note on manual work

41P16SE0027 2.17098 BRYCE 010

January 27, 1997

Work Record - Costs Summary

Les Gondor 144 Shaftesbury St., North York, Ontario, M3H 5M2Prosp. Lie. #A50721 Ph.# - 416 585-6328

Days Prospecting: Sept. 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, k 26 1996.Oct. 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27 k 28 1996.

Cost calculated at $100 per day times 15 days = $1,500.00

G. Atkins 20 Hearthstone Cres., Willowdale, Ontario, M2R 1G3Prosp. Lie. #A50721 Ph.# - 416 633-1660

Days Prospecting: October 20, 25, 26, 27 t 28 1996.

Cost calculated at $150 per day times 5 days = $750.00

John A. Gore Box 212, Cobalt, Ontario, TOJ ICOProsp. Lie. #B23436 Ph.# - 705 679-5710

Days prospecting: Sept. 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25 Se 26 1996.Oct. 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, Se 2 8 1996

Cost calculated at $150 per day times 15 days = $2,250.00 Mileage: $872.40 Tot. = $3,122.40

Steve Hohban Box 525, Deep River, Ontario, KOJ 1POProsp. Lie. #K22977 Ph.# - 613 584-4401

Days Prospecting: Sept. 20, 21 k 22 1996.Oct. 25, 26 Se 27 1996.

Costs calculated at $100 times 6 days = $600.00 p.. Q Mileage: $154.50 Tot. = $754.50 ^

Total Assay Costs : - Swastika Laboratories: $836.75

Art Beecham: - Field Trips - Oct. 21 k 27 1996.Tot. Fee: $814.54

RECEIVED

FEB 2 8 1997

MINING LANDSRRAMf H

NOTE ON MANUAL WORK

On the days spent conducting manual physical work, the equipment used consisted of two types of grub hoes, a swedish pick, a large digging pick, prospecting picks, a large axe, a sounding bar, pointed shovels, a sledge hammer, cold chisels, a water bucket, wire brooms and brushes.

January 27, 1997 OP. 96-039

PERSON HOURS CALCULATIONS

Prospecting - L. Condor 136 hrs. @ $12.50 per hr. $1,700.00

Prospecting assistance:

G. Atkins 40 hrs. @ $18.75 per hr. $750.00

John A. Gore 120 hrs. @ $20.81 per hr. $3,122.40

Steve Hohban 48 hrs. @ $15.71 per hr. $754.50

A. W. Beecham:

Consulting k Field Work: 21 hrs. @ $25.00 per hr. $ 525.00

Drafting: 12 hrs. @ 15 per hr. $ 180.00

Total: 377 person hours with 37.031.90 expended.

Received from Recude

M?UZ~ (

. 2.S- , .2.6,

2.0 19

-L100

Received Irom Recu de L-

19

ollars

pod

2.,

100

G. Atkins20 Hearthstone Cres. North York, Ontario M2R 1G3

416 633-1660

October 29, 1996.

INVOICE No. 96-3

FIELD ASSISTANCE SUMMARY - To: L. Gondor - Re: OP 96-039

October 20, 25, 26, 27 k 28 1996

Labour Services: 5 days @ $150 per day $ 750.00

This translates to 40 hours of person labour hours.

TOTAL DUE: S 750.00

p

Bryce Project

January 27, 1997.

SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT

LOCATION AND ACCESS:

RECEIVED

FEB281997 *

MINING LANDS BRANCH

This project encompasses 56 claims in northeastern Ontario, more specifically, in the south-westerly part of Robillard Township, in the north-westerly part of Bryce Township, in the south-easterly part of Truax Township and in the north-easterly part of Tudhope Township in the Larder Lake Mining Division, in the District of Timiskaming.

NTS MAP SHEETS:

LONGITUDE:

LATITUDE:

41 P/9 and 41 P/16

80 degrees 07 minutes

47 degrees 45 minutes

l 4.

The Town of Englehart is approximately 16 kms. to the north-east of the property.

An all-weather gravel road for 2 kms. south from Mount MacDonald, a small hamlet on Highway 560, provides road access. An additional l km. walk south, along a road allowance, is required to reach the north west and central portion of the claims.

The claims on the easterly side of Mearow Lake may be accessed by using a gravel road south from Highway 560 in Lot 9 in Robillard Township. After passing a radio tower and a dump, a walking trail for l km. south provides a convenient access to the eastern claims.

An all-weather gravel road through the Hill Lake Fish Hatchery provides a year round access to the main mineralized showing which is in the six unit claim number 1189221. This can be reached by using an old drill road for about 2 kms. in a northerly direction.

2/

- 2 -

KEY AND CLAIM LOCATION MAPS: *

There are 56 claims in total.

27 claims in Bryce Township, 2 claims in Truax Township, 22 claims in Robillard Township and 5 claims in Tudhope Township

Listed as follows:

1117729111773011177311117732111773311177341117735111773611177371117738117670411767071189221 - 6 claims1189222 - 1 claim1190204 - 4 claims

1117739111774011177411117742111774311177441091645109164610916471091648117670511767081186772 - 2 claims1186773 - 2 claims

1091649109165010919391126295113590911359101091940961204

117670211767031176706117670111902031200717

- 4 claims

All the claims are in good standing.

-See Attached Location Map labelled as Schedule "A 1

-See Attached Claim Map labelled as Schedule "B"

3/

CEVli

X

U

CUo-l

f boundary claim

Tlli7'i734

C-—-Tudhope Twp.li/8 ?06 TwP- L117 73 7

1000 MOO 10000

North American Datum 1927.Universal Transverse Mercator (6*) projection.Zone 17. Central Meridian 81 * W.Gr d interval IQOamdUM. *-Legend and explanatory notes obtainable Irom

- --..- iii^.nro ^' Matural

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The study area is underlain by Precambrian rocks of the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. The property lies on the northern edge of a belt of mostly Keewatin metavolcanic rocks. These rocks meet the southern edge of the Round Lake Batholith. The study area is north west of a large irregular body of porphyritic intermediate volcanic flow. Narrow dikes of quartz porphyry, quartz feldspar porphyry and feldspar porphyry intrude rocks of the Catherine Group.

The claim group lies between two major structures; the Montreal River Fault and the Cross Lake Fault. Both of these faults have a north-west trend. There are numerous showings, deposits and mining camps in the area of these two faults.

The Montreal River Fault is located some 15 to 18 kms. west of the property. The Cross Lake Fault is about 2 kms. east of the claim group.

LOCAL GEOLOGY

In the Condor holding there are two types of faults and shear zones. One is north-east trending (070 bearing). The other is north-south trending (030 bearing) such as the Mearow Lake Fault.

The easterly side of the claim block are underlain by the Keewatin Catherine Group. These rocks are massive-fine to medium grained flows interbedded with pillowed flows. The metavolcanic rocks strike north-east and dip near vertical.

