notice of public meeting board of directors clark...

FILE COPY EFE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

SEPTEMBER 10, 1992

8:30 A.M.

CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS

225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 891 55

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:

VIRGINIA BAX-VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER

301 EAST CLARK AVENUE, SUITE 301

LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89101

455-31 39

POSTED: SEPTEMBER 4, 1992

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS 2200 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV 89030

CLARK COUNTY BRIDGER BUILDING 225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV 89155

CITY OF U S VEGAS CITY HALL 400 EAST STEWART U S VEGAS, NV 89101

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 301 EAST CLARK, SUITE 301 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 I

' 1 T . 7 f .- T--

AGENDA

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS SEPTEMBER 10, 1992

1. CALL TO ORDER AND MINUTES

2) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1992

II. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

3) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR ' CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL

/

4)- VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION BY CLARK COUNTY FOR THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - DETENTION BASIN SITE "C"

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF

DETENTION BASIN SITE "C" THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS -

5) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN 1 THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF THE CHEYENNE

CHANNEL - BUFFALO DRIVE TO THE GOWAN SOUTH DETENTION BASIN

6) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN / THE SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE

HEMENWAY VALLEY WASH IMPROVEMENTS

7 ) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOWAN DETENTION SYSTEM

RFCD Board Agenda Page 2 September 10, 1992

8 ) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE LAS VEGAS WASH

9) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST BY CLARK COUNTY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE UNIFORM REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL

LAUGHLIN, NEVADA OF DRAINAGE - ELEVATION REQUIREMENT AT 3699 CATALINA,

111. ADMINISTRATION

10) REVlEW/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL - 1992

11) RECEIVE A REPORT REGARDING PROJECTS ON WHICH AESTHETIC ENHANCEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED AND DIRECT STAFF AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE

12) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO DIRECT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TO REPRESENT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THE KERN RIVER GAS PIPELINE

13) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

14) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORTS

15) CITIZENS PARTICIPATION No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Board can direct that it be placed on a future agenda

MINUTES CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUGUST 13, 1992

MEETING NOTICES: Public Notices of the meeting were posted August 7, 1992, by Jon Downer of the Regional Flood Control District in the following locations: Las Vegas City Hall, North Las Vegas City Hall, Clark County Bridger Building, and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District offices.

Public Notices of the meeting were also mailed on August 6, 1992 to the cities of Boulder City, Henderson, Laughlin, and Mesquite for posting on community notice boards.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael R. Harris, Chairman, City of Henderson Thalia Dondero, Vice-chairman, Clark County Iris Bletsch, City of Boulder City Bruce Woodbury, Clark County Jan Laverty Jones, City of Las Vegas Tom R. Leavitt, City of Mesquite Theron Goynes, City of North Las Vegas

MEMBERS EXCUSED: Scott Higginson, City of Las Vegas

STAFF: Virginia Valentine, General Manager Gale Wm. Fraser II, Assistant General Manager Deanna Lefko, Management Analyst I Chris Figgins, Deputy District Attorney Timothy E. Sutko, Senior Hydrologist Dennis Johnson, Manager, Business & Finance Catherine Razor, Project Administration Coordinator Chrisell Anderson-Jones, Word Processor

INTERESTED PARTIES: Martin Manning, Clark County Public Works Mark Teepan, City of Las Vegas Public Works Ken Gilbreth, VTN Nevada

Board Minutes August 13, 1992 Page 2

1. CALL TO ORDER AND MINUTES

The meeting was called to order at 8:34 a.m.

Commissioner Dondero moved to approve the agenda. There being' no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

2) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF JULY 9. 1992

Commissioner Dondero moved to approve the minutes. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


111. PLANNING

3) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A CONTRACT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PREPARATION QF THE MOAPA VALLEY MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Ms. Valentine stated that staff negotiated a professional services contract in the amount of $1 20,000 with James M. Montgomery Engineers, Inc. to prepare a routine Master Plan update for the Moapa Valley. The contract was reviewed by the District Attorney's office and staff recommended approval.

Councilman Goynes moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


At the request of the District Attorney, this item was ratified later in the meeting with Commissioner Woodbury and Mayor Jones being present,

Chairman Harris moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.



4) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTt 4ORIZE THF CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE FOR PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES JDENTlFlED FOR GOODSPRINGS AND SFARCHI ,IGHT. NEVADA

Ms. Valentine explained that staff had negotiated an amendment to the original contract to provide Environmental Assessments that would not require additional funding. The cost for these services is 575,897; however, they will be provided without increasing approved funding under the existing contract. The District Attorney has reviewed the amendment and staff recommended approval.



5) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST BY CLARK COUNTY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE UNIFORM REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF DRAINAGE FOR 3699 CATALINA, LAUGHLIN. NEVADA

Chairman Harris said that he understood this item is to be continued to the next regular meeting. Ms. Valentine stated that staff requests the item be held pending receipt of additional information from Clark County Public Works on the specifics of the variance requested.

Commissioner Dondero moved that this item be held for consideration at the next regular meeting. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


111. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Ms. Valentine said that without a two-thirds vote (six members), the Board would not be able to take action to approve interlocal contracts. She suggested that consideration of items #6 through #8C be postponed until the expected arrival of another Board Member.


6) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHOqllE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOWAN PETENTION SYSTFM

(Item held for consideration later in the meeting.)

7 ) BUFFALO CHANNEL - SUMMERLIN PARKWAY TO VEGAS DRIVE

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS ON THE BUFFALO CHANNEL - SUMMERLIN PARKWAY TO VEGAS DRIVE

(Presentation held for later in the meeting.)

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO-SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUFFALO CHANNEL - SUMMERLIN PARKWAY TO VEGAS DRIVE


8 ) MEADOWS - ALTA STORM DRAIN

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS ON THE MEADOWS - ALTA STORM DRAIN (MEADOWS - PHASE V STORM DRAIN)

(Presentation held for later in the meeting.)

B) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS TO RE-PRIORITIZE PROJECTS ON THE DISTRICT’S 10-YEAR PLAN AND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECT LIST


C) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOWS - ALTA STORM DRAIN (MEADOWS - PHASE V STORM DRAIN)



9) ACTION TO APPROVF A RFQUEST FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS TO RE- PRIORITIZE PROJECTS ON THE DISTRICT'S 1 O-YEAR PLAN AND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECT LIST (FREEWAY CHANNEL - SAHARA AVENUE TO IVANHOE WAY)

Ms. Valentine stated that a significant savings will be realized if the portion of the channel which lies under Sahara Avenue is constructed before the Interchange is built. Staff recommended approval of the re-prioritization of this project.

Councilman Bletsch moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


10) LOGAN WASH CHANNEL

A) ADOPTION OF CLARK COUNTY'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT FOR THE LOGAN WASH CHANNEL Generally located in the S 1 /2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 27, Township 15S, Range 67E. Proposed settlement is dedicated right-of-way exchange for modifying the plans for the project. Parcel No. 690-800-001. Owner: Carson Wayne Newton

Ms. Valentine stated that as a part of the settlement negotiated for the right-of-way acquisition, a construction change was made to the project. Staff recommends approval of the negotiated settlement and the change order to facilitate the settlement.


VOTE: . 5 AYES - 0 NAYS

B) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE LOGAN WASH CHANNEL




Councilman Bletsch asked if the Special Technical Advisory Committee had met and discussed this item. Ms. Valentine said that the Special Technical Advisory Committee had met and recommended approval of both items A & B. She modified staff's recommendation for approval to be subject to approval of the interlocal contract (item 1 OC). Chairman Harris acknowledged staff's modified recommendation.

. 'e

C) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LOGAN WASH CHANNEL, MOAPA VALLEY

(This item was held for consideration later in the meeting.)

11) VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A RECOMMENDATION FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR AWARD OF BID FOR THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE 111 PROJECT

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends acceptance of the County's recommendation for Award of Bid to Professional Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $778,060.

Commissioner Dondero motioned for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


(Commissioner Woodbury arrived 8:40 a.m.).

It is hereby noted that with Commissioner Woodbury's arrival, the required f Board members were present to authorize approval of interlocal

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS

Chairman Harris motioned for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.



6) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOWAN DETENTION SYSTEM

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends approval of the City of Las Vegas' request for a first supplement interlocal contract which reduces the funding due to favorable bids. The return of $3.4 million to the Bond Fund (444) will be available for reappropriation.



7 ) BUFFALO CHANNEL - SUMMERLIN PARKWAY TO VEGAS DRIVE

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS ON THE BUFFALO CHANNEL - SUMMERLIN PARKWAY TO VEGAS DRIVE

Ken Gilbreth, VTN Nevada (engineering consultant for this project), gave the presentation. Commissioner Dondero stated, for clarification, that only the box culvert over the Washington area is going to be open channel through Vegas Drive. Mr. Gilbreth concurred.

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUFFALO CHANNEL - SUMMERLIN PARKWAY TO VEGAS DRIVE

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends approval.

Commissioner Woodbury moved to accept the presentation and approve the interlocal contract. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.



8) MEADOWS - ALTA STORM DRAIN t

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS ON THE MEADOWS - ALTA STORM DRAIN (MEADOWS - PHASE V STORM DRAIN)

Mark Teepan from the City of Las Vegas gave the presentation. Councilman Bletsch asked if this phase had not yet been constructed due to a lack of funding. Mr. Teepan explained that Part A and Part B, depicted in the exhibit as being the upper and lower ends, were constructed before funding ran out, and the contractor can piggyback construction of Part C, giving the appearance of a continuation of the same project.

B) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS TO RE-PRIORITIZE PROJECTS ON THE DISTRICT'S 10-YEAR PLAN AND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECT LIST

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends approval of the re-prioritization of the project. This action will reduce project costs and eliminate costs associated with ripping up the street, if constructed at a later date.

Councilman Bletsch moved to accept the presentation and approve re-prioritization. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 6 AYES- 0 NAYS

C) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOWS - ALTA STORM DRAIN (MEADOWS - PHASE V STORM DRAIN)

Chairman Harris moved for approval. There being to further discussion, the motion carried.


(Mayor Jones arrived at 8:47 a.m.)

Ms. Valentine advised the Board that the District Attorney requested a ion of items #3 and #4 since seven members of the Board were now


10) LOGAN WASH CHANNEL

C) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LOGAN WASH CHANNEL, MOAPA VALLEY

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends approval.



12) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CHANNEL

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends approval of the first supplemental interlocal contract to fund additional work on the Union Pacific Railroad Channel. This action does not increase funding approved in the original interlocal contract.



13) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE LAS VEGAS WASH BETWEEN CRAIG ROAD.AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE

Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommended approval of the request to fund additional expenses incurred during construction, to facilitate final payments, and to close out the project.




14) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF BOULDER CITY FOR

[MPROVEMENTS y N R N .

Ms. Valentine stated staff recommends approval of the change -order. The net increase to the construction contract is 8149,970.37 and includes adjustments for utility conflicts and rock excavation.



15) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUFST FROM THE CITY OF LAS V m S FOR CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. 1 ON THF WASHINGTON AVENUE C0NVEYANC;r SYSTEM - SANDHILL ROAD OUTFALL STRUCTURE

Ms. Valentine said the contract modification will decrease the interlocal in the amount of $30,976 and staff recommends approval.



IV. ADMINISTRATION

16) J3lSCUSSlON AND POSSIBLF ACTION TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO SUBMIT A BILL DRAFT REQUFST

Ms. Valentine said that at the request of the Board at the July -9 meeting, staff prepared a Bill Draft Request. She explained that if submitted and passed, this legislation will allow an entity to proceed with a project after approval by the District and the entity in which any or all of the project is located. The District Attorney's office has reviewed the language.




17) ACTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 34.030 (c) OF THE UNIFORM EGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF DRAINAGE,

Ms. Valentine stated the Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage include a passage that requires finished grade contours on grading plans. Local consultants were opposed to this requirement. The consultants contended that the information could be conveyed correctly without the additional cost of adding finished contours.

Ms. Valentine further explained that the proposed amendment would provide consultants with the option of utilizing sufficient spot elevations or finished grade contours on grading plans. The amendment was reviewed by the District Attorney’s office, and staff recommended approval.



18) plSCUSSlON AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 6.1 (f) OF THE DISTRICT’S POI ,lClES AND PROCEDURES

Ms. Valentine said that at the direction of the Board, staff had drafted an amendment to the Policies and Procedures Manual which would clarify the manner in which requests for landscaping and aesthetic enhancements are made. Specifically, that at the time an entity requested funding for landscaping or aesthetic enhancement, specific plans, cost estimates, and scope of work would be detailed in the interlocal contract.

Chairman Harris said that while he personally does not support the idea, the Board needs more information concerning the specifics surrounding the funds being requested for landscaping and aesthetic enhancements.

Commissioner Dondero suggested that the District and the entity building the project contribute equally in funding aesthetic enhancements. By incorporating a’”matching funds” policy, all entities would be able to receive District funds for projects requiring landscaping and aesthetic enhancements.

Councilman Bletsch reiterated the issues involved with approving landscaping and aesthetic enhancements as part of a flood control project, and the importance of minimizing this type of funding altogether.

.. .* - - r -


.~ ‘k

Ms. Valentine explained the purpose of this policy is to provide the Board with detailed information at the time a request for funding is presented, enabling the Board to make that decision at the onset of a project.

Councilman Leavitt inquired if staff had analyzed upcoming projects to determine which may fit this criteria. Ms. Valentine said that an analysis had not been made, but that staff would provide the Board with a report on the review of aesthetic enhancement costs associated with upcoming projects. ‘With that information, an item would be presented to discuss Commissioner Dondero‘s suggestion of “matching funds.”

Chairman Harris said that the proposed language change will provide the Board with better information concerning what is specifically being requested. Meanwhile, he requested a more in-depth look into the issue of funding landscaping and aesthetic enhancements.

Councilman Bletsch moved for approval of the proposed language for landscaping and aesthetic enhancement of projects, and requested an investigation of and a report on the methodology of funding these expenses, There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


19) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FOURTH QUARTER STATUS REPORTS FOR FY 1991 /92 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAMS IN CLARK COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF BOULDER CITY, HENDERSON, LAS VEGAS, MESQUITE, AND NORTH LAS VEGAS

Ms. Valentine stated these are the final Quarter reports for FY 91/92. Staff is in the process sf closing out those maintenance work plans which had not been committed, and carrying them over to FY 1992/93 plans. Chairman Harris requested that all entities complete their close outs and move into the current FY 1992/93 budget.




20) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

Ms. Valentine stated there are 28 projects complete to date, 10 currently under construction, and about 23 in design or awaiting start of construction. She cited the significant milestones reached during the month of July in project completions and starts. Ms. Catherine Razor gave a brief overview of the status of the projects.

Chairman Harris moved to accept the Project Status Reports. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


Ms. Valentine stated that the project delay reports indicated those projects which were experiencing delays since the previous quarter. She noted that the delays were primarily due to circumstances outside of the District's control, such as weather and right-of-way negotiations. Ms. Valentine said that since the tabulation of the report, two projects had already been completed, Pittman Wash Channel Phase 2 and Town Wash Detention Basin.

Chairman Harris requested that the Board be made aware of any projects which may be experiencing insurmountable problems causing delays. He said there may be a need to re-prioritize such projects and return approved funding for reallocation in the interim.

Commissioner Dondero inquired about the Winnick Avenue delay, noted due to coordination with Imperial Palace. Martin Manning, Clark County Public Works Director, explained that because of the owners' concerns with disturbance under the hotel, hydraulic modeling had been requested. He said there is a need to safely capture and convey a large quantity of flowing water to the Flamingo Wash. At this time, they were at a 90 percent level of design completion.

Chairman Harris asked if the District had an alert system in place which would allow the Imperial Palace enough time to move parked vehicles in the event of a storm. Ms. Valentine assured the Board that the District works very closely with the management of the Imperial Palace. In addition to placing a number of rain gauges in the area and constant communications during an event, the District may give them direct access to the flood warning system.


Commissioner Dondero inquired about the intake capabilities of the design and Councilman Bletsch noted concern about washed-away vehicles. Mr. Manning explained that the project is being designed to handle the forceful stormwaters experienced in that area, and to keep the water and debris contained and off the street.

Chairman Harris noted there was no action on this item, it was informational only.

22) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FlNANClAl REPORTS

Ms. Valentine said the usual monthly Financial Reports were in order for approval. Chairman Harris asked for an explanation concerning Clark County's withdrawal of approximately $616,678 District Funds. Ms. Valentine explained that in monthly payments by the County for interest earned, it appeared an overpayment accrued in Fund 286. To correct the undetected windfall, the County deducted the overpayment from Fund 286. She added that the current fund balances were such so as not to affect any of the actions taken by the Board at this meeting, and that next month's financials would reflect the fund's change.

Commissioner Dondero moved for acceptance. There being. no further discussion, the motion carried.


23) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND THE PROJECT CLOSE OUTS

Ms. Valentine said that 6 project close outs will return 8228,876,87 to Fund 286 for future allocations on new projects.

Chairman Harris moved for acceptance of the report and close outs. .There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


24) N

There was none.


ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, Chairman Harris adjourned the meeting at 9:12 a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

VIffiUhIA VALENTINE, P.E. GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER

Attest: 1992

MICHAEL R. HARRIS CHAIRMAN

r~ T


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 2

~~~~ ~

(CLA.03.B.90)

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICAL C 0 M " E E : Approve.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 9110192

CLARK COUNTY

REGIONAL FU)OD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA I” ._ ‘k

SuBJErn.

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL

I PETITIONER M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER

THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 2 TO THE CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL, BID NO. 2554-91.

FISCAL IMPACX Current interlocal contract funding is sufficient to cover change order number 2 in the amount of $85,209.21.

BACKGROUND:

This Change Order represents an adjustment of bid quantities to reflect actual quantities used in the amount of $62,200.81. Also included is a change in scope of work required at a junction structure for an increase of $24,438.40, and a credit of $1,130.00 for’a reduction in the size of manholes.

The work and associated cost have been reviewed by the Consultant and Public Works staff and are felt to be equitable.

TM: AGE- RFCD AGE- I”&M# 6A

D8te: 9/10/92 D8ta 0 8 / 2 7 / 9 2 ITEM# 3

~~~~

M‘J J. BLIC WORKS

MJM:GC:slh

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVEIBPMENT

Staff Discussion: [ Date: 8/19/92

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 2 (CLA.03.B.m)

Clark County has negotiated a change order for the Van Buskirk Channel project. The change order represents an adjustment of bid quantities to reflect as-built quantities and includes extra work required at a junction structure. The net increase to the construction contract for Change Order Number 2 is $85,209.21. Current interlocal corrtract funding is sufficient to cover the increase.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee I AGENDA # 6A Date: 8/27/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee I AGENDA # 6A Date: 8/31/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

CLARK COUNTY MMRTMENT OF PUBLIC WDRKS

PAOJECT NO. F900711 SHEET I . O F 2 CONWXl NO. 2554-91 DATE - - PROJECT NAME Van Buskirk Channel Out fa l l

Ig Contri Construction. , oontractor. You are hereby directed to make the herein doacribe changes fran the plans a n d . specifications, oz do the follawing described wark not included in the plans and opecifhtiars on this amtract.

Qwge requested Public Works

(1) Esthte of increases and/or decreases In amtract item at contract prices: Final Ouantity Accounting $62,200.81 .

Cred i t Manhole Size Reduction 10 EA 8 $113/EA S[1,130.00~ Remove and Replace Structure 0 Flamingo $24,438.40

,008.40

Original Oontract Sum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $199898.678.Q0. Net change by previously authorized cbnge Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 m 0 " mtal cost this Change Orfkr (increase) (decrease). . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 85-1 Net contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.097.041.21 /

We, the undersigned Oontractmr, ha& given careful consideration to the changeprCsQ=dandhere$yagree,if this proposal is agprwed, that vn9 ,

w i l l provide all equiplwt, furnish al l materials, except as my otherrtfse be noted above, and perfom all aelxices necessary for the work atnm specified, and will accept as full paytent therefore the prices shum aboue..

of this pRopoad dwge,

1 be'all&&. days extension or of

CT ENGINEER

I' I i I 1

I I I I I

I

I I

I I I I I I I

I

c ?-

eUG-19-92

WE

D L4:17

I

1

P. b


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT PRESENTATION (CLA.03.D.91)


STAFF: Accept the presentation.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Accept the presentation.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Accept the presentation.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 4A

CLARK COUNTY

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM .-

I VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS

PETITIONER M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECEIVE A PRESENTA- TION ON VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THE INTERSECTIONS OF UNIVERSITY/MCLEOD AND HARMON/HARRISON, INCLUDING DETENTION BASIN utCtu.

FISCAL IMPACT: None

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Flood Control District has provided funding for the design of the Van Buskirk Channel Phase IV segment. The design is nearing completion and Clark County Public Works is prepared to make a presentation on the proposed improvements to the District.

MJM:WCB:slh

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA I T M DEVEIOPHENT

I

Staff Discussion: I Date: 8/19/92

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT PRESENTATION (CLA.03.D.91)

In accordance with District Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580, Clark County will make a presentation on the Van Buskirk Channel Phase N Improvements located between McLeod Drive and Harmon Avenue.

The presentation will also be made at the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting on August 31, 1992, at 3:30 p.m.


