news in brief · bristol-meyers squibb, glaxosmith-kline, janssen pharmaceutical research and...

2
656 | CANCER DISCOVERYAUGUST 2012 www.aacrjournals.org NEWS IN BRIEF Cell Lines Often Misidentified Christopher Korch, PhD, doesn’t like being the bearer of bad news. The director of the University of Colorado Cancer Center’s DNA Sequencing and Analysis Service recently analyzed a cell line that a researcher thought was endometrial cancer only to discover that it was actu- ally breast cancer. The news forced the researcher to halt publication of a study in which he had used the misidentified cells. “It’s hard to tell someone that their conclusions may be flawed and that they’ve lost 6 months’, a year’s, or a decade’s worth of work,” says Korch. Unfortunately, such conversa- tions aren’t rare, says Korch. He and his colleagues recently published a study in Gynecologic Oncology that used DNA profiling to analyze dozens of ovarian and endometrial cell lines collected from multiple institutions in the United States, Europe, and Japan. They found significant rates of misidentification, contamination, and redundancy among the samples. Among 51 samples purportedly from ovarian cancer cell lines, the researchers identified 8 as existing breast cancer, teratocarcinoma, or cervical cancer cell lines; 10 were redundant cell lines. Two supposedly normal endometrial cell lines were genotyped and found to be HeLa cervical carcinoma cells and MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The new study adds to evidence compiled over several years showing that 18% to 50% of cell lines used in biomedical research, including cancer research, are misidentified, contami- nated, or redundant. Samples that are mislabeled and then shared aren’t the only cause of identity problems. Equipment could be improperly sterilized or two research- ers could be working with different cultures in the same hood, explains Korch. Also, cells can travel in aerosols, landing where they shouldn’t, and survive. “HeLa grows well and can out- compete if they get into the culture of a slow-grower,” he says. The American Type Culture Col- lection, a nonprofit biologic resource center based in Manassas, VA, released PEOPLE Howard Ozer, MD, PhD, known for his research on leuke- mias and lympho- mas, was appointed director of the University of Illinois Cancer Center (UICC) in Chicago in June. He had been serving as interim director since the January 2011 death of the institution’s previous leader, Gary Kruh, MD, PhD. Among other responsibilities, Ozer will oversee the UICC application to become a National Cancer Institute– designated cancer center. Sir Mark Walport, PhD, MB BChir, director of the Wellcome Trust in the United Kingdom (UK), has been appointed as the UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser, beginning in April 2013. Succeeding Sir John Beddington, he will help ensure that scientific knowledge informs policy decisions. Walport has led the Wellcome Trust, a global charity dedicated to funding biomedical research, since 2003. John C. Reed, MD, PhD, chief executive officer of Sanford- Burnham Medical Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, was named editor-in- chief of Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, effective August 1. He replaces Daniel Von Hoff, MD, the journal’s founding editor. Reed earned his medical and doctoral degrees from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia, where he also completed his clinical postdoctoral training. His research focuses on mechanisms that regulate apoptosis and how defects in apoptosis contribute to disease. The recipient of numerous awards and honors, Reed has served on the editorial boards of several journals, including Cancer Research and Clinical Cancer Research. UIC Photo Services Wellcome Library, London voluntary guidelines in January calling for the routine authentication of cell lines with short tandem repeat (STR) profiling. Widely available, STR profil- ing takes about a week and costs $100 to $200 per sample. “It’s the equivalent of about 20 lattes to profile a cell line and know whether what you have is what you want,” says Korch. “Is that too much to spend? Well, I’d rather be sure.” NCATS–Industry Project Gains Backers An effort by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) to connect aca- demic researchers with industry to revive drugs that passed safety testing but failed for their initial treatment indications has signed on 5 additional pharmaceutical companies. Early-adopters AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer, who backed the Discover- ing New Therapeutic Uses for Existing Molecules program at its launch in May, are being joined by Abbott, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, GlaxoSmith- Kline, Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, and Sanofi. In fiscal year 2013, the program will provide up to $20 million to fund 2- to 3-year cooperative research grants that propose to investigate new therapeutic uses for any of the 58 compounds pro- vided by the corporate partners. The initiative “provides the oppor- tunity to tap into the collective brain power of scientists across the United States and match a great scientific idea with the right industry compound,” says program director Christine Colvis, PhD, of NCATS. In addition, the pilot program’s template agreements for intellectual property rights “will significantly reduce the amount of time it takes for each of the partners to negotiate the terms,” says Colvis. For corporate partners looking to take advantage of external research tal- ent, the program makes perfect sense. “We’re a very small percentage of the total knowledge base,” says Donald Frail, PhD, vice president of Science New Opportunities at AstraZeneca Innovative Medicines in Waltham, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute on March 22, 2020. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 17-Mar-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NEWS IN BRIEF · Bristol-Meyers Squibb, GlaxoSmith-Kline, Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, and Sanofi . In fi scal year 2013, the program will provide up to $20

656 | CANCER DISCOVERY�AUGUST 2012 www.aacrjournals.org

NEWS IN BRIEF

Cell Lines Often Misidentified

Christopher Korch, PhD, doesn’t like being the bearer of bad news.

