1

NGA Advisory Working Group (NAWG)

Meeting February 4, 2016

2

Welcome & Introduction

! Welcome to USGIF Headquarters ! Facility Logistics and Meeting Classification

! Co-Chair’s Welcome

3

Agenda

! Review of NAWG work product decisions ! Update of Govt posture with NAWG

! Review of Sub Working Group progress •  Initial review of draft slides •  Assessing needs of sub working groups •  Assessing cross working group topics •  Synching schedules

! Next Steps

! Wrap Up 4

Reminder of NAWG decisions

! Metrics Discussion – Govt/Ind buy in on both sides (in discussion w/

Govt)

! Tone of presentations (SLIDE based) – Make slides easily understandable – Enlighten on dollar impacts/impact on business

model

! Weekly dial in w/Co Chairs

! Others… 5

Government Update

! Future use of NAWG findings and observations ! Status of Mock Acquisition Panel

– Timing (TBD) – Forum, Process, Length…(TBD) – Government & Industry Participants (TBD)

6

…status will be updated periodically…

Sub Working Group Status

! Innovation ! Clarity

! Communication

! Business Size

! Security

7

Next Steps ! 7 Jan: General Assembly Peer review

!   21 Jan: Co-Chairs and Sub Working Group Leads synch (dial in) !   26 Jan: Co-Chairs and Sub Working Group Leads synch (dial in)

! 4 Feb: pre-brief by sub-committee’s to the NAWG –  18 Feb: Co-Chairs and Sub Working Group Leads synch (dial in) –  24Feb: Final presentations complete –  26 Feb: Final Peer Review –  29 Feb-2 Mar: Recovery and final presentation formatting

! 3 March: Final Round out-brief to NGA

! 7-11 March: Review of Government comments

! 16 March: AFCEA NGA Industry Day

! 20-21 April: Spring Intel Forum

! 16 May: GeoINT (Orlando FL)-Share NAWG results on panels, papers, etc…

8

…sub-committee’s self-governing cadence…

Mock Acq. Panel (TBD)

Process identified for Mock Acq. Panel

Wrap Up

! Today – Initial Work Product review – Target late Feb 2016 for final reviews – Target early Mar 2016 for NGA outbrief

! Next NAWG is 3 Mar, 2016 – Final work product briefings

9

NAWG Co-Chair contact info •  Skip Maselli: Skip.Maselli@Raytheon.com 301-524-6889 •  Jim Kwolek: Jim.Kwolek@ntconcepts.com 636-484-2657

! Websites: http://usgif.org/community/Committees/NAWG

! Sub-Working Groups:

10

Communications: Bob Gadja Bobgadja@aol.com Rob Zitz robert.s.zitz@leidos.com

Innovation: Jane Mardis jmardis@giditalglobe.com Lance Killoran lance@377omega.com

Clairty: Lee Bader baderj@leidos.com Don Bergeson Donald.bergeson@l-3com.com

Business Size: Renard Paulin rpaulin@keywcorp.com Pete Hanson hansonp@ctc.com

Security: Kathy Pherson khp@pherson.org Steve Bailey steve.bailey@s2eas.com

Back Up Slides

11

Charter

! USGIF establishes its NGA Advisory Working Group (NAWG) to bring together professionals from the government and industry, to foster procurement culture through bilateral discussions that advise, recommend and promote actionable ideas for improving the contract procurement process and consequences. This includes improving procurement practices (issuance and evaluation of contract), assessing and mitigating impacts on Industry Health (e.g. loss of industry staff), and driving efficient (timely, relevant, accurate, fair) procurement culture, acquisition landscape, and behaviors between NGA and Industry.

12

Operating Model & Business Rhythm

13

NAWG Process ! Information/Interaction flow

–  1st NAWG assembly meets/vets issues and feeds back to NGA: “what we’ve heard from initial meeting”

•  Vetting of issues in NAWG forum à drives potential “topic action committee” from issues

–  NAWG Leadership provides questions or problem statements to NAWG via Survey Monkey

–  2nd (Next) NAWG general assembly meeting to finalize topic action committees composition/sub-charter

–  Action committees meet monthly (or frequency TBD) –  NAWG Steering Group (TBR) forwards working group analysis to NGA with

perspectives, endorsements, and additional considerations –  NAWG briefs NGA leadership on action committee findings –  Repeat flow as necessary

! Identifying topics for assessment and assigning to Action Teams –  Government or industry identifies a question or problem statement –  Determination: is it appropriate for NAWG? Is another group already addressing? –  For each topic: OCI considerations, policy constraints, external considerations –  Form ad hoc team based on industry sector, business size, functional discipline 14