NSP1 Summary ReportThrough Third Quarter 2012

1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS BY UNIT TYPE ACTUAL VS. PROJECTED

PROJECTED*

ACTUAL

TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 49,834

TOTAL ACQUISITION: 4,904

TOTAL CLEARANCE / DEMO: 21,992

TOTAL HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE: 8,349

TOTAL REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION: 14,589

0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%

State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

Actual

Projected

0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000

Actual

Projected

State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected

0

5000

10000

15000

20000Actual

Projected

Single FamilyMultifamily

5,949

13,804

28%

57%

78%

45%

6,599

1,827

15,472

6,886

8,361

12,487

7,351

4,174

7,325

3,077

14,987

7,703

10,526

9,505

5,374

4,175

51%

149%

90%

42%

9,805

15,456

TOTAL COMPLETIONS BY ACTIVITY TYPE

ACQUISITION

CLEARANCE / DEMO

HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE

REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION

21,992

29%

44%

10%

14,589

8,349

4,904

17%

0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%

State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

Actual

Projected

0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000

Actual

Projected

State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected

0

5000

10000

15000

20000Actual

Projected

Single FamilyMultifamily

5,949

13,804

28%

57%

78%

45%

6,599

1,827

15,472

6,886

8,361

12,487

7,351

4,174

7,325

3,077

14,987

7,703

10,526

9,505

5,374

4,175

51%

149%

90%

42%

9,805

15,456

PERCENT COMPLETE BY ACTIVITY TYPE STATE VS. LOCAL GOVERNMENT

STATE

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

ACQUISITION

CLEARANCE/ DEMO

HOME- OWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE

REHAB/NEW CONSTRUCTION

0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%

State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

Actual

Projected

0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000

Actual

Projected

State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected

0

5000

10000

15000

20000Actual

Projected

Single FamilyMultifamily

5,949

13,804

28%

57%

78%

45%

6,599

1,827

15,472

6,886

8,361

12,487

7,351

4,174

7,325

3,077

14,987

7,703

10,526

9,505

5,374

4,175

51%

149%

90%

42%

9,805

15,456

*  “Projected” refers to the total projected number of households (or properties for Clearance / Demo) the Grantee anticipates to complete by the end of their NSP grant for each Activity Type. Note: Single-Family = 1–4 units; Multifamily = 4+ units

