nobel lecture slides

73
http://[email protected] How mammals sense infection: from endotoxin to the Toll-like receptors Bruce Beutler Center for Genetics of Host Defense UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX

Upload: dinhhanh

Post on 24-Jan-2017

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • http://[email protected]

    How mammals sense infection: from endotoxin to the Toll-like

    receptors Bruce Beutler

    Center for Genetics of Host Defense UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, TX

  • Ernest Beutler, M.D., 1928-2008

  • Galen 129 199, AD

    Hippocrates 460 - 370, BCE

    Moses ben-Maimon (Maimonides) 1135-1204, AD

    Infections and their transmissible character were known in antiquity

    Staphylococcus aureus

    Neisseria meningitidis Herpes simplex

    Chlamydia trachomatis Tinea faciei

    Measles

  • Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1632 - 1723

    while microbes were only discovered in the 17th century

  • and the association between microbes and infection was only discovered in the 19th century.

    Louis Pasteur 1822-1895

    Robert Koch 1843-1910

  • What might be the nature of contact between microbe and host?

    ?

  • Soon after microbes were discovered, it was appreciated that mammals recognize them as foreign and mount an intense

    inflammatory response

    In 1891, Richard Pfeiffer, a student of Robert Koch, noted that heat-killed microbes caused a violent reaction in guinea pigs soon after they were injected into these animals. He coined the term endotoxin to describe the poisonous, heat-stable principle associated with bacteria, responsible for fever, inflammation, shock and sometimes death.

  • Gram negative bacteria Eschericia coli

    Peptidoglycan Layer

    Outer Membrane

    Inner Membrane

    Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)

    O antigen

    Outer core

    Inner core

    Lipid A

  • LPS

  • Biosynthesis of Lipid A

    Christian R.H. Raetz 1946 - 2011

  • Lipid A Lipid IVa

  • Abraham Braude, 1917-1984

  • Wasting disease (cachexia) in a cow with African trypanosomiasis

  • Plasma triglyceride

    LPL, AcCoAC, FAS

    LPL suppression factor

    Tumors

    Other tissue

    Endotoxin Trypanosome factors Tumor factors

    Infection Malignancy

    Adipocyte

    ?

    ?

    LPL

    Cachectin

    RAW 264.7 macrophages

    3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes

    1983

  • Isolation of mouse cachectin Pressure dialysis of medium from ~500 10 cm plates

    of LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells (early harvest) ConA sepharose chromatography Isoelectric focusing in a glycerol gradient Preparative native gel electrophoresis Preparative SDS gel electrophoresis Yielded microgram quantities of an apparently pure

    17.5 kD protein with approximately 2% yield of initial biological activity (prior to denaturing gel electrophoresis).

    Cachectin comprised 1-2% of the protein secreted by RAW 264.7 cells during the first two hours following LPS activation.

  • Tumor necrosis and cytolysis

    Triglyceride synthesis, LPL, FAS AcCoA carboxylase, glycerol release

    FAT

    TUMOR

    MACROPHAGE LPS

    This raised the question: might TNF mediate all

    effects of LPS, including the lethal effect?

    TNF

  • Purified TNF mimics LPS toxicity

    Denatured TNF

    Active TNF

    1984

  • The lethal effect of LPS is attenuated by passive immunization against TNF

    1985

    N = 16 mice per point

  • TNF

  • Triglyceride synthesis, LPL, FAS, AcCoA carboxylase, glycerol release

    FAT

    Cytotoxicity, rearrangement, neutrophil adhesion, MHC expression, procoagulant, PLA2. Thrombomodulin

    ENDOTHELIUM

    MACROPHAGE

    Degranulation, endothelial adhesion, lysozyme secretion, superoxide anion production, H2O2 release, phagocytosis

    NEUTROPHIL

    MUSCLE Transmembrane potential, glucose uptake

    Proliferation of T cells

    T CELLS

    LPS

    Tumor necrosis, cytolysis

    TUMOR

    TNF

  • The C3H/HeJ Mouse and the Lps Locus

    Resistant to LPS (Heppner and Weiss, 1965)

  • The C3H/HeJ Mouse and the Lps Locus

    Fail to make a cytokine response to LPS (for example, no TNF), suggesting a proximal defect.

