newarch sampler

Upload: maxx001

Post on 05-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Newarch Sampler

    1/3

    T H E N E W A R C H A E O L O G Y R E V I E W M a r c h 2 0 0 6 P A G E 8

    On March 25, the chief researcher of a large sunken

    structure in Japanese waters presented his findings at a

    special conference sponsored by the Japan Petrograph

    Society. Masaaki Kimura, Ph.D., one of Japans fore-most geologists with a world-class reputation, has been

    investigating the site over the last four years.

    He was one of three speakers at the Fukuoka conference describing

    recent discoveries in underwater archaeology. Other presenters

    including Professor Nobuhiro Yoshida, who discussed another

    Japanese sub-surface find near the small island of Okinoshima, in the

    Korean Sea, and Frank Joseph, Ancient American editor; who spoke

    of his dive experiences at the so-called "Bimini Road," in the

    Bahamas.

    Dr. Kimuras researching is outlined in his new

    book, Submarine Ruins of Yonaguni. It featuressome of the most commonly asked questions

    about the site, and excerpts appear below to

    may be the most important discovery of this

    kind. Its significance notwithstanding, virtually

    nothing about Yonaguni has appeared in the

    U.S. News media.

    As Professor Kimura makes clear, the man-made

    character of the drowned structure is no longer

    questionable. Precisely who built it, however, is

    still debated. However, a growing number of investigators, both in

    Japan and elsewhere, conclude that Yonaguni is at least related tostories of a formerly great kingdom known as Mu or Lemuria, which

    was engulfed by a natural catastrophe in the

    ancient past.

    Lemuria was supposed to have been the

    homeland of Asian, Polynesian and

    pre-Columbian American civilizations.

    In any case, the underwater find promis-

    es to make its impact on our under-

    standing of civilized origins.

    Where is thestructure located?

    Its in Okinawa Prefecture,

    near the island of

    Yonaguni, in the sea

    about 100 meters off

    Arakawabana. Yonaguni

    is an almond-shaped

    island at the southwest

    tip of the Ryukyu chain, approximately ten kilometers long from east

    to west and four kilometers from north to south. Some 1,800 per-

    sons live there, making a living mainly from farming fishing and the

    tourist business.

    When was it discovered and by

    whom?Local fisherman knew of rumors that there was

    a curious rock structure submerged in the sea

    for the past half-century or so, but it wasnt rec-

    ognized as a relic. In 1986, while conducting a

    diving survey to map diving spots in the

    Yonaguni area, Kihachiro Aratake started call-

    ing it "Iseki Point," based on his impression that

    somehow, it didnt seem to be a natural object

    Then when an underwater survey team of the

    University of the Ryukyus began to study it, it became widely known

    What makes you believe thatthis structure is man-made,that it was made by peoplelong ago?

    There are many indications of human

    involvement. There is something like a

    road carved around it. In the level

    rock faces, there are a large number

    of tool marks. There is a feature that

    seems to be a drainage canal

    extending from top to bottom.

    There are walls angled at a fairly

    THE LOSTUNDERWATER CITY

    OFYONAGUNI

    THE LOSTUNDERWATER CITY

    OFYONAGUNIAN INTERVIEW WITH JAPANESE GEOLOGISTDR. MASAAKI KIMURA(Originally published in Ancient American MagazineVol. 6 Issue. 39)

    YonaguniisatlerelatedtostoriesoformerlygreatkingdknownasMuorLemuria,whichwaengulfedbyanaturacatastropheintheancientpast.

  • 8/2/2019 Newarch Sampler

    2/3

    accurate 90 degrees, or

    right angles, that

    extend over distances of

    some tens of meters

    at several loca-

    tions. It is sur-

    rounded by a stairway-like structure, not just onthe south side, but all around. The north side

    structure shows the strongest indication of having

    been man-made. Furthermore, one part of it is a stonework

    stairway.

    Why is it underwater?

    It was built on land, and then, because of global warming, the level

    of the oceans

    rose and left is

    s u b m e r g e d .

    Another factor

    to consider is

    crustal move-

    ments, but no

    concrete evi-

    dence of that

    has been discov-

    ered yet.

    When was it built?

    It was probably built somewhere between six thousand and eight

    thousand years ago, probably even ten thousand or more years ago.

    At that time, sea-level was as much as forty meters lower than it isnow.

    What shape is it?

    It looks like a stepped pyramid with the top part removed, rather like

    a pedestal. At the base, the dimensions are about 250 meters along

    the north-south axis. Its a rectangular shape, and the height from

    the base to the apex is 26 meters. The based is submerged 25 meters

    below sea level, leaving the tip exposed about one meter above sea-

    level.

    How was it made?

