nfp asu 2018-08 contributions made and received · 2018. 10. 18. · issue 1: exchange vs...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ASU 2018‐08
Not‐for‐Profit Entities (Topic 958): Clarifying the Scope and Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made
![Page 2: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Kimberly DeWoody, CPA
• Baylor University, Bachelors and Masters in Accounting
• Audit Partner –Fort Worth Office and Non‐Profit Practice Leader
• Over twelve years of public accounting experience focused on public and private clients
• Industry focus –non‐profits, manufacturing/distribution, energy, employee benefit plans
[email protected] 817.259.9254
3
![Page 3: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Charlie Kennimer, CPA
• University of Texas at Arlington, Bachelors in Accounting
• Senior Manager –Fort Worth Office
• Over nine years of public accounting experience focused on private clients
• Industry focus –non‐profits, manufacturing/distribution, construction, real estate, employee benefit plans, and healthcare
[email protected] 817.259.9708
4
![Page 4: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Timeline
• August3,2017–FASBissuedtheexposuredraft
• November1,2017–Duedateforcomment letters
• December 13, 2017 – FASB discussed summary of commentsreceivedontheproposedUpdate
• February14,2018–FASBredeliberations
• June21,2018–FASBissuedASU2018‐08
![Page 5: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background
• What is the Objective?– Improve and clarify existing guidance on revenue recognition of grants and contracts by not‐for‐profit entities
• Why?– Long‐standing diversity in practice relating to treatment of grants and contracts as contributions or exchange transactions
• Who does it apply to?– Applies to all entities (NFPs and business entities) that receive or make contributions
– Applies to both contributions received by a recipient and contributions made by a resource provider.
![Page 6: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Effective Date
• For Recipients (early adoption permitted)– NFP that has issued or is a conduit debt obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on exchange, or an over‐the‐counter market
• Annual periods beginning after June 15, 2018
– All other entities• Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018• Calendar year end December 31, 2019• Fiscal year ends 2020 (i.e. June 30, 2020 or September 30, 2020)
![Page 7: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Effective Date
• For Resource Providers, effective date will be delayed by one year– NFP that has issued or is a conduit debt obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on exchange, or an over‐the‐counter market
• Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018
– All other entities• Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019
![Page 8: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Overview
• Step 1: Classifying grants as exchange (reciprocal) or nonexchange (nonreciprocal).
• Step 2: If nonexchange, classify grant as conditional or unconditional.
![Page 9: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange
• Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958‐605 to clarify thescope of contribution accounting and expand the illustrativeexamples– Emphasis on direct, commensurate value to the grantor for reciprocal (exchange) transactions
• Benefit to general public or specified third parties does not equal commensurate benefit to grantor
• Furthering the grantor’s mission does not equal commensurate value to the grantor
– The type of grantor should not override the substance of the transaction
![Page 10: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange
![Page 11: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange
![Page 12: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange
Consideration for government grants– Historically … considered reciprocal as the governmentdoesn’t make contributions and entity is paid for servicesperformedgovernment’sbehalf
– Now… funded by government but activities are carried outfor thebenefitofgeneralpublic
• Likely, will result in more nonreciprocal transactions since noexchangeofcommensuratevalue.
• However, impactonfinancial statementsmaynotbesignificant.
![Page 13: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Issue 2: Conditional vs. Unconditional
• Clarifies and refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958‐605 byindicating that a contribution must satisfy 2 thresholds to beconsideredconditional:
(1) A right of return to the promisor for the transferredassets or a right of release of the promisor from itsobligationto transferassets
AND(2) Abarrier thatmustbeovercomebefore the recipient is
entitled to the assets transferred or promised. A barrierisdescribedthroughtheuseof indicatorsandexamples
![Page 14: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Issue 2: Conditional vs. Unconditional
• IndicatorsofaBarrier:– Measurableperformancerelatedbarrier– Measurableotherbarrier– Relatedtothepurposeof theagreement– Recipienthas limiteddiscretionoverhowthe transferredassetswouldbespent
![Page 15: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Issue 2: Conditional vs. Unconditional
Performance‐relatedandothermeasurablestipulations:• Provideaspecific levelofservice
– Serve1,000mealsperweek inasoupkitchen.• Achievespecificoutcome
– Must lower thehigh‐school dropoutrate to10%.• Raisematchingcontributions ($or%)
– Forevery$1,000contributed,mustraise$500.• Specificevents
– Acompanypromises to contribute$XX if its networthor stockpricereachesaspecific level.
