non-motorized transport - effect of marginalization in the indian democracy (download)

88
Consequences Of Favoring the MINORITY & Marginalizing the MAJORITY – in the “Indian Democracy”!! Presented by: Romi Roy Senior Urban Designer, UTTIPEC DDA Delhi Spl. Invitee, Masterplan Review Committee under LG, Delhi Member, High Court Special Task Force on Transportation under CS Member, Technical Committee on Urban Drainage, GNCTD, Delhi Spl. Invitee, LAP Monitoring Committee, MCD Delhi Member, Sub-Committee on Sustainable Habitat, MoUD Member of Committees, Indian Road Congress 22 Dec 2012

Upload: uttipec-dda

Post on 09-May-2015

558 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Consequences Of

Favoring the MINORITY

&

Marginalizing the MAJORITY

– in the “Indian Democracy”!!

Presented by: Romi RoySenior Urban Designer, UTTIPEC DDA DelhiSpl. Invitee, Masterplan Review Committee under LG, Delhi

Member, High Court Special Task Force on Transportation under CS

Member, Technical Committee on Urban Drainage, GNCTD, Delhi

Spl. Invitee, LAP Monitoring Committee, MCD Delhi

Member, Sub-Committee on Sustainable Habitat, MoUD

Member of Committees, Indian Road Congress

22 Dec 2012

Page 2: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Pedestrians + As Many as 20 Types of Vehicles

Who are the Roads for ??

Page 3: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

35% of Trips

are Walk Only!

In addition,

all Public Transport trips include walk!

Delhi Modal Share

Private modes

27%

Public modes

38%

Walk

35%

BICYCLE

4% CAR/TAXI

9%

2W

14%

BUS

27%

METRO

3%

TRAIN (IR)

1%

AUTO RICKSHAW

5%

CYCLE RICKSHAW

2%

WALK

35%

Source: RITES Transport Demand Forecast Study for DoT, GNCTD, 2010

Page 4: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Delhi Modal Share

Private modes

27%

Public modes

38%

Walk

35%

BICYCLE

4% CAR/TAXI

9%

2W

14%

BUS

27%

METRO

3%

TRAIN (IR)

1%AUTO RICKSHAW

5%

CYCLE RICKSHAW

2%

WALK

35%

Only 23% of the city’s people use private vehicles (car/2-wheeler).

Yet almost all infrastructure investments in the city are made for this MINORITY!

Source: RITES Transport Demand Forecast Study for DoT, GNCTD, 2010

Page 5: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

19.4

43.4

47.9

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Vehicle Ownership in Delhi

Private Vehicle Ownership (%) Private Vehicle Trips (%)

35% people of Delhi own CYCLES !! But only 4% of trips are by

cycle – because its unsafe and dangerous to use them!

Source: RITES Transport Demand Forecast Study for DoT, GNCTD, 2010

9

14

4

3835

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Page 6: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Everyone is Walking!

Page 7: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 8: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 9: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 10: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 11: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 12: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Who is Cycling?

Page 13: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 14: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 15: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 16: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 17: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Women prefer to travel in groups by Cycle – for Safety !!Its also a Free mode. Gives them independence.

Page 18: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Where are they on the road?

Page 19: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)
Page 20: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Delhi was once the Cycling City !Delhi was once the Cycling City !

Page 21: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Soon cyclists were marginalized due to growing traffic…Soon cyclists were marginalized due to growing traffic…

Page 22: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Now they are “invisible” so they have no rights to road space and are at the mercy of motor vehicles!!

Page 23: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Cycle tracks are sometimes constructed, but wrongly so!!Cycle tracks are sometimes constructed, but wrongly so!!

Therefore they land up being “encroached” by motor vehicles Therefore they land up being “encroached” by motor vehicles while cycles/ rickshaws remain on road!!while cycles/ rickshaws remain on road!!

Page 24: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

PolicePolice

MCD Engineers MCD Engineers

SamarthyamSamarthyam

Police said they Police said they

were were not aware not aware

that the track that the track

constructed here constructed here

was for Cycles & was for Cycles &

Rickshaws… !!Rickshaws… !!

