nextrail kc: phase ii streetcar expansion plan (book 3 of 3)

Phase II streetcar exPansIon Plan

NextRail KC

aPPendIx 2 of 2

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

489

appendix 4: FiNaNCe1. SuMMaRy taBle OF FeDeRal, State, PRiVate, COuNty,

aND lOCal FuNDS2. tRaNSPORtatiON DeVelOPMeNt DiStRiCt BOND RuNS

WitH aND WitHOut CCROW3. tRaNSPORtatiON DeVelOPMeNt DiStRiCt ReVeNue taBle

WitH aND WitHOut CCROW

490

table 16.1 possIble FundIng souRces FoR stReetcaR and Related ImpRoVements

FedeRalsouRce pRogRam descRIptIon oR concept FundIng InFoRmatIon applIcabIlItY

new staRts/small staRts pRogRam (49 u.s.c. sectIon 5309 FIxed guIdewaY capItal InVestment gRants)

Fta, through the capital investment Grant program, which includes the new Starts and Small Starts programs, provides funds to transit project sponsors to build new or expanded fixed-guideway transit systems.

note: resource utilized along with tiGer funding for streetcar in cincinnati, charlotte, St. Louis, new york, chicago and for Brt in Stamford, ct.

in Fy 2012 the new Starts and Bus programs were not partially earmarked, leaving unallocated funds. Unallocated funds are available for allocation through a discretionary competitive award process.

capital infrastructure; acquisition of real property, initial acquisition of rolling stock for the systems, acquisition of rights-of-way, and relocation.

FedeRal tRansIt uRban FoRmula gRants (49 u.s.c. sectIon 5307)

Formula grants that fund public transportation capital projects in urbanized areas to finance the planning, acquisition, construction, cost-effective lease, improvement, and maintenance of equipment and facilities for use in transit. one percent of the funds apportioned to urbanized areas with a population of at least 200,000 must be expended for associated transit improvements. the Governor, responsible local officials, and publicly owned operators of mass transportation services, must jointly select the designated recipient for an urbanized area with a population of 200,000 or more.

note: resource utilized for St. Louis trolley Loop.

requires 10% match. Federal share cannot exceed 80% of the net project cost. the Federal share may be 90% for the cost of vehicle-related equipment attributable to compliance with the american with Disabilities act and the clean air act or 85% for the cost of a vehicle that complies with these requirements. the federal share may also be 90% for projects or portions of projects related to bicycles facilities. the Federal share of the eligible operating cost is 50%.

Fy 14 estimated obligation is $4,458,650,000. range of financial assistance is typically $10,890 to $1,293,611. average is $180,588.

Flexible.

new maRkets tax cRedIts

Federal tax incentive that attracts investment capital to low-income communities by permitting individual and corporate investors to receive a 39% tax credit against their Federal income tax return in exchange for making equity investments in a recognized community development entity (cDe). reduces borrowing costs and enables higher risk loans and investments that shoulder collateral shortfalls and credit risks. city would retain ownership of the right-of-way but would lease the immovable infrastructure.

note: new Markets credits used for improvements to new york’s transit system.

a national allocatee (such as LiSc) typically receives allocation between $85 and $133 million. Kc cDe also receives annual allocation, although lesser in amount.

immovable capital infrastructure (track, catenary, and stations) that is located within a qualified census tract (based upon recent census data, eligible alignments would include only independence avenue and Linwood Boulevard); mixed-use and transit-oriented developments.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

491

table 16.1 possIble FundIng souRces FoR stReetcaR and Related ImpRoVements

FedeRalsouRce pRogRam descRIptIon oR concept FundIng InFoRmatIon applIcabIlItY

new staRts/small staRts pRogRam (49 u.s.c. sectIon 5309 FIxed guIdewaY capItal InVestment gRants)

Fta, through the capital investment Grant program, which includes the new Starts and Small Starts programs, provides funds to transit project sponsors to build new or expanded fixed-guideway transit systems.

note: resource utilized along with tiGer funding for streetcar in cincinnati, charlotte, St. Louis, new york, chicago and for Brt in Stamford, ct.

in Fy 2012 the new Starts and Bus programs were not partially earmarked, leaving unallocated funds. Unallocated funds are available for allocation through a discretionary competitive award process.

capital infrastructure; acquisition of real property, initial acquisition of rolling stock for the systems, acquisition of rights-of-way, and relocation.

FedeRal tRansIt uRban FoRmula gRants (49 u.s.c. sectIon 5307)

Formula grants that fund public transportation capital projects in urbanized areas to finance the planning, acquisition, construction, cost-effective lease, improvement, and maintenance of equipment and facilities for use in transit. one percent of the funds apportioned to urbanized areas with a population of at least 200,000 must be expended for associated transit improvements. the Governor, responsible local officials, and publicly owned operators of mass transportation services, must jointly select the designated recipient for an urbanized area with a population of 200,000 or more.

note: resource utilized for St. Louis trolley Loop.

requires 10% match. Federal share cannot exceed 80% of the net project cost. the Federal share may be 90% for the cost of vehicle-related equipment attributable to compliance with the american with Disabilities act and the clean air act or 85% for the cost of a vehicle that complies with these requirements. the federal share may also be 90% for projects or portions of projects related to bicycles facilities. the Federal share of the eligible operating cost is 50%.

Fy 14 estimated obligation is $4,458,650,000. range of financial assistance is typically $10,890 to $1,293,611. average is $180,588.

Flexible.

new maRkets tax cRedIts

Federal tax incentive that attracts investment capital to low-income communities by permitting individual and corporate investors to receive a 39% tax credit against their Federal income tax return in exchange for making equity investments in a recognized community development entity (cDe). reduces borrowing costs and enables higher risk loans and investments that shoulder collateral shortfalls and credit risks. city would retain ownership of the right-of-way but would lease the immovable infrastructure.

note: new Markets credits used for improvements to new york’s transit system.

a national allocatee (such as LiSc) typically receives allocation between $85 and $133 million. Kc cDe also receives annual allocation, although lesser in amount.

immovable capital infrastructure (track, catenary, and stations) that is located within a qualified census tract (based upon recent census data, eligible alignments would include only independence avenue and Linwood Boulevard); mixed-use and transit-oriented developments.

492

souRce pRogRam descRIptIon oR concept FundIng InFoRmatIon applIcabIlItY

pRomIse zones (hud) a 10-year federal designation to support high-poverty areas. community must have overall poverty rate of at least 20% and one census tract with a poverty rate over 30%. the boundaries have to spread over more than one contiguous census tract and have between 10,000 and 200,000 residents. a promise zone is an overlay program to federal grant area designed to provide an intensive and layered approach to revitalizing communities. For communities selected, the federal government will partner to help the promise zones access the resources and expertise they need. currently, there are only 6 promise zones. the obama administration will designate 14 more communities over the next three years.

an existing boundary of a current promise neighborhoods or choice neighborhoods implementation grant or Byrne criminal justice innovation grant must be encompassed within the proposed promise zone boundaries, and the lead grantee and major partner or partners implementing activities under those grants must play substantial roles in the promise zone application, such as lead applicant, implementation partner or other partner making significant commitments.

at present, the only area in Kansas city potentially qualified to be designated as a promise zone is at the location of the Byrne criminal justice assistance Grant (from 27th to 39th, paseo to Benton).

Undetermined. pending Housing authority choice neighborhood implementation Grant, if secured, could potentially allocate up to 20% or $4.5 million of grant to streetcar (existing plan would likely have to be amended to designate transit within the neighborhood revitalization focus. Under current plan, transit is mentioned but not a focus). requires city match. could potentially use streetcar property tax and sales tax as part of the local match for choice neighborhoods implementation Grant, and use the 20% or $4.5 million choice allocation to fund the streetcar and related appurtenances within zone.

capital infrastructure projects within zone, including bus rapid transit lanes and bike lanes, and transit-oriented development (toD) that attracts new businesses and creates jobs. prospect Maxx improvements within zone.

Might also be able to use portions of leveraged grant funds to endow or attract private investment into taxpayer assistance fund.

Fhwa tRanspoRtatIon InFRastRuctuRe FInance and InnoVatIon act FundIng (tIFIa)

Federal credit assistance in the form of direct loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit to finance surface transportation projects of national and regional significance. tiFia credit assistance provides improved access to capital markets, flexible repayment terms, and potentially more favorable interest rates than can be found in private capital markets for similar instruments. tiFia can help advance qualified, large-scale projects that otherwise might be delayed or deferred because of size, complexity, or uncertainty over the timing of revenues.

eligible transit projects include the design and construction of stations, track, and transit-related infrastructure, purchase of transit vehicles, and any other type of project that is eligible for grant assistance under chapter 53 of title 49 of the United States code.

an eligible project must have a cost of at least $50 million. Federal funding cannot exceed 33% of eligible costs or the amount of senior debt, if the tiFia loan does not have an investment grade rating. the project must have a dedicated revenue source to pledge as repayment on the tiFia loan (many different types, including sales tax, tax increment finance, and fuel taxes). tiFia often used in p3 transactions.

$750 million in Fy 2013 and $1 billion in Fy 2014. additional funds may also be available from budget authority carried over from previous fiscal years. any budget authority not obligated in the fiscal year for which it is authorized remains available for obligation in subsequent years. Subject to an annual obligation limitation.

each dollar of Federal funds can provide up to $10 in tiFia credit assistance - and leverage $30 in transportation infrastructure investment.

capital infrastructure.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

493


pRomIse zones (hud) a 10-year federal designation to support high-poverty areas. community must have overall poverty rate of at least 20% and one census tract with a poverty rate over 30%. the boundaries have to spread over more than one contiguous census tract and have between 10,000 and 200,000 residents. a promise zone is an overlay program to federal grant area designed to provide an intensive and layered approach to revitalizing communities. For communities selected, the federal government will partner to help the promise zones access the resources and expertise they need. currently, there are only 6 promise zones. the obama administration will designate 14 more communities over the next three years.

an existing boundary of a current promise neighborhoods or choice neighborhoods implementation grant or Byrne criminal justice innovation grant must be encompassed within the proposed promise zone boundaries, and the lead grantee and major partner or partners implementing activities under those grants must play substantial roles in the promise zone application, such as lead applicant, implementation partner or other partner making significant commitments.

at present, the only area in Kansas city potentially qualified to be designated as a promise zone is at the location of the Byrne criminal justice assistance Grant (from 27th to 39th, paseo to Benton).

Undetermined. pending Housing authority choice neighborhood implementation Grant, if secured, could potentially allocate up to 20% or $4.5 million of grant to streetcar (existing plan would likely have to be amended to designate transit within the neighborhood revitalization focus. Under current plan, transit is mentioned but not a focus). requires city match. could potentially use streetcar property tax and sales tax as part of the local match for choice neighborhoods implementation Grant, and use the 20% or $4.5 million choice allocation to fund the streetcar and related appurtenances within zone.

capital infrastructure projects within zone, including bus rapid transit lanes and bike lanes, and transit-oriented development (toD) that attracts new businesses and creates jobs. prospect Maxx improvements within zone.

Might also be able to use portions of leveraged grant funds to endow or attract private investment into taxpayer assistance fund.

Fhwa tRanspoRtatIon InFRastRuctuRe FInance and InnoVatIon act FundIng (tIFIa)

Federal credit assistance in the form of direct loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit to finance surface transportation projects of national and regional significance. tiFia credit assistance provides improved access to capital markets, flexible repayment terms, and potentially more favorable interest rates than can be found in private capital markets for similar instruments. tiFia can help advance qualified, large-scale projects that otherwise might be delayed or deferred because of size, complexity, or uncertainty over the timing of revenues.

eligible transit projects include the design and construction of stations, track, and transit-related infrastructure, purchase of transit vehicles, and any other type of project that is eligible for grant assistance under chapter 53 of title 49 of the United States code.

an eligible project must have a cost of at least $50 million. Federal funding cannot exceed 33% of eligible costs or the amount of senior debt, if the tiFia loan does not have an investment grade rating. the project must have a dedicated revenue source to pledge as repayment on the tiFia loan (many different types, including sales tax, tax increment finance, and fuel taxes). tiFia often used in p3 transactions.

$750 million in Fy 2013 and $1 billion in Fy 2014. additional funds may also be available from budget authority carried over from previous fiscal years. any budget authority not obligated in the fiscal year for which it is authorized remains available for obligation in subsequent years. Subject to an annual obligation limitation.

each dollar of Federal funds can provide up to $10 in tiFia credit assistance - and leverage $30 in transportation infrastructure investment.


494


Fhwa state InFRastRuctuRe banks

SiBs are revolving infrastructure investment funds for surface transportation projects that are established and administered by states. Much like a private bank, SiBs offer a range of loans and credit assistance enhancement products to public and private sponsors of title 49 transit capital projects. a title 49 capital project is one that provides “regular and continuing shared-ride surface transportation services that are open to the general public or open to a segment of the general public defined by age, disability, or low income.”

previously, states participating in the SiB program could capitalize in its transit account up to 10 percent of federal funds made available for capital projects under Urbanized area Formula Grants, capital investment Grants, and Formula Grants for other than Urbanized areas. Map-21 has not allowed new 2013-2014 funding to be used to capitalize SiBs.

Missouri created a SiB in 1998 under tea-21.

a state must match the Federal funds used to capitalize the SiB on an 80-20 Federal/non-Federal basis. States also have the opportunity to contribute additional state or local funds beyond the required nonfederal match.


buIld ameRIca bonds provide state and local governments with a new, direct federal payment subsidy for a portion of the borrowing costs on taxable bonds. BaBs provide a deeper federal subsidy to state and local governments (equal to 35% of the taxable borrowing cost) than traditional tax-exempt bonds that leads to lower net borrowing costs for state and local governments.

From the inception of the program in april 2009 through May 31, 2010, over $106 billion of BaBs have been issued by state and local governments in 49 states, the District of columbia and two territories. the pace of issuances remains steady today.

capital projects including transportation infrastructure.

congestIon mItIgatIon and aIR qualItY ImpRoVement (cmaq)

provides funding for projects and programs in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas for ozone, carbon monoxide (co), and particulate matter (pM-10, pM-2.5) that reduce transportation related emissions. [23 USc 149(a)].

cMaq funds are directed toward projects, programs, and operational strategies that provide residents with transportation options, to make the most effective use of existing facilities, and lead to lower pollution levels.States and Mpos are direct recipients.

cMaq funds are directed toward projects, programs, and operational strategies that provide residents with transportation options, to make the most effective use of existing facilities, and lead to lower pollution levels.

Federal share is generally 80%, subject to sliding scale. certain other activities, including transit vehicles, are eligible to receive a Federal share of 100%.

transit improvements, expanded authority for transit operations, and support for installation of facilities serving electric or natural gas fueled vehicles (not at rest areas).

eneRgY tax cRedIts tax incentives for private investment in certain energy technologies, and energy payments that can be used in lieu of certain tax credits. these incentives promote deployment of energy efficient or alternative energy technologies, which may help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

could potentially be coupled with a p3 financing to leverage unrestricted funding for streetcar.

$5.129 million in Fy 2014. energy efficiency technologies utilized in transit capital infrastructure or operations, as well as collateral toD projects.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

495


Fhwa state InFRastRuctuRe banks

SiBs are revolving infrastructure investment funds for surface transportation projects that are established and administered by states. Much like a private bank, SiBs offer a range of loans and credit assistance enhancement products to public and private sponsors of title 49 transit capital projects. a title 49 capital project is one that provides “regular and continuing shared-ride surface transportation services that are open to the general public or open to a segment of the general public defined by age, disability, or low income.”

previously, states participating in the SiB program could capitalize in its transit account up to 10 percent of federal funds made available for capital projects under Urbanized area Formula Grants, capital investment Grants, and Formula Grants for other than Urbanized areas. Map-21 has not allowed new 2013-2014 funding to be used to capitalize SiBs.

Missouri created a SiB in 1998 under tea-21.

a state must match the Federal funds used to capitalize the SiB on an 80-20 Federal/non-Federal basis. States also have the opportunity to contribute additional state or local funds beyond the required nonfederal match.


buIld ameRIca bonds provide state and local governments with a new, direct federal payment subsidy for a portion of the borrowing costs on taxable bonds. BaBs provide a deeper federal subsidy to state and local governments (equal to 35% of the taxable borrowing cost) than traditional tax-exempt bonds that leads to lower net borrowing costs for state and local governments.

From the inception of the program in april 2009 through May 31, 2010, over $106 billion of BaBs have been issued by state and local governments in 49 states, the District of columbia and two territories. the pace of issuances remains steady today.

capital projects including transportation infrastructure.

congestIon mItIgatIon and aIR qualItY ImpRoVement (cmaq)

provides funding for projects and programs in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas for ozone, carbon monoxide (co), and particulate matter (pM-10, pM-2.5) that reduce transportation related emissions. [23 USc 149(a)].

cMaq funds are directed toward projects, programs, and operational strategies that provide residents with transportation options, to make the most effective use of existing facilities, and lead to lower pollution levels.States and Mpos are direct recipients.

cMaq funds are directed toward projects, programs, and operational strategies that provide residents with transportation options, to make the most effective use of existing facilities, and lead to lower pollution levels.

Federal share is generally 80%, subject to sliding scale. certain other activities, including transit vehicles, are eligible to receive a Federal share of 100%.

transit improvements, expanded authority for transit operations, and support for installation of facilities serving electric or natural gas fueled vehicles (not at rest areas).

eneRgY tax cRedIts tax incentives for private investment in certain energy technologies, and energy payments that can be used in lieu of certain tax credits. these incentives promote deployment of energy efficient or alternative energy technologies, which may help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

could potentially be coupled with a p3 financing to leverage unrestricted funding for streetcar.

$5.129 million in Fy 2014. energy efficiency technologies utilized in transit capital infrastructure or operations, as well as collateral toD projects.

496


hud sectIon 108 loan guaRantee pRogRam

Section 108 is the loan guarantee provision of the community Development Block Grant (cDBG) program. Section 108 provides states and communities with a source of financing for economic development, public facilities, and large-scale physical development projects. all projects and activities must either principally benefit low- and moderate-income persons, aid in the elimination or prevention of slums and blight or meet urgent needs of the community.

this makes it one of the most potent and important public investment tools that HUD offers to states and local governments. it allows them to transform a small portion of their cDBG funds into federally guaranteed loans large enough to pursue physical and economic revitalization projects that can renew entire neighborhoods.

entitlement public entities. an entitlement public entity may apply for up to five times the public entity’s latest approved cDBG entitlement amount, minus any outstanding Section 108 commitments and/or principal balances of Section 108 loans.

a state or a non-entitlement public entity may apply for up to five times the latest approved cDBG amount received by its State, minus any outstanding Section 108 commitments and/or principal balances on Section 108 loans for which the State has pledged its cDBG funds as security.

eligible projects include, among others, economic development activities eligible under cDBG; construction, reconstruction, or installation of public facilities (including street, sidewalk, and other site improvements); payment of interest on the guaranteed loan and issuance costs of public offerings; and debt service reserves.

eeRe eneRgY eFFIcIencY and Renewable eneRgY technologY deploYment, demonstRatIon, and commeRcIalIzatIon gRant pRogRam

Financial assistance for the technology deployment, demonstration, and commercialization of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies. this includes infrastructure and vehicle technologies. qualified applicants include state governments.

Fy 2014 budget request does not provide details on this program.

efficiency operations.

economIc deVelopment admInIstRatIon (eda) dIscRetIonaRY Funds and gRants

Strategic grant investments to support the implementation of regional economic development strategies designed to create jobs, leverage private capital, encourage economic development, and strengthen america’s ability to compete in the global marketplace. Solicits applications from urban communities to develop initiatives that advance new ideas and creative approaches to address rapidly evolving economic conditions. city or (related) not for profit entity may be applicant and recipient.

no award ceiling or program funding available. next funding cycles are june 13, 2014 for funding cycle 4 of Fy 2014; and october 17, 2014 for funding cycle 1 of Fy 2015.

capital public works and economic development facilities.

economIc deVelopment admInIstRatIon global clImate change mItIgatIon IncentIVe Fund

Grants for projects that foster economic development by advancing the green economy in distressed communities and creating jobs through, and increase private capital investment in, efforts to limit the nation’s dependence on fossil fuels, enhance energy efficiency, curb greenhouse gas emissions and protect natural systems. Grants available to state and local governments. eDa targets its investments to promote the attraction of private capital investment and the creation and retention of long-term jobs.

$25 million in Fy 2011. requires 50% match. Grants made quarterly via eDc’s regional offices. no Fy 2014 data available.

eligible projects include infrastructure investments that involve the greening of an existing function or process. investments must result in green enhancements to the resource, energy, water, and/or waste, or efficiency of an existing function or process. the enhancements reflect changes to the lifecycle process of an existing function so that the function is performed in a more sustainable manner.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

497


hud sectIon 108 loan guaRantee pRogRam

Section 108 is the loan guarantee provision of the community Development Block Grant (cDBG) program. Section 108 provides states and communities with a source of financing for economic development, public facilities, and large-scale physical development projects. all projects and activities must either principally benefit low- and moderate-income persons, aid in the elimination or prevention of slums and blight or meet urgent needs of the community.

this makes it one of the most potent and important public investment tools that HUD offers to states and local governments. it allows them to transform a small portion of their cDBG funds into federally guaranteed loans large enough to pursue physical and economic revitalization projects that can renew entire neighborhoods.

entitlement public entities. an entitlement public entity may apply for up to five times the public entity’s latest approved cDBG entitlement amount, minus any outstanding Section 108 commitments and/or principal balances of Section 108 loans.

a state or a non-entitlement public entity may apply for up to five times the latest approved cDBG amount received by its State, minus any outstanding Section 108 commitments and/or principal balances on Section 108 loans for which the State has pledged its cDBG funds as security.

eligible projects include, among others, economic development activities eligible under cDBG; construction, reconstruction, or installation of public facilities (including street, sidewalk, and other site improvements); payment of interest on the guaranteed loan and issuance costs of public offerings; and debt service reserves.

eeRe eneRgY eFFIcIencY and Renewable eneRgY technologY deploYment, demonstRatIon, and commeRcIalIzatIon gRant pRogRam

Financial assistance for the technology deployment, demonstration, and commercialization of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies. this includes infrastructure and vehicle technologies. qualified applicants include state governments.