![Page 16: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Issue 2: Conditional vs. Unconditional
Stipulationsthat limit therecipientsdiscretion:• Hire specific individuals as part of workforce conducting theactivity.
• Adhere tospecific researchprotocol.• Follow specific guidelines about qualifying allowableexpenses.– Federal grants that include requirement to comply withfederalcostprincipals.
![Page 17: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Issue 2: Conditional vs. Unconditional
Stipulationsmustrelate tothepurposeof thegrant:• If trivial or administrative conditions that are remote, thenrequirement isnotaCondition.(1) Submit a report to grantor summarizing research
findings• Relatesdirectlytopurpose,couldconstituteabarrier.
(2) Submit a report that indicates how the grantor’sresourceswerespent.
• Relatestoevaluatinggrantcompliance,notabarrier.
![Page 18: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Recognizing Revenue for a Conditional Contribution
• Recipients–When thecontribution isno longer conditional
• Nolongerarightof returnof release• Barrier(s)hasbeenovercome
– Funds received in advance would be recorded as aliability in the recipient‘s books
![Page 19: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• Donors–Contributions made generally should be recognizedby the donor at the same time the recipientrecognizes the contribution received• Donor does not recognize until the contribution hasbecomeunconditional
• Donor follows the same determination criteria as therecipient
Recognizing Expense for a Conditional Contribution
![Page 20: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pop Quiz #1
• Which of the following is a required element of aconditional contributionunder theASU?A. Direct, commensurate valueB. Reciprocal transactionC. Right of return or release from obligations to
transfer assetsD. Limiteddiscretionby thedonor
![Page 21: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pop Quiz #1 Answer
• Which of the following is a required element of aconditional contributionunder theASU?A. Direct, commensurate valueB. Reciprocal transactionC. Right of return or release from obligations to
transferassetsD. Limiteddiscretionby thedonor
![Page 22: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Transactions from Third Party Payers
• Does the payment represent a new, separatetransaction?
• Is thereanexisting reciprocal transaction?
• WouldNOTbeconsidered revenueby the recipient
• Would only flow through the statement of financialposition
![Page 23: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Example 1: Exchange Transaction vs. Conditional Contribution
• Scenario:– University A was awarded a 3‐year grant from NationalInstitutesofHealth (NIH) to funddiabetes research
– Terms of the grant include a line‐item budget that requiresUniversity A to incur certain qualifying expenses and followall relevant federal regulations
– UniversityA forfeits fundsnotusedwithin the3‐yearperiod– UniversityAretains therights to theresearch findings
![Page 24: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Accounting under current GAAP:– University A concluded that NIH receives commensuratevalue through the societal benefit to the public from theresearchandpotential cure fordiabetes
– University A accounts for this grant as an exchangetransaction and records unrestricted revenue as it incursexpenses
Example 1: Exchange Transaction vs. Conditional Contribution
![Page 25: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Analysis under the ASU:– No commensurate value received by NIH. Transaction is acontribution.
– Agreement has a measurable barrier (qualifying expenses)and limited discretion (federal regulations) AND a right torelease fromobligation. Contribution is conditional.
– Use of the funds it limited to funding diabetes research.Contribution isdonor‐restricted.
Example 1: Exchange Transaction vs. Conditional Contribution
![Page 26: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Accounting under the ASU:– University A would record revenue in donor restricted netassets as it incurs qualifying expenses. Incurring theseexpenses would also trigger recording net assets releasedfromrestrictions.
– If University A has a policy to report contributions whoserestrictions are met in the same reporting period asunrestricted, it would record grant revenue as unrestrictedandtherewouldbenonetassets releasedfromrestrictions.
Example 1: Exchange Transaction vs. Conditional Contribution
![Page 27: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Example 2: Unconditional vs. Conditional Contribution
• Scenario:– NFP B was awarded a 2‐year $100,000 grant fromFoundation C to provide meals to children and mothers inneed
– Grant requires NFP B to use the funds to provide 200,000meals. The agreement specifies a pro rata right of return formealsnot servedwithin the2‐yearperiod.