  • C3H/HeJ mice: resistant to LPS (and only LPS)

    Viruses

    Responsive Unresponsive

    Gram negative bacteria

    Responsive

    Bacteria

    Nucleic Acids LPS Flagellin Lipoproteins

    Responsive

    Bacteria

  • C3H/HeJ bone marrow transfer to C3H/HeN and vice versa: susceptibility to LPS-induced lethality is determined by the donor

    C3H/HeJ Marrow

    C3H/HeJ C3H/HeN

    Alive Alive Dead Dead

    C3H/HeJ Marrow C3H/HeN Marrow C3H/HeJ Marrow C3H/HeN Marrow

    C3H/HeN Marrow

    LPS h h

  • The C3H/HeJ Mouse and the Lps Locus

    Hypersusceptible to authentic G(-) infections (Obrien, et al., 1980; Svanborg-Eden, et al., 1983)

  • The C3H/HeJ Mouse and the Lps Locus

    LPS does not work as an adjuvant in C3H/HeJ mice (B.J. Skidmore et al, 1976)

  • The C3H/HeJ Mouse and the Lps Locus

    Single locus (Lps); allelic to a mutation in the LPS-refractory C57BL/10ScCr strain (Coutinho and Meo,1978).

  • The C3H/HeJ Mouse and the Lps Locus

    Lps mapped to Chr. 4 between Mup1 and Polysyndactyly loci by Watson et al. in 1978.

  • LPS

    CD14

    ? IB

    p50 p60

    TNF

    NF-B

    R. Ulevitch and colleagues, 1990

  • Conventional searches for a difference between C3H/HeJ and C3H/HeN

    3. Comparisons at the protein level.

    C3H/HeJ C3H/HeN

    1. Cross immunization of C3H/HeJ and C3H/HeN mice.

    Macrophage

    C3H/HeJ C3H/HeN

    2. Transfect cDNA from C3H/HeN to

    C3H/HeJ cells.

    cDNA

    C3H/HeN cells

    mRNA

    C3H/HeJ cells

    AAAAA

    AAAA

    TNF?

    AAA

    LPS

  • Betsy Layton

    Alexander Poltorak

    Irina Smirnova

    Christophe Van Huffel

  • Positional cloning entails

    Genetic mapping (in our case, on 2093 meioses)

    Physical mapping (in our case, entire interval cloned in 66 BACs and 2 YACs)

    Exploration for genes (in our case, 1 authentic genes and 7 pseudogenes)

    Mutation identification (find the one and only genetic change responsible for the phenotype.

  • 1993

  • Comparison of Mouse and Human LPS Gene Locus

    24

    23 22

    21

    12 13

    11

    13

    12

    21.1 21.2

    22.3

    22.1 22.2

    32

    31

    34.1

    21.3

    33

    11

    34.2 34.3

    Human 9 Mouse 4

    TYRP1

    ORM TAL2

    PAPPA

    IFNA

    Pappa

    lfna b

    Tal2

    Hxb Orm1

    p

    q

    Mup1

    Ps

  • 1

    Lps

    Lps

  • 1995

  • 1995

  • Methods for finding genes within BACs

    Exon trapping Hybridization selection Computational prediction

    (GRAIL) Shotgun sequencing and EST

    database searching

  • Creation of BACs

    Fragmentation of BACs

    Remote EST database

    Cloning of Fragments BLASTing

    Vector

    Mammalian DNA

  • Lps

    Lps

  • LPS LPS IL-1

    TLR4 CD14 IL-1R

    ?

  • C3H/HeN

    C3H/HeJ

    Screen shot of a mutation in TLR4 distinguishing C3H/HeJ from C3H/HeN mice

    1998

  • On Northern blot analysis, C57BL/10ScCr mice appear not to express Tlr4

    1998

  • RT-PCR also shows non-expression of Tlr4 in C57BL/10ScSr mice

    1998

  • Tlr4lps-n

    Tlr4lps-d

    C3H/HeN

    C3H/HeJ

    F I P G V

    F I H G V 1998

    712

  • Deletion of 74K in the C57BL/10ScCr mouse

    1998

  • But the question remained:

    Was there direct contact between TLR and LPS?

  • Lipid A: Agonist for both

    mouse and human

    Lipid IVa: Agonist for mouse;

    antagonist for human

  • Mouse Mouse Human Human

    C3H/HeJ

    Responsive

    C3H/HeJ C3H/HeJ C3H/HeJ

    Lipid A Lipid IVa Lipid A Lipid IVa

    Responsive Responsive Unresponsive

    TNF TNF TNF

  • plasma membrane

    TIR

    TLR4

    MD-2

    LPS

    BS Park et al. Nature 458, 7242 (2009) R Shimazu et al., J Exp Med 189, 11 (1999

    Image created using PyMol Y. Xu et al. Nature 408, 6808 (2000)

  • TLR4 LPS

    MD-2

  • > > > > > > > >

    > > > > > > > >

    CD14

    > > > > > > > >

    > > > > > > > >

    MD-2

    TLR4 Lps TLRs 2,1 TLR3 TLR7 TLR5 TLRs 2,6 TLR9

    LPS LP

    The role of TLR4 as a sensor of LPS suggested that other microbial ligands were sensed by other TLRs, and the

    specificity of most TLRs was revealed by knocking the genes out one at a time,

    largely in the Akira lab.