Renovation of foreclosed multi - family property in Gallatin County, Montana

© N

SP R

esou

rce

Exch

ange

STATE VS. LOCAL COMPLETIONS ACTUAL VS. PROJECTED

PROJECTED

ACTUAL

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

ACQUISITION

CLEARANCE/ DEMO

HOME- OWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE

REHAB/NEW CONSTRUCTION

STATE

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity

with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

2

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

0% 30% 60% 90% 120% 150%

State vs Local Activity typesRehab/New Construction

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

Actual

Projected

0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000

Actual

Projected

State -- Actual vs Projected Local -- Actual vs Projected

0

5000

10000

15000

20000Actual

Projected

Single FamilyMultifamily

5,949

13,804

28%

57%

78%

45%

6,599

1,827

15,472

6,886

8,361

12,487

7,351

4,174

7,325

3,077

14,987

7,703

10,526

9,505

5,374

4,175

51%

149%

90%

42%

9,805

15,456

Adams County, CO 13 3 0 16

LH25 5 5LMMI 8 3 0 11

Akron, OH 0 218 17 235

LH25 0 22 6 28LMMI 0 196 11 207

Alameda County, CA 12 12

LH25 6 6LMMI 6 6

Alaska State Program 15 2 0 87 104

LH25 5 0 20 25LMMI 10 2 0 67 79

Allegheny County, PA 171 30 201

LH25 10 10LMMI 171 20 191

Allentown, PA 0 4 1 5

LH25 0 1 1LMMI 0 4 0 4

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

3

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

American Samoa 1 1 2

LH25 1 1LMMI 1 1

Anaheim, CA 0 17 0 17

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 17 17

Anderson, IN 0 84 22 106

LH25 0 17 17LMMI 0 84 5 89

Anoka County, MN 3 5 2 18 28

LH25 0 8 8LMMI 3 5 2 10 20

Antioch, CA 12 12

LH25 5 5LMMI 7 7

Apple Valley, CA 0 29 29

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 29 29

Arizona State Program 0 905 24 929

LH25 0 46 24 70LMMI 859 859

Arlington, TX 7 0 25 32

LH25 0 0 7 7LMMI 7 0 18 25

Atlanta, GA 4 16 2 105 127

LH25 4 66 70LMMI 0 16 2 39 57

Augusta, GA 1 0 12 13

LH25 0 0LMMI 1 0 12 13

Aurora, CO 52 0 12 64

LH25 30 12 42LMMI 22 0 0 22

Aurora, IL 7 2 9

LH25 3 3LMMI 4 2 6

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

4

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Avondale City, AZ 4 46 0 50

LH25 8 0 8LMMI 4 38 42

Babylon Township, NY 5 5

LH25 4 4LMMI 1 1

Bakersfield, CA 19 77 71 167

LH25 19 19LMMI 77 71 148

Baltimore County, MD 27 34 33 94

LH25 4 4LMMI 27 34 29 90

Baltimore, MD 65 65

LH25 42 42LMMI 23 23

Baton Rouge, LA 9 9

LH25 9 9

Bergen County, NJ 8 3 4 15

LH25 8 4 12LMMI 3 3

Birmingham, AL 0 21 21

LH25 0 7 7LMMI 0 14 14

Boston, MA 4 8 9 21

LH25 1 4 5LMMI 3 8 5 16

Boynton Beach, FL 12 12

LH25 9 9LMMI 3 3

Brevard County, FL 9 3 39 51

LH25 4 9 13LMMI 5 3 30 38

Brockton, MA 1 8 6 15

LH25 0 4 4LMMI 1 8 2 11

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

5

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Broward County, FL 0 5 22 109 136

