nvh analysis of car cabin compartment
TRANSCRIPT
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 317
NVH Analysis of Car Cabin Compartment
Sidramappagoud Patil1, G. U. Raju2, Chetanakumar Chavan3
Research Scholars1,3, Associate Professor2
School of Mechanical Engineering
KLE Technology University, Hubballi, Karnataka
Abstract: The lightening of the vehicles body structure aggravates the noise, vibration and harshness (NVH). Since the noise,
vibration and harshness performance affect the overall image of vehicles, therefore now these are considered as important
factors in the entire vehicle design process. Now days, the global approach of vehicle’s quality is important by its interior
noise as well as vibration characteristics. NVH is a process that desires the integration of customer device confidence with
the design and improvement process. The surface modelling is accomplished for the vehicle body in CATIA and meshed in
HYPERMESH tool. Then, modal analysis in a frequency range between 0-50 Hz is done by NASTRAN. By observing both
natural frequency and the mode shapes it is found that the Eigen frequency and the working frequency (50Hz) are not same,
so resonance is not occurring for this condition. In response analysis (steady state dynamic analysis), Sound pressure level
is within 60 dB in all four responses ID. Hence, NVH analysis for car cabin compartment is satisfactory.FEA model chosen
gives good results related to NVH analysis. Analysis results of deflection are compared with theoretical results, it is found
that percentage error are in permissible limits to validate the model. We are expressive into a time of maximum awareness
of environmental aspect as well as cars that reflect a genial life style and aesthetic.
Keywords: Car cabin compartment, HYPERMESH, NASTRAN, Modal analysis, Steady state dynamic analysis
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. INTRODUCTION
Now days, the global approach of vehicle’s quality is important by its interior noise as well as vibration characteristics. Present
day’s driver has come to forecast smooth and peaceful ride in entire operating condition. So the interest on NVH characteristics has
turned into popular. When vehicles noise as well as vibration eclipse the driver expectation, hence the vehicle’s market comedown.
NVH is a process that desires the integration of customer device confidence with the design and improvement process. Noise,
vibration and harshness are examined few of the huge challenges that automotive engineers look in industry and are one of the huge
customer warranty objection. Interior NVH approach with noise and vibration accomplished by the occupier of the cabin, while
exterior NVH is generally worried with the noise diffuse by the car. The modern design procedure is starting to study NVH problems
thought the entire design process. This includes integrating extensive design, simulation, evaluation and optimization methods
inside the design process to secure both noise and vibration satisfaction. The society for automotive engineers (SAE) is a series of
teaching courses attention on important areas inside the automobile that provides to the problems that consumer with their cars.
Noise is defined as an unpleasant sound generated by any vibrating body. The terms used to describe the noise are as below in NVH
applications. Road noise exists, while driving on a roughly paved roads or gravel. This type of noise is continuous and has a constant
character. If two sound sources of same pitch and slightly different frequency over laps each other, occurrence of beat noise will be
seen. Brake squeal occurs when friction is created between the brake components during braking. Droning is experienced while
driving in to a tunnel at high speed, or climbing to a high altitude caused due to the change in atmospheric pressure. The human
audible range of sound varies from 20 Hz to 20000 Hz. Shake occurs at the steering wheel, seat and annoying vibration at the floor.
Vibration that causes the steering wheel to oscillate and sometimes even the body of the vehicle vibrates laterally. Shudder transmits
through brake hydraulic lines to steering system, suspension system and brake pedal. Pedal pulsation generates during application
of brake. The noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) accomplishment influence the total picture of car. These are expressed as
valuable factors in whole car design process, commitment to develop the model for safety and comfort intention. Carry out Beat,
Brake squeal, Shimmy, Shudder analysis and reduce the vibration of car.
2. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.1 Properties of steel
The important element of choosing material especially for frame is broad collection of characteristics like as chemical, thermal and
mechanical resistance, comfort of production and lifespan. We need to select a material along these Features; Steel is the best
valuable choice. There is more improvements in irons and steels from proceed set of decades that fashioned the steel more light-
weight, powerful, stiffer also developing other performance features. Decline in a frame structure that has better strength and
structural fulfillment. Equivalent mass decrement also other advantage managed for doors, hoods, and the hatchbacks. The prime
explanation behind utilizing steel in the body structure is its characteristic capacity to retain affect vitality in a crash circumstance.
2.2 Properties of structural steel
Structural steel is Greater flexibility and Adaptability of body work to development of use, Booming useful life of vehicle. Structural
steel has High stiffness, toughness, and ductile properties.
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 318
2.3 Properties of glass
The significance attributes of glass are straight forwardness, warm opposition and synthetic obstruction and breaking opposition.
Contrary to strong collections of crystalline structure, glass has no characterized liquefying point. It ceaselessly changes from the
strong state to the plastic state.
Table 1: Material properties of model
Material Young’s Modulus
GPA
Poisson’s Ratio
Density
Kg/m3
Steel 210 0.280 7800
Structural steel 210 0.280 7800
Glass 80 0.250 2800
Fig 1: Material view of model
3. MESH QUALITY
The grid of a finite element system represents a geometric object as a set of finite elements. In computational arrangements of
fractional differential conditions, fitting is a discrete portrayal of the geometry that is associated with the issue. Basically, it segments
space into components (or cells or zones) over which the conditions can be approximated. Zone limits can be allowed to make
computationally best molded zones, or they can be settled to speak to interior or outside limits inside a model. Cross section quality
can be definitively dictated by in view of the rate of joining, arrangement precision and CPU time required.FE demonstrating is
done in HYPERMESH V12 programming since it is devoted programming for finish pre-preparing action, for example, coinciding
(Discretization) of complex geometry, material properties appointing, sectional properties doling out and applying limit conditions
and so on can finished no sweat.
Fig 2: Mesh quality of model
Table 2: Mesh quality of model
Element Type War
page
Jacobian Aspect
Ratio
Skew Min
length
Max
length
Min
angle
Max
angle
CQUAD 05 0.7 5 60 7.5 20 45 135
CTRIA NA NA 5 60 7.5 20 20 120
The FE model quality has great influence on the results and computational efficiency of FE analysis.
Grid density and Boundary layer mesh.
Adjacent cell length/volume proportions.
Skewness.
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 319
4. DIFFERENT VIEWS OF CAR CABIN COMPARTMENT
Fig 3: Property view of model Fig 4: Isometric views of vehicle trim body
Fig 5: Trim connection overview of model Fig 6: Sealing of model
Sealing or weather strip purpose RBE3 and RBE2 celas are used
Stiffness of spring selected as 10 N/mm based on data hand book
Contact method used for sealing using connection using RBE2
RBE2 – uniformly to dependent nodes
RBE3 – load distribution depend on distance
5. ANALYSIS OF CAR CABIN COMPARTMENT
5.1. Analysis performing on car cabin compartment
In the car cabin structure we are interested to know about the behaviour of the NVH. So we have performed the following analysis
on NVH of car cabin compartment.
1. Modal analysis
2. Response analysis(Steady state dynamic analysis)
5.2. Modal analysis of Car cabin compartment
Modular examination is the dynamic investigation, completed to discover the dynamic conduct of the structure. The objective of
modular examination in basic mechanics is to decide the common mode shapes and frequencies of structure amid free vibration.
Usually to utilize the limited component strategy (FEM) to play out this examination since, as different estimations utilizing the
FEM, the protest being broke down can have self-assertive shape and the aftereffects of the counts are adequate. The kinds of
conditions which emerge from modular investigation are those found in Eigen frame works. The physical elucidation of the Eigen
esteems and eigenvectors which originate from tackling the framework are that they speak to the frequencies and comparing mode
shapes. Here and there, the main wanted modes are the least frequencies since they can be the most conspicuous modes at which
the protest will vibrate, ruling all the higher repeated modes.