![Page 28: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• Accounting under current GAAP:– NFPBconcludes that thetransaction isacontribution– NFP B routinely serves 1 million meals annually and viewsthe likelihood of not meeting the condition of providing200,000meals as remote. The contributionswas deemed tobeunconditionalanddonor restricted
– NFP B records donor restricted revenue for $100,000 uponreceiptof thegrantagreement
Example 2: Unconditional vs. Conditional Contribution
![Page 29: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• Analysis under the ASU:– NFP B concludes the transaction is a donor‐restrictedcontribution
– However, the requirement to provide 200,000 meals is abarrier that must be overcome. Also, there is a right ofreturn. NFP B concludes that this is a conditionalcontribution.
– NFP B would record a liability for any funds received inadvanceand recorddonor restricted revenue (andnetassetsreleased)as themealsareserved.
Example 2: Unconditional vs. Conditional Contribution
![Page 30: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Pop Quiz #2
• Whichof the following isNOTan IndicatorofaBarrier?A. Donor will grant NFP $50,000 if the NFP also raises
$50,000 tomatchB. Donorwill grantNFP$100,000during thenext2years ,
but the NFP has to refund the money if it is not spentwithin the2years
C. Donor will grant NFP $150,000 if 1,000 studentsreceiveaminimumstandardizedtest score
D. Donor will grant NFP $200,000 but the NFP may onlyapply the funds toqualifiedexpense
![Page 31: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Pop Quiz #2 Answer
• Whichof the following isNOTan IndicatorofaBarrier?A. Donor will grant NFP $50,000 if the NFP also raises
$50,000 tomatchB. Donorwill grantNFP$100,000 during thenext 2 years,
but the NFP has to refund the money if it is not spentwithin the2years
C. Donor will grant NFP $150,000 if 1,000 studentsreceiveaminimumstandardizedtest score
D. Donor will grant NFP $200,000 but the NFP may onlyapply the funds toqualifiedexpense
![Page 32: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Cheat Sheet: Steps for Analyzing Transactions
1. Is the agreement a Contribution or anExchange transaction?
2. If it is a contribution, is the contributionConditionalorUnconditional?
3. If the contribution, is unconditional is itDonorRestrictedorUnrestricted?
![Page 33: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• NFP Research University was awarded $1M grant from apharmaceutical company to finance the costs of a clinical trial ofanexperimentalcancerdrug
• Pharma Co specifies the protocol for testing, number ofparticipants to be tested, dosages to be administered andfrequencyandnatureof followups
• Pharma Co requires a detailed report of the test outcome andrights tostudybelongtoPharmaCo.
• Is the$1Macontributionorexchangetransaction?
![Page 35: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• Answer: Exchange
• Why?–Pharma Co. is receiving commensurate value asthe resourceprovided.
Contribution or Exchange?
![Page 36: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• Mary is enrolled at University A.Mary’s total tuition charged forthesemester is$30,000.
• Mary received a grant in the amount of $2,000 to use towardthe tuition fee,which is paiddirectly by thegrantor toUniversityA.
• Is the $2,000 received by University A a contribution orexchangetransaction?
![Page 37: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• Answer: Neither
• Why?– ThegrantwasawardedtoMary,not toUniversityA.– Mary and University A have an exchange transaction.The $2,000 grant does not create additional revenuebut, rather, serves as a partial payment against the$30,000duetoUniversityA.
![Page 38: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• Local government provides funding to a NFP C to perform aresearchstudyonthebenefitsofa longerschoolyear.
• NFP C plans the study, performs research and summarizes andsubmits theresearchto the localgovernment.
• Localgovernmentretains therights to thestudy.
• Is the fundingacontributionorexchange?
![Page 39: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• Answer: Exchange
• Why?– NFP has a procurement arrangement andcommensuratevalue isbeingexchanged.
– Localgovernmentretains therights to thestudy.
![Page 40: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• NFP University applied for and was awarded a grant from thefederalgovernment
• NFP U must follow the rules and regulations established byUniformGuidanceandtheawardingagency
• NFP U is required to incur qualified expenses to be entitled tothe assets and any unspent money during the specified time isforfeited
• NFPU is required to submit a summaryof research findings, butNFPUretains therights to the findings
• Is thegrantacontributionorexchange?