Accept the presentation.

~~~~ ~

Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee 1 AGENDA # 6B Date: 8/27/92

Recommendation:


~~

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee I AGENDA # 6B Date: 8/31/92

Recommendation:


http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-543.html

PROJECT PRESENTATION

VAN BUSKIRU CHANNEL - PHASE N IMPROVEMENTS

In accordance w i t h the requirements o f NRS Chapter 543.580, we are now proposing t o proceed with Van Buskirk Channel Phase N Improvements which l i e between the intersections of University Avenue/McLeod Drive and Harmon Avenue/Harrison Drive, including Detention Basin " C t l ; fur ther ident i f i ed on accompanying Exhibits A, 8, and C which d e p i c t the overall phasing, Phase N limits, and neighborhood channel routing. Design Plans are 90% complete and have been reviewed b y County and Flood Control District s t a f f s .

These Phase N Improvements are identif ied on the Regional Flood Control District's 1991 Las Vegas Valley Master Plan Update a s Faci l i ty Nos. 0212, 0237, and 0238. I t i s a prioritized project scheduled f o r F a l l , 1992 construction a t an estimated cost of $1,072,000 for. construction and construction engineering. Funding w i l l be accomplished by 1991 flood control bonds w i t h a l l work t o be completed within 150 calendar days from construction s t a r t , subsequent t o an es t ima ted 11 /17 /92 b i d award.

Ac tual work consis ts o f s tart ing a t the two 9' x 5 ' Phase 111 reinforced concrete boxes a t the southwest corner of University Avenue/McLeod Drive (Exhibit * P ) by joining the boxes w i t h a rectangular reinforced concrete channel. This rectangular configuration continues upstream along University Avenue westerly incorporating an l l - f o o t channel bottom t o a point where it turns south between existing blockwalls a s a 12-foot wide rectangular channel t o Detention Basin r r C t l .

A unique feature of Detention Basin clC'l i s t h a t the channel continues a s a rectangular 8-foot wide concrete channel diagonally across the basin. This segment i s designed t o pass 650 c. f . s . while allowing any excess to sp i l l -o f f on e i ther side; t h u s functioning a s a "peaking" basin d u r i n g a 100-year return storm drain event. Spill-over i s accomplished 'by setting freeboard height t o t h e 650 c . f . s . flow and allowing stormwater flow over the sides onto gabion splashblocks . The bas in w i l l drain by means o f two 18-inch f l a p valves a f t e r channel flow subsides.

A direct b e n e f i t o f this construction w i l l be t o remove 100-year return storm flooding from single-family residences along Bunker Circle, Campus Circle, McLeod Drive, Zane Circle, and Van Buskirk Circle where approximately 50 houses could s u f f e r varying e f fec t s o f flooding. I f we consider t h a t flood losses may approach $2O,OOO per residence on the average; then approximately $1,000,000 would be saved per event by the proposed construction, not to mention eliminating the propensity for injury or loss o f l i f e during flood events.


ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE: 90% SUBMITTAL

B I D SCHEDULE BASE B I D

I T E M APPROX. U N I T B I D NUMBER I T E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y . U N I T P R I C E T O T A L

109.01 CONSTRUCTION CONFLICTS AND A D D I T I O N A L WORK 1 L S $30,000 $ 30,000.00

109.02

200.01

202.01

203.01

302.01

302.02

402.01

502.01

502.02

502.03

603.01

609.01

609.02

613.01

613.02

TEMPORARY FLOOD CONTROL 1 L S

M O B I L I Z A T I O N 1 L S

REMOVE STRUCTURES & OBSTRUCTIONS 1 LS

BASIN EXCAVATION 19,107 CY

TYPE I 1 AGGREGATE BASE (ROADWAY) 226 TON

TYPE I AGGREGATE BASE (ROADWAY) 508 TON

PLANTMIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 283 TON

PNEUMATICALLY PLACED REINFORCED CONCRETE CHANNEL OR CAST I N PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE CHANNEL 1 L S

12 ' X 6 ' PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX 130 LF

CMU WALL 240 LF

24" DO.ol REINFORCED CONCRETE P I P E 66 LF

TYPE "C" DROP I N L E T L=12' D=5' 2 EA

TYPE "C" DROP I N L E T L=12' D=4' 2 EA

24" "L" TYPE CURB & GUTTER 204 LF

CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1,020 SF

$JOAJQ $ca-oD-aacr $ 20,000 $ 20,000.00

$180 .OOO $ 180,000.00

$ 3 $ 57,321.00

8 10 $ 2,260.00

$ 10 5,080.00

$ 35 $ 9,905.00

613.03 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER 534 S F $ 6 $ 3,XM-QQ

616.01 6 ' C H A I N L I N K FENCE 365 LF $ in $ 3,-

616.02 12 ' X 6 ' DOUBLE SWING GATE 3 EA $ 300 $ g n n m

623.01 250 W H.P.S. STREET LIGHT 1 EA $ 2.000 $ 2.000.00

624.01 TRAFFIC CONTROL 150 CAL DAYS $ 175 $ 26,250.00

661.01 GABION FOR OVERFLOW/EROSION PROTECTION 250 CY $ 85 $ 21,250.0Q

661.02 GABION RETAINING WALL 1,740 CY $ 10Q $ 174.-

.. '*

TOTAL $ 932,064.00

EXHIBIT "'A"

LEGEND L

m a m a a m

PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN SITE

PROPOSED CHANNEL/CULVERT ALIGNMENT

r' #*

I

L i

PHASE

.VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES

- VANBUSK 9/28/90 Kn

. . . .

EXHIBIT "8"

LEGEND

PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN SITE - PROPOSED CHANNEL/CULVERT ALIGNMENT

FLAMINGO ROAD

ROCHELLE AVENUE

___t ARMON AVENUE

W

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES

VANBUSK 9/28/90 K l L

-e- SCALE 1'=80' EXHIsrT'C"

L CURVE TABLE DESC. D E LTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD

c1 88- 14-09 60.00 92.40 58.18 83.54 c10 34-09-42 50.00 29.8 1 15.36 29.37

---


AGENDA ITEM


STAFF: Approve subject to acceptance of the project presentation.

TECHNICAL COMMI'ITEE: Approve.


RFCD AGENDA ITEM #4B Date: 9/10/92

CLARK COUNTY


AGENDA ITEM

SUEJEKX

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS

I PEnTIONER M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER

THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING OF THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL IV IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THE INTERSECTIONS OF UNIVERSITY/MCLEOD AND HARMON/HARRISON, INCLUDING DETENTION BASIN "C" .

FISCAL IMPACE $1,072,000.00 Total funded by Regional Flood Control

District (Fund 444).

BACKGROUND:

On January 9, 1992 an Interlocal Contract was entered into between Clark County and the Regional Flood Control District for preliminary engineering, engineering design and right-of-way engineering of the Van Buskirk Channel system improvements.

Ninety percent engineering design has been completed for this improvement. Therefore it is desirable to proceed with construction and construction engineering. This project phase will be constructed within existing right- of -way.

(Jd. J. MANNIN DIRECTOR OF WORKS MJM:WCB:slh

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEX

I

Staff Discussion: Date: 8/19/92

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (CLA.03.G.92)

Clark County has submitted a request for an Interlocal Contract for construction and construction engineering of the Van Buskirk Channel Phase IV Improvements. The amount requested is $1,072,000. All right-of-way has been obtained and 90 percent plans and specifications have been submitted to the District. The Van Buskirk Channel is programmed on the Bond Project List. Funding is available from the Bond Fund (Fund 444).


Approve subject to acceptance of the project presentation.

Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee

Recommendat ion:

Approve.

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee AGENDA # 6C Date: 8/31/92

Approve.

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT made and entered into as of the day of , 1992 by and between the Clark County- Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as.,- "DISTRICT, and County of Clark hereinafter referred to as llCOUNTYtt.

-

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the DISTRICT may approve a project to design and construct flood control improvements, and;

WHEREAS, the flood control improvements proposed herein are the same as those identified in the Master Plan Update, Structures No. VBCH 0212, 0237, and 0238 hereinafter referred to as ttPROJECTst; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on the attached Exhibit ltAtt; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has been approved by the DISTRICT on its annual project priority list; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located in the same hydrographic area as the Las Vegas Valley.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, contracts, and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT and the COUNTY agree to the following:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF THE PROJECT This INTERLOCAL CONTRACT applies to construction and

construction engineering of improvements associated with the Van Buskirk Channel between the intersections of University/McLeod and Harmon/Harrison, including Detention Basin rrC**. The basic improvements shall consist of flood water control facilities including a detention basin, pipes, channels, channel structures, channel access and other appurtenances as may be necessary to control flood waters. The improvements shall be funded through DISTRICT funds as herein described. The PROJECT is further identified and shown on the attached Exhibit rtA1t.

Page 1 , VANBUSKIRK/WCB/7-21-92


SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS The DISTRICT agrees to fund PROJECT costs within the limits

specified below:

1. The contract administration, construction engineering, inspection, testing, and survey shall not exceed $75,000.

2. The cost of construction shall not exceed $997,000.

3. The total cost of this CONTRACT shall not exceed $1,072,000 which includes all the items described in paragraphs one and two above.

A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental interlocal contract approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to payment of any addition funds.

SECTION I11 - GENERAL 1. The title sheet of both the plans and the specifications shall

show the Regional Flood Control District of Clark County as the funding agency.

2. The award of bid for the PROJECT shall occur no later than December 15, 1992. The COUNTY will take all reasonable steps possible to avoid delays in the construction of District funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal review by both the Technical Advisory Committee and the District Board of Directors. At the review, the COUNTY will have an opportunity to present information relative to the delays, measures taken to avoid the delays and the likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in view of the delays and limited available funding, whether project funding should continue. In the case that the Board chooses to discontinue funding, the Board may cancel any Interlocal Contract(s) associated with the PROJECT and discontinue funding for the remainder of the PROJECT. Funding already spent or appropriated by the COUNTY will not be required to be refunded to the District. PROJECT funding can be reconsidered at anytime when the COUNTY can demonstrate that the PROJECT can proceed on an acceptable schedule.

3. The COUNTY will comply with the Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

4. The COUNTY, its employees, and representatives shall at all times comply with all. applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules, and regulations in effect at the time work is performed on the PROJECT.

5. The COUNTY will require appropriate financial security for the construction of the PROJECT.

6. The COUNTY shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with the opportunity to provide the COUNTY with input relative to the following processes: scope of services development; consultant selection; design, construction and maintenance review; and monitoring of the effectiveness and impacts of facilities on flood flows.

7. Applicable portions of the current editions of the Policies and Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual, and Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage adopted by the DISTRICT will apply in developing this PROJECT unless specifically superseded by this CONTRACT.

8. Purchases of right-of-way in excess of that actually needed for construction will not be allowed unless a comparison between the cost of excess acquisition and needed acquisition including damages, indicates that benefits from such a transaction would result. Title to residual property will be vested in the name of the COUNTY. Revenues derived from the sale of these properties, less the cost of the sale of these properties, will be forwarded to the DISTRICT.

9. Administrative settlements and acceptance of counter offers involving right-of-way may only be made following a review and approval by the DISTRICT. .

10. The DISTRICT will make payment to the COUNTY, its contractor or its consultant , each month for project costs as outlined in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the categories noted below:

Page 3



a. Right-of -Way 1. Design & Surveying 2 . Appraisals, negotiations, land acquisition, legal

fees, escrow stamps, recording fees, etc. b. Predesign Engineering (all work prior to design,

c. Design Engineering d. Construction (all work after award of construction

e. Flood Insurance Rate Map amendments or revisions

excluding right-of-way)

contract)

11. Accurate documentation of all work performed and payments made will be maintained by the COUNTY for a period of three(3) years in hard copy form after final project approval and payment. Following the three year period, the COUNTY, shall keep records for permanent storage in original form or in microfilm/fiche media.

12. The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and/or audit all records pertaining to all projects both during and after project completion.

13. The COUNTY will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, consultants, contractors or agents arising under this Contract and hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom.

14. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be refunded by the COUNTY to the DISTRICT.

.

. .

Page 4

- .. -

15. The items covered in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS must be completed to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to July 1, 1993. The DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this CONTRACT after thirty (30) days notice.

Date of District Action: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BY : MICHAEL R. HARRIS, Chairman

ATTEST:

DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary

Approved as to Form:

BY: CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS, Deputy District Attorney

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date of Commission Action: COUNTY OF CLARK

BY : JAY BINGHAM, Chairman

ATTEST:

LORETTA BOWMAN, County Clerk

f:\usere\judy\agr\vnbskv.ic Page 5

EXHIBIT "A"

. . . .

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES

VANBUSK 9/28/90 KTL

. .


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

CHEYENNE CHANNEL FROM BUFFALO DRIVE TO GOWAN DETENTION BASINS - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS.13.A.92)


STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Approve.


RFCD AGENDA lTEM#5 Dak 9/10/92

CLARK COUNTY


BGFNDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

THE GOWAN SOUTH DETENTION BASIN INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF THE CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO DRIVE TO

PETITIONER:

CITY OF LAS VEGAS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: That the board approve the Interlocal Contract.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Design and Right-of-way Engineering $67,000

BACKGROUND:

Th is I n te r l oca l Con t rac t app l i es t o a1 1 costs for design and r ight-of-way engineering t o p l a c e i n serv ice the Cheyenne Channel - B u f f a l o D r i v e t o t h e 6owan South Detention Basin. The basic improvements s h a l l c o n s i s t o f f l oodwa te r f ac i l i t i es i nc lud ing p ip ing and i n l e t systems, channels, embankments, replacement o f a pre-fabricated arch bridge and other appurtenances as may be necessary to con t ro l f loodwaters . The City i s p resen t l y s ta r t i ng des ign o f t h i s P ro jec t and i s seek ing fund ing fo r th is work.

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 7 ITEM# 5

Richard D. Goecke, D i r e c t o r Department o f Publ ic Works

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVEIDPHENT

Staff Discussion: Date: 81 19/92

CHEYENNE CHANNEL FROM BUFFALO DRNE TO GOWAN DETENTION BASINS - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS. 13.A.92)

The City of Las Vegas has submitted a request for an Interlocal Contract to fund the design and right-of-way engineering of the Cheyenne Channel from Buffalo Drive to the Gowan Detention Basin. Staff understands that a library is proposed adjacent to the project. Also, that the City of Las Vegas has had discussions with the library district to coordinate the design effort with them. The library district will assist in funding construction of the project once the design is completed. The amount requested for the Cheyenne Channel project is $67,000. The project is identified on the FY 92/93 Project List and pay-as-you-go funds (Fund 443) axe available.


Approve.

Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee I AGENDA # 7 Date: 8/27/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee LEY # 7 Date: 8/31/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF THE

CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO DRIVE TO THE GOWAN SOUTH DETENTION BASIN

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, made and en tered in to as o f t h e day o f

, 1992 by and between the Clark County Regional Flood Control

D i s t r i c t , h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o as "DISTRICT" and City of Las Vegas, a

mun ic ipa l corpora t ion , here ina f te r re fe r red to as the "CITY".

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, pursuant t o Chapter 543 o f t h e Nevada Revised Statutes, the

DISTRICT may approve a p ro jec t t o des ign and cons t ruc t f lood con t ro l

improvements; and

WHEREAS, t h e p r o j e c t i s a r e g i o n a l f a c i l i t y d e s c r i b e d i n t h e Master Plan

w i th t he f o l l ow ing s t ruc tu re numbers: GOSO 0051 and GOO2 0000 here ina f te r

r e f e r r e d t o as "PROJECT"; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT i s i d e n t i f i e d and shown on the a t tached Exhib i t "A";

and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT i s a P r i o r i t y P r o j e c t approved by the DISTRICT Board

of D i rec to rs on the 92-93 Pro jec t L i s t ; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has reg iona l f lood con t ro l s ign i f i cance and i s l o c a t e d

i n the same hydrographic area as Clark County, the City o f Henderson, the City

o f Las Vegas and the City o f N o r t h Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, the CITY i s presen t l y s ta r t i ng des ign o f t h i s PROJECT and i s

seek ing fund ing fo r th is work.

. . .

1


1

2

-3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1, 1

--

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements

and promises o f the parties hereto, the DISTRICT authorizes the CITY to proceed

with the PROJECT as it is mutually understood and agreed as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT

This INTERLOCAL CONTRACT appl ies to all costs for design and right-of-way

engineering to place in service the Cheyenne Channel - Buffalo Drive to the Gowan South Detention Basin. The basic improvements shall consist of floodwater

facilities including piping and inlet systems, channels, embankments, replacement

of a pre-fabricated arch bridge and other appurtenances as may be necessary to

control floodwaters. The improvements shall be funded through DISTRICT funds as

herein described. This PROJECT is further identified and shown on the attached

Exhibit "A".

SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS The DISTRICT agrees to provide funding for PROJECT costs and shall not

exceed the limits specified below:

1. Design and right-of-way engineering shall not exceed $67,000.

A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental

inter1 oca1 contract approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to

payment of any additional funds.

SECTION I1 I - GENERAL 1. The DISTRICT shall be shown on the title sheet of both the plans and

specifications as the funding agency.

2. The award of bid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than December

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

3.

4.

5.

31, 1993. The CITY will take a1 1 reasonable steps possible to.

avoid delays i n the cons t ruc t i on o f DISTRICT-funded pro jec ts .

PROJECT delays more than four months, as measured from the award

date, may be s u b j e c t t o a formal review by both the Technical

Advisory Committee and the DISTRICT Board o f D i r e c t o r s . A t the

review, the CITY will have an oppor tun i ty to p resent in fo rmat ion

r e l a t i v e t o t h e d e l a y s , measures taken to avo id the de lays and the

1 i kel i hood o f those delays continuing. The Board wi 11 make a

determination, i n view o f the de lays and l im i ted ava i lab le fund ing ,

whether PROJECT funding should continue. I n the case t h a t t h e Board

chooses to d iscont inue funding, the Board may cancel any I n t e r l o c a l

Contract (s) assoc iated wi th the PROJECT and d iscont inue funding for

the remainder o f the PROJECT. Funding already spent or appropriated

by the CITY will not be r e q u i r e d t o be refunded t o t h e DISTRICT.

Pro ject funding can be reconsidered at any t ime when the CITY can

demonstrate t h a t t h e PROJECT can proceed on an acceptable schedule.

The CITY will comply with the Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 o f

the Nevada Revised Statutes.

The CITY, i t s employees and rep resen ta t i ves sha l l a t a l l t imes

comply w i t h a l l a p p l i c a b l e laws, ordinances, statutes, rules and

regu la t ions in e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e work i s performed on the PROJECT.

The CITY will requ i re app rop r ia te f i nanc ia l secu r i t y f o r PROJECT

const ruct ion.

3


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

-

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

6. The CITY sha l l p rov ide a l l impacted en t i t ies and the DISTRICT w i t h

the oppor tun i ty to prov ide the CITY w i t h i n p u t r e l a t i v e t o t h e

fol lowing processes: scope of services development; consul tant

select ion; design, construction and maintenance review; and

moni tor ing o f the e f fect iveness and impacts o f f a c i l i t i e s on f l o o d

f 1 ows . 7. Any and a l l a p p l i c a b l e p o r t i o n s o f t h e c u r r e n t e d i t i o n s o f t h e

DISTRICT’s Po l i c ies and Procedures, the Hydro log ic Cr i te r ia and

Drainage Manual and the Uni form Regulat ions for Control of Drainage

PROJECT unless adopted by the DISTRICT will apply i n deve lop ing th is

s p e c i f i c a l l y superseded by the In ter loca l Contract .

8 . Purchases o f r i g h t - o f - w a y i n excess o f t h a t a c t u a l l y needed f o r

const ruct ion will not be allowed unless a comparison between the

c o s t o f excess acqu is i t i on and needed acqu is i t ion , inc lud ing

damages, ind icates that benef i ts f rom such a t ransact ion would

r e s u l t . T i t l e t o r e s i d u a l p r o p e r t y will be vested i n t h e name o f

the CITY. Revenues derived from the sale of these propert ies, less

the cost o f the sa le o f these proper t ies, will be forwarded t o t h e

DISTRICT.

9. Administrat ive sett lements and acceptance of counter o f f e r s

involv ing r ight-of-way may only be made fo l l ow ing a review approval

by the DISTRICT.

10. The DISTRICT will make payment t o t h e CITY, i t s c o n t r a c t o r o r i t s

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

a 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

consultant each month for project costs as out1 ined in SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the

categories noted below:

a. Right-of-Way

1. Design and Surveying

2. Appraisals, negotiations, land acquisition, legal fees,

escrow stamps, recording fees, etc.

b. Pre-design Engineering (all work prior to design, excluding

right-of-way)

c. Design Engineering

11. Accurate documentation of all work performed and payments made will

be maintained by the CITY for a period of three (3) years in hard

copy form after final projects approval and payment. Following the

three-year period, the CITY shall keep records for permanent storage

in original form or in microfilm/fiche media.

12. The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and/or audit all records

pertaining to all PROJECTS both during and after PROJECT completion.

13. The CITY will be responsible for any loss, damage, 1 iabil ity, cost

or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees,

consultants, contractors or agents arising under this Contract and

hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom.

14. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be

refunded by the CITY to the DISTRICT.

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

-

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

15. The CITY, as the administer ing agency, will provide the DISTRICT

16.

17.

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

wi th t he i n fo rma t ion requ i red i n NRS 543.580 and sha l l p resent tha t

i n fo rma t ion o ra l l y t o t he C i t i zens ’ Adv i so ry Committee, Technical

Advisory Committee and the Board o f D i rec to rs .

The items covered i n SECTION I 1 - PROJECT COSTS must be completed t o

t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e DISTRICT p r i o r t o December 31, 1994. The

DISTRICT may, a t any t i m e thereaf ter , grant extens ions or terminate

t h i s C o n t r a c t a f t e r t h i r t y (30) days no t ice and may r e q u i r e a l l sums

advanced t o t h e CITY be repaid.

The CITY a t i t s own d i sc re t i on may use the se rv i ces o f a consul tant

fo r the comple t ion o f work i d e n t i f i e d i n SECTION I - SCOPE OF

PROJECT and the DISTRICT will not be a p a r t y t o such an agreement.

However, the use o f any consul tant will n o t e n t i t l e CITY t o

addi t ional funds beyond t h a t s p e c i f i e d i n SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS

as hereinabove set forth.

6


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

18. The CITY will provide the DISTRICT wi th pre l iminary p lans, 1

spec i f i ca t i ons and cost est imates for review and comments.

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, t h i s I n t e r l o c a l C o n t r a c t i s hereby executed as o f t h e

d a t e f i r s t s e t f o r t h above.

DATE OF DISTRICT ACTION:

ATTEST:

DEANNA LEFKO, SECRETARY

APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY AND FORM:

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

DATE OF COUNCIL ACTION:

ATTEST:

KATHLEEN TIGHE, C ITY CLERK

. . .

. . .

. . . P:\AGREE\CHEVCHAN.DES


BY:

MICHAEL R. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN

CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY :

JAN LAVERTY JONES, MAYOR

7

CLARK COUNTY 'REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

SUBTECT:

HEMENWAY VALLEY FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (BOU.Ol.A.87)


STAFF: Approve.


CITIZENS COMMI?TEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 9110192


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: Seventh Supplemental lnterlocal Agreement for Hemenway Valley Wash Improvements

PETITIONER: City of Boulder City.

RECOMMENDATION: That the Regional Flood Control District (RFCD) approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the Seventh Supplemental lnterlocal Agreement for the design, construction, material testing and surveying of the Hemenway Valley Wash Improvements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Current Interlocal Agreements $5,356,000 This request Total

$1 60,000 $5,516,000

BACKGROUND: The low bid for the Hemenway Valley Flood Control Project was $5,389,904.35, and with related engineering & construction administration-inspection,the project funding was $5,666,000 plus $250,000 from Boulder City/NDOT (See Page 2 attached)


TAC AGENDA ITEM # 8

Boulder City, Nevada Page 1 of 2 12-Aug-92

Seventh Supplemental interlocal Agreement Hemenway Valley Wash Agenda Item

Through the Fifth and Sixth Supplemental Agreements, District funding has been reduced from $5,666,000 to $5,356,000. Contract Change Orders 1 and 2 have also reduced the construction and survey cost from $5,389,904.25 to $5,079,970.37.

The Seventh Supplemental Agreement will address two areas of the project:

a. Our original estimate was that contract administration, testing and inspection could be completed for $180,000 or 4% of construction; but based on expenses for the first six months, these services are estimated to be $297,000 or 6% of the construction cost, an increase of $107.000 and represents increased efforts by the City in coordination of the project.

b. The City had proposed to complete the gabion basket construction using Division of Forestry and prison labor; however, the Nevada Labor Commission believes,at the present time, that this violated several State Statues. To complete this construction at the contract bid price will require $53,000 of additional funding.

Boulder City is requesting additional funding in the amount of $160,000. After authorization of additional funding, appropriate purchase orders or contract change orders will allocate these additional funds.

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEWEIDPHENT

Staff Discussion: Date: 8/ 19/92

HEMENWAY VALLEY FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (BOU.Ol.A.87)

The City of Boulder City has requested an additional $16O,O00 for the Hemenway Valley Flood' IC Control Improvement project. The amount requested will cover additional costs incurred for increased efforts in construction engineering and for construction of gabion baskets. The Seventh Supplemental Interlocal Contract totals $5,516,000 which includes the requested increase of $160,000. Funding is available from pay-as-you-go funds (Fund 443).

Staff Recommendation: ~~~

Approve.

Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee I AGENDA # 8 Date: 8/27/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee I AGENDA # 8 Date: 8/31/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

F M H S U P P M F N T M Hemenway Valley Wash Floodway

THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of . 1992, by and between the City of Boulder City, a political

subdivision, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and the County of Clark, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY".

WlTNESSETH

Statutes, a Master Plan project to design, perform construction inspection and construct flood control improvements for the Hemenway Wash Floodway, hereinafter collectively referred to as PROJECT, shown on the attached Exhibit "A", being located wholly within the incorporated area of the CITY, and within a hydrographic area common to the COUNTY, has been approved by the DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised

WHEREAS, pursuant thereto, an Interlocal Agreement was entered into on the 3rd day of November, 1987, between the CITY, the DISTRICT and the COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, on the 13th day of September, 1990, a First Supplemental Interlocal Agreement was entered into between the CITY, the DISTRICT, and the COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, on the 2nd day of April, 1991, a Second Supplemental Interlocal Agreement was entered into between the CITY, the DISTRICT, and the COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1991, a Third Supplemental lnterlocal Agreement was entered into between the CITY, the DISTRICT, and the COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, on the 26th day of November, 1991, a Fourth Supplemental Interlocal Agreement was entered into between the CITY, the DISTRICT, and the COUNTY; and


Hemenway Valley Wash floodway

WHEREAS, on the 13th day of February, 1992, a Fifth Supplemental Interlocal Agreement was entered into between the CITY, the DISTRICT, and the COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, on the 1 l t h day of June 1992, a Sixth Supplemental lnterlocal Agreement was entered into between the City, the District and the County; and

WHEREAS, it is desired to further supplement the aforementioned agreements to clarify the intent thereof and adjust funding for construction, material testing and surveying.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the terms contained herein, the parties agree to modify the lnterlocal Agreement as follows:

1. Section I 1 - Project Costs as previously amended on September 13, 1990, April 2, 1991, September 12, 1991, November 26, 1991 and June 11, 1992, is deleted in its entirety and the following is inserted in lieu thereof: The DISTRICT agrees to provide funding for project costs within the limits specified below:

1. The engineering and design shall not exceed $336,000. 2. Construction administration including material testing shall

3. The construction including survey, shall not exceed

4. The total cost of this DNTERLOCAL AGREEMENT shall not exceed

not exceed $287,000.00

$4,893,000.00

$5.5lS.QD0.00. A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental agreement approved to increase any of the amounts noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.

2. The remainder of the original Interlocal Agreement shall remain unchanged.

