north zone vice chancellors’ meet 2016-17 · 2017-01-16 · association of indian universities...
TRANSCRIPT
Association of Indian Universities
North Zone Vice Chancellors’ Meet 2016-17
CELEBRATING SUCCESS IN
HIGHER EDUCATION-BEST PRACTICES
Hosted by
Amity University Uttar Pradesh (AUUP)
Sector – 125, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, UP - 201313
December 22 – 23, 2016
Report for the first day sessions
10:00am – 11:30am Inaugural Session I2 Moot Court
Dignitaries on Dais:
1. Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla, Vice Chancellor, AUUP; Professor, Entrepreneurship
and Leadership
2. Prof. Furqan Qamar, Secretary General, Association of Indian Universities
3. Guest of Honour, Dr. G. Satheesh Reddy, Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri
4. Dr. Ashok K. Chauhan, Founder President, Amity Education Group and Chairman
AKC Group of Companies
5. Prof. D.S. Chauhan, President, Association of Indian Universities and Vice
Chancellor, GLA University, Mathura
6. Dr. Chanderdeep Tandon, Director, AIB & Programme Coordinator, AIU North
Zone Vice Chancellors’ Meet 2016-17
Welcome address by Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla, Vice Chancellor, AUUP and Professor,
Entrepreneurship and Leadership
The august gathering was addressed by Hon‟ble V C, Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla. She started
by congratulating Dr. Ranbir Singh who had been elected as full time member of Asia and South
Asia for a period of 4 years. She highlighted the various challenges faced by Indian Universities
like developing partnerships, financing higher institutions, lack of gainful employment, lack of
partnership between Academia and Industry.
She laid stress on the fact that India, where Universities like Nalanda and Takshila were an
epitome of higher education, today not even a single Indian University is ranked amongst the top
200. This probably is due to the fact that we, as an institution, imparting knowledge are missing
out on key points of great importance. We need to include programmes that can provide gainful
employment. She highlighted some of the excellent practices that should be followed like
research innovation, leadership development, industry interaction and industry academia
collaboration.
She hoped that this 2 day VCs meet will lead to sharing of best practices as rather than
reinventing the wheel we should learn from one another and these two days should be a learning
for all. She thanked our Visionary Founder President Sir, Dr. Ashok. K. Chauhan for his never-
ending support and guidance.
Address by Prof. Furqan Qamar, Secretary General, Association of Indian Universities
On behalf of Association of Indian Universities (AIU) he thanked Amity University for hosting
North Zone Vice Chancellors‟ Meet 2016-17 on the theme: CELEBRATING SUCCESS IN
HIGHER EDUCATION-BEST PRACTICES. He also thanked 87 Vice-Chancellors from
various central, state, deemed, private universities and institutions which participated in this
meet.
Dr. Qamar, hoped that the deliberations that would follow would lead to a positive change in the
existing scenario. He stressed on the fact, that during such meets we discuss problems and
difficulties faced by us rather than focusing our energies on talking about our accomplishments
and successes. He said people outside India have immense regard as far as what Indian
Universities have accomplished. He laid stress on the fact, that we should document everything
we have achieved till date. Female participation and inclusion of all social and economic groups
is still a daunting task. He focused on the need to create right environment and ecosystem for
education in India.
Dr. Qamar said, though in India number of publications per faculty is much less as compared to
western countries, but we should be proud of the fact that the extent of plagiarism is much less as
compared to many other universities outside India. Impact factor of the papers published per
faculty is also reasonably higher as compared to other countries.
Another very important point mentioned by Dr. Qamar was that 5% of the top Universities
around the world, which is approx. 900 Universities, 35 are Indian Universities. We should
capture and look at the success that we have achieved in Education and not just address the
problems.
Another very important issue addressed was, the understanding of why students of Indian origin
are able to do well abroad rather than in India. This scenario also needs to be discussed and
documented. Support staff in some Universities of International repute is at a ratio of 3:1 (staff:
faculty). These support staff help faculty members in publication, report writing, project writing
etc, and the faculty has enough time to work on other important academic issues.
At the end, Dr. Qamar stressed on creating the right kind of environment for sustainable growth
Lighting of the lamp by all dignitaries on dais followed by chanting of Gayatri Vandana and
Saraswati Vandana.
Formal welcome was conducted by presenting a Tulsi Sapling symbolizing growth and
purity, to the esteemed dignitaries on the dais.
Dr. Ashok K. Chauhan welcomed Dr. G. Satheesh Reddy and Prof. D.S. Chauhan
Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla welcomed founder president Dr. Ashok K. Chauhan
Dr. Chanderdeep Tandon welcomed Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla
Keynote Address by Guest of Honor, Dr. G. Satheesh Reddy, Scientific Advisor to Raksha
Mantri .
Dr. Reddy started by welcoming all the dignitaries on and off the dais. He informed the audience
that he was the first engineer from his village, but today every house has one. Scenario has
changed and 80% of them are employed in great jobs as well as doing well for themselves. He
emphasized on how Indian universities have contributed towards the success of India.
He focused on synergy creation between academic universities and government department
through various mechanisms like grants and project allocations. PSLV, GSLV and chandrayan
are successes owing to the support and collaboration of Academic Institutions. He spoke about
the vision of Late Dr. Abdul Kalam, Hon‟ble President of India. RCI was proposed to have 9
cottages with all facilities for professors and academicians to live and mingle with the scientist.
Proper synergy between academic institutions and R and D is necessary for delivering world
class results. He focused on global trends of universities. He said that universities are slowly
becoming the platform for innovation and research. He talked about startup and innovative
manufacturing centers through need assessment, documentation. He informed the gathering
about technology development fund for students, faculty and institutions with innovative
projects/ ideas that has potential for development.
He emphasized on industry and academia collaboration for research and development. He
pointed 4 major areas (hypersonic cruise vehicles, innovative manufacturing, cyber and space)
where research and development are important for prosperity. He also stated that if India wants
to export products we need to focus on contemporary technology development. He also
suggested that Indian universities should have at least 30% research component. He said in order
to flourish and excel, universities should develop centre for excellence in different departments.
They should also develop and work hard on developing mechanism and strategies for technology
development and enhancement.
Few thoughts by Dr. Ashok K. Chauhan, Founder President, Amity Education Group and
Chairman AKC Group of Companies
Dr. Ashok. K Chauhan spell bound the audience through his motivational speech. He said that
the potential of universities success lies in their Vice- Chancellors. He said confidence is greater
than capabilities. He urged the audience to focus on outcome as everything is futile without it.
Founder President thanked Dr. Furqan Qamar and Dr. D.S Chauhan for giving AUUP the
opportunity to host this meet. He stressed on the fact that Indian brain is unparalleled. Indians
have high intuition and high capability. We should know where we want to reach and work
towards it. In the next 5 years, Amity will have campuses in all Indian states and 50 campuses
overseas.
He told the gathering, that with our Hon‟ble PM‟s leadership we have the capability to make
India a super power. He emphasized on the importance of Universities in nation building and
how he is passionate about taking Amity to greater heights of excellence and success.