LH25 0 48 48LMMI 0 5 22 61 88

Butler County, OH 29 6 35

LH25 3 3LMMI 29 3 32

Canton Township, MI 7 7

LH25 1 1LMMI 6 6

Canton, OH 2 14 16

LH25 4 4LMMI 2 10 12

Cape Coral, FL 0 38 35 73

LH25 8 8LMMI 0 38 27 65

Chandler, AZ 22 7 29

LH25 6 6LMMI 16 7 23

Charlotte, NC 0 20 15 35

LH25 0 15 15LMMI 0 20 20

Chattanooga, TN 10 52 4 9 75

LH25 10 10LMMI 52 4 9 65

Chicago, IL 76 55 131

LH25 22 22LMMI 76 33 109

Chula Vista, CA 19 2 21

LH25 8 8LMMI 11 2 13

Cicero, IL 0 12 3 15

LH25 0 6 0 6LMMI 6 3 9

Cincinnati, OH 187 50 237

LH25 26 26LMMI 187 24 211

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

6

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Clark County, NV 13 197 210

LH25 72 72LMMI 13 125 138

Clayton County, GA 9 137 146

LH25 1 59 60LMMI 8 78 86

Cleveland, OH 687 105 792

LH25 82 82LMMI 687 23 710

Clinton Township, MI 11 0 12 23

LH25 11 11LMMI 0 12 12

Cobb County, GA 0 48 48

LH25 0 3 3LMMI 45 45

Collier County, FL 9 1 25 35

LH25 9 5 14LMMI 1 20 21

Columbus, OH 99 107 206

LH25 89 89LMMI 99 18 117

Columbus-Muscogee, GA 0 1 1 3 5

LH25 0 1 3 4LMMI 0 1 0 0 1

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 13 13

LH25 5 5LMMI 8 8

Compton, CA 5 5

LH25 0 0LMMI 5 5

Connecticut State Program 43 1 12 7 63

LH25 26 5 31LMMI 17 1 12 2 32

Contra Costa County, CA 17 23 40

LH25 9 9LMMI 17 14 31

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

7

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Cook County, IL 38 8 46

LH25 0 0LMMI 38 8 46

Coral Springs, FL 38 38 76

LH25 10 10 20LMMI 28 28 56

Corona, CA 9 9

LH25 0 0LMMI 9 9

Cuyahoga County, OH 53 7 203 263

LH25 180 180LMMI 53 7 23 83

Dakota County, MN 0 14 41 5 60

LH25 0 4 5 9LMMI 0 14 37 51

Dallas County, TX 12 30 42

LH25 12 12LMMI 30 30

Dallas, TX 42 42 84

LH25 17 17LMMI 25 42 67

Dayton, OH 524 4 528

LH25 4 4LMMI 524 0 524

Dearborn, MI 53 3 56

LH25 2 2LMMI 53 1 54

Deerfield Beach, FL 0 7 0 7

LH25 0 3 0 3LMMI 0 4 4

Dekalb County, GA 0 10 150 160

LH25 0 94 94LMMI 0 10 56 66

Deltona, FL 46 46

LH25 14 14LMMI 32 32

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

8

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Denver, CO 40 13 53

LH25 30 30LMMI 10 13 23

Detroit, MI 0 3,080 0 0 3,080

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 3,080 0 3,080

DuPage County , IL 13 0 8 21

LH25 6 0 6LMMI 7 0 8 15

El Paso, TX 0 2 2

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 2 2

Elgin, IL 0 0 5 5

LH25 3 3LMMI 0 0 2 2

Elk Grove, CA 15 13 28

LH25 4 4LMMI 15 9 24

Elkhart, IN 0 55 1 56

LH25 0 1 1LMMI 0 55 0 55

Elyria, OH 38 7 45

LH25 6 6LMMI 38 1 39

Escambia County, FL 0 48 8 82 138

LH25 0 46 46LMMI 0 48 8 36 92

Euclid, OH 0 125 7 132

LH25 0 2 2LMMI 0 125 5 130

Evansville, IN 0 86 6 92

LH25 0 2 2LMMI 0 86 4 90

Fairfax County, VA 28 10 38

LH25 28 28LMMI 10 10

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

9

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Flint, MI 0 125 0 125

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 125 0 125

Fontana, CA 25 25

LH25 7 7LMMI 18 18

Fort Bend County, TX 0 4 18 22

LH25 2 14 16LMMI 0 2 4 6

Fort Lauderdale, FL 26 26

LH25 8 8LMMI 18 18

Fort Wayne, IN 0 1 27 28

LH25 3 3LMMI 0 1 24 25

Fort Worth, TX 0 166 166

LH25 0 13 13LMMI 153 153

Franklin County, OH 8 0 16 24

LH25 2 8 10LMMI 6 0 8 14

Fresno County, CA 68 68 136

LH25 26 26 52LMMI 42 42 84

Fresno, CA 260 77 0 337

LH25 236 236LMMI 24 77 0 101

Ft. Myers, FL 15 19 34

LH25 14 4 18LMMI 1 15 16

Fulton County, GA 0 89 89

LH25 0 26 26LMMI 0 63 63

Garland, TX 9 10 4 23

LH25 4 4LMMI 5 10 4 19

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

10

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Gary, IN 8 178 186

LH25 6 6LMMI 2 178 180

Genesee County, MI 37 150 8 0 195

LH25 19 0 19LMMI 18 150 8 176

Glendale, AZ 74 74

LH25 0 0LMMI 74 74

Grand Prairie, TX 18 61 79

LH25 4 10 14LMMI 14 51 65

Grand Rapids, MI 0 10 36 46

LH25 11 11LMMI 0 10 25 35

Greenville County, SC 4 45 21 70

LH25 3 21 24LMMI 1 45 46

Gwinnett County, GA 112 34 143 289

LH25 58 2 61 121LMMI 54 32 82 168

Hamilton City, OH 1 8 0 9 18

LH25 1 5 6LMMI 0 8 0 4 12

Hamilton County, IN 23 23

LH25 5 5LMMI 18 18

Hamilton County, OH 2 98 33 133

LH25 1 16 17LMMI 1 98 17 116

Hammond, IN 25 25

LH25 12 12LMMI 13 13

Harris County, TX 80 131 211

LH25 0 131 131LMMI 80 80

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

11

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Hawaii State Program 16 51 67