    CpG ssRNA Flagellin Poly I:C

  • Now, the mode of binding of several ligands to TLRs is understood

  • DMTOLL1

    HUMTLR4

    LU-U73916

    Function of the TIR domain throughout the tree of life

  • Pamela Ronald, Discoverer of XA21

    Images courtesy Dr. Pamela Ronald

    Bacterial blight of rice

    Xanthomonas oryzae (Xoo)

  • Monocots (Rice) Insects (Drosophila) Vertebrates (Mouse)

  • Making new phenotypes in mice

    * *

    * ** **

    **

    * *

    * **

    ENU

    G1

    G2

    G3

    ENU C57BL/6

    As of 9/20/11, >151,000 G1 + G3 mice produced. ~60 coding/splicing changes per sperm.

    Mask

    Business Class WT

  • The process of finding mutations was greatly accelerated by the sequencing

    and annotation of the mouse genome

    Never again was it necessary to make a BAC contig or search for genes.

  • MGI genome browser (typical view)

  • Massively parallel short read sequencing has made targeted exon sequencing unnecessary in most cases.

    The cost of sequencing a mouse genome to >90% coverage is now about $3,000. About 4 mouse genomes can be sequenced per week in our lab.

    The price per base pair continues to drop by about 80% each year.

    With minimal mapping, it is possible to find mutations extremely quickly.

  • TLR7 TLR9

  • From genetics to structures to mechanism

  • In plasmacytoid dendritic cells, specialized machinery is needed for TLR signaling

    salt and pepper

    Disbindin

  • Mutations we have found to cause MCMV susceptibility

  • Beutler Lab, December 15, 2009

    Nancy Nelson

    Betsy Layton

    Cindy Boulton

    Charles Ross Yu

    Xia

    Dan Popkin

    Philippe Krebs

    Carrie Arnold

    Celine Eidenschenk

    Christina Neppl

    Kathi Brandl

    Xiaohong Li

    Pei Lin Xin

    Du

    Micha Berger

    Nora Smart

    Sunyong Won Eva

    Moresco Christine Domingo

    Liz Flores

    Elaine Pirie

    Sara Kalina

    Bruce Beutler Diantha

    La Vine

    Stephen Lyon

    Lei Sun

    Hua Huang

    Amanda Blasius

    Owen Siggs Lara

    Krieg

    Wataru Tomisato

  • Others not shown in the last slide

    Jiangfan Jiang Kasper Hoebe Ben Croker Koichi Tabeta Karine Crozat Sophie Rutschmann Philippe Georgel

  • For the cloning of the Lps locus

    Alexander Poltorak Irina Smirnova Christophe Van Huffel Betsy Layton Xiaolong He Mu-Ya Liu Xin Du Dale Birdwell Erica Alejos

    Chris Galanos and Marina Freudenberg (Max Planck Institute fur

    Immunbiologie, Freiburg)

    Paola Ricciardi-Castagnoli (University of Milan)

    How mammals sense infection: from endotoxin to the Toll-like receptorsSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4while microbes were only discovered in the 17th centuryand the association between microbes and infection was only discovered in the 19th century.Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9LPSBiosynthesis of Lipid ASlide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23The C3H/HeJ Mouse andthe Lps LocusThe C3H/HeJ Mouse andthe Lps LocusSlide Number 26Slide Number 27The C3H/HeJ Mouse andthe Lps LocusThe C3H/HeJ Mouse andthe Lps LocusThe C3H/HeJ Mouse andthe Lps LocusThe C3H/HeJ Mouse andthe Lps LocusSlide Number 32Conventional searches for a difference between C3H/HeJ and C3H/HeNSlide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Comparison of Mouse and Human LPS Gene Locus Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Methods for finding genes within BACsSlide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Slide Number 47Slide Number 48Slide Number 49Slide Number 50But the question remained:Slide Number 52Slide Number 53Slide Number 54Slide Number 55Slide Number 56Slide Number 57Slide Number 58Slide Number 59Slide Number 60Slide Number 61Slide Number 62The process of finding mutations was greatly accelerated by the sequencing and annotation of the mouse genomeMGI genome browser (typical view)Massively parallel short read sequencing has made targeted exon sequencing unnecessary in most cases.Slide Number 66Slide Number 67Slide Number 68Slide Number 69Slide Number 70Slide Number 71Slide Number 72Slide Number 73