SamarthyamSamarthyam (an NGO) conducted Audit of one such road.(an NGO) conducted Audit of one such road.

MCD engineers MCD engineers

said they were said they were not not

awareaware of the of the

UTTIPEC or IRC UTTIPEC or IRC

design standards design standards

for footpaths & for footpaths &

cycle tracks…!!cycle tracks…!!

Page 25: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Cycle tracks/ footpaths Cycle tracks/ footpaths are supposed to be 4are supposed to be 4--inch inch high…high…

1111--inch high were inch high were constructed here. constructed here.

For whom ??For whom ??

Page 26: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

How can a rickshaw get on How can a rickshaw get on an 11an 11--inch high cycle track, inch high cycle track, even with a ramp ???even with a ramp ???

They can’t!! Therefore….They can’t!! Therefore….

Page 27: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

….the Track meant for Cycles/rickshaws ….the Track meant for Cycles/rickshaws

is being used for Caris being used for Car--parking comfortably!!parking comfortably!!

Page 28: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

The physically disabled person with us could barely be The physically disabled person with us could barely be pushed up on the footpath/ cycle track. Slope here is pushed up on the footpath/ cycle track. Slope here is 11::2 2 !!!!

Page 29: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

• If you are a car user, the Road is for you. You get first priority to do

whatever you like.

• If you are a Pedestrian, you are “At you Own Risk”. If possible, install

eyes at the back of your head.

• If you are running a cycle-rickshaw, you are illegal and there is no space for you on the road. Be thankful we are not throwing you out.

• If you are on a cycle, again, “At your Own Risk”.

• If you are old or even slightly physically challenged, STAY AT HOME!

Message we are giving to people through our Road Design:

CLICK NEXT >

Page 30: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Some good examples…. The BRT corridor….Some good examples…. The BRT corridor….

Page 31: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Some good examples…. The BRT corridor….Some good examples…. The BRT corridor….

Planned/ designed respectable spaces for pedestrians, Planned/ designed respectable spaces for pedestrians, cyclists, autocyclists, auto--parking as well as motorparking as well as motor--vehicles !!vehicles !!

Page 32: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Some good examples…. The BRT corridor….Some good examples…. The BRT corridor….

A simple tableA simple table--top crossing lets a cyclist move freely across top crossing lets a cyclist move freely across driveway, without hampering the car’s movement!!driveway, without hampering the car’s movement!!

Page 33: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

33

Policy recommendation 1:

Promote Non-Motorized Transport &

Pedestrian Safety.

Why ?Why ?

Page 34: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Mode

Average Trip

Length (KM)

•Car 10.5

•2W 8.7

•Auto Rickshaw 4.7

•Bus 8.8

•Metro 13.8

•Train (IR) 20.2

•Bicycle 4

•Cycle Rickshaw 1.7

•Walk 1.1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

% o

f T

rip

s

Trip lengths in KM

•• 6060% of Trips in Delhi are below % of Trips in Delhi are below 44 KMs.KMs.

Average Trip Lengths

by Mode: Delhi

Cycles, Cycle-rickshaws & Walking

are the ideal modes for short 1-4 km Trips.

34

Source: RITES Transport Demand Forecast Study for DoT, GNCTD, 2010

6060--70%70%

tripstrips

Page 35: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Time, minutes

Dis

tan

ce

, k

m

Metro Walking

Bicycling BRT

2-Wheeler/car

car bicycle BRT metro

walk

For a 3 km trip, Buses & Cycle are

most efficient PT modes.

Source: Created by IIT Delhi + iTrans

Page 36: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Schools

±0 6 12 18 243

Kilometers

Legend

School

railway line

NCTD Boundary

yamuna watercourse

IGI airport

forests and ridge

Buffer School

• 3 km buffer around schools of Sec. and Sr. Sec schools. (Schools marked From . Eicher City Map, Edition 2)

• The Catchment area of education based trips.

NMT inclusive Planning –Where do you need it?

