numerical simulations of silverpit crater collapse: a comparison of tekton and sales 2 gareth...

23
Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Upload: gary-mitchell

Post on 03-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse:

A Comparison ofTEKTON and SALES 2

Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and

Jay Melosh

LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Page 2: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Silverpit(Stewart and Allen, 2002)

(Allen and Stewart, 2003)

Page 3: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Objectives

• Understand Silverpit• Ring formation

• Compare 2 modeling techniques to assess:• Consistency• Limitations• Degree to which they are complementary

Page 4: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Finite-Element Method• Model structure as an assemblage of elements

bounded by nodes• Specify:

• Geometry• Material properties and rheologies• Boundary and initial conditions

• Construct system of equations:• Solve simultaneously for displacements at nodes• Calculate stresses using constitutive equations

vf = K

v d

Page 5: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Finite-element Method: Rheology• Elastic

• Newtonian

• Power-law

• Plastic• < c: power-law; ≥ c: Newtonian

• Exponential

ε =σE

˙ ε = Aσ n exp −H

RT

⎛ ⎝ ⎜

⎞ ⎠ ⎟

˙ ε = A' exp −H

RT1 −

σ

σ p

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

2 ⎛

⎝ ⎜ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ ⎟

˙ ε =σ

η

Page 6: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Lagrangian Hydrocode Method• Model structure as a regular grid of cells

bounded by nodes• Specify:

• Geometry• Material properties• Boundary and initial conditions

• Calculate all forces acting on each cell.• Assuming forces constant for time step,

compute node displacements:

vx =

v f i∑

mΔt2

Page 7: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Lagrangian Hydrocode: Rheology

• Elastic

• Newtonian fluid flow

• Plastic• < Y: elastic; ≥ Y: Newtonian• Yield strength Y may be a function of pressure,

pressure vibrations, damage and internal energy.

ε =σE

˙ ε =σ

η

Page 8: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON (Finite-Element)

• Lagrangian

• Complex rheology

• Limited strength

• Faults

• No inertia

• Lagrangian

• Limited rheology

• Complex strength

• No faulting

• Inertia

SALES-2 (Hydrocode)

Page 9: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 10: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 11: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 12: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 13: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 14: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 15: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

Page 16: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh

Page 17: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh

Page 18: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh

Page 19: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh

Page 20: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona
Page 21: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona
Page 22: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona
Page 23: Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

Results

• Central, near-surface, deformation differs• Comparable uplift at depth, few hundred m• Timescales for deformation differ• Magnitudes and orientations of surface

stresses outside of crater are consistent• Stress orientations and consequently fault

types are broadly consistent with Silverpit observations