    Using tools made from stone that doesnt fracture easily, holes couldbe drilled into the rock, and a wooden or stone wedge, like an arrow

    head, could be put in the hole to chip off the rock. This is one idea.

    We tend to think that people of that era, lacking metal tools, would

    be unable to cut

    stone. However,

    if you know the

    characteristics

    of the rock you

    are working, it

    can be compar-

    atively easy to

    cut, or process.

    Are there any other submerged archaeologicarelics in the world like that one at Yonaguni?

    There arent any just like it, in the sense of being carved out of an

    entire knoll or rocky out-crop. However, in bays and lakes through-

    out the world, there are many submerged archaeological artifacts

    One good example is found at the Alexandria site, in the

    Mediterranean Sea. The Alexandria ruins date from a large scale

    earthquake that occurred some 1,200 years ago, when a whole citysank below the sea. Such sinking occurs because of either crusta

    movement or earthquake, as in the Alexandria case, or a rise in sea-

    level. Regarding Yonagunis relics, its quite likely that a rise in sea-

    level was the key element.

    How about elsewhere on Yonaguni Island? Isthere anything that might be related to theunderwater structure such as legends or records?

    Yes, there is. On the northern part of the island in the area fronting

    the sea, there is an oral memo-

    ry that "Long, long ago an

    island sank." Also, in thesouth west, there is a tradi-

    tional belief, or cult, known

    as the Niraikanai, and in that

    tradition, stories are told of

    ancient continent sunk

    beneath the sea."

    Is there any defini-tive proof thatthis structure isman-made?

    Conclusive proof is

    being discovered in

    rapid succession. By

    this, I mean things

    that show human

    beings were active

    there. Among the evidence are

    traces of marks that show that men worked the stone

    There are holes made by wedge-like tools still called kusabi in many

    locations throughout the Ryukyu Islands. Around the outside of the

    loop road there is a row of neatly stacked rocks as a stone wall, each

    rock about twice the size of a person, in a straight line.

    T H E N E W A R C H A E O L O G Y R E V I E W M a r c h 2 0 0 6 P A G E 9

  • 8/2/2019 Newarch Sampler

    3/3

    There are traces

    carved along the

    roadway that show

    some form of

    repairs were under-

    taken. The structure

    is continuous fromunder the water to

    land, and evidence of the use of fire is present. Stone tools are

    among the artifacts found under water and on land. Stone tablets

    with carving that appear to be letters or symbols, such as what we

    know as the "plus-sign" and a V-shape were retrieved from the

    sunken structure. From the

    waters nearby, stone tools

    were found. Two are for

    known purposes, but the

    majority are not.

    At the bottom of the sea,a relief carving of an ani-

    mal figure was discovered

    on a huge stone. In two

    locations, implements that were

    conceivably used by people who

    lived there, such as tools struck

    from stone, very important evi-

    dence, have turned up one after

    the other. And the most convinc-

    ing evidence is the next piece.Inscribed into Sanninu-dai,

    there is a large relief carving of a

    bird.

    Suppose that the structure is

    acknowledged

    as a submerged

    artifact. What

    significance would that recognition have?

    Human history, the history of civilization, would

    probably have to be rewritten to account for the

    existence of such stone construction on that large of

    a scale in East Asia, 10,000 years ago.

    Photo

    courtesy

    ofRobertSchoc

    h

    Photo

    courtesyofR

    obertSchoch

    C O U N T E R P O I N T

    Comments on Yonaguni

    Robert M. Schoch

    I have visited the small island of Yonaguni on threeseparate occasions, making numerous dives eachtime, and also having an opportunity to explore thesurface of the island thoroughly. Additionally, Ihave dived some of the other reputed man-madeunderwater ruins in the Okinawa area. In sum, Iremain unconvinced that these underwater struc-tures are primarily artificial or man-made; I thinkthey are due primarily to natural geologicalprocesses. However,as I have elaborate in mybook Voices of the Rocks(R. M. Schoch with R. A.McNally, 1999) and elsewhere, the choice between

    natural and man-made is not nec-essarily a simpleeither/or issue.On YonaguniIsland are a num-ber of very oldtombs, artifacts,and other man-made structuresthat indicateancient human

    habitation of theisland. The archi-tecture of some ofthe tombs is verysimilar to the natural structures, both above waterand below the waves, found at Yonaguni. It is possi-ble that humans were imitating nature in designingtheir tombs, and it is equally possible that the so-called Yonaguni Monument is a primarily naturalfeature that itself was somewhat modified by humanhands. The ancient inhabitants may have partiallyreshaped or enhanced a natural structure to give itmore the form they wished, perhaps as a structureunto itself or as the foundation for timber, mud, orstone structures that have since been destroyed.

    T H E N E W A R C H A E O L O G Y R E V I E W M a r c h 2 0 0 6 P A G E 1 0