The director of the University of Colorado Cancer Center’s DNA Sequencing and Analysis Service recently analyzed a cell line that a researcher thought was endometrial cancer only to discover that it was actu-ally breast cancer. The news forced the researcher to halt publication of a study in which he had used the misidentifi ed cells. “It’s hard to tell someone that their conclusions may be fl awed and that they’ve lost 6 months’, a year’s, or a decade’s worth of work,” says Korch.

Unfortunately, such conversa-tions aren’t rare, says Korch. He and his colleagues recently published a study in Gynecologic Oncology that used DNA profi ling to analyze dozens of ovarian and endometrial cell lines collected from multiple institutions in the United States, Europe, and Japan. They found signifi cant rates of misidentifi cation, contamination, and redundancy among the samples.

Among 51 samples purportedly from ovarian cancer cell lines, the researchers identifi ed 8 as existing breast cancer, teratocarcinoma, or cervical cancer cell lines; 10 were redundant cell lines. Two supposedly normal endometrial cell lines were genotyped and found to be HeLa cervical carcinoma cells and MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

The new study adds to evidence compiled over several years showing that 18% to 50% of cell lines used in biomedical research, including cancer research, are misidentifi ed, contami-nated, or redundant.

Samples that are mislabeled and then shared aren’t the only cause of identity problems. Equipment could be improperly sterilized or two research-ers could be working with different cultures in the same hood, explains Korch. Also, cells can travel in aerosols, landing where they shouldn’t, and survive. “HeLa grows well and can out-compete if they get into the culture of a slow-grower,” he says.

The American Type Culture Col-lection, a nonprofi t biologic resource center based in Manassas, VA, released

PEOPLE

Howard Ozer, MD, PhD, known for his research on leuke-mias and lympho-mas, was appointed director of the University of Illinois Cancer Center

(UICC) in Chicago in June. He had been serving as interim director since the January 2011 death of the institution’s previous leader, Gary Kruh, MD, PhD.

Among other responsibilities, Ozer will oversee the UICC application to become a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center.

Sir Mark Walport, PhD, MB BChir, director of the Wellcome Trust in the United Kingdom (UK), has been appointed as the UK Government Chief

Scientific Adviser, beginning in April 2013. Succeeding Sir John Beddington, he will help ensure that scientific knowledge informs policy decisions. Walport has led the Wellcome Trust, a global charity dedicated to funding biomedical research, since 2003.

John C. Reed, MD, PhD, chief executive officer of Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, was named editor-in-chief of Molecular

Cancer Therapeutics, effective August 1. He replaces Daniel Von Hoff, MD, the journal’s founding editor.

Reed earned his medical and doctoral degrees from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia, where he also completed his clinical postdoctoral training. His research focuses on mechanisms that regulate apoptosis and how defects in apoptosis contribute to disease.

The recipient of numerous awards and honors, Reed has served on the editorial boards of several journals, including Cancer Research and Clinical Cancer Research.

UIC

Ph

oto

Se

rvic

es

We

llco

me

Lib

rary

, Lo

nd

on

voluntary guidelines in January calling for the routine authentication of cell lines with short tandem repeat (STR) profi ling. Widely available, STR profi l-ing takes about a week and costs $100 to $200 per sample.

“It’s the equivalent of about 20 lattes to profi le a cell line and know whether what you have is what you want,” says Korch. “Is that too much to spend? Well, I’d rather be sure.” ■

NCATS–Industry Project Gains Backers

An effort by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) to connect aca-demic researchers with industry to revive drugs that passed safety testing but failed for their initial treatment indications has signed on 5 additional pharmaceutical companies.

Early-adopters AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Pfi zer, who backed the Discover-ing New Therapeutic Uses for Existing Molecules program at its launch in May, are being joined by Abbott, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, GlaxoSmith-Kline, Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, and Sanofi .

In fi scal year 2013, the program will provide up to $20 million to fund 2- to 3-year cooperative research grants that propose to investigate new therapeutic uses for any of the 58 compounds pro-vided by the corporate partners.

The initiative “provides the oppor-tunity to tap into the collective brain power of scientists across the United States and match a great scientifi c idea with the right industry compound,” says program director Christine Colvis, PhD, of NCATS.

In addition, the pilot program’s template agreements for intellectual property rights “will signifi cantly reduce the amount of time it takes for each of the partners to negotiate the terms,” says Colvis.

For corporate partners looking to take advantage of external research tal-ent, the program makes perfect sense. “We’re a very small percentage of the total knowledge base,” says Donald Frail, PhD, vice president of Science New Opportunities at AstraZeneca Innovative Medicines in Waltham,

San

ford

-Bu

rnh

am M

ed

ical

Re

sear

ch In

stit

ute

on March 22, 2020. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 2: NEWS IN BRIEF · Bristol-Meyers Squibb, GlaxoSmith-Kline, Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, and Sanofi . In fi scal year 2013, the program will provide up to $20

2012;2:656. Cancer Discovery     Cell Lines Often Misidentified

  Updated version

  http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/2/8/656.2

Access the most recent version of this article at:

   

   

   

  E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts

  Subscriptions

Reprints and

  [email protected]

To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at

  Permissions

  Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)

.http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/2/8/656.2To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link

on March 22, 2020. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from