Presidential Address by Prof. D.S. Chauhan, President, Association of Indian Universities
and Vice Chancellor, GLA University, Mathura
Dr. D. S. Chauhan started by welcoming all and raised a very pertinent issue that VC post has
gender discrimination and we need to have more female participation in this area. He hoped that
the coming 2 days would be all about success and positivity.
He focused on the problem being faced by Vice-Chancellors like lack of government support,
lack of corporate training to VC. He suggested that Indian universities face certain problems like
absence of alumina record, lack of permanent faculties and crunch of money. In order to focus
more on research faculty needs academic support staff. AIU is a platform where VC can
contribute and raise their concerns. He said that in all foreign universities the strength of Indian
population is very high. The money and intellectual capital is going abroad. This is probably due
to the feeling among students that Indian Degrees do not carry much importance in other
countries.
He also stressed on issues like low salaries of Teachers and the need to have more permanent
teachers in govt. Educational Institutions /Universities.
Finally, Dr. Chauhan summed up by saying that AIU is a platform that will hear all problems and
issues raised by Vice Chancellors.
Release of Special Issue of the University News
The University News special issue was released by the dignitaries on the dais.
Felicitations
Dr. Ashok K Chauhan, Founder President Amity University felicitated Guest of Honor Dr. G.
Satheesh Reddy with a memento
Dr. Balvinder Shukla felicitated Prof. D.S. Chauhan and Prof. Furqan Qamar with a memento
Vote of thanks by Dr. Chanderdeep Tandon, Director, AIB and Programme Co-ordinator,
AIU North Zone VCs’ Meet 2016-17
Dr. Tandon thanked all the sponsors, participants, speakers, on and off dais, dignitaries and
emphasized that the event was made successful through lot of hard work, dedication and constant
support of Hon‟ble Founder President, Chancellor and Vice Chancellor.
National Anthem
The Emcee invited all for tea in the foyer area.
12:00 pm – 1:30 pm Plenary Session – 1:
Fostering Quality through Curriculum
Innovation for Developing Global Talent
F-3 Seminar Hall
Session Chair: Dr. R. C. Sobti, Vice Chancellor, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University,
Lucknow
Dr. Nageshwar Rao, Vice Chancellor, Uttarakhand Open University & Vice Chancellor,
Kumaon University, Nainital
Dr. Y.D.S Arya, Pro Vice Chancellor, Invertis University, Bareilly
The session opened with a presentation by the Hon‟ble session chair Dr. R.C. Sobti, Vice
Chancellor, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow. His presentation was focused
on “Global Talent”.
He emphasized that India is truly a hub of talent and hence there is a need to transform the
Higher Education System and make it globally relevant and competitive. He stated that, “We
cannot live in isolation. We need to have talent which is internationalized.” His presentations
highlighted the following:
Indian v/s American Education System
Indian v/ Japanese Education System
Indian v/s German Education System
In countries like India, teachers do not want to change the traditional pattern of teaching. This is
the biggest issue in development. We must overcome the barriers in identifying the talent at a
global level. “If you behold talent you can go in interdisciplinary study but in India it is not in
trend.”
Further, he talked about determinants of curriculum like education advancements, professional
requirements, MHRD guidelines, societal demands, available resources, social/industrial
progress, and state employment generation policy.
In his presentation, entitled „The impact of innovation curriculum’, he focused on the
following:
Effects and customized learning
Pool of reflexive and thoughtful learners
Graduates with independent and critical thinking skills
Innovation capability & entrepreneurship
Skilled/talented workforce adaptive to the dynamic work environments
He summed up his presentation by highlighting the limitations which are ailing the Indian
education system. He posed the following thought provoking questions:
Since everything is available on the internet so what new thing can be taught?
Are we allowing a child to think in an innovative way?
“Teacher is not a teacher he is a facilitator”
Dr R.C. Sobti had some prior commitments so he requested Dr. Nageshwar Rao, Vice
Chancellor, Uttarakhand Open University & Vice Chancellor, Kumaon University, Nainital
to be the session chair.
Dr. Alka Munjal and Dr. Sanjeev Bansal felicitated Dr. R. C. Sobti
Dr. Y. D. S. Arya, Pro Vice Chancellor, Invertis University, Bareilly ignited the minds on
„Outcome based education system‟.
He explained the relevance of designing the vision and the mission statement. The main aim of
the Indian education system is to contribute at the global level through excellence in scientific
and technical education. Intensive Research is the soul of education that can lead to the
development of innovative minds to serve as a valuable resource for industry and society.
His presentation highlights were as follows:
Question paper should be from simple to complex format.
Innovative things should be added which are not found in traditional papers.
Expectation from a graduate of any discipline
The next presentation was delivered by Dr. Nageshwar Rao, Vice Chancellor, Uttarakhand Open
University & Vice Chancellor, Kumaon university, Nainital. He focused on „Fostering Quality
through curricula Development in Higher Education’.
The following key aspects were discussed:
The Curriculum needs to integrate the knowledge, skills and Values.
The Curriculum development should capitalize on teaching, Research (analytical and
probing skills) and Extension Activities.
Curriculum and Development: Measure to Equitable Access to Quality Education.
He also discussed various strategies for fostering quality through curriculum development. These
are given below
Involvement of faculty
Strengthen learner support system
Regular and structured feedback and cooperative learning
Steering curriculum committees
Intensive use of OERS.
Curriculum should provide flexibility
Curriculum should integrate problem solving and logical reasoning approach.
Curriculum should foster learning ability.
Real life case studies need to be incorporated
Pedagogy review inclines with creativity, innovation and global curriculum reforms.
Curricula should be purposive and clearly focused on the planned learning outcomes.
Further he also discussed the key issues that impact the curricula development revisions.
The Plenary Session- I was concluded by Dr. Nageshwar Rao. The forum was made open for
discussion post lunch in order to maintain and adhere to the schedule.
Dr. Nageshwar Rao was felicitated by Dr. Abha Singh and Dr. Sujata Khandai. Dr Y.D.S.
Arya was felicitated by Dr Sanjeev Bansal and Dr Chanderdeep Tandon, bringing a
successful close to the intellectually stimulating Plenary Session – I.
02:15 pm- 03:50 pm Technical Session – 1a:
Best Practices in the Use of ICT for Promoting
Flexibility in Higher Education – Challenges and
Strategies.
F-3 Seminar Hall
The session commenced by greeting the session chair, speakers and the delegates to this post
lunch session by the master of the ceremony. The eminent speakers for the session were
Session Chair: Prof. P.B Sharma, Vice Chancellor Amity University, Haryana
Prof. Dinesh Kumar, Vice Chancellor, YMCA , University of Science and Technology,
Faridabad,
Prof. K. K. Bhutani, Director NIPER, Mohali and
Prof. Vijay Gupta Vice Chancellor Sharada University Greater Noida.
In his opening remarks, the session chair Prof. P.B Sharma, Vice Chancellor Amity University,
Haryana enlightened the audience on the importance of ICT. He laid stress on the fact that
quality of students is going down and we need to impart quality education. He emphasized on the
flexibility of learning, effectiveness of learning and enhancing capabilities to learn better through
ICT. Highlighting the issues about curriculum design and delivery, he proposed the agenda for
the discussion. The session chair expressed his concern that providing quality education at
University level and ensuring availability of vital facilities is a major challenge being faced and
needs to be addressed at all levels. He said that we need to move towards team teaching where
experts from industry, Alumni, teachers all should work and impart lectures, rather following
older ways of single faculty classroom session delivery.
