New York State Report Cards

Program Report Cards

Fiscal Year 08/09

Presented by:

Rosemary Matt

NRS Liaison for NYS

Evaluated in TWO Methods

NYS Benchmarks Quartile Ranked

Educational Gain = 41%

Follow Up Outcomes = 59%

Meet Benchmarks = Proficient

(Employment, GED/HS Diploma, and Postsecondary or Training)

Educational Gain (Weighted)

Follow Up Outcomes

Quartile 1 0 - .99 Unacceptable

Quartile 2 1 – 1.99 Needs Improvement

Quartile 3 2 – 2.99 Proficient

Quartile 4 3 – 4.00 Highly Proficient

First, an overview of the program:

NYS Benchmark Summary:

Meets NYS Benchmarks (both) = Proficient

Does Not Meet NYS Benchmarks (one or both) = In Need of Improvement

(If score places program in Quartile 1, then = Unacceptable)

Quartile Rank Summary:

Note: Quartile Rank includes

Weighted Educational Gain

Weighted Academic Gain:

Follow Up Outcomes:

Raw numbers used to calculate Program Performance in Percent

# students achieving goal

# students exiting with goal= 69.6%

1

23

Goal Setting & Response Rate:

Overall Performance:

Quartile Rank:

Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4

0 1 2 3 4

2.70

Total Score

Total score is calculated as in the past Maximum rating points to be earned:

– Weighted Academic Gain 16– Follow-up Measures (2) 8– Goal setting 4– Response Rate 4

– Maximum Total 32

Emphasis in FY08/09:

•Educational Gain (50%)

•Follow Up Outcomes (25%)

•Employment & GED Goal Setting (12.5%)

•Response Rate (12.5%)

Emphasis changes for FY09/10:

•Educational Gain (40%)

•Follow Up Outcomes (20%)

•Post Test Rate* (20%)

•Employment & GED Goal Setting (10%)

•Response Rate (10%)

NYS Statistics

Capital/North4%

Central So. Tier9%

Finger Lakes6%

Hudson Valley13%

Long Island16%

NYC45%

West7%

Total Number of Students Reported

133,253 Students

Report Card Facts:

180 programs ranked Literacy volunteer programs included in

rankings 150 programs met the NYS benchmarks, 30

did not 45 programs were rated Highly Proficient,

105 programs Proficient, 5 programs Needing Improvement and 25 programs Unacceptable

Comparisons to FY08/09

Proficiency FY07/08 FY08/09

Highly Proficient 25% 25%

Proficient 41% 58%

Needs Improvement 9% 3%

Unacceptable 23% 14%

Comparisons to FY08/09

In FY07/08 33% of programs failed to meet the NYS Benchmarks

In FY08/09 only 17% failed to meet the NYS Benchmarks

FY09/10 Benchmarks

Educational Gain = 46% Post Test Rate = 65% Follow Up Outcomes = 69%

EPE Programs:

Amendment Log

Amendment Log