Fy 2014 budget request does not provide details on this program.

efficiency operations.

economIc deVelopment admInIstRatIon (eda) dIscRetIonaRY Funds and gRants

Strategic grant investments to support the implementation of regional economic development strategies designed to create jobs, leverage private capital, encourage economic development, and strengthen america’s ability to compete in the global marketplace. Solicits applications from urban communities to develop initiatives that advance new ideas and creative approaches to address rapidly evolving economic conditions. city or (related) not for profit entity may be applicant and recipient.

no award ceiling or program funding available. next funding cycles are june 13, 2014 for funding cycle 4 of Fy 2014; and october 17, 2014 for funding cycle 1 of Fy 2015.

capital public works and economic development facilities.

economIc deVelopment admInIstRatIon global clImate change mItIgatIon IncentIVe Fund

Grants for projects that foster economic development by advancing the green economy in distressed communities and creating jobs through, and increase private capital investment in, efforts to limit the nation’s dependence on fossil fuels, enhance energy efficiency, curb greenhouse gas emissions and protect natural systems. Grants available to state and local governments. eDa targets its investments to promote the attraction of private capital investment and the creation and retention of long-term jobs.

$25 million in Fy 2011. requires 50% match. Grants made quarterly via eDc’s regional offices. no Fy 2014 data available.

eligible projects include infrastructure investments that involve the greening of an existing function or process. investments must result in green enhancements to the resource, energy, water, and/or waste, or efficiency of an existing function or process. the enhancements reflect changes to the lifecycle process of an existing function so that the function is performed in a more sustainable manner.

498


depaRtment oF educatIon gRant

toD physical development that includes an educational programming component (e.g., education center tied to transit stop) could qualify a portion of the streetcar project and appurtenances for funding from the Doe.Federal law encourages joint development of facilities that enhance the effectiveness of and are physically or functionally related to public transportation. Such joint development must enhance economic development or incorporate private investment such as commercial and residential development.

although the streetcar line does not fit any currently available Doe funding programs, this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements that correspond to an educational initiative.Such educational service integration at or within proximity of streetcar lines and station stops could also enhance scoring for other federal grant programs that are more immediately applicable to streetcar and thus help leverage additional funds.

Undetermined. capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated education services

depaRtment oF health and human seRVIces and depaRtment oF tRanspoRtatIon FundIng

toD physical development that includes a social service programming component (e.g., Sam rogers outpost center tied to transit stop) could qualify a portion of the streetcar project and appurtenances for funding from the HHS.

Federal law encourages joint development of facilities that enhance the effectiveness of and are physically or functionally related to public transportation. Such joint development must enhance economic development or incorporate private investment such as commercial and residential development.

although the streetcar line does not fit any currently available HHS funding programs, this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements that correspond to an educational initiative. Such social service integration at or within proximity of streetcar lines and station stops could also enhance scoring for other federal grant programs that are more immediately applicable to streetcar and thus help leverage additional funds.

HHS programming also complementary of Dot/Fta statutory authority and policy of encouraging the integration of child and elder care centers within transit facilities.

Undetermined. capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated social services.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

499


depaRtment oF educatIon gRant

toD physical development that includes an educational programming component (e.g., education center tied to transit stop) could qualify a portion of the streetcar project and appurtenances for funding from the Doe.Federal law encourages joint development of facilities that enhance the effectiveness of and are physically or functionally related to public transportation. Such joint development must enhance economic development or incorporate private investment such as commercial and residential development.

although the streetcar line does not fit any currently available Doe funding programs, this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements that correspond to an educational initiative.Such educational service integration at or within proximity of streetcar lines and station stops could also enhance scoring for other federal grant programs that are more immediately applicable to streetcar and thus help leverage additional funds.

Undetermined. capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated education services

depaRtment oF health and human seRVIces and depaRtment oF tRanspoRtatIon FundIng

toD physical development that includes a social service programming component (e.g., Sam rogers outpost center tied to transit stop) could qualify a portion of the streetcar project and appurtenances for funding from the HHS.


although the streetcar line does not fit any currently available HHS funding programs, this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements that correspond to an educational initiative. Such social service integration at or within proximity of streetcar lines and station stops could also enhance scoring for other federal grant programs that are more immediately applicable to streetcar and thus help leverage additional funds.

HHS programming also complementary of Dot/Fta statutory authority and policy of encouraging the integration of child and elder care centers within transit facilities.

Undetermined. capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated social services.

500


depaRtment oF justIce gRants

toD physical development that includes a crime prevention social service component (e.g., security center tied to transit stop) could qualify a portion of the streetcar project and appurtenances for funding from the Doj. in addition, Doj periodically provides funding for physical security improvements in at-risk neighborhoods, as part of a greater crime prevention or safety integration initiative. Such improvements have included, for example, security and lighting at locations tied to community policing activities and safety centers.


although the streetcar line does not fit any currently available Doj funding programs (excepting, potentially promise zones cited above), this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements that correspond to criminal justice, community policing activities, and safety centers. Such security and criminal justice activity integration at or within proximity of streetcar lines and station stops could also enhance scoring for other federal grant programs that are more immediately applicable to streetcar and thus help leverage additional funds.

although no currently available Doj funding programs appear to be applicable to the streetcar project, this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements and leverage additional funds.

Undetermined. capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated crime prevention services or safety integration initiatives.

eneRgY eFFIcIencY and conseRVatIon block gRant pRogRam

arra program that provides financial assistance to local governments to create and implement a variety of energy efficiency and conservation projects. the program’s objectives are (1) to reduce fossil fuel emissions created as a result of activities within the jurisdictions of eligible entities; (2) reduce the total energy use of the eligible entities; and (3) improve energy efficiency in the transportation, building, and other sectors.

Statutory formulas are not applicable to this program.

there is no local match requirement, however leveraging of funds on the part of the recipient is encouraged.

no Fy 2014 estimate is available.

capital costs of catenary and station stops and related station improvements; marketing. (e.g. developing public education programs to increase participation and efficiency rates for recycling programs.)

RaIl and tRansIt secuRItY gRant pRogRam

arra program designed to create sustainable programs for the protection of critical transportation infrastructure from terrorism, with special emphasis on construction projects that address the most significant risks and can also be completed in a timely fashion.

eligible applicant must be local transit agency that has undergone a security assessment conducted by the Department of Homeland Security. priority will be given to operational packages and capital projects that address the most significant risks and can also be completed in a timely fashion.

this program has no statutory formula.this program has no matching requirements. program was not funded in Fy 2014.

planning and physical improvements related to operations.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

501


depaRtment oF justIce gRants

toD physical development that includes a crime prevention social service component (e.g., security center tied to transit stop) could qualify a portion of the streetcar project and appurtenances for funding from the Doj. in addition, Doj periodically provides funding for physical security improvements in at-risk neighborhoods, as part of a greater crime prevention or safety integration initiative. Such improvements have included, for example, security and lighting at locations tied to community policing activities and safety centers.


although the streetcar line does not fit any currently available Doj funding programs (excepting, potentially promise zones cited above), this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements that correspond to criminal justice, community policing activities, and safety centers. Such security and criminal justice activity integration at or within proximity of streetcar lines and station stops could also enhance scoring for other federal grant programs that are more immediately applicable to streetcar and thus help leverage additional funds.

although no currently available Doj funding programs appear to be applicable to the streetcar project, this resource is notated for future reference as it might relate to station stop improvements and leverage additional funds.

Undetermined. capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated crime prevention services or safety integration initiatives.

eneRgY eFFIcIencY and conseRVatIon block gRant pRogRam

arra program that provides financial assistance to local governments to create and implement a variety of energy efficiency and conservation projects. the program’s objectives are (1) to reduce fossil fuel emissions created as a result of activities within the jurisdictions of eligible entities; (2) reduce the total energy use of the eligible entities; and (3) improve energy efficiency in the transportation, building, and other sectors.


there is no local match requirement, however leveraging of funds on the part of the recipient is encouraged.


capital costs of catenary and station stops and related station improvements; marketing. (e.g. developing public education programs to increase participation and efficiency rates for recycling programs.)

RaIl and tRansIt secuRItY gRant pRogRam

arra program designed to create sustainable programs for the protection of critical transportation infrastructure from terrorism, with special emphasis on construction projects that address the most significant risks and can also be completed in a timely fashion.

eligible applicant must be local transit agency that has undergone a security assessment conducted by the Department of Homeland Security. priority will be given to operational packages and capital projects that address the most significant risks and can also be completed in a timely fashion.

this program has no statutory formula.this program has no matching requirements. program was not funded in Fy 2014.

planning and physical improvements related to operations.

502


FedeRal loan guaRantees FoR InnoVatIVe eneRgY technologIes

arra guarantee program available to a private entity or public institution to encourage, through the use of Federal loan guarantees, early commercial use in the United States of new or significantly improved technologies in energy projects that; 1) avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants or anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases; and (2) employ new or significantly improved technologies as compared to commercial technologies in service in the United States at the time the guarantee is issued.



Might be utilized for capital projects that include efficient end-use energy technologies.

gRant antIcIpatIon notes (gans)

Lending tool that may be used by transit agencies to borrow against future Federal-aid funds (Federal transit administration title 49 grants) that are allocated by formula.

two-thirds of Federal-transit funding is apportioned by formula funds, while one-third is allocated on a discretionary basis by congress and the Fta. Funds are distributed by a formula based on population and transit characteristics.

Funds may be used for purchase of trains.

InnoVatIVe tRansIt woRkFoRce deVelopment pRogRam

Funding of proposals that promote diverse and innovative workforce development models and programs and leverage investments in public transportation infrastructure to generate positive impacts in local employment, particularly in underserved communities. program could be utilized to leverage funds from other city supported job training programming.

Grants range from $500,000 to $1 million. cost sharing is not required, but leveraged resources are strongly encouraged and may affect an applicant’s final score.

potential use for capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated workforce development services (e.g. a LiSc financial opportunity center located at or along transit stop)

epa pollutIon pReVentIon and InnoVatIon gRant/ clean aIR act

Grants to conduct, and promote the coordination and acceleration of research, investigations, experiments, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes, effects (including health and welfare effects), extent, prevention, and control of air pollution.

note: Because they are powered by electricity, trolleys are much quieter and cleaner than gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles. For that reason, clear air act funding is a component of St. Louis trolley Loop.

act authorizes the federal government to provide grants equaling up to 60 percent of the cost of state and local programs, while state and local agencies must provide a 40-percent match. in practice, the federal share represents approximately 25 percent of total state/local air budgets, while state and local governments provide 75 percent.

Undetermined.

Fta new FReedom pRogRam 5317

the purpose of this grant program is to provide additional tools to overcome existing barriers facing americans with disabilities seeking integration into the work force and full participation in society. the new Freedom formula grant program seeks to reduce barriers to transportation services and expand the transportation mobility options available to people with disabilities beyond the requirements of the americans with Disabilities act (aDa) of 1990.

Section 5317 funds are apportioned among the recipients by a formula that is based upon the ratio that the number of individuals with disabilities in each such area bears to the number of individuals with disabilities in all such areas.

Federal share of eligible capital and planning costs may not exceed 80% of the net cost of the activity. the Federal share of the eligible operating costs may not exceed 50% of the net operating costs of the activity. recipients may use up to 10 percent of their apportionment to support program administrative costs including administration, planning, and technical assistance, which may be funded at 100% Federal share. the local share of eligible capital and planning costs shall be no less than 20% of the net cost of the activity, and the local share for eligible operating costs shall be no less than 50

capital and operating expenses for new public transportation services and new public transportation alternatives beyond those required by the american with Disabilities act of 1990 that are designed to assist individuals with disabilities.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

503


FedeRal loan guaRantees FoR InnoVatIVe eneRgY technologIes

arra guarantee program available to a private entity or public institution to encourage, through the use of Federal loan guarantees, early commercial use in the United States of new or significantly improved technologies in energy projects that; 1) avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants or anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases; and (2) employ new or significantly improved technologies as compared to commercial technologies in service in the United States at the time the guarantee is issued.



Might be utilized for capital projects that include efficient end-use energy technologies.

gRant antIcIpatIon notes (gans)

Lending tool that may be used by transit agencies to borrow against future Federal-aid funds (Federal transit administration title 49 grants) that are allocated by formula.

two-thirds of Federal-transit funding is apportioned by formula funds, while one-third is allocated on a discretionary basis by congress and the Fta. Funds are distributed by a formula based on population and transit characteristics.

Funds may be used for purchase of trains.

InnoVatIVe tRansIt woRkFoRce deVelopment pRogRam

Funding of proposals that promote diverse and innovative workforce development models and programs and leverage investments in public transportation infrastructure to generate positive impacts in local employment, particularly in underserved communities. program could be utilized to leverage funds from other city supported job training programming.

Grants range from $500,000 to $1 million. cost sharing is not required, but leveraged resources are strongly encouraged and may affect an applicant’s final score.

potential use for capital construction costs for toD/transit centers with integrated workforce development services (e.g. a LiSc financial opportunity center located at or along transit stop)

epa pollutIon pReVentIon and InnoVatIon gRant/ clean aIR act

Grants to conduct, and promote the coordination and acceleration of research, investigations, experiments, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes, effects (including health and welfare effects), extent, prevention, and control of air pollution.

note: Because they are powered by electricity, trolleys are much quieter and cleaner than gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles. For that reason, clear air act funding is a component of St. Louis trolley Loop.

act authorizes the federal government to provide grants equaling up to 60 percent of the cost of state and local programs, while state and local agencies must provide a 40-percent match. in practice, the federal share represents approximately 25 percent of total state/local air budgets, while state and local governments provide 75 percent.

Undetermined.

Fta new FReedom pRogRam 5317

the purpose of this grant program is to provide additional tools to overcome existing barriers facing americans with disabilities seeking integration into the work force and full participation in society. the new Freedom formula grant program seeks to reduce barriers to transportation services and expand the transportation mobility options available to people with disabilities beyond the requirements of the americans with Disabilities act (aDa) of 1990.

Section 5317 funds are apportioned among the recipients by a formula that is based upon the ratio that the number of individuals with disabilities in each such area bears to the number of individuals with disabilities in all such areas.

Federal share of eligible capital and planning costs may not exceed 80% of the net cost of the activity. the Federal share of the eligible operating costs may not exceed 50% of the net operating costs of the activity. recipients may use up to 10 percent of their apportionment to support program administrative costs including administration, planning, and technical assistance, which may be funded at 100% Federal share. the local share of eligible capital and planning costs shall be no less than 20% of the net cost of the activity, and the local share for eligible operating costs shall be no less than 50

capital and operating expenses for new public transportation services and new public transportation alternatives beyond those required by the american with Disabilities act of 1990 that are designed to assist individuals with disabilities.

504


publIc d.o.t. publIc lands hIghwaYs dIscRetIonaRY Funds

provides funding for the construction of any kind of transportation project eligible for assistance under title 23, that is within, adjacent to or provides access to Federal public lands, including national parks, refuges, forests, recreation areas, and grasslands. title 23 projects include capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, including vehicles and facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, that are used to provide intercity passenger service by bus.

although the Katy trail is a state-designated trail and not a Federal public land, the portion of the trail between St. charles and Booneville is designated as an official segment of the Lewis and clark national Historic trail by the U.S. national park Service, and the entire trail is part of the american Discovery trail. thus, transit facilities constructed in Linwood Boulevard, an area that is arguably adjacent to and provides access to the Lewis and clark national Historic trail, via the Katy trail, might qualify under this program.

Federal share of the costs for any project eligible under this program is 100 percent.

May be used for the State/local matching share for apportioned Federal-aid Highway Funds, as described in 23 USc 120(l).

pLHD funds can be used for any type of title 23 transportation project providing access to or within Federal lands.

lands or facilities. Under the provisions of 23 U.S.c. 204(b)(1)(a), the pLH funds are available for the construction of transit facilities.

Fha tRanspoRtatIon alteRnatIVes Funds

projects defined as “transportation alternatives,” which include infrastructure projects designed to improve non-driver access to public transportation, enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; safe routes to school projects.

$820M authorization for Fy 2014. Section 213 of title 23 provides for the reservation of funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b) of title 23 to carry out the tap. 80 percent Federal/20 percent State or local match.

capital infrastructure related to ccorW (construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the americans with Disabilities act of 1990 (42 USc 12101 et seq.; funds may also be used for the conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non-motorized transportation users).

saFetea-lu tRanspoRtatIon, communItY & sYstem pReseRVatIon

Mpo, State and local governments are eligible for discretionary grants to implement strategies which improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce environmental impacts of transportation, reduce the need for costly future public infrastructure investments, ensure efficient access to jobs, services and centers of trade, and examine development patterns and identify strategies to encourage private sector development patterns which achieve these goals.

$29 million funded in 2012. information not available regarding funding levels for Fy 2014.

planning grant for future phase development.

tRansIt InVestment In gReenhouse gas and eneRgY ReductIon (tIggeR)

capital investments that will reduce the energy consumption or greenhouse gas emissions of a public transportation agency. Since inception, a total of 10 projects are investigating efficient rail technologies such as wayside energy storage, locomotive upgrades, and control systems for track heaters. tiGGer program focuses on the total energy savings, and/or emissions reductions of a project over its expected its useful life.

$49.9 million awarded through Fy 2011. information regarding potential Fy 2014 unavailable.

operational or technological enhancements or innovations.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

505


publIc d.o.t. publIc lands hIghwaYs dIscRetIonaRY Funds

provides funding for the construction of any kind of transportation project eligible for assistance under title 23, that is within, adjacent to or provides access to Federal public lands, including national parks, refuges, forests, recreation areas, and grasslands. title 23 projects include capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, including vehicles and facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, that are used to provide intercity passenger service by bus.

although the Katy trail is a state-designated trail and not a Federal public land, the portion of the trail between St. charles and Booneville is designated as an official segment of the Lewis and clark national Historic trail by the U.S. national park Service, and the entire trail is part of the american Discovery trail. thus, transit facilities constructed in Linwood Boulevard, an area that is arguably adjacent to and provides access to the Lewis and clark national Historic trail, via the Katy trail, might qualify under this program.

Federal share of the costs for any project eligible under this program is 100 percent.

May be used for the State/local matching share for apportioned Federal-aid Highway Funds, as described in 23 USc 120(l).

pLHD funds can be used for any type of title 23 transportation project providing access to or within Federal lands.

lands or facilities. Under the provisions of 23 U.S.c. 204(b)(1)(a), the pLH funds are available for the construction of transit facilities.

Fha tRanspoRtatIon alteRnatIVes Funds

projects defined as “transportation alternatives,” which include infrastructure projects designed to improve non-driver access to public transportation, enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; safe routes to school projects.

$820M authorization for Fy 2014. Section 213 of title 23 provides for the reservation of funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b) of title 23 to carry out the tap. 80 percent Federal/20 percent State or local match.

capital infrastructure related to ccorW (construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the americans with Disabilities act of 1990 (42 USc 12101 et seq.; funds may also be used for the conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non-motorized transportation users).

saFetea-lu tRanspoRtatIon, communItY & sYstem pReseRVatIon

Mpo, State and local governments are eligible for discretionary grants to implement strategies which improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce environmental impacts of transportation, reduce the need for costly future public infrastructure investments, ensure efficient access to jobs, services and centers of trade, and examine development patterns and identify strategies to encourage private sector development patterns which achieve these goals.

$29 million funded in 2012. information not available regarding funding levels for Fy 2014.

planning grant for future phase development.

tRansIt InVestment In gReenhouse gas and eneRgY ReductIon (tIggeR)

capital investments that will reduce the energy consumption or greenhouse gas emissions of a public transportation agency. Since inception, a total of 10 projects are investigating efficient rail technologies such as wayside energy storage, locomotive upgrades, and control systems for track heaters. tiGGer program focuses on the total energy savings, and/or emissions reductions of a project over its expected its useful life.

$49.9 million awarded through Fy 2011. information regarding potential Fy 2014 unavailable.

operational or technological enhancements or innovations.

506


Fta job access and ReVeRse commute gRants 5316

capital, planning and operating expenses for projects that transport low-income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to employment, and for reverse commute projects. States and public bodies are eligible designated recipients.

Section 5316 funds are apportioned among the recipients by a formula that is based upon the ratio that the number of eligible low-income and welfare recipients in each such area bears to the number of eligible low-income and welfare recipients in all such areas.

Federal share of eligible capital and planning costs may not exceed 80% of the net cost of the activity. the Federal share of the eligible operating costs may not exceed 50% of the net operating costs of the activity. recipients may use up to 10% of their apportionment to support program administrative costs including administration, planning, and technical assistance, which may be funded at100% Federal share. the local share of eligible capital and planning costs shall be no less than 20% of the net cost of the activity, and the local share for eligible operating costs shall be no less than 50% of the net operating costs.

Flexible.

Fta VeteRans tRanspoRtatIon and communItY lIVIng InItIatIVe gRant pRogRam

transportation access programs for veterans, active service members, military families, and others to learn about and arrange for locally available transportation services that connect them with work, education, health care, and other vital services in their communities.

$29 M annually. Marc received $50,000 in 2012 and $161,000 in 2011. other states, when coordinated with broader Veteran activities, received allocations in excess of $1.2M.

