nl experience on comparative assessment · microsoft powerpoint - 08 - netherlands 20181017 nl...
TRANSCRIPT
NL experience on Comparative Assessment
Ivonne Elberse, Workshop CA, Lisbon, 2018
Content• NL experience• NL procedure• Questions
NL experience
Limited experience• 9 CA’s• 1 CA in 2015, 1 in 2017 and 7 in
2018
3
NL procedure
4
Ctgb: initiation CA
NPPO: CA Agronomic considerations
SuitableAlternative(s)available
Substitution not possible
Ctgb: Comparative safety
Substitution possible
No suitablealternativesavailable
Agronomic considerations
5
List (non) chemical alternatives
Effectivenessalternatives / limitsof use
Resistance risk Consequences Minor uses
Stop CA
Alternative available regardingEFF and RES and MU
Substitution possible
Stop CA Stop CA
Assumptions (1)
• No agricultural system approach• Authorised products are effective• Other CfS is no alternative• Alternative has same mode of
application• Resistance management: no change
in # MoA’s or at least 5 MoA’s
6
Example
7
Assumptions (2)
• Non-chemical alternatives accordingto Defra document
8
Example
9
Questions
• When is a non chemical methodconsidered as an alternative?
• Do other MS use information fromgrowers/advisors/expert judgement?
• Do other MS assess effectiveness of alternatives?
10
Thank you for yourattention