2

Hemenway Valley Wash Floodway

ATTEST: CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BY; DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary MICHAEL HARRIS, Chairman

Date of Board Action

Approved as to Legality and Form:

By: CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS, Deputy District Attorney

ATTEST: CITY OF BOULDER CITY

BY; VICKI G. BERGDALE, City Clerk ERIC L. LUNDGAARD, Mayor

Date of Council Action:

ATTEST: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

BY; LORETTA BOWMAN, County Clerk JAY BINGHAM, Chairman

Date of Commission Action:

3

- . - -

IMPROYLMENTS


AGENDA ITEM L

SUBJECT:

GOWAN DETENTION SYSTEM - SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS.03.C.91)


STAFF: To be given at the meeting.

TECHNICAL COMMI'ITEE: Consider at the Special Technical Advisory Committee meeting on September 10, 1992 at 8:lO a.m.

SPEC. TAC RFCD AGENDA ITEM #1 ITEM #7'

CLARK COUNTY


~ ~~

SUBJECT: Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract for the Construction of the Gowan Detention System PETITIONER: City of Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: That the Board approve the Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract.

FISCAL IMPACT: None. (Modi f i cation of Project cost requested). BACKGROUND: It is anticipated that on August 31 construction crews will begin work on the Gowan Detention Basins (Gowan Road and Buffalo Drive) near Eisenberg and Kahre Elementary School s haul ing some 1.2 mi 1 1 ion cubic yards of soi 1 to a facility at Cheyenne Avenue and Buffalo Drive. Heavy machinery will be traveling along Buffalo Drive approximately every 50 seconds from 6:OO a.m. to 4:OO p.m. daily and will continue to do this for the next 180 days. In regard to this situation, student safety is of paramount concern.

City Public Works staff have been working with School District Transportation Department staff to determine the need for busing to and from the above two elementary schools the approximately 400 students who live in this area . It is the City’s position that busing these students is the safest way to get them t o and from school in a manner that would not subject them to the heavy construction traffic in the area. From a safety standpoint, we are of the opinion there is no other alternative.

On August 19 the City was officially notified by the School District that buses would not be provided to transport these students due to budget eoastralnts which have been placed upon the School District during this fiscal year. Therefore, the burden of cost for transporting these students 1 ies with the City. Mr. Matt Wallace of the School District Transportation Department advised the City that five buses would be necessary to transport approximately 400 students. Based on information obtained from Hr. Wallace this translates to: 5 buses x $40/day x 129 school days = $25,800. City staff would increase this amount to $30,000 in order to allow for any unforeseen circumstances that would extend the period of busing beyond the original 180 days. The City requests reimbursement for these costs be retroactive to the date this busing is first provided by the School District regarding thi s Project .

Richard D. Goecke, Director Department o f Pub1 ic Works

SPECIAL

ITEM# 1 ITEM# 7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1.1.

& -

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOWAN DETENTION SYSTEM

THIS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT made and en tered in to as of

t h i s day o f , 1992, by and between the C la rk County

Reg iona l F lood Cont ro l D is t r i c t , here ina f te r re fe r red to as the "DISTRICT" and

the City o f Las Vegas, a mun ic ipa l corpora t ion , here ina f te r re fe r red to as the

"CITY 'I.

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, an Inter local Contract dated November 14, 1991 was en tered in to

between the DISTRICT and the CITY fo r the cons t ruc t ion o f F lood Cont ro l

Improvements described i n t h e DISTRICT Master Plan Update o f t h e Las Vegas

Valley, August, 1991 as F a c i l i t y Nos. GON00000, GON00008, and GOSOOOOO, GOS00051.

A Supplemental In ter loca l Contract was subsequently approved by the Board o f

D i rec to rs on August 13, 1992 adjust ing the amount a l lowed for the const ruct ion

o f t h i s PROJECT as a r e s u l t o f a low b id award o f $6,267,723.86; and

WHEREAS, the CITY requests supplementing t h i s I n t e r l o c a l C o n t r a c t t o

p rov ide fo r the cos t o f bus ing s tudents res id ing in the PROJECT area (the area

bounded by US95 and Bu f fa lo and Cheyenne and Alexander plus the Desert Shores

development) t o Kahre Elementary School and Eisenberg Elementary School f o r t h e i r

safety and well being during the construction period of approximately 180 days.

NOW, THEREFORE, i n cons ide ra t i on o f the covenants, condit ions, agreements,

and promises o f the par t ies hereto, the DISTRICT author izes the CITY t o proceed

w i th t he PROJECT as i t i s mutually understood and agreed as fo l lows:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

1. SECTION I 1 - PROJECTS COSTS i s r e v i s e d t o read:

The DISTRICT agrees to p rov ide f und ing f o r t he PROJECT w i t h i n t h e l i m i t s -

spec i f i ed below:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Const ruc t ion a t a c o s t n o t t o exceed $6,970,000.

Busing a t a c o s t n o t t o exceed $30,000. Costs incur red p r io r

to execut ion da te o f t h i s c o n t r a c t wi 11 be reimbursed.

Construct ion engineer ing a t a cos t no t t o exceed $500,000.

Tota l PROJECT cos t sha l l no t exceed $7,500,000.

A wr i t ten request must be made t o t h e DISTRICT and a

Supplemental In te r loca l Cont rac t approved to i nc rease any

amounts noted above p r i o r t o t h e payment o f any add i t iona l

funds . The remainder o f the o r ig ina l In te r loca l Cont rac t da ted November 14, 1991

and the Supplemental In ter loca l Contract dated August 13, 1992 shal l remain

unchanged.

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, t h i s SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT i s hereby

executed as o f t h e d a t e f i r s t above set for th .

DATE OF COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY :

ATTEST : JAN LAVERTY JONES, MAYOR

KATHLEEN TIGHE, CITY CLERK

. . .

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

..-

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

ACT ION :

ATTEST :

DEANNA LEFKO, SECRETARY

APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY AND FORM:

~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~

CHRISTOPHER D. FIGGINS

DEPUTY D I S T R I C T ATTORNEY

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . . P:\Agr*e\GDBCONST.25

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL D I S T R I C T

BY:

MICHAEL R. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN

3

GOWAN DETENTION BASIN PHASE 1 NUMBER 3

INDEX l. GOWAN SOUTH DETENTION

BASIN, W400 AC-f.7

2. 72w RCP, L-2690

3. GOWAN NOYTH DETENTION BASIN, Vp900 AC-FT

4. 8' X 8' RCB; d Lm440'

5. 66- RCP, L-210'

A


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

LAS VEGAS WASH BETWEEN CRAIG ROAD AND C M C CENTER DRIVE - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 (NLV.Ol.B.87)


STAFF: Approve.


CITIZENS COMMI'ITEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 9110192

CLARK COUNTY


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJE-. Change Order No. 1-Asbuilt for the Las Vegas Wash between Craig Road and Civic Center Drive, AKA the King Charles Diversion Channel

P ~ O N E R : Gary W. Holler, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Las Vegas


It is recommended that the Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board approve the Change Order.

FISCAL IMPACT: The current Interlocal Contract funding is sufficient to cover Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $14,539.89.

BACKGROUND:

Change Order No. 1-Asbuilt has been prepared which increases the cost of construction by $14,539.89, due to additional costs experienced in the course of construction of this project. This change order amounts to 0.80% of the approved contract.


AG-148

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVEIXlPWENT

I Staff Discussion: Date: 8/ 19/92

LAS VEGAS WASH BETWEEN CRAIG ROAD AND C M C CENTER DRIVE - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 (NLV.Ol.B.87)

The City of North L a s Vegas has negotiated a change order for the Las Vegas Wash project between Craig Road and Civic Center Drive (aka King Charles Diversion Channel Project). The change order represents conflicts experienced during the construction of the project as itemized on Pay Estimate No. 9, included in the backup. The net increase to the construction contract for Change Order Number 1 is $14,539.89. Current i n t e r l d contract funding is sufficient to cover the increase.

Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee

CITY OF NORTH IAS MOAS ENGINEERING DIVISION

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 - ASBUILT

PROJECT: King Charles Diversion Channel, Ph. II CONTRACTOR: Max Riggs ConstNctlon

This Change Order reflects the asbulh project costs based upon actual measured quantities of constructed items.

The folk

I==

E P-

~ 11. 10.

P-

ring are the actual increases and/or decreases in c d:

x mtract items at contracl

&-Bulk Change &-

Net

644.00

0 201 .00 0 137.00

0 158.00

0

1,022.00 0

2,281 .00 0

1,187.00 3

1,200.00

0 1 .00 0 1 .00 0 1 .w

0 1 .oo 0 1 .00 0

4,500.00 0

1.97 0.97

40,OOO. 00 0

1.00 0

t prlces8 . DiffWWlCe

$0.00.

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

We, the undersigned contractor, have given c a r e f u l consideration to the changes proposed and hereby agree, If this proposal is approved, that wo provided all equipment, furnished all materiak, except as may otherwise be noted above, and performed a l l senrices necesary for the work specified, and will accept as fu l l payment therefor the prices shown.

W Accepted by:

(Date)


AGENDA I"

SUBJECT:

VARIANCE REQUEST FOR LOT 71 OF LAUGHLIN ESTATES UNIT 1

STAFF:


Approve subject to the property owner signing a hold harmless waiver, releasing the District and Clark County from any flooding liability.

TECHNICAL COMMI'ITEE: Follow staffs recommendation.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Follow staffs recommendation.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM19 Date: 9/10/92

CLARK COUNTY


AGENDA ITEM . 'e

VARIANCE LOT 71 - LAUGHLIN ESTATES UNIT 1

PETITIONER M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER I THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE A VARIANCE FOR THE ELEVATION REQUIREMENT ON LOT 71 IN LAUGHLIN ESTATES UNIT 1, 3699 CATALINA, LAUGHLIN, NEVADA.

I

FISCAL IMPACT: None

BACKGROUND:

Lot 71 in Laughlin Estates Unit 1 located in the Unnamed Wash flood hazard area; designated as an A0 zone depth of flooding 1 foot on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. Many lots in Laughlin Estates Unit 1 were built upon prior to the adoption of the current Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage. In order to build a home on Lot 71, the owner is required to fill Lot 71 to an elevation significantly higher than the adjacent lots. The higher lot would not be consistent with the existing homes in the neighborhood.

Clark County has a created a Special Improvement District and the Regional Flood Control District has provided funding for the construction of flood improvements to remove the Laughlin Estates from the flood hazard designated area.

W J . WORKS

MJM:DC: s l h

RFCD Agenda Page 2

On the basis of the proposed flood control improvements, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has issued a conditional letter of map revision for this area. Advertisements for construction bids for the Unnamed Wash flood control facilities will occur in August, 1992 and construction should begin in November, 1992. On this basis, a variance of the higher elevation requirement would be practical and consistent with existing structures in Laughlin Estates.

Specifically, this will request a variance from Section 10.100 ( B ) ( l ) ( A ) of the Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage, which requires that the lowest floor be elevated to 18 inches above the 100-year flood depth. The proposed finished floor will be elevated 9 inches above the 100-year flood depth. Therefore,.the proposed finished floor will be elevated 21 inches above the highest adjacent grade.

Regional Flood Control District

AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT I Continued Staff Discussion: I Date: 8/5/92

~~


The information submitted by Clark County is insufficient to evaluate the request as stated above.

I Staff Recommendation:

Resubmit with more information to evaluate the request.

Discussion By Special Technical Advisory Committee

Clark County was requested to resubmit the item with further information.

l2r-L # 2 Date: 8/13/92

Recommendation:

Hold for next regular Technical Advisory Committee meeting in August.

Discussion By Board of Directors

Recommendation:

Hold for next regular meeting.

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPWENT

Staff Discussion:

VARIANCE R E Q m T FOR LOT 71 OF LAUGHLIN ESTATES UNIT 1

This item was held from the August 13, 1992 Special Technical Advisory Committee meeting pending submittal of additional information from Clark County and advice from legal council on the variance request. Clark County has clarified the variance request on the agenda item.

Clark County has requested a variance from Section 10.100 (B) (1) (a) of the "Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage" for Lot 71 of Laughlin Estates Unit 1. Section 10.100 (€3) (1) (a) of the Regulations states:

"New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor elevated to a minimum of eighteen inches(l8") above the base flood elevation. If the base flood elevation is specified as a depth, it is to be measured from the 'highest adjacent grade.' "

Highest adjacent grade is defined in Section 8 of the Regulations as:

". . . the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of the structure."

Clark County requests that the lowest floor be elevated to nine inches (9") above the base flood elevation instead of the eighteen inches (18") as stated in the Regulations. Staff understands that the property is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area labeled "Zone A 0 (Depth 1; Velocity 5 FPS)" on Panel 32003 2015B of the September 29, 1989, Clark County, Nevada, Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).

The basis for the variance request is as follows:

1. The fill required by the Regulations would make this property significantly higher then adjacent lots.

2. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) for the Unnamed Wash Flood Control improvements.

3. Clark County has created a Special Improvement District and the Regional Flood Control District has provided funding for construction of the Unnamed Wash Project.

4. Clark County expects to advertise for construction of the Unnamed Wash Improvement Project in August, 1992 and construction is anticipated to begin in November 1992. The construction of the project will remove Laughlin Estates from the Special Flood Hazard Area.

continued I

AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Regional Flood Control District

Continued Staff Discussion: Date: 9/ 1/92


Staff comments on the variance request:

1. FEMA has issued a CLOMR which is a letter of belief that once the project is built that

.a

the FIRM would be revised to remove the Special Flood Hazard Area in Laughlin Estates; however, the FIRM is not officially revised by FEMA until the project is constructed and supporting documentation is provided to FEMA for final review.

2. FEMA’s minimum requirement is to elevate the lowest floor at or above the base flood elevation. The Regulations are more stringent due to the hydrologic and hydraulic conditions found in Clark County and arid regions.

3. Staff takes no exceptions to the request, inasmuch as construction of the Unnamed Wash Project will begin shortly, and when completed, will provide flood protection to this area; and the variance request still meets FEMA’s minimum requirements.

I Staff Recommendation:

Approve subject to property owner executing a release and waiver (in agenda backup) which holds the District and Clark County harmless from any flooding that may occur on the owner’s

I Discussion By Technical Advisory Committee 1 AGENDA # 10 Date: 8/27/92

Recommendation:

Follow staff‘s recommendation.

Discussion By Citizens Advisory Committee AGENDA # 10 Date: 8/31/92

I Recommendation:

Follow staff‘s recommendation.

F.2

RELEASE AND WAIVER EXECUTED on ?

1992, by and #

hereinafter referred to as RELEASOR, owner(6) of property

generally described a6 Lot 71 of Laughlin Estates Unit 1 and more

specifically described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this

reference incorporated herein, to the County of Clark and the

Clark County Regional Flood Control District, their officers,

employees, agents and representatives hereinafter referred to as

RELEASEES.

IN CONSIDERATION of the RELEASEES granting of a variance

from Section 10(B) (1) ( A ) of the Uniform Regulations for the

Control of Drainage, which requires that the lowest floor be

elevated to eighteen (18) inches above the hundred year flood

depth, to allow RELEASOR to have a finished f loor elevation of

only nine (9 ) inches above t h e hundred year flood depth, RELEASOR

hereby assumes all risk in connection with any flooding which may

occur on RELEASOR'S property. RELEASOR further agrees to release

and hold harmless RELEASEES from all claims, demands and causes

of action, present and future, known or unknown, including any

and all c.laims and causes of action for damages for personal

injury, death or property which may occur as a result of any

flooding or potential flooding on RELEASOR'S property.

IN EXECUTING this Release, RELEASOR acknowledges that

RELEASOR'S property is located in an area designated as a Special

1

Flood Hazard Area labeled "Zone A 0 (Depth 1; Velocity 5 FPS)" on

Panel 32003 2015B of the September 29, 1989, Clark County, Nevada

Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRm), and that building on said

property may create an inherently dangerous situation should

flooding occur in the area, and with reapect to RELEASEE,

RELEASOR assumes a l l risks, known or unknown, associated with

flooding which may occur on RELEASOR'S premises.

.. 'e

RELEASOR FVRTHER WARRANTS that this Release is executed

without reliance on any statement, representation or action by

RELEASEES.

RELEASOR WARRANTS that he or she is of lawful age and

legally competent to sign this Release; that he or she has fully

informed himself or herself of the contents of the Release by

reading it before signing it; that the terms hereby are

contractual and not merely recitals and that this document has

been signed upon his or her own free will.

RELEASOR agrees that this document will be recorded in the

Clark County Recorder's Office and that this Release is binding

upon RELEASOR, his or her heirs, estates, executors,

administrators, representatives and assigns.

IT WITNESS WHERE I have executed this Release at

, on the day and year first above written.

RELEASOR

RELEASOR

2

STATE OF NEVADA, 1

COUNTY OF CLARK, 1 ) 66:

On this day of 1992, before me

, Notary Public, personally appeared I personally known to me to be the

person whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and

acknowledge that he/she executed it.

(Notary’s Signature)

3


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL - 1992 ANNUAL UPDATE


STAFF: Review/discuss and approve the amendment to Section 16.0 - Facility Maintenance

TECHNICAL COMMIlTEE: Follow staff's recommendation

CITIZENS COMMITIEE: Follow staff's recommendation

ITEM# 10


SUBJECT:


I VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEIUCHIEF ENGINEER I RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

REVIEW/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

The District’s Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 18.0, provides that the policies and procedures will be reviewed in August of each year. The last amendment to the manual was adopted by the Board in February 1992. This was due to the lengthy process involved with coordinating and preparing the changes.

At the direction of the Board, staff has prepared language to amend the Policies and Procedures in Section 16.0 Facility Maintenance as follows:

Maintenance of flood control facilities identified on the Master Plan will be performed in accordance with the Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual. Entities are required to submit interlocal contracts annually for maintenance funding with an annual maintenance work plan and a maintenance schedule by facility as exhibits to the funding contract. mese schedules must spec@ the estimuted dokrs plrznned for each f a c m by UCti*.

The entity is also responsible for preparing the agenda item to be presented to the District Board. The finalized annual maintenance wonk plans must be presented to the Dsstrict Board in June of each year so that iffirndbg is available and authorized, those maintenance wonk plans can begin on July I of the new fiscal year.

Quartedy status reports must be submitted by the entities to the District on the fonn pmvided for that purpose. (See Exhibit F.) TIrese status reports must

TAC AGENDA

Date: 9110192 Date: 8/27/92 ITEMX10 ITEM13 RFCD AGENDA

. report the work completed on each faciUy by activ&. TIre report is to be in pmgmss dollars, not in expended dollars. The teporting quruters are as follows:

1st Quarter - July thmugh September 2nd Quarter - October thmugh December 3nl Quarter - January thmugh March 4th Quafler - Apd thmugh June

TIre Quartedy status mprts am due in the Wrict ofice 30 days q/terthe close of the Quarter.

M e r the Annual Maintenance Work PSan is appmved by the Boanl, it is the msponsibil& of each entity to mquest, in wdting, the District -to open up purchase oniers for work to be paid by the M&t. Reimbursement for maintenance services will edy be made in compliance with the Policies and Procedures munual and the annual interlocal contract.


..

Vikidia Valentine, P.E. Gen'kral Managerkhief Engineer

TAC AGENDA ITEM#3

RFCD AGENDA

Dak 9/10/92 Date: 8/27/92 ITEM#lO

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Staff Discussion: Date: 9/ 1 /92 r


The agenda item shows the changes staff has proposed to Section 16.0 - Facility Maintenance. The Citizens Advisory Committee requested a change in Section 4.7 - Project Status, which they subsequently withdrew.


Reviewldiscussion and possible action to approve the amendment to Section 16.0 - Facility Maintenance.

I

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA # 3 Date: 8/27/92

The Technical Advisory Committee discussed the changes as proposed by staff and the Citizens Advisory Committee. They voted unanimously to recommend approval of Section 16.0 - Facility Maintenance only, excluding the request by the Citizens Advisory Committee to amend that portion related to project delays.

Recommendation:

Approve amendment to the Policies and Procedures, Section 16.0 - Facility Maintenance.

Discussion by Citiaem Advisory C ~ W t t m : AGENDA # 3 Date: 8/31/92

After further review and discussion, the Citizens Advisory Committee voted unanimously to withdraw their request to amend the Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 4.7 - Project Status.

Recommendation:

I Follow the staff's recommendation. I

EXHIBIT F REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM STATUS REPORT /

Entity: Dateprepared:

Project: FORCE

ACCOUNT/ APPROVED .AMENDED SCHEDULED WORK PLAN WORK PLAN PERCENT COMPLETION

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT QUARTER:

' .'K TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT QUARTER:

Consubnt/Contractor:

Project Manager: Phone Number: . . * - - T - - . I I - T - T T '

- --.-r---


AGENDA ITEM .e

SUF3JECT:

DETENTION BASIN LANDSCAPING

STAFF:


Receive report and direct staff.

RFCD AGENDA ITEMU 11 Dak 9110192


AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT:

DETENTION BASIN LANDSCAPING

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA BAX-VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER


THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE THE REPORT AND DIRECT STAFF AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

At the August 13, 1992 Board meeting it was requested that staff develop landscaping cost estimates for the detention basins proposed on the Ten Year Construction Program. The review included an examination of aerial photos to determine the presence of development adjacent to the basins. Based on existing use, predictions were made regarding the likelihood of development occurring adjacent to the basins within the next ten years. Considering this information and estimated embankment lengths, cost estimates were prepared for landscaping the proposed detention basins using the landscape costs for the Oakey Detention Basin as a basis.

There are 14 detention basins proposed on the Ten Year Construction Program for which funding may conceivably be requested. That estimated cost is approximately $3,630,000. The 14 projects include the Gowan Detention Basins and the Oakey Detention Basin with landscaping costs at $410,000 and $200,000, respectively. The backup includes a list of detention basins on the Ten Year Construction Program and am estimate of Pmdmping costs for each.

Rcspectrully submitted,

'3 /

TAC AGENDA ITEM# 11 ITEM # RFCD AGENDA

Date. 9/10/92 Date.

AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Regional Flood Control District

Staff Discussion: DETENTION BASIN LANDSCAPING

I Date: 9/02/92

At the August 13, 1992 Board meeting it was requested that staff develop landscaping cost estimates for the detention basins proposed on the Ten Year Construction Program. Staff has developed landscaping cost estimates which take into account an estimate of embankment length and if development adjacent to the basins is existing or expected.


Receive report and direct staff as deemed appropriate.

Discussion By

Recommendation:

Discussion By

Recommendation:


SUBJECT:

KERN RIVER GAS PIPELINE

I VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGWCHIEF ENGINEER


THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO DIRECT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TO REPRESENT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IN MATIERS RELATED TO THE KERN RIVER GAS PIPELINE.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

In September 1989, the Kern River Gas Company filed condemnation proceedings against Clark County, the City of Las Vegas, and the City of North Las Vegas for the purpose of obtaining the necessary property in order to place its 36-inch high pressure gas line. Subsequently, the United States District Court granted Kern River the right to occupy the entities’ road rights-of- way.

Recently, the County’s damage experts, Brechler & Bell Consulting Engineers, submitted a report which indicated that there are eleven (1 1) future flood control facilities that are in conflict with Kern River’s gas pipeline. Total damages to the Clark County Regional Flood Control District’s facilities resulting from the pipeline are estimated above $60O,oOO. A trial on the issues relating to damages is set for later this month (September 1992).

Staff requests that the Board authorize the General Manager to direct the District Attorney’s Office to appear on behalf of the Regional Flood Control District in order to plead and defend the property and interest of the District, should this matter proceed to trial.

Vir%& Bdx-Val&tine, P.E. - - -

G e n a ManagerlChief Engineer

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA lTEMX12 Date: 9110192

SEP 81 ’92 16:17 P. 2

MEMORANDUM REX BELL

OFFICE OF THE DJSTRICT ATTORNEY -- ClVJL DIVISION DISI’WCT All#RNEY

TO: VIRGINIA BAX-VALENTINE, General Manager/Chicf Engineer

FROM: CHIUSTOPHER D. FIGGMS, Deputy District Attorney a? SUBJECT: Kern River Gas Pipeline

DATE: September 1,1992

In September, 1989, the Kern River Gas Company filed condemnation proceedings against Clark County, the City of Las Vegas and the City of North Las Vcgas for the purpose of obtaining the necessary property in order to place its 36-inch high prtssurc: gas line. Subsequently, the United States District Court granted K m River the right to occupy the entities’ fddd rights-of-way.

Recently, the County’s damage experts, Beckler & Bell Consulting Engineers, submitted a report which indicated that there are 1 1 future Flood Control facilities that are in conflict with Kern River’s gas pipeline, Total damages to the Clark County Regional Flood Control District’s facilities resulting from the pipeline is estimated above $6OO,OOO,OO. A trial on the issues relating to damages is s e t for later this month.

NRS 37.080 provides as follows:

All persons in occupation of, or having or claiming an interest in, any of the properly described in the complaint, or in the damages for the taking thereof, though not namd, may appcar, plead and defend, each in rcspcct to his own property or interest, or that claimed by him, in like manner as if named in the complaint.

Staff requests that the Board authorize the District Attorney’s Office to appear on behalf of the Regional Fld Control District in order to pltad and defend the property and interest of the District should this matter proceed to trial,

:gs


SUBJECT:

PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA BAX-VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER


THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

The following Projects Status Reports for the month of August 1992 are submitted for your review:

92/93 PROJECT LIST AND BOND PROJECTS

a) Project Charts b) Project Summary Sheets c) Clark County d) City of L a s Vegas e) City of Boulder City f ) City of Henderson g) City of North Las Vegas

OTHER PROJECTS OF INTEREST a) Clark County - Hiko Springs Remapping b) City of Las Vegas - Gowan North Channel c) Henderson - Pittman Wash Phase II d) Regional Flood Control District


TAC AGENDA

Date: ITEM#^^ ITEM # RFCD AGENDA

Date: 9/10/92

Catherine A. Razor U.- Project Administration Coordinator

CLARK COUNTY PROJECT STATUS CHART AS OF 813 1 I92

DUCK CREEK BRIDGES

E RANGE WASH DETENTION BASIN

FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PALOS VERBC

FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PARADISE

WINNICK AVE IMPROV

RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Annie Oaklsy to Palm Mtn Vista, Pecos, Sandhill

SLOAN CHANNEL

TROPICANA DETENTION BASIN

VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM

VAN BUSKIRK RIGHT-OF-WAY I I I

I I

X

CLARK COUNTY - OUTLYING PROJECT STATUS CHART AS OF 8/31/92

BUNKERVILLE CHANNEL

GOODSPRINGS

HlKO SPRINGS

LOGAN WASH - Area 1

Area 2

MUDDY RIVER WEST LEVEE

NELSON FLOOD CONTROL

SEARCHLIGHT FLOOD CONTROL

UNNAMED WASH

1992 1993 1994

Jul Aug !Sap Oct NW Doc Jan Fob M n Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob I I

IOl l lHOLD I I

!

CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECTSTATUSCHART AS OF 8/31/92

ALTA STORM DRAIN (Meadow V)

ANGEL PARK DB EXPANSION

BUFFALO CHANNEUDoe-Westcliff9

BUFFALO CH(Summerlii-Vega$)

BUFFALO CH(Westcliff-Summerlin~

CHEYENNE CHANNEL

CAREYllAKE MEAD DET. BASIN

GOWANlCAM 10 & LONE MTN

GOWAN DETENTION BASIN

GOWAN OUTFALL

OAKEY BL DET BASIN SYSTEM

OAKEY COLLECTION SYSTEM

RAMPART STORM DRAIN

WASHINGTON AVE. SYSTEM DESIGN

WASHINGTON AVE. ROW

WASHlNGTONlSANDHlLL OUTLET

WASHINGTONISANDHILL-VIRGIL CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTSTATUSCHART AS OF 8/31 I92

BOULDER CITY HEMENWAY WASH

HENDERSON C-1 CHANNEL SYSTEM

PllTMAN WASH - PHASE 111

SUNSET DETENTION BASIN

UPRR CHANNEL

MESQUITE TOWN WASH DET. BASIN

NORTH LAS VEGAS GOWAN OUTFALLPHASE I

KYLE CANYON DET. BASIN

NLV DETENTION BASIN-OUTLET

UPPER LV WASH DET BASIN

WEST RANGE WASH DIKE

DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS 0

I I I IDONE IDONE I ON HOLD I IAdvisorv Board and envir reauirements Goodsprings Flood Control I I I I I 11 add'l month delay due to environmental Improvements

construction delayed 1 month to find Logan Wash Div X1- Moapa

reschedule pending resolution of SI0 funding Hiko Springs Channel-LaugMin requirements 12/93 9/93 d+ 1 9/92 d + 2 NOW 8303,000

Logan Wash Div. 12 - Moapa DONE DONE NOW

County continues consideration of Master Nelson Hood Control Improvements

right-of-way delay due to numerous property Muddy Rirer West Levee - Moapa 09/92

8800,000 diswsal araa within BLM determined aree 02/93 12/92 d + l DONE DONE

NOW owners. Droiect on hold. ON HOLD

Seerchlight flood Control

,lm~rovemants 8346,000 NOW 9/92 d + 2

groiect -1- Shading indicate* "-4 funded

9/93 d+2 12/92 d + 2 DONE DONE 84,100,000 $4.1 00,000 Jauahlin . ' :

Unnanmd Wash Improvement/ - 12/93 09/93

Plan scauisition DroDosd 1 edd'l month delay due to anvir raauirments end riaht-of-wav easements

~~

d + indicates cumulative delay in months since 6130/92

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL SCHEDULE CHANGE FROM DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS PREVIOUS MONTH

-3-

II REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PLZEPARED: Q8/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: AUGUST 31

PROJECT: PUCK CREEK BRIDGES AT TOMIYASU AND PACHUCA

DESCRIPTION: NEW BRIDGES OVER DUCK CREEK AT PACHUCA AND TOMIYASU

PERCENT COMPLETE: - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S645,OOO.OO

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )

DESIGN >0/01/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 12/01/92