LH25 20 20LMMI 16 31 47

Hemet, CA 44 0 44

LH25 5 5LMMI 39 0 39

Henderson, NV 18 14 4 36

LH25 9 3 12LMMI 9 14 1 24

Hennepin County, MN 32 19 51

LH25 9 6 15LMMI 23 13 36

Hesperia, CA 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0

Hialeah, FL 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0

Hidalgo County, TX 5 5

LH25 1 1LMMI 4 4

Hillsborough County, FL 43 0 0 43

LH25 0 0LMMI 43 0 0 43

Hollywood, FL 25 11 11 47

LH25 25 0 25LMMI 0 11 11 22

Homestead City, FL 12 0 2 12 26

LH25 4 4 8LMMI 8 0 2 8 18

Houston, TX 13 0 0 13

LH25 10 0 10LMMI 3 0 3

Indianapolis, IN 239 134 373

LH25 73 73LMMI 239 61 300

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

12

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Islip Town, NY 9 9

LH25 3 3LMMI 6 6

Jackson, MS 0 10 10

LH25 0 7 7LMMI 0 3 3

Jacksonville-Duval, FL 0 0 58 58

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 58 58

Jefferson County, AL 0 15 15

LH25 0 6 6LMMI 0 9 9

Jersey City, NJ 6 8 47 61

LH25 28 28LMMI 6 8 19 33

Joliet, IL 3 11 17 31

LH25 5 5LMMI 3 11 12 26

Kane County, IL 1 7 8

LH25 0 3 3LMMI 1 4 5

Kansas City, MO 23 23

LH25 4 4LMMI 19 19

Kent County, MI 19 32 51

LH25 7 9 16LMMI 12 23 35

Kern County, CA 28 0 28

LH25 26 0 26LMMI 2 0 2

Kissimmee, FL 10 0 10

LH25 0 0LMMI 10 0 10

Knoxville, TN 7 6 99 112

LH25 2 42 44LMMI 5 6 57 68

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

13

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Kokomo, IN 0 0 0 13 13

LH25 0 9 9LMMI 0 0 0 4 4

Lake County, FL 0 0 28 28

LH25 0 13 13LMMI 0 0 15 15

Lake County, IL 39 39

LH25 13 13LMMI 26 26

Lake County, IN 21 22 24 67

LH25 24 24LMMI 21 22 43

Lake County, OH 0 15 15

LH25 0 0LMMI 15 15

Lakeland, FL 0 5 12 17

LH25 0 3 5 8LMMI 0 2 7 9

Lancaster, CA 19 0 19

LH25 9 0 9LMMI 10 0 10

Lansing, MI 84 18 102

LH25 8 8LMMI 84 10 94

Las Vegas, NV 29 0 102 131

LH25 29 29LMMI 0 0 102 102

Lauderhill, FL 3 24 27

LH25 1 4 5LMMI 2 20 22

Lee County, FL 69 131 200

LH25 69 1 70LMMI 0 130 130

Lincoln Park, MI 22 17 39

LH25 13 13LMMI 22 4 26

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

14

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Long Beach, CA 10 10

LH25 0 0LMMI 10 10

Lorain, OH 6 124 130

LH25 4 4LMMI 2 124 126

Los Angeles County, CA 21 100 121

LH25 21 21LMMI 100 100

Los Angeles, CA 20 40 60

LH25 3 8 11LMMI 17 32 49

Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, KY 16 16

LH25 3 3LMMI 13 13

Macomb County, MI 0 21 77 0 98

LH25 0 50 0 50LMMI 21 27 48

Manatee County, FL 0 95 1 29 125

LH25 0 1 22 23LMMI 0 95 0 7 102

Margate, FL 10 10

LH25 4 4LMMI 6 6

Maricopa County, AZ 57 10 0 67

LH25 21 0 21LMMI 36 10 46

Marion County, FL 39 0 10 49

LH25 17 0 17LMMI 22 0 10 32

McHenry County, IL 14 14

LH25 4 4LMMI 10 10

Memphis, TN 21 26 22 69

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 21 26 22 69

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

15

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Mesa, AZ 0 1 0 62 63

LH25 0 1 33 34LMMI 0 0 29 29