The claims on the westerly side comprise the contact area where the mafic metavolcanics have been intruded by the intermediate intrusive rocks of the Round Lake Batholith. The Round Lake Batholith is composed of foliated trondhjemite which is grey in colour and medium grained.

The Britcana Porphyry, consisting of mostly feldspar porphyry, is located about one kilometre southeast of the claim block. It is suspected that the gold in the area may be associated with the intrusion of this porphyry body. Please refer to attached geological maps labelled as CI and C2.

4/

- 4 -

PREVIOUS WORK DONE:

Prospecting was carried out on this claim block from the early part of the century, as evidenced by the trenches and pits on the property.

In 1980, the former Paquette claims, located in the northwest corner of the claim block, were examined for Terry Gold Explorations Incorporated. Geological mapping and geophysical surveys were conducted. Best assay results were 0.05 oz. of gold per ton.

In 1981, Terry Gold Explorations Incorporated conducted geological, magnetic, VLF (EM-16) and scintillometer surveys on the claims straddling Bryce, Truax, Robillard and Tudhope Townships.

MPH Consulting Limited conducted geological mapping in 1981 on a six claim block of claims for Petromet Resources Ltd. Detailed mapping was completed on some trenches on land currently held by L. Gondor. Best assay results were 2.65 oz . per ton of gold (2.62 oz. per ton on check assay). There is no record of any drilling being done to test this gold showing - referred to as the "Mearow-MeCombe Showing".

McAdam Resources Inc. conducted, in 1986, a magnetometer survey on a 30 claim block partly within the southeast portion of the Gondor holdings. There were 3 holes drilled in 1986 and 2 in 1989 on claims currently held by L. Gondor. The drilling intersected low grade gold veins.

Placer Dome Inc. commissioned Geosearch Consultants Ltd. in 1988 to conduct magnetic and VLF surveys on a nine claim block in the northwest part of Bryce Township currently held by L. Gondor. Two conductors were identified. Although drilling was recommended, there is no record of follow-up work.

In 1989, L. Gondor prospected the north central group of claims and the best assay results obtained were 0.11 oz. of gold per ton in claim number 1091645 in the Sl/2 of Lot 10 in Con. l in Robillard Township.

In 1990, Morris-Swanson conducted magnetic and VLF surveys on a 29 claim block partly within the northeast portion of the current holdings of L. Gondor.

5/

- 5 -

PREVIOUS WORK DONE: (Continued)*

In October 1990, magnetic and VLF surveys were conducted on the initial 12 Gondor claim block not covered by water. By April 1991, these surveys were completed. In addition, magnetics and VLF surveys were conducted in the new claims acquired by L. Gondor to the south-west including the zone of contact as ascertained in the field. Promising areas were further identified for additional work. In January, 1991 three I. P. lines were run in claims 1091650, 1091648, 1126295 and 1091939. The results of the I.P. survey were encouraging.

In 1991, the claims were optioned to Kingswood Explorations 1985 Ltd. Additional I. P. lines were run which confirmed the anomalies. Four holes were drilled on the west side of Mearow Lake, in Robillard Township. The drilled anomalies did not intersect economic gold mineralization.

In June and September 1991, a sampling programme was undertaken in the vicinity of the 1991 drill programme and along the geophysical baseline to the Mearow-McCombe showing.In August and September 1992 a sampling and prospecting programme was undertaken by G-A on the eastern part of the claim block. Best assay results were 0.094 and 0.047 oz. of gold per ton.

In August and September 1992 a sampling and prospecting programme was undertaken by L. Gondor on the eastern part of the claim block. Best assay results were 0.094 and 0.047 oz. of gold per ton.

In December 1992 a helicopter airborne survey was conducted by Geonex Aerodat Inc. over the entire claim block.

In the summer and fall of 1993, a sampling and stripping programme was conducted by L. Gondor on the significant northeast trending (070 bearing) several kilometre-long shear zone in the Bryce Township section of the claim block. Prospecting was conducted in specific areas that were recommended as promising by existing geological mapping and previously completed geophysical studies. A new gold bearing sheared area, north of the creek, north-south trending and about a quarter of a mile south of Mearow Lake, was discovered through OPAP funding. Structurally, it contained folding, minor faulting and quartz veining. Visible pyrite was apparent in the quartz veins and surrounding rock. Best assay results were 0.064 and 0.04 oz . of gold per ton.

6/

- 6

PREVIOUS WORK DONE: (continued:

In the winter of 1993/94 a total of 11.4 line km. ground magnetic survey was conducted over promising targets on the north-east trending shear zone over Mearow Lake. An EM-16 survey was run on cross lines for a total of 8.1 kms. Details of this survey are provided in a Report by Mr. A. W. Beecham dated May 22, 1994. In addition, the grid established in the winter of 1993/94, was extended during the summer of 1994. Ground magnetometer and VLF surveys were conducted over the north-east trending shear zone.

L. Condor conducted a geochemical survey in the fall of 1994 over the targeted area specified in the helicopter survey. Manual work was carried out at sample locations with elevated gold and arsenic values. A sheared structure was discovered which appeared to be associated with the "Pit" described as "flow top breccia" by Cobalt Resident Geologist Jim Ireland.

A five kilometre grid over the Mearow Lake Fault and over the north-east trending shear zones was established in the winter of 1995 in preparation for forthcoming VLF and I.P. surveys.

In the fall of 1995 a programme of prospecting, mapping, traversing, flagging and stripping was conducted over areas indicated as promising by the 1994/95 winter I. P. programme as shown on the attached compilation map dated 4 January 1996 prepared by Mr. A.W. Beecham.

Please refer to attached maps illustrating the previous work done labelled as Schedules "2355A and 2355B" from a Report dated August 26, 1991 by James Burns and John Boniwell. See also compilation maps labelled as Schedules "2355E, 2355F, 2355G and 2355H" completed by L. Condor and attached to this report.

li

- 7 -

WORK DONE:

In the fall of 1996, a programme of prospecting and bedrock sampling was conducted by L. Condor and assisted by G. Atkins, J. A. Gore and S. Hohban over areas deemed promising by the recent completed geophysical surveys and the work programme recommended by Mr. A.W. Beecham in his report dated January 4, 1996.

On October 21 and 27, 1996, L. Condor and assistants were accompanied by Mr. A.W. Beecham who conducted field examinations as documented in a report dated January 7, 1997 (copy attached as an Appendix).

Also attached, is a compilation map dated January 5, 1997. This map was prepared by Mr. A.W. Beecham and illustrates the sample locations (indicates the traverses) and the locations of the newly discovered occurrences.

On October 25, 1996, Mr. Jim Ireland, Cobalt Resident Geologist and Mrs. Elaine Basa, Staff Geologist conducted a site inspection of the property.