Marketing; transmit related communications and technology

Fta tRanspoRtatIon FoR eldeRlY peRsons and peRsons wIth dIsabIlItIes (49 u.s.c. sectIon 5310)

capital expenses that support transportation to meet the special needs of older adults and persons with disabilities.

Section 5310 funds are apportioned among the States by a formula which is based on the number of elderly persons and persons with disabilities in each State according to the latest available U.S. census data.

the Federal share of eligible capital costs may not exceed 80% of the net cost of the activity. the 10% that is eligible to fund program administrative costs including administration, planning, and technical assistance may be funded at 100% Federal share. the local share of eligible capital costs shall be no less than 20% of the net cost of the activity.


ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

507


Fta job access and ReVeRse commute gRants 5316

capital, planning and operating expenses for projects that transport low-income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to employment, and for reverse commute projects. States and public bodies are eligible designated recipients.

Section 5316 funds are apportioned among the recipients by a formula that is based upon the ratio that the number of eligible low-income and welfare recipients in each such area bears to the number of eligible low-income and welfare recipients in all such areas.

Federal share of eligible capital and planning costs may not exceed 80% of the net cost of the activity. the Federal share of the eligible operating costs may not exceed 50% of the net operating costs of the activity. recipients may use up to 10% of their apportionment to support program administrative costs including administration, planning, and technical assistance, which may be funded at100% Federal share. the local share of eligible capital and planning costs shall be no less than 20% of the net cost of the activity, and the local share for eligible operating costs shall be no less than 50% of the net operating costs.

Flexible.

Fta VeteRans tRanspoRtatIon and communItY lIVIng InItIatIVe gRant pRogRam

transportation access programs for veterans, active service members, military families, and others to learn about and arrange for locally available transportation services that connect them with work, education, health care, and other vital services in their communities.

$29 M annually. Marc received $50,000 in 2012 and $161,000 in 2011. other states, when coordinated with broader Veteran activities, received allocations in excess of $1.2M.

Marketing; transmit related communications and technology

Fta tRanspoRtatIon FoR eldeRlY peRsons and peRsons wIth dIsabIlItIes (49 u.s.c. sectIon 5310)

capital expenses that support transportation to meet the special needs of older adults and persons with disabilities.

Section 5310 funds are apportioned among the States by a formula which is based on the number of elderly persons and persons with disabilities in each State according to the latest available U.S. census data.

the Federal share of eligible capital costs may not exceed 80% of the net cost of the activity. the 10% that is eligible to fund program administrative costs including administration, planning, and technical assistance may be funded at 100% Federal share. the local share of eligible capital costs shall be no less than 20% of the net cost of the activity.


508


lIVable cItIes demonstRatIon account

LcDa funds innovative development projects that efficiently link housing, jobs, services, and transit in an effort to create inspiring and lasting Livable communities. Grants are available to fund basic public infrastructure and site assembly. projects must connect housing, jobs, civic sites, retail centers and local/regional transportation systems and demonstrate efficient uses land and infrastructure.

infrastructure may include local public streets (including new streets, street realignment; reconstruction of an existing street grid); street extensions or connections; street lighting and street signs; permanent pedestrian features (including sidewalks, and benches); public-use or shared-use parking structures; public connecting elements (generally in the public right-of-way or clearly for public use, including sidewalks and trails that enhance the functional connectivity of the project to transit and other surrounding public spaces including schools and parks); and publically-accessible, site-integrated transit shelters.

196 LcDa grants (totaling > $98 million) have been funded projects in 57 cities.


dot-hud-epa paRtneRshIp FoR sustaInable communItIes (stp)

in 2009, Dot, HUD, and epa announced a joint “partnership for Sustainable communities”. the three agencies made a commitment to work together to advance livable communities and sustainable development.

Dot programs must encourage transportation policies that focus on people and communities who use the transportation system. Likewise, HUD programs must be consistent with HUD’s Strategic Goals and policy priorities, including, e.g.: creating better transportation access to jobs and economic opportunities and leveraging federal and private resources; decreasing household transportation costs; and providing access to jobs or job training and transportation. Funds may be used for public transportation capital improvements and operations.

Subject to Mpo. Flexible.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

509


lIVable cItIes demonstRatIon account

LcDa funds innovative development projects that efficiently link housing, jobs, services, and transit in an effort to create inspiring and lasting Livable communities. Grants are available to fund basic public infrastructure and site assembly. projects must connect housing, jobs, civic sites, retail centers and local/regional transportation systems and demonstrate efficient uses land and infrastructure.

infrastructure may include local public streets (including new streets, street realignment; reconstruction of an existing street grid); street extensions or connections; street lighting and street signs; permanent pedestrian features (including sidewalks, and benches); public-use or shared-use parking structures; public connecting elements (generally in the public right-of-way or clearly for public use, including sidewalks and trails that enhance the functional connectivity of the project to transit and other surrounding public spaces including schools and parks); and publically-accessible, site-integrated transit shelters.

196 LcDa grants (totaling > $98 million) have been funded projects in 57 cities.


dot-hud-epa paRtneRshIp FoR sustaInable communItIes (stp)

in 2009, Dot, HUD, and epa announced a joint “partnership for Sustainable communities”. the three agencies made a commitment to work together to advance livable communities and sustainable development.

Dot programs must encourage transportation policies that focus on people and communities who use the transportation system. Likewise, HUD programs must be consistent with HUD’s Strategic Goals and policy priorities, including, e.g.: creating better transportation access to jobs and economic opportunities and leveraging federal and private resources; decreasing household transportation costs; and providing access to jobs or job training and transportation. Funds may be used for public transportation capital improvements and operations.

Subject to Mpo. Flexible.

510

statesouRce pRogRam descRIptIon oR concept FundIng InFoRmatIon applIcabIlItY

annual appRopRIatIon FoR amtRak

State of Missouri, through the Missouri Department of transportation, provides funds to amtrak to operate on a line that spans from Kansas city to St. Louis. program enjoys bi-partisan support from urban and rural factions alike, and there have been recent efforts by Kansas city to tie Kansas city amtrak to San antonio and oklahoma city via newton and Wichita, Kansas.

coupling the streetcar project to state amtrak funding and jackson county’s commuter rail initiative might create statewide political support to increase Missouri’s appropriation, a portion of which could then be leveraged to the streetcar project.

State historically funds amtrak service in the amount of approximately $8.5 million per annum. For Fy 2014, that number is $8.9 million.

operations.

geneRal appRopRIatIon

a limited-term, annual appropriation pledge for the streetcar project is a moral obligation of the State. Mostly general revenue funds are used for transit, as the Missouri constitution prohibits state gas tax money from being used for anything other than roads.

note: the Seattle Streetcar was able to secure $3 million in state budget appropriation for its streetcar project.

Subject to appropriation. Flexible.

mIssouRI state tRanspoRtatIon Fund

the State of Missouri spent a total of $6.9 million in Fy 2009 for transit projects utilizing the Missouri State transportation Fund. Seven public urban transit providers and 27 rural transit providers receive state transit operating assistance funds.

the State transportation Fund may also provide monies for trails, paths, and bikeways that occupy a transportation facility right-of-way, without limitation to any specific location within that right-of-way, so long as the continuity of the trail, path, bikeway, or sidewalk is maintained. Furthermore, the fund will support trails, paths, and bikeways that are part of the local transportation system and which function primarily for transportation.

the State transportation Fund will also sponsor enhancement projects and mitigation activities. proposed legislation (Sjr 48) for one-cent sales tax for transit is pending.


state supplemental tIF

When local tiF leaves a gap for a redevelopment project, a municipality can apply for a portion of the new state tax revenues created by the project to be disbursed to cover the financing gap for eligible redevelopment costs on the project. to be eligible for State tiF, the underlying local tiF must dedicate at least 50% of the amount of the new local sales tax revenue and 100% of the amount of the new real property tax revenue created by the project each year for which state tiF is sought.

an applicant may be approved to receive up to 50% of the net new state sales tax revenue (general revenue portion only; excluding dedicated taxes) generated in the project area or up to 50% of the increase in state income tax revenue from net new jobs in the project area. an applicant cannot receive both. State tiF may be awarded for a period of up to 15 years (a longer period may be requested, but not to exceed 23 years). the tiF project funds may be derived from a bond issue (retired with the local and state incremental revenues), or a reimbursement to the developer for eligible costs. a redevelopment project cannot receive more than half of the increased amount of state sales tax or income tax it generates.

capital infrastructure in any local tiF project area located in a state enterprise zone, a federal empowerment zone, an urban core area, or central business district. the redevelopment project must be in a redevelopment project area that, over the past 20 years, has experienced a generally declining population or generally declining property taxes.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

511

statesouRce pRogRam descRIptIon oR concept FundIng InFoRmatIon applIcabIlItY

annual appRopRIatIon FoR amtRak

State of Missouri, through the Missouri Department of transportation, provides funds to amtrak to operate on a line that spans from Kansas city to St. Louis. program enjoys bi-partisan support from urban and rural factions alike, and there have been recent efforts by Kansas city to tie Kansas city amtrak to San antonio and oklahoma city via newton and Wichita, Kansas.

coupling the streetcar project to state amtrak funding and jackson county’s commuter rail initiative might create statewide political support to increase Missouri’s appropriation, a portion of which could then be leveraged to the streetcar project.

State historically funds amtrak service in the amount of approximately $8.5 million per annum. For Fy 2014, that number is $8.9 million.

operations.

geneRal appRopRIatIon

a limited-term, annual appropriation pledge for the streetcar project is a moral obligation of the State. Mostly general revenue funds are used for transit, as the Missouri constitution prohibits state gas tax money from being used for anything other than roads.

note: the Seattle Streetcar was able to secure $3 million in state budget appropriation for its streetcar project.


mIssouRI state tRanspoRtatIon Fund

the State of Missouri spent a total of $6.9 million in Fy 2009 for transit projects utilizing the Missouri State transportation Fund. Seven public urban transit providers and 27 rural transit providers receive state transit operating assistance funds.

the State transportation Fund may also provide monies for trails, paths, and bikeways that occupy a transportation facility right-of-way, without limitation to any specific location within that right-of-way, so long as the continuity of the trail, path, bikeway, or sidewalk is maintained. Furthermore, the fund will support trails, paths, and bikeways that are part of the local transportation system and which function primarily for transportation.

the State transportation Fund will also sponsor enhancement projects and mitigation activities. proposed legislation (Sjr 48) for one-cent sales tax for transit is pending.


state supplemental tIF

When local tiF leaves a gap for a redevelopment project, a municipality can apply for a portion of the new state tax revenues created by the project to be disbursed to cover the financing gap for eligible redevelopment costs on the project. to be eligible for State tiF, the underlying local tiF must dedicate at least 50% of the amount of the new local sales tax revenue and 100% of the amount of the new real property tax revenue created by the project each year for which state tiF is sought.

an applicant may be approved to receive up to 50% of the net new state sales tax revenue (general revenue portion only; excluding dedicated taxes) generated in the project area or up to 50% of the increase in state income tax revenue from net new jobs in the project area. an applicant cannot receive both. State tiF may be awarded for a period of up to 15 years (a longer period may be requested, but not to exceed 23 years). the tiF project funds may be derived from a bond issue (retired with the local and state incremental revenues), or a reimbursement to the developer for eligible costs. a redevelopment project cannot receive more than half of the increased amount of state sales tax or income tax it generates.

capital infrastructure in any local tiF project area located in a state enterprise zone, a federal empowerment zone, an urban core area, or central business district. the redevelopment project must be in a redevelopment project area that, over the past 20 years, has experienced a generally declining population or generally declining property taxes.

512


mIssouRI deVelopment FInance boaRd contRIbutIon tax cRedIts

a taxpayer making a donation to MDFB receives a tax credit equal to 50% of any moneys contributed. application for tax credit is made to MDFB by the public entity. Following deduction of its fees, MDFB distributes the contribution to the public entity for purposes of implementing the project. Donor, by agreement, may sell the tax credits and donate the sales proceeds to the project, whereby allowing a $10 million project to be a $15 million. public, tax-exempt bond proceeds may be used to fund contribution, through a properly structured agreement with foundation.

in 2013, maximum contribution was $10 million. an additional $15 million allocation is possible.

capital “infrastructure facilities,” including public facilities and any other improvements provided by any form of government.

tRanspoRtatIon coRpoRatIon

Missouri is one of three states in the nation to have transportation corporation (tc) statutes. a tc is a not for profit, non-stock privately owned corporation that may develop transportation projects. the project must be a necessary or desirable extension or improvement of the state transportation system, therefor a nexus between it and the streetcar project would be required.

tc’s have the authority to promote and develop public transportation facilities and systems and thereby promoting economic development in the state.

a corporation may use any number of funding methods authorized under state law. it may issue bonds, notes and other obligations, and may secure these obligations by mortgage, pledge, or deed of trust of any or all of the property and income of the corporation, subject to state restrictions. they may establish and impose fees for services provided. they may also contract to provide project revenues to MHtc which would apply those revenues to project costs, including debt service on revenue bonds or refunding bonds.

a tc may be formed by three registered voters of the State.

Undetermined. project and budget subject to Missouri Highways transportation approval.

Flexible.

tax-exempt ceRtIFIcates oF paRtIcIpatIon

cops are tax-exempt bonds issued by state entities usually secured with revenue from an equipment or facility lease. cops enable governmental entities to finance capital projects without technically issuing long-term debt. cops have been used by municipalities to pay for prisons, office buildings, vehicles, and even parks.

a purpose-formed state entity issues tax-exempt bonds with maturities that match the lease term of assets that are purchased by the state entity with the proceeds from the bond issue. in the case of transit assets, the state entity then leases the equipment to one or more transit agencies. the underlying lease or installation sale agreement furnishes the revenue stream necessary to secure the bond. the resulting lease payments, most often made with a combination of formula grant funds and local matching share, are then “passed through” to the bondholders by the state entity.

Flexible; undetermined. capital infrastructure such as rolling stock, depots, and automated toll collection equipment, all of which are well suited to lease agreements.

could be coupled with a p3 transaction.

sale oF state land publicly owned lands near streetcar lines may be considered as opportunities to raise funds for the system. the surplus lands can be sold or, alternatively, unused development capacity of publicly owned property can be negotiated for development by the private sector.

Flexible; undetermined. Flexible.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

513


mIssouRI deVelopment FInance boaRd contRIbutIon tax cRedIts

a taxpayer making a donation to MDFB receives a tax credit equal to 50% of any moneys contributed. application for tax credit is made to MDFB by the public entity. Following deduction of its fees, MDFB distributes the contribution to the public entity for purposes of implementing the project. Donor, by agreement, may sell the tax credits and donate the sales proceeds to the project, whereby allowing a $10 million project to be a $15 million. public, tax-exempt bond proceeds may be used to fund contribution, through a properly structured agreement with foundation.

in 2013, maximum contribution was $10 million. an additional $15 million allocation is possible.

capital “infrastructure facilities,” including public facilities and any other improvements provided by any form of government.

tRanspoRtatIon coRpoRatIon

Missouri is one of three states in the nation to have transportation corporation (tc) statutes. a tc is a not for profit, non-stock privately owned corporation that may develop transportation projects. the project must be a necessary or desirable extension or improvement of the state transportation system, therefor a nexus between it and the streetcar project would be required.

tc’s have the authority to promote and develop public transportation facilities and systems and thereby promoting economic development in the state.

a corporation may use any number of funding methods authorized under state law. it may issue bonds, notes and other obligations, and may secure these obligations by mortgage, pledge, or deed of trust of any or all of the property and income of the corporation, subject to state restrictions. they may establish and impose fees for services provided. they may also contract to provide project revenues to MHtc which would apply those revenues to project costs, including debt service on revenue bonds or refunding bonds.

a tc may be formed by three registered voters of the State.

Undetermined. project and budget subject to Missouri Highways transportation approval.

Flexible.

tax-exempt ceRtIFIcates oF paRtIcIpatIon

cops are tax-exempt bonds issued by state entities usually secured with revenue from an equipment or facility lease. cops enable governmental entities to finance capital projects without technically issuing long-term debt. cops have been used by municipalities to pay for prisons, office buildings, vehicles, and even parks.

a purpose-formed state entity issues tax-exempt bonds with maturities that match the lease term of assets that are purchased by the state entity with the proceeds from the bond issue. in the case of transit assets, the state entity then leases the equipment to one or more transit agencies. the underlying lease or installation sale agreement furnishes the revenue stream necessary to secure the bond. the resulting lease payments, most often made with a combination of formula grant funds and local matching share, are then “passed through” to the bondholders by the state entity.

Flexible; undetermined. capital infrastructure such as rolling stock, depots, and automated toll collection equipment, all of which are well suited to lease agreements.

could be coupled with a p3 transaction.

sale oF state land publicly owned lands near streetcar lines may be considered as opportunities to raise funds for the system. the surplus lands can be sold or, alternatively, unused development capacity of publicly owned property can be negotiated for development by the private sector.


514


FoReIgn tRade zone Foreign-trade zones for vendor duty savings related to importation of foreign materials and equipment utilized for streetcar line (such as for manufacturers of cars and catenary).

Under U.S. customs and Border protection (cBp) supervision, the usual formal cBp entry procedures and payments of duties are not required on the foreign merchandise unless and until it enters cBp territory for domestic consumption, at which point the importer generally has the choice of paying duties at the rate of either the original foreign materials or the finished product. Domestic goods moved into the zone for export may be considered exported upon admission to the zone for purposes of excise tax rebates and drawback. While in the zone, certain tangible personal property is generally exempt from state and local ad valorem taxes.

Flexible; undetermined. Shared capital savings related to the manufacture of rolling stock, track systems, and catenary.


tRanspoRtatIon tax cRedIt

the State of Missouri previously enjoyed a transportation tax credit (now expired) that was created for a St. Louis-based transportation project. Similar to the MDeD contribution tax credit, the ttc provided a $10 m per year, 50% tax credit for a private, income taxable investor. Legislative success in reviving a proven transportation tool could produce funds for the streetcar project. tax-exempt bond proceeds could potentially be utilized for the contribution, and the sale of the tax credits, pursuant to captive agreement, could then redirect the proceeds from the tax credit sale into project for an additional capital infusion.


motoR VehIcle excIse tax

as permitted by law, the State of Missouri could propose an increase in the Motor Vehicle excise tax (MVet) to help fund the streetcar.

note: Washington State employed this approach for the Seattle monorail, taxing at a rate of 1.4% of a vehicle’s estimated value. all or a portion of the tax would be paid to Kansas city yearly, as city residents registered their cars. Based upon historic trends, projects revenues from an MVet could provide security for financing debt service and for ongoing maintenance.

Undetermined. operations.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

515


FoReIgn tRade zone Foreign-trade zones for vendor duty savings related to importation of foreign materials and equipment utilized for streetcar line (such as for manufacturers of cars and catenary).

Under U.S. customs and Border protection (cBp) supervision, the usual formal cBp entry procedures and payments of duties are not required on the foreign merchandise unless and until it enters cBp territory for domestic consumption, at which point the importer generally has the choice of paying duties at the rate of either the original foreign materials or the finished product. Domestic goods moved into the zone for export may be considered exported upon admission to the zone for purposes of excise tax rebates and drawback. While in the zone, certain tangible personal property is generally exempt from state and local ad valorem taxes.

Flexible; undetermined. Shared capital savings related to the manufacture of rolling stock, track systems, and catenary.


tRanspoRtatIon tax cRedIt

the State of Missouri previously enjoyed a transportation tax credit (now expired) that was created for a St. Louis-based transportation project. Similar to the MDeD contribution tax credit, the ttc provided a $10 m per year, 50% tax credit for a private, income taxable investor. Legislative success in reviving a proven transportation tool could produce funds for the streetcar project. tax-exempt bond proceeds could potentially be utilized for the contribution, and the sale of the tax credits, pursuant to captive agreement, could then redirect the proceeds from the tax credit sale into project for an additional capital infusion.


motoR VehIcle excIse tax

as permitted by law, the State of Missouri could propose an increase in the Motor Vehicle excise tax (MVet) to help fund the streetcar.

note: Washington State employed this approach for the Seattle monorail, taxing at a rate of 1.4% of a vehicle’s estimated value. all or a portion of the tax would be paid to Kansas city yearly, as city residents registered their cars. Based upon historic trends, projects revenues from an MVet could provide security for financing debt service and for ongoing maintenance.


516

pRIVate


homeland secuRItY eb5 pRogRam

US citizenship and immigration Services administers the immigrant investor program, also known as “eB-5,” created by congress in 1990 to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors by setting aside certain eB-5 visas for investors in projects or “regional centers” designated by USciS as promoting economic growth.all eB-5 investors must invest in a new commercial enterprise engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business.

the investment must create or preserve at least 10 direct or indirect full-time jobs for qualifying U.S. workers within two years (or under certain circumstances, within a reasonable time after the two-year period) of the immigrant investor’s admission to the United States. job preservation is only recognized for defined “troubled businesses.”

capital investment is defined as cash, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, cash equivalents and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the alien entrepreneur, provided that the alien entrepreneur is personally and primarily liable and that the assets of the new commercial enterprise upon which the petition is based are not used to secure any of the indebtedness. the minimum qualifying investment is $1 million. could couple eB5 investment with p3.

Many municipalities and developers are investigating the use of eB5 foreign investments for large-scale infrastructure projects.