Mesquite, TX 7 7

LH25 4 4LMMI 3 3

Miami Gardens City, FL 0 5 0 48 53

LH25 7 7LMMI 0 5 0 41 46

Miami, FL 26 33 111 170

LH25 25 25LMMI 1 33 111 145

Miami-Dade County, FL 12 0 5 0 17

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 12 0 5 0 17

Middletown, OH 37 15 52

LH25 6 6LMMI 37 9 46

Milwaukee, WI 58 109 50 217

LH25 36 29 65LMMI 58 73 21 152

Minneapolis, MN 0 99 6 8 113

LH25 4 4LMMI 0 99 6 4 109

Miramar, FL 23 47 47 117

LH25 8 9 9 26LMMI 15 38 38 91

Modesto, CA 49 2 51

LH25 13 13LMMI 36 2 38

Montgomery County, MD 1 1

LH25 1 1

Montgomery County, OH 0 78 1 –11 68

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 78 1 –11 68

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

16

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Moreno Valley, CA 37 37

LH25 0 0LMMI 37 37

Muncie, IN 0 4 4

LH25 4 4LMMI 0 0

Nashville-Davidson, TN 52 52

LH25 44 44LMMI 8 8

Nassau County, NY 0 144 144

LH25 126 126LMMI 0 18 18

New Mexico State Program 13 129 142

LH25 5 49 54LMMI 8 80 88

New Orleans, LA 0 36 0 36

LH25 0 0LMMI 36 0 36

New York City, NY 11 0 11

LH25 11 0 11LMMI 0 0

Newark, NJ 4 79 83

LH25 0 21 21LMMI 4 58 62

North Miami, FL 15 15

LH25 5 5LMMI 10 10

Northern Mariana Islands 9 9

LH25 6 6LMMI 3 3

Oakland County, MI 81 180 158 419

LH25 92 71 163LMMI 81 88 87 256

Oakland, CA 2 0 2

LH25 0 0LMMI 2 2

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

17

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Oklahoma City, OK 0 13 13

LH25 0 6 6LMMI 0 7 7

Oklahoma State Program 0 40 0 2 42

LH25 0 1 0 2 3LMMI 0 39 0 0 39

Ontario, CA 0 14 14

LH25 0 4 4LMMI 0 10 10

Orange County, CA 7 7

LH25 1 1LMMI 6 6

Orange County, FL 12 25 148 62 247

LH25 12 14 0 26LMMI 0 25 134 62 221

Orange County, NY 0 5 5

LH25 1 1LMMI 0 4 4

Orlando, FL 2 0 40 42

LH25 0 13 13LMMI 2 0 27 29

Palm Bay, FL 42 4 16 62

LH25 14 4 16 34LMMI 28 0 28

Palm Beach County, FL 209 209

LH25 91 91LMMI 118 118

Palmdale, CA 16 0 16

LH25 10 10LMMI 6 0 6

Pasco County, FL 0 93 0 199 292

LH25 0 0 51 51LMMI 0 93 0 148 241

Paterson, NJ 2 5 7

LH25 3 3LMMI 2 2 4

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

18

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Pembroke Pines, FL 3 36 36 75

LH25 2 1 2 5LMMI 1 35 34 70

Philadelphia, PA 47 47

LH25 0 0LMMI 47 47

Phoenix, AZ 0 16 185 224 425

LH25 5 169 174LMMI 0 16 180 55 251

Pima County, AZ 0 5 15 20

LH25 11 11LMMI 0 5 4 9

Pinellas County, FL 0 0 0 71 71

LH25 0 36 36LMMI 0 0 0 35 35

Pittsburgh, PA 154 73 227

LH25 46 46LMMI 154 27 181

Plantation, FL 8 6 14

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 8 6 14

Polk County, Fl 0 163 163

LH25 30 30LMMI 0 133 133

Pomona, CA 13 0 0 13

LH25 6 6LMMI 7 0 0 7

Pompano Beach, FL 20 3 1 24

LH25 10 10LMMI 10 3 1 14

Pontiac, MI 9 89 1 12 111

LH25 3 12 15LMMI 6 89 1 96

Port St. Lucie, FL 0 30 0 97 127

LH25 0 13 0 42 55LMMI 0 17 0 55 72

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

19

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Prince Georges County, MD 1,117 26 1,143