Please refer to the daily log, detailing the field activities attached and labelled as Schedule "D".

Also, please refer to the Description of Samples attached and labelled as Schedule "E".

All the proposed work was completed.

RESULTS:

There were several new veins and occurrences discovered in an area not previously intensely prospected located east of the Mearow Lake Fault and south-west of Site # l which is a previously reported gold showing discovered by L. Condor.

The most promising of these new discoveries were described in detail in Mr. Beecham's notes attached as an appendix. One discovery is the "Roberta Occurrence". Please refer to the attached pictures depicting this site.

Attached are copies of the Laboratory Certificates of the assay results labelled as Schedules "F-l, F-2, F-3, F-4 k F-5 and F-6".

8/

- 8 -

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that more intensive prospecting, stripping, power washing and mapping be conducted over the newly discovered occurrences and over Site # l.

In addition, the favourable sites for gold mineralization should be drill tested.

Submitted respectfully,

REFERENCES

1. Beecham, A.W., 1997 Notes on Field Examination, dated January 7, 1997.

2. Beecham, A.W., 1996 Notes on Field Examination, dated January 4, 1996

Boileau, P., Lortie, P., 1995:

Induced Polarization Survey, by Val d'Or Geophysique for Gondor-Atkins Associates, Bryce Township, dated April 7, 1995.

Beecham, A.W., 1994 Geophysical and Geochemical Surveys, Prospecting and Geological Mapping Gondor-Atkins Claims. December 20, 1994.

Beecham, A.W., 1994 VLF-EM and Magnetic Surveys and Geological Notes. Gondor-Atkins Claims. May 22, 1994.

Johnson, I. 1992: Report of an helicopter airborne survey flown by Geonex Aerodat Inc. for Gondor-Atkins Associates dated December 30, 1992.

7. Boniwell, J.B. and Burns, J., 1991:

Geological and Diamond Drilling Report

8. Johns, G.W., 1986: Geology of the Hill Lake Area, Geological Report, O.G.S., Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.

9. Newall, J., 1986: Report on a Ground Magnetometer Survey

10. Moorhouse, W.W., 1941: Geology of the Bryce-Robillard Area,Geological Report, Vol. L, Part IV, 1941, O.D.M.

A? ft

:\

C;i V -nT&jo* j IH77.3-K

mTT^^^0 "/^ -v. JJ^P*-*/;-

J 6n / ' /^ '^JJ.^.^.S±:^JW1..^... Z-

if*

G

\\ tt

Motor road. Provincial highwaynumber encircled where applicable.

Other road.Trail, portage, winter road" hem Hematite

International or Provincial boundary

Counry, District. Regional or District Municipal Boundary, with mile post.

Municipal Boundary, (City, Town, improvement District, Incorporated Township), with milepost. Township, indian Reserve, Meridian, Base Line, Provincial Park, with mil&post. (surveyed, unsurveyed).

'Unconsolidated deposits Cenozoic deposits are represented Dy the lighter coloured and uncotoured

(l) parts of the map.

te| j ''Bedrock geology. Outcrops and interred exten sions of each rock jnit are shown respectively in deep and light [ones of the same, colour Where in places a formation is too narrow to show colour and must be represented in black, a short tiack bar ap pears in the appropriate block.

Mining property, surveyed Mineral ~ deposit or mining property, unsurveyed.

eStratigraphic position is not implied by lithologicposition in the legend" ...^^

9 All boundary ana survey lines are approximateThe letter "G" preceding a rock unit number, tor ex- position only, ample "G 13" indicates interpretation from geophy sical data Some symbols may npt occur on this map.

4 A ir,*? -""W *

2- l 7098Schedule "D"

Dailv Locr

Proiect Area: Brvce-Robillard

Work Performed by Applicant and shown on map dated January 5, 1997 by A. W. Beecham (attached)

Sept. 19, 1996 Prospected south of Site #1 along Line IDE to3+75S. Predominately jack pine, prospected from south side of pond.

Sept. 20, 1996 Prospected along South Shear (opposite of Site# l on south side of pond) south to 4 + OOS on Line 10E. Uncovered some quartz veining.

Sept. 21, 1996 Prospected area between Line 10E 4 + OOS andLine 6E 4+OOS. Extensive outcropping, treed with ridging. Prospected along east side of creek.

Sept. 22, 1996 Prospected and discovered the Robertaoccurrence. Fairly flat area, generally less than a foot overburden.

Sept. 24, 1996 Prospected in the vicinity of the RobertaOccurrence. Samples taken at outcrop 27 Metres North 30 degrees East from south end of "Roberta Occurrence".

Sept. 25, 1996 Prospected along Line 4E and Line 6E and alongthe southern limit of claim 1189221. Heavily treed, well outcropped, little evidence of mineralization.

Sept. 26, 1996 Prospected in vicinity of Roberta Occurrence.

Also prospected south-east along Line 6E 1+OOS

to about 5+OOS. Observed alteration and mineralization. Grab samples taken.

Oct. 19, 1996 Prospected area along south side of pondbetween Line 6E and 7E. Prospected along east side of creek, about 60 metres south of Baseline 0. Treed, steep drop to creek.

i 7098

Prospecting Daily Log (cont'd)

Oct. 20, 1996 Prospected north-east from the RobertaOccurrence to the creek flowing from Site #1 pond. From there, prospected along south side of the creek from Line 7E to Line 9E, then westerly along north side of the creek to Line 7E. Well treed.

Oct. 21, 1996 Prospected along Line 7E from Baseline O to2+50S. Alteration and mineralization observed. Grab samples taken.

Oct. 22, 1996 Prospected along McAdam's Baseline O to Line3E. Also, prospected along Line 7E and Line 8E from Baseline O to 3+OOS. The south west lines ended in a large swamp. Drizzle all day.

Oct. 25, 1996 Prospected and accompanied Resident GeologistJim Ireland and Staff Geologist Mrs. Elaine Basa in area between Line 8E and Line 7E at 4+OOS. Inspected and prospected showings near the Roberta Occurrence. Also, prospected the area between Lines 9E and 10E at 0+50S. Mr. Ireland observed "highly altered" rock by the "Roberta Occurrence".

Oct. 26, 1996 Prospected area between Lines 7E and 8E at4+OOS to 0+50S. Well treed, alteration and mineralization observed. Grab samples taken.

Oct. 27, 1996 Prospected area along Lines 6E and 10E fromBaseline O to 4+25S. Line 6E runs along west side of creek, faulting observed along length.

Oct. 28, 1996 Prospected area from creek to 2 + OOS betweenLines 6+50E and 10+50E. Also prospected area north of Site #1 by the feldspar porphyry dyke. Accompanied by geophysicist Chris Hale. Grab samples taken.