Source: TRIPP/IIT Delhi

Page 37: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Legend

JJC_Point

POPULATION

0 - 100

101 - 200

201 - 400

401 - 800

801 - 1600

1601 - 10000

nctd line

railway line

yamuna watercourse0 4 8 12 162

Kilometers±

Trips origin: slums

• Distributions of JJ Clusters in Delhi

• There is direct relation between the density of these poor households and the number of cycle trips origin.

Source: TRIPP/IIT Delhi

Page 38: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

NMT trips destination: shops, MLU, CSC, DC, Wholesale areas

• Major Commercial Centres, District Centres, -18%

• Shops / Mixed Land Use and Wholesale areas -23%

• These are spread all over urban area as major destination for poor urban workers using cycles for upto20km per day

Legend

Shops / Mixed Landuse

district centers

C.S. Centers

wholesale areas

yamuna watercourse

rai lway line

nctd line±0 4 8 12 162

KilometersFigure 4.17 Shows locations of major Commercial Centres, District Centres, Shops /

Mixed Land Use and Wholesale areas

Source:/TRIPP/IIT Delhi

Page 39: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

NMT destination: manufacturing areas and govt. offices

• 21% of cycle work- trips have factory destination and travel up to 10 km in a day

• about 35% have offices (Govt. and Pvt.) as their destination and travelling upto 10 km per day

n

nn

nnnnnn

n n

n

n

±0 6 12 18 243

Kilometers

Legend

n govt landuse

railway line

NCTD Boundary

yamuna watercourse

govt. landuse

manufacture

IGI airport

forests and ridge

Buffer_of_manufacture

Buffer_of_govt_landuseSource: TRIPP/IIT Delhi

Page 40: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

40

Walking & CycleWalking & Cycle--rickshaws are the most rickshaws are the most important Feeders to Metro/ BRT Stations.important Feeders to Metro/ BRT Stations.

MODE FROM ORIGIN TO METRO FROM METRO TO DESTINATION

Walk 61% 78%

Cycle Rickshaw 12% 9%

Two Wheeler 11% --

Auto 8% 8%

Bus 5% 5%

Car/Taxi 3% 1%

Source: RITES Transport Demand Forecast Study: May 2008

Mode used to Reach Metro Stations:

Yet NO Metro Station provides authorized Yet NO Metro Station provides authorized

cyclecycle--rickshaw parking !!rickshaw parking !!

Page 41: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

41

• A Car serves one person a day & occupies minimum 3 parking

spaces throughout the city.

• An IPT mode occupies only one parking space, and

serves multiple people throughout the day.

Policy Recommendation 2:

• Improve Supply & Service by IPT.

• Provide authorized Parking.

auto rickshawtaxi

Page 42: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

12th Plan Strategies to

promote IPT:

1. Provide More IPT Choices

2. Provide organized IPT Parking at all

Metro Stations & along all Roads.

Page 43: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Source: Delhi Traffic Police

• There are more than 2100 accidents occurred during 2010.

• The maximum casualty in the

fatal accidents are pedestrians,

cyclists & 2 wheelers.

• The maximum accidents have occurred during the lean hours both

in the morning & night.

Road Safety is Low.Road Safety is Low.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Ring Road

Outer Ring Road

Rohtak Road

G T K Road

Mathura Road

N. H.-8

Mahrauli Badarpur Road

Najafgarh Road

G. T. Road

Wazirabad Road Pedestrians

Two Wheelers

Self

Fatal Accidents in 2010

The reasons for all accidents are:

1. Signal free high speed corridors.

2. Insufficient/ No pedestrian Crossing facilities.

3. Central verge without grills.

4. No speed breakers/ rumble strips on long stretches.

5. Absence of dedicated lanes for slow moving vehicles.

6. Heavy volume of traffic.

7. Glaring during night etc.

Page 44: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

• Making motor vehicle movement smoother for a few years, before jams take over.

• Making it impossible/ very difficult to cross roads on foot!

• Making cycles & cycle-rickshaws move contra-flow, thus endangering their lives.

• Making it impossible/ difficult to interchange between different bus routes near junctions.

• Creating environments suitable for eve-teasing and heinous crimes like Rape!

• In long run, increased car use leads to Congestion again, while use of all other modes has been made excruciatingly difficult or impossible!