~~~~~

CONSTRUCTION START ~~

01/01/93

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE ~ ~~

06/01/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : HEFNER

CONSTRUCTION PRIbdE CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: DETERMINED RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERACH REQUIRED ON TOMIYASU.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED SUPPLEMENTAL HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS. BEGAN FINAL DESIGN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE FINAL DESIGN.

-..

PROJECT W A G E R : PlND PHONE #: 455-8339

I . .


PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92

REVIEOJ PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: AUGUST 31

PROJECT: EAST RANGE WASH DETENTION FACILITY

DESCRIPTION: DETENTION BASIN AND 0UTLET.CHANNEL FACILITIES

PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S9.387.500.00


DESIGN 12/03/92

R/W CLgARAETCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 01/07/93

CONSTRUCTION START 01/20/93

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 01/28/94

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: DOYLE ENGINEERING CORP.

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: BCC APPROVED PESC CONTRACT 03/17/92.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED PRE-DESIGN AND GEOTECHNICAL. MET WITH GENERAL GRIFFITH. BASE COMMANDER, ON 08/21/92.

~ ~~~-

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE REVIEW OF DRAFT PRE-DESIGN WITH USAF. AIR FORCE ACCEPTS DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPT - ARRANGE MEETING WITH GENERAL GRIFFITH, BASE COMMANDER.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE IC: 455-7707

-5-

. REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT L


REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: &UGUST 31 PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH - BRIDGE AT PALOS VERDES STREET DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ROAD CROSSING TO ACCOMMODATE 100-YEAR

STORM. DESIGN & CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $450.000.00

DESIGN

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)

03/24/91

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARAETCES 91/01/91

BIDS OPEN 05/01/91


CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 07/19/92 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: =A

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: RIGGS

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: UNDERGROUND WATER AND TELEPHONE CONFLICTS. RAINS HAVE CAUSED PROJECT TO BE DELAYED.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: WORKING ON CLOSE-OUT DOCUMENTS.

PROJECT MANAGER: FOSTER PHONE #: 455-8334

-6-

- - - - r ' 1 1 T ' T

. II REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: AUGUST 31 PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH - BRIDGE AT PARADISE ROAD DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT BRIDGE TO ACCOMMODATE 100 YEAR STORM EVENT.

DESIGN & CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $750,000. O Q

DESIGN

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION; (DATES )

93/24/91

R/W CLEARANCES

KNVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 05/01/91



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : MEA

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: RIGGS

PROJECT W A G E R : FOSTER PHONE #: 455-8334

-7-

II RBGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT


ENTIW: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92

REXIEW PERIOD FROM: JLUGUST 1 TO: AUGUST 31

PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH AT WINNICK AVENUE

DESCRIPTION: COLLECT FLAMINGO WASH AND DISCHARGE AT KOVAL

PERCENT COMPLETE: fi E S T I M A m COST OF PROJECT: ~4.300.000.00


DESIGN 09/30/92

R/W CLEARAEJCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN J.1/30/92

CONSTRUCTION START >2/30/92


CONSULTANT/PROJ'ECT WOTAGER: F.C. WALLACE


PELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: INVESTIGATION OF A WORKING HYDRAULIC MODEL.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: PROCEED WITH WORKING MODEL.

'I

PROJECT W A G E R : BAND PHONg #: 455-8339

-8-

. - - -- - 'T - ' I 1

ll REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92

REWIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: AUGUST 31

PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I - ANNIE OAKLEY TO PALM DESCRIPTION: COMPLETE REMAINING RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS

PERCENT COMPLETE: 99% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.000.000.00


DESIGN 02/28/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES ~~

BIDS OPEN 04/02/92


CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

JVORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH; CONTRACTOR COMPLETED CHANNEL LINING. SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION ON 08/18/92. PERFORMED PUNCH LIST WALK-THROUGH ON 08/20/92.

FORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE PUNCH LIST WORK.

PROJECT MANAGER: WONDRA PHONE #: 455-7707

-9-


PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PRBPARBD: 08/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: AUGUST 3 1

PROJZCT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I1 - CROSSINGS DESCRIPTION: PECOS. SANDHILL. MTN VISTA - COMPLETE REMAINING PROJECT

COMPONENTS

PERCENT COMPLETE: 2 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0

DESIGN


06/30/92

BIDS OPEN 98 /27 /92 ~ ~~~ ~~

CONSTRUCTION START J0/01/92


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:


II POTHOLE AND SURVEY AND COORDINATION WITH SOUTHWEST GAS.

WORK COMPLETED IN RENT MONTH: 11 ADVERTISED ON OiK7/:2% HELD PRE-BID ON 08/27/92 . BEGAN DESIGN ON

II NEXT PHASE OF RA~~JHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT TOMIY;ASU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, ANNIE OAKLEY DRIVE, PEARL STREET, AND MCLEOD DR. (PHASE 111).

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE DESIGN ON NEXT PHASE AND PREPARE SCHEDULE FOR ADVERTISING. OPEN RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS PHASE I1 BIDS ON 09/11/92 AND HOLD RFCD AWARD ON 09 /24 /92 .

A .

PROJECT MANAGER: DTANESE PHONE #: 455-8309

-10-


DESCRIPTION: ROCHELLE/HILDEBRAND TO PECOS-MCLEOD & VIKING - ALSO DETENTION BASIN E

PERCENT COMPLETE: e%. ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.500.000.00

DESIGN


11/09/92

R/# CLEARANCES

EXVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 12/16/92



~ ~~~ ~~~~

CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : SEA



WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: REVIEWED PRE-DESIGN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH; CONTINUE DESIGN.

\

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707

-11-


PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE P61EPAREDt 08/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: PUGUST 31

PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE 111) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - ROCHELLE TO UNIVERSITY/MCLEOD.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 8% ESTIMATEI) COST OF PROJECT: $922.000.00


DESIGN 06/08/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 0 8 / 0 5 / 9 2



CONSULTANT/PROJEET W A G E R : MEA

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTOR


WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH; PROJECT AWARDED ON 08/18/92 TO PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.

PROJECT MANAGER: CEDERBURG. G. PHONE #: 455-7742

-12-

.. ._ ~- - 'T -

~~

REGIONAL


ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: Q8/30/92

-1- PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: ,?LUGUST 31

PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IV) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES & DETENTION BASIN C BETWEEN

MCLEOD/UNIVERSITY & KARMON/HARRISON INTERSECTIONS

PERCENT C-LETE: 65% ESTIMATED COST OF PROjECT: S1.072.000.00


DESIGN 99/08/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 30/08/92


CONSTRUCTION COXPLETE 94/30/93

CONSULTANT/PROjECT W A G E R : DELTA ENGINEERING


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS.

V TIED TO BASIN C OUTFALL. SPECIAL SOILS INVESTIGAT~ON ON BASIN c DUE TO HIGH WATER TABLE. PHASE

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED FINAL REVIEW OF 100% PLANS.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ADVERTISE ON 09/10/92.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONS #: 455-7707

-13-

ll REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT


ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PRgPARED: 08/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: FUGUST 1 TO: PUGUST 31 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE V)

.-

DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES BETWEEN HARMON/HARRISON JNTERSECTION & TROPICANA AVE.

PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTfMATED COST OF PROJECT: ~1.627.000.00

DESIGN

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION; . (DATES)

08/14/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CL-CES

BIDS OPEN >0/08/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : PENTACORE


WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED DESIGN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: I/ ADVERTISE ON 09/11/92 (AFTER PHASE IV).

PROJECT MANAGER: B W T PHONE #: 455-7707

-14-

.. ._ - - + -





PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE VI) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - EASTERN/TOMPKINS TO MARYLAND/RENO

& SPENCER - TROPICANA TO RENO AND DETENTION BASIN A

PERCENT COMPLETE: 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4.870.000.00


DESIGN 10/27/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 12/02/92

CONSTRUCTION START 01/14/93 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 99/16/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: JM MONTGOMERY



WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: REVIEWED PRE-DESIGN.

PROJECT W A G E R : BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707

-15-

RBGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT


ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PRgPARED: 08/30/92


PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - ROW ACOUISTION DESCRIPTION: APPRAISE AND ACOUIRE ROW FOR DETENTION BASIN SITES.

PERCENT COMPLETE: le%: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S3.100.000.00


DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES 12/30/92

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTAN!F/PROJECT W A G E R :

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CO-CTOR:


FORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMMENCED NEGOTIATIONS ON SITE 0.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS ON SITE 0.

.--. ,

PROJECT W A G E R : LAND PHONE #: 455-8300

r , I -



ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: Q8/30/92


PROJECT: BUNKERVILLE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL FROM HIGHWAY THRU TOWN & EARTHEN CHANNEL FROM EDGE OF TOWN TO VIRGIN RIVER. DESIGN ONLY.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 8%. ESTMdATED COST OF PROJECT: $1.714.648.00

DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION;

(DATES)


ENVIR CLEARANCES 98/01/93

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


~~

CONSDLTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP

CONSTRUCTION PRIBSB CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT ON HOLD DUE TO PROJECT PROTEST BY BUNKERVILLE TAB. PROJECT WILL BE DELAYED DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: SCHEDULED MEETING WITH KENYON LEAVITT, CHAIRMAN OF BUNKERVILLE TAB.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CLOSE OUT CONTRACT WITH MARK GROUP. MEET WITH BUNKERVILLE TAB TO DISCUSS CURRENTLY DESIGNED 11 PROJECT AND THE REQUESTED FUTURE DETENTION SITE.

PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PHOrJE #: 455-8309

-17-



ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREP-: 08/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: &UGUST 1 TO: JAUGUST 31 PROJECT: GOODSPRINGS - FLOOD CONTROL DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT BERM AND CHANNEL ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF

TOWN AND WIDEN CHANNEL ALONG PACIFIC ST. ON NORTH SIDE OF TOWN.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 7 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:

DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:

(DATES )

99/28/92

$99,000.00



BIDS OPEN 08/15/93



CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. WALLACE


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DELAY DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. ACQUISITION OF ROW WITHIN SAN PEDRO AVE. TO PROPOSED DISCHARGE POINT.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN EFFORTS.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE DESIGN.

+

PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PRO= #: 455-8309


PROJECT STATUS REPORT II IZNTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92

REVIm PERIOD FROM: &UGUST 1 TO: JLUGUST 31

PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY ON HIKO SPRINGS TO CONTROL 100-yEm FLOWS.

FACILITIES INCLUDE DETENTION BASIN, CHANNEL, AND FIVE BRIDGES.

PERCEWT COMPLETE: 4& ESTIMATED COST OF PROJ’ECT: $19.000.000.00


(DATES 1

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: BOYLE ENG’G


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: SCHEDULE IS DEPENDENT ON SID FUNDING,LESS THAN 50% SUPPORT AT PRESENT

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE TO SCHEDULE SID STEPS TO DETERMINE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL.

I!

PHONE #: 455-7707 PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT

-19-



EWCITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92


PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA 1

DESCRIPTION: DESIGN DIVERSION OF LOGAN WASH INTO ANDERSON WASH TO REDUCE PEAK FLOWS.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 8% ESTIWLTED COST OF PROJECT: s690.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES 1

DESIGN 08/24/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLgARANCES

BIDS OPEN >0/08/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : DAMES & MOORE


I1 PRE-DETERMINED AREA.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED DESIGN OF DIVERSION BERM AND ROAD.

11 WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE FOR ADDITIONAL

li DESIGN. NEGOTIATE WITH CONSULTANT.

PROJECT W A G E R : REZABECK PHONE #: 455-8303

-20-




REVIEW PERIOD FROM: &UGUST 1 TO: &UGUST 31

PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA 2

DESCRIPTION: INLET STRUCTURE AT UPRR BRIDGE. TWO 10' X 8 ' RCBS, CROSSING AT SR 169 AND OPEN CHANNEL.

PERCENT C-LETE: 8& ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:

DESIGN


01/03/92

S3.269.540.0Q

R/W CLBAWiNCES 02/15/92


BIDS OPEW 94/23/92

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : PAMES & MOORE

CONSTRUCTION PRIWE CONTRACTOR: MEADOW VALLEY

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: NEWTON PROPERTY CAUSING DELAY. NEWTON TO DEDICATE ROW. IN-HOUSE UNDERGROUND DESIGN AND BCC APPROVED $200,000 CHANGE ORDER TO CONSTRUCT 2 10' CAST IN PLACE PIPES INSTEAD OF OPEN CHANNEL.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH; NEWTON CHANNEL GOING UNDERGROUND. WROTE NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROW DEDICATION.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ISSUE NTP.

PROJECT W A G E R : REZABEK PHONE I: 455-8303

-21-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ~ ~~~~


DESCRIPTION: DESIGN EARTH LEVEE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE RIVER TO CONTAIN 100-YEAR STORM.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 1% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2,439,118.00


DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START

~ ~~~~


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT SCHEDULE & DATES TO BE REVISED ONCE PROJECT PROBLEMS RESOLVED. ID & ACQUISITION OF ROW & EASEMENTS FROM THE 60 PLUS PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE EXTREMELY LENGTHY.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: MET DENNIS JOHNSON OF RFCD AND DAVE MALPASS OF MARK GROUP. REVIEWED ROW PLATS AND MAPS AND SENT CORRECTIONS TO MARK GROUP.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: MEET WITH RFCD ON AUGUMENTATION OF SCOPE-OF-WORK.

PROJECT MANAGER: REZABEK PHONE #: 455-8303

-22-




REVIEW PERIOD FRW: AUGUST 1 TO: IAUGUST 31

PROJECT: JVELSON FLOOD CONTROL

DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT DIVERSION BERM UPSTREAM OF ROAD. WIDEN CHANNEL AND DIP,

PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S70.000.00


DESIGN

R/W CLgARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G C WALLACE

CONSTRUCTION PRIm CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: COST OF FACILITIES EXCEEDS BUDGETED AMOUNT. MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROPOSES ACQUIRING PROPERTY IN LIEU OF BUILDING FACILITIES.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: MEET WITH RFCD TO DISCUSS COURSE OF ACTION FOR THE RECOMMENDED MASTER PLAN FACILITIES.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE

-23-

PHONE #: 455-8309

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT


REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: &UGUST 31 PROJECT: SEARCHLIGHT - DIKE DESCRIPTION: MASTER PLAN STRUCTURES #5014. 5015, 5016 & 5017

PERCENT COXPLETE : 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $172,000.00


DESIGN 09/24/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ISNVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93

BIDS OPEN 07/27/93



CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G C WALLACE

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTIZACTOR:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 90% PLAN SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE DESIGN.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309

-24-




REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: JiUGUST 31 PROJECT: JJAUGHLIN - UNNAMED WASH DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY ON THE UNAMED WASH TO CONTROL 100-YEAR STORM

FLOWS. FACILITIES INCLUDE CHANNEL. SEDIMENT BASIN AND BRIDGE ON NEEDLES HWY.

PERCENT COXPLETE: 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S8.000.000.00


(DATES )

06/15/91


ENVIR CLEAWWCES 12/01/91 BIDS OPEN 10/09/92 CONSTRUCTION START 32/15/92


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SIMONS, LI & ASSOCIATES


LAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: 11 !iOV. ORDER HEARING ON 06-04-91--64% PROTEST. SECOND TRY AS SID. EPA WANTS MITIGATION PLAN IN PLACE & REVIEWED PRIOR TO 404 PERMIT ISSUANCE. APPROVAL OF 47 ACRES FROM COLORADO RIWR COMM. TO CC.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 404 PERMIT APPPLICATION PENDING - - USEPA REVIEW RETURNED.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT M 11 REVIEW FINAL PLANS & SPECS. COE TgZT. MITIGATION NEEDS. SET DESIGN TO REPLACE ONE LEVEE/PROPERTY OWNER REQUEST. II

PROJEXT MANAGER: BUNDT -25-,

PHONE #: 455-7707


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 08/31/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM : 07/31/92 TO: 08/31/92

PROJECT: Buffalo Channel - Doe to Westcliff

DESCRIPTION: Box culvert imwovements along Buffalo from Doe to Westcliff .-

PERCENT COMPLETE: 20 $6 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT 8 6,500,000 DESIGN RTC & CCRFCD

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dates)

DESIGN Mav - 1993 RMI CLEARANCE Mav - 1993 ENVIR CLEARANCES Mav - 1993 BIDS OPEN SeDtember - 1993

CONSTRUCTION START DATE October - 1993

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE October - 1994

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: VTN - Nevada/ Ken Gilbreth, PE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:-

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREA:

,


30% design submitted for review.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

CLV and CCRFCD to review 30% submittal. Design to continue toward the 70% submittal.