Schedule "E"

Description of Samples

Sample # Sample Type Rock Type Mineralization Assay Results

5931

5932

5933

5934

5935

5936

5937

5938

5939

5940

5941

5942

5943

5944

5945

5946

5947

5948

5949

5950

1751

1752

1753

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Maf . Vol .

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Maf . Vol .

Maf . Vol .

Maf . Vol .

Maf. Vol.

Maf . Vol .

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Quartz

Quartz

Maf. Vol.

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

40 PPB

660 PPB

30 PPB

30 PPB

10 PPB

- NIL -

- NIL -

10 PPB

10 PPB

2 PPB

10 PPB

10 PPB

290 PPB

130 PPB

50 PPB

690 PPB

80 PPB

- NIL -

- NIL -

- NIL -

- NIL -

10 PPB

- NIL -

Description of Samples (cont'd)

1754

1755

1756

1757

1758

1759

1760

1761

1762

1763

1764

1765

1766

1767

1768

1769

1770

1771

1772

1773

1774

1775

1776

1777

1778

1779

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Quartz

Maf. Tuff or Sed.

Maf. Vol.

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Alt. feld. porphyry

Conglomerate

Maf. Vol.

Maf. Vol.

Vol . Flows

Quartz

Quartz

Maf. Vol.

Sed. I. F.

Quartz fc Sed.

Quartz Stock.

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

-

-

-

-

Pyrite

Pyrite

-

-

Pyrite

-

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

- NIL -

2 PPB

21 PPB

43 PPB

not ass.

- NIL -

3 PPB

not ass.

not ass .

not ass.

not ass.

- NIL -

- NIL

not ass.

not ass.

9 PPB

3 PPB

3 PPB

14 PPB

7 PPB

10 PPB

39 PPB

3 PPB

5 PPB

2 PPB

2 PPB

Description of Samples (cont'd)

1780

1781

1782

1783

1784

1785

1786

1787

1788

1789

1790

1791

1792

1793

1794

1795

1796

1797

1798

1799

1800

1801

1802

1803

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Chert

Quartz Se Alt. Basalt

Syenite Dyke

Felsite dyke

Flow Top Breccia

Maf. Vol.

Quartz Vein

Quartz Vein

Quartz Vein

Quartz Vein

Quartz

Quartz

Maf. Vol.

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Chlorite Schist

Feldspar Porphyry

Quartz

Quartz

Quartz

Maf. Vol.

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

-

-

Pyrite

Pyrite

-

Pyrite

-

Arsenopyrite

Arsenopyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

Pyrite

5 PPB

9 PPB

3 PPB

2 PPB

19 PPB

62 PPB

281 PPB

- NIL -

2 PPB

- NIL -

- NIL -

345 PPB

15 PPB

- NIL -

267 PPB

- NIL -

811 PPB

5 PPB

840 PPB

15 PPB

146 PPB

19 PPB

14 PPB

3 PPB

o o a o o

fi

TRUAX TWP.TUDHOPE TWP.

\

a:?h-

X<3 (Tl-

.

Q. 5h-

UJ O.Ox03H

o:3: . ' ' H

0 QL •St .-1 -1

m ott

E.Moidment 11983) .

1 drill hole J Claim boundary J

i

. Terry Gold Explorations

(1981) V A ROBILLARD TWR

BRYCE TWP. Sylvanite (1939) 1Trenching and i

assays j J \—— — ̂ —. — i.^ ..^ . m-. ^J ....:,:.......:.:...-.1 -.A..:.:.....;.....:.:.:.:.:.. •.....•.•..:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.......:-;-;....-.-:.:.!.:'^-:;.-.-.i.v:v-;:--v-:-.-.-:-x-:i:-.-.-:.:-:-.-:.:.:-| i ^....•.•:.:.:.^:•.•.v.:.:'•:•:•:•;•^<•?^:?:r.:.:H^!•^>•!':•::!:•:i^:•;<•^îvX•^!ff^:â!ri•:•:•:•:.: |J.;;^S::v;!.Ml^•.âs^* .., I......

Magnetometer Survey J ' . , VLF-EM Survey Note: This plan overlays Claim Map Scintillometer Survey J Drawing No. E.I.C.- 2355 Geological Survey j li

Me Adam Resources (1986) Magnetometer Survey 7 drill holes

1 —— " r- n 1 , ' 'l \ L J 1^4—^l Sylvanite (1939) , ————————————————— - ———— - —— -^-i l Trenching and assays KINGSWOOD EXPLORATIONS 1985 LTD.

- —— l Roblllard/Bryce Twps Project Ontario

p AREAS OF FILEDP ASSESSMENT WORKftv- * ^^^^^^^H r*v^ A i iniin IMTPRMATII^M AI PRcP. BYt J. G. j.

CD 1 JQ ICON SULI'AN IS LIMIT fcU 0ATE: Julv \ S T^nf"jB TORONTO, ONTARIO SCALE: l':200,QOOlkJj^|||||l|||;il|l|l|lilDWG. No. E.I.C.- 2355A

1

TRUAX TWP.TUDHOPE TWP.

o:

H

X

eeh-

TUDHOPE TWR

oJ

1j m . Morris - Swansong (1990)

Magnetometer Survey VLF-EM Survey

Claim boundary

ROBILLARD TWR

| BRYCE TWP.

1. J -,.,. .,,,... .,,.- .- -., .... .......,.,,,,. ,,::,.:,,^ .-..,..... -.... -

Placer Dome , , . , 9aa i Note: This plan overlays Claim Map

Drawing No. E.I.C.-2355 MagnetometerSurvey f" ™ —— ——— " — "~l VLF-EM Survey

T. Mulholland (I960)

- ' correspondence

Jr 1j KINGSWOOD EXPLORATIONS 1985 LTD.

L ——— l p — j Roblllard/Bryce Twps Project Ontario

J. Morrisuses) AREAS OF FILED

; 1 VLF-EM survey —— | ASSESSMENT WORK^™ 1 ' ^^^H^^^^^BI CY^ A 1 IDIID IklTCnhl ATIOM A 1 PREP- BY. y 3. B.

y I - •JulcONSULIANIS LIMIIkU bATE-' July ddl '^. . 1 ' •TlT^fl TORONTO. ONTARIO SCALE: 1 ;?00.000

m |^JjJ|||||llililiili;|lii DWG- No. E.I.C.- 2355B

Helicopter Airborne (1992)

Claim boundary

rospecting (1992)j p ffi

Roblllard/Bryce Twps Project Ontario

AREAS OF FILED ASSESSMENT WORK

Condor Claims

MO

North Anwican Datum 1927. Universal Traruvtrta Mercator (6*) projection.

- Zona 17. Canual Meridian 81 * W. ~'r- Grid intarval 1000 malra*.

Lagand and aipianatory not** obtainaWa from Public Strvica Canua Ministry ol Natural

*. QutWs Park. Torooto.