Prof. Dinesh Kumar, Vice Chancellor, YMCA
Prof. Kumar introduced 360 degree feedback which focuses on continuous improvement by
incorporating all stakeholders‟ perspective.
During his address he emphasized on evaluating the usefulness of the tools for effective
administration. The crux of his deliberation was to spend on pocket friendly tools. Introducing
his University to the audience, by way of a presentation he discussed the 360 degree feedback
ie., feedback from all stakeholders: students, faculty, parent, peers, industry experts and teachers
being collected in his University. He talked about a Grievance Portal for students where students
can share their feedback with regard to any issue that had been introduced in his organization to
promote the use of ICT. The university has introduced an online feedback system that has
worked very well. Student feedback for instance is taken both student wise and program wise.
Exit survey from students is also taken where a large amount of data is analysed. This data helps
in identifying problems including grievances. These are later worked out at various levels.
The session chair raised a concern that action points and agenda items should also be populated
from the data generated through feedbacks. Prof. Dinesh Sharma concluded his address with
discussion on Innovative practices that included social, technical and administrative initiatives.
Prof. K.K. Bhutani, Director National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER)
He talked about Pharmacy Education and Industrial Pharma in India. He gave an overview of
NIPER and its programmes. Dr. Bhutani started by addressing the fact that there is less
uniformity in pharmacy education and the syllabus in this programme needs much modification
and improvement. He said that the sector has grown mostly in generic medicines. He emphasized
on India‟s pharmaceutical evolution, the golden period and the growth of pharmaceutical
industry along with the required Industrial linkages of higher pharmaceutical education. He
expressed his concern with regard to discovery of new drugs and the challenges faced in terms of
extensive research and funds. Most of the pharmacy colleges were govt. funded but today many
private players have risen in this area. He emphasized that India still needs to go a long way
before we can launch a new drug into the market. But, was happy that research is going on in the
field of TB, Malaria and HIV. He said that time has come when the pharma industry should also
give importance to translational research rather than working in isolation, if we want India to
excel in the area of new drug discovery.
Talking about the drawbacks of the Herbal drugs, the speaker mentioned that herbal formulations
are not standardized and the concentration of active constituent in these formulations is not
constant. The method of standardization of herbal formulation and guidelines should also be
regulated. The discussion on herbal and modern medicine caught the interest of the august
gathering and paved a way for an interesting, interactive session.
With his remark “Discover the treasure; it is in nature”, the chair then invited the next worthy
speaker
Prof. Vijay Gupta, Vice Chancellor Sharada University, Greater Noida.
Prof. Gupta discussed about the initiatives taken by him at Sharda University. He said the use
and implementation of technology is of any use only when the faculty knows how to bring about
its best use. He spoke about various ICT enabled systems at the university such as individual
laptops for undergraduate students, adoption of Learning Management System (LMS), app based
attendance system and web based progress monitoring system.
LMS has revolutionised the system as Sharada as it is used for posting all notifications, study
materials, quizzes, and forums including evaluations. Students use LMS extensively. He said that
the university has also introduced App based attendance system. It is very user friendly where
the registered students present in a class are verified just by switching the wifi mode on their
smart phones. They have also introduced tracking systems for course delivery. It has helped to
track the delivery of each module in a class for each subject.
Discussing the benefits of web based monitoring systems Prof. Gupta emphasized that freedom
and accountability must go hand in hand. The session was much appreciated.
Prof. P B Sharma, the chair of the session thanked all the worthy speakers and concluded that
Universities of today and tomorrow must put ICT in the front end for both governance and
teaching. The outcome of the session was that great days are ahead for enhancing the learning
and flexibility of learning through proper use of ICT. The effective utilization of ICT can be
realized by making wise use of every single minute. In the end of session, the esteemed panelists
were felicitated with a token of appreciation and gratitude.
02:15 pm– 03:50 pm Technical Session – 1b:
Mind to Market:
Research, Innovation, IPR and Technology
Transfer in Higher Education – Best Practices
F-1 Seminar Hall
Session Chair: Lt Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah, Vice Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University,
Aligarh.
Dr. Sheel Nuna, director, South Asia, Queensland University, Australia
Dr. W. Selvamurthy, President, ASTIF, DG, ADSI, Amity University U.P
Dr. Apoorv Sharma, President and Co-Founder, Venture Catalysts Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Dr. Neeraj Sharma, advisor and head technology development and transfer and policy
research cell department of science and technology, Ministry of Science and Technology
Dr. S. Rajarajan, Vice Chancellor, SRM University
The session started with the talk by Session Chair, Lt. Gen. Zamaer -ud-din Shah, VC, Aligarh
Muslim University.
Lt Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah, Vice Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.
Lt Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah discussed about the quality of research. He stated that “necessity is
the mother of invention”, without it there is no point of research. He thinks that the teacher must
have burning passion on research and we have to find a way to light a fire and promote it. He has
experienced that by giving promotions as incentives, researchers are encouraged to get into
research and perform better. This strategy resulted in rise of registration of PhD scholars at
AMU. He focused on the points which we need to concentrate in our innovation which includes
scarcity of food, water and energy. AMU is working on water purification of Ganga and
Yamuna. He discussed about the ongoing innovative researches on nano-material and gave an
example of using nano-material to improve food material and fertilizers. He said it‟s the time for
Nano revolution. And they observed that the plant grow three times more when treated with
nano-materials. He highlighted the problems faced by farmers to store the produce for a long
time.
According to him, our government needs to protect the IPR of researchers for the safe transfer of
innovations to commercial scale. We have to lay stress on research that can help mankind. He
stated that research is vital and stated that „Publish or Perish‟ should be replaced by „Invent or
Perish‟.
Dr. Sheel Nuna, director, South Asia, Queensland University, Australia
Dr Sheel Nuna presented his views and ideas on research & innovation and spoke about unity
between research innovation and commercialization. According to him, innovators should target
the research. Mostly he found that researchers have been asking the questions regarding their
doubt on taking next step. Young researchers have understood the importance of IPR and are
filing more patents. He highlighted the challenges faced by researchers to align and focus their
research. He focused on the key priorities for QUT which are secured environment, better health
for all, sustainable agriculture and bio-energy, smart cities. Lot of emphasis should be given to
IPR. Queensland University have set a company within University that looks at all the
parameters of commercialization at University scale. The main fields to be worked on are
research and its commercialization. He also agreed with what Lt. Gen. Zameer Uddin shah said
about the IPR. He further discussed about the organization of QUT Blue Box which is a
commercialization company. He feels that international research collaboration is required.
Dr. W. Selvamurthy, President, ASTIF, DG, ADSI, Amity University U.P, Noida
Dr W Selvamurthy discussed about the innovation model of Amity and technology transfer in
higher education. He talked about the ideal university which is built with the cooperation of high
quality teaching, research and innovation. He focused on the exponential growth of India on
education which states that approximately 1 out of every 4 graduate in the world will be Indian
in 2030. Hence there is a great responsibility on research and innovation and we should focus on
it.