PROJECT MANAGER: Dave Nathan, PE PHONE #: 229-6272

WMTAlTOM\DSISTAlL& -26-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT

ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 0813 1 I92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM : 07/31/92 TO: 08131192

PROJECT: Buffalo Channel (Summerlin to Veaasl DESCRIPTION: Channel or Box Culvert lmorovements alona the Pioneer Alianment from

Summerlin Parkway to Veaas Drive. PERCENT COMPLETE: 93 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $~,OOO,OOO


(dates)

DESIGN Sentember - 92 RIW CLEARANCE Complete ENVlR CLEARANCES Complete BIDS OPEN October - 92 CONSTRUCTION START DATE November - 92

*

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE AD^ - 93

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: VTN - Nevada1 Ken Gilbreth, PE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: NIA


Coordination with Tennington Ridge subdivision development caused a two week delay in 100% submittal. Conflicts with the channel and proposed sewer line in Pioneer - Washington intersection.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: (Design Phase)

Project presented to CCRFCD and construction funding approved.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: (Design Phase)

Project presented to CCRFCD and construction funding approved.


Review 100% submittal and Obtain signatures.



Review 100% submittal and Obtain signatures.


WPOATA\TOM\OS\STATLJS -27-


ENTITY: C i v of Las Veoas DATE PREPARED: 0813 1/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM : 07131192 TO: 08l31192

PROJECT: Buffalo Channel (Westcliff to Summerlin) DESCRIPTION: Oversizing of RTC Project (Buffalo Interchange)

PERCENT COMPLETE: 35 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 486,282 CONSTRUCTION CCRFCD PORTION ONLY


DESIGN Complete RIW CLEARANCE Complete ENVlR CLEARANCES ComDlete BIDS OPEN March - 92 CONSTRUCTION START DATE June - 92

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Mav - 93

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: GB&L/ George Brizendine, PE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: Max Riqgs Construction



Box culvert completed across Westcliff. The entire project is approximately 35% complete. The Box culvert for the Buffalo Channel is approximately 80% complete.


Continue placement of the box culvert.

PROJECT MANAGER: Brian Walsh, PE PHONE #: 229-6736

WPDATA\TOM\DS\STATUS -28-

~ - . * -



REVIEW PERIOD FROM : 07/31/92 TO: 08/31/92

PROJECT: CLW-4 (Phase II)

DESCRIPTION: Carev-Lake Mead Detention Basin at North Las Veaas Aimort

PERCENT COMPLETE: 93 SC ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4,000,000 CONSTRUCTION


DESIGN April - 1991 RPN CLEARANCE Mav - 1991 ENVlR CLEARANCES Januarv - 1991 BIDS OPEN SeDtember - 1991 CONSTRUCTION START DATE November - 91

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE SeDtember - 82

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: VTN - NevadalKen Gilbreth, PE


The contractor has not completed on schedule, liquidated damages started July 3, 1992.


Completed the Detention Basin.


Walk through scheduled for September 2, 1992. Finalize Project.

PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen. PE PHONE #: 229-221 2

WPDATAITDMIDSISTANS -29-


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 0813 1/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM : 07131192 TO: 08131192

PROJECT: CLVV.3 Gowan North and South Detention Basins DESCRIPTION: Construction of detention basins and 72inch connector pipe.

PERCENT COMPLETE 7 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $6,300,000 CONSTRUCTION


DESIGN Complete RIW CLEARANCE Complete ENVlR CLEARANCES Complete BIDS OPEN June - 92 CONSTRUCTION START DATE JUIV - 92

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE JUIV - 93

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: Poaaemever Desian GroudLarrv Carroll


chool buses needed for children to EisenbergIKahre Elementary schools. Haul road will disrupte traffic in CheyenneIBuffalo area.


New 8-inch sewer north of Buckskin along Tenaya, new 8-inch sewer along Dalegrove. The 72-inch RCP along Tenaya is nearly complete and the road is open. The bwer north basin is excavated to the subgrade in the berm area.


Complete the 72-inch D-50, and the 60-inch RCP along Gowan. Begin hauling from the lower north basin to the south basin berm. Upper north basin grading.

PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas D. Chiatovich, PE PHONE #: 229-6276

WPDATA\TOM\OS\STANS -30-


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 08/31 192


PROJECT: CLVV-3 DESCRIPTION: Gowan Detention Basin Outfall

PERCENT COMPLETE: 65 $b ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4,400,000 CONSTRUCTION


DESIGN Complete RN CLEARANCE Complete ENVlR CLEARANCES None Needed BIDS OPEN Januarv - 92

CONSTRUCTION START DATE A~ril - 92

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Januarv - 93 CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: Poaclemever Desian GroudLanv Carroll



Placed 8 x 5 RCB up to Shermcrest on Gowan. The section of Gowan Road h m Bradley to Decatw is ready to be repavad.


Finish the 18-inch sanitary sewer to Rainbow and start the 8'x 5 RCB from Torrey Pines to Rainbow. Put the asphalt down between Bradley and Decatur.

PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas D. Chiatovich, PE PHONE #: 229-6276

WPDATAITOMIDSISTANS -31-




PROJECT: CLVV - 5 DESCRIPTION: Oakev Boulevard Detention and Convevance . . ' k

PERCENT COMPLETE: 99 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $12,000,000 DESIGN


DESIGN June - 92 R/W CLEARANCE Alianment beina rcauired ENVIR CLEARANCES Under Review BIDS OPEN November - 92 CONSTRUCTION START DATE December - 92

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE SeDtember - 93

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: Bovle Enaineering ComIGerald Moleton. PE


Section 14 modified Environmental Impact Statement was sent to the BLM on June 15, 1992. BLM requested additional information on EarthQuake impacts on the Detention Basin. The project will be bid as soon as BLM approval is obtained.


Boyle Engineering has been updating the Bid Documents to include conditions from the residence of the area and the C i y Council. Haul roads and the locations to place the fill on the Community Collage property have been discussed and approved.


Complete supplemental agreement for Professional Services to include Construction Administration, landscaping and offsite improvements by Soyle Engineering.

PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, PE PHONE #: 229-6272

WPDATAITOMIDSISTA~ -32-

. . - -. - _ T -

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT

ENTITY: Citv of Las Veoas DATE PREPARED: 08/31/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM : 07/31/92 TO: 08/31 192

PROJECT Ramuart Storm Drain DESCRIPTION: Oversizino of the RTC Ramuart Storm Drain Svstem

PERCENT COMPLETE 12 $6 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $ 9300.000 DESIGN


DESIGN Mav - 1993 RIW CLEARANCE Mav - 1993 ENVIR CLEARANCES Mav - 1993 BIDS OPEN Auaust - 1993 CONSTRUCTION START DATE Seutember - 1993

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE November - 1994

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: G.C. Wallacel Scott Hummer, PE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:



Drainage study in progress.


Submit Design Report.

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: G.C. Wallacel Scott Hummer, PE CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:



Drainage study in progress.


Submit Design Report.


WPOATAITOMIDStSTATUS -33-


LNTITY: Ci tv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 08131192

R M E W PERIOD FROM : 07131192 TO: 08130192

PROJECT: Washinaton Avenue Svstem (from Vi i i Street to Lena Street) DESCRIPTION: Triale 12' X 8 RCB

PERCENT COMPLETE 95 SC ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $2,437,000 DESIGN


DESIGN Auaust- 92 RIW CLEARANCE Comdete ENVlR CLEARANCES ComDlete BIDS OPEN Not Scheduled CONSTRUCTION START DATE Not Scheduled

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Not Scheduled *

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: MEAlLsumal Gubler. PE


* Construction depends on future funding.

100% Submittal completed.

Review and approve 100% submittal

PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, PE PHONE #: 229.6272

-34-


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 08131192 \

RENEW PERIOD FROM : 07/31/92 TO: 08/31/92

PROJECT: Washinaton Avenue Svstem I Sandhill Outlet DESCRIPTION: TriDle 12’ X 8 RCB from the Las Veaas Wash to Washington Avenue.

PERCENT COMPLETE 99 K ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1.7001100 CONSTRUCTION

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (drtot)

DESIGN C m l e t e RIW CLEARANCE Comlete ENNR CLEARANCES Comlete

BIDS OPEN Januarv - 92

CONSli3UCTlON START DATE March - 92

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Aumt - 92

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: MEAlLawnal Gubler. PE -


WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH.

Walk through and punch list completed.


PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, PE PHONE #: 2298272

WPOATA\TOM\DS\STANS -35-


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 0813 1/92


PROJECT: Washinaton Avenue System (from Sandhill to Viil) DESCRIPTION: Triple 12' X 8' RCB

PERCENT COMPLETE: 89 n ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2,437,000 DESIGN


DESIGN Mav - 92 RIW CLEARANCE ComDlete ENVlR CLEARANCES Comdete BIDS OPEN Not Scheduled CONSTRUCTION START DATE Not Scheduled

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Not Scheduled

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: MEAlLaurnal Gubler, PE


hnding depends on BLM approval of section 14 Envinwwnental Impact Statement for the Oakey Detention Basin


On hold waiting for BLM approval.


Bid project as soon as BLM accepts EIS for Oakey Detention Basin ( sea delays above). Complete supplemental agreement #2 for professional services for construction administration by MEA.

PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, PE PHONE #: 229-8212

-36- WPDATAITOYKJSNANT

RECEIVE^ REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT REGIONAL

FLOOD CONTROL DISTR,, ENTIW: Boulder City DATE PREPARED: 9/01/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: August 1 - August 31, 1992

PROJECT Hemenway Valley Flood C o n t r o l . 'a

DESCRIPTION: Wide shallow flood plain with control low flow channel and stabilized bank, detension basins, debris basins, outlet works, pipes, channel, dikes, culverts, & other appurtenances.

PERCENT COMPLETE 700h ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $5,666,000.00

scHuxlLEoFooMpLET1oN: (dates)

DESIGN Sep-91

WW CLEARANCES N/A

ENVlR CLEARANCES N/A

BIDS OPEN Oct -9 1

START CONSTRUCTION Jan-92

CONSlRUCTlONcoMpLETE Jan-93

CONSULTANTPROJECTMANAGER: Coe & Van Loo, Paul Hoskins

CONSTRUCTON PRIME CONTRACTOR: Max Riggs Construction Co.

t 1 DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

W O R K T O B E C O M P L E T E D D U R I N G ~ ~ Complete missing sections of main channel, Colorado Street and NDOT paths; and both basin spillways.

WORKTO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXTMONTH:

Complete concrete channel bottom & sideslope of upper Trailhead Channel. Start landscape & rail construction.

L J

PROJECT MANAGER: Phillip T. Henry -- PHONE 293-9200

-37-



%Nmr City of Henderson DATE Aumst 31. 1992

REVIEW PERIOD: FROM: Aurmst 1. 1992 TO: Aurmst 31. 1992

PROJECT: C-1 Channel System Desip

DESCRIPTION: pesim of 6 miles of concrete channel. 2 miles of piDe. and two detention basins with about 500 AF of storaee,

PERCENT COMPLETE: 30 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ ~ . O O O

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dam)

DESIGN March. 1993

R./W CLEARANCES December. 1992

ENVIR CLEARANCES December. 1992

BIDS OPEN A d . 1993

START CONSTRUCTION Mav. 1993

CONSTRUCIlON COMPLETE November. 1993

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: VTNKen Gdbreth

CONSTRUCI'ION PRIME CONTRACTOR: None

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None.

. ..

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Held public hearing and reviewed predesign report.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Finalize pre-design report and select an alternate to begin design.

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Ch andler PHONE # 565-2329 ..

. .

- *. 3

Y O R D P g R R D A r A \ C l S T form -psr 10/26/90

-38-

. -



ENTITY City of Henderson DATE-st 3 1. 1992

REVIEW PERIOD: FROM:&st 1.1992 TO: Aurmst 31. 1992

PROJECI': Pittman Wash Channel Phase III

DESCRIPTI0N:Concrete lined channel amroximatelv 4500 feet long with a wacitv of 1&,600 cfs. Extends from Duck Creek to SteDhanie Street.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 75 5% ..

ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECI': $3.800.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (dam)

DESIGN Julv 1992

WW CLEARANCES -huBL-

ENVIR CLEARANCES A t 1992

BIDS OPEN Indefinite

START CONSTRUCIION Indefinite

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Indefinite

CONSULTANT/PROJECI' MANAGER: PoSmeverLarry Carroll

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: None . ..

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Construction will be deferred until right-of-way issues can be resolved.

1 WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: n Meetings held with CCRFCD and Clark County to determine appropriate action. Continue work on design

plans. I WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Receive 90 percent plans from consultant and begin review. . _

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chand ler PHONE #: 565-2329 : - . .

C\WORDPERADATA\CCRFCDWPROJST form -psr 10/26/90 e,- :-' ('1 1 . b ~ ! 4 . i I



ENTITY City of Henderson DATE A w t 31. 1992

REVIEW PERIOD: FROM: Aurmst 1. 1992 TO: Aurmst 31. 1992

PROJECT: Sunset Detention Basin - Predesim and Land Acauisition .. .

DESCRIPTION: Predesinn of G52AF detentign basin. inlet. and outlet u a u i s i t i o n of needed rightqf-wav.

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 0 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1.385.000


DESIGN - WW CLEARANCES Setember. 1993

ENVIR CLEARANCES Undetermined

BIDS OPEN Undetermined

START CONSTRUCIlON Undetermined

. .. CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Undete rmined

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: None

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: None

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 1 None

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Interlocal Contract approved. Preparation of RFQ's c o m p l e t e d .

,WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Receive proposals and select a consultant.

PROJECT MANAGER: Saeed Ahmad PHONE #: 565-2432 C\WORDPtiRRDATA\CCDWROlST form -psr 10/26/90

RECEIVED

SEP 1992



ENTITY Citv of Henderson DATE Aurmst 31. 1992

REVIEW PERIOD: FROM:- 1. 1992 TO: t 31. 1992

PROJECT: UPRR Cbannel

DESCRIPTION: 1 Wash . . ..

PERCENT COMPLETE: 20 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2.300.000.00


DESIGN

WW CLEARANCES

ComDlete

COmDlete

ENVIR CLEARANCES ComDlete

BIDS OPEN ComDlete

START CONSTRUCTION June. 1992

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE December. 1992

CONSULTANT/PROJE& MANAGER: G. C. WALLAWCalvin Black

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACFBR: Max Riggs Construction

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler PHONE # 565-2329 M .Ct-,T c ;*=y -aEb,EL LQ,

C \ W O R D ~ A T A \ C C R F C D W l F P R O l ~ form -psr 10/26/90

SEP 2 1992 -41-

m O N U FLOOD CONTSOL DrSTlbacT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: City of North Las Veqas DATE PREP- 08/28/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 08/01/92 rn 08/31/92

PROJECT Gdwan Outfall Structure

DESCRI~TION. Construction of the outfall structure for the Gowan Road Detention Basin system

PERCENTC0"E: 2% ~ T E D c o 6 I O F P R O J E C P $ 11,576,000 construction , 000 eng. L a m .

12,729,000

DESIGN

WWCLEARANCES

ENvIRcLEKRANcEs

Complete

Complete

Complete

BIDS OPEN Complete

April 1991 START WNSTRUClTON

C0NSTRUC"ION COMPLETE lgg2

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

m u m o N PRIME mmR Las Vegas Pavinq Corporation

DELKYS OR PROBLEM AREAR

WORKC0MPL€TED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

Construction substantially completed.

PROJECT MANAGER: h v r - r.i 1 r,l lnln - PHONE #* a .

-42-


Finalize project.

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISIBICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

City of North Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 08/28/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 08/01/92 m 08/31/92

PRojEm Western Tributary to the Las Vegas Wash

DESCRI~TION. Lined channel between Commerce Street and Lone Mountain Road, and channel entrance protection-AKA Stimson Channe:

P&RcENTooMpLfiE: 2 5 % ~ T E D c o 6 I O F P R O J € c r : $ 580,000

EHEDW mR W " X W (-1

DESIGN Complete

WWCLEARANCES N/A

ENvIRcuxRANcEs N/A

BIDS OPEN Complete

START CONSTRUCIION August 1992

= ~ U ~ O N October 1992

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

~ ~ U ~ O N PRIME a m R Las Veaas Pavinq Cornoration

DELKYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

-Difficulties in coordination of plans prepared by two different designers and conflict in interpretation of plan details. -Newly discovered ground fissures

W 0 R K ~ " E D DURING CURRENT MON"

No construction work performed.

WORKTO BE COMPLETED DURING NDLT MONTH: . ..

Reconcile all outstanding conflicts, if any. Re-start construction work. Due to difficulty in reconciling issues and ground f issures,project may fall behind schedule up to 4 wks.

PROJECT MANA- PHONE X . - c;

-43-

= O W FLOOD CONTROb DBTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITE City of North Las Veqas DATE P m m 08/28/92

RFVLEW PERIOD FROM: 08/01/92 To: 08/31/92

PFt0JEm- Kyle Canyon Detention Basin

DESCRI~TION. Desiqn and prepare plans and specifications for detention basin and collection dikes

AMCIN September 1992

WWCLEARAN- November 1992

CLEARANCES November 1992

Blos OPEN September 1993

START CONSTRUCTION November 1993

November 1994

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

CONSTRUCI'ION PRIME CO-R N/A

DELXYSORPROBLEMAREAS:

Possible problem with lO-year old Indian claim on small portion of project.


-Completed basin configuration, geotechnical report and outlet structure design. -Completed 70% plan preparation. Project is on schedule.

WORKTO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

Submit 90% plans for review.

= O m a O O D CONTROb DBTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Citv of North Las Veqas DATE PREPARED: 08/28/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 08/01/92 To: 08/31/92

PRO= Umer Las Veqas Wash Detention Basin

DESCRI~TION. Construct detention basin and associated facilities in the vicinity of Floyd Lamb State Park

DMGN May 1991

WW-CES November 1991

ENvIRaEmmcEs November 1991

BIDS OPEN March 1992

START CQNSTRUCITON May 1992

CONSTRUCTION^ lgg3

CONSULTANT/PROIECT MRNKGP. Black and Veatch/City of North Las Vegas

~ ~ J S T R U ~ O N p m CONTRACTOR. Granite Construction Company

DEWPS OR PROBLEM AREAS

-Continued damage to tortoise fence by recreation vehicles, daily.

WORK D W G CURRENT MONTH: -85% R.C.B. culvert. -60% complete with pre-wet operation. -60% complete crushing and screening operation for R.C.C. face protection. -70% complete with south leg of dam. -Project is on schedule.

W O R K T O B E C O M P ~ D U R I N G W E X T ~ ~ : -90% complete pre-wet operation. -80% complete crushing and screening operation for R.C.C. face protection. -50% complete spillway construction. -40% complete all dam embankment earthwork. -Begin interception channel and berm.

PROJECT MANAGER: Rv- C i l C l l n r n .. PHONE #* - 6 . I

-45-

~ O N A S J PLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTrIY Citv of North Las Veaas DATE PREP- 08/28/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 08/01/92 To: 08/31/92

PROJECT- West Ranqe Wash Diversion Dike

DEscRIpTIoN. Design and prepare plans and specifications for 5-1/2 mile long dike and appurtenances

PERCENT CO- 9 8 % -TED COST OFPROJEC'P $ 350,000 design phase

SCHEDW FOR W"I0N (-1

DMGN

ww-- ENviRcLEnRuNcEs

Completed

August 1992

June 1992

BIDS OPEN October 1992

START WNSTRUCTION December 1992

CONSTRUCTION COMPLEI'E AuCIUst lgg3

CONSULTANT/PROJE~ MANAGFR Bovle Enqineerinq/City of North Las VegaS

WNSTRUCI'ION PRIME CONTRACTOR

DEIXYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

BLM staff hesitates to issue a lease/permit until resolution of outstanding mining claim.

WORKcoMpLfiEDDURINC CURRENT MONTH:

Attemptedto obtainmining claim relinquishment from Southern Nevada Paving Co.

Obtain relinquishment.



PERCENT COHPLETE: a EST-TED COST OF PROJECT:

SClHsDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )

DESIGN

S70.000.00

R/W CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJZCT MIWAGER: BOYLE ENG. CO,

CONSTRUCTION PR- CONTRACTOR:

MORK COMPJaETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONCLUDED GATHERING OF INFORMATION FOR FEMA TELE-CONFERENCE MEETING.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: HOLD FEMA TELE-CONFERENCE MEETING.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707

-47-


ENTITY: Ci tv of Las b a a s DATE PREPARED: 0813 1192

REMEW PERIOD FROM : 07131192 TO: 07131192

PROJECT: Gowan North Channel (Phase ll Project) DESCRIPTION: Channel to InterceDt and Convev Rows from the Northwest hto the

Gowan North Detention Basin PERCENT COMPLETE: 99 K ESTlMATED COST OF PROJECT $7,490,000

PRE-DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:

(lhtesl

PRE-DESIGN Essentialhr Comdete R/W CLEARANCE Unknown ENVlR CLEARANCES Unknown BIDS OPEN M 97198 CONSTRUCTION START DATE FY 97198

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE M 97/98

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: Church Enaineerina ITdd Kenner. PE

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREA

Master Plan Amendment is planned.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: (fbdesign Phase)

Refinements to the right-of-way drawings to reflect the Kem River gas line a


PROJECT MANAGER: Randv Fultz, PE PHONE #: 229-6276

~ A T A & W M S T A T U S '-48- . ._ .- - ~ T - 1 - T ' - T '

- -̂ I



ENTITY City of Henderson DATE A w s t 31. 1992-

REVIEW PERIOD: F R 0 M : a s t 1. 1992 TO: Aurmst 3 1. 1992

PROJECI‘: Pittman Wash Channel Phase II

DESCRIPTION: Concrete l i n e d channel amroximatelv 1 mile lone with a caoacitv of 10.600 ds. Extends from Sunset to Santiago.

PERCENT COMPLETE: . 98 R; ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $~OO.OOO

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: ( d m )

DESIGN COmDleted

WW CLEARANCES OrnDleted

ENVIR CLEARANCES QgQpleted

BIDS OPEN OmDleted

START CONSTRUCTION COmDleted

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE June. 1992

CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: Black and Veatch/Steve Roberts

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: Frehner Construction . ...

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: II None.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Project essentially completed.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Walkthrough of the Project with CCRFCD staf f

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler PHONE # 565-2329 2 ”

C \ W O R D ~ A T A \ C C R F C D ~ O l S T . .

form -psr 10/26/9b

$213 2 *\::;

-49-

. - . .


Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROl DISTRICT Date Prepared: 09/02/92

Review Period From: 08/17/92 To 08/31 /a

PROJECT aDa Vallev Master Plan Udate

DESCRIPTION: perform a Master Plan UDdate of the MoaDa Vallev which includes the communities of

MoaDa. Gle-ndale w o n .

PERCENT COMPLETE: 2 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: 3 120.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) Mav 1993

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: Jam es M. Montaomerv Consultina Enaineers Inc. / Lonnie Rov. P.E.


None.


Issued Notice to Proceed on August 13, 1992, began reconnaissance


Complete reconnaissance, review previous reports and plans and begin hydrologic analysis

PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. I t . P.E. PHONE #: 455-3139

-50-

-


Entity: EGIONAI FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 09/02/92

Review Period From: 07/13/92 To 08/31/92

PROJECT: ; i i - - i i '

DESCRIPTION: Produce a centerline alionment. I r" mtlons. rinht-of-wav mam and BLM rioht-of-wav

for the U. S. Armv of Erlpineers TroDiEgna/Flaminoo m e s Proiea

no0 Wash Detention Basin

PERCENT COMPLETE: 20 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: 3 157,000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) March 1993

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: E. C. W a Inc. f Calvin Black. P.E.



Finalize reconnaissance, perform record of survey


Develop alternative alignments.

PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. II. P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39

-51-


Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date P r e p a r e d : 0 9 / 0 2 / 9 2

Review Period From: 07/13/92 To 0813 1 I92

PROJECT -Dicana/Flaminoo Washes (AREA 2) Rioht-of-Wav AcauiSition Plan

DESCRIPTION: B e a centerline alionment. lgpal descrio- rioht-of-way and BLM rioht-of-way

gpplications for the U. S. A n v (;qtps of Emeers TroDiw/Flaminoo Washes Project

-erallv uDstream from the D r w e d TroDicana Wash Detention Basin excludinp Area 1.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 20 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 150,960

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) March 1993

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Church Fnaineerino of Nevada. Inc. / Todd Kenner. P F.