FIt

i-i --- f S

Claim boundary

I^SrJrenching ^^ StriPPin8 (l 993)-Prospecting (1993)

Roblllard/Bryce Twpe Project Ontario


Condor ClaimsIOWQ. NO. 6.I.C.-23SSP

North Amtrlcan Oituffl 1927.Univartal TraruvtrM Marcitor (6*) projection.Zont 17. C*nual Meridian 11 * W.Grid Inlarval 1000 maUM.Lagand and anpianatonr notas obtainaMa from Public Sarvica Canva Ministry ol Natural Rasourcas. Quean's Park. Toronto.

TIN MM MM ION*

Contour Interval 10 Mtlrt*

ScHZ.bul.lr:

" — - , ir i yr i -i

* \---. ' l~Claim boundary

LOT 6 ~:~ V --Magnetometer Survey (1994)

l VLF-EM Survey (1994)!Prospecting (1994)

Geochemical Survey (1994) ' -

Trenching and Stripping (1994)

rvv c -ov ~f

\. ~*' -t

Contour Interval 10 M*UM

Roblllard/Bryce Twps Project Ontario

.IK i

?rL*M


Condor ClaimsmP.yr: L.PRAWN ar. L. i

re fZiTT2i

fOWQ. No. E.t.C.-2355QNOTCI

North American Datum 1927. . Univtf i a) TransvtTM Mercator (6*) projection.

- Zon* U. Ctnval Meridian 81* W. ""'.— Grid interval 10001

100L*o*n4 and *xp(*moor nottt obuinabl* (rem Public Service C*n(rt Ministry of Natural

*. Qu**n's Park. Toronto.

60

S2.3ST5* H

l

^ X -rClaim boundary

UT 6 -

Prospecting . (1995 and 1996)

Roblllard/Bryce Twpe Project Ontario


Condor ClaimsNo. IJ.C.-2355H

NOTCI

North Am^letn DtUwn W7.

Contour Inltrvtl 10 Mttow L*g*nd and upiifltioor wits oMainiM* from PuWic S*nric* Ctnvt MlniiUy o* Niturtf R*sourc*s. QutWt Park. Torome.

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of TSL/Assayers Inc.

Assaying - Consulting - RepresentationEstablished 1928

Assay Certificate

Company: L . CONDORProject:Ann: L. Condor

We hereby certijy the following Assay of 14 Rock samples submitted SEP-23-96 by .

6W-3706-RA1

Da;e: SEP-30-96

Sample Number5931 5932 5933 5934 59355936 Not Ree 'd 5937 Not Ree 'd 5938 5939 5940

5941 5942 5943 5944 59455946

Au g/tonne

0.04 0.66 0.03 0.03 0.01

0.01 0.01Nil

0.01 0.01 0.29 0.13 0.050.69

Au Check g/tonne

0.55

-

0.24

0.72

Au oz/ ton0.001 0.019 ^.001 ^.001 CO. 001

CO. 001 ^.001 ^.001

^.001 ^.001 0.008 0.004 0.0020.020

Au Check oz/ ton

0.016

-

0.007

0.021

One assay ton portion used.

Certified by , ^ W '

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK 1TO

II

H



Assay Certificate

Company: L . CONDORProject:Ann: L. Gondor

We hereby certify the following Assay of 10 Rock samples submitted SEP-28-96 by .

6W-3868-RA1

Date: OCT-07-96

Sample Number

Aug/tonne""Nil

0.01Nil Nil Nil

Au oz/ton

Au Check g/tonne

17511752175317545936

.001

Nil59375947594859495950

Nil0.08NilNilNil

.002

Ni


Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika. Ontario POK 1TO

r -r



Assay Certificate


We hereby certify the following Assay of 7 Rock samples submitted OCT-24-96 by .

6W-4445-RA1

Date: OCT-30-96

Sanpie Nunijer

Au Au Check PPB , PPB

Au Au Check oz/ton oz/ton

17751776177717781779

17801781

393522

59

--

3--

.10

0.00NiNiNiNi

NiNi

l-

Nil--

-Nil


Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK 1TO Telephone (705) 642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

n"F- +

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of TSL/Assaycrs Inc.

Established 1928 Assaying - Consulting . Representation

Geochemical Analysis Certificate 6W-4538-RG1

Company: L . CONDOR Date: NOV-07-96Project:Ann: L. Condor

We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 2 Chip samples submitted OCT-3 1 -96 by .

Sample Au Au Check Number PPB PPB

1791 345 257


Certified by S \

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK 1TOrr* .i rt ^ i, ~ ^ ^ /•-^r\^^r^o oo^^ tT1 A V i

H f -5 /i

SWASTIKA LAB:11-12-96 : 57PM

P01 C6J Ri

Swastika LaboratoriesElUblllhed Ittt

d MOV Certificate

Company. L . CONDORProject.Ann- L. Condor

A Dlviilon o f TSI.M

Assaying - Consulting . ReprescnUlion

6W-460J-RA1

D.HC NOV.12-06

hereby certify the following Asiay OJ' 17 Rock samples .submiued OCT-29-96 by .

Number

1782

1784 1785 1786

1787 1788 1789 1790 1792J 793 1794 1795 1796 17971798 1799

Au Au check PPB PPB

32 19 62 67

281Nil

2 Ni 1 Nil 315

.Nil 267 Nil 811

S840 542 15

Au Au check 02 1 t on oz/lon

Nil Nil

0 001 0 002 0.002 - 0 008

Nil NilNil Nil Nil

Nil 0 008

Nil 0.024

Nil

0 024 0 016Nil

Certified by-•S.:

P.O. Box 10. Swastika, Ontario POK ITO Telephone ( 705) 642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

F -

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of TSL/Assayers I nc.

Assaying - Consulting . RepresentationEstablished 1928

Geochemical Analysis Certificate


We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 18 Rock samples submitted DEC-11-96 by .

6W-5238-RG1

Date: DEC-17-96

Sample Number1755 1756 1757 1759 17601762 1765 1766 1769 17701771 1772 1773 1774 1800186! 1802 1803

Au PPB

2 21 43

Nil 35

Nil Nil

9 33

14 7 10

1461914 3

Au Check PPB

29

-

163

-

Au oz/ton

Nil 0.001 0.001

Nil NilNil Nil Nil Nil NilNil Nil Nil Nil

0.004Nil NilNil

Au Check oz/ton

0.001

-

0.005

-


Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK l TO

Appendix

Notes on Field Examination by A.W. Beecham October 1996. Jan. 1997

Condor Atkins Claims, Bryce Tp.