The focus should be on the university rather than institutions and government labs as universities
are full of young innovators, have flexible ecosystem and the process of knowledge exchange
and transfer. He emphasized that Amity University model which comprises of research,
innovation and technology transfer plays a major role in creating innovation ecosystem.
Translation of knowledge is very important. We need necessary infrastructure for carrying out
desired innovation. He expressed the need for organized IPR cell and innovation incubator which
has ensured many successful patents, commercialized products and new start-ups at Amity
University. He also highlighted the contribution of Amity University in research and innovations
in present scenario like LPG sensors, herbal mosquito repellent formulations and biodegradable
plastics.
Dr. Apoorv Sharma, President and Co-Founder, Venture Catalysts Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Dr Apoorva Sharma discussed about the commercialization and the deep impact of the university
administration in establishing successful start-ups. He spoke about the great innovation driven
culture that Amity University inculcates. Google, IDL and other great corporate are the end
result of successful start ups.
He talked about the innovation incubators which can boost research and help in promoting
innovation. He highlighted the role of partnerships between universities/ academia and industry
which can lead to successful start-ups and business. By giving example of Google which was
started by Stanford University students and later sold at a gain of $336 million.
He focused on the incubation industry which holds 120 incubators and 40 accelerators. He
focused on the start up of Indian economy like Unicon, Flipkart, Snapdeal and Ola.
He said that without high risk there cannot be high return. Finally he asked the audience that
whether we are ready for innovation and commercialization?
Dr. Neeraj Sharma, advisor and head technology development and transfer and policy
research cell department of science and technology, Ministry of Science and Technology
Dr. Neeraj Sharma agreed with Dr. Apoorv Sharma that the starts up of companies are started
from new ideas. According to his perception major roles are played by building science
technology and innovation capacity and capability. He said that all research would fructify and
give desired result in 10 years and that no research carried out ever goes waste.
He talked about the fact that 75-80% of funds for research and innovation is funded by the
government and we need to encourage the private sector to participate and invest in science and
technology.
He shared lots of facts and figures with the audience on the S and T scenario of our country.
0.88% is the total GDP spent on R and D in the year 2011 which may have been raised to 0.91%
in this fiscal year. India is ranked 9th in full time registered researchers and Ph.D Scholars where
around 2 lakh scholars are full time registered with Indian University. India is 6th
in
publication/year where around 1 lakh papers and journals are published. We are 10th
in the world
to file for US patent.30% scientists awarded grants under extramural grant scheme are women.
India has one of the top biotech capabilities.
He also raised some challenges faced. First was the hope that research spending would hopefully
be increased to 2% of the GDP, out of which 50% would be funded by private industry and 50%
by the government. He said MSME and SME should also participate.
Government plays a major role in growth of research and development funding and used to
collaborate with private sector and private investments. He focused on STI policies and DST
website and talked about the new challenges regarding science and technology innovations. The
other focus areas that S and T are funding are Make in India, Swatch Bharat, Start up India.
Dr. S. Rajarajan, Vice Chancellor, SRM University
Dr. S. Rajarajan stressed on the position of the country in the world describing innovations from
India and wanted to share some of the best practices worked upon by his university.
He emphasized on the importance of research, socially relevant topics and Industrial relevance
He said that one of the benchmark in rating a university is by the number of Nobel laureates the
University has produced. In India we have produced only 5 Nobel scholars as compared to Korea
that has 25. He said that the focus of research should be problem solving. We need to work on
relevant societal topics like drug for Dengue, or Chickungunia. Patience is very important to R
and D. Screening of PhD enrollment is necessary. It is not about just getting a degree. Identifying
students with real talent and devotion is important.
According to him a research should be multi-disciplinary and universities should ensure relevant
experts are connected which can ensure better research outcomes. He stated that patience is
required during research which a good researcher should develop and talented students with
good observational power should be nurtured. There are no boundaries in research and it has to
be at a global level. Collaboration is important at both national and international level.
Technology has helped people work faster and PhD can now be completed in 3-4 years rather
than 5 years. He also stressed on the fact that if a research has IPR possibility, than the researcher
should refrain from publishing his findings and go first for filing the patent.
Our innovations should be patented first and then published. Lastly he stated that our innovations
needed to be recognized globally.
The session ended with presenting the speakers with Tulsi sapling and mementos.
04:00 pm– 05:30 pm Plenary Session – 2:
Best Practices in Industry Academic
Collaborations
F-3 Seminar Hall
Session Chair: Mr Paramjit Jaswal, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law
Prof. D.V.Rai, VC, Shobhit University, Meerut
Dr. Rajesh Kher, Head Outsourcing partnership Management, IDHAR, Jansen R&D
Noida
Prof. Ram Chandra, VC, Monad University Hapur
Mr. S.R. Soni, VP, India Glycols Ltd
Prof. Atul Khosla, Pro VC, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences
Mr. Arvind Pacchapur, South Asia Head, Clarivate Analytics
Mr Paramjit Jaswal, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law
The session commenced with the felicitation of session chair Mr Paramjit Jaswal. Mr. Jaswal
felicitated all the panel members with Tulsi sapling and declared the session open with opening
remarked that the need of hour is to have a practical approach in teaching rather than just
theoretical teaching. This can happen only with increased Industry Academic interactions and
collaborations.
Prof D.V.Rai, VC, Shobhit University, Meerut
Dr. Rai started by Thanking the chair for giving him the opportunity to present his views. He
said that Universities in rural set up face more challenges than urban ones because of low
students enrollment as well as monetary constraint. He said innovation is pertinent. Industry
should support research as more industry academia partnership is needed. University has to
improve on the following qualities: excellence, modernization, collaborations and self reliance. 3
targets which according to Dr. Rai were of great pertinence were:
Knowledge, development and growth
Quality and democratic development
Linking industry as a partner in research, infrastructure development and support services
He said benefit of academia is benefit of industry as one cannot work without another
Prof. Rai discussed the present scenario of universities emphasizing on development of
infrastructure and globalization of innovations. He discussed the elements to improve quality
through- excellence, modernization, collaboration and self reliance. He talked about Targets for
collaboration, knowledge development and growth, quality education and democratic
development.
He also discussed types of links between academia and Industry through research partnerships,
research service and shared infrastructure. He concluded his talk by emphasizing the significance
of industry-Academia collaboration through skill.
Dr Rajesh Kher, Head Outsourcing partnership Management, IDHAR, Jansen R&D
Noida
Dr. Kher started by saying that Prof. Rai has covered most of the points and issues. He said
Academia plays a vital role in pharma development but there may be some road blocks towards
collaboration. Collaboration between Industry and Academia should be innovation driven.
Patients need innovative medicines. Today we have IT, Big data and Cloud to help us in getting
patient data to understand the need in pharma sector. Translational research will lead to better
drugs. Holistic approach is the need of the hour. Better interdisciplinary research leads to faster
discovery. Pharma giants like Merck and GSK spend more than $ 1.5 billion and it takes15-20
years to get a drug into the market. However, having better collaboration we can reduce this time
leading to faster output. Drugs for cancer, arthritis are costly and beyond the reach of so many
people. These areas should be looked into.
