nrt plan reconciliation analysis department of homeland security and the nrt / rrts cdr ray perry
TRANSCRIPT
NRT Plan Reconciliation Analysis
Department of Homeland Security
And the NRT / RRTs
CDR Ray Perry
2
Project Purpose
Conduct an analysis of the Federal emergency response plans to identify
conflicts and gaps in coverage, as well as a review of authorities for each plan.
&
Provide recommendations to address identified conflicts & gaps.
3
NRT Plan Reconciliation AnalysisBackground
Four plans considered in the analysis: FRP, NCP, FRERP, & CONPLAN.
May 23, 02 – Analysis was adopted by NRT as a Project. (1st meeting Sept 2002)
November 05, 02 - Interim Brief # 1 to OHS.
January, 06 - Interim Brief # 2 to OHS.
4
Recommendations
(12 of 22)
5
Develop a “One Plan” document that clearly lays out the relationships, reconciles the differences, covers the gaps, and bridges, but does not reinvent the FRP, NCP, FRERP and the CONPLAN. The FRP should be the basis for this plan and amended to clearly allow implementation without a presidential declaration.
The existing plans and the “One Plan” (assuming it uses existing plans as its base), should clarify which Federal agency has the lead in different types of emergencies and when multiple plans apply.
6
The role & responsibilities of the “LFA” & supporting agencies at national, regional and on-scene levels needs to be decided as a policy matter and clarified in the “one plan” or plans.
As much as possible, standardize the methodology and terminology for federal government response management organizations and resources to ensure a smoother integration of plans when more than a single plan applies during an incident.
7
NIIMS based ICS/UC should be adopted nationally by federal government as the “on scene” management system.
A bridging document that seeks to reconcile the various federal plans needs to rise above the level of a plan itself. Since plans are a subset of preparedness, the document should focus on preparedness as a strategy and the plans as key factors of that strategy. Use the preparedness model in the next slide to incorporate all elements of preparedness in the “One Plan” and all the subordinate plans.
8
Preparedness Model
Non-GovernmentCapabilities
Non-GovernmentCapabilities
EvaluationsEvaluations
Plans & Policy
Plans & Policy
GovernmentCapabilitiesGovernmentCapabilities
Team- Training,Exercises & Actual
events
Team- Training,Exercises & Actual
events
Stakeholder Outreach & Engagement
Outcome : Successful Response
9
Planning must include a structure to implement the preparedness model depicted in No. 9 at the national, regional and local levels. The structure should be supported by funding, & mandated participation by the response organizations. (Note: The NCP, with its NRT, RRTs & APCs/LEPCs comes closest to this structure. FRERP has a similar structure, but applies only to areas having Nuclear Power Plant
OSHA should provide assistance to the “LFA” by being the primary support agency for technical expertise & risk management of worker safety & health. Responder & recovery worker safety & health should be explicitly addressed in the federal response plan(s).
10
Private sector responsibilities and role in preparedness & response needs to be included in the federal plans.
Coordination with DOD needs to continue in order to identify conditions under which DOD might be in the lead, develop a process for requesting DOD assets as needed, & establish a communications process so local and DOD communication can take place effectively.
11
Enhanced interagency biological response planning is needed. One approach would be to strengthen ESF #8 – Health & Medical Services, ESF # 10 – Hazardous Materials, & ESF # 11 – Food Groups of the FRP. The planning should ensure that appropriate roles and responsibilities are defined for both biological agents with an environmental component & those without.
Develop legislation or policy to address shortfalls and coordination of funding (Stafford Act, Price-Anderson Act, CERCLA, Oil Pollution Fund).
END
12
NRT Plan Recon. Analysis Score CardRecommendation HS PD-5 NRP Leg. Auth.
1. Develop plan that reconciles & bridges, but does not replace
(16)April 1, 03
2. Clarify Federal Lead
3. Clarify Roles & Responsibilities of LFA +
(4) (8) (9) (10) (11)
4. Announce LFA
5. Process to Transfer the Lead
6. Procedures at Fed.Bldings
7. Standard Methodology & Terminology
(15)
8. NIIMS based ICS/UC (15)(16a)(18)(19b)
9. Preparedness Model (12) (16d)
10. Structure to Implement Preparedness
Sept. 1, 03
11. OSHA Assistance to LFA
12. Security (Prsn/Info/OPSEC) Sept. 1, 03
13
NRT Plan Recon. Analysis Score Card
Recommendation HS PD-5 NRP Leg. Auth.13. Private Sector Resp. & Role (7) April, 1, 03
14. Coordination with DOD (9)
15. Enhance Biological Resp.
16. Include Special Teams Info.
17. Address Coordination & Shortfalls in Funding
Sept. 1, 03
18. Support/Fund Preparedness (#9)
Sept. 1, 03
19. Develop Publ. Info/Risk Comms Protocols
20. Multiple Incident Resource Mngt. Mechanism-Cons. SONS
21. Data Management Sys
22. Address Long Term Recovery & Remediation
14
This Next Presentation Provides an Overview of DHS.