Introduction

The following comments are based on field examinations on 21st and 27th Oct. 1996 and tlie writer's previous wo.k on the property. The author accompanied owners, L. Gondor, G. Atkins, prospector J Gore of Cobalt, Ontario and Steve Hohban of Deep River, Ontario. Areas hand stripped in the central part of Claim 1189221 around what is now referred to as the Roberta Occurrence and a small area north of Site # l were examined. The newly exposed veins as well as tlie feldspar porphyry dyke just north of Site #1 were mapped in. Most of the 1996 samples shown on tlie accompanying compilation map were collected by Gondor and associates. The writer collected a few samples of the better veins around tlie Roberta Occurrence and further south.

Some of tlie drilling data were reviewed and one section plotted. The casing of diamond drill hole B89-3 was located in the field and tied in to the McAdam grid and its map location was corrected

Significant progress was made in the 1996 prospecting in that a number of new veins were exposed and the zone of scattered, anomalous gold values was extended another 350m farther south. This zone now extends (from BL "B", 3+50S in tlie north to McAdam line L7E/2+75S in the south) a distance of 750 m north-south. Tlie zone has an east-west dimension of about 100m.

New Veins and Occurrences

Most of the newly discovered veins lie within an 'island' of high ground surrounded by creeks and swamp in the general area south of Site #1. These consists of white to grey quartz veins with up to a few percent pyrite and a little rusty weathering carbonate in mafic volcanics, and one quartz stockwork within an altered feldspar porphyry dyke Although tlie zone as a whole trends north-south, individual veins strike at various directions including east-west. Anomalous gold values (i.e over 200 ppb Au) occur at 3 different sites within this cluster. Two of these occurrences are of note

At 1+35S/7+80E on the McAdam grid, a l to 2 m wide, mottled grey vein referred to as "the Big Quartz Vein" i s exposed in one small outcrop Tlie vein, although pod like, seems to strike about E-W and dips north. It contains a little carbonate, minor pyrite and a trace of arsenopyrite (arsenopyrite identified by geologist, Chris Hale). Values vary from nil up to 811 ppb Au The structure can be easily stripped to die west and northwest, but to the east it projects into low ground.

Tlie Roberta Occurrence consists of a stockwork of quartz with a little pyrite and minor specularite within a NNW striking, 2 to 4m wide, sheared, fractured, altered feldspar porphyry dyke At the southeast edge of the exposure, about one metre of strong, pale brown silicification occurs along tlie east contact of the dyke. Values are variable from very low up to 690 ppb Au. Although it does not mark the best gold concentration, this is the widest zone of veining and it contains the strongest alteration of any 'structure' exposed on the property The dyke seems to be

expanding to the south and it may have some reasonably tonnage potential. The zone is exposed on high ground and it appears that considerably more of it can be easily stripped.

Drilling Data

An east-west section through drill hole B89-2 was plotted up. This hole tested the north- south shear and vein exposed at Site #1 some 30m south of the showing. It intersected the best gold values encountered to date on the claims, 1.01 g/t Au across 3.8 m, (core leigth). "Die gold values occur in quartz veins with about l "/o pyrite. A trace of arsenopyrite and galena is also reported The veins occur in a fault zone which correlates with the north-south fault interpreted through Site # l and the pond to the south. In plan the values appear to lie well to the west of this fault. However, die exact location of the fault under the pond is not known. If it is assumed to subcrop at the west shore of the pond, this would indicate a steep westward dip as seen in outcrop. As the veins carrying the gold values occur in a fault zone in the drill hole, it is reasonable to correlate these with the north-south topographic depression through the pond. In the author's opinion the section does not seem to indicate another zone west of the pond as suggested by L Gondor.

Site # l Structure

This structure is described in the author's report of Jan. 1996. North of the showing a feldspar porphyry dyke which occupies the same fracture or a nearby parallel fracture to that of the Site #1 mineralization was mapped in and added to the compilation. Although this dyke is similar to tlie setting of the recently uncovered Roberta Occurrence no veining or gold values have been found in it Other parts of this dyke could be mineralized.

Discussion

Significant gold concentrations are associated with a number of nearly north-south structures, faults and feldspar porphyry dykes. Tlie most prominent of these is the (north-south) fault interpreted through Site # l. (Site #1 Fault) It is not clear at this stage whether these auriferous fractures are part of tlie Mearow Lake Fault zone (being subsidiary fractures or splays) or if they are, perhaps, older fractures which are truncated by the Mearow Lake Fault Hence, it is not clear whether additional prospecting should cover a broad zone of several hundreds metres width along the Mearow Lake Fault or just the narrow, 100m wide north-south corridor on projection of the zone through Site # l and the Roberta Occurrence.

The best values to date, those in drill hole B89-2, are from veins along a fault zone which at this point appears to come to surface within a depression. This type of mineralization can probably only be found by diamond drilling. In this regard detailed mapping along the structures and better definition of their surface expression may be useful in picking favourable drilling sites.

Except for the one metre wide zone of strong silicification at the Roberta Occurrence, no significant zones of strong, pervasive alteration have been recognized. Although such zones of

lil

alteration (carbonate, silicification, sericite) are, unquestionably favourable indications of gold mineralization, there art many examples of economic gold deposits with no widespread alteration and its absence on this property should not interpreted too negatively.

Soil geochemistry has been recommended (by the author) in previous reports. However, it is now apparent that the most likely targets strike about north-south and parallel to the direction of ice movement. Any mineralized till streaks would therefore be expected to have a very narrow east-west dimension making their detection difficult by soil geochemistry. Soil geochemistry is therefore not recommended, except possibly for some detailed sampling across some of the north- south depressions.

Recommendations

Although the prospecting and drilling to date have uncovered a number of new gold occurrences, all of these are low grade. Whether more work is likely to uncover better grades or if the grades found to date are typical is not known. At some stage, however, it will be necessary to decide if in fact the property warrants more work or if die same efforts on other properties might be more rewarding. It is the author's opinion that the property should be pursued somewhat further, at least to the point of properly stripping, washing and sampling the strike extensions of the Site # l, the Roberta and the Big Quartz Vein occurrences. Other work that should be considered is the following: (1) more prospecting in an attempt to extend the general Site # l -Roberta corridor of mineralization farther to the south; (2) additional detailed mapping and prospecting along north- soudi depressions such as the one marking die structure south of Site # l, which may identify favourable sites for gold mineralization which can then be drill tested; and (3) reconnaissance prospecting along a broad corridor along the east side of the Mearow Lake Fault.

Stripping can be best done using an excavator that can clean out small bedrock depressions. This should be closely followed by washing with a pressure pump Even after careful stripping veins are often not obvious until the exposure is washed. Only dien can one continue to follow the veins with the excavation.