He also discussed the challenges in academic-pharma collaborations – and emphasized that lack
of business acumen in academic researchers, distrust between pharma industries and researchers
and also non availability of universal template or guidelines for collaborations are the major
roadblocks in collaborations.
Prof. Ram Chandra, VC, Monad University Hapur
Discussing the current scenario of universities Prof. Chandra stated that the gap between
industries- and academia is because the universities are not producing industry specific man-
power, students have bookish knowledge and there is a gap between demand and supply. He
stated that there is a strong need to develop teachers training programs in universities,
development of good and specific credit system and reformation of examination. Students are
now going for job oriented courses rather than opting for basic courses. We need more trained
teachers to cater to such high student population.
Mr. S.R. Soni, VP, India Glycols Ltd
Mr. Soni presented the case study of 2G Ethanol Demonstration Plant. He showed a movie on
how academia and industry together with the help of government agency BIRAC developed a 2G
Ethanol Demonstration Plant in Kashipur. He mentioned that researchers from DBT-ICT-Centre
for Energy Biosciences, developed protocol for producing alcohol from lignocelluloses, BIRAC-
played as interface agency and India Glycol Kashipur, established a 2G Ethanol Demonstration
Plant.
Prof. Atul Khosla, Pro VC, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences
Prof Khosla discussed Industry-Academia Alliances. He mentioned that industry academia
alliances fail because of lack of research opportunities and gap between industry and academia.
He shared five key learning‟s from his experience for making alliances work – initiate few but
deeper alliances, be specific in program structure, have clear team structure with appropriate
trainings, maintain focus and build partner company profile and brand image of the university.
He also discussed the Genpact- Shoolini partnership and shared his experiences.
Mr. Arvind Pacchapur, South Asia Head, Clarivate Analytics
Mr. Pacchapur discussed innovation drivers for building industry-academia collaboration, and
stakeholders in research and innovation. He discussed the global scenario of Industry
collaborations showing graphs and numbers and pointed out that India lacks in Pharma and
toxicology which are the major industries abroad. The graphs of innovation output depicted that
Machinery, Digital Computation, Transportation and Construction and Mining are the current
trends that are growing. He concluded his talk saying India can have great results if it develops
high research capabilities, infrastructure and culture; focus on area of interest and senior leaders
give explicit support.
The Chair of the session concluded the session by congratulating all the panel members on their
expertise and knowledge sharing. A few questions were asked on development of industry-
Academia collaboration. The session was closed by felicitation of all the panel members.
Report for the Second day sessions
Following Panelists were present for the session:
Session Chair - Prof. (Dr.) J.N. Kaul – Vice Chancellor, HNBGU University, Srinagar
Prof. (Dr.) Mehraj Uddin Mir – Vice Chancellor, Central University of Kashmir, Srinagar
Prof. (Dr.) Gurmohan Singh Walia – Vice Chancellor, Sri Guru Granth Sahib
World University, Punjab.
Prof. (Dr.) R.S Grewal – Vice Chancellor, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh
Prof. (Dr.) P.B. Sharma – Vice Chancellor, Amity University, Haryana.
Prof. (Dr.) Sanjay Srivastava – Vice Chancellor, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad.
Prof J.N Kaul started the session by addressing the gathering and outlining that India will have
to outshine in terms of providing research based and entrepreneurship based education system.
However he also mentioned that there are certain contradictions in achievement of higher
education excellence in terms of availability of trained teachers, resources, employability of
students and upgradation of curriculum. He said that there is much emphasis on technology in
higher education institutions but there are its counter effects too. The jobs created through new
technology are high end jobs and require specialized skill sets. He emphasized that in the
existing scenario we are not ready for that and we need to work on the resources available to the
academia. He also shared there is not much autonomy available to the Vice Chancellor‟s in
Indian Universities when it comes to decision on resource allocation. He also emphasized that
Vice Chancellor‟s should be given autonomy along with accountability.
Prof. Mehraj Uddin Mir underscored that India did not figure in first 200 Universities of the
world and stressed that Higher Education Institutions need to focus on Technology, Tolerance
and Talent. He also emphasized that the quality of research should be improved. The HRD report
09:30 am– 10:45 am Technical Session – 2a:
Developing Organization Culture & Values for
Change through Professional Development of
Academic Leadership –Best Practices.
F-3 Seminar Hall
and NAAC team made observations that higher education institutions need to improve on the
quality of research and consultancy. He also flagged that Teachers are at the Centre stage of any
academic model and their welfare aspects should be taken care of. The basic mandate of
Academic policy should be research and innovation oriented.
Prof. (Dr.) Gurmohan Singh Walia, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Punjab.
talked about the tenets of the Book –Being Vice Chancellor asking for the trouble. He talked of
depending on our own values system rather than following the western culture to be a developed
nation. He mentioned that there is a need to recognize and celebrate the talent in Indian
Universities. We need to recognize our student and teachers who are performing well and reward
them on the basis of their merit. He also stressed that we need to learn discipline and
institutionalization from our western counterparts , stop the culture of criticism and honor the
experience embedded in faculties, value professional development and target student retention
and learning.
Prof. (Dr.) R.S Grewal talked about the culture, imperatives to create culture and best practices
at Chitkara University. We need to come up with definitive aim, vision and mission. He said that
unless and until we change the outlook, things will not change. Culture is the personality of the
organization which needs to be shared widely amongst all employees of the institution. He said
that for culture to embed in higher education institutions, it needs to be defined (put into writing),
lived (implemented) , measured (measured by making cultural elements a reality) and rewarded.
Our pedagogy should be learning centric rather than teaching or exam centric. We should be
more liberal in our teaching methodologies and go beyond curriculum. He said it was also
important to identify and work upon the cultural gaps. Persistence to mend is the key and also
allow culture to evolve. He said that at Chitkara there is an emphasis on acquisition of
knowledge and not just degrees. They believe in the model of liberal education i.e beyond
curriculum and encourage research and innovation. They also rely on bloom‟s taxonomy and
project assisted learning and emphasis on courses through MOOC‟s.
Prof. (Dr.) P.B. Sharma focused on the need to develop a culture of nurturing talent , culture of
collaboration, culture of synergy, culture of skills and a culture of collaboration and partnership.
Quality is a matter of critical importance in imparting education in universities. He said that
Quality, Relevance and Eminence are hallmarks of Indian Universities and there are many
Higher Education Indian Institutions such as IIT‟s which are a hallmark of Indian Education
System. He said that there needs to be a vital shift from mediocrity to meritocracy. Finally, Dr.
Sharma summed up by saying that we need to reform ourselves to increase our visibility and
make India an educational hub.
Prof. (Dr.) Sanjay Srivastava highlighted two critical factors that his University emphasizes on
which were employability index of students and communication gym for faculty and students at
different levels.
09:30 am– 10:45am Technical Session – 2b:
Accreditation, Rankings & Benchmarking in
Higher Education – Leadership Challenges &
Strategies.
