ntsb asiana 214 hearing: roger cox, operational factors presentation

Upload: kgoradio

Post on 14-Oct-2015

80 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

NTSB Asiana 214 Hearing: Roger Cox, Operational Factors Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • Operational Factors

    Senior Air Safety Investigator

    Asiana Flight 214, B777 San Francisco, CA July 6, 2013

  • Profile View of Approach

    2

  • Navigation Display (ND)

    3

  • Altitude Range Arc

    4

  • Vertical Path Indicator

    5

  • Final Approach Before FLCH Selected

    6

  • Final Approach Before FLCH Selected

    7

  • Final Approach

    PM delayed setting flaps 30 PF selected FLCH SPD just

    before the PM selected flaps 30 PF did not call out mode change Autoflight system began a climb

    8

  • Final Approach: FLCH SPD Selected

    9

  • Final Approach

    PF counteracted the commanded climb by disconnecting the A/P and moving thrust levers to idle

    The A/T mode switched to HOLD

    10

  • Final Approach: A/T in HOLD mode

    11

  • Final Approach

    PF flight director off PFs F/D off and PMs F/D on, but

    only after turning both F/Ds off Never off at the same time Would have put A/T in SPD mode

    and controlled airspeed 12

  • Cycling F/D Switches

    Cycling F/Ds an informal practice Done on circling but not visual

    approaches When A/P and both F/Ds are off,

    A/T resets to SPD mode No mention in 777 FCOM/FCTM

    13

  • Final Approach

    Flight passed through a 3 glidepath at about 500 feet

    Stabilized approach criteria not met

    Descent rate 1,200 fpm, throttles remained at idle

    No 500 foot callouts 14

  • Final Approach

    PM speed at 90 ft and 110 knots PM added go-around thrust Column full aft Stick shaker activated Airplane did not have the

    performance to go around at that point

    15

  • Visual Approach Training

    PFs first visual approach without glideslope outside simulator

    PF stressed about visual approach with no glideslope

    Simulator practice unlike accident scenario

    16

  • Instructor Pilot Training

    The PF needed more active coaching

    PM did not intervene in time PMs simulator training very

    structured No trainee supervised during

    instructor Operating Experience (OE)

    17

  • Manual Flight

    Asiana policy was maximum use of automation

    Autopilot usually left on to 1,000 ft Sometimes manual flight needed FAA has addressed need for more

    manual flight SAFO 13002 New required Part 121 training

    18

  • Manual Flight

    PF did not trim below 170 knots PF was experienced but lacked

    critical flying skills More manual flying would improve

    pilots ability to cope with maneuvering changes

    19

  • Operational FactorsProfile View of ApproachNavigation Display (ND)Altitude Range ArcVertical Path IndicatorFinal Approach Before FLCH SelectedFinal Approach Before FLCH SelectedFinal ApproachFinal Approach: FLCH SPD SelectedFinal ApproachFinal Approach: A/T in HOLD modeFinal ApproachCycling F/D SwitchesFinal ApproachFinal ApproachVisual Approach TrainingInstructor Pilot TrainingManual FlightManual FlightSlide Number 20