Much of the Information is Predecisional and should NOT be
Considered Endorsed by the DHS or the CG
Provides a Point of Reference forNRT / RRTs to move forward
15
Keep In Mind:
The NRS is the most Comprehensive & Best in place today, but can be improved;
Unity of Purpose;
Window Of Opportunity; and
In this time of Change, if it is not broken?
Protect It.
16
SecretaryDepartment of Homeland Security
Thomas J. Ridge
SecretaryDepartment of Homeland Security
Thomas J. Ridge
Deputy Secretary of Homeland SecurityGordon R. England
Deputy Secretary of Homeland SecurityGordon R. England
S&TDr.Charles McQuery
S&TDr.Charles McQuery
IAIPJohn C. Gannon?
IAIPJohn C. Gannon?
B&TSAsa Hutchinson
B&TSAsa Hutchinson
ManagementJanet Hale
ManagementJanet Hale
EP&RMichael D. Brown
EP&RMichael D. Brown
Department of Homeland Security
Coast GuardCoast GuardSecret ServiceSecret Service
17
Know Now
President Wants One “Coordinator” for Emergency Response.
DHS Will Coordinate Preparedness & Responses to All Hazards: Intentional; Accidental; and Natural.
Announcement on Field Structure Should be made in the Near Future.
18
Regional Integration Concept
OneDepartment
Pre-DHS
IntegratedOperations
• Strong Regions*• Enhanced Security• Unity of Purpose
• Clear Chains of Authority • New Capabilities Created• Duplicative Efforts Eliminated
Independent AgenciesIn Various Departments
Functional AlignmentIntegrated At Region
19
Proposed DHS Regional StructureProposed DHS Regional Structure
II
IIIIII
IIII
IVIV
VIIIVIII
VIIVII
VIVI
VV
CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, RI, VT
IA, KS, MO, NE, CO, SD, UT, WY
IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN, PR, VI
DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
AZ, CA, HI, NV
AK, ID, OR, WA, MT, ND
20
SecretaryDeputy Secretary
Coast GuardComponent
The Other FiveRegions
Mid AtlanticRegion
SoutheastRegion
RegionOpsCen
Coast GuardCommandant
Port/District/SectorCG COTP
Port/District/SectorBCBP Director
Port/District/SectorBICE SAIC
Port/District/SectorFSD (airport)
HQ CommandCenter
VerticalAlignment
Great LakesRegion
Port/District/Sector
Coordination CenterPort/District/Sector
Coordination CenterPort/District/Sector
Coordination CenterPort/District/Sector
Coordination Center
21
RegionalStaff
DHS RegionalDirector
Coast GuardComponent Commander
TSAComponent Commander
CustomsComponent Commander
Bureau ofBorder SecurityComponent Cdr.
Port / District
IntelligenceOperationalPlanning
OperationsCenter
Operational &Contingency
Plans & Exercises
Public AffairsExternal Liaison
Northcom & FBI
E.A. & LegalStaff
Routine OperationsNon-Routine HLS Operations
22
Plays major support role in maritime security
BCBPBureau of Customs and Border
Inspections
BICEBureau of Inspections
and Customs Enforcement
Port Director
No Single BICE POC
FPS
Customs Investigations/Foreign
Ops Air Marine
Div Intelligence
INS Intelligence Investigations Detention & Removal
TSA
Federal Security Director (FSD)
Border Patrol Sector Chief
COTP/FOSC: The Way Ahead Under DHS
Our New DHS Partners in the Port : The Border & Transportation Security Directorate
Prevent Terrorist/WMD Entry
Facilitate Flow of Legitimate commerce
Customs Inspections
INS Inspections
APHIS
23
COTP/FOSC Alignment with DHS Partners: How it all adds up:
Consistent Relationships +
Shared Data +
Shared Intelligence +
Common Operating Picture +
Standard Operating Procedures+
Unity of Effort =________________________
Enhanced Port Security
COTP/FOSC: The Way Ahead Under DHS
24
Notional Transition Steps for Regions
02/01 02/08 02/15 02/22 03/01 04//07 05/05 06/02 Jul Sep Dec Mar 04 Jul 04
Ports, Districts& Sectors
Regions
DHS OpCenDirectorates
BTS AlignmentBTS
Ports, Districts & Sectors Stand-up
DHS Procurement
DHS Personnel Mgmt.
Baseline Coordination RD, Intel, CIP & Plans
OpCens for Responses
Ops/Resp & Resource/Rqmnts
OpCens for all Ops/Responses
Regions Fully Operational
The End
Any Answers?