F-1 Seminar Hall
Session Chair: Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla, Vice Chancellor and Professor,
Entrepreneurship and Leadership, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
Mr. Shekhar Sanyal, Country Head IET – India
Dr. Ashok Kumar Raghav, Vice Chancellor, AP Goel Shimla University
Ms. Anamika Chaurasia, Head – Professional Service at Clarivate Analytics
Mr. Nishit Jain, Special Advisor, Asia - EFMD
Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla, Vice Chancellor and Professor, Entrepreneurship and
Leadership, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
The session started with the talk by Session Chair, Prof. (Dr.) Balvinder Shukla. At the outset,
she thanked all for being there on a nice cold morning. She said that the topic was chosen
keeping in view the importance of ranking in today‟s scenario. She said that today the
universities are not just serving the needs locally but are producing global talent. Indians are
contributing immensely to this global scenario and hence we need to produce graduates of high
standards.
She talked about how much importance was given to accreditations and benchmarking, about
credit transfers to the Universities in UK and the challenges that Amity University PGDM
students faced while applying to foreign universities for higher education and for jobs in foreign
countries. She informed gathering that after acquiring various accreditations, Amity education
systems have significantly improved. It helped Amity to get its policy, guidelines and systems in
place. She spoke about the introduction of uniform course coding that was introduced in the
university during QS accreditation. Most of the accreditation bodies have a student centered
approach where the stress is laid on progressive teaching and learning curve, rather than the end
result only. This has changed the approach of the universities as well. By having a defined
process, assessment and analysis of the learning outcomes thereby focusing on student progress
and success and stakeholder satisfaction. Ranking and benchmarking is important for greater
visibility among peers and industry. Today, she said that students from all around the country
apply for admissions at Amity.
She highlighted that the way ahead to get international accreditation is through identifying the
gaps that exist and filling them up. The strategy is to document all academic activities and
maintain record of all important data. She emphasised on the fact that ranking and benchmarking
is very important and shapes the framework of the institution.
Mr. Shekhar Sanyal, Country Head IET – India
Mr. Sanyal started his session by introducing IET to the forum stating that it is the top 5
technical publishers in the world. The aim of his organization is to help make the world a better
place through engineering. He said that today, the challenge is to produce world class engineers.
80% of students coming out of class 12th
hope to become engineers in India as compared to 20-
30% in other countries. Hence we are catering to the needs and aspirations of a lot of students.
We need to innovate and improve on problem solving and analytical thinking and approach. He
highlighted that there is a huge talent pool of engineers in India and that quality of engineering
education has to be given utmost importance. He also talked about planning a 2 day workshop
regarding changes, paper work and importance to accelerate the accreditation process and to
educate the 2nd
tier of academicians who would be taking up this uphill task in a university set
up.
Dr. Ashok Kumar Raghav, Vice Chancellor, AP Goel Shimla University
Dr. Raghav talked about functions that should be performed by the universities. He spoke about
the challenges faced such as cost, limited resources for research and high resistance to change
and he lay stress on rankings and the importance of it for all universities. He said ranking and
benchmarking systems are being used to acquire accreditations. He provided statistics of the
Indian scenario as per other world class university. He emphasized on the NIRF, NAAC and
NBA rankings and accreditation system
Ms. Anamika Chaurasia, Head – Professional Service at Clarivate Analytics.
Ms. Anamika Chaurasia started by talking about the impact of research on institutional ranking.
She emphasized that the areas of improvement in research should be identified and abridged. She
talked about fostering a culture for quality research as research contributes a total of 30% to the
accreditation framework. Indian university should aim at published high quality research in
highly cited journals as it imparts far greater visibility in the scientific world. She laid emphasis
on the fact that global ranking take the research output, patents and consultancy projects into
account while benchmarking a university. To reach to the top it is prerequisite that we do quality
work and publish quality journals. For this, universities should plan strategically, play to its
strength and foster research culture. She spoke about benchmarking, collaborations with
institutes and identification of top journals for publication purposes to enhance quality research.
Mr. Nishit Jain, Special Advisor, Asia - EFMD
Mr. Nishit Jain talked about EFMD, a global enabler in management space. It is highly
accredited and he spoke about creating an interface between academic space and corporate space
through accreditation. He spoke about research driven innovation and the degree of autonomy
that an institute enjoys after accreditation. He heavily laid emphasis on four pillars – respect for
diversity, responsible management, international dimension and corporate connections.
The hon‟ble chair thanked the speakers and the forum. The session ended with presenting the
speakers with Tulsi sapling and mementoes.
10:45 am– 12:00 pm Technical Session – 3a:
Governance and Financing Higher Education
F-3 Seminar Hall
Session Chair: Prof. Furqan Qamar, Secretary General, Association of Indian Universities
Prof. H.L. Verma, Vice Chancellor, Jagan Nath University, Bahadurgarh, Haryana
Prof. Mushahid Hussain, Vice Chancellor, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly
Prof. (Dr.) Raj Singh, Vice Chancellor, Rayat-Bahra University, Mohali, Punjab
Lt Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah, Vice Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
Prof. Furqan Qamar, Secretary General, Association of Indian universities
Prof. Furqan Qamar welcomed all the distinguished speakers of the session, other distinguished
Vice Chancellors / Directors of various Institutions participating in the session and all other
attendees of the session. Prof. Furqan invited speakers for presenting their viewpoints on
Governance and Financing issues in Higher Education.
Prof. H.L. Verma, Vice Chancellor, Jagan Nath University, Bahadurgarh, Haryana
Professor Verma, a specialist in the field of finance, started the session by saying that
“Everything starts with money and ends with money”. According to him, in a changed scenario it
is expected from every Vice Chancellor to have some knowledge of finance along with other
academics. In the university system, not much innovation has taken place so far as the financial
management task practice is concerned. In the case of public sector, Government aid acts as a
source of finance. On the other hand, in case of private sector, it is the student fee which majorly
contributes to the source of fund. He gave an example of a particular university in New York and
its financial structure. That university finances itself by preparing a budget which consists of four
parts : first 25% is financed through student‟s fees, next 25% is financed through Government
since it is a state university, next 25% is financed through faculty by undertaking research
projects thereby generating money and the final 25% is financed through Vice Chancellor,
president and the administration. The conclusion from above point is that a country like USA
which has a higher per capita income spends just 25% of its income on the education and rest is
generated through other sources. In case of self-financing institutions, the financial burden of
100% cost plus profits is transferred to the students. Keeping in mind the socio-economic
conditions in India, This is not sustainable. In the long run, there is question of affordability for
the middle class. Therefore, we need to find alternative sources of funding and not just rely on
students‟ fees. Adequate finance is must for growth and for providing quality education to
achieve our objectives.
Distinguishing between objectives of education and higher education, he said that the objective
of education is to empower a person against ignorance and the objective of higher education is to
promote skills and is based on a person‟s choice. Benefits of higher education are more to
individuals than to society. Therefore it needs to be self-financing. Also, the main focus should
be to innovate alternative ways to generate funds for which extensive research is required.