Flexible and undetermined. Flexible.

publIc-pRIVate paRtneRshIps (p3s)

a p3 transaction to attract private investment to the development of transportation improvements. early involvement of the private sector can bring creativity, efficiency, and capital to address complex transportation problems facing State and local governments.

the Sep-15 program, private activity bonds, and the tiFia Federal credit program are often used to facilitate p3 projects. (the Sep-15 is a new experimental process for FHWa to identify, for trial evaluation, new public-private partnership approaches to project delivery. it is anticipated that these new approaches will allow the efficient delivery of transportation projects without impairing FHWa’s ability to carry out its stewardship responsibilities to protect both the environment and american taxpayers).

possible to use initial p3 investment to front-end local match. possible additional funding investment for streetcar if city shares in returns from a p3 structure that involves an investment in a real estate investment trust (reit). the city owns the investment during the term of the p3.

p3 transactions have funded the streetcar initiatives of San Diego, Los angeles, Las Vegas, and for Maryland’s purple Line.

Determined by agreement. negotiated applicability.

utIlItY taRIFF adjustment

city has approximately 1,400 different rate structures and 1,400 different accounts. petition KcpL to request streetcar tariff rate upon submitting for rate case in the normal course. category.

Determined by agreement. operational savings.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

517

pRIVate


homeland secuRItY eb5 pRogRam

US citizenship and immigration Services administers the immigrant investor program, also known as “eB-5,” created by congress in 1990 to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors by setting aside certain eB-5 visas for investors in projects or “regional centers” designated by USciS as promoting economic growth.all eB-5 investors must invest in a new commercial enterprise engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business.

the investment must create or preserve at least 10 direct or indirect full-time jobs for qualifying U.S. workers within two years (or under certain circumstances, within a reasonable time after the two-year period) of the immigrant investor’s admission to the United States. job preservation is only recognized for defined “troubled businesses.”

capital investment is defined as cash, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, cash equivalents and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the alien entrepreneur, provided that the alien entrepreneur is personally and primarily liable and that the assets of the new commercial enterprise upon which the petition is based are not used to secure any of the indebtedness. the minimum qualifying investment is $1 million. could couple eB5 investment with p3.

Many municipalities and developers are investigating the use of eB5 foreign investments for large-scale infrastructure projects.


publIc-pRIVate paRtneRshIps (p3s)

a p3 transaction to attract private investment to the development of transportation improvements. early involvement of the private sector can bring creativity, efficiency, and capital to address complex transportation problems facing State and local governments.

the Sep-15 program, private activity bonds, and the tiFia Federal credit program are often used to facilitate p3 projects. (the Sep-15 is a new experimental process for FHWa to identify, for trial evaluation, new public-private partnership approaches to project delivery. it is anticipated that these new approaches will allow the efficient delivery of transportation projects without impairing FHWa’s ability to carry out its stewardship responsibilities to protect both the environment and american taxpayers).

possible to use initial p3 investment to front-end local match. possible additional funding investment for streetcar if city shares in returns from a p3 structure that involves an investment in a real estate investment trust (reit). the city owns the investment during the term of the p3.

p3 transactions have funded the streetcar initiatives of San Diego, Los angeles, Las Vegas, and for Maryland’s purple Line.

Determined by agreement. negotiated applicability.

utIlItY taRIFF adjustment

city has approximately 1,400 different rate structures and 1,400 different accounts. petition KcpL to request streetcar tariff rate upon submitting for rate case in the normal course. category.

Determined by agreement. operational savings.

518


utIlItY constRuctIon saVIngs pRogRam

Kansas city power & Light has an urban core economic development rider that provides for a reduced utility rate for five years. the first year the rate is discounted by 25% and then the discount reduces 5% per annum. project must demonstrate it is receiving state or local government financial support.

the streetcar will be large KcpL customer. the streetcar system will use 750-volt dc system through catenary, 7-8 kw hours per mile, 8-9 million mega watt-hours per year, based upon a 10-mile extension. each substation will use roughly 350 kw hours, which is a significant load. (compare: load at Kansas city’s irS complex is estimated at 3-5 MW). the streetcar project will generate +/- 15-20 substations, and substation construction cost is about $1.2 million/$115 +/- per substation. the distance from substation affects costs. there will also be a connection fee to extend the electric utility feed from the KcpL line to the streetcar. Utilities will account for approximately 10-15% of the streetcar operating costs per annum.

there also exist tariffs that discount rates for usage on off-peak times (11-7, Mon- Friday is peak; everything else in non-peak). tariff doesn’t automatically apply; the system will have to meet particular consumption criteria.

if the projected consumption is high enough, KcpL will cover 85% of costs to construct the independent substations.


FoundatIon gRants and phIlanthRopIc suppoRt

Kansas city and surrounding communities are home to many foundations that have generously supported large-scale infrastructure projects and initiatives. Likewise, the proven success of streetcar lines to community connectivity and economic development could attract similar private donations to Kansas city’s philanthropic community. Donations could be recognized through streetcar and stop naming.

Flexible; undetermined. Dependent upon foundation funding criteria, if funds are restricted.

not-FoR-pRoFIt suppoRt - local InItIatIVes suppoRt coRpoRatIon (lIsc)

Funding opportunities may available through not-for-profit community development entities with transportation oriented development initiatives.

LiSc has a foundation that makes $100k, 0% loans to important projects in the community. they can do up to $1.2 million a year, in $100k increments. Such funding opportunities may be available through the Greater Kc LiSc.

additionally, LiSc has invested $222M in transit oriented development projects nationwide, which has leveraged over $1 billion in total development investment along streetcar corridors. examples include, Boston, Los angeles, phoenix, and Minneapolis.

note: LiSc is currently using its funding products in connection with the phoenix streetcar initiative to support redevelopment along its existing rail line with some focus on a new four-mile second phase streetcar extension currently under construction.

Flexible; undetermined. Flexible; primarily collateral development but could include stations and other community , commercial, and residential developments within and along streetcar line.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

519


utIlItY constRuctIon saVIngs pRogRam

Kansas city power & Light has an urban core economic development rider that provides for a reduced utility rate for five years. the first year the rate is discounted by 25% and then the discount reduces 5% per annum. project must demonstrate it is receiving state or local government financial support.

the streetcar will be large KcpL customer. the streetcar system will use 750-volt dc system through catenary, 7-8 kw hours per mile, 8-9 million mega watt-hours per year, based upon a 10-mile extension. each substation will use roughly 350 kw hours, which is a significant load. (compare: load at Kansas city’s irS complex is estimated at 3-5 MW). the streetcar project will generate +/- 15-20 substations, and substation construction cost is about $1.2 million/$115 +/- per substation. the distance from substation affects costs. there will also be a connection fee to extend the electric utility feed from the KcpL line to the streetcar. Utilities will account for approximately 10-15% of the streetcar operating costs per annum.

there also exist tariffs that discount rates for usage on off-peak times (11-7, Mon- Friday is peak; everything else in non-peak). tariff doesn’t automatically apply; the system will have to meet particular consumption criteria.

if the projected consumption is high enough, KcpL will cover 85% of costs to construct the independent substations.


FoundatIon gRants and phIlanthRopIc suppoRt

Kansas city and surrounding communities are home to many foundations that have generously supported large-scale infrastructure projects and initiatives. Likewise, the proven success of streetcar lines to community connectivity and economic development could attract similar private donations to Kansas city’s philanthropic community. Donations could be recognized through streetcar and stop naming.

Flexible; undetermined. Dependent upon foundation funding criteria, if funds are restricted.

not-FoR-pRoFIt suppoRt - local InItIatIVes suppoRt coRpoRatIon (lIsc)

Funding opportunities may available through not-for-profit community development entities with transportation oriented development initiatives.

LiSc has a foundation that makes $100k, 0% loans to important projects in the community. they can do up to $1.2 million a year, in $100k increments. Such funding opportunities may be available through the Greater Kc LiSc.

additionally, LiSc has invested $222M in transit oriented development projects nationwide, which has leveraged over $1 billion in total development investment along streetcar corridors. examples include, Boston, Los angeles, phoenix, and Minneapolis.

note: LiSc is currently using its funding products in connection with the phoenix streetcar initiative to support redevelopment along its existing rail line with some focus on a new four-mile second phase streetcar extension currently under construction.

Flexible; undetermined. Flexible; primarily collateral development but could include stations and other community , commercial, and residential developments within and along streetcar line.

520


not-FoR-pRoFIt suppoRt – lIVIng cItIes

Living cities is a not-for-profit organization that implements the priorities of 22 of the world’s largest foundations and financial institutions to create opportunities for low-income persons and their communities.

Living cities has approved grants for transportation and toD projects across the country.

in Denver, Living cities has made a grant to connect low-income residents to middle-skill job opportunities and expand resources for both economic development lending and affordable housing in connection with Denver’s $6.7 billion Fastracks project, one of the largest mass transit projects currently under construction in the United States, that will extend fixed-guideway transit service beyond the three existing light rail corridors and extensive bus system.

in San Francisco, Living cities supported a grant to align toD investments with a regional economic development and workforce development strategy. Living cities has also funded equitable toD financing systems and is working on a transit procurement model that will help formulate economic development and employment opportunities for low-income residents. in Minneapolis, Livings cities has partnered with LiSc to encourage toD and related economic development opportunities.

Flexible; undetermined. Flexible; undetermined.

InnoVatIon InVestments

Funding opportunities may be available through innovation investments. Utilizing a partnership with Google, the Kauffman Foundation and others, Kansas city may be able to leverage funds for capital and operation costs.


countYjackson countY poRt ImpRoVement dIstRIct

authorizes a 1% sales and use tax and/or real property assessment, as well as the issuance of bonds, for port improvement projects undertaken by the jackson county port authority. the project must be within jackson county, Missouri, excluding the corporate limits of Kansas city, Missouri. project may include the acquisition, operations, maintenance, rehabilitation or construction of any building or infrastructure determined by the port authority. the sales, use and property proceeds may, pursuant to a statutory amendment in 2012, must be used for economic development projects. piD is approved by a simple majority of property owners in the piD district.


ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

521


not-FoR-pRoFIt suppoRt – lIVIng cItIes

Living cities is a not-for-profit organization that implements the priorities of 22 of the world’s largest foundations and financial institutions to create opportunities for low-income persons and their communities.

Living cities has approved grants for transportation and toD projects across the country.

in Denver, Living cities has made a grant to connect low-income residents to middle-skill job opportunities and expand resources for both economic development lending and affordable housing in connection with Denver’s $6.7 billion Fastracks project, one of the largest mass transit projects currently under construction in the United States, that will extend fixed-guideway transit service beyond the three existing light rail corridors and extensive bus system.

in San Francisco, Living cities supported a grant to align toD investments with a regional economic development and workforce development strategy. Living cities has also funded equitable toD financing systems and is working on a transit procurement model that will help formulate economic development and employment opportunities for low-income residents. in Minneapolis, Livings cities has partnered with LiSc to encourage toD and related economic development opportunities.

Flexible; undetermined. Flexible; undetermined.

InnoVatIon InVestments

Funding opportunities may be available through innovation investments. Utilizing a partnership with Google, the Kauffman Foundation and others, Kansas city may be able to leverage funds for capital and operation costs.


countYjackson countY poRt ImpRoVement dIstRIct

authorizes a 1% sales and use tax and/or real property assessment, as well as the issuance of bonds, for port improvement projects undertaken by the jackson county port authority. the project must be within jackson county, Missouri, excluding the corporate limits of Kansas city, Missouri. project may include the acquisition, operations, maintenance, rehabilitation or construction of any building or infrastructure determined by the port authority. the sales, use and property proceeds may, pursuant to a statutory amendment in 2012, must be used for economic development projects. piD is approved by a simple majority of property owners in the piD district.


522


countY tIF provides that increased property tax and a portion of other revenues generated by the new development are captured and placed in a special fund to pay for the costs of redeveloping the area.

the development may also capture up to 50% of certain locally imposed taxes (commonly referred to as economic activity taxes or “eatS”) such as local sales, franchise taxes and utility taxes and local earnings taxes to fund project costs.

certain new state revenues (one-half of general state sales tax or one-half of state individual income tax withheld from new employees in the redevelopment area) generated by a redevelopment project may be captured under limited circumstances where the area is blighted and is located in either an enterprise zone, federal empowerment zone, or a central business district or urban core area with at least one 50 year old building and that suffers from 20 year pattern of declining population or property tax revenue. State statutes also authorize bonds to be issued that are paid from the piLots and eats generated in the redevelopment area.

note: St. Louis utilized $4.1M in tiF funds for Loop.

Flexible and undetermined. Undetermined.

countY uRban RoadwaY sYstem

cUrS is authorized pursuant to the jackson county code chapter 28. Under the cUrS program, the city may request the county to credit the cUrS account of the city in an amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the Special road and Bridge tax collected by the county from property situated within the corporate limits of the city in any given year. the collected cUrS monies can be used for county approved projects which must be within roads that contribute to the county roadway system.

Flexible and undetermined. Flexible and undetermined.

sale oF countY land; land tRust pRopeRtY conVeYance

publicly owned lands near streetcar lines may be considered as funding opportunities for the system. Surplus, unwanted or underutilized lands can be sold to the private sector or the value of the lands might be counted as part of a local match required for federal grants.


localcdbg FoRwaRd- FundIng

Local governments may pledge their current and future Section 106 or 108 HUD funding as a local match and guarantee for loans.

Based upon a stated multiplier (e.g. 20 times current funding base).

Flexible, provided the use meets Section 106/Section 108 criteria.

poRt authoRItY oF kansas cItY, mIssouRI poRt ImpRoVement dIstRIct

Same as jackson county port improvement District, except must be located in Kansas city, Missouri.


new oR exIstIng paRkIng meteR ReVenues

all or a determined portion of new or existing on-street metered parking and public off-street parking and increased meter rates could provide revenue to construct and/or operate the streetcar.


kansas cItY conVentIon and VIsItoRs assocIatIon hotel tax IncRement

all or a determined portion of KccVa’s hotel/motel occupancy and a business license fee generated after the construction of streetcar could provide revenue to construct and/or operate the streetcar. potentially viable source following passage of tourism & Hotel tax exemption removal on april 2, 2013.


tax abatement pIlot establish city policy for payment in lieu of taxes for chapter 99, chapter 100, and chapter 353 property tax abatement programs to include dedicated allocation for streetcar maintenance and operations. potential enhanced requirement for developments within benefit area of streetcar.

Flexible and undetermined. Flexible; likely operations and maintenance.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

523


countY tIF provides that increased property tax and a portion of other revenues generated by the new development are captured and placed in a special fund to pay for the costs of redeveloping the area.

the development may also capture up to 50% of certain locally imposed taxes (commonly referred to as economic activity taxes or “eatS”) such as local sales, franchise taxes and utility taxes and local earnings taxes to fund project costs.

certain new state revenues (one-half of general state sales tax or one-half of state individual income tax withheld from new employees in the redevelopment area) generated by a redevelopment project may be captured under limited circumstances where the area is blighted and is located in either an enterprise zone, federal empowerment zone, or a central business district or urban core area with at least one 50 year old building and that suffers from 20 year pattern of declining population or property tax revenue. State statutes also authorize bonds to be issued that are paid from the piLots and eats generated in the redevelopment area.

note: St. Louis utilized $4.1M in tiF funds for Loop.

Flexible and undetermined. Undetermined.

countY uRban RoadwaY sYstem

cUrS is authorized pursuant to the jackson county code chapter 28. Under the cUrS program, the city may request the county to credit the cUrS account of the city in an amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the Special road and Bridge tax collected by the county from property situated within the corporate limits of the city in any given year. the collected cUrS monies can be used for county approved projects which must be within roads that contribute to the county roadway system.


sale oF countY land; land tRust pRopeRtY conVeYance

publicly owned lands near streetcar lines may be considered as funding opportunities for the system. Surplus, unwanted or underutilized lands can be sold to the private sector or the value of the lands might be counted as part of a local match required for federal grants.


localcdbg FoRwaRd- FundIng

Local governments may pledge their current and future Section 106 or 108 HUD funding as a local match and guarantee for loans.

Based upon a stated multiplier (e.g. 20 times current funding base).

Flexible, provided the use meets Section 106/Section 108 criteria.

poRt authoRItY oF kansas cItY, mIssouRI poRt ImpRoVement dIstRIct

Same as jackson county port improvement District, except must be located in Kansas city, Missouri.


new oR exIstIng paRkIng meteR ReVenues

all or a determined portion of new or existing on-street metered parking and public off-street parking and increased meter rates could provide revenue to construct and/or operate the streetcar.


kansas cItY conVentIon and VIsItoRs assocIatIon hotel tax IncRement

all or a determined portion of KccVa’s hotel/motel occupancy and a business license fee generated after the construction of streetcar could provide revenue to construct and/or operate the streetcar. potentially viable source following passage of tourism & Hotel tax exemption removal on april 2, 2013.


tax abatement pIlot establish city policy for payment in lieu of taxes for chapter 99, chapter 100, and chapter 353 property tax abatement programs to include dedicated allocation for streetcar maintenance and operations. potential enhanced requirement for developments within benefit area of streetcar.


524


deVelopment code RequIRements

amend Development code to require city proportional payment into streetcar system for maintenance and operations. Formula similar to cash in lieu of land dedication formula used by parks Department. potential enhanced requirement for developments within benefit area of streetcar.


cItY deVelopeR tax IncRement FInancIng

Same as county tiF, above. city could establish a tiF District to overlay the streetcar system. this would enable the city to act as both transit and property developer around new transit stations/hubs. the benefits would include reaping the revenues from the development projects and ensuring that high-density planning intentions that would support the infrastructure are built into place. the tiF revenues could then be used for debt service for streetcar financing or operating costs. the city could then borrow against the predicted uplift in tax revenues.

Flexible and undetermined. capital infrastructure or operations.

pRIVate deVelopeR tax IncRement FInancIng

Same as above, except the city could create a tiF district to overlay the streetcar line and then grant development rights to a private developer. this would allow the city to capture the actual incremental increase of eats and piLots generated by development along the streetcar line that undertaken by private developers, and could include a profit-share arrangement whereby the private construction developer could share in the value capture.

note: Several transit projects have been financed using this method. examples include the new transbay transit center in San Francisco, Denver’s Union Station, the Dulles Metrorail project in Washington, Dc, and the rail+property model utilized by Hong Kong’s Mtr corporation (discussed below).


RedIRected tax IncRement FInancIng (unutIlIzed IncRement In specIal allocatIon Fund geneRated bY unRelated appRoVed tIF plans)

potential use of unutilized increment in special allocation funds generated by unrelated approved city or county tiF plans might be applied to streetcar local match. For example, Maincor secured $9.6 million in funds generated by the Federal reserve Bank from the Southtown tax increment Financing (tiF) in 2007. $3.5 million of these funds to be used to help implement the corridor plan and $6.1 million for public improvements to penn Valley park, neither of which were within the Southtown tiF project area.

plan dependent; flexible and undetermined.. Subject to policies of tiF commission and authorization by Kansas city, Missouri city council.

“RaIl + pRopeRtY” masteR deVelopeR

the city could emulate Hong Kong’s very successful “rail+property” value capture model. a variation on a p3 and tiF, the rail+property approach involves identifying land within the streetcar-designated “benefit zone” and providing a private developer with the right to construct and develop new transit oriented improvements (potentially, but not necessarily, using a taxpayer subsidy) on such property, and thereafter reap the direct land value increase generated by operating, selling or leasing these developments, all in consideration for the private developer providing the upfront investment of capital in the streetcar rail infrastructure.

in Hong Kong, its transit developer, Mtr, leases/sells its development rights to a third-party for upfront cash, sells/leases the toD development it or its third-party assignee has constructed, and also provides property management services. the model has allowed Mtr to finance, build and operate most of Hong Kong’s transit infrastructure.

note: the transit financing model also been used in Beijing, London, and Stockholm.


ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

525


deVelopment code RequIRements

amend Development code to require city proportional payment into streetcar system for maintenance and operations. Formula similar to cash in lieu of land dedication formula used by parks Department. potential enhanced requirement for developments within benefit area of streetcar.


cItY deVelopeR tax IncRement FInancIng

Same as county tiF, above. city could establish a tiF District to overlay the streetcar system. this would enable the city to act as both transit and property developer around new transit stations/hubs. the benefits would include reaping the revenues from the development projects and ensuring that high-density planning intentions that would support the infrastructure are built into place. the tiF revenues could then be used for debt service for streetcar financing or operating costs. the city could then borrow against the predicted uplift in tax revenues.

Flexible and undetermined. capital infrastructure or operations.

pRIVate deVelopeR tax IncRement FInancIng

Same as above, except the city could create a tiF district to overlay the streetcar line and then grant development rights to a private developer. this would allow the city to capture the actual incremental increase of eats and piLots generated by development along the streetcar line that undertaken by private developers, and could include a profit-share arrangement whereby the private construction developer could share in the value capture.

note: Several transit projects have been financed using this method. examples include the new transbay transit center in San Francisco, Denver’s Union Station, the Dulles Metrorail project in Washington, Dc, and the rail+property model utilized by Hong Kong’s Mtr corporation (discussed below).


RedIRected tax IncRement FInancIng (unutIlIzed IncRement In specIal allocatIon Fund geneRated bY unRelated appRoVed tIF plans)

potential use of unutilized increment in special allocation funds generated by unrelated approved city or county tiF plans might be applied to streetcar local match. For example, Maincor secured $9.6 million in funds generated by the Federal reserve Bank from the Southtown tax increment Financing (tiF) in 2007. $3.5 million of these funds to be used to help implement the corridor plan and $6.1 million for public improvements to penn Valley park, neither of which were within the Southtown tiF project area.

plan dependent; flexible and undetermined.. Subject to policies of tiF commission and authorization by Kansas city, Missouri city council.

