new york harbor observing and prediction system

14
ASSIMILATION OF HIGH- FREQUENCY RADAR SURFACE CURRENTS INTO A COASTAL OCEAN MODEL OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC BIGHT Alan F. Blumberg George Meade Bond Professor Director Davidson Laboratory Stevens Institute of Technology Liang Kuang and Nickitas Georgas IEEE-MTS 12 Ocean Meeting October 17, 2012

Upload: vita

Post on 24-Feb-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ASSIMILATION OF HIGH-FREQUENCY RADAR SURFACE CURRENTS INTO A COASTAL OCEAN MODEL OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC BIGHT Alan F. Blumberg George Meade Bond Professor Director Davidson Laboratory Stevens Institute of Technology Liang Kuang and Nickitas Georgas I EEE-MTS 12 Ocean Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

ASSIMILATION OF HIGH-FREQUENCY RADAR SURFACE CURRENTS INTO A COASTAL OCEAN MODEL OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC BIGHT

Alan F. Blumberg

George Meade Bond Professor Director Davidson Laboratory Stevens Institute of Technology

Liang Kuang and Nickitas Georgas

IEEE-MTS 12 Ocean Meeting October 17, 2012

Page 2: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

New York Harbor Observing and Prediction SystemIntegrated system of observing sensors and forecast modelsTO OBSERVE TO PREDICTTO COMMUNICATE Weather Currents Water Level Salinity Temperature Waves

Page 3: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

How?

Observe

Ground-Truth ServeAutomatically

Forecast

Page 4: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

A fully automated system of systemsNew York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

0.5 hrs + 1.5 hrs + 2.0 hrs

Page 5: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

C:\Documents and Settings\hroarty\My Documents\COOL\01 CODAR\MARCOOS\Renewal

HF radar System

Page 6: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

6

SLDMB Drifter

Page 7: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

7

Methodology—Data Assimilation

• Data Assimilation- Nudging Scheme

0( ) ( )u physics u ut

2 0

2( )

( , )1 * * *dNUDGE d

r t t ztR z

i ja

e e et

Page 8: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

8

Non-tidal mean surface currents: HF radar vs. NYHOPS

Before After

From Jun 9th, 2011 to Jul 21st, 2011. Scale is in 10cm/s.

Page 9: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

9

Tidal currents(M2 ellipses) after DA

Before After

From Jun 9th, 2011 to Jul 21st, 2011. Scale is in 10cm/s.

Page 10: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

10

uv

RMSE between NYHOPS Hindcast, Drifter currents before and after data assimilation (cm/s)

U U_DA U_diff V V_DA V_diff

1 12.1 11.8 0.3 8.6 8.5 0.1

3 11.1 10.1 1.0 13.7 12.9 0.8

4A 15.5 14.7 0.8 14.3 13.7 0.6

4B 17.5 15.6 1.9 16.9 16.0 0.9

4C 17.2 16.6 0.6 16.8 14.9 1.9

average14.7 13.6 1.1 14.1 13.0 1.1

Positive means improvement

Page 11: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

11

43 (3X) Reseeding particle-tracking simulations

Page 12: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

12

RMSE of NYHOPS Forecast, Drifter currents before and after data assimilation (cm/s)

U U_DA U_diff V V_DA V_diff

1 17.5 17.3 0.2 11.2 11.0 0.2

3 17.3 16.1 1.2 13.5 12.4 1.1

4A 19.8 19.1 0.7 16.3 15.4 0.9

4B 22.4 20.6 1.8 22.3 20.3 2.0

4C 27.6 25.9 1.7 22.4 21.4 1.0

Average21.0 20.0 1.0 17.1 16.3 0.8

Page 13: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

13

43 (3X) Reseeding particle-tracking simulations

Page 14: New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System

14

Conclusions• NYHOPS established as an urban ocean forecast system –

large following with multiple constituencies• Using currents derived from drifters for validation:

Average RMS errors of hindcast and 1 day forecast shows 8% improvementsParticle-tracking simulations showed improvements of 7% (hindcast) and 10% ( 1 day forecast) based on separation distances

• The future work - assimilation using more advanced schemes, such as Kalman Filter/LRTKF, 3D and 4D var