notation for arguments vertical notation: s>t t>u s>u
TRANSCRIPT
Notation for Arguments
Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U
Sequent Notation for Arguments
Sequent Notation:S>T, T>U | S>U
Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U
Sequent Notation for Arguments
Sequent Notation:S>T, T>U | S>U
Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
If R then W, W | R
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
If R then W, W | R
R>W, W | R
Sequent Notation:R>W, W | R
Vertical Notation:R>WWR
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack.. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
Translating Arguments
Which sentence is the conclusion?
Premise Indicators:SinceBecauseFor:
Conclusion Indicators:SoThereforeHenceThusConsequently:
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
P > I
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
WRONG! ‘Because’ Indicates aPREMISE!
P > I
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
Conclusion Premise
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
I, I results in P | P
Conclusion Premise
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
I, I results in P | P
I, I>P | P
Conclusion Premise
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
Conclusion Premise
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
Conclusion Premise
C | E
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
Translating Arguments
Why > is different from |.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
Conclusion PremiseC | E
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
Click here for more