None.


Completed reconnaissance, began development of alignment alternatives


Develop alternative alignments.

PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. II. P.F PHONE #: 455-31 39

-52-


Entity: PFGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 09 / 01 / 92

Review Period From: 04 / 15 / 92 To 09 / 01 / 92

PROJECT: ; i n I

DESCRIPTION: Flood Insurance Rate MaD DreDaration for the Trodcana Wash to the confluence with the Flaminoo Wash. Base Flood Elevation determination for north. -rat and southern branchemmlmDroxiW

umits determined for minor tributaries.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 75 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 213.600

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: 01 / 15 / 93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CH2M Hill / Ted Davis. P.E.

DELAYS FOR PROBLEM AREAS:

Project is on schedule. Special Problem Reports were filed with FEMA regarding discrepancies between break-out flow rates at the U.P.R.R and at 1-1 5 presented in the F.I.S. Hydrology report and flow rates determined by the study contractor by detailed hydraulic methods. Solutions have been reviewed and accepted by FEMA's review contractor.


Data collection and field reconnaissance have been completed. Supplemental hydrology has been completed and submitted to FEMA. Topographic mapping and ground control have been completed. Approximate method flood plain delineation has been completed. Detailed hydraulic model was digitized and preliminary runs completed..

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ~~ ~

I Detailed hydraulic model to be completed and submitted to the District for review. Floodways to be determined. Work maps to be drafted. Stream profiles to be prepared.

PROJECT MANAGER: KEVIN EUBANKS. P.E. PHONE t: 455-31 39

-53-


ENTITY: Reqional Flood ControlDATE PREPARED: September 1, 1992 District

PROJECT : FLOOD AWARENESS AND SAFETY

DESCRIPTION:

PERCENT COMPLETE: 90% * .ICSTIHATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 150,000 (COnSUltant on-going fo r staff

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (date8 )

DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

START CONSTRUCTION


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Merica, Burch & Dickerson

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: -


None


See attached


See attached

PROJECT MANAGER: Cathy Razor PHONE # x 455-3139 -54- form -per 10/26/90

FLOOD AWARENESS & SAFETY STATUS WORK ACCOMPLISHED DURING AUGUST,1992

Billboards Three messages are being used. DONREY showed 24 boards in August for - c- a 75% saturation level. In Septet 16 billboards will be placed for a 50% showing. Work is being performed by MBD with Donrey as a subcontractor.

v On rainy days, Review Journal newspapers are being will be wrapped in bags printed with a flood safety message. 160,OOO will be distributed on each rainy day. The bags were received in August and have beensince utilized. The bag printer had a delay in the shipment of the 2 million bags, originally scheduled for receipt in July. Work was accomplished by MBD and the Review Journal.

Red Rock Vlslto rs Center . . On Saturday, August 22, the District gave a presentation to children ages 6- 12 and parents at the Red Rock Recreation Center. Channel 5's Rusty the Fox made an appearance. The Bureau of Land Management and Fox 5 produced several press releases for the event.

Fox 5 Kids Club "Info-mercials" run 12 times per week through the six-month period of April-September. Rusty the Fox has been available for several of the visits to children. Fox 5 placed our flood awareness message on the cover of the Spring and Autumn editions of the Kids Club Newsletter. RFCD staff has discovered, through the community and school visits, that the vast majority of the young children are familiar with the flood safety messages which are played on the Fox 5 Kids Club.

W ert Storms Can Be Breathtaking" VideQ Channel 10 broadcast the video to public schools over the closed circuit channel at and sf April and is planning another set of broadcasts in September. Channel IQ notifies the teachers about the broadcast through a flyer. RFCO sends letters to each principal asking for their cooperation. RFCD continues to respond to several requests for additional information and for additional copies of the tape. Work is coordinated by RFCD staff, School District and Channel 10.

lorlna Sheet RFCD continues to distribute these to children at public presentations.

us Veaas Sanitation BillingS We are now into our second printing (1 0 0 , O O O each) of a two sided bill stuffer (one side-artwork, second side-flood safety info). Sanitation

-55-

continues to use these flyers with their billings (about 10,000 per month). Assisted by Dennis Moyer, Tom McCaffrey, Mario Garcia and Frank Pearce @ City in obtaining this distribution. Arrangements were made by RFCD staff.

Countv Sanlt- . . They have agreed to use a bill stuffer in their quarterly billings. Arrangements were made by RFCD staff.

jake Mead Recreation Area In August, the rangers were given over 3,000 pieces of literature to be distributed at 11 recreation areas in the park. In addition, the RFCD flash flood video will be shown on a regular basis at the Alan Bible Visitors Center. Coordination was accomplished by RFCD staff and the National Park Rangers.

Brochures RFCD continues to distribute the brochures through a variety of methods.

Skv View Traffic This includes radio spots on Sky View Traffic (1 0-second public service announcements over 18 local radio stations, 2 am, 2 pm/ every other week for twenty-two weeks from mid-April to mid-September). Work by MBD staff with updates to Tom Hawley by RFCD staff.


I SUBJECT: FINANCIAL REPORTS

PETITIONER: VIRGINIA VALENTINE. P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER

I RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS

FISCAL IMPACT: None .

BACKGROUND: The following Financial Reports for the Month of July 1992. are submitted for your review:

Section DescriDtion Page0

A Fund 286: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-7 Fund Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Sales Tax Revenue Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Open Purchase Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ILA Approved . Not yet transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 3-4

Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 B Fund 330:

Fund Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 C Fund 443: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-28

Fund Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Monthly Expenditure Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-1 1 ILA Approved -.Not yet transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Project ExpenseIILA Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-19 Project Expense Summary ..................... 20-24 Work Maintenance Program Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-26 Projects List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27-28

D Fund 444: ............................... 29-34 Fund Balance Report .......................... 29 Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 30 Accounts Payable ............................ 31

Bond Projects Funding Status Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Project ExpenseDLA Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32-33

E Funding Request & Priorities Report/Sum . . . . . . . . . . . 35-39

Respectfully submitted.

. r. Dennis L . Johnson

lTEM # 5

Manager. Business & Finance

. . . . . .

FUND 286 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT JULY 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AB 494 Funds (Incl Cum Interest) Unused Tax Revenues

TOTAL BALANCE

REVENUES : Sales Tax Interest Earned Sale of Materials Other

TOTAL REVENUES

EXPENSES : Salaries & Benefits Supplies ti Services Professional Services Capital Expenditures Transfer to Fund 443

TOTAL EXPENSES

ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 286)

OBLIGATIONS AGAINST FUND BALANCE: P.O. Balances - Prof Serv and Operating Costs ILA's Approved-funds not yet transfered to Fund 443 ILA's Approved- funds not yet transfered back to Fund 286 Bond Fund 330 - Principal & Interest Accrual Accounts Payable

CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS

PROJECT SCOPE

TOTAL FUND OBLIGATIONS

FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR COMMITMENT

TOTAL REQUESTS FOR FUNDING

BALANCE FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\FUNDBAL

(59,518) (23,545)

(103 , 289) (599,865)

0

(1,459,655) (7,893,507)

(4,470,653) 228,877

(100)

FISCAL IMPACT

1 o f 3 9 . . - - - T -

SALES TAX REVENUE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

FISCAL YEAR 1992/1993

DIFFERENCE MONTH SALES 1/4 CENT SALES SALES TAX OVER/(UNDER) CUM REVENUE TAX RECEIVED TAX ESTIMATE REVENUES FROM ESTIMATE FY 92/93

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

1,919 , 727 ll88O,6OO

1,827,050

1,849,400

1,865,550

1,804,900

1,852 , 950 2,050,800

1,695,300

1,658,800

1,902,125

1,832,900

1,877,861 (41,866)

(1,880,600)

(1,827,050)

(1,849,400)

(1,865,550)

(1,804,900)

(1,852,950)

(2 , 050,800) (1,695,300)

(1,658,800)

(1,902,125)

(1,832,900)

~~ ~

1,877,861

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

, o

0

0

~~ ~~

TOTAL: 22 , 140,102 1,877,861 (20,262,241) 1,877,861

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\SALESTAX

2 o f 3 9

MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 MONTH ENDING JULY 1992

SALARIES & BENEFITS: JULY 92 RFCD EMPLOYEES JULY 92 RFCD EMPLOYEES

SUPPLIES & SERVICES:

06.23.92 06.23.92 07.23.92 06.30.92 07.08.92 06.29.92 06.29.92 06.29.92 07.15.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 06.30.92 07.08.92 07.21.92 06.30.92 06.30.92 07.15.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 07.23.92

HOLMAN ' S HOLMAN ' S CC TREASURER ABBOTT TROPHIES CC TREASURER TEACHERS REALTY CORP TEACHERS REALTY CORP TEACHERS REALTY CORP CC TREASURER CENTEL CENTEL CENTEL CELLULAR ATCT ADJUSTING ENTRY XEROX CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CC TREASURER RESCUE 3 INTERNATIONAL LV REVIEW JOURNAL PRO PROCESS PRO-PROCESS CC TREASURER CC TREASURER CC TREASURER

SALARIES BENEFITS

3550 3550 3550 3550 3550

24463 24463 24463

3550 3550 3550 3550 3550 3550

19037 3550 3550 3550 3550

25974 25974

3550 3550 3550

DEPT OF CONSERVATION & NAT 3550

5000 6000

TOTAL

7010 93818 7010 93959 7010 44109 7030 4398 7110 41848 7120 062992 7120 062992B 7120 0629923 7130 43512 7140 DIRECT BILL 7140 DIRECT BILL 7140 DIRECT BILL 7140 DIRECT BILL 7140 40247 7240 033864104 7250 468817256 7250 42971 7265 072192 7280 052592 7280 14632 7280 14660 7280 44106 7280 42999 7280 42995 7330 071592

45,060.78 14,457.68

59,518.46 --------------

06.10.92 85.45 06.17.92 100.40 07.21.92 11.35 06.29.92 117.50 07.06.92 280.50 06.29.92 7,462.77 06.29.92 160.00 06.29.92 7,822.77 07.09.92 643.00 07.15.92 1,157.94 07.15.92 98.52 07.15.92 124.51 07.15.92 254.27 07.15.92 (21.57) 07.09.92 265.12 06.24.92 30.75 07.01.92 510.14 07.21.92 150.00 05.25.92 105.40 06.25.92 10.00 07.01.92 .65.25 07.15.92 1,482.63 07.15.92 1,155.90 07.15.92 472.12 07.15.92 1,000.00 --------------

23,544.72


06.25.92 LANDISCOR 06.30.92 WILL & MUYS 06.30.92 DAMES & M O O R E 07.16.92 CC TREASURER 07.16.92 J M MONTGOMERY 07.23.92 DAMES & M O O R E

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:

NONE THIS PERIOD

TRANSFERS TO FUND 443: MWP-HEN92/93

33138 7210 7002 06.19.92 277.00 10136 7210 062392 06.23.92 1,709 38 76007 7210 001-06317 06.30.92 165.38 3550 7210 37034 07.06.92 35,000.00 16902 7210 NV1799 07.13.92 12,153.44 76007 7210 001-06402 07.17.92 53,984.13 --------------

103,289.33

MWP - HENDERSON FISCAL YEAR 92-93

TOTAL EXPENDITURES/TRANSFERS

599,865.00

762,672.79 lPIIPIPEEEIIIP

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\MNTHEXPS

4 o f 39

FUND 286 OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS JULY 1992

WILL & MUYS 7210 10136 JM MONTGOMERY 7210 16902 XEROX 7240 19037 SHOSHONA S 7210 21736 TEACHER'S REALTY 7120 24463 NEVADA PHOTO 7280 28303 MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON 7210 29184 CIS DAMES & MOORE CH2M HILL TEACHERS REALTY MERCURY BLUEPRINT HANDAR SEARS AHERN RENTERS AC HOUSTON LUMBER TEACHERS REALTY PRO-PROCESS DIGITAL EQUIP CO KAVOURAS, INC HANDAR, INC AVNET COMPUTER U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY G.C. WALLACE, INC CHURCH ENGINEERING CENTEL CELLULAR RALPH JONES DISPLAY MICROSOFT CORP VALCOM VALCOM VALCOM

7210 7210 7210 7120 7280 7240 7060 7120 7030 7120 7030 7240

804017330 8040 8040 7210 7210 7210 7060 7010 7060 8040 7060 8040

31539 76007 33280 41566 33483 34113 34301 34270 34277 34367 34563 34720 35043 35047 34726

PR43753 35530 35531 35463 35541 35499 35449 35142 35496

SARRETT OFFICE FURNITURE 8040 35412 XEROX 7240 35697 HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA 7010 35758 DESERT DECOR 7010 35759 ORACLE CORP 7330 35619

20,000.00 240,000.00 5,241.60 1,500.00 80,964.78

300.00 1501000.00 8, 595.00

744,846.00 270,400.00 92,739.48 2,000.00 3 000.00 250.00 750.00 500.00

93,939.48 750.00 292.00

18,175.00 52 , 834.00 41,067.31 112,500.00 157,000.00 150,960.00

30.00 130.00 297.00 990.81 15.50 353.46 457.00

5,000.00 100.00 400.00

3,135.00

16,543.20 220,109.48 3,059.65 970.00

76, 467.70 265.84

80,401.79 900.00

401,141.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3,456.80 19 , 890.52 2,181.95 530.00

4,497.08 34.16

69,598.21 7,695.00

343,704.86 270,400.00 92,739.48 2,000.00 3,000.00 250.00 750.00 500.00

93,939.48 750.00 292.00

18,175.00 52,834.00 41,067.31 112,500.00 157,000.00 150,960.00

30.00 130.00 297.00 990.81 15.50 353.46 457.00

5,000.00 100.00 400.00

3,135.00

2,259,513.42 799,858.80 1,459,654.62 XXXIIPIPIXP~tt

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\PO_BAL

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED TO FUND 443 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286

PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE

SCOPE FISCAL IMPACT

ILA'S APPROVED IN JUNE: CLA.03.C.90 4C 06.11.92 LAS.OS.D.92 5B 06.11.92 BOU.Ol.A.87 6 06.11.92 LAS92-93 9 06.11.92

ILA'S APPROVED IN JULY: LAS.04.B.90 5 07.09.92 HEN.05.A.92 7 07.09.92 LAS.OZ.D.92 8 07.09.92 LAS.lZ.A.92 9 07.09.92 LAS.03.B.89 10 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92

ILA'S APPROVED IN AUGUST: CLA.03.D.91 118 08.13.92 NLV.Ol.B.87 13 08.13.92 LAS.12.A.92 8C 08.13.92

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL ROW - 2ND SUPPL WASHINGTON AVE SANDHILL-VIRGIL (CONST) HEMENWAY WASH 6TH SUPPL MAINT WORK PROGRAM - CITY OF LAS VEGAS

275,000 2,437,000

150,000 588,000

3,450,000 ------------

OAKEY BLVD DET & CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT 50,000 SUNSET DETENTION BASIN/COLLECTION SYS & OUTFALL 1,385,000 ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 (RAMPART STORM DESIGN) 65,000 BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN (DOE-WESTCLIFF) 93,000 GOWAN OUTFALL & CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT 26,000 MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - NORTH LAS VEGAS 50,880 MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - MESQUITE 46,022 MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - BOULDER CITY 85,800 MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - CLARK COUNTY 973,835 MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - HENDERSON 453,170 ----------

3,228, I >

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL DESIGN LAS VEGAS WASH CRAIG-CIVIC CENTER ALTA STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION

TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED BACK TO FUND 286 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286

PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE

SCOPE

200,000 60,000

. 954,800

7,893,507 llDDPIP%IIPI

FISCAL IMPACT

HEN.02.A.89 23 08.13.92 GREEN VALLEY PARKWAY BRIDGE BOU.OZ.A.88 23 -08.13.92 GEORGIA CHANNEL CLA.04.B.89 23 08.13.92 FLAMINGO WASH AT ARVILLE CLA90-91 23 08.13.92 CLARK COUNTY MAINT WORK PLAN FY90-91

152,486

25,181 41,799

9,410

TOTAL TRANSFERS BACK TO FUND 286 228,876

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\ILA_PEND

6 of 39

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FOR JULY 92 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286

PROCESS VENDOR P . 0 . PROJECT #/ DATE NAME NUMBER EXP CLASS ..........................................................

07.22.92 AC HOUSTON LUMBER 34277 7030 07.23.92 FEDERAL EXPRESS 3550 7250 07.23.92 FEDERAL EXPRESS 3550 7250 07.22.92 MERCURY BLUEPRINT 33483 7280 07.22.92 MERCURY BLUEPRINT 33483 7280

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\ACCPAY

INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER DATE AMOUNT

001-432516 07.17.92 11.60 470823246 07.15.92 24.50 470207600 07.09.92 48.00 10732-104 07.14.92 3.00 9631-450 07.20.92 13.00 -----------

100. lo =PtaX==IP==

FUND 330 FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT JULY 31, 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE

REVENUES : INTEREST INCOME

EXPENSES : NONE THIS PERIOD


FILE: FINRPTS\FUND33O\FUNDBAL

8 of 39 . . - - _ - . -

36,153

260

260

0

FUND 443 FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT JULY 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 24,929,403

REVENUES : TRANSFER IN FROM FUND 286 RETURN OF FUNDS TO FUND 286

599,865

EXPENSES : 9999 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3560 - MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM (2,565,283)

(111,813) ------------ (2,677,096)


COMMITTED IMPACTS TO FUND BALANCE: ILA'e APPROVED IN JUNE ILA'e APPROVED IN JULY ILA'e APPROVED IN AUGUST ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

7,891,016 TOTAL COMMITMENTS

PROJECT CLOSE-OUTS - TRANSFER OF FUNDS BACK TO FUND 286: GREEN VALLEY PARKWAY BRIDGE (152,486) GEORGIA AVENUE CHANNEL (9,4101 FLAMINGO WASH BRIDGE AT ARVILLE (25,181) MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM - CLARK COUNTY FY90/91 (41,799) ------------

TOTAL TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO FUND 286 (228,877)

COMMITTED FUND BALANCE (FUND 443)

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\FUNDBAL

9 of 3 9


FUND PROCESS VENDOR x DATE NAME

P.0. PROJECT C INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER EXP CLASS NUMBER DATE AMOUNT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

443 07.07.92 443 06.30.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.15.92 443 06.25.92 443 06.30.92 443 06.30.92 443 06.30.92 443 07.15.92 443 06.30.92 443 07.15.92 443 07.15.92 443 07.15.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.15.92 443 06.30.92 443 06.30.92 443 06.30.92 443 06.25.92 443 06.30.92 443 07.13.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.08.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.25.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.08.92 443 07.08.92 443 07.08.92 443 06.25.92

MAX RIGGS CC TREASURER THE MARK GROUP BLACK & VEATCH BLACK & VEATCH CC TREASURER CC TREASURER CC TREASURER G.C. WALLACE CC TREASURER DELTA ENGINEERING JM MONTGOMERY JM MONTGOMERY PENTACORE ENG SEA INCORP CC TREASURER MAX RIGGS CONST CC TREASURER BOYLE ENG CC TREASURER CITY OF HENDERSON POGGEMEYER POGGEMEYER CITY OF HENDERSON CITY OF HENDERSON CITY OF HENDERSON CITY OF HENDERSON GC WALLACE GC WALLACE CITY OF HENDERSON VTN NEVADA VTN NEVADA CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS

28874 BOU01A87 6 13950 BUNOlA90 40952 12900 BUN01A90 2312 65832 CLA01A87 37339 65832 CLA01A87 036021 12391 CLAO2D90 40949 28143 CLAO2E91 40955 28876 CLAO3B90 40950 28153 CLA03B90 8 28156 CLA03D91 40954 28145 CLA03D91 3598 30697 CLA03D91 NV1745 30697 CLA03D91 NV1771 28155 CLAO3D91 5 29354 CLA03D91 LV-18760 23856 CLA04C90 22635 CLA04C90 28875 CLA05A91 30698 CLA06A91 28883 CLA06A91 65831 HEN01A87 19837 HENOlA87 19837 HEN01A87 16821 HENOlC90 16821 HENOlC90

14 HEN03A91 14 HEN03A91

26077 HEN03A91 26077 HEN03A91 31270 HEN04A91 31268 HEN04A91 31268 HEN04A91 67139 LASO2A87

5 LAS02B91 5 LASO2891 5 LAS02B91 4 LAS02C91 4 LAS02C91

16819 LAS03B89 3 LAS03B89 3 LAS03B89 3 LAS03B89

16819 LAS03B89 3 LAS03B89

30081 LAS04C91 13505 LAS08A89

40951 9

40956 3

40953 13431 7155 7156

013499 013432 013429 013428 032092 052292 013433

3 2

8052 7895 8078 7977 8079 7896 8062 8067 7994 7964 8055 8055 8056 7978

06.26.92 06.23.92 05.17.92 06.22.92 06.09.92 06.23.92 06.23.92 06.23.92 06.24.92 06.23.92 06.30.92 04.30.92 06.26.92 06.10.92 06.23.92 06.23.92 06.24.92 06.23.92 06.11.92 06.23.92 06.25.92 06.15.92 06.15.92 07.08.92 06.25.92 06.25.92 06.25.92 03.20.92 05.22.92 06.25.92 07.01.92 06.01.92 06.25.92 05.14.92 07.09.92 06.18.92 07.09.92 05.14.92 06.30.92 06.30.92 06.22.92 06.05.92 06.25.92 06.25.92 06.25.91 06.18.92

733,355.86 454.97

5,750.00 116.45

1,692.08 140.46

4,241.93 2,046.49 13,442.74 2,959.86 3,720.80 14,886.09 33, 922.38 27,787.28 4,305.43 9,877.’ 22 , 362. 3,428.6cl 28,032.23

351.45 1,014.45

‘10,718.12 11,911.93 4,100.00 48,095.62 4,072.67 2,326.32 25,753.00 7,924.00 6,214.79

109,086.39 69,036.10

621.26 685.97

9,097.06 937.77 78.08 711.17 193.55

16,846.30 678,480.00 28,320.00

562.57 1,374.” 1,496. 1,258.b.