“RaIl + pRopeRtY” masteR deVelopeR

the city could emulate Hong Kong’s very successful “rail+property” value capture model. a variation on a p3 and tiF, the rail+property approach involves identifying land within the streetcar-designated “benefit zone” and providing a private developer with the right to construct and develop new transit oriented improvements (potentially, but not necessarily, using a taxpayer subsidy) on such property, and thereafter reap the direct land value increase generated by operating, selling or leasing these developments, all in consideration for the private developer providing the upfront investment of capital in the streetcar rail infrastructure.

in Hong Kong, its transit developer, Mtr, leases/sells its development rights to a third-party for upfront cash, sells/leases the toD development it or its third-party assignee has constructed, and also provides property management services. the model has allowed Mtr to finance, build and operate most of Hong Kong’s transit infrastructure.

note: the transit financing model also been used in Beijing, London, and Stockholm.


526


RIdeRshIp FaRe ReVenues

at present, it is proposed that the Kansas city Streetcar authority will not charge a fare for streetcar ridership on the Downtown streetcar starter line. other established streetcar systems that charge fares cover less than 20% of the streetcar operating costs.

if the city were to charge a ridership fare, in portland, for example, the streetcar “triMet” tickets cost between $1.00 and $2.50, depending upon the hours of utilization, and there are special pass rates for seniors, youth, and large groups. all-year passes cost $200. in Minneapolis, bulk user agreements covering large groups traveling to destination points or high volume user employers are discounted to 50 cents per rider.

Flexible and undetermined. operations and capital infrastructure for future streetcar extensions.

adVeRtIsIng, pRomotIon and maRketIng

Some streetcar systems offer short-term advertising at streetcar stops and advertising spaces marketed on the outside and inside of vehicles. Marketing can also include naming or “sponsorship” rights by regionally based corporations and/or corporations and/or non-profit organizations that provide up-front grants.

note: Based on experience in other cities, lines of length and ridership, advertising could be expected to generate annual revenues in the range of $50,000 to $200,000/yr.

Flexible and undetermined. if bond funding is used for streetcar, private advertising could compromise requirements of tax-exempt issue. could do bifurcated bond issues and segregate if line and catenary were issued with exempt bonds and bonds for cars and stops are constructed using taxable bonds.

Flexible.

paRks depaRtment FundIng

Utilization of parks Department public infrastructure capital improvements program and parks Maintenance Fund for streetscape improvements within established boulevards, including Linwood and portions of the independence avenue line between paseo and Benton Boulevards. potential applicability to operations and maintenance. Utilize funds as local match for public Lands Highways Discretionary Funds grant application. Designation of ccroW (to connect to Linwood and public Lands Highways Discretionary Funds) would increase opportunities for use of parks funds.

Flexible; subject to appropriation. capital infrastructure and maintenance.

gRoup touRs Streetcars rented by private entities for special occasions or events when demand permits.

note: tampa invokes this rental income stream, which is modest. tampa charges $225 per vehicle per hour, with a one- hour minimum during regular service hours, and $325 outside of regular service hours. it also offers guided group tours of city neighborhoods and districts along the streetcar route at a cost of $2.00/$1.00 one-way per person.


sale oF cItY pRopeRtY; land bank/excess cItY pRopeRtY dIsposItIon

publicly owned lands near streetcar lines may be considered as opportunities to raise funds for the system. the surplus lands can be sold, or, alternatively, unused development capacity of publicly owned property can be negotiated for development by the private sector.

portland had a similar transportation land sale that generated $3.1 million, which represented approximately 3 percent of the total capital cost of its streetcar.


pRIVate paRkIng gaRage and lot specIal assessment

create special assessment (property and/or sales tax) applicable to privately owned parking garages and surface parking lots for daily use and/or special events. assessment could be via overlay tDD or piD.


ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

527


RIdeRshIp FaRe ReVenues

at present, it is proposed that the Kansas city Streetcar authority will not charge a fare for streetcar ridership on the Downtown streetcar starter line. other established streetcar systems that charge fares cover less than 20% of the streetcar operating costs.

if the city were to charge a ridership fare, in portland, for example, the streetcar “triMet” tickets cost between $1.00 and $2.50, depending upon the hours of utilization, and there are special pass rates for seniors, youth, and large groups. all-year passes cost $200. in Minneapolis, bulk user agreements covering large groups traveling to destination points or high volume user employers are discounted to 50 cents per rider.

Flexible and undetermined. operations and capital infrastructure for future streetcar extensions.

adVeRtIsIng, pRomotIon and maRketIng

Some streetcar systems offer short-term advertising at streetcar stops and advertising spaces marketed on the outside and inside of vehicles. Marketing can also include naming or “sponsorship” rights by regionally based corporations and/or corporations and/or non-profit organizations that provide up-front grants.

note: Based on experience in other cities, lines of length and ridership, advertising could be expected to generate annual revenues in the range of $50,000 to $200,000/yr.

Flexible and undetermined. if bond funding is used for streetcar, private advertising could compromise requirements of tax-exempt issue. could do bifurcated bond issues and segregate if line and catenary were issued with exempt bonds and bonds for cars and stops are constructed using taxable bonds.

Flexible.

paRks depaRtment FundIng

Utilization of parks Department public infrastructure capital improvements program and parks Maintenance Fund for streetscape improvements within established boulevards, including Linwood and portions of the independence avenue line between paseo and Benton Boulevards. potential applicability to operations and maintenance. Utilize funds as local match for public Lands Highways Discretionary Funds grant application. Designation of ccroW (to connect to Linwood and public Lands Highways Discretionary Funds) would increase opportunities for use of parks funds.

Flexible; subject to appropriation. capital infrastructure and maintenance.

gRoup touRs Streetcars rented by private entities for special occasions or events when demand permits.

note: tampa invokes this rental income stream, which is modest. tampa charges $225 per vehicle per hour, with a one- hour minimum during regular service hours, and $325 outside of regular service hours. it also offers guided group tours of city neighborhoods and districts along the streetcar route at a cost of $2.00/$1.00 one-way per person.


sale oF cItY pRopeRtY; land bank/excess cItY pRopeRtY dIsposItIon

publicly owned lands near streetcar lines may be considered as opportunities to raise funds for the system. the surplus lands can be sold, or, alternatively, unused development capacity of publicly owned property can be negotiated for development by the private sector.

portland had a similar transportation land sale that generated $3.1 million, which represented approximately 3 percent of the total capital cost of its streetcar.


pRIVate paRkIng gaRage and lot specIal assessment

create special assessment (property and/or sales tax) applicable to privately owned parking garages and surface parking lots for daily use and/or special events. assessment could be via overlay tDD or piD.


528


laRge emploYeR paRkIng specIal assessment waIVeR FoR pRIVate

Large employers are a promising source of support since the streetcar system may help reduce some of their own parking costs. For employers that provide discounted travel vouchers for use of the Kcata bus rapid transit and bus systems, cost savings may be realized through the streetcar system which, if based upon the downtown starter line, may be fare free. through private donation of a portion of the savings, large employers may be able to help defray capital or routine operational costs.


publIc ImpRoVements adVIsoRY commIttee

Funds

city may allocate a single or multi-year obligation of in-district or citywide piac funds to the streetcar project.

Subject to appropriation. capital infrastructure.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

529


laRge emploYeR paRkIng specIal assessment waIVeR FoR pRIVate

Large employers are a promising source of support since the streetcar system may help reduce some of their own parking costs. For employers that provide discounted travel vouchers for use of the Kcata bus rapid transit and bus systems, cost savings may be realized through the streetcar system which, if based upon the downtown starter line, may be fare free. through private donation of a portion of the savings, large employers may be able to help defray capital or routine operational costs.


publIc ImpRoVements adVIsoRY commIttee

Funds

city may allocate a single or multi-year obligation of in-district or citywide piac funds to the streetcar project.

Subject to appropriation. capital infrastructure.

530

Sche

dule 1 ‐ 3.21

.14

Kansas City

, Missouri

Streetcar P

roject ‐ Ph

ase II An

alysis ‐ With

CCR

OW

Phase II Issue Size ‐ 1.5x Coverage ‐ 3

0 Year

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

K

Tax‐Exem

pt

Approp

riatio

n

Projected

Serie

s 201

4ANet Reven

ues

Serie

s 20

17 ‐ $2

15.043

million Project P

roceed

s (4)

Revenu

es$6

3,95

5,00

0Av

ailable for

5.85

% ‐ 3/1/20

17Co

mbine

d

Fiscal

Available for

3/25

/201

4 ‐ 4

.39%

Phase II After

Reserve

Coverage

Streetcar

Fiscal

Year

Debt Service (1

)De

bt Service

(2)

Serie

s 201

4APrincipal

Interest

Fund

@ 0%

Debt Service

Serie

s 201

7De

bt Service

Year

2015

‐$

4,43

3,21

3$

‐$

4,43

3,21

3$

2015

2016

‐

4,43

2,80

0

‐

4,43

2,80

0

2016

2017

‐

4,43

5,45

0

‐

‐$

‐$

‐$

‐$

4,43

5,45

0

2017

2018

31,488

,651

4,43

4,47

5

27,054

,176

4,27

5,00

0

13,759

,931

‐

18,034

,931

1.50

x22

,469

,406

2018

2019

28,602

,570

4,43

3,95

0

24,168

,620

2,55

0,00

0

13,560

,300

‐

16,110

,300

1.50

x20

,544

,250

2019

2020

28,867

,196

4,43

3,25

0

24,433

,946

2,88

5,00

0

13,401

,326

‐

16,286

,326

1.50

x20

,719

,576

2020

2021

28,899

,558

4,43

5,87

5

24,463

,683

3,08

0,00

0

13,226

,850

‐

16,306

,850

1.50

x20

,742

,725

2021

2022

29,164

,459

4,43

5,87

5

24,728

,584

3,44

5,00

0

13,035

,994

‐

16,480

,994

1.50

x20

,916

,869

2022

2023

29,192

,341

4,43

6,25

0

24,756

,091

3,67

5,00

0

12,827

,734

‐

16,502

,734

1.50

x20

,938

,984

2023

2024

29,457

,299

4,43

6,75

0

25,020

,549

4,07

5,00

0

12,601

,046

‐

16,676

,046

1.50

x21

,112

,796

2024

2025

29,480

,382

4,43

7,12

5

25,043

,257

4,34

0,00

0

12,354

,908

‐

16,694

,908

1.50

x21

,132

,033

2025

2026

29,745

,166

4,43

7,12

5

25,308

,041

4,78

0,00

0

12,088

,148

‐

16,868

,148

1.50

x21

,305

,273

2026

2027

29,763

,119

4,43

6,50

0

25,326

,619

5,08

0,00

0

11,799

,743

‐

16,879

,743

1.50

x21

,316

,243

2027

2028

30,027

,485

4,43

5,00

0

25,592

,485

5,57

0,00

0

11,488

,230

‐

17,058

,230

1.50

x21

,493

,230

2028

2029

30,039

,959

4,43

2,37

5

25,607

,584

5,91

5,00

0

11,152

,294

‐

17,067

,294

1.50

x21

,499

,669

2029

2030

30,303

,649

4,43

3,25

0

25,870

,399

6,45

5,00

0

10,790

,471

‐

17,245

,471

1.50

x21

,678

,721

2030

2031

30,310

,281

4,43

2,25

0

25,878

,031

6,85

0,00

0

10,401

,300

‐

17,251

,300

1.50

x21

,683

,550

2031

2032

30,573

,022

4,43

4,00

0

26,139

,022

7,44

0,00

0

9,98

3,31

8

‐

17,423

,318

1.50

x21

,857

,318

2032

2033

30,573

,431

4,43

3,12

5

26,140

,306

7,89

0,00

0

9,53

4,91

5

‐

17,424

,915

1.50

x21

,858

,040

2033

2034

30,834

,935

4,43

4,25

0

26,400

,685

8,54

5,00

0

9,05

4,19

1

‐

17,599

,191

1.50

x22

,033

,441

2034

2035

30,828

,723

4,43

2,00

0

26,396

,723

9,05

5,00

0

8,53

9,39

1

‐

17,594

,391

1.50

x22

,026

,391

2035

2036

31,088

,687

4,43

5,87

5

26,652

,812

9,78

0,00

0

7,98

8,46

8

‐

17,768

,468

1.50

x22

,204

,343

2036

2037

31,075

,436

4,43

5,37

5

26,640

,061

10,360

,000

7,39

9,37

3

‐

17,759

,373

1.50

x22

,194

,748

2037

2038

31,333

,540

4,43

4,25

0

(3)

26,899

,290

11,160

,000

6,76

9,91

3

‐

17,929

,913

1.50

x22

,364

,163

2038

2039

25,347

,244

25,347

,244

10,765

,000

6,12

8,60

6

‐

16,893

,606

1.50

x16

,893

,606

2039

2040

25,489

,595

25,489

,595

11,515

,000

5,47

6,91

6

‐

16,991

,916

1.50

x16

,991

,916

2040

2041

25,463

,762

25,463

,762

12,190

,000

4,78

3,54

5

‐

16,973

,545

1.50

x16

,973

,545

2041

2042

25,601

,115

25,601

,115

13,020

,000

4,04

6,15

3

‐

17,066

,153

1.50

x17

,066

,153

2042

2043

25,566

,762

25,566

,762

13,780

,000

3,26

2,25

3

‐

17,042

,253

1.50

x17

,042

,253

2043

2044

16,991

,275

16,991

,275

8,72

0,00

0

2,60

4,12

8

‐

11,324

,128

1.50

x11

,324

,128

2044

2045

16,947

,909

16,947

,909

9,21

5,00

0

2,07

9,52

9

‐

11,294

,529

1.50

x11

,294

,529

2045

2046

16,899

,844

16,899

,844

9,74

0,00

0

1,52

5,09

5

‐

11,265

,095

1.50

x11

,265

,095

2046

2047

16,846

,947

16,846

,947

10,290

,000

939,21

8

‐

11,229

,218

1.50

x11

,229

,218

2047

2048

10,910

,000

319,11

8

(18,03

4,93

1)

(6,805

,814

)

(6,805

,814

)

2048

826,80

4,33

9$

106,43

0,38

8$

733,67

5,41

4$

237,35

0,00

0$

262,92

2,40

0$

(18,03

4,93

1)$

482,23

7,46

9$

588,66

7,85

7$

(1) Re

venu

es illustrated for fiscal years 201

8‐20

47 only. A

ll revenu

es provide

d by

Dou

g Ston

e.(2) Final net deb

t service, callable 20

19. To

tal issue

size produ

ces $

62,900

,000

and

fund

s Deb

t Service Reserve Fun

ds (D

SRF).

(3) Final year d

ebt service net of D

SRF at 0% interest earnings.

(4) Project p

roceed

s include

$10

million in proceed

s tow

ards initial Phase II amou

nt financed

prio

r to Serie

s 201

7 issuance.

Tax‐exem

pt eligibility sub

ject to

review

and

determination by

bon

d/tax coun

sel. Req

uired 1.5x cov

erage for illu

stratio

n on

ly, actua

l cov

erage level dep

ende

nt on

ratin

g agen

cy re

view

and

investor m

arketability.

Tax‐Exem

pt Reven

ue Bon

ds

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

531

Sche

dule 2 ‐ 3.21

.14

Kansas City

, Missouri

Streetcar P

roject ‐ Ph

ase II An

alysis ‐ With

out C

CROW

Phase II Issue Size ‐ 1.5x Coverage ‐ 3

0 Year

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

K

Tax‐Exem

pt

Approp

riatio

n

Projected

Serie

s 201

4ANet Reven

ues

Serie

s 20

17 ‐ $1

77.459

million Project P

roceed

s (4)

Revenu

es$6

3,95

5,00

0Av

ailable for

5.85

% ‐ 3/1/20

17Co

mbine

d

Fiscal

Available for

3/25

/201

4 ‐ 4

.39%

Phase II After

Reserve

Coverage

Streetcar

Fiscal

Year

Debt Service (1

)De

bt Service

(2)

Serie

s 201

4APrincipal

Interest

Fund

@ 0%

Debt Service

Serie

s 201

7De

bt Service

Year

2015

‐$

4,43

3,21

3$

‐$

4,43

3,21

3$

2015

2016

‐

4,43

2,80

0

‐

4,43

2,80

0

2016

2017

‐

4,43

5,45

0

‐

‐$

‐$

‐$

‐$

4,43

5,45

0

2017

2018

28,144

,016

4,43

4,47

5

23,709

,541

4,42

0,00

0

11,383

,808

‐

15,803

,808

1.50

x20

,238

,283

2018

2019

24,329

,954

4,43

3,95

0

19,896

,004

2,06

5,00

0

11,194

,121

‐

13,259

,121

1.50

x17

,693

,071

2019

2020

24,537

,447

4,43

3,25

0

20,104

,197

2,33

5,00

0

11,065

,421

‐

13,400

,421

1.50

x17

,833

,671

2020

2021

24,569

,767

4,43

5,87

5

20,133

,892

2,49

5,00

0

10,924

,144

‐

13,419

,144

1.50

x17

,855

,019

2021

2022

24,776

,961

4,43

5,87

5

20,341

,086

2,79

0,00

0

10,769

,558

‐

13,559

,558

1.50

x17

,995

,433

2022

2023

24,805

,378

4,43

6,25

0

20,369

,128

2,97

5,00

0

10,600

,931

‐

13,575

,931

1.50

x18

,012

,181

2023

2024

25,012

,067

4,43

6,75

0

20,575

,317

3,29

5,00

0

10,417

,534

‐

13,712

,534

1.50

x18

,149

,284

2024

2025

25,036

,300

4,43

7,12

5

20,599

,175

3,51

0,00

0

10,218

,488

‐

13,728

,488

1.50

x18

,165

,613

2025

2026

25,242

,264

4,43

7,12

5

20,805

,139

3,86

5,00

0

10,002

,769

‐

13,867

,769

1.50

x18

,304

,894

2026

2027

25,262

,017

4,43

6,50

0

20,825

,517

4,11

0,00

0

9,76

9,50

0

‐

13,879

,500

1.50

x18

,316

,000

2027

2028

25,467

,028

4,43

5,00

0

21,032

,028

4,50

0,00

0

9,51

7,65

8

‐

14,017

,658

1.50

x18

,452

,658

2028

2029

25,481

,992

4,43

2,37

5

21,049

,617

4,78

5,00

0

9,24

6,07

1

‐

14,031

,071

1.50

x18

,463

,446

2029

2030

25,685

,805

4,43

3,25

0

21,252

,555

5,21

0,00

0

8,95

3,71

8

‐

14,163

,718

1.50

x18

,596

,968

2030

2031

25,695

,656

4,43

2,25

0

21,263

,406

5,53

5,00

0

8,63

9,42

6

‐

14,174

,426

1.50

x18

,606

,676

2031

2032

25,898

,016

4,43

4,00

0

21,464

,016

6,00

5,00

0

8,30

1,88

1

‐

14,306

,881

1.50

x18

,740

,881

2032

2033

25,902

,415

4,43

3,12

5

21,469

,290

6,37

0,00

0

7,93

9,91

3

‐

14,309

,913

1.50

x18

,743

,038

2033

2034

26,103

,052

4,43

4,25

0

21,668

,802

6,89

0,00

0

7,55

2,05

8

‐

14,442

,058

1.50

x18

,876

,308

2034

2035

26,101

,646

4,43

2,00

0

21,669

,646

7,30

5,00

0

7,13

6,85

4

‐

14,441

,854

1.50

x18

,873

,854

2035

2036

26,300

,276

4,43

5,87

5

21,864

,401

7,88

0,00

0

6,69

2,69

3

‐

14,572

,693

1.50

x19

,008

,568

2036

2037

26,292

,692

4,43

5,37

5

21,857

,317

8,35

0,00

0

6,21

7,96

5

‐

14,567

,965

1.50

x19

,003

,340

2037

2038

26,489

,015

4,43

4,25

0

(3)

22,054

,765

8,99

0,00

0

5,71

0,77

0

‐

14,700

,770

1.50

x19

,135

,020

2038

2039

20,509

,297

20,509

,297

8,47

0,00

0

5,20

0,06

5

‐

13,670

,065

1.50

x13

,670

,065

2039

2040

20,589

,445

20,589

,445

9,03

5,00

0

4,68

8,04

4

‐

13,723

,044

1.50

x13

,723

,044

2040

2041

20,571

,149

20,571

,149

9,56

5,00

0

4,14

3,99

4

‐

13,708

,994

1.50

x13

,708

,994

2041

2042

20,645

,900

20,645

,900

10,195

,000

3,56

6,01

4

‐

13,761

,014

1.50

x13

,761

,014

2042

2043

20,620

,098

20,620

,098

10,790

,000

2,95

2,20

3

‐

13,742

,203

1.50

x13

,742

,203

2043

2044

15,656

,284

15,656

,284

8,03

5,00

0

2,40

1,57

1

‐

10,436

,571

1.50

x10

,436

,571

2044

2045

15,622

,536

15,622

,536

8,49

5,00

0

1,91

8,06

9

‐

10,413

,069

1.50

x10

,413

,069

2045

2046

15,584

,645

15,584

,645

8,98

0,00

0

1,40

6,92

5

‐

10,386

,925

1.50

x10

,386

,925

2046

2047

15,542

,493

15,542

,493

9,49

5,00

0

866,53

1

‐

10,361

,531

1.50

x10

,361

,531

2047

2048

10,065

,000

294,40

1

(15,80

3,80

8)

(5,444

,406

)

(5,444

,406

)

2048

702,47

5,60

9$

106,43

0,38

8$

609,34

6,68

4$

196,80

5,00

0$

219,69

3,09

4$

(15,80

3,80

8)$

400,69

4,28

6$

507,12

4,67

5$

(1) Re

venu

es illustrated for fiscal years 201

8‐20

47 only. A

ll revenu

es provide

d by

Dou

g Ston

e.(2) Final net deb

t service, callable 20

19. To

tal issue

size produ

ces $

62,900

,000

and

fund

s Deb

t Service Reserve Fun

ds (D

SRF).

(3) Final year d

ebt service net of D

SRF at 0% interest earnings.