AW Beecham, M.Se., F G A C Haileybury, Ontario, 7th Jan 1997

Beecham A W(Jan. 1996)

Notes on Field Examination and Compilation, Gondor - Atkins Claims, Bryce Township , Dist Timisk. ON.

lv

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Minea

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMlnlno Act. Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990

Transaction Number (office me)

Assessment Ffles Imaging

Personal ir Mining Act, Questions 933 Rams*

41P16SE0027 2.17098 BRYCE 900

65(2) and 66(3} of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the lessment work and correspond with the mining land holder, inistry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor,

Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands be - Please type or print in ink.

1 . Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name

tfLZ Ga^toJt

WE0C'11TFDrp''*4A * U y g

FEB 28 1997

MINING LAND:Address

744 ZuAfTf^'&uA.V 3T-

Moertt y&X. c+STAAio Ml tt S-/V2-Name

Address

f "•f

Client Number 5 BRANCH /BS CXJ-&Telephone Number

-#fr ^BS'-G,33.3Fax Number

Client Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check t ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

Geotechnical: prospecting^ surveys^ assays and work under section 18 (regs) D Physical: drilling, stripping,

trenching and associated assays | | Rehabilitation

Work Type .G

Office UseCommodity

Total S Value of Work Claimed /;. J/,

From /? O ? 9* On 1 Month 1 Y*w

ToD*i

/OMonth | Y*v

NTS ReferenceGlobal Positioning System Data (if available)

—: 47

Township/Area

M or G-Plan Number

H*, DM*.

Resident GeologistDistrict ,- t ,M/ f-

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;-- -; - - - provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;' -- - complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;

. *7l?i?iVTWnToj^r, provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work; MINING DI VISION jnc|u(je two copies of your technical report.

FEB 13 1997

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name

- -f "" Ji G-Z (jorfb&Z. ~Address

/44 ZHAfTeg&fAY S7~~, M Y. . O*), rt 34 M 2-Name

fl/2-T ^6.6. CM A MAddress

Name } . . . ' . '

Address

Telephone Number

Fax Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number-705 673. - 39*60

Telephone Number

Fax Number

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

l, , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the besUpQny knowledge, the annexed report is true.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Date

27 ./?r?Agent's Address elephone Number Fax Number

5. Work to be recorded and distributed.the mining land where work was performed, must accompany this form.

Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link

Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

eg

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6———— mm

1 \

8

9

10.

11

12

13

14

15

TB 7827

1234567 .

1234568

~ Su.

re c E i v c"FEB28 1997

^IKIINU LAMPOON

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

16 ha

12

2

rVrr/:

^^-\LJ 1

Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.

S26, 825

0

S 8, 892

k^/rX

Value of work applied to thisclaim.

N/A

S24,000

S 4,000

Sc-AZlatte

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

S24,000

0

0

^*fe

Lev3———— IT3 ————— V^1*—— f ——

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.

S2.825

0

S4.892

l, , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible underl Fun Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application tothe claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Date

,27

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( f ) in the boxes below to show howyou wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated. 4*3 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp

RECEIVED —— LARDER LAKE ——————————————————————— ZL^Z. ————————

MINING DIVISION

FEB 13 1997^^^5/^VDate/pdratt f " \ X

\ ^^^^ J

Date Notification Sent

Total Value of Credit Approved

Approved foApecordinJKby Mirjjfifc Recorder (Signature)a ^; . . \

tv.r.x- ^ Vlr"

Minim toid. thow to ttito ogNf* tht lootOoo i on Hw own

Jntt.% PDF MMf mining .md. M

VMvttfwwkpWfMMMff Ofl HP CVWftt Of tfMf

, c'' -y — ^ "ffi i fi r

y??/? 3? ^LILL 77Xxx 77 3X//X 77 o •f 00/X/ 7 •400 o

//X 77 3.S-S/3S90?

s O

/J76703S oo400

0 400 CD 0

Xxfr^7,g ^a.^//S//B 5L/0

//9&Z04-

REUb

' FEB281 197

MININQ LANBS

CektmnTotalt

Ontario wi ildi IU M)nMSchedule for Declaration of Assessment Work on Mining Land

transaction Number (omce UMJ

Co q 7 #ot ea ot*

Mining Claim Number. Or If work was done on other eligible mining land, show In this column the location number Indicated on the claim map.

ya.3i-5"

6

787/oliI&13

w/ST

16

17/B'9(3.0a/2*23

CI&LZO^/o 9 16 60

lo?/ 9 39lil 77 3o"/It 7? 3 / *

lil 77 3^ y

III 7 7 33 'til 77 3^ '

//f 77 35- "

S/3S90? '

//7670/

//76702.1/76703

1/76^04-//?(,-705Ti/-? 6706*

/n(o707^/J7670S

//7^^75)///c5^7?///Q 9*2A.t-/I9G&04-

^07/7

//

RECEIVED^| LARDtH LAKE

MINING DIVISION

FEB 1? 1997.

^

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

1

J

s/t11tfsyts/t //xy

/x'As.dfx

Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land

O

O

0

O

o00

oo0 /

o /o/6

/o

oooG

(O

o/c^:v0o

12, o~}\

Value of work applied to this claim f.

^

*?05

2.40

Boa4-oo

4-GO /

4-oo /4-o/4ôo

/&0&

3904004- OD-f ooQ 00

^-ooôo-4~ oo4~oo

6~c2.^

&OO

ZL/0

/s 600

-f- oo

pnn——— —— PR

.-LM'WNGj.

/A, 07 7

1 — " — "' ' —— " "- '"1 " —— Value of work Bank. Value of work assigned to other l to be distributed

( mining claims 1 at a future dale: *mjiôo XcX/0

s ooooooooo(OGoo

oe*

o

/4c9^/G

o

- ^ /o

oo0

ooaoooo0

o0

ooooo0

o

oo

swsq ——* 8 1997 1

WDS 8RANr-H |"•'•" i J

K, 86 ( 0

FEB 14 '97 12:36 FROM ORC, REftL ESTflTE TO 817055675621 PAGE.001/002

Ministry ofNontwm Developmenttnd Mines

Statement of Cost* for Att6**m*nt Credit

**r (offiai u*ii)

information collected on into form O obtained under the authority of subssotten 6(1) of the Amosment Work BoguhSon Ms. of the Mlnlnfl Act. ths Information la a pubtte record. This Infomuton \M be uoed to rev^ the a*tettm*ffi v^ art OOfflM)

Undersection 8 of the - — -^-. . .. ....----...-... ,.-... —..---..--w.-..-...-.tt* mlniriQ land holder. OoosSta about this ootatothoutt to

, Sttt Roof, 633 Rameey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, F3E 688,

Work Type

ffjpaCPlt eJTlAtA.

3^4PlA&fÂL. C&Jjlt&tx-

totfirtG y b tAfr/m^-Cj ————— , ——————— . . ....j

Unto of Work *Dtpendbu on tbo type of work, M tho numbor

neoee of ond Rnoi iwivbor of MmpiM, o(c.