![Page 41: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Contribution or Exchange?
• Answer: Contribution
• Why?– Commensuratevalue isNOTbeingexchanged.– University retains the rights to the research and findingsand the University as well as public receive primarybenefit.
![Page 42: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional?
• NFP B is a hospital that has a research program. NFP B appliesfor and receives a $300K grant from a federal agency to fundthyroidcancer research.
• Terms of the grant include a standard budget and specify thatNFP B must incur qualifying expenses in compliance withUniformGuidanceandtheawardingagency
• The grant is paid on a reimbursement basis and requires anannualaudit
• Any unused assets are forfeited and any unallowed costs thathavebeendrawndownmustberefunded
• Is thecontributionconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 43: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer: Conditional
• Why:– LimiteddiscretionbyNFPdue to requirement tospend on qualifying expenses and right ofrelease.
![Page 44: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional?
• NFPEworkswith gluten‐relatedallergies aspart of its overallmission.It applied for and received a $100K grant from a foundation toperformresearchongluten‐relatedallergiesover thenextyear.
• Agreement includesarightof return• Agreement indicates that the general budget submitted with the
grant proposal must be followed or that approval must be obtainedfromthefoundationforsignificantdeviations inspending
• Agreement requires at the end of the grant period a report must befiledexplaininghowtheassetswerespent
• Is thecontributionconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 45: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer: Unconditional&DonorRestricted
• Why:–Norequirementswhich indicate abarrier.–Assets must be used for purpose which isnarrower thanoverallmission.
![Page 46: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional?
• NFP F is a hospital that received an upfront cash contributionfrom an individual to perform research on Alzheimer’s diseaseduring thenextyear.
• Theagreementdoesnot includearightof return
• Is thecontributionconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 47: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer: Unconditional&DonorRestricted
• Why:–Noright of return.–Assets must be used for purpose which isnarrower thanoverallmission.
![Page 48: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional?
• NFP J operates a homeless shelter and provides meals to thehomeless.
• NFPJ receivesanupfrontgrantof$75K fromadonor.• The grant requires NFP J to use the assets to provide 5,000meals to thehomeless.
• The grant contains a right of return for meals not served andtherearenominimumthresholds.
• Is thecontributionconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 49: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer: Conditional
• Why:–Agreement has a measurable performance‐related barrier (provide 5,000meals) and a rightof return.
![Page 50: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Foundation A givesNFPD a grant in the amount of $400,000 toprovidespecificcareer training todisabledveterans.
• Grant requires NFP D to provide training to at least 8,000disabled veterans during the next fiscal year (2,000 during eachquarter), with specific minimum targets that must bemet eachquarter.
• FoundationA specifies a right of release fromtheobligation thatit will only give NFP D $100,000 each quarter if NFP Ddemonstrates that those services havebeenprovided to at least2,000disabledveteransduringthequarter.
• Is thegrantconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 51: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer: Conditional
• Why:–Agreement has a measurable performance‐related barrier (2,000 disabled veterans perquarter)and right of releaseofobligation.
![Page 52: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Foundation B receives a grant proposal from an animalrescue facility, NFP F, which requests a 2‐year grant in theamount of $500,000 upfront to be used to expand itsoperations.
• Theagreement indicates thatNFP Fmust expand its facilityby at least 5,000 square feet to accommodate additionalanimalsby theendof the2years.
• The grant contains a right of return if the minimumexpansiontarget isnotachieved.
• Is thegrantconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 53: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer: Conditional
• Why?– Includes a measurable barrier that must beachieved to be entitled to the assets and a rightof return for unused assets or unmetrequirements.
![Page 54: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Conditionalor Unconditional?