(4) Project p

roceed

s include

$10

million in proceed

s tow

ards initial Phase II amou

nt financed

prio

r to Serie

s 201

7 issuance.

Tax‐exem

pt eligibility sub

ject to

review

and

determination by

bon

d/tax coun

sel. Req

uired 1.5x cov

erage for illu

stratio

n on

ly, actua

l cov

erage level dep

ende

nt on

ratin

g agen

cy re

view

and

investor m

arketability.

Tax‐Exem

pt Reven

ue Bon

ds

532

REVE

NU

E TA

BLE

- WIT

H CO

UN

TRY

CLU

B RI

GHT

OF

WAY

EXT

ENSI

ON

STAR

TER

LIN

EM

AIN

EXT

ENSI

ON

TO

UM

KC

INDE

PEN

DEN

CE

AVE

APPR

OX

2.2

MIL

ES

LIN

WO

OD

BLVD

AP

PRO

X 1.

8 M

ILES

COU

NTR

Y CL

UB

ROW

UM

KC T

O

WAL

DO

SURF

ACE

PARK

ING

ASSE

SSM

ENTS

120

18 $

29,

581,

266

$

4,7

75,7

51

$

2

20,0

31

$

34,

577,

048

$

(3

,088

,397

) $

31,4

88,6

51

$

20

,992

,434

2

2019

$

2

9,88

0,06

6 $

4

,775

,751

$

3,

583,

061

$

3

52,3

18

$

2

47,6

22

$

2,5

48,1

22

$

2

15,6

30

$

41

,602

,570

$

(

13,0

00,0

00)

$

28

,602

,570

$

19,0

68,3

80

320

20 $

30,

178,

867

$

4,8

71,2

66

$

3,6

54,7

22

$

3

59,3

64

$

2

52,5

75

$

2,5

99,0

84

$

2

11,3

18

$

42

,127

,196

$

(

13,2

60,0

00)

$

28

,867

,196

$

19,2

44,7

97

420

21 $

30,

480,

656

$

4,8

71,2

66

$

3,6

54,7

22

$

3

59,3

64

$

2

52,5

75

$

2,5

99,0

84

$

2

07,0

91

$

42

,424

,758

$

(

13,5

25,2

00)

$

28

,899

,558

$

19,2

66,3

72

520

22 $

30,

785,

462

$

4,9

68,6

91

$

3,7

27,8

17

$

3

66,5

52

$

2

57,6

26

$

2,6

51,0

66

$

2

02,9

50

$

42

,960

,163

$

(

13,7

95,7

04)

$

29

,164

,459

$

19,4

42,9

73

620

23 $

31,

093,

317

$

4,9

68,6

91

$

3,7

27,8

17

$

3

66,5

52

$

2

57,6

26

$

2,6

51,0

66

$

1

98,8

91

$

43

,263

,959

$

(

14,0

71,6

18)

$

29

,192

,341

$

19,4

61,5

60

720

24 $

31,

404,

250

$

5,0

68,0

65

$

3,8

02,3

73

$

3

73,8

83

$

2

62,7

79

$

2,7

04,0

87

$

1

94,9

13

$

43

,810

,349

$

(

14,3

53,0

50)

$

29

,457

,299

$

19,6

38,1

99

820

25 $

31,

718,

292

$

5,0

68,0

65

$

3,8

02,3

73

$

3

73,8

83

$

2

62,7

79

$

2,7

04,0

87

$

1

91,0

15

$

44

,120

,493

$

(

14,6

40,1

11)

$

29

,480

,382

$

19,6

53,5

88

920

26 $

32,

035,

475

$

5,1

69,4

27

$

3,8

78,4

21

$

3

81,3

60

$

2

68,0

34

$

2,7

58,1

69

$

1

87,1

94

$

44

,678

,080

$

(

14,9

32,9

14)

$

29

,745

,166

$

19,8

30,1

11

1020

27 $

32,

355,

830

$

5,1

69,4

27

$

3,8

78,4

21

$

3

81,3

60

$

2

68,0

34

$

2,7

58,1

69

$

1

83,4

50

$

44

,994

,691

$

(

15,2

31,5

72)

$

29

,763

,119

$

19,8

42,0

79

1120

28 $

32,

679,

388

$

5,2

72,8

15

$

3,9

55,9

89

$

3

88,9

87

$

2

73,3

95

$

2,8

13,3

32

$

1

79,7

81

$

45

,563

,688

$

(

15,5

36,2

03)

$

30

,027

,485

$

20,0

18,3

23

1220

29 $

33,

006,

182

$

5,2

72,8

15

$

3,9

55,9

89

$

3

88,9

87

$

2

73,3

95

$

2,8

13,3

32

$

1

76,1

86

$

45

,886

,886

$

(

15,8

46,9

27)

$

30

,039

,959

$

20,0

26,6

39

1320

30 $

33,

336,

244

$

5,3

78,2

71

$

4,0

35,1

09

$

3

96,7

67

$

2

78,8

63

$

2,8

69,5

99

$

1

72,6

62

$

46

,467

,515

$

(

16,1

63,8

66)

$

30

,303

,649

$

20,2

02,4

33

1420

31 $

33,

669,

606

$

5,3

78,2

71

$

4,0

35,1

09

$

3

96,7

67

$

2

78,8

63

$

2,8

69,5

99

$

1

69,2

09

$

46

,797

,424

$

(

16,4

87,1

43)

$

30

,310

,281

$

20,2

06,8

54

1520

32 $

34,

006,

303

$

5,4

85,8

37

$

4,1

15,8

11

$

4

04,7

03

$

2

84,4

40

$

2,9

26,9

91

$

1

65,8

25

$

47

,389

,908

$

(

16,8

16,8

86)

$

30

,573

,022

$

20,3

82,0

15

1620

33 $

34,

346,

366

$

5,4

85,8

37

$

4,1

15,8

11

$

4

04,7

03

$

2

84,4

40

$

2,9

26,9

91

$

1

62,5

08

$

47

,726

,655

$

(

17,1

53,2

24)

$

30

,573

,431

$

20,3

82,2

87

1720

34 $

34,

689,

829

$

5,5

95,5

54

$

4,1

98,1

27

$

4

12,7

97

$

2

90,1

29

$

2,9

85,5

30

$

1

59,2

58

$

48

,331

,224

$

(

17,4

96,2

88)

$

30

,834

,935

$

20,5

56,6

24

1820

35 $

35,

036,

728

$

5,5

95,5

54

$

4,1

98,1

27

$

4

12,7

97

$

2

90,1

29

$

2,9

85,5

30

$

1

56,0

73

$

48

,674

,937

$

(

17,8

46,2

14)

$

30

,828

,723

$

20,5

52,4

82

1920

36 $

35,

387,

095

$

5,7

07,4

65

$

4,2

82,0

90

$

4

21,0

53

$

2

95,9

31

$

3,0

45,2

41

$

1

52,9

51

$

49

,291

,825

$

(

18,2

03,1

38)

$

31

,088

,687

$

20,7

25,7

91

2020

37 $

35,

740,

966

$

5,7

07,4

65

$

4,2

82,0

90

$

4

21,0

53

$

2

95,9

31

$

3,0

45,2

41

$

1

49,8

92

$

49

,642

,637

$

(

18,5

67,2

01)

$

31

,075

,436

$

20,7

16,9

57

2120

38 $

36,

098,

375

$

5,8

21,6

14

$

4,3

67,7

32

$

4

29,4

74

$

3

01,8

50

$

3,1

06,1

46

$

1

46,8

94

$

50

,272

,085

$

(

18,9

38,5

45)

$

31

,333

,540

$

20,8

89,0

26

2220

39 $

36,

459,

359

$

4,3

67,7

32

$

4

29,4

74

$

3

01,8

50

$

3,1

06,1

46

$

44

,664

,560

$

(

19,3

17,3

16)

$

25

,347

,244

$

16,8

98,1

63

2320

40 $

36,

823,

953

$

4,4

55,0

86

$

4

38,0

63

$

3

07,8

87

$

3,1

68,2

69

$

45

,193

,258

$

(

19,7

03,6

62)

$

25

,489

,595

$

16,9

93,0

64

2420

41 $

37,

192,

192

$

4,4

55,0

86

$

4

38,0

63

$

3

07,8

87

$

3,1

68,2

69

$

45

,561

,497

$

(

20,0

97,7

36)

$

25

,463

,762

$

16,9

75,8

41

2520

42 $

37,

564,

114

$

4,5

44,1

88

$

4

46,8

24

$

3

14,0

45

$

3,2

31,6

34

$

46

,100

,805

$

(

20,4

99,6

90)

$

25

,601

,115

$

17,0

67,4

10

2620

43 $

37,

939,

755

$

4,5

44,1

88

$

4

46,8

24

$

3

14,0

45

$

3,2

31,6

34

$

46

,476

,446

$

(

20,9

09,6

84)

$

25

,566

,762

$

17,0

44,5

08

2720

44 $

38,

319,

153

$

38

,319

,153

$

(

21,3

27,8

78)

$

16

,991

,275

$

11,3

27,5

17

2820

45 $

38,

702,

344

$

38

,702

,344

$

(

21,7

54,4

35)

$

16

,947

,909

$

11,2

98,6

06

2920

46 $

39,

089,

368

$

39

,089

,368

$

(

22,1

89,5

24)

$

16

,899

,844

$

11,2

66,5

62

3020

47 $

39,

480,

262

$

39

,480

,262

$

(

22,6

33,3

15)

$

16

,846

,947

$

11,2

31,2

98

$

1

,029

,081

,063

$

105,

632,

147

$

10

1,61

7,98

9 $

9

,991

,970

$

7

,022

,727

$

72,

266,

416

$

3,8

03,7

22

$

1

,334

,191

,785

$

(50

7,38

7,44

5) $

8

26,8

04,3

39

$

551

,202

,893

COVE

RAGE

@1.

5

1%an

nual

ly

2%bi

annu

ally

2%an

nual

lyO

&M

CO

STS

PRO

PERT

Y AS

SESS

MEN

T 1/

2 M

ILE

(REC

EIVE

D JA

NU

ARY

OF

YEAR

INDI

CATE

D)

AFTE

R CO

VERA

GE

TOTA

L

INFL

ATIO

N R

ATES

SALE

S TA

X*D

SRF

appl

ied

to fi

nal b

ond

paym

ent

PRO

PERT

Y AS

SESS

MEN

T

YEAR

SALE

S TA

XTO

TAL

REVE

NU

ESO

&M

CO

STS

REVE

NU

E FO

R DE

BT

SERV

ICE

463

2414

7.1

3/

24/2

014

463

2414

7.3

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

533

REVE

NU

E TA

BLE

- WIT

HOU

T CO

UN

TRY

CLU

B RI

GHT

OF

WAY

EXT

ENSI

ON

STAR

TER

LIN

EM

AIN

EXT

ENSI

ON

TO

UM

KC

INDE

PEN

DEN

CE

AVE

APPR

OX

2.2

MIL

ES

LIN

WO

OD

BLVD

AP

PRO

X 1.

8 M

ILES

SURF

ACE

PARK

ING

ASSE

SSM

ENTS

120

18 $

26,

236,

630

$

4,7

75,7

51

$

2

20,0

31

$

31,

232,

412

$

(3

,088

,397

) $

28,1

44,0

16

$

18

,762

,677

2

2019

$

2

7,04

8,07

2 $

4

,775

,751

$

3,

312,

914

$

2

95,8

37

$

2

81,7

49

$

2

15,6

30

$

35

,929

,954

$

(

11,6

00,0

00)

$

24

,329

,954

$

16,2

19,9

69

320

20 $

27,

318,

553

$

4,8

71,2

66

$

3,3

79,1

73

$

3

01,7

54

$

2

87,3

84

$

2

11,3

18

$

36

,369

,447

$

(

11,8

32,0

00)

$

24

,537

,447

$

16,3

58,2

98

420

21 $

27,

591,

738

$

4,8

71,2

66

$

3,3

79,1

73

$

3

01,7

54

$

2

87,3

84

$

2

07,0

91

$

36

,638

,407

$

(

12,0

68,6

40)

$

24

,569

,767

$

16,3

79,8

44

520

22 $

27,

867,

656

$

4,9

68,6

91

$

3,4

46,7

56

$

3

07,7

89

$

2

93,1

31

$

2

02,9

50

$

37

,086

,974

$

(

12,3

10,0

13)

$

24

,776

,961

$

16,5

17,9

74

620

23 $

28,

146,

332

$

4,9

68,6

91

$

3,4

46,7

56

$

3

07,7

89

$

2

93,1

31

$

1

98,8

91

$

37

,361

,591

$

(

12,5

56,2

13)

$

24

,805

,378

$

16,5

36,9

19

720

24 $

28,

427,

796

$

5,0

68,0

65

$

3,5

15,6

91

$

3

13,9

45

$

2

98,9

94

$

1

94,9

13

$

37

,819

,404

$

(

12,8

07,3

37)

$

25

,012

,067

$

16,6

74,7

11

820

25 $

28,

712,

074

$

5,0

68,0

65

$

3,5

15,6

91

$

3

13,9

45

$

2

98,9

94

$

1

91,0

15

$

38

,099

,784

$

(

13,0

63,4

84)

$

25

,036

,300

$

16,6

90,8

66

920

26 $

28,

999,

194

$

5,1

69,4

27

$

3,5

86,0

05

$

3

20,2

24

$

3

04,9

74

$

1

87,1

94

$

38

,567

,018

$

(

13,3

24,7

54)

$

25

,242

,264

$

16,8

28,1

76

1020

27 $

29,

289,

186

$

5,1

69,4

27

$

3,5

86,0

05

$

3

20,2

24

$

3

04,9

74

$

1

83,4

50

$

38

,853

,266

$

(

13,5

91,2

49)

$

25

,262

,017

$

16,8

41,3

45

1120

28 $

29,

582,

078

$

5,2

72,8

15

$

3,6

57,7

25

$

3

26,6

28

$

3

11,0

73

$

1

79,7

81

$

39

,330

,102

$

(

13,8

63,0

74)

$

25

,467

,028

$

16,9

78,0

19

1220

29 $

29,

877,

899

$

5,2

72,8

15

$

3,6

57,7

25

$

3

26,6

28

$

3

11,0

73

$

1

76,1

86

$

39

,622

,327

$

(

14,1

40,3

35)

$

25

,481

,992

$

16,9

87,9

94

1320

30 $

30,

176,

678

$

5,3

78,2

71

$

3,7

30,8

80

$

3

33,1

61

$

3

17,2

95

$

1

72,6

62

$

40

,108

,947

$

(

14,4

23,1

42)

$

25

,685

,805

$

17,1

23,8

70

1420

31 $

30,

478,

445

$

5,3

78,2

71

$

3,7

30,8

80

$

3

33,1

61

$

3

17,2

95

$

1

69,2

09

$

40

,407

,260

$

(

14,7

11,6

05)

$

25

,695

,656

$

17,1

30,4

37

1520

32 $

30,

783,

229

$

5,4

85,8

37

$

3,8

05,4

97

$

3

39,8

24

$

3

23,6

41

$

1

65,8

25

$

40

,903

,853

$

(

15,0

05,8

37)

$

25

,898

,016

$

17,2

65,3

44

1620

33 $

31,

091,

061

$

5,4

85,8

37

$

3,8

05,4

97

$

3

39,8

24

$

3

23,6

41

$

1

62,5

08

$

41

,208

,369

$

(

15,3

05,9

54)

$

25

,902

,415

$

17,2

68,2

77

1720

34 $

31,

401,

972

$

5,5

95,5

54

$

3,8

81,6

07

$

3

46,6

21

$

3

30,1

14

$

1

59,2

58

$

41

,715

,125

$

(

15,6

12,0

73)

$

26

,103

,052

$

17,4

02,0

35

1820

35 $

31,

715,

992

$

5,5

95,5

54

$

3,8

81,6

07

$

3

46,6

21

$

3

30,1

14

$

1

56,0

73

$

42

,025

,960

$

(

15,9

24,3

14)

$

26

,101

,646

$

17,4

01,0

97

1920

36 $

32,

033,

152

$

5,7

07,4

65

$

3,9

59,2

39

$

3

53,5

53

$

3

36,7

16

$

1

52,9

51

$

42

,543

,076

$

(

16,2

42,8

00)

$

26

,300

,276

$

17,5

33,5

17

2020

37 $

32,

353,

483

$

5,7

07,4

65

$

3,9

59,2

39

$

3

53,5

53

$

3

36,7

16

$

1

49,8

92

$

42

,860

,349

$

(

16,5

67,6

56)

$

26

,292

,692

$

17,5

28,4

61

2120

38 $

32,

677,

018

$

5,8

21,6

14

$

4,0

38,4

24

$

3

60,6

24

$

3

43,4

50

$

1

46,8

94

$

43

,388

,025

$

(

16,8

99,0

10)

$

26

,489

,015

$

17,6

59,3

44

2220

39 $

33,

003,

788

$

4,0

38,4

24

$

3

60,6

24

$

3

43,4

50

$

37

,746

,287

$

(

17,2

36,9

90)

$

20

,509

,297

$

13,6

72,8

65

2320

40 $

33,

333,

826

$

4,1

19,1

93

$

3

67,8

37

$

3

50,3

19

$

38

,171

,175

$

(

17,5

81,7

30)

$

20

,589

,445

$

13,7

26,2

97

2420

41 $

33,

667,

164

$

4,1

19,1

93

$

3

67,8

37

$

3

50,3

19

$

38

,504

,513

$

(

17,9

33,3

64)

$

20

,571

,149

$

13,7

14,0

99

2520

42 $

34,

003,

836

$

4,2

01,5

76

$

3

75,1

93

$

3

57,3

26

$

38

,937

,932

$

(

18,2

92,0

31)

$

20

,645

,900

$

13,7

63,9

33

2620

43 $

34,

343,

874

$

4,2

01,5

76

$

3

75,1

93

$

3

57,3

26

$

39

,277

,970

$

(

18,6

57,8

72)

$

20

,620

,098

$

13,7

46,7

32

2720

44 $

34,

687,

313

$

34

,687

,313

$

(

19,0

31,0

30)

$

15

,656

,284

$

10,4

37,5

22

2820

45 $

35,

034,

186

$

35

,034

,186

$

(

19,4

11,6

50)

$

15

,622

,536

$

10,4

15,0

24

2920

46 $

35,

384,

528

$

35

,384

,528

$

(

19,7

99,8

83)

$

15

,584

,645

$

10,3

89,7

63

3020

47 $

35,

738,

373

$

35

,738

,373

$

(

20,1

95,8

81)

$

15

,542

,493

$

10,3

61,6

62

$

931

,005

,129

$

105,

632,

147

$

9

3,95

6,44

7 $

8

,390

,147

$

7

,990

,583

$

3

,803

,722

$

1,1

55,5

53,9

26

$

(

453,

078,

317)

$

702

,475

,609

$

4

68,3

17,0

73

COVE

RAGE

@1.

5

1%an

nual

ly

2%bi

annu

ally

2%an

nual

ly

YEAR

PRO

PERT

Y AS

SESS

MEN

T 1/

3 M

ILE

(REC

EIVE

D JA

NU

ARY

OF

YEAR

INDI

CATE

D)

O&

M C

OST

S

REVE

NU

E FO

R DE

BT

SERV

ICE

AFTE

R CO

VERA

GE

INFL

ATIO

N R

ATES

SALE

S TA

X*D

SRF

appl

ied

to fi

nal b

ond

paym

ent

PRO

PERT

Y AS

SESS

MEN

T

SALE

S TA

XTO

TAL

REVE

NU

ESO

&M

CO

STS

TOTA

L

463

2414

7.1

3/

24/2

014

463

2414

7.3

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

535

appendix 5: CONCePtual StReetCaR

aliGNMeNtS

536

independence avenue COSt eStiMate aND CONCePtual DRaWiNGS

3/24

/201

4Ka

nsas

City

Nex

tRai

l Stu

dy: O

rder

of M

agni

tude

Cos

t Bac

k-U

p5

of 6

Stre

etca

r Lin

eIn

depe

nden

ce (G

rand

to B

ento

n)Cu

rren

t Yea

r20

19In

flatio

n Ra

teAp

prox

imat

ely

$28

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(Cur

rent

Yea

r)20

14 (Y

R)(Y

R)3.