5.2.1. Output Extracted From The Modal Analysis
Mode shape
Natural frequency and
Assembly integrity
5.2.2. The car working frequency
The engine runs at 3000 rpm
Frequency =3000
60 = 50 Hz
So to carry out modal analysis we need to concentrate about working frequency. Natural frequency or Eigen frequency should not
fall with working frequency.
5.2.3. Boundary condition
The modular examination is completed in free- free condition so the car cabin compartment is able to move in all direction i.e. all
the 6 degrees of freedoms are not constrained.
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 320
5.2.4. Mode shapes and Frequency of modal analysis
Fig 7: Mode 1 Fig 8: Mode 2
Fig 9: Mode 3 Fig 10: Mode 4
Fig 11: Mode 5 Fig 9: Mode 6
Fig 10: Mode 7 Fig 11: Mode 8
Fig 12: Mode 9 Fig 13: Mode 10
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 321
5.2.5. Natural frequency of modal analysis
Table 2: Natural frequencies of modal analysis
Mode No Working Frequency
(Hz)
Natural frequency
(Hz)
1 50 0.000115
2 50 0.000072
3 50 0.000053
4 50 0.000025
5 50 0.000056
6 50 0.000064
7 50 12.0
8 50 15.7
9 50 16.3
By observing both natural frequency and the mode shapes it is concluded that the Eigen frequency and the working frequency
(50Hz) are not same, so resonance is not occurring for this condition.
5.3. Steady state dynamic analysis of Car cabin compartment
In steady state dynamic analysis we are concentrating sound pressure level with respect to unit excitation of four responses Id.
5.3.1. Boundary condition
In this analysis, both the front as well as rear shock mountings are constrained in all the direction i.e. all six degree of freedoms is
fixed. Load was applied at the position of the driver (Response ID 2000001) locating in the car cabin compartment. In this analysis
unit (1N) force is applied at the response ID 2000001, response ID2000002, response ID 2000003, response ID 2000004 and we
have to reduce the sound pressure level below 60 dB with respect to working frequency 50 Hz with respect to all response ID.
Fig 14: Boundary condition for model
Table 3: Sound pressure levels for Response ID
Response ID Speed (RPM) Frequency (Hz) Sound pressure level
(dB)
2000001 3000 50 56
2000002 3000 50 56
2000003 3000 50 58
2000004 3000 50 58
From the above it is observed that sound pressure level is within 60 dB in all four responses ID. Hence, NVH analysis for car cabin
compartment is satisfactory. FEA model chosen gives good results related to NVH analysis.
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 322
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
6.1. Modal analysis of car cabin compartment
i. Results
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
5
10
15
20
25N
atur
al fr
eque
ncy,
Hz
Modes Fig 15: Modes v/s Natural frequency
ii. Conclusion:
By observing the graph, it is found that first six modes are having approximately zero frequency because analysis is
executed for free- free condition i.e. the car cabin compartment is able to move in all six directions. Also, from the analyses
it is found that Natural frequency and working frequency are not matching with each other. Therefore resonance is not
occurring and the car cabin compartment is safe.
6.2. Steady state dynamic analysis of car cabin compartment
i. Results
Fig 16. Sound pressure level for Response ID 2000001
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 323
Fig 17. Sound pressure level for Response ID 2000002
Fig 18. Sound pressure level for Response ID 2000003
Fig 19. Sound pressure level for Response ID 2000004
From the above it is observed that sound pressure level is within 60 dB in all four responses ID. Hence, NVH analysis for car
cabin compartment is satisfactory.FEA model chosen gives good results related to NVH analysis.