How are CarHow are Car--oriented Infrastructure oriented Infrastructure Impacting us?Impacting us?

Page 45: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

45

How to cross this road ??How to cross this road ??

Where to walk or cycle ??Where to walk or cycle ??

What happens to Women here after 6 pm ?What happens to Women here after 6 pm ?

DhaulanDhaulan KuanKuan SignalSignal--free Cloverleaf (free Cloverleaf (जलेबीजलेबी))

Page 46: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

All major Rape cases in the recent past happen on these All major Rape cases in the recent past happen on these large roads built to facilitate fast car movement.....large roads built to facilitate fast car movement.....

Page 47: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

.... Creating vast.... Creating vast inhumane, peopleinhumane, people--less, unless, un--watched, watched, places places –– which are rape & evewhich are rape & eve--teasing havens!!teasing havens!!

AIIMS flyoverAIIMS flyover

Page 48: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

.... Creating vast.... Creating vast inhumane, peopleinhumane, people--less, unless, un--watched, watched, places places –– which are rape & evewhich are rape & eve--teasing havens!!teasing havens!!

Dwarka

Page 49: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

After construction of the Clover Leaf Flyover, the walking distance

from AIIMS exit to Dilli Haat has increased by over 5 times.

In addition, there are no safe crossings available, so people risk their lives crossing the street at the most convenient locations.

Walking Distances are increased by >Walking Distances are increased by >5 5 times times

after after जलेबीजलेबी construction at AIIMS!construction at AIIMS!..

((Source: CSE)Source: CSE)

Page 50: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

People can’t cross the street between neighborhoods!!

Walking Distances are increased by >5 times Walking Distances are increased by >5 times wherever a flyover is wherever a flyover is constructredconstructred..

Page 51: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

All major flyovers have failed, or led to MORE All major flyovers have failed, or led to MORE congestion.congestion.

Page 52: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

All major flyovers have failed, or led to MORE All major flyovers have failed, or led to MORE congestion.congestion.

Page 53: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Congestion is good!!Congestion is good!!

It makes people shift to BRT or other modes like cycles!!It makes people shift to BRT or other modes like cycles!!

Jakarta

Delhi

Delhi

Page 54: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

What to Do?

1. Follow Road Standards & Guidelines.

(IRC+ UTTIPEC)

2. Plan a Network for cyclists, rickshaws &

pedestrians, not pieces.

3. Technically Design, Implement & Supervise

projects.

4. Regular Audit and Maintenance.

Page 55: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Street Design GuidelinesStreet Design Guidelines“…for Equitable Distribution of Road Space” - NUTP“…for Equitable Distribution of Road Space” - NUTP

© UTTIPEC, Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi

Guidelines Adopted: Nov 2009. Revision 1: Nov 2010

Page 56: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

56

Primary Arterial Other Primary Arterial Primary Collector Secondary Collector Local Streets

RIGHT OF WAY 60-80 M 45-60 M 30-40 M 18-24 M 12-20 M

SPEED RANGE 50 – 70 km/hr 30 - 40 km/hr. 20 - 30 km/hr 10- 20 km/hr 10-20 km/hr

SPEED CONTROL

Enforcement and Traffic Calming required

Enforcement and Traffic Calming required

Enforcement and Traffic calming required.

Traffic calming essential.

Traffic calming required

BUSWAYS FOR BRT

Segregated buswaysrequired where BRT proposed

Segregated buswaysrequired where BRT proposed

Segregated buswaysrequired where BRT proposed, at-grade segregation possible on R/Ws above 36 M

No segregated bus lane; but Road may be designated Bus-NMV only if required

No segregated bus lanes or bus operations required; but Road may be designated Bus-NMV only if required

MOTORIZED LANES

2 to 4 motorized lanes per direction, min. 3.3 m wide (min. 3.5 for BRT busways)

2 to 4 motorized lanes per direction, min. 3.3 m wide (min. 3.3 for BRT busways)

2 to 3 motorized lanes per direction, min. 3.1m wide (min. 3.3 for BRT busways)

No minimum lane width specification.

No minimum lane width specification.

CYCLE/ NMV TRACKS

Segregated cycle tracks required; min. 2.5 m wide for two-way movement.