00%

SCC

SCC

Sub

Item

#Ite

m D

escr

iptio

nIte

m C

ost

Item

Con

t.Su

btot

alYo

ESu

btot

al Y

oE10

GU

IDEW

AY &

TRA

CK E

LEM

ENTS

(Tra

ck M

iles)

$14,

242,

045

$2,9

45,9

09$1

7,18

7,95

5$1

9,92

5,55

010

.02

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de s

emi-e

xclu

sive

(allo

ws

cros

s-tra

ffic)

$0$0

$020

19$0

10.0

3G

uide

way

: At-g

rade

in m

ixed

traf

fic$1

3,26

7,04

5$2

,653

,409

$15,

920,

455

2019

$18,

456,

170

10.1

2Tr

ack:

Spe

cial

(sw

itche

s, tu

rnou

ts)

$975

,000

$292

,500

$1,2

67,5

0020

19$1

,469

,380

20ST

ATIO

NS,

STO

PS, T

ERM

INAL

S, IN

TERM

ODA

L (n

umbe

r)$1

,600

,000

$480

,000

$2,0

80,0

00$2

,411

,290

20.0

1A

t-gra

de s

tatio

n, s

top,

she

lter,

mal

l, te

rmin

al, p

latfo

rm$1

,600

,000

$480

,000

$2,0

80,0

0020

19$2

,411

,290

30SU

PPO

RT F

ACIL

ITIE

S: Y

ARDS

, SHO

PS, A

DMIN

. BLD

GS

$3,3

16,7

61$6

63,3

52$3

,980

,114

$4,6

14,0

4330

.02

Ligh

t Mai

nten

ance

Fac

ility

$3

,316

,761

$663

,352

$3,9

80,1

1420

19$4

,614

,043

40SI

TEW

ORK

& S

PECI

AL C

ON

DITI

ON

S$2

0,64

7,53

5$2

,336

,470

$22,

984,

005

$26,

644,

761

40.0

2S

ite U

tiliti

es, U

tility

Rel

ocat

ion

$4,8

40,0

00$1

,452

,000

$6,2

92,0

0020

19$7

,294

,152

40.0

7A

utom

obile

, bus

, van

acc

essw

ays

incl

udin

g ro

ads,

par

king

lots

$4,4

22,3

48$8

84,4

70$5

,306

,818

2019

$6,1

52,0

5740

.08

Tem

pora

ry F

acili

ties

and

othe

r ind

irect

cos

ts d

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n$1

1,38

5,18

6$0

$11,

385,

186

2019

$13,

198,

551

50SY

STEM

S$1

8,23

5,45

5$3

,843

,591

$22,

079,

045

$25,

595,

665

50.0

2Tr

affic

sig

nals

and

cro

ssin

g pr

otec

tion

$1,9

65,0

00$5

89,5

00$2

,554

,500

2019

$2,9

61,3

6650

.03

Trac

tion

pow

er s

uppl

y: s

ubst

atio

ns

$6,6

33,5

23$1

,326

,705

$7,9

60,2

2720

19$9

,228

,085

50.0

4Tr

actio

n po

wer

dis

tribu

tion:

cat

enar

y an

d th

ird ra

il$9

,286

,932

$1,8

57,3

86$1

1,14

4,31

820

19$1

2,91

9,31

950

.06

Fare

col

lect

ion

syst

em a

nd e

quip

men

t$3

50,0

00$7

0,00

0$4

20,0

0020

19$4

86,8

9560

ROW

, LAN

D, E

XIST

ING

IMPR

OVE

MEN

TS$6

63,3

52$1

99,0

06$8

62,3

58$9

99,7

0960

.01

Pur

chas

e or

leas

e of

real

est

ate

$6

63,3

52$1

99,0

06$8

62,3

5820

19$9

99,7

0970

VEHI

CLES

(num

ber)

$21,

006,

155

$1,0

50,3

08$2

2,05

6,46

3$2

5,56

9,48

670

.01

Ligh

t Rai

l$2

1,00

6,15

5$1

,050

,308

$22,

056,

463

2019

$25,

569,

486

80PR

OFE

SSIO

NAL

SER

VICE

S (a

pplie

s to

Cats

. 10-

50)

$20,

493,

335

$0$2

0,49

3,33

5$2

3,75

7,39

280

.01

Pre

limin

ary

Eng

inee

ring

$2,0

49,3

34$0

$2,0

49,3

3420

19$2

,375

,739

80.0

2Fi

nal D

esig

n$5

,464

,889

$0$5

,464

,889

2019

$6,3

35,3

0580

.03

Pro

ject

Man

agem

ent f

or D

esig

n an

d C

onst

ruct

ion

$4,0

98,6

67$0

$4,0

98,6

6720

19$4

,751

,478

80.0

4C

onst

ruct

ion

Adm

inis

tratio

n &

Man

agem

ent

$4,0

98,6

67$0

$4,0

98,6

6720

19$4

,751

,478

80.0

5P

rofe

ssio

nal L

iabi

lity

and

othe

r Non

-Con

stru

ctio

n In

sura

nce

$683

,111

$0$6

83,1

1120

19$7

91,9

1380

.06

Lega

l; P

erm

its; R

evie

w F

ees

by o

ther

age

ncie

s, c

ities

, etc

.$1

,366

,222

$0$1

,366

,222

2019

$1,5

83,8

2680

.07

Sur

veys

, Tes

ting,

Inve

stig

atio

n, In

spec

tion

$1,3

66,2

22$0

$1,3

66,2

2220

19$1

,583

,826

80.0

8S

tart

up$1

,366

,222

$0$1

,366

,222

2019

$1,5

83,8

2690

UN

ALLO

CATE

D CO

NTI

NG

ENCY

$11,

172,

327

$12,

951,

790

100

FIN

ANCE

CHA

RGES

Curr

ent Y

ear T

otal

YoE

Tota

lSe

gmen

t Tot

als

(10-

100)

$122

,895

,602

$142

,469

,685

4.4

Trac

k M

ile(s

)Ap

prox

imat

ely

$32

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(YoE

)

Estim

ate

Deve

lope

d by

: RPB

Prep

ared

by

HDR

Engi

neer

ing,

Inc.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

537

3/24

/201

4Ka

nsas

City

Nex

tRai

l Stu

dy: O

rder

of M

agni

tude

Cos

t Bac

k-U

p6

of 6

Stre

etca

r Lin

eIn

depe

nden

ce (G

rand

to T

oppi

ng)

Curr

ent Y

ear

2019

Infla

tion

Rate

Appr

oxim

atel

y $2

7 M

illio

n Pe

r Tra

ck M

ile (C

urre

nt Y

ear)

2014

(YR)

(YR)

3.00

%SC

CSC

C Su

bIte

m #

Item

Des

crip

tion

Item

Cos

tIte

m C

ont.

Subt

otal

YoE

Subt

otal

YoE

10GU

IDEW

AY &

TRA

CK E

LEM

ENTS

(Tra

ck M

iles)

$24,

467,

045

$5,0

13,4

09$2

9,48

0,45

5$3

4,17

5,92

710

.02

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de s

emi-e

xclu

sive

(allo

ws

cros

s-tra

ffic)

$0$0

$020

19$0

10.0

3G

uide

way

: At-g

rade

in m

ixed

traf

fic$2

3,26

7,04

5$4

,653

,409

$27,

920,

455

2019

$32,

367,

459

10.1

2Tr

ack:

Spe

cial

(sw

itche

s, tu

rnou

ts)

$1,2

00,0

00$3

60,0

00$1

,560

,000

2019

$1,8

08,4

6820

STAT

ION

S, S

TOPS

, TER

MIN

ALS,

INTE

RMO

DAL

(num

ber)

$2,7

00,0

00$8

10,0

00$3

,510

,000

$4,0

69,0

5220

.01

At-g

rade

sta

tion,

sto

p, s

helte

r, m

all,

term

inal

, pla

tform

$2,7

00,0

00$8

10,0

00$3

,510

,000

2019

$4,0

69,0

5230

SUPP

ORT

FAC

ILIT

IES:

YAR

DS, S

HOPS

, ADM

IN. B

LDGS

$5,8

16,7

61$1

,163

,352

$6,9

80,1

14$8

,091

,865

30.0

2Li

ght M

aint

enan

ce F

acilit

y $5

,816

,761

$1,1

63,3

52$6

,980

,114

2019

$8,0

91,8

6540

SITE

WO

RK &

SPE

CIAL

CO

NDI

TIO

NS

$36,

029,

818

$4,1

25,1

36$4

0,15

4,95

5$4

6,55

0,59

840

.02

Site

Util

ities

, Util

ity R

eloc

atio

n$8

,580

,000

$2,5

74,0

00$1

1,15

4,00

020

19$1

2,93

0,54

340

.07

Aut

omob

ile, b

us, v

an a

cces

sway

s in

clud

ing

road

s, p

arki

ng lo

ts$7

,755

,682

$1,5

51,1

36$9

,306

,818

2019

$10,

789,

153

40.0

8Te

mpo

rary

Fac

ilitie

s an

d ot

her i

ndire

ct c

osts

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

$19,

694,

136

$0$1

9,69

4,13

620

19$2

2,83

0,90

250

SYST

EMS

$31,

452,

955

$6,5

86,3

41$3

8,03

9,29

5$4

4,09

7,96

950

.02

Traf

fic s

igna

ls a

nd c

ross

ing

prot

ectio

n$2

,957

,500

$887

,250

$3,8

44,7

5020

19$4

,457

,119

50.0

3Tr

actio

n po

wer

sup

ply:

sub

stat

ions

$1

1,63

3,52

3$2

,326

,705

$13,

960,

227

2019

$16,

183,

730

50.0

4Tr

actio

n po

wer

dis

tribu

tion:

cat

enar

y an

d th

ird ra

il$1

6,28

6,93

2$3

,257

,386

$19,

544,

318

2019

$22,

657,

221

50.0

6Fa

re c

olle

ctio

n sy

stem

and

equ

ipm

ent

$575

,000

$115

,000

$690

,000

2019

$799

,899

60RO

W, L

AND,

EXI

STIN

G IM

PRO

VEM

ENTS

$1,1

63,3

52$3

49,0

06$1

,512

,358

$1,7

53,2

3760

.01

Pur

chas

e or

leas

e of

real

est

ate

$1

,163

,352

$349

,006

$1,5

12,3

5820

19$1

,753

,237

70VE

HICL

ES (n

umbe

r)$3

6,83

9,48

9$1

,841

,974

$38,

681,

463

$44,

842,

417

70.0

1Li

ght R

ail

$36,

839,

489

$1,8

41,9

74$3

8,68

1,46

320

19$4

4,84

2,41

780

PRO

FESS

ION

AL S

ERVI

CES

(app

lies t

o Ca

ts. 1

0-50

)$3

5,44

9,44

5$0

$35,

449,

445

$41,

095,

623

80.0

1P

relim

inar

y E

ngin

eerin

g$3

,544

,945

$0$3

,544

,945

2019

$4,1

09,5

6280

.02

Fina

l Des

ign

$9,4

53,1

85$0

$9,4

53,1

8520

19$1

0,95

8,83

380

.03

Pro

ject

Man

agem

ent f

or D

esig

n an

d C

onst

ruct

ion

$7,0

89,8

89$0

$7,0

89,8

8920

19$8

,219

,125

80.0

4C

onst

ruct

ion

Adm

inis

tratio

n &

Man

agem

ent

$7,0

89,8

89$0

$7,0

89,8

8920

19$8

,219

,125

80.0

5P

rofe

ssio

nal L

iabi

lity

and

othe

r Non

-Con

stru

ctio

n In

sura

nce

$1,1

81,6

48$0

$1,1

81,6

4820

19$1

,369

,854

80.0

6Le

gal;

Per

mits

; Rev

iew

Fee

s by

oth

er a

genc

ies,

citi

es, e

tc.

$2,3

63,2

96$0

$2,3

63,2

9620

19$2

,739

,708

80.0

7S

urve

ys, T

estin

g, In

vest

igat

ion,

Insp

ectio

n$2

,363

,296

$0$2

,363

,296

2019

$2,7

39,7

0880

.08

Sta

rt up

$2,3

63,2

96$0

$2,3

63,2

9620

19$2

,739

,708

90U

NAL

LOCA

TED

CON

TIN

GEN

CY$1

9,38

0,80

8$2

2,46

7,66

910

0FI

NAN

CE C

HARG

ESCu

rren

t Yea

r Tot

alYo

E To

tal

Segm

ent T

otal

s (1

0-10

0)$2

13,1

88,8

93$2

47,1

44,3

57

7.8

Trac

k M

ile(s

)Ap

prox

imat

ely

$32

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(YoE

)

Estim

ate

Deve

lope

d by

: RPB

Prep

ared

by

HDR

Engi

neer

ing,

Inc.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

539

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

541

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

543

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

545

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

547

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

549

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

551

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

553

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

555

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

557

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

559

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

561

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

563

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

565

566

linwood Boulevard COSt eStiMate aND CONCePtual DRaWiNGS

3/24

/201

4Ka

nsas

City

Nex

tRai

l Stu

dy: O

rder

of M

agni

tude

Cos

t Bac

k-U

p3

of 6

Stre

etca

r Lin

eLi

nwoo

d (M

ain

to P

rosp

ect)

Curr

ent Y

ear

2019

Infla

tion

Rate

Appr

oxim

atel

y $2

8 M

illio

n Pe

r Tra

ck M

ile (C

urre

nt Y

ear)

2014

(YR)

(YR)

3.00

%SC

CSC

C Su

bIte

m #

Item

Des

crip

tion

Item

Cos

tIte

m C

ont.

Subt

otal

YoE

Subt

otal

YoE

10G

UID

EWAY

& T

RACK

ELE

MEN

TS (T

rack

Mile

s)$1

2,07

0,45

5$2

,541

,591

$14,

612,

045

$16,

939,

365

10.0

2G

uide

way

: At-g

rade

sem

i-exc

lusi

ve (a

llow

s cr

oss-

traffi

c)$0

$0$0

2019

$010

.03

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de in

mix

ed tr

affic

$10,

795,

455

$2,1

59,0

91$1

2,95

4,54

520

19$1

5,01

7,86

910

.12

Trac

k: S

peci

al (s

witc

hes,

turn

outs

)$1

,275

,000

$382

,500

$1,6

57,5

0020

19$1

,921

,497

20ST

ATIO

NS,

STO

PS, T

ERM

INAL

S, IN

TERM

ODA

L (n

umbe

r)$1

,100

,000

$330

,000

$1,4

30,0

00$1

,657

,762

20.0

1A

t-gra

de s

tatio

n, s

top,

she

lter,

mal

l, te

rmin

al, p

latfo

rm$1

,100

,000

$330

,000

$1,4

30,0

0020

19$1

,657

,762

30SU

PPO

RT F

ACIL

ITIE

S: Y

ARDS

, SHO

PS, A

DMIN

. BLD

GS

$2,6

98,8

64$5

39,7

73$3

,238

,636

$3,7

54,4

6730

.02

Ligh

t Mai

nten

ance

Fac

ility

$2

,698

,864

$539

,773

$3,2

38,6

3620

19$3

,754

,467

40SI

TEW

ORK

& S

PECI

AL C

ON

DITI

ON

S$1

6,93

5,04

8$1

,907

,697

$18,

842,

745

$21,

843,

906

40.0

2S

ite U

tiliti

es, U

tility

Rel

ocat

ion

$3,9

60,0

00$1

,188

,000

$5,1

48,0

0020

19$5

,967

,943

40.0

7A

utom

obile

, bus

, van

acc

essw

ays

incl

udin

g ro

ads,

par

king

lots

$3,5

98,4

85$7

19,6

97$4

,318

,182

2019

$5,0

05,9

5640

.08

Tem

pora

ry F

acili

ties

and

othe

r ind

irect

cos

ts d

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n$9

,376

,564

$0$9

,376

,564

2019

$10,

870,

007

50SY

STEM

S$1

4,96

4,54

5$3

,171

,409

$18,

135,

955

$21,

024,

542

50.0

2Tr

affic

sig

nals

and

cro

ssin

g pr

otec

tion

$1,7

85,0

00$5

35,5

00$2

,320

,500

2019

$2,6

90,0

9550

.03

Trac

tion

pow

er s

uppl

y: s

ubst

atio

ns

$5,3

97,7

27$1

,079

,545

$6,4

77,2

7320

19$7

,508

,934

50.0

4Tr

actio

n po

wer

dis

tribu

tion:

cat

enar

y an

d th

ird ra

il$7

,556

,818

$1,5

11,3

64$9

,068

,182

2019

$10,

512,

508

50.0

6Fa

re c

olle

ctio

n sy

stem

and

equ

ipm

ent

$225

,000

$45,

000

$270

,000

2019

$313

,004

60RO

W, L

AND,

EXI

STIN

G IM

PRO

VEM

ENTS

$539

,773

$161

,932

$701

,705

$813

,468

60.0

1P

urch

ase

or le

ase

of re

al e

stat

e

$539

,773

$161

,932

$701

,705

2019

$813

,468

70VE

HICL

ES (n

umbe

r)$1

7,09

2,80

3$8

54,6

40$1

7,94

7,44

3$2

0,80

6,00

670

.01

Ligh

t Rai

l$1

7,09

2,80

3$8

54,6

40$1

7,94

7,44

320

19$2

0,80

6,00

680

PRO

FESS

ION

AL S

ERVI

CES

(app

lies t

o Ca

ts. 1

0-50

)$1

6,87

7,81

5$0

$16,

877,

815

$19,

566,

013

80.0

1P

relim

inar

y E

ngin

eerin

g$1

,687

,781

$0$1

,687

,781

2019

$1,9

56,6

0180

.02

Fina

l Des

ign

$4,5

00,7

51$0

$4,5

00,7

5120

19$5

,217

,603

80.0

3P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t for

Des

ign

and

Con

stru

ctio

n$3

,375

,563

$0$3

,375

,563

2019

$3,9

13,2

0380

.04

Con

stru

ctio

n A

dmin

istra

tion

& M

anag

emen

t $3

,375

,563

$0$3

,375

,563

2019

$3,9

13,2

0380

.05

Pro

fess

iona

l Lia

bilit

y an

d ot

her N

on-C

onst

ruct

ion

Insu

ranc

e $5

62,5

94$0

$562

,594

2019

$652

,200

80.0

6Le

gal;

Per

mits

; Rev

iew

Fee

s by

oth

er a

genc

ies,

citi

es, e

tc.

$1,1

25,1

88$0

$1,1

25,1

8820

19$1

,304

,401

80.0

7S

urve

ys, T

estin

g, In

vest

igat

ion,

Insp

ectio

n$1

,125

,188

$0$1

,125

,188

2019

$1,3

04,4

0180

.08

Sta

rt up

$1,1

25,1

88$0

$1,1

25,1

8820

19$1

,304

,401

90U

NAL

LOCA

TED

CON

TIN

GEN

CY$9

,178

,634

$10,

640,

553

100

FIN

ANCE

CHA

RGES

Curr

ent Y

ear T

otal

YoE

Tota

lSe

gmen

t Tot

als

(10-

100)

$100

,964

,979

$117

,046

,082

3.6

Trac

k M

ile(s

)Ap

prox

imat

ely

$33

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(YoE

)

Estim

ate

Deve

lope

d by

: RPB

Prep

ared

by

HDR

Engi

neer

ing,

Inc.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

567

3/24

/201

4Ka

nsas

City

Nex

tRai

l Stu

dy: O

rder

of M

agni

tude

Cos

t Bac

k-U

p4

of 6

Stre

etca

r Lin

eLi

nwoo

d (M

ain

to V

an B

runt

)Cu

rren

t Yea

r20

19In

flatio

n Ra

teAp

prox

imat

ely

$27

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(Cur

rent

Yea

r)20

14 (Y

R)(Y

R)3.

00%

SCC

SCC

Sub

Item

#Ite

m D

escr

iptio

nIte

m C

ost

Item

Con

t.Su

btot

alYo

ESu

btot

al Y

oE10

GU

IDEW

AY &

TRA

CK E

LEM

ENTS

(Tra

ck M

iles)

$21,

161,

364

$4,3

59,7

73$2

5,52

1,13

6$2

9,58

5,99

210

.02

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de s

emi-e

xclu

sive

(allo

ws

cros

s-tra

ffic)

$0$0

$020

19$0

10.0

3G

uide

way

: At-g

rade

in m

ixed

traf

fic$1

9,88

6,36

4$3

,977

,273

$23,

863,

636

2019

$27,

664,

495

10.1

2Tr

ack:

Spe

cial

(sw

itche

s, tu

rnou

ts)

$1,2

75,0

00$3

82,5

00$1

,657

,500

2019

$1,9

21,4

9720

STAT

ION

S, S

TOPS

, TER

MIN

ALS,

INTE

RMO

DAL

(num

ber)

$1,9

00,0

00$5

70,0

00$2

,470

,000

$2,8

63,4

0720

.01

At-g

rade

sta

tion,

sto

p, s

helte

r, m

all,

term

inal

, pla

tform

$1,9

00,0

00$5

70,0

00$2

,470

,000

2019

$2,8

63,4

0730

SUPP

ORT

FAC

ILIT

IES:

YAR

DS, S

HOPS

, ADM

IN. B

LDG

S$4

,971

,591

$994

,318

$5,9

65,9

09$6

,916

,124

30.0

2Li

ght M

aint

enan

ce F

acili

ty

$4,9

71,5

91$9

94,3

18$5

,965

,909

2019

$6,9

16,1

2440

SITE

WO

RK &

SPE

CIAL

CO

NDI

TIO

NS

$30,

725,

429

$3,5

03,7

58$3

4,22

9,18

6$3

9,68

1,00

840

.02

Site

Util

ities

, Util

ity R

eloc

atio

n$7

,260

,000

$2,1

78,0

00$9

,438

,000

2019

$10,

941,

229

40.0

7A

utom

obile

, bus

, van

acc

essw

ays

incl

udin

g ro

ads,

par

king

lots

$6,6

28,7

88$1

,325

,758

$7,9

54,5

4520

19$9

,221

,498

40.0

8Te

mpo

rary

Fac

ilitie

s an

d ot

her i

ndire

ct c

osts

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

$16,

836,

641

$0$1

6,83

6,64

120

19$1

9,51

8,28

150

SYST

EMS

$27,

121,

136

$5,7

12,4

77$3

2,83

3,61

4$3

8,06

3,15

750

.02

Traf

fic s

igna

ls a

nd c

ross

ing

prot

ectio

n$2

,882

,500

$864

,750

$3,7

47,2

5020

19$4

,344

,090

50.0

3Tr

actio

n po

wer

sup

ply:

sub

stat

ions

$9

,943

,182

$1,9

88,6

36$1

1,93

1,81

820

19$1

3,83

2,24

750

.04

Trac

tion

pow

er d

istri

butio

n: c

aten

ary

and

third

rail

$13,

920,

455

$2,7

84,0

91$1

6,70

4,54

520

19$1

9,36

5,14

650

.06

Fare

col

lect

ion

syst

em a

nd e

quip

men

t$3

75,0

00$7

5,00

0$4

50,0

0020

19$5

21,6

7360

ROW

, LAN

D, E

XIST

ING

IMPR

OVE

MEN

TS$9

94,3

18$2

98,2

95$1

,292

,614

$1,4

98,4

9360

.01

Pur

chas

e or

leas

e of

real

est

ate

$9

94,3

18$2

98,2

95$1

,292

,614

2019

$1,4

98,4

9370

VEHI

CLES

(num

ber)

$31,

486,

742

$1,5

74,3

37$3

3,06

1,08

0$3

8,32

6,85

270

.01

Ligh

t Rai

l$3

1,48

6,74

2$1

,574

,337

$33,

061,

080

2019

$38,

326,

852

80PR

OFE

SSIO

NAL

SER

VICE

S (a

pplie

s to

Cats

. 10-

50)

$30,

305,

954

$0$3

0,30

5,95

4$3

5,13

2,90

680

.01

Pre

limin

ary

Eng

inee

ring

$3,0

30,5

95$0

$3,0

30,5

9520

19$3

,513

,291

80.0

2Fi

nal D

esig

n$8

,081

,588

$0$8

,081

,588

2019

$9,3

68,7

7580

.03

Pro

ject

Man

agem

ent f

or D

esig

n an

d C

onst

ruct

ion

$6,0

61,1

91$0

$6,0

61,1

9120

19$7

,026

,581

80.0

4C

onst

ruct

ion

Adm

inis

tratio

n &

Man

agem

ent

$6,0

61,1

91$0

$6,0

61,1

9120

19$7

,026

,581

80.0

5P

rofe

ssio

nal L

iabi

lity

and

othe

r Non

-Con

stru

ctio

n In

sura

nce

$1,0

10,1

98$0

$1,0

10,1

9820

19$1

,171

,097

80.0

6Le

gal;

Per

mits

; Rev

iew

Fee

s by

oth

er a

genc

ies,

citi

es, e

tc.