10 o f 39


FUND PROCESS VENDOR # DATE NAME

P.O. PROJECT # INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER EXP CLASS NUMBER DATE AMOUNT

443 07.14.92 443 06.25.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.15.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.08.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.30.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.25.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.30.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.14.92 443 07.14.92 443 06.30.92

CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF LAS VEGAS CH2M HILL CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO. LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO. LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS CC TREASURER

WORK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM EXPENDITURES

443 06.29.92 443 06.29.92 443 07.15.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.23.92 443 07.14.92

BOULDER CITY BOULDER CONSTRUCTION HELENA CHEMICAL CO CASHMAN EQUIPMENT CO VTN NEVADA VTN NEVADA CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS

CONTRACTOR RETENTION INTEREST PAYMENTS:

443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92 443 07.31.92

MAX RIGGS CONSTRUCTION MAX RIGGS CONSTRUCTION MAX RIGGS CONSTRUCTION MEADOW VALLEY CONSTRUC SUPERIOR GUNITE WHEELER CONSTRUCTION CONTRI CONSTRUCTION LAS VEGAS PAVING

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\MNEXPRPT

13505 LAS08A89 13505 LAS08A91 19839 LAS09A89 29349 LAS09B91 29349 LAS09B91 30080 LASlOA91 30080 LASlOA91 7548 MESOlB89 14553 NLV01B87 14553 NLV01B87 23137 NLV03C91 23137 NLVO3C91 3213 NLV04A89 3213 NLV04A89 26070 NLV06A91 26070 NLV06A91 74274 SEA01A88

08063 7974 7979 8065 7980 8054

08068 204726 AR2 180 AR2143 AR2173 -2159 AR2175 AR2167 -2168 AR2170 40948

06.30.92 06.12.92 06.18.92 06.30.92 06.18.92 06.25.92 06.30.92 04.24.92 07.10.92 06.17.92 07.09.92 06.23.92 07.09.92 07.18.92 07.18.92 07.09.92 06.23.92

51,680.08 369,031.25

1,216.01 36,811.04

361.21 24,027.38 15,038.68 2,740.03 1,283.47 905.36 409.94

11,866.62 2,304.37 11,012.50 63,103.96 1,400.61

81.90

2,547,066.64 --------------

22919 BOU91-92 30078 CLA90-91 30007 CLA91-92

28 HEN91-92 26 HEN91-92 26 HEN91-92

28880 LAS91-92 28144 NLV91-92

9999 9999 9999 9999 9999 9999 9999 9999

2 06.22.92 19,647.93 RET REL 06.12.92 30,686.83 408147 06.19.92 3,530.40 JUNE92 07.14.92 16,615.00

2 07.01.92 3,738.86 1 06.01.92 3,253.79

8097 07.14.92 25,062.32 AR2166 07.07.92 9,278.00

111,813.13 --------------

8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606 8050 CJP606

07.31.92 280.65 07.31.92 932.63 07.31.92 657.53 07.31.92 503.27 07.31.92 2,706.79 07.31.92 4,025.86 07.31.92 514.52 07.31.92 8,594.95

18,216.20 --------------

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,677,095.97 I~~XIIIIIXXIIP

11 of 3 9 -

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - FUND 443 JULY 1992

ILA'S APPROVED IN JUNE: CLA.03.C.90 4C 06.11.92 LAS.09.D.92 5B 06.11.92 BOU.Ol.A.87 6 06.11.92 LAS92-93 9 06.11.92

ILA'S APPROVED IN JULY:

HEN.05.A.92 7 07.09.92 LAS.OZ.D.92 8 07.09.92 LAS.12.A.92 9 07.09.92 LAS.03.B.89 10 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92 MWP FY92/93 12 07.09.92

LAS.04.B.90 5 07.09.92

ILA'S APPROVED IN AUGUST: CLA.03.D.91 llB 08.13.92 NLV.Ol.B.87 13 08.13.92 LAS.12.A.92 8C 08.13.92

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL ROW - 2ND SUPPL 275,000 WASHINGTON AVE SANDHILL-VIRGIL (CONST) 2,437,000 HEMENWAY WASH 6TH SUPPL 150,000 MAINT WORK PROGRAM - CITY OF LAS VEGAS 588,000

3,450,000 -----------

OAKEY BLVD DET C CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT 50,000 SUNSET DETENTION BASIN/COLLECTION SYS & OUTFALL 1,385,000 ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 (RAMPART STORM DESIGN) BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN (DOE-WESTCLIFF) GOWAN OUTFALL 61 CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - NORTH LAS VEGAS MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - MESQUITE MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - BOULDER CITY MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - CLARK COUNTY MAINT WORK PROGRAM FY 92-93 - HENDERSON

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL DESIGN LAS VEGAS WASH CRAIG-CIVIC CENTER ALTA STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION

65,000 93,000 26,000 50,880 46,022 85,800 973,835 453,170 ----------

3,228,70'

200,000 60,000

954,800

1,214,800 --i--------

TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443 7,893,507 OtPIIPIIrPt

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED BACK TO FUND 286 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286

PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD SCOPE NUMBER

FISCAL ITEM APPRVL DATE IMPACT ...........................................................................................

HEN.OZ.A.89 23 08.13.92 GREEN VALLEY PARKWAY BRIDGE 152,486 BOU.OZ.A.88 23 08.13.92 GEORGIA CHANNEL 9,410 CLA.04.B.89 23 08.13.92 FLAMINGO WASH AT ARVILLE CLA90-91

25,181 23 08.33.92 CLARK COUNTY MAINT WORK PLAN FY90-91 41,799

TOTAL TRANSFERS BACK TO FUND 286 228,876 ----------- IPlltll=DIt

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\1LA_PEND

1 2 of 3 9


PROCESS DATE

VENDOR P . 0 . PROJECT INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NAME NUMBER t NUMBER DATE AMOUNT

07.15.92 07.15.92 07.15.92 07.15.92 07.15.92

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\ACCPAY

32241 XWP-CLA 4449-4 06.10.92 970.65 32241 XWP-CLA 5410-5 06.26.92 15.56 32241 MWP-CLA 5277-8 06.25.92 271.01 32241 MWP-CLA 5372-7 06.26.92 946.08 32241 MWP-CLA 6958 06.30.92 287.60 --------------

2,490.90 aPIPllatPtPIPt

13 of 39

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOUL AGREEMENT BALANCE REWRT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRlCT

CLA.Ol.A.87 Upper Flamingo Wash 7,713,000.00 668,155.00 Detention Basin 58.000.01 8 Outfal l

CLA.OZ.D.90 Rawhide Channel Eastern t o Topaz

121499.00 2; 000.00 1,212,536.30

406,?32.45 157,984.00

427.500.00

1,265,000.00 93,150.00

907,322.80 77,000.00

1,077,472.80 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

CLA.OZ.E.91 Rawhide Channel M c L d t o Mtn. Vista

180,000.00 65,000. 00 610.00

65,610.00 ----- - - - - - - - - - - -

CLA.03.B.90 Van Buskirk Channel

Outfal l

CLA.03.C.90 Van Buskirk Channel Right-of-way

CLA.03.D.91 Van Buskirk System

Rochelle t o Twain Spencer t o Rochelle

3,760,000.00 80,141 -25 49,293.00 18,000.00

151,081.00 277.44

3,011,832.00

3,310,624.69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3.575,000.00 . ------ 10,850.00

130,505.20

1.253.878.50 1,115,000.00

650,000.00 15,000.00

50.000.00 77,250.00

Black 8 Veatch C.C. Treasurer Timothy Morse National T i t l e Stewart T i t l e

Nevade T i t l e Lauyers T i t l e

Uheeler Const. Clerk of C o u r t

G.C. Wallace Clark County Meed.Vly. Con.

Clark County Sui f t

Clark County Clark County Converse Cons. Suift Blprtg. G.C. Wallace Contri Const.

Clark Comty K.E. Lent, Stewart T i t l e Clerk of Court Land T i t l e o f NV Nevade T i t l e

Clark County Delta Engineering MEA

1,808.53 650,168.93 17,986.07 0.00 35,345.16 22,654.85 0.00 12,499.00 0.00

0.00 2,000.00

0.00 1,212,536.30 0.00

0.00 157,984.00 0.00 0.00

0 .oo 0.00

406,732.45 427,500.00

0.00

0.00 4,078,476.85 0.00

66,472.15

6,983,242.69 107,113.07 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

0.00 140.46

0.00

4,241.93 0.00

2,046.49 0.00

0.00

13,442.74 0.00

0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3,720.80 2,959.86

0.00

85,493.05 7,656.95 65,660.10

849,092.18 58,230.62 11,339.90

17,264.119 47,135.11 234.00 375.10

46,631 -84 80,111.25 P.O. CLOSED OUT

2,661.16 18,000.00

271.44 0.00 0.00

86,422.22 64,658.18 2,922,836.51 88,995.49

13,746.83 1,253.17 10.a50.00 0.00 .------ ._._

130,505.20 0.00 1,115,000.00 0.00 1,253,878.50 0.00

632,321 .OO 0.00

39.666.80 5,463.88 9,536.12

37,583.20 34,434.42 15,565.58

1 4 o t ...J

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPQRT

CLARK CUJNTY REGIONAL FLOOD COWTROL DISTRICT FUND 443

Pentacore

SEA JM Montgomery

S w i f t

27,787.28 48,808.47 4,305.43

0.00

0.00

0.00

22,362.65 0.00

9,877.36 0.00

3,428.60 0.00

28,032.23 351.45

5,750.00 0.00

454.97 0 .00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

85,309.46 55.000.14 170,999.86

13,190.54

140,905.97 171 .00

L Upstrean Section 226.000.00 98,500.00

i75i265.00 171 -00

34 359.03 0.00

Tab Contractors 0.00 61,906.00 CLA.04.A.89 Flamingo Uash Bridge at Eastern Avenue

61,900.00 61,900.00

CLA.04.C.90 Flamingo Uash Bridges a t Paradise L Palm Verde

1,702,000.00 186.82

1,345,638.15 216,620.00

80,000.00 55,672.50

1,698,117.47

145,000.00 139,860.00 5,140.00

145,000.00

480,000.00 31,000.00 449,000.00

480,000.00

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Clark County MEA Max Riggs

Donrey Outdoor Adv Clark C m t y

193,182.74 186.82

1.294.129.34

0-00 23.437126 51,508.81 54.585.26 25i414.74

55,672.50 0.00

CLA.05.A.91 Duck Creek Bridge? Clark County Hefner Eng 33,523.61

3,570.13 106,336.39 1,569.87

Taniyasu L Pachuca

Detention Basin Fac i l i t ies

CLA.06.A.91 Range Uash 60,871.02

1,874.W 388,122.98 29,126.00 Clark County

Boylc Eng

OUTLYING AREAS:

BUN.O1 A.90 Bmkcrvi l l c Ch-1 (aka UirwLnill Uash)

1w,250.w 9,400.00 7.029.42 129.50

33,750.00 0.00

2,970.58 0.00

541,000.00 143.000.00

10.000.00 9,400.00

The Mark Group Appraisal Serv. Clark County Legal Process Sew

GSP.Ol.A.86 Goodsprings Flood Control lnprwemmts

5,205.16 0.00 32,980.00

7,794.64 w,000.00 32.980.00 13,000.00 Clark County

G.C. Uallace

Clark County Review Journal Simons L i 6 Assoc Acquisition S c i m

13,879.06 106.W

314,174.07 21,600.00

120.94 0.00

8.883.86

LAU.0l.A.69 Laughlin Unnamed Uash

0 . 00, > I

i

1 5 o f 39 1

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REWRT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIWAL FLOOD COUTROL DISTRICT

LAU.02.A.89 Laughlin Hiko Springs

370,000.00 106.04 4,143.96 47,750.00 31a.ooo.00

R e v i e w Journal Clark County Simons, L i Boyle Engineers

0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

106.04 1,407.34

315,730.06 47,750.00

0.00 0.00

4,025.58 43.00 15a.5a.w

10,535.55

209,960.00 106.04

58,560.00 300.00

4,938.00 600.00

2,736.62 0.00

2,269.94 0.00

LAU.OZ.B.92

mM.Ol.B.89

mM.OZ.A.89

Laughlin Hiko Springs - Remap

Clark County Boyle Eng a.ooo.00

1,500.00

Moapa Valley Muddy River West Levee

200,000.00 10,000.00

180,000.00 43.00

Clark County Review Journal The Mark G r o y ,

5,974.42 0.00

21,416.91

Hoep. Valley Logan Wash (aka Bmson Wash)

Clark County

Danes 6 Moore Revieu Journal

Appraisal Serv. Clerk of the Court UPRR Nevada T i t l e Co.

29,398.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.oq

mM.02.B.92 Hoar# Valley-logan Wash (Construction)

Greiner, Inc. 0.00 0.00 23a,OOO.00

NEL.Ol.A.88

SEA.01 .A.=

Nelson Flood Control luprwcnmts

Control Inprovcnrnts Searchlight Flood

70,000.00 12,000.00 Clark County 0.00 2,961.95 9.03a.05

Clark County G.C. Wallace

a1 -90 7,452.35 14,847.65 0.00 0.00 35,500.00

CITY OF BOULDER CITY:

BOU.Ol.A.87 Hememay Wash 4,489,000.00 94'938.84 765.00

25,769.25 1~,33a.00

0.00 94,938.84 0.00 765 -00

0.00 0-00

J.H.Montgornery E.G. Radig Coe 6 Van Loo C/Boulder C i ty

....

0.00 177,227.59 9,110141 0.00 25,769.25 0.00

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOUL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443

C I T Y OF HENDERSON:

HEN.Ol.A.87 P i t - Uash Chamel 937,000.00 562,225.00

240,000.00 9,775.00

C/Henderson

Poggeyer T r a m p

1,014.45 285,479.78 0.00

276,745.22 9,775.00

22,630.05 0.00

200,501.46 39,498.54

HEN.Ol.C.90 P i t t m Uash Channel 3,000,000.00 142,471.00 2,729,375.00

125,154.00 3,000.00

C/Henderson

Black L Veatch Superior Gunite

Nevada Labor Ccan

52,195.62 90,820.77 51,650.23 0.00 2,303,130.60 426,244.40 0.00 120.054.63 5.099.37 0.00 3;000.00 0.00

33,677.00 w,050.00 6,398.99

0.00 6,398.99 18,601 -01

HEN.03.A.91

HEN.04.A.91

HEN.05.A.92

UPRR Channel 150,o0O.00 99,050.00 25.000.00

G.C. Uallace C/Henderson

178,122.49 6,214.19

202,424.26 6,214.m 53,785.21

337,575.74 C - 1 Chamel System C/Henderson

VTN Nevada

Sunset Det Basin/ Collection L Outfal l

0.00 0.00 0 .oo

C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS:

LAS.Ol.A.87 Angel Park Detention Basin Outflow Structure

400,300.00 45,432.15 354,867.85

G.C. Uallace C/Las Vegas

0.00 45,432.15 0.00 346,114.26

0.00 8,753.59

LAS.OZ.A.87 Buffalo Chamel (aka Angel Park/Gouan Detention Basin)

4,535,965.00 217,211.95 4,314,753.05

4,000.00

G.C. Uallace C/Las Vegas Kennedy/Jenks

0.00 212,211.95 621 -26 3,824,369.32

5,000.00 490,Uu.TJ

0.00 4,000.00 0.00

i

1 7 o f 39

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT

CLARK COUNTY REGIOllAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443

LAS.OZ.B.91 Buffalo C h m l Srnrrrlin t o Vegas Dr. (aka Angel Park/Gowan Detention Basin)

LAS.OZ.C.91 Buffalo Chamel Ves tc l i f f to Sunrrrlin

(aka Angel Park/Gouan Detention Basin)

LAS.02.D.92 Buffalo Chamcl Design Doc-Vestcliff

LAS.03.B.89 Gowan Detention Basins 8 Outfal l

LAS.04.B.90 Oakey Blvd. System

LAS.04.C.92 Oakey Blvd. System Decatur Crossing

LAS.08.A.89 Carey Avcnuc/Lakt Uead

LAS.09.A.89 Uashington Avcnuc

Detention & C o r n . System

System

LAS.09.B.91 Uashington Avenue System Ssndhill t o Bruce

LAS.W.D.92 Vashimton A v e System Construction

LAS.lO.A.91 Gowan Worth Channel

588,898.00 588,898.00 C/Las vegas

93,000.00 0.00

5,401,000.00 4,703,774.00 C/Las Vegas

694,040.00 Poggemeyer

5,397,814.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

562,000.00 471,665.00 Boyle Engr. 90,355.00 C/Las Vegas - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

562,000.00

35,000.00 35,000.00 C/Las Vegas

6,750,000.00 6,750,000.00 C/Las Vegas

542,000.00 292,000.00 M.E.A. 35,000.00 C/Las Vegas - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 327,000.00

471,000.00 471,000.00 C/Las Vegas

2,437,000.00 0.00

100,000.00 100,000.00 C/Las Vegas

1119.25 789.25 588,108.7s

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 668,726.00 725,776.65 805,768.43 3,898,005.57

25,314.00

0.00 464,121.6s 7,523.35 0.00 39,015.4s 51,339.55

1,496.90 35,000.00 CLOSE0

421,970.20 5,153,510.71 1,596,489.29

0.00 1,216.01

290,481.81 1,518.19 21,768.89 13,231.11

37,172.25 58,120.81 412,879.19

0.00 0.00 0.00

39,066.06 73,866.28 26,133.72

1 8 of

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

LAS.ll.A.92 Angel Park Peccole 1 Ranpart STorn Drain

C I T Y OF MESQUITE:

MES.Ol.B.89 T o m Wash Det. Basin

C I T Y OF NORTH LAS VEGAS:

NLV.Ol.B.87 L.V. Wash/Craig to Civ ic Ctr. (aka King Charles

NLV.03.A.M West Range Wash 4 Detention Basin

NLV.03.C.91 West Range Wash Diversion Dike

NLV.04.A.W Govan Detention Basins Outfall Structure

NLV.05.A.89 Upper L.V. Wash Detention Basin

NLV.06.A.91 Kyle Canyon Detention Basin

65,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2,740.03 0.00

592,785.13 30,875.00 19,125.00

17,214.87

2,380,600.00 645,088.00 C/N.Las Vegas 2,188.83 0.00 1.672.314.68

632,617.08 63.197.32 12,470.92

1,735,512.00 Max Riggs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . .

2,380,600.00

360,000.00 360,000 .OO C/N . Las Vegas 0.00 307,986.25 52,015.75

350,000.00 350,000.00 C/N.Las Vegas 12.276.56 162,792.7s 187,207.25

13,420,000.00 1,366,OOO.00 C/N.Las Vegas 13,316.87 11,685,198.00 LV Paving

13,051,198.00

968,094.54 0.00 10,941,763.29

397,905.46 743,434.71 _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - _

1,650,000.00 1,650,000.00 C/N;Las Vegas 0.00 1,545,142.56 54,1157.64

450,000.00 450,000.00 C/N.Las Veges 64,504.57 205,676.20 244,323.80

!

i 1 19 of 39

PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT

AMOUNT EXPIRATION DATE EXPENDED DATE REMAINING

CLARK COUNTY: CLA.Ol.A.87 U per Flamingo Wash

getention Basin SI Outfall

CLA.OZ.D.90 Rawhide Channel Eastern to Topaz

CLA.02.E.91 Rawhide Channel Mcleod to Mtn. Vista

Jul 9, 1987 Sept . 14, 1989 Dec. 13, 1990 Apr. 11, 1991

TOTAL

July 12, 1990 Oct. 11, 1990

TOTAL Oct. 10, 1991

440,000.00 July 31, 1992 6,983,242.69 729,757.31 2,081,000.00 5.819.000.00 i627;OOO.OO) ---------------

7,713,000.00

100,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991 1,000,245.33 264,754.67 1,165,000.00

1,265,000.00 ---------------

180,000.00 July 1, 1992 17 8 499 79 162,500.21

CLA.03.B.90 Van Buskirk Channel June 14, 1990 300,000.00 Apr. 17, 1992 38154,309.26 605,690.74 Outfall Aua. 8. 1991 3.460.000.00

CLA.03.C.90 Van Buskirk Channel Oct. 11, 1990 2,000,000.00 Jan. 31, 1992 3,156,301.53 418,698.47 Right-of-way Aug. 8, 1991 1,300,000.00

Jun 11, 1992 275,000.00 TOTAL 3,575,000.00

--------------- cLA.03.D.91 Van Buskirk Channel Se t. 12, 1991

Spencer to Rochelle Ocg. 10, 1991 Maryland at Reno; Tropicana at S ncer; Between Rochelc €4 Twain

CLA.04.A.89 Flamingo Waeh Bridge Sept. 14, 1989 at Eastern Avenue

CLA.04.C.90 Flamingo Waeh Brdge. July 12, 1990 at Paradise and July 12, 1990 Palos Verde Aprll 11, 1991

June 13, 1991 TOTAL

360,000.00 July 1, 1992 290,000.00 July 1, 1992

61,900.00 Dec. 31, 1990 0.00 61,900.00

750,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991 1,568,586.14 133,413.86 450,000.00 300,000.00 202,000.00 ---------------

1,702,000.00

CLA.05.A.91 Duck Creek Channel Sept. 12, 1991 100,000.00 Oct 1, 1992 37,093.74 107 , 906.26

PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

CLA.06.A.91 Ran e Wash Defent ion Basin Facilities

OUTLYING AREAS: BUN.Ol.A.90 Bunkerville Channel

(aka Windmill Wash)

GSP.Ol.A.88 Goodsprin s Flood Control Improvements

LAU.Ol.A.89 Laughlin 4 Unnamed Wash

LAU.02.A.89 Lau hlin Hi& springs

LAU.OZ.B.92 Laughlin Hrko Springs Remap

MOA.Ol.B.89 Moa a Valley Mugdy River West Levee

MOA.02.A.89 Moapa Valley 4 Lo an Wash

(aza Benson Wash)

4

MOA.02.B.92 Moapa Valle Logan Was): Constructlon

NEL.Ol.A.88 Nelson Flood Control I

April 09, 1992 45,000.00

145,000.00 ---------------

Nov. 14, 1991 480,000.00 July 1, 1992

April 11, 1991 June 14, 1990 250,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991

291,000.00 TOTAL 541,000.00

--------------- June 9, 1988 99,000.00 Dec. 31, 1989

Sept. 14, 1989 350,000.00 Dec. 31, 1990

Nov. 9, 1989 370,000.00 Dec. 31, 1990

Feb. 13, 1992 9,500.00 July 1, 1993

Hay 11, 1989 200,000.00 Dec. 31, 1990

June 13, 1991 Sept . 14, 1989 173,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991 Sept 12, 1991 90,000.00

77,000.00

TOTAL 340,000.00 ---------------

Feb. 13, 1992 4,216,000.00 July 1, 1993

July 14, 1988 70,000.00 Dec. 31, 1989

62,751.02 417,248.98

125,808.92 415,191.08

5,205.16 93,794.84

352,643.02 (2,643.02)

364,993.44 5,006.56

0.00 9,500.00

162,651.67 37,348.33

284,999.59 55,000.41

0.00 4,216,000.00

2,961.95 67,038.05 a

2 1 o f 39

PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443

SEA.Ol.A.88 Searchlight Flood

CITY OF BOULDER CITY: BOU.Ol.A.87 Hemenway Wash

Control Improvements

CITY OF HENDERSON: HEN.Ol.A.87 Pittman Wash Channel

HEN.Ol.C.90 Pittman Wash Channel

HEN.03.A.91 UPRR Channel

HEN.04.A.91 C-1 Channel System

HE1.05.A.92 Sunset Det Basin Collection 6i Outfala

Apr. 14, 1988 172,000.00 Dec. 31, 1989 7,452.35 164,547.65

Oct. 8, 1987 205,000.00 July 1, 1988 Sept. 13, 1990

2,130,381.48 2,358,618.52 70,000.00

Mar. 14, 1991 4,064,000.00 July 9, 1992 150,000.00

TOTAL 4,489,000.00 ---------------

Au a 13, 1987 522,000.00 March 31, 1992 495,756.24 441,243.76 Fe%. 14, 1991 315,000.00 Feb. 13, 1992 100,000.00

Sept. 13, 1990 3,000,000.00 Jan. 31, 1992 2,517,006.00 482,994.00

Sept. 12, 1991 150,000.00 July 1, 1992 105,448.99 44,551.01 Sept. 12, 1991 600,000.00 July 1, 1992 208,639.05 391,360.95 July 9, 1992 1,385,000.00 0.00 1,385,000.00

CITY OF LAS VEGAS:

LAS.Ol.A.87 Angel Park Detention July 9, 1987 2,700.00 Jan. 1, 1991 Basin Structure Jan. 12, 1989 147,300.00

July 13, 1989 250,300.00

391,546.41 8,753.59

- --------------- TOTAL 400,300.00

(aka Angel Park/Gowan Jan. 15 , 1989 1,672 , 700.00 Dec. 14, 1989 3,019,365.00

TOTAL , 4,535,965.00

LAS.02.A.87 Buffalo Channel July 9 1987 94,200.00 Jan. 1, 1991 4,040,581.27 495,383.73 Detentlon Basin) July 13, 1989 (250,300.00)

--------------- LAS.02.B.91 Buffalo Channel Sept. 12, 1991 110,000.00 Jan. 31, 1994 10,720.80 119,279.20

2 2 of d 9

6E 30 EZ

Y

00'000'LE0'Z 00'000'LE~'Z Z66'1 '6 ATnS 00 '0

'18'02'1 '8s

OL'OSZ'Z'1E

61'6L8'2TV

Of '60L'6ZZ

'16'0'60'SW

68'Y'60'SU'I I

I

6Z'680'96S*'1

a3sm

TL'O'1S'tST'S

00'000'SE

68'Y'80'Sll?