Segregated cycle tracks required; min. 2.5 m wide for two-way movement.

Traffic Calming essential where segregated Cycle tracks are not provided; Cycle tracks to be min. 2.5 m wide if block lengths are >250m.

Cycle lanes can work, segregated tracks required where friction & encroachment expected

No special feature for cyclists

SERVICE LANES Serv ice lanes required. Serv ice lanes required for residential frontages; for commercial / MU frontages, not required.

No serv ice lane required

No serv ice lane required

No serv ice lane required

MEDIANS Continuous median; all openings and intersections accompanied by signals and traffic calming. (no grade separators within city)

Continuous median; all openings and intersections accompanied by signals and traffic calming. (no grade separators within city)

Intermittent or No median; openings/ intersections accompanied by signals and traffic calming.

Intermittent or No median required; For roads where need for Median is felt, issue to be brought to UTTIPEC. Crossings to be traffic calmed.

No medians; traffic calmed crossings, or mini roundabouts

NOTE: Lane Widths have been designated based on desired speed of the road category.

* Guidelines prepared by UTTIPEC, DDA; Revised and Updated in Nov 2010.

Masterplan-2021 Road Hierarchy: Categorization*

56

Page 57: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

MobilitySafety

& Comfort

Ecology

Integrated

05 Bicycle and Non-Motorized Transport Infrastructure

Provision for introducing cycle tracks, pedestrian and disabled friendly features in arterial and sub-arterial roads is a must. (MPD-2021)

Bicycles, Rickshaw s and other Non-Motorized transport are essential and the most eco-

friendly feeder services to and from MRTS stations. They are also indispensible for short & medium length trips for shopping, daily needs, school, etc. Providing safe and segregated NMT lanes on all Arterial and Collector Streets w ould encourage their use and reduce the dependency of people on the private car...

MAIN PRINCIPLES:Mobility - Continuous and safe NMT lanes with adequate crossings are essential

throughout the city- Ample parking facilities for NMTs must be provided at all MRTS stations

Ecology: - The most eco-friendly mode of transportation.

Safety/Comfort - Safe crossings for NMT are essential for their safety. - NMT lanes must be segregated from faster motorized traffic.- Shade must be provide along NMT lanes as well as at traffic signals.

05A Segregated Cycle +

NMT Tracks

05B Bicycle Parking and

Other

Infrastructure

57

UTTIPEC

Street Design

Guidelines

Page 58: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

58 ESSENTIAL GUIDELINESStreet Design Guidelines © UTTIPEC, DDA 2009

Not Preferable 05A Segregated Cycle and NMT TracksKey Principles:• Cycle Lane - A portion of a roadw ay that has been designated by striping, signs,

and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists.

• Cycle Track - A Track intended for the use of bicycles that is physically

separated from motorized vehicle traff ic by an open space or barrier w ithin the

existing ROW.

• Provision for introducing cycle tracks, pedestrian and disabled friendly features in

arterial and sub-arterial roads is a must, as per MPD-2021. Minimum

acceptable Width for single lane movement is 2.0 M.

• NMT Lanes are meant for Bicycles, Cycle-Rickshaw s, Hand pushcarts, Haw ker

carts, animal draw n carts, etc.

Key Guidelines:• NMVs are the second most vulnerable group

of road users and therefore must be clearly segregated from faster moving motorized

traffic, especially on Roads designed for

motorized speeds of

• The NMV lane should be constructed with smooth-finished cement Concrete or

Asphalt in order to ensure a low maintenance and smooth riding surface. In

the absence of this, cyclists will tend to

move into the MV lanes which may be more comfortable.

• Minimum Dimension of NMV Track is 2.5 M.

• NMV Lanes or Tracks should be located on

both sides of the street.

• A 0.7 M landscaped buffer should be kept between NMV and MV lanes in order to

maximize the speed, efficiency and capacity

of the NMV Lane.

‘Marked’ Cycle Lanes have failed in Delhi

as vehicles freely drive and park on these

cycle lanes.

Marked lanes also suffer from lack of visibil ity.

Lack of physical separation also deprives

cycles of safety and does not allow them to

pick up speed.