Prof. Mushahid Hussain, Vice Chancellor, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly
The speaker first talked about financing structure in his university. This university is financed
through students‟ fees, examination fees and also, they encourage their faculty members to bring
projects under various schemes. The second aspect is governance which is through e-governance
system in their university. E-governance is applied in case of registration, examination etc. In
general, one of the important aspects is finance and the other is research. The state government is
not providing enough funds and grants to carry out the research work. Now a days, most of the
projects undertaken by the students are based on extensive computerization, simulation and
modelling. This is mainly because well-developed laboratories are lacking in schools and
universities. The speaker concluded by emphasizing on having well developed laboratory
system.
Prof. (Dr.) Raj Singh, Vice Chancellor, Rayat-Bahra University, Mohali, Punjab
The speaker commented on our current education system by saying that the “glorious past has
been lost”. He stated that the gross enrolment ratio from 1992 to 2016 has been increasing and
will be close to global average within next few years. He pointed out a challenge that there is a
need for more private institutions offering higher education since today only 60% of private
institutions are providing higher education. Another challenge is that the universities where there
is majority of engineering students, banks are running away from funding those institutions.. He
gave four suggestions. Firstly, CSR money which has come from many big industries has
worked in some cases and not in others because owners had 100% control over the money and
there were no delegations. Secondly, we need to look at innovative ways of financing. Thirdly,
he strongly recommended that government should disinvest and the surplus land should be sold
to private universities and should stop giving subsidies. Fourthly, most of the universities should
reduce their overhead expenses. He concluded by focusing on two aspects -learning outcome
based education and e-governance.
Lt Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah, Vice Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
The speaker made a mention of the saying, “money makes the mayor go”. He said that
governance is totally dictated by funds. The motive of higher education is social service from
perspective of public institutions and profit making from the perspective of private institutions.
Over the time, there has been an increase in the overhead cost in creating infrastructure,
increased water and electricity charges and hike in teacher‟s salary but government support will
keep decreasing over time in this regard. Poverty will have to be shared by private university.
We have to search for other ways and means of financing higher education. Two ways through
which the universities can raise their own resources are: by getting rid of surplus land holdings
and bank on the alumni. There is a need to tighten the belt.
Concluding Remarks by Prof. Furqan Qamar:
He thanked all the distinguished speakers for their valuable inputs. Concluding the session, he
said that all agree on one point that funding is very important. Cost effectiveness is important
and despite constraints, Universities are somehow managing for funds, growing and tapping
newer sources of finance. He put emphasis on four aspects: Regulation, Funding, Administration
and Financing. All these are linked together. Currently Private Universities are managing funds
directly from the students and Public universities indirectly from people through taxes. He
pointed out towards plethora of regulators especially since 1987 and concluded that too much
regulation is an obstacle rather than a tool for promoting excellence. There are three important
challenges in respect of higher education-expansion, inclusion and excellence. Inclusion should
not be compromised in any case since education and higher education are very important for
national development. He also mentioned recommendations of few commissions/Committees
appointed at various times including Radha Krishnan Commission 1948, Kothari commission
1968 and said that currently our spending on education is not enough. At least 6% of GDP
should be devoted to education to be shared equally by Primary, Secondary and Higher
education.
The meeting ended with A Vote of Thanks to the House by the Chair and presenting sapling and
memento to all the speakers.
10:45 am – 12:00 am Technical Session – 3b:
Developing Synergy – Collaboration, Co-
operation and Partnership in Higher Education
F-1 Seminar Hall
Session Chair: Prof. R.K. Chauhan, Vice Chancellor, Lingaya’s University, Faridabad
Prof. Gurinder Singh, group Vice Chancellor, Amity University
Prof. Rupamanjari Ghosh, Vice Chancellor, Shiv Nadar University, U.P.
Shri Apoorv Mahendru, Director, German Academic Exchange Service
Shri Raju Vaziraney, President, Som Distilleries & Breweries Ltd.
The session commenced with Chair of the session Prof. Chauhan‟s introduction to the topic,
stating the importance of collaboration in higher education. Before inviting the speakers to
deliver speeches, he raised a few doubts regarding collaboration occurring more outside the
country than within, how synergy is more on paper and are yet to touch practical periphery, and
how there should be more cooperation among the Indian Universities.
The Session Chair welcomed panelists.
Prof. Gurinder Singh, group Vice Chancellor, Amity University
The first speaker Dr. Gurinder Singh shared his experience citing examples of an Indian student
pursuing quality research in Nectar Lab, Australia. Based on this anecdote he raised a few
questions stating that despite India being the largest customers, vast populated country, and a
reservoir of talent among students as well as academicians, why there is such dearth of quality
research in India.
He enhanced that 11% of the new age CEOs are of Indian origin. 19% of the students going to
Ivy League institution are Indians. Top students of the world are nurtured by Indian
academicians. Yet there is no quality research and development in India. He stated that there is
an obvious gap between demand and supply.
He mentioned that since the idea and role of classroom and teaching is changing, it is important
for the academia to concentrate more on promotion of effective research.
He raised two important questions. First, that we need the best ambience for our students to
receive maximum output from their talent. Why aren‟t we given this environment and resources?
Second, why students are not allowed to do their own research during their academic
framework? Students outside India are provided with a full semester to produce their research on
the desired topics whereas in India no such thing is provided.
He concluded by saying that Academic Institutions need not create degrees and classrooms, but
should nurture experiential learning and this would not be possible without collaboration.
Prof. Rupamanjari Ghosh, Vice Chancellor, Shiv Nadar University, U.P.
The second speaker Dr. Rupamanjari Ghosh initiated her speech by stressing that it is important
to speak about solutions more than the problems.
According to her, it is highly essential to get synergy in curriculum and research. And to achieve
those involvements of the educational institutions should be –
a) Targeted – in terms of matching philosophy between institutions
b) Engaging – in terms of involvement in research collaboration
c) Flexible – in terms of self-divineness and incentives for faculty and students
According to her, government institutions do not take the risks because they are funded by the
central government and have nothing to lose but all the private institutions have this challenge
before them.
Shri Apoorv Mahendru, Director, German Academic Exchange Service
3rd
Speaker Sri Apoorv Mahendru explained the relationship and collaboration between India and
Germany. He mentioned the lists of various research collaborations and MOUs between German
and Indian Universities. He is hopeful that we already are proceeding towards a direction
bringing people together.
According to him, Indian institutions and institutions from Germany should cooperate together
for better results because working together leads to great results.
Shri Raju Vaziraney, President, SomDistillirie & Breweries
4th
speaker Sri Raju Vaziraney shared his own success story so that efficient and effective
measures can be adopted for placement of students in the industry.
He enhances the importance of getting the best out of average people, molding them into good
managers and leaders.
He stresses the importance of collaboration and synergy between academia, industry and alumni
for better results.
He focused on value system and ethics for becoming successful in endeavors.
According to him discipline and regimentation are the main areas for molding a boy into
gentleman.
He concluded with the importance of value system and ethics.
While concluding, all the panelists were presented mementos.
01:00 pm – 02:00 pm Valedictory Session
Chairperson: Prof. D.S. Chauhan, President,
Association of Indian Universities & Vice
Chancellor GLA University, Mathura
F-1 Seminar Hall
Chairperson: Prof. D.S. Chauhan, President AIU & VC GLA University, Mathura
Guest of Honour: Dr. Ravi. P. Singh
Welcome Address: Prof. Dr. Balvinder Shukla, VC Amity University Uttar Pradesh.