$2,0

20,3

97$0

$2,0

20,3

9720

19$2

,342

,194

80.0

7S

urve

ys, T

estin

g, In

vest

igat

ion,

Insp

ectio

n$2

,020

,397

$0$2

,020

,397

2019

$2,3

42,1

9480

.08

Sta

rt up

$2,0

20,3

97$0

$2,0

20,3

9720

19$2

,342

,194

90U

NAL

LOCA

TED

CON

TIN

GEN

CY$1

6,56

7,94

9$1

9,20

6,79

410

0FI

NAN

CE C

HARG

ESCu

rren

t Yea

r Tot

alYo

E To

tal

Segm

ent T

otal

s (1

0-10

0)$1

82,2

47,4

42$2

11,2

74,7

34

6.6

Trac

k M

ile(s

)Ap

prox

imat

ely

$32

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(YoE

)

Estim

ate

Deve

lope

d by

: RPB

Prep

ared

by

HDR

Engi

neer

ing,

Inc.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

569

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

571

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

573

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

575

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

577

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

579

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

581

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

583

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

585

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

587

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

589

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

591

592

Main Street Plus COSt eStiMate aND CONCePtual DRaWiNGS

3/24

/201

4Ka

nsas

City

Nex

tRai

l Stu

dy: O

rder

of M

agni

tude

Cos

t Bac

k-U

p1

of 6

Stre

etca

r Lin

eM

ain

St P

lus (

Pers

hing

to U

MKC

)Cu

rren

t Yea

r20

19In

flatio

n Ra

teAp

prox

imat

ely

$28

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(Cur

rent

Yea

r)20

14 (Y

R)(Y

R)3.

00%

SCC

SCC

Sub

Item

#Ite

m D

escr

iptio

nIte

m C

ost

Item

Con

t.Su

btot

alYo

ESu

btot

al Y

oE10

GU

IDEW

AY &

TRA

CK E

LEM

ENTS

(Tra

ck M

iles)

$20,

228,

409

$4,0

90,6

82$2

4,31

9,09

1$2

8,19

2,49

210

.02

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de s

emi-e

xclu

sive

(allo

ws

cros

s-tra

ffic)

$1,9

09,0

91$3

81,8

18$2

,290

,909

2019

$2,6

55,7

9210

.03

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de in

mix

ed tr

affic

$17,

869,

318

$3,5

73,8

64$2

1,44

3,18

220

19$2

4,85

8,52

510

.12

Trac

k: S

peci

al (s

witc

hes,

turn

outs

)$4

50,0

00$1

35,0

00$5

85,0

0020

19$6

78,1

7520

STAT

ION

S, S

TOPS

, TER

MIN

ALS,

INTE

RMO

DAL

(num

ber)

$1,9

00,0

00$5

70,0

00$2

,470

,000

$2,8

63,4

0720

.01

At-g

rade

sta

tion,

sto

p, s

helte

r, m

all,

term

inal

, pla

tform

$1,9

00,0

00$5

70,0

00$2

,470

,000

2019

$2,8

63,4

0730

SUPP

ORT

FAC

ILIT

IES:

YAR

DS, S

HOPS

, ADM

IN. B

LDG

S$4

,914

,773

$982

,955

$5,8

97,7

27$6

,837

,082

30.0

2Li

ght M

aint

enan

ce F

acili

ty

$4,9

14,7

73$9

82,9

55$5

,897

,727

2019

$6,8

37,0

8240

SITE

WO

RK &

SPE

CIAL

CO

NDI

TIO

NS

$32,

168,

459

$3,8

28,6

06$3

5,99

7,06

5$4

1,73

0,46

440

.02

Site

Util

ities

, Util

ity R

eloc

atio

n$7

,833

,333

$2,3

50,0

00$1

0,18

3,33

320

19$1

1,80

5,27

440

.07

Aut

omob

ile, b

us, v

an a

cces

sway

s in

clud

ing

road

s, p

arki

ng lo

ts$7

,333

,030

$1,4

78,6

06$8

,811

,636

2019

$10,

215,

102

40.0

8Te

mpo

rary

Fac

ilitie

s an

d ot

her i

ndire

ct c

osts

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

$17,

002,

095

$0$1

7,00

2,09

520

19$1

9,71

0,08

850

SYST

EMS

$27,

480,

985

$5,8

47,7

05$3

3,32

8,68

9$3

8,63

7,08

650

.02

Traf

fic s

igna

ls a

nd c

ross

ing

prot

ectio

n$3

,515

,076

$1,0

54,5

23$4

,569

,598

2019

$5,2

97,4

1750

.03

Trac

tion

pow

er s

uppl

y: s

ubst

atio

ns

$9,8

29,5

45$1

,965

,909

$11,

795,

455

2019

$13,

674,

165

50.0

4Tr

actio

n po

wer

dis

tribu

tion:

cat

enar

y an

d th

ird ra

il$1

3,76

1,36

4$2

,752

,273

$16,

513,

636

2019

$19,

143,

831

50.0

6Fa

re c

olle

ctio

n sy

stem

and

equ

ipm

ent

$375

,000

$75,

000

$450

,000

2019

$521

,673

60RO

W, L

AND,

EXI

STIN

G IM

PRO

VEM

ENTS

$982

,955

$294

,886

$1,2

77,8

41$1

,481

,368

60.0

1P

urch

ase

or le

ase

of re

al e

stat

e

$982

,955

$294

,886

$1,2

77,8

4120

19$1

,481

,368

70VE

HICL

ES (n

umbe

r)$3

1,12

6,89

4$1

,556

,345

$32,

683,

239

$37,

888,

831

70.0

1Li

ght R

ail

$31,

126,

894

$1,5

56,3

45$3

2,68

3,23

920

19$3

7,88

8,83

180

PRO

FESS

ION

AL S

ERVI

CES

(app

lies t

o Ca

ts. 1

0-50

)$3

0,60

3,77

2$0

$30,

603,

772

$35,

478,

159

80.0

1P

relim

inar

y E

ngin

eerin

g$3

,060

,377

$0$3

,060

,377

2019

$3,5

47,8

1680

.02

Fina

l Des

ign

$8,1

61,0

06$0

$8,1

61,0

0620

19$9

,460

,842

80.0

3P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t for

Des

ign

and

Con

stru

ctio

n$6

,120

,754

$0$6

,120

,754

2019

$7,0

95,6

3280

.04

Con

stru

ctio

n A

dmin

istra

tion

& M

anag

emen

t $6

,120

,754

$0$6

,120

,754

2019

$7,0

95,6

3280

.05

Pro

fess

iona

l Lia

bilit

y an

d ot

her N

on-C

onst

ruct

ion

Insu

ranc

e $1

,020

,126

$0$1

,020

,126

2019

$1,1

82,6

0580

.06

Lega

l; P

erm

its; R

evie

w F

ees

by o

ther

age

ncie

s, c

ities

, etc

.$2

,040

,251

$0$2

,040

,251

2019

$2,3

65,2

1180

.07

Sur

veys

, Tes

ting,

Inve

stig

atio

n, In

spec

tion

$2,0

40,2

51$0

$2,0

40,2

5120

19$2

,365

,211

80.0

8S

tart

up$2

,040

,251

$0$2

,040

,251

2019

$2,3

65,2

1190

UN

ALLO

CATE

D CO

NTI

NG

ENCY

$16,

657,

742

$19,

310,

889

100

FIN

ANCE

CHA

RGES

Curr

ent Y

ear T

otal

YoE

Tota

lSe

gmen

t Tot

als

(10-

100)

$183

,235

,167

$212

,419

,778

6.6

Trac

k M

ile(s

)Ap

prox

imat

ely

$32

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(YoE

)

Estim

ate

Deve

lope

d by

: RPB

Prep

ared

by

HDR

Engi

neer

ing,

Inc.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

593

3/24

/201

4Ka

nsas

City

Nex

tRai

l Stu

dy: O

rder

of M

agni

tude

Cos

t Bac

k-U

p2

of 6

Stre

etca

r Lin

eM

ain

St P

lus (

Pers

hing

to S

outh

of 7

5th)

Curr

ent Y

ear

2019

Infla

tion

Rate

Appr

oxim

atel

y $2

9 M

illio

n Pe

r Tra

ck M

ile (C

urre

nt Y

ear)

2014

(YR)

(YR)

3.00

%SC

CSC

C Su

bIte

m #

Item

Des

crip

tion

Item

Cos

tIte

m C

ont.

Subt

otal

YoE

Subt

otal

YoE

10G

UID

EWAY

& T

RACK

ELE

MEN

TS (T

rack

Mile

s)$3

6,31

4,01

5$7

,397

,803

$43,

711,

818

$50,

673,

978

10.0

2G

uide

way

: At-g

rade

sem

i-exc

lusi

ve (a

llow

s cr

oss-

traffi

c)$8

,515

,152

$1,7

03,0

30$1

0,21

8,18

220

19$1

1,84

5,67

310

.03

Gui

dew

ay: A

t-gra

de in

mix

ed tr

affic

$26,

448,

864

$5,2

89,7

73$3

1,73

8,63

620

19$3

6,79

3,77

810

.12

Trac

k: S

peci

al (s

witc

hes,

turn

outs

)$1

,350

,000

$405

,000

$1,7

55,0

0020

19$2

,034

,526

20ST

ATIO

NS,

STO

PS, T

ERM

INAL

S, IN

TERM

ODA

L (n

umbe

r)$3

,200

,000

$960

,000

$4,1

60,0

00$4

,822

,580

20.0

1A

t-gra

de s

tatio

n, s

top,

she

lter,

mal

l, te

rmin

al, p

latfo

rm$3

,200

,000

$960

,000

$4,1

60,0

0020

19$4

,822

,580

30SU

PPO

RT F

ACIL

ITIE

S: Y

ARDS

, SHO

PS, A

DMIN

. BLD

GS

$8,6

07,9

55$1

,721

,591

$10,

329,

545

$11,

974,

774

30.0

2Li

ght M

aint

enan

ce F

acili

ty

$8,6

07,9

55$1

,721

,591

$10,

329,

545

2019

$11,

974,

774

40SI

TEW

ORK

& S

PECI

AL C

ON

DITI

ON

S$6

2,87

9,03

0$7

,834

,455

$70,

713,

484

$81,

976,

309

40.0

2S

ite U

tiliti

es, U

tility

Rel

ocat

ion

$14,

958,

333

$4,4

87,5

00$1

9,44

5,83

320

19$2

2,54

3,05

040

.07

Aut

omob

ile, b

us, v

an a

cces

sway

s in

clud

ing

road

s, p

arki

ng lo

ts$1

6,53

9,77

3$3

,346

,955

$19,

886,

727

2019

$23,

054,

167

40.0

8Te

mpo

rary

Fac

ilitie

s an

d ot

her i

ndire

ct c

osts

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

$31,

380,

924

$0$3

1,38

0,92

420

19$3

6,37

9,09

150

SYST

EMS

$48,

898,

087

$10,

472,

608

$59,

370,

695

$68,

826,

908

50.0

2Tr

affic

sig

nals

and

cro

ssin

g pr

otec

tion

$6,9

29,9

05$2

,078

,972

$9,0

08,8

7720

19$1

0,44

3,75

750

.03

Trac

tion

pow

er s

uppl

y: s

ubst

atio

ns

$17,

215,

909

$3,4

43,1

82$2

0,65

9,09

120

19$2

3,94

9,54

850

.04

Trac

tion

pow

er d

istri

butio

n: c

aten

ary

and

third

rail

$24,

102,

273

$4,8

20,4

55$2

8,92

2,72

720

19$3

3,52

9,36

850

.06

Fare

col

lect

ion

syst

em a

nd e

quip

men

t$6

50,0

00$1

30,0

00$7

80,0

0020

19$9

04,2

3460

ROW

, LAN

D, E

XIST

ING

IMPR

OVE

MEN

TS$1

,721

,591

$516

,477

$2,2

38,0

68$2

,594

,534

60.0

1P

urch

ase

or le

ase

of re

al e

stat

e

$1,7

21,5

91$5

16,4

77$2

,238

,068

2019

$2,5

94,5

3470

VEHI

CLES

(num

ber)

$54,

517,

045

$2,7

25,8

52$5

7,24

2,89

8$6

6,36

0,20

770

.01

Ligh

t Rai

l$5

4,51

7,04

5$2

,725

,852

$57,

242,

898

2019

$66,

360,

207

80PR

OFE

SSIO

NAL

SER

VICE

S (a

pplie

s to

Cats

. 10-

50)

$56,

485,

663

$0$5

6,48

5,66

3$6

5,48

2,36

580

.01

Pre

limin

ary

Eng

inee

ring

$5,6

48,5

66$0

$5,6

48,5

6620

19$6

,548

,236

80.0

2Fi

nal D

esig

n$1

5,06

2,84

3$0

$15,

062,

843

2019

$17,

461,

964

80.0

3P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t for

Des

ign

and

Con

stru

ctio

n$1

1,29

7,13

3$0

$11,

297,

133

2019

$13,

096,

473

80.0

4C

onst

ruct

ion

Adm

inis

tratio

n &

Man

agem

ent

$11,

297,

133

$0$1

1,29

7,13

320

19$1

3,09

6,47

380

.05

Pro

fess

iona

l Lia

bilit

y an

d ot

her N

on-C

onst

ruct

ion

Insu

ranc

e $1

,882

,855

$0$1

,882

,855

2019

$2,1

82,7

4580

.06

Lega

l; P

erm

its; R

evie

w F

ees

by o

ther

age

ncie

s, c

ities

, etc

.$3

,765

,711

$0$3

,765

,711

2019

$4,3

65,4

9180

.07

Sur

veys

, Tes

ting,

Inve

stig

atio

n, In

spec

tion

$3,7

65,7

11$0

$3,7

65,7

1120

19$4

,365

,491

80.0

8S

tart

up$3

,765

,711

$0$3

,765

,711

2019

$4,3

65,4

9190

UN

ALLO

CATE

D CO

NTI

NG

ENCY

$30,

425,

217

$35,

271,

166

100

FIN

ANCE

CHA

RGES

Curr

ent Y

ear T

otal

YoE

Tota

lSe

gmen

t Tot

als

(10-

100)

$334

,677

,389

$387

,982

,821

11.5

Tra

ck M

ile(s

)Ap

prox

imat

ely

$34

Mill

ion

Per T

rack

Mile

(YoE

)

Estim

ate

Deve

lope

d by

: RPB

Prep

ared

by

HDR

Engi

neer

ing,

Inc.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

595

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

597

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

599

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

601

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

603

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

605

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

607

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

609

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

611

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

613

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

615

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

617

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

619

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

621

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

623

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

625

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

627

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

629

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

631

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

633

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

635

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

637

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

639

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

641

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

643

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

645

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

647

appendix 6: ViSual iNVeNtORy

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

649

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

651

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

653

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

655

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

657

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

659

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

661

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

663

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

665

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

667

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

669

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

671

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

673

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

675

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

677

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

679

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

681

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

683

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

685

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

687

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

689

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

691

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

693

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

695

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

697

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

699

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

701

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

703

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

705

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

707

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

709

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

711

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

713

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

715

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

717

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

719

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

721

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

723

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

725

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

727

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

729

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

731

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

733

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

735

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

737

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

739

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

741

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

743

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

745

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

747

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

749

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

751

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

753

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

755

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

757

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

759

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

761

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

763

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

765

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

767

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

769

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

771

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

773

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

775

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

777

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

779

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

781

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

783

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

785

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

787

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

789

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

791

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

793

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

795

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

797

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

799

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

801

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

803

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

805

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

807

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

809

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

811

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

813

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

815

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

817

appendix 7: GlOSSaRy the following terms and acronyms are used throughout this document. the project team has developed a list of definitions for these terms and acronyms in order to ensure clearest interpretation of the nextrail plan.

ace: advanced conceptual engineering; the phase of the streetcar expansion project that follows this initial planning effortada: americans with Disabilities actalight: When a transit rider exits the vehicle when arriving at their destination or point of transferasts: above ground Storage tanksbmps: Best Management practicesbpR: Bureau of public roadsbRt: Bus rapid transit, form of premium transit that combines the attractiveness of rail transit with the low cost of bus transit.core Routes: the primary transit routes within a transit network. ccRow: country club right-of-Wayctpp: census transportation planning products describing worker travel patterns used in the StopS ridership forecasting modeldu: Dwelling unitea (in cost-estimating): each. a measure used in cost-estimating to indicate items are budgeted in discrete numeric quantities (e.g., 10 poles).edR: environmental Data resourcesepa: environmental protection agencyFaR: Floor-to-area ratioFema: the Federal emergency Management agency responsible for mapping 100-year and 500-year floodplainsFta: Federal transit administration gtFs: General transit Feed Specification; an open source description of transit service locations and timeskcata: Kansas city area transit authority; the primary transit operator in the Kansas city metropolitan areakcmo: Kansas city, Missourikcumb: Kansas city University of Medicine and Biosciences; a medical school located on independence avenuekdhe: Kansas Department of Health and environment

land use: the function of land for different human purposes or economic activities. typical categories for land use are dwellings, industrial use, transport, recreational use or nature protection areaslF: Linear Feet. a measure of length used for cost-estimating purposes.los: Level of Service; a measure of traffic flow effectiveness used by traffic engineerslpa: Locally preferred alternativelRt: Light rail transitls: Lump Sum. a measure used in cost-estimating to indicate an item is budgeted as a whole.map-21: Moving ahead for progress in the 21st century; the most recent federal transportation bill maRc: Mid-america regional council; the Kansas city area’s Metropolitan planning organization and the lead transportation planning organization in the metropolitan areamaRc nRI: Mid-america regional council natural resource inventorymdnR: Missouri Department of natural resourcesmixed-traffic: a configuration in which the streetcar tracks are embedded in automobile lanes so that both streetcars and automobiles can share the lanes.modot: Missouri Department of transportationmulti-modal: travel by various forms of transportation (bus/streetcar/train/bike/etc.)mutcd: Manual on Uniform traffic control Devicesnacto: national association of city transportation officialsnepa: national environmental policy actnew starts / small starts: Fta’s major transit investment program for fixed guideway (rail and bus rapid transit) transportation improvements.npdes: national pollutant Discharge elimination SystemnRhp: national register of Historic placesnwI: national Wetland inventory

818

pce: perchloroethyleneRidership forecast: the projected average number of passengers on a future transit route based on a four step model that assesses socio-economic data, operating plans, and census journey to work flows. Route-miles (Rm): a measure of the extent of a streetcar system by the number of miles of route on which it runs. often, a route contains tracks in both directions.Row: right-of-Wayscc: Standard cost categories used by the Fta for cost estimationsemi-exclusive: a configuration in which streetcar tracks generally run in their own right-of-way (not shared with automobiles; for example, a median) except at infrequent intervals where they cross a street or intersection.sF (in economic impact calculations): Square Feet social equity: a state at which all people in a given society share the same status in a certain detail. it entails equal rights, opportunities, obligations as well as economic equitystops: Simplified trips-on-project Software; the Fta’s newly developed model for estimating ridership on fixed guideway transit systemstdd: transportation Development District; a political subdivision formed to finance transportation projectstod: transit oriented Developmentthrough Route: a method of configuring and scheduling transit service wherein vehicles travel from the end of one route through a central area to the end of a second route.track-miles (tm): a measure of the extent of a streetcar system by the number of miles of track. in a typical system, track-miles will be roughly twice the value of route-miles, because a route will typically have tracks in both directions. transit signal priority: a transit priority measure that provides more green time for transit vehicles under specified conditions through an interface between the transit vehicle and traffic signal controllertRb: transportation research Boardusdot: United States Department of transportation VmF: Vehicle Maintenance FacilityVmt: Vehicle miles travelledV/c Ratio: Volume-to-capacity ratio; the measurement of the available capacity for a roadway where the volume on a roadway is divided by the theoretical capacity of the roadwayYoe: year of expenditure; the expected year in which construction funds will be spent.

ph

ase

II e

xpa

nsI

on

pla

n

St

re

etc

ar

ex

pan

Sio

n p

ro

jec

t

819

nextrail kc: phase ii streetcar expansion plan (book 3 of 3)

Documents