Mixing of modes slows down everyone and

creates chaos! NMV lanes must be given clear crossing Tracks at junctions.NMV lanes must be given clear crossing Tracks at junctions.

??

Page 59: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

59Street Design Guidelines © UTTIPEC, DDA 2009

ESSENTIAL GUIDELINES

Best Practices05A Bicycle and NMT Tracks

Segregated Cycle-NMV Track,

BRT Corridor, Delhi

Segregated TWO-WAY Cycle Track,

Canal Street, Manhattan

Segregated Cycle Track on 20 M Road,

Manhattan

2.5 M is the Optimum Cycle Track Width. 1.5 M Width is required for Cycle Rickshaw Parking. Detail Source: Oasis Designs

Inc.

Relative Levels of NMV Tracks and Footpaths.Source: TRIPP, IIT Delhi, BRT Design Specif ications, 2009

Shaded Waiting Area for Cycles at Road Junction, Hangzhou, China

Cycle track on Public Staircase, Europe

05A

Page 60: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

60 ESSENTIAL GUIDELINESStreet Design Guidelines © UTTIPEC, DDA 2009

Not Preferable 05B Bicycle Parking and Other InfrastructureKey Principles:

• Cycles are a very desirable and affordable private feeder service to MRTS/ BRTS Stations.

• To encourage their usage therefore - safe and secure cycle parking options must be provided.

• Secure Cycle Parking must be provided at all MRTS/ BRTS Stations.

80% of Cycles under the Paris Cycle Share

Program are stolen or damaged.

Source: Samuel Bollendorf f for The New York

Times

Open lockable parking bays like above may

not succeed in Delhi – due to fear of theft or

vandalism. However, they may work as a short term (10-minute) parking option.

Key Guidelines:• Long-Stay Parking – Cycle parking lots must be enclosed, ticketed (like car-parking

lots) and shaded from w eather. Cycle parking lots can be combined w ith ticket counter

booths, local police booths, cycle service stations or shared areas w ithin private building

complexes.

• Short-stay parking – should be open to view and close to entrances of destinations.

The stands should allow at least the frame and ideally both w heels, to be secured to them.

A typical Cycle Stand is show n above.

Source: http://www.norwich.gov.uk/local_plan/images/figures/diag1a.jpg

http://www.bolsov er.gov.uk/localplan/ws_pics/image005.jpg

Page 61: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

61Street Design Guidelines © UTTIPEC, DDA 2009

ESSENTIAL GUIDELINES

Best Practices

2.1 or 2.5 M x 5.0 M Parking Bays 2.1 or 2.5 M x 5.0 M Parking Bays

Graphic Source:

http://www.hackney-

cyclists.org.uk/parking/on_street_x.jpg

A Cycle-repair stall next to a Cycle Track, ShanghaiSAMPLE CYCLE PARKING PLANSAMPLE CYCLE PARKING PLAN

05B Bicycle Parking and Other Infrastructure

Public Cycle Parking in a Private CompoundPublic Cycle Parking in a Private Compound

Stacked Cycle Parking, ChinaStacked Cycle Parking, China

Shaded and Ticketed cycle Parking, BeijingShaded and Ticketed cycle Parking, Beijing

Cycle Rickshaw Parking, Cycle Parking Stands, Cycle repair Stalls, etc.

can all be accommodated within the Flexible “Multi-Functional Zone” (Section 04)

Sample Drawing: Pradeep Sachev a Design Associates

05B

Page 62: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

62Street Design Guidelines © UTTIPEC, DDA 2009

ESSENTIAL GUIDELINES

Best Practices01E Continuous Pavement

BRT Corridor, New Delhi

Typical Detail of Raised Driveway at Building Entries.

Source: TRIPP, IIT Delhi, BRT Design Specifications, 2009

At entry points of properties – introduce “raised driveway” or “ table-top” details – where

pedestrian and cycle tracks continue at their same level, but the motorized vehicles have to move

over a gentle ramp to enter the property.