LH25 142 4 146LMMI 975 22 997

Prince William County, VA 3 22 25

LH25 3 1 4LMMI 21 21

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 9

LH25 3 3LMMI 6 6

Redford, MI 25 0 37 62

LH25 0 13 13LMMI 25 0 24 49

Rhode Island State Program 2 2 136 225 365

LH25 100 100LMMI 2 2 136 125 265

Rialto, CA 3 58 61

LH25 0 0LMMI 3 58 61

Richland County, SC 37 12 49

LH25 9 9LMMI 37 3 40

Richmond, CA 0 14 14

LH25 0 6 6LMMI 0 8 8

Riverside County, CA 65 63 204 332

LH25 65 2 58 125LMMI 0 61 146 207

Riverside, CA 62 9 71

LH25 35 35LMMI 27 9 36

Rockford, IL 1 26 0 1 28

LH25 0 1 1LMMI 1 26 0 0 27

Sacramento County, CA 0 1 166 167

LH25 55 55LMMI 0 1 111 112

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

20

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Sacramento, CA 0 0 110 110

LH25 37 37LMMI 0 0 73 73

San Antonio, TX 105 18 214 337

LH25 86 0 86LMMI 19 18 214 251

San Bernardino County, CA 18 278 296

LH25 7 160 167LMMI 11 118 129

San Bernardino, CA 54 11 65

LH25 9 9LMMI 45 11 56

San Diego County, CA 13 3 1 17

LH25 13 1 14LMMI 3 3

San Diego, CA 38 51 4 93

LH25 30 4 34LMMI 8 51 59

San Joaquin County, CA 79 0 42 121

LH25 42 42LMMI 79 0 79

San Jose, CA 5 5

LH25 5 5

Santa Ana, CA 50 4 54

LH25 14 14LMMI 36 4 40

Sarasota County, FL 58 58

LH25 26 26LMMI 32 32

Savannah, GA 2 6 8

LH25 2 1 3LMMI 0 5 5

Seminole County, FL 1 58 59

LH25 0 35 35LMMI 1 23 24

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

21

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Shelby County, TN 25 34 59

LH25 6 11 17LMMI 19 23 42

South Bend, IN 69 25 94

LH25 17 17LMMI 69 8 77

South Carolina State Program 201 295 77 573

LH25 119 70 189LMMI 82 295 7 384

Southfield, MI 6 65 51 122

LH25 22 22LMMI 6 65 29 100

Springfield, MA 0 16 16

LH25 10 10LMMI 0 6 6

Springfield, OH 0 30 22 52

LH25 0 0 12 12LMMI 0 30 10 40

St Paul, MN 29 29

LH25 22 22LMMI 7 7

St Petersburg, FL 0 0 20 20

LH25 0 20 20LMMI 0 0 0 0

St. Clair County, IL 41 41

LH25 17 17LMMI 24 24

St. Louis County, MO 0 33 33

LH25 0 18 18LMMI 0 15 15

St. Louis, MO 0 3 3

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 3 3

Stanislaus County, CA 68 3 68 139

LH25 24 24 48LMMI 44 3 44 91

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

22

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Stark County, OH 32 17 42 2 93