4i' ^ysi- Ây?C

Aeaociated Cost* (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobHizatton).

ACe^y

(23 ÂfuSt-tT-S}\^ s

Transportation Costs

food and Lodging Costs

RECEIVEDFEB 9 R 1997

MINING LANDS BRANCH

Cost Per Unn ofwork

I2L4.Z9203. 6?

—— S — t-Jj^ e JL 1

in. 41

49, 61

fie?. I X

Total Value of Assessment Work

Total Cost

s: f e**, coZ*f.X-f.

d o .p —b o

^S(?.yir*

5 02-f-s-y

3. iftr.o/'

ô^?. ft 7

Calculations of FtHng Discounts:

1. Work filed within two yeara of performance te claimed at KXWb of the above Total Value of AMeesment Work.2. If work ia filed after two yeara and up to five years after performance, tt can only be claimed at 504b of the Total

Value of Assessment Work, it this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 Total 9 value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditure* claimed In thte statement of costa within 45 days of a request for verification and/or cwecttori/dartflcatton. If verification and/or correctton/dariflcatkwi is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying costa:

l, -———^ c ——— , do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may

reasonably be determined and the coats were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as ffgô/gJ^-'fci /jfpÂjg/^L l am authorized

to make this certification.. tftMt W MM

Signuim

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

May 15, 1997

Roy SpoonerMining Recorder4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, ONP2N 1A2

Ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: Fax:

(705) (705)

670-5853 670-5863

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s): W9780.00106

Submission Number: 2.17098

StatusApproval After Notice

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

NOTE: This correspondence may affect the status of your mining lands. Please contact the Mining Recorder to determine the available options and the status of your claims.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYRon C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands SectionMines and Minerals Division

Correspondence ID: 10828 Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .17098

Date Correspondence Sent: May 15, 1997 Assessor: Steve Beneteau

Transaction First ClaimNumber Number Township(s) l A rea(s) Status Approval Date

W9780.00106 1189221 BRYCE Approval After Notice May 13, 1997

Section:9 Prospecting PROSP

Thank you for your prompt response to the 45 Day Notice dated April 10, 1997. The submitted material has corrected all deficiencies associated with this submission. Accordingly, assessment credit has been approved as outlined on the original Report of Work form accompanying this submission.

Correspondence to: Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Mining Recorder LESLIE E GONDOR Kirkland Lake, ON DOWNSVIEW, Ontario

Resident Geologist Cobalt, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Page: l

Correspondence ID: 10828

TRIM LINE

IC/l 00 01

LU O

OD

uoCDLO i

M9TIOC Of fOnCOTHM iTHJS TOWNfHT ; AREA FALL! WITrtN THE ——

j^^^j*y*!^f^sij^^^,^,,,^,î^l^lîij^ci'^lf1^3iôî^W9,THE MMI UNTT FORESTER FOU TNS AREA CAN BE CONTACTED AT: P.O. BOX 129

SWASTIKA. ONT.TOKITO

GEOLOGY REFERENCE-COBALT

ROBILLARD TWP

VI

Q:I-4UJ Q. O

1190203

1213878

III7742 III774I

1029731 i 1029732.23827

187857 .11*7854f.——TT"——"23620 238Z3/

L

teoasgeJ13886

121387324227 124229

1223524

I2I3B7I1213870-—y--

Bsre.ift5S ' 1212763

M0372 l 9*0371

1212766

13086001193408

12139461 9MM 121394)1 2!11793941 ^-

12139441193409l K

l M12790 —

r *l223306

12133881213934 12025741213943

1212765

THE TOWNSHIP OF

BRYCDISTRICT OF

TIMISKAMI

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH 40 CHAINS

LEGENDPATENTED LAND CROWN LAND SALE LEASESLOCATED LAND LICENSE OF OCCUPATION MINING RIGHTS ONLY SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ROADSIMPROVED ROADS KING'S HIGHWAYS RAILWAYS POWER LINES

'i

o.:3;

CANCELLED ' PATENTED t.R.O.

*C.e

NOTES400* lurfact right* rntrvation along the ihorcs of all lakti and rivers.

AbUrt Q^^tioiiifl

Tuning 8 Surface Rights Reopened to prospecting, sale or lease. Order

O-L-IO/95, previously withdrawn • under Order W 65/83.

Tl E

•f- Tt*.' *- ' *;* . T-- ,\INFORMATION THAT

Al PEARS ON THIS MAP BEEN COMPILED

. ... VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED. THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.

12 II 10 98 76

; CANE TWPi

t

54321

*CMCULATED FIWUAHY M), IM8

FUN NO. M. 282-

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

ON JUNE 01/95

II

Town shipRobillardTownshipB r y ce

4 2 69

1189 222

Geological Legendl 111 Lamprophyre dyke

4f Magnetite ironjormattonThin bedded sediment, Chert, + I- Py

| |3h Feldspar porphyry intrusive*2a Mafic volcanics, fine grained

| |2b Sheared mafic volcanics, Chlorite schist | |2c Mafic volcanics, coarse grained | |2d Pillowed mafic volcanics [ |2f Mafic volcanics, breccia, incl. flow breccia j |2i Massive, diabasic mafic volcanics| |2j Fine grained mafic volcanic!?)

with 5 cm. to 30 cm. felsic 'ovoids'

Symbols and Abbreviations

-cr*TTO — - -

Stream fit beaver dam

Diamond drill hole,analyses in ppb Au/ sample length in m

A AU

Diamond driN hole, location approximatefits, trenchingMineral occurrence, Showing

Bedrock sample analyses; 1 996 work incl. sample fV*

•— ~~'*JU1 Bedrock sample analyses, pre-1996 work (no sample f)' ^ Pillow, pillow with top indicated:.. " * Outcrop—jjr Schistosity, foliation

— Fault, narrow shear zone* Vein: qv -quartz; qc * quartz carbonate

Fe dolonrita. ankerite alteration . ^^^Py Po mt On hem

Pyrite Pyrrhotite Magnetite Galena

Cp. Sph Asp. epid

Chalcopyrite SphaleriteArsenopyritei,epidote* -'

Hematite, specular hematite

2.17098

Prospecting, bedrock sampling by G. Atkins, L.Condor, J. Gore, 81 S. Hohban, 1994 to 1996

Geology 4 compilation by A. W. Beecham 1994 to Jan. 1997

GONDOR-ATKINS CLAIMS

DistrictBryce, Robillard Townships

of Timiskaming Ontario

^|^ — -— - - - ^ j^9 ^ ^ J^n^^taleis**^^- aft. MU^t^^ML^^U^aTprospecting, iivoicigy m UMRnofio

Scale : l 2OOO

Survey By--

Drawn By-' AW-Bttcham

Oat* s

ffatitionv

NTS 4.1-?-*.

note on manual work

Documents