01E

01E

Page 63: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Cycle Rickshaw Stands

Page 64: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Cycle Parking

Page 65: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

65

45 M Primary Arterial Road

Drawings only Suggestive, not Prescriptive. Prepared by UTTIPEC, DDA 65

IRC Section

UTTIPEC

Section

Cycle Tracks

MANDATORY

Page 66: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

66

40 M Primary Arterial Road

Drawings only Suggestive, not Prescriptive. Prepared by UTTIPEC, DDA 66

IRC Section

UTTIPEC

Section

Cycle Tracks

MANDATORY

Page 67: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

67

30 M Arterial Road

Drawings only Suggestive, not Prescriptive. Prepared by UTTIPEC, DDA67

IRC Section

UTTIPEC

Section

Cycle Tracks

MANDATORY

Page 68: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

68

NOTE:

Non-motorized Lanes/ Cycle Tracks are

OPTIONAL on R/Ws below 40m Width.

In case smoother flow of motorized traffic is

desired, one “Shared Lane” may be replaced

by a dedicated Non-motorized Lane, in each

direction, to reduce friction between slow and

fast moving vehicles.

30 M Primary Collector Road

Drawings only Suggestive, not Prescriptive. Prepared by UTTIPEC, DDA 68

IRC Section

UTTIPEC

Section

Cycle Tracks

OPTIONAL

Page 69: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

69

18-24 M Secondary Collector Road

Drawings only Suggestive, not Prescriptive. Prepared by UTTIPEC, DDA 69

IRC Section

UTTIPEC

Section

Cycle Tracks

OPTIONAL

Page 70: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Example:

45m Road

(Vikas Marg)

Cycle tracks,

footpaths,

rickshaw-parking,

auto-parking,

vendor cart spaces,

trees,

car-parking,

toilets…

accommodated

within R/W

without disturbing

carriageway

space !

707/26/2012 UTTIPEC

Page 71: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

717/26/2012 UTTIPEC

Example:

45m Road

(Vikas Marg)

Cycle tracks,

footpaths,

rickshaw-parking,

auto-parking,

vendor cart spaces,

trees,

car-parking,

toilets…

accommodated

within R/W

without disturbing

carriageway

space !

Page 72: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

727/26/2012 UTTIPEC

Example:

45m Road

(Vikas Marg)

Cycle tracks,

footpaths,

rickshaw-parking,

auto-parking,

vendor cart spaces,

trees,

car-parking,

toilets…

accommodated

within R/W

without disturbing

carriageway

space !

Page 73: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

A complete City-wide Safe Cycling Network to be developed.

Arterial Roads to have safe Cycle Tracks

Page 74: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Nallahs can be Cycle-Ecomobility corridors, forming a City-wide Network.

A complete City-wide Safe Cycling Network to be developed.

Page 75: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

75© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Small Successes Road

Accidents!

Page 76: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

76© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Even when traffic is jammed & standing,

still pedestrian crossings are not left free !

Why No Crossings ?Why No Crossings ?

Page 77: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

77© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

No signalized

zebra

crossings

= jaywalking

= Road

accidents!

Page 78: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

78© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Pilot Projects

Times of India, 2010

Signalized

Crossings

were

proposed

every ~250m

on Aurobindo

Marg to make

it safer!

Page 79: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

79© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Pilot Projects

Times of India, 2010

Signalized

Crossings

were

proposed

every ~250m

on Aurobindo

Marg to make

it safer!

Page 80: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

80© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Typical Safe

Crossing Designs:

Page 81: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

81© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Typical Safe

Crossing Designs:

Page 82: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

82© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Provide safety through Design

Page 83: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

83© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Safe Crossings implemented on Aurobindo Marg:

• Traffic calming

strips before

zebra

crossings

Page 84: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

84© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

Provide safety through Design

• New Safe zebra

crossings

Page 85: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

85© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

• New Safe zebra

crossings

Provide safety through Design

Page 86: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

86© UTTIPEC, DDA 2012

SuccessProvide safety through Design

Page 87: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

What to Do?

Problems, Issues and

Solutions are known!

POLITICAL WILL IS MISSING !

Page 88: Non-motorized Transport - Effect of marginalization in the Indian Democracy (Download)

Safety and Pride for Non-motorized Transport

One day we will have it!