• NFP G is conducting a capital campaign to build a new building andmake improvements to its existing building, including a new HVACsystemandanupgradedtelephoneandcomputernetwork
• NFPG receives an upfront grant of $10K fromaprivate foundation inresponsetoaproposal submittedaspartof itscapital campaign
• Includes a right or return if the funds are not used for the purposesoutlined inthecapital campaignsolicitationmaterials
• Donordoesnot includeany specificationsonhowthebuilding shouldbeconstructedorhowother improvementsshouldbemade
• Is thecontributionconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 55: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer:Unconditional&Donor restricted
• Why?– Agreementplaces limits onlyon the specific activity thatis being funded and resource provideddoes not includeanyspecifications.
– Donor restricted because it must be used for capitalpurposes.
![Page 56: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• NFPHisamuseumthatownsthe land it ison.Adonorrespondedtoagrantsolicitation from NFP H to build a new wing onto the existing museumbuilding.
• Agreementcontainsa$1Mmultiyearpromise togive themoney tobeusedforthenewwing
• Agreement includes specificbuilding requirements, includingsquare footageandenvironmentalspecifications
• The first installment of the gift will not be paid until NFP H submitsarchitecturaldesignsthatmeettherequirements
• Additional installments will be paid in specified increments upon meetingspecificrequirements
• If thebuilding isnotbuilt incompliancewith thegrantagreement, thedonorisreleasedfromitsobligationtomakeinstallmentpayments
• Isthecontributionconditionalorunconditional?
![Page 57: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• Answer:Conditional
• Why?–NFP is not entitled to the assets until amilestone is met (measurable performancebarrierand releaseofobligation)
![Page 58: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Conditional or Unconditional
• NFP H is a recreational organization that provides various sportsprogramstochildrenthat live inthecommunity.
• NFP H receives an upfront grant in the amount of $40,000 from afoundationtobeusedtowarditstennisprogram.
• Consistent with NFP H’s grant proposal, the agreement includesspecific guidelines for could use of the assets (for example, to hire 10tennis instructorsortoprovideasummercampfor9weeks)
• Agreementdoesnot specify thatNFPH’sentitlement to the$40,000 isdependent upon NFP H meeting any of the specific indicatedguidelines intheagreement.
• The grant contains a right of return for funds not spent on the tennisprogram.
![Page 59: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Conditional vs. Unconditional
• Answer:Unconditional&Donor restricted
• Why?–Nobarrier toovercome.–Donor restricted because it must be used fortennis program, which is narrower than overallmission.
![Page 60: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Contribution of an Interest in an Estate
• In 19X0, Individual notifies Church F that she has rememberedthechurch inherwill andprovidesawrittencopyofthewill.
• In19X5, Individualdies.• In 19X6, Individual’s last will and testament enters probate and
the probate court declares the will valid. The executor informsChurch F that the will has been declared valid and that it willreceive 10 percent of Individual’s estate, after satisfying theestate’s liabilitiesandcertainspecificbequests.
• The executor provides an estimate of the estate’s assets andliabilities and the expected amount and time for payment ofChurchF’s interest intheestate.
![Page 61: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Contribution of an Interest in an Estate
• The 19X0 communication between Individual and Church F specifiedan intention to give. The ability to modify a will at any time prior todeath is well established; thus in 19X0 Church F did not receive apromisetogiveanddidnotrecognizeacontributionreceived.
• When the probate court declares the will valid, Church F wouldrecognize a receivable and revenue for an unconditional promise togiveatthefairvalueof its interest intheestate.
• If thepromisetogivecontained in thevalidwillwas insteadconditionalbased on a barrier thatmust be overcome for Church F to be entitledto the assets, Church F would recognize the contribution when thecondition was substantially met. A conditional promise in a valid willwouldbedisclosedinnotestofinancialstatements.
![Page 62: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Transition Approach
• Modified Prospective Approach– Apply to agreements that are either
(1) Incomplete as of the effective dateor
(2) Entered into after the effective date
– No restatement of prior amounts recognized
• Retrospective application is permitted
62
![Page 63: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Transition Approach
• TransitionDisclosures– Nature of, and reason for, the change in accountingprinciple
– Reasons for significant changes in each financialstatement line item in the current reporting periodresulting fromtheamendments
63
![Page 64: NFP ASU 2018-08 Contributions Made and Received · 2018. 10. 18. · Issue 1: Exchange vs Nonexchange • Refines existing guidance in Subtopic 958 ‐605 to clarify the scope of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071100/5fd90c9ea9d77d612860f729/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Questions
64