njask science grades 4 & 8 and njbct tia burnett supervisor of testing september 2015 (revised...
TRANSCRIPT
NJASK Science grades 4 & 8
and NJBCTTia Burnett
Supervisor of TestingSeptember 2015 (revised 10/2015)
Grade 4 Cohort Demographics
389 students processed 3 students not present 2 APA students 383 students with valid scores
GE 337 SE 29 LEP 18 current
2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20.1 20.3
27.7 27.725.1
51.8
58.7
51.8 53.857.1
28
21 20.5 18.523.2
4th GradeFive Year Summary of District Performance
Partially Proficent Proficient Advance Proficient
% o
f Pro
ficie
ncy
GE SE LEP current Total0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
22.3
37.9
55.6
25.1
51.955.2
38.9
51.7
25.8
6.9 5.6
23.2
District NJASK Science Grade 4
Partially ProficientProficientAdvanced Proficient
Subgroups
% P
rofic
ient
Partially Proficent Proficent Advance Proficient0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
25.1
51.7
23.2
9.4
43.447.2
22.7
55.5
21.7
Comparison to the State and DFGGrade 4
OrangeStateDFG
Levels of Proficiency
% o
f Pr
ofici
ency
Grade 8 Cohort Demographics
314 students processed 8 students not present 9 APA students 297 students with valid scores
GE 221 SE 47 LEP 29 current
2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
54.2
46.2
58.7
47.8 48.8
42.1
47.9
38.9
47.8 49.2
3.75.9
2.4 4.42
8th Grade Five Year Summary of District Performance
Partially Proficent Proficient Advance Proficient
% o
f Pro
ficie
ncy
GE SE LEP current Total 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
35.7
83
93.1
48.8
61.5
17
6.9
49.2
2.70 0 2
NJASK Science Grade 8
Partially ProficentProficientAdvanced Proficient
Subgroups
% P
rofic
ient
Partially Proficent Proficent Advance Proficient0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
48.8 49.2
2
23
57.7
19.3
48.3 47.2
4.5
District Compared to State and DFGGrade 8
OrangeStateDFG
Levels of Proficency
% o
f Pr
ofici
ency
Biology Cohort Demographics
260 students processed 18 students not present 242 Students with valid scores
GE 182 SE 38 LEP 22 current
2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
85
100 98
79 79
14
0 2
21 20
9
0 0 0 1
5 year Summary of District Per-formance
Partially Proficient Proficient Advance Proficient
% P
rofic
ienc
y
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
17
7
18
40
0
15
25
9
% Scoring 200+ by grade
2015 2014
Grades
% o
f Stu
dent