The event started with welcoming every one once again to the session, and all the
dignitaries on the dais were Welcome by Tulsi Sapling in the following order
Hon‟ble VC Dr. Balvinder Shukla AUUP to Dr. Ravi P.Singh
VC Dr. Balvinder Shukla AUUP to Dr D.S. Chauhan
Dr. Sanjeev Bansal to Shri Furqan Qamar
Dr.C. Tandon to Mr. Sampson David
Dr. Kamal Bava Bhalla to Dr. Balvinder Shukla
Later Vice Chancellor was invited by the Emcee for delivering her Welcome Address.
She formally welcomed all dignitaries & all VCs, Faculty, HOI and expressed her happiness &
pleasure to attend 2 days proceedings. In her talk she expressed her satisfaction and expressed
that there were positive vibes in technical session, including learning from one another.
She expressed her gratitude to all speakers including Dr. Reddy guest of Honour. She expressed
her happiness and said that at the end of the day what matters is the quality of education and we
see QCI contributing in the area of higher education. She thanked AIU without whose support
the Event could not be conceived. She also thanked all the VCs who had come from far and
wide. She expressed her desire for working together and expressed the need to leverage on each
others strengths and weaknesses. She hoped that the past 2 days were comfortable for all but
invited feedback as there is always a scope for improvement.
Prof. Dr. Furqan Qamar, Secretary General, Association of Indian Universities.
Dr. Qamar Formally welcomed Dr. Ravi P. Singh, Dr. D.S Chauhan, Prof. Balvinder Shukla,
and Mr. Sampson David.
At this stage, he thanked AUUP, Chancellor AUUP, founder President. He said he feels
pampered after these 2 days of hospitality, but emphasized that it should be not be a reason to
worry for other universities.
He told that AIU also has a library and books and journal collection related to higher education,
though not digital, but unused library containing documentations related to higher education. He
urged all to publicize the use of this library as it contains plethora of material. He also said that it
is free of cost for all member universities.
Other points covered in the talk were: Bibliography of PhD awarded to improve the quality of
research. Dr Qamar said despite Shodh Ganga & Gangotri, AIU have started annual bulletin. All
books and magazines are gifted to VCs and Registrars. Any one from registered University can
subscribe additional copies for library. It gives latest updates about programs, faculty up to
associate level. He requested all to send all details so that it can be incorporated. On a lighter
note he said that new ideas stop coming to all in office setup. AIU meets provide escape that is
well deserved, to be away from campuses and to come up with new ideas.
He was happy that such forums provides platform to express and present ideas and are stress
busters. Dr. Qamar also reminded all about upcoming General Meeting of AIU at Tirupati, 5-7
February 2017.
Address by Guest of Honor Dr. Ravi P. Singh, Secretary General, Quality Council of India
Dr. Singh started by saying that coming to AIU meetings is always a very happy occasion. He
expressed thankfulness to management of AIU for having him again for thoughtful discussion.
He said “when AIU invites all luminaries I wonder cumulative brain power here can blow up a
country”. He also shared a small inspirational story.
He expressed his views on the need to change a few systems in teaching-learning protocol. He
said teachers need to ask themselves whether students are learning and understanding. Perhaps
the time has come to learn more rather than teaching. He said that we may be teaching a lot of
things but we need to ask whether they are learning.
Dr. Singh thanked Dr. Shukla for providing him with 20 brilliant students from Amity who are
performing exceptionally well at QCI.
He also spoke about the tested model of Chalk and Talk, but urged the need to use technology in
teaching. He said students do not attend classes as they feel they can learn more outside the
classrooms. There needs to be innovation in teaching as well.
Dr. Singh also emphasized that there is a huge request for relaxation of attendance from parents
during examination time. He emphasized that Flexibility, Concept of teaching time, Teaching
during Productive timing should be looked into while planning a curriculum.
Selection of teachers in education sector should be streamlined and they should not be selected
without formal training. Young teachers should be mentored by senior professors. They should
be encouraged to interact with junior students.
He said during initial semester the students should attend lectures of senior teachers. He
congratulated Prof. D.S. Chauhan and said that AIU is doing so well and started ranking NIRF -
collaborative arrangement.
Feedback from Vice Chancellors:
Lt. Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah, Vice Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
He thanked AUUP and AIU for very educative 2 days Programme with very relevant set of
topics. Dr. Shah also thanked AUUP for flawless organization. AUUP, he said has set a
benchmark for other universities, which they may find difficult to emulate.
He urged the need to raise happy kids who know the value of things. He also laid stress on the
fact that MHRD should send a representative to AIU meet and they should refrain from
bombarding VCs everyday with issues. He said universities have become very VC centric
because HOIs and Deans are on rotation, which is good but after their tenure the position and
hierarchy changes. Therefore, HOI and Deans should occupy senior positions in the last 5 years
of their academic tenure.
Dr. S. Rajarajan, Vice Chancellor, SRM University
Dr. Rajan started by thanking all and expressed his pleasure to share his feedback. He said such
meticulous planning was not an easy task. We are in an era of women empowerment and
expressed his happiness that at AUUP many women actively involved in meticulous planning
and execution, which is yet another feather in VC, AUUPs cap, who is herself an empowered
woman. He said all the sessions were systematic and a feast to everyones mind. He congratulated
the entire team of AUUP and AIU and urged everyone to give a standing ovation
Prof. D.S. Chauhan, President, Association of Indian Universities & Vice Chancellor GLA
University, Mathura
Dr. Chauhan, started by thanking all and welcoming the GOH on the dais. He said that AIU is a
university personified. He expressed his gratitude towards Founder president Sir for being ever
so supportive. Problems of education are beyond comprehension and our forefathers had to learn
from facts of life and technology was absent. The mantra during those days was to teach to learn
and learn from one another. The learning concept was from brain to heart. He urged that teaching
should be learning centric. The entire country is facing shortage of teachers. In private sector the
govt. does not give any financial aid. Problems also arise as UGC and AICTE has different
norms and working towards fulfilling both is a difficult act to balance.
He once again thanked the host institution and Dr. Shukla for a wonderful 2 days ent.
Felicitation
Prof. Dr. Balvinder Shukla presented a memento to Dr .Ravi P Singh GOH
Later Dr. D.S Chauhan and Mr.Sampson David presented a memento as a token of appreciation
from AIU to Prof. Dr.Balvinder Shukla
Vote of Thanks by Mr. Sampson David Jt.Secretary, AIU
Mr. Sampson thanked the dignitaries for giving him the opportunity to propose the Vote of
Thanks. He expressed his gratitude towards AUUP and AIU for conducting the meet that was
flawless. He said that the fact that everyone is present till the very end of the session shows how
well the sessions have been planned, and the credit goes to Dr. Shukla and her team.
He also thanked all the VCs for sparing their valuable time for coming to the meet and sharing
their intellectual capital with each other.
Later AIU presented a memento to Dr. Shukla as a toke of their appreciation towards her and her
team and staff.
National Anthem
Lunch