fiber Delay

Fig. 8: Experimental Verification of Normalized Amplitude With Fiber Delay

Fig. 9: Experimental Verification of Frequency Detuning With Normalized Frequency

Page 4: o l ssu E 1, spl an ar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online ... · IJECT Vo l. 6, Issu E 1, spl - 1 Jan - Mar C h 2015 ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print) 152 InternatIonal

IJECT Vol. 6, IssuE 1, spl-1 Jan - MarCh 2015

w w w . i j e c t . o r g InternatIonal Journal of electronIcs & communIcatIon technology 155

ISSN : 2230-7109 (Online) | ISSN : 2230-9543 (Print)

Fig. 10: Experimental Verification of Lock Range With Injection Amplitude

IV. ConclusionWe have theoretically and experimentally demonstrated the performance of a single-loop OEO using dynamic filter in place of a conventional RF filter. System equations of the modified OEO have been derived. Theoretical analyses coupled with experimental findings are in good agreement.

V. AcknowledgementThe authors are thankful to the management of Central Institute of Technology, Assam, India for giving an opportunity for carrying out this work and also the management of Sir J C Bose School of Engineering for carrying out the work on Sir J C Bose Creativity Centre of Supreme Knowledge Foundation Group of Institution, Mankundu, Hooghly.

References[1] Nakazawa M., Nakashima T., Tokuda M.,“An optoelectronic

self-oscillatory circuit with an optical fiber delayed feedback and its injection locking technique”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 719–730, 1984.

[2] Yao X. S., Maleki L., Eliyahu D.,“Progress in the opto-electronic oscillator - a ten year anniversary review”, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Vol. 1, pp. 287-290, 2004.

[3] Yao X. S., Maleki L.,“High frequency optical subcarrier generator”, Electronic Letters, Vol. 30, No. 78, September, 1994.

[4] Biswas B.N., et al.,“Injection Locked Tunable Filters and Amplifiers”, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems, Vol. CAS-27, No. 9, pp. 833-836, September 1980.

[5] Biswas B. N., Chatterjee S., Pal S.,“Laser Induced Microwave Oscillator”, IJECET, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 211-219, 2012.

[6] Mukherjee A., Chatterjee S., Das N. R., Biswas B. N.,“Laser induced microwave oscillator under the influence of interference”, International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, Cambridge University Press, 2014, in press.