LH25 13 13LMMI 19 17 42 2 80

State of Alabama 0 156 156

LH25 75 75LMMI 0 81 81

State of Arkansas 178 178

LH25 176 176LMMI 2 2

State of California 0 90 194 510 794

LH25 0 174 174LMMI 90 194 336 620

State of Colorado 0 0 26 26

LH25 0 26 26LMMI 0 0 0 0

State of Delaware 3 28 50 81

LH25 7 14 21LMMI 3 21 36 60

State of Florida 112 13 90 595 810

LH25 54 1 206 261LMMI 58 12 90 389 549

State of Georgia 14 0 554 327 895

LH25 0 0 74 131 205LMMI 14 0 480 196 690

State of Idaho 201 53 254

LH25 57 5 62LMMI 144 48 192

State of Illinois 0 1 74 75

LH25 47 47LMMI 0 1 27 28

State of Indiana – IHCDA 118 478 489 1,085

LH25 219 219LMMI 118 478 270 866

State of Iowa 73 142 130 345

LH25 48 28 51 127LMMI 25 114 79 218

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

23

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

State of Kansas 3 2 24 129 158

LH25 2 4 54 60LMMI 1 2 20 75 98

State of Kentucky 26 28 13 165 232

LH25 7 13 69 89LMMI 26 21 96 143

State of Louisiana 0 0 167 192 359

LH25 0 0 122 122LMMI 0 0 167 70 237

State of Maine 0 6 26 32

LH25 0 11 11LMMI 0 6 15 21

State of Maryland 5 1 236 47 289

LH25 2 30 31 63LMMI 3 1 206 16 226

State of Massachusetts 24 32 188 244

LH25 7 100 107LMMI 17 32 88 137

State of Michigan 0 746 21 121 888

LH25 3 6 9LMMI 0 746 18 115 879

State of Minnesota 121 179 300

LH25 31 71 102LMMI 90 108 198

State of Mississippi 546 119 665

LH25 92 119 211LMMI 454 454

State of Missouri 4 6 295 0 305

LH25 0 3 0 3LMMI 4 3 295 0 302

State of Montana 0 3 120 123

LH25 0 3 69 72LMMI 0 51 51

State of Nebraska 10 89 99

LH25 9 9LMMI 10 80 90

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

24

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

State of Nevada 126 113 239

LH25 78 78LMMI 126 35 161

State of New Hampshire 0 19 28 47

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 19 28 47

State of New Jersey 2 1 76 79

LH25 2 1 51 54LMMI 0 0 25 25

State of New York 165 325 490

LH25 220 220LMMI 165 105 270

State of North Carolina 30 6 408 285 729

LH25 19 0 206 242 467LMMI 11 6 202 43 262

State of North Dakota – DOC 1 1 199 201

LH25 63 63LMMI 1 1 136 138

State of Ohio 0 10,379 135 10,514

LH25 18 18LMMI 0 10,379 117 10,496

State of Oregon 169 55 224

LH25 18 35 53LMMI 151 20 171

State of Pennsylvania 7 442 449

LH25 305 305LMMI 7 137 144

State of South Dakota 12 3 1 99 115

LH25 3 0 0 43 46LMMI 9 3 1 56 69

State of Tennessee 130 146 4 3 283

LH25 27 3 30LMMI 103 146 4 0 253

State of Texas – TDHCA 45 163 20 29 257

LH25 33 7 14 54LMMI 12 163 13 15 203

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

25

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

State of Utah 163 0 0 163

LH25 102 102LMMI 61 0 0 61

State of Vermont 22 0 175 197

LH25 15 87 102LMMI 7 0 88 95

State of Virginia 0 0 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0 0

State of Washington 93 3 43 139

LH25 55 0 55LMMI 38 3 43 84

State of West Virginia 123 123

LH25 65 65LMMI 58 58

State of Wisconsin 2 57 59 274 392

LH25 0 18 159 177LMMI 2 57 41 115 215

Sterling Heights, MI 0 25 12 37

LH25 12 12LMMI 0 25 25

Stockton, CA 2 7 61 70

LH25 0 0LMMI 2 7 61 70

Suffolk County, NY 20 20

LH25 6 6LMMI 14 14

Summit County, OH 0 65 65

LH25 0 48 48LMMI 0 17 17

Sunrise, FL 1 0 10 11

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 1 0 10 11

Surprise Town, AZ 26 0 26

LH25 10 0 10LMMI 16 0 16

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

26

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Tamarac, FL 1 53 53 107

LH25 16 16 32LMMI 1 37 37 75

Tampa, FL 0 107 107

LH25 0 81 81LMMI 0 26 26

Tarrant County, TX 14 10 24

LH25 10 10LMMI 14 14

Taylor, MI 21 21

LH25 5 5LMMI 16 16

Territory of Guam 3 3

LH25 3 3

Toledo, OH 112 51 163

LH25 17 17LMMI 112 34 146

Tucson, AZ 8 8

LMMI 8 8

Union County, NJ 0 0 0

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0

Vallejo, CA 3 6 9

LH25 0 0LMMI 3 6 9

Victorville, CA 66 2 17 0 85

LH25 57 2 59LMMI 9 17 0 26

Virgin Islands 0 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0

Visalia, CA 26 26

LH25 4 4LMMI 22 22

Volusia County, FL 11 36 47

LH25 11 17 28LMMI 19 19

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP1 Summary Report

27

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP1 PRODUCTION REPORTS

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

Warren, MI 37 1 21 59

LH25 9 9LMMI 37 1 12 50

Washington, DC 23 23

LH25 8 8LMMI 15 15

Washtenaw County, MI 28 212 67 307

LH25 63 63LMMI 28 212 4 244

Waterford Township, MI 1 124 125

LH25 23 23LMMI 1 101 102

Wayne County, MI 952 0 38 990

LH25 0 38 38LMMI 952 952

West Palm Beach, FL 6 4 4 14

LH25 1 1LMMI 5 4 4 13

Westland, MI 0 3 24 4 31

LH25 4 4LMMI 0 3 24 0 27

Will County, IL 1 58 111 170

LH25 27 27LMMI 1 58 84 143

Worcester, MA 16 48 64

LH25 28 28LMMI 16 20 36

Wyoming State Program 42 0 42

LH25 10 0 10LMMI 32 32

York County, PA 0 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0

Youngstown, OH 11 256 267

LH25 6 6LMMI 5 256 261

Grand Total 4,904 21,992 8,349 14,589 49,834