ISSN: 2455-2631 © July 2018 IJSDR | Volume 3, Issue 7
IJSDR1807053 International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) www.ijsdr.org 324
7. Conclusion
The present study is related to analysis and improvement of a car cabin compartment structure based on NVH behaviour. The
surface modelling is accomplished for the vehicle body in CATIA and meshed in HYPERMESH tool. The quality of mesh is good
enough for analysis of model. Then, modal analysis in a frequency range between 0-50 Hz is done by NASTRAN. By observing
both natural frequency and the mode shapes it is found that the Natural frequency and the working frequency (50Hz) are not same,
so resonance is not occurring for this condition. In response analysis (steady state dynamic analysis), both the front as well as rear
shock mountings are constrained in all the direction i.e. all six degree of freedom is fixed. Sound pressure level is within 60 dB in
all four responses ID. Analysis results of deflection are compared with theoretical results, it is found that percentage error are in
permissible limits to validate the model. Hence, NVH analysis for car cabin compartment is satisfactory.FEA model chosen gives
good results related to NVH analysis.
References
[1] Eckermann, Erik.“ World History of the Automobile”. SAE Press, ISBN 0-7680-0800-X (2001)
[2] Georgano, G. N. “Cars: Early and Vintage 1886-1930”. London: Grange-Universal, (1985)
[3] Seidel, Winfried A.“Carl Benz: eine badische Geschichte; die Vision vom pferdelosen Wagen" verändert die
Welt”.Weinheim: Ed. Diesbach. ISBN 3-936468-29-X (2005)
[4] Hockman, Hilary. “Edwardian House Style: An Architectural and Interior Design Source Book” David and Charles PLC
Publications ISBN: 978-0-7153-1227-8
[5] Jaafarnia, Mohsen. “Form and Space in Industrial Design” Tehran: Sima ye Danesh Publications, ISBN 964-8972-28-1
(2007)
[6] Benyus, Janine. “Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature”. New York, USA: William Morrow &Company, ISBN 978-
0688160999 (1997)
[7] Shahram, Mohammad Azad, Farshad. “NVH analysis and improvement of a vehicle body structure using DOE method”,
Journal of mechanical science and technology, Vol 4, pp 2980-2989 (2009)
[8] Ying Yang, Guangyao, Dongbo, Xiaobin. “Mode calculation and testing of a car Body in white”, shock and vibration, Vol
18, pp 289-298 (2011)
[9] Eskezia, Abera, Daniel. “Finite element analysis of internal door panel of a car by considering Bamboo fiber reinforced
epoxy composite”, Journal of applied mechanical engineering, Vol 6, pp 68-73 (2011)
[10] Deshmukh, Chaitanya, Sachin. “Case study on sandwich steel application in automotive BIW for NVH improvements”,
Journal of mechanical and civil engineering, Vol 78-84, pp 01-06 (2015)
[11] C. R. Fredo, Anders Hendlund. “NVH optimization of truck cab floor panel embossing pattern”, SAE technical paper, Vol
23, pp 23-27 (2005)
[12] Sang Hyun Jee, Jong Yi. “The application of the simulation techniques to reduce the noise and vibration in vehicle
development”, Automotive innovation for the new millennium, Vol 15, pp 12-15 (2000)
[13] Jianhui Luo, Zhou Dinglu. “Torsion stiffness analysis and optimization of BIW”, Computer aided engineering, Vol 8, pp
80-90 (2005)
[14] L. P. R. De Oliveria, Wim Desmet. “Active sound quality control of engine induced cavity noise”, Science direct, Vol 43,
pp 476-488 (2009)
[15] Adel Mohammed, Dhahebi, Ahmad Junoh, Zamri. “A computational approach for optimizing vehicles’ interior noise and
vibration”, International journal of automotive and mechanical engineering, Vol 16, pp 90-95 (2017)
[16] Praveen Padagannavour. “The designed and analyzed the concept model for a Hatchback”, Science direct, Vol 32, pp 615-
620 (2016)
[17] Maria, Panza. “A review of experimental techniques for NVH analysis on a commercial vehicle”, science direct, Vol 15,
pp 17-23 (2015)