'16'3'00'SU'I

06'Z98'8S Ot'LE'1'EOS 06'0'00 SU'I

I

OO'SZ9'LS r66r 'or -730 OO'OOO'OOL'S i66j 'Sf aunr

00*000'0s9 00'000'SL 066T 'ET '7daS

686T '6 'AoN LS'SOS'9Z6'f

OO'OOO'E6

68'0'fO'Sm

z6'a'zo'sU'I

SL'80'1'88S SZ'68L K6'3'ZO'SU'I

PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443

PROJECT NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT

DATE AMOUNT EXPIRATION DATE EXPENDED REMAINING

System Construction

LAS.lO.A.91 G w a n North Channel LAS.ll.A.92 An el Park-Peccole 1

CITY OF mSQUITE:

MES.Ol.B.89 Town Wash Detention

&impart Storm Drain

Basin

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS: NLV.Ol.B.87 L.V. Wash/Craig to

Civic Center (aka King Charlee Diversion Channel)

NLV.03.A.88 West Range Wash Detention Basin

NLV.03.C.91 West Range Wash Diversion Dike

NLV.04.A.89 G w a n Detention Basins Outfall Structure

NLV.05.A.89 U per LV Wash getention Basin

NLV.06.A.91 K le Canyon getention Basin

Sept. 12, 1991 100,000.00 Jan. 31, 1992 73,866.28 26,133.72

July 9, 1992 65,000.00 0.00 65 , 000.00

July 13, 1989 480,000.00 Dec. 1, 1991 623,660.13 36,339.87 Mar. 14, 1991 180,000.00 Dec. 1, 1991

TOTAL 660,000.00 ---------------

Au 3, 1987 1,000,000.00 July 31, 1993 2,304,931.76 75,668.24 Jus, 14, 1988 no net chan e Sep . 14, 1989 500 , 000.80 June 14. 1990 880,600.00

Apr. 14, 1988 360,000.00 May 1, 1991 307,984.25 52,015.75

June 13, 1991 350,000.00 July 1, 1992 162,792.75 187,207.25

May 11, 1989 480,000.00 July 1, 1994 11,909,857.83 1,510,142.17 Mar. 14. 1991 (3.046.000.00) Nov 8 1990 15,986,000.00

Sept. 14, 1989 650,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991 1,595,142.36 54,857.64 Mar. 14. 1991 1,000,000.00 ---------------

TOTAL 1,650,000.00

Sept. 12, 1991 450,000.00 Dec. 31, 1992 205,676.20 244,323.80

WORK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FY 92-93 FUND 443 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

ENTITY AMOUNT ILA P.O.

NUMBER

Page 1 of 2 AS OF 08/14/92

P.O. CURRENT TOTAL AMOUNT EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE

ILA P.O.

CLARK COUNTY 973,835.00

LAS VEGAS 588,000.00

NORTH LAS VEGAS 50,880.00

HENDERSON 453,170.00

MESQUITE 46,021.50

BOULDER CITY 85 , 800.00

i TOTAL MWP

973,835.00

1 i

i

2 5 of 39

WORK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FY 91-92 FUND 443 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

ENTITY ILA P.O. P.O. CURRENT TOTAL P.O. ILA

AMOUNT EXPENDITURE EXPENDED AMOUNT NUMBER BALANCE BALANCE

Page 2 of 2 AS OF 08/14/92

CLARK COUNTY 525,000.00 30742 30007 30008 32242 32258 32241 22919

LAS VEGAS

NORTH LAS VEGAS

HENDERSON

75 14 9 6 3 2

314

-------- , 000.00 ,431.40 ,450.00 ,000.00 , 102.00 ,500.00 , 582.64

3,530.40 14,434.30 0.00 0.00 75,000.00 502,060.70 0.00 8.505.00 9 5 00 42:90) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

6,000.00 3,102.00

0.00 0.00 314,582.64

2 , 500.00

320,000.00 28880 320,000.00 25,062.32 25,062.32 294,937.68 294,937.68

54,985.00 28144 54,985.00 9,278.00 47,572.00 7,413.00 7,413.00

293,363.00 24 100 , 000.00 0 0.00 ioo,ooo.oo 293,363.00 25 26

126,440.00 0 0.00 126,440.00 27 16,000.00

7,000.00 6,992.65 0.00

0.00 7,000.00 0.00 16,000.00

28 20,000.00 16,615.00 0.00 20,000.00 -------------- 269,440.00

TOTAL MWP 1,332,778.20 1,903,427.28 81,126.30 138,326.08 1,070,595.16 1,194,452.12 PLIPPP=IPLPPI

TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS PERIOD 81,126.30 t=t===ttttt=

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\WMPFDEAI,

26 of . .

REGIONAL FLOOO COWTROL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS "PAY AS YOU GO" FUNDS (FUND 443) AS OF JUNE 1992

CLARK COUNTY: UPPER FLAMINGO UASH DETENTION BASIN a OUTFALL

RAUHIDE CHANNEL MCLEOD TO MTN. VISTA a PALM RAUHIDE CHANNEL EASTERN TO TOPAZ

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL OUTFALL (FLAMINGO RD-FLAMINGO UASH) VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-UAY (DET. S I T E E ) VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL SPENCER-ROCHELLE-TUAIN 0 UPSTREAM VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE I V IMPROVEMENTS FLAMINGO UASH BRIDGE AT EASTERN AVENUE FLAMINGO UASH BRIDGE AT ARVILLE FLAMINGO UASH BRIDGES AT PARADISE AN0 PALOS VERDE DUCK CREEK BRIDGES AT TOHIYASU P LA CASITA RANGE UASH DETENTION BASIN FACILITIES

OUTLYING AREAS: LAUGHLIN - UNNAMED UASH LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS REMAP BUNKERVILLE CHANNELCAM UlNDMlLL UASH) M A P A VALLEY - HUDOY RIVER UEST LEVEE WOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN UASH ( A M BENSON UASH) WOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN UASH CHANNEL GOOOSPRINGS FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS NELSON FLOOO CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS SEARCHLIGHT FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF HENDERSON: PITTUAN UASH CHANNEL (PHASE 111) PITTHAN UASH CHANNEL (CONSTRUCTION-PHASE I ) GREEN VALLEY PARKUAY BRIDGE UPRR CHANNEL C - 1 CHANNEL SYSTEM SUNSET DETENTION BASIWICOLLECTION SYSTEM a OUTFALL

CITY OF LAS VEGAS: ANGEL PARK DETENTION BASIN STRUCTURE ( C L W - 1 ) ANGEL PARK/GWAN COWVEYANCE (AKA BUFF CHNL C L W - 2 ) ANGEL PK/GOUAN D E I BSN(BUF CHL)SU"ERLIN-VEGAS OR ANGEL PK/GOUAN D E 1 BSN(BUF CHL)UESTCLlFF-SUUMERLIN BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN ( DOE-UESTCLIFF )

W A N OUTFALL AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OAKEY BLVD DETENTION 8 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OAKEY BLVD DETENTION P CONVEYANCE (DECATUR X- ING) CAREY AVENUE/LAKE HEAD D E 1 P CONVEYANCE SYSTEM

CLA.Ol.A.87 7,713,000 CLA.OZ.D.90 1,265,000 CLA.OZ.E.91 180,000 CLA.03.B.90 3,760,000 CLA.03.C.90 3,575,000 CLA.03.D.91 850,000 CLA.03.G.92 1,072,000 CLA.04.A.89 61,900 CLA.04.B.89 294,819 CLA.04.C.90 1,702,000 CLA.05.A.91 145,000 CLA.06.A.91 480,000 ----.---------

20,026,719

LAU.Ol.A.89 350,000 LAU.OZ.A.89 370,000 LAU.OZ.B.92 9,500 BUN.Ol.A.90 541,000 wOA.Ol.B.89 200,000 HOA.OZ.A.89 340,000 HOA.OZ.B.92 4,216,000 GSP.Ol.A.88 99,000 NEL.01.A.88 70,000 SEA.Ol.A.88 172,000 ----.-------.-

6,367,500

HEN.01 A.87 937, DO0 HEN.01.C.90 3,000,000 HEN.02.A.89 1,128,514 HEN.03.A.91 150,000 HEN.04.A.91 600,000 HEN.05.A.92 1,385,000 ------.----.--

LAS.01.A.87 LAS.OZ.A.87 LAS.02.B.91 LAS.OZ.C.91 LAS.OZ.D.92 LAS.03.B.89 LAS.04.B.90 LAS.04.C.91 LAS.08.A.89

7,200,514

400,300 4,535,965

130,000 588,898 93,000

5,401,000 562,000 35,000

6,7SO,OOO

REGIONAL FLOOO CONTROL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS "PAY AS YOU GO" FUNDS (FUND 443) AS OF JUNE 1992

PROJECT NAME __________________________I_____________-------------. UASHINGTON AVE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ( C L W - 9 ) UASHINGTON AM SYSTEM - SANDHILL TO BRUCE UASHINGTON AVE SYSTEM - CONSTRUCTION GOVAN NORTH CHANNEL ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 [RAMPART STORM DESIGN) ALTA STORM DRAIN CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO DR TO GOUAN S. D E 1 B A S I N

C I T Y OF MESOUITE: T W N UAStI DETENTION BASIN (DSG)

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS: L V UASH CRAIG-CIV IC CENTER(AKA K ING CHARLES D I V ) EAST RANGE UASH DETENTION BASIN VEST RANGE UASH DIVERSION DIKE GOVAN DETENTION BASINS OUTFALL (STIMSON EXTENSION) UPPER LAS VEGAS UASH DETENTION BASIN (DSND P ROW) KYLE CANYON DETENTION BASIN

BOULDER CITY: HEMENUAY UASH GEORGIA AVENUE CHANNEL

CURRENT I L A SUPPLEMENTS PROJECT # VALUE OR NEU I L A ' S

I - - _ - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

LAS.W.A.89 542,000 LAS.W.B.91 471,000 LAS.W.D.92 2,437,000 LAS.lO.A.91 100,000 LAS.l l .A.92 65,000 LAS.12.A.92 954,800 LAS.13.A.92 67,000 .-------------

23,065,963

NLV.Ol.B.87 NLV.03.A.88 NLV.03.C.91 NLV.04.A.89 NLV.05.A.89 NLV.06.A.91

2,380,600 360,000 350,000

13,420,000 1,650,000

450,000

18,610,600

BOU.Ol.A.87 4,489,000 160,000 BOU.0Z.A.88 613,590

- - * - - - - - - - - - - -

5,102,590

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\PROJECT

2 8 of 39

FUND 444 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT JULY 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE

REVENUES : 3550 - INTEREST EARNED 9999 - INTEREST EARNED

EXPENSES : EXPENSES IN MARCH


CURRENT OBLIGATIONS AGAINST BOND FUNDS

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BALANCE REMAINING ON PROJECT FUNDED TO DATE

UNOBLIGATED BOND FUNDS

CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS

ENTITY SCOPE

75,936,466

FISCAL IMPACT

BALANCE 28,604,580 llllPIIPPIPPP

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND444\FUNDBAL

2 9 of 39


07.23.92 CITY OF BOULDER CITY 07.08.92 COE & VAN LOO 07.15.92 KLEINFELDER 07.21.92 MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS 07.16.92 FREHNER CONSTRUCTION 07.13.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 07.08.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 06.25.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 06.25.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 07.15.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 07.23.92 CH2M HILL 06.30.92 CH2M HILL 06.30.92 CH2M HILL 06.30.92 CH2M HILL 06.30.92 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTING 06.25.92 CITY OF NO. LAS VEGAS 07.14.92 CITY OF NO LAS VEGAS 06.30.92 CITY OF NO. LAS VEGAS 07.21.92 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION

30696 28872

2 31052 28879

3 30079 29351 29351 29351 28870 28870 28870 28870 29034 30741 30741 30741 31267

BOU01A87 BOU01A87 CLA02F92 CLAO2F92 HENOlD91 HEN03B92 LAS03C91 LAso9c91 LAso9c91 LAso9c91 MES01A89 MES01B89 MES01B89 MESOlB89 MES01B89 NLV05B89 NLV05B91 NLV05B92 NLV05B92

5828 39320 314025

2 7

13430 8053 7993 7981 8066

206733 204736 204727 204728

7 AR2139

AR2176 AR2 160

2

02.04.92 06.15.92 06.12.92 05.27.92 07.13.92 06.25.92 06.25.91 06.22.92 06.18.92 06.30.92 06.15.92 05.22.92 04.24.92 04.30.92 06.24.92 06.12.92 07.09.92 06.25.92 07.08.92

28,188.91 19,836.55 6,045.00

209,564.10 372,123.80

181.15 5,228.67

336,379.70 2,733.48 26,865.95 57,872.08 69,449.21 17 , 606.54 103,734.23 417,138.68 3,806.10 1,278.38 16,604.29 132,652.ao -------------

1,827,289.62

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND444\MNTHEXPS


31 of 3 9

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTE-AL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 444 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

CLA.02.F.91 RAWHIDE CHANNEL 02.13.92 07.09.92

CLA.OJ.E.92 VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM 06.11.92 (ROCHELLE-MCCLOUD)

CLA.03.F.92 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL 07.09.92 (PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS)

BOULDER CITY :

1,391,000 03.31.93 594,485

218,287 1,767,198

921,800 07.01.93 0 921,800

1,627,000 07.01.93

BOU.Ol.A.87 Hemenway Wash 11.14.91 BOU.Ol.A.87 Hemenway Wash

1,327,000 12.01.92 02.13.92 (460,000) ---------------

HENDERSON : 867,000

0 1,627,000

668,999 198,001

HEN.Ol.D.91 Pittman Waah Chnl 11.14.91 2,520,000 07.31.92 1,792,862 727,138 HEN.03.B.91 UPRR Channel 03.12.92 2,600,000 01.31.93 181 2,599,819 LAS VEGAS:

Phase 11

LAS.03.C.91 Gowan Detention 11.14.91 10,900,000 03.31.94 25,452 10,874,548 Basin

LAS.04.D.92 Oakey Blvd Detention 05.09.92 9,519,200 11.01.94 Basm

0 9,519,200

LAS.09.C.91 Washington Ave. 11.14.91 1,700,000 07.01.94 System - Sandhill Outfall

527,332 1,172,668

MESQUITE: MES.Ol.B.89 Town Wash 11.14.91

Detention Basin 04.09.92 5,448,304 07.01.93 2,770,578 1,366,926 (1,310,800) 4,137,504

---------------

, a

PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 444 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT

GRAND

DATE AMOUNT EXPIRATION EXPENDED REMAINING TOTAL AMOUNT

NLV.OS.B.92 Up r Las Vegas Wash 01.09.92 12,900,000 07.30.93 Degntion Basin

192,255 8,757,745 (3,950,000)

OUTLYING AREAS :

7 7 I , ? 7f-l

BONO PROJECTS FUNO 444 OBLIGATIONS

AS OF 19-Aw-92

CLARK COUNTY EAST RANGE UASH DETENTION BASIN RAUHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS RAUHIDE CHANNEL ANNIE OAKEY-PALM VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM IMPROWENTS VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM

CLARK COUNTY OUTLYING AREAS UNNAMED UASH - LAUGHLIN

C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS BUFFALO CHANNEL (SUCWERLIN PKUY)

GOWAN DETENTION BASINS

OAKEY ELVD. DETENTION BASIN UASHINTON AVE/SANDHILL OUTFALL

C I T Y OF HENDERSON C-1 CHANNEL SYSTEM PITTHAN UASH CHANNEL -PHASE 2 PITTHAN UASH CHANNEL -PHASE 3 UPRR CHANNEL

C I T Y OF BOULDER C I T Y HEHENUAY UASH

C I T Y OF MESQUITE T W N UASH DETENTION BASIN

C I T Y OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

UPPER LAS VEGAS UASH DE1 BASIN

WEST RANGE UASH DIVERSION DIKE

CLA.06.A.91 CLA.0Z.F.92 CLA.OZ.F.92 CLA.03.D.91 CLA.03.E.92 CLA.03.F.92

LAU.Ol.E.92

LAS.OZ.E.91 LAS.02.E.92 LAS.03.C.91 LAS.03.C.91 LAS.04.0.92 LAS.OP.C.91

HEN.04.A.91 HEN.Ol.O.91 HEN.Ol.A.87 HEN.03.E.92

BOU.Ol.A.87

llES.Ol.E.89

NLV.05.B.92

NLV.03.A.88

a,62o,ooo a,62o,ooo 2,820,000 1,391,000 02/13/92

594,485 834,515 07/09/92 7,070,200 7,070,200

921,800 921,800 0 06/11/92 0 1,627,000 (1,627,000) 07/09/92

4,100,000 4,100,000 0 03/12/92

1,500,000 1,500,000 2,245,500 (2,245,500) 08.13.92

10,240,000 10,900,000 (660,000) 11/14/91 (3,400,000) 2,740,000 08.13.92

7,970,000 9,519,200 (1,549,200) 05/09/92 1,700,000 1,700,000 0 11/14/91

6,000,000 6,000,000 3,470,000 2,520,000 950,000 11/14/91 3,162,200 3,162,200 2,300,000 2,600,000 (300,000) 03/12/92

0 1,327,000 11/14/91 (460,000) (867,000) 02/13/92

5,448,304 5,448,304 D 11/14/91 (1,310,800) 1,310,800 04/09/92

12,800,000 12,900,000 (100,000) 01/9/92 (3,950,000) 3,950,000 05/09/92

4,000,000 4,000,000

3 4 of 3 9 .. _ * - - -

i

FUNDING REQUESTS AND PRIORITIES REPORT (FY 92/93) 27-Aug-92

I file:GWf:m:\excel\funpri93.xls

Requests Comments/ Bond FY 92/93 Entity Amount Project Description Received

Funding Priority Numbers

#

13-Aug-92 93-4B CLV $2,245,500 Buffalo Channel; Summerlin to Vegas Dr. 14-Jul 9 1 3-Aug-92 93-38 CLV ($3,400,000) Gowan Detention Basins - 1 st Suppl. 14-Jul 8

9-JuI-92 93-28 CC $1,627,000 Van Buskirk Phase V 9-Jun 7 9-Jul-92 93-5 CLV $26,000 Gowan Detention Basins - 7th Suppl. 9-Jun 6 9-JuI-92 93-4 CLV $93,000 Buffalo Ch. (Westcliff - Doe) 9-Jun 5 9-JuI-92 93-3 CLV $65,000 Rampart Storm Drain 9-Jun 4 9-JuI-92 93-2 HEND $1,385,000 Sunset Detention Basin 9-Jun 3 9-Jut-92 93- 1 B CC $594,485 Rawhide Channel - 1st Suppl. 9-Jun 2 9-JuI-92 93-1 CLV $50,000 Oakey Detention System - 2nd Suppl. 9-Jun 1

Approval Date List List Date

16 1 1 -Aug Cheyenne Channel $67,000 -CLV 93-1 1 17 17-Aug Hemenway Wash - 7th Suppl. $1 60,000 BC 93- 1 2 18 24-Aug Gowan Detention Basins - 2nd Suppl. $0 CLV 93-68 .

I I I NOTES: a - resubmit or hold funding request

b - Mwter Wan Amendment required c - environmental clearances required d - right-of-way required e - engineering study required f - project presentation required g - Policies & Procedures not followed

I

35 of 39

i

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 8/19/92

Program

I I Funding I Amount

[under constructionl

Oakey Datantion Basin and Collection System

[begin basin &I outfall constJconst. part of collection sys.1

Deeign funddlpart of oonrt. on

$50,000 $50,000 Lone Mountain Detention Basin

[predesignl $50,000 $50,000 CAM-10 Detention Basin (West Centennial)

Icomprete predesignl

Predesign funded Gowan Merth Ch. (Lone Mountain - CAM-10 Det. Basin)

[complete pradesignl

Predesign funded Gowan North Channel (Detention Basin - Lone Mountain) $95,000 $93,000 0 188,000 [const. north of Wstcliff/design south of Westcliff]

Part of design 81 conet. funded buffalo Channel (Veges Dr - Charleston)

,[ROW acquisition] $270,000 $270,000 'Washington Avo Ch. Parallel Drain to F St.

[complete design] Design funded 'flashington Avo. Ch. - Reach 3 (Mojave Rd - 24th St)

[complete design] Design funded Weshington Avo. Ch. - Reach 2 (Honolulu - Mojave Rd)

,[const. from Las Vegas Wash to Virgil Street]

Des. fundedfiunding accelerated Washington Ave. Ch. - Reach 1 (LV Wash - Honolulu)

[design Rampart storm drain] $0 $65,000 $65,000 Peccole Ranch Outfalls (Rampart Storm Drain)

[complete channel from Buffalo to basinlupgrade bridges] $841,000 $67,000 8 908,000 Cheyenne Channel

[complete expansion] $100,000 $100,000 Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion ($26,000 $26,000 [begin constructionl

Funded Gowan Detention Basins

[under constructionl Funded Gowan Outfall Structure (Decatur - Tenaya Way)

Bond Liet [begin constructionl

DrsiOn fundedlconst. on Oakey Detention Basin Outfall $1,049,200 $50,000 Bond List $1,099,200

IMeadows Phase V, Aka Drive Storm Drain (Falcon to I I I Jones) [constructionl 1-15 Freeway Channel (Sahara to Ivanhoe) [NDOT

$0 $954,800 $954,800

oversizing constructionl I $600,000 I $0

93,029,200 Lao Vogae FY 92/93 Total : I $4,285,000 I $1,255,800 $600,000

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 8/19/92 N.:rn:\uo.l\(v92-OS.xh

Program Funding Amoun? I I

UPRR Channel Funded

[under construction]

Lower C-1 Channel (Lake Mead Dr. - Drake St.) Design fundedlconst. on Bond

[complete designlconstruction to begin1 List

Sunset Det. Basin, Collection Sys. & Outfall (incl. ROW) $1,385,000 $1,385,000 $0 Ipredesign & ROW acquisition of basin1

Mission Hills Det. Basin & Collection System (incl. ROW) Design part fundadlpart of

[complete designlconstruction to begin] const. on Bond List

Pittman Wash (Sunset - UPRR) & Pittman Park Det. Basin Design fundedlchennel const.

[channel under constructionlcomplete basin predesignl funded

Pittman Wash (Duck Creek - Stephanie St) Design funded

Confluence Detention Basin (incl. ROW) Design fundedlconstruction

[complete designlbegin construction] on Bond List

Upper Las Vegas Wash Interception BermlChannal Funded

[under construction]

Upper Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin Funded

[under constructionl

North Las Vegas Datantion Basin (outlet modifications) $30,000 $30,000

[construct modifications]

West Range Wash Diversion Dike Design fundedlpart of const.

[begin constructionl on Bond List 8 1,200,000 8 1,200,000

Sloan Channel (Les Vegas Wash - Confluence Det. Basin) $800,000 $800,o0O [design]

Kyle Canyon Detention Basin (incl. ROW) Design funded

[complete dasignlROW acquisition1 $100,000 $100.000

Las Vegas Wash (Craig to Civic) ,[complete

construction] $00,000 $60,000 $0 North Las Voges FY 92/93 Total : I $2,190,000 $60,000 82,130,000

37 o f 3 9 _. _. - - f . -

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 8/19/92

Program

Funding Amount Facilitv DaacriDtion Amount Promrammad

1 West Levee - Muddy River IDesign funded

BOND PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 8/14/92

file:GWF:m:\excel\sum bd.xls

I I TOTAL OF I FUNDING I PROGRAM I

MESQUITE Town Wash Detention Basin $5,448,304 I $4,137,504 $1,310,800

TOTAL - MESQUITE i::-ij::~.:i::~:,:!:,::~.:.:.:.:.::::ij::~::.:::.:::,i:~ii::::::::J::j:

BOULDER CITY (no projects) $0 I $0 Hemenway Wash - 4th Suppl. $1 ,?