new ti · 2020. 5. 4. · and/ applied aspects of benefit-cost analysis. the bibliography is...

ti

R;.,..)0 Su! iON Tf f (WWI,

o -E6:106 959

AUTHORTITLE

INSTITUTION'PUB DATE

DOCUMENT RESUME

ti

4%

EA 607 152

Mitchell, Bruce;,Mitchell, JoanBenefit-Cost Analysis: A Select.Bibliography.Exchange Bibliography No. 267,Council of Planning Librarians, Monticellor'll.LMar 72

' , NOTE r 46p.t AVAILABLE FROM Council of Planning Librarians, P.O., Box 229,

Monticello, Illinois 61856 ($4.50)

MF-$0.16 HC-$1.95 PLUS POSTAGE*Bibliographies; City Planning; *Cost Effectiveness;Interest; *flanning; Recreation; Regional Planning:Resources; *Theories; Transportation; WaterResources

-

EDRS PRICEDESQ.RIPTORS

ABSTRACT41

The purpose of this bibliography is to present a'range of sources that will provide guidelines to both theoretical and/applied aspects of benefit-cost analysis. The bibliography is dividedintoJtwo principal sections, with subsections and categories in each.The first section, entitled Background, provides introductory andconceptual7references to he technique. The first subsection(Benefit-Cost Analysis) has categories of introduction, background,discounting and interest rates, and further considerations. Thefollowing subsection (Cost-Effectiveness Analysis) has categories ofintroduction and application. The second, or Applications section,,includes six subsections covering problems of interest to planners:(1) regional planning and resources management, (2) urban, (3),

transportation, (4) human resources, (5) recreation, and (6) water..

(Author/MLF) -

.4,

1

)

Council of Planning Librarians 'EXCHANGE BIBLIOGRAPHY

6A

Ma'rch 1972

"T

sK

6...-

...

a/ ' \

.

- A '1 BENEFIT . ;C-.6ST ANALYSIS: *A Select Bibliography

.,

Bruce Mitchell, Assistant Professor t

'Department of Geography, University of Waterloo4

4

andJoan Mitchell, Librarian .Technical. Services, The Library, Waterloo Lutheran University

C\2

66.

V DEPARTMENT OF,HFALTHEDUCATION &WELFARENATIONAL NSTTuTE OF

EDUCATIONNY 14- Hf f% !;t Pk, r

( D tR,

-.( , 6, -6. 7. NN NN NI .,0,4

1. -( % %! t Cr 4k tkt.j. ;( % -%, % v..ff^ N 1, r

IT,

- -#

/' Mrs. Mary Vance, EditorPost Office Box 229Monticello, Illinois 61856

.1.1

E

J"

.S'

0

4

0

COthICIL OF PLAONINGIIBRARIANS f Exchange Bibt.ography #267 4

BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS:

A SELECT DIBLICGRABEY

by*

is .Bruce Mitchell,

Assistant PiofessorDepartment of GeographyUniversity of Waterloo_Waterloo., Ontari4

ce"

and

JoaMitchell,brarian.

T6 cal Service-a

The LibraryWaterloo' Lutheran University

Waterloo, Ontario

I

PREFACE

The purpose of this bibliography is to present a5.ange of.

sources which will provide guidelines to both theoretical and

aplied aspects, of benefit-cost analysis. In this context,. bene-

iit-oost analysis is; .defined as a-technique in which the costs and

benefits of 'different projects and/er.programs are compared. The"

purpose of such comparison is to facilitwte ranking and Selection

r,of a\range of aternatives, whether they are damb, highways or re-

. training prOgrams.' 1.

There.are at least two ways that a bibliography-on benefit- ,.

cost analysis might be structuud. One approach would be to assign

.

references to,various conceptual or problematic categogies. For

example, references might.be listed under the following types of

headings: prices, economic life, interest rates, discount proced-

ures, secondary effects, intangibles. A second approach, perhaps

3

a

O

: OMA. 0

CPL,Exphange .Bibliography #267u

:more pragmatic, would be tbrligt.refe'reiices tin*, topical headings,O c

.

such as urban, 'transportation, or recreation:"0

j .

Both approaches raise', problems First, both methods result

in categories which may 44 be mutually exclusive., For example,-

specificdoes a stUdysf traffic and.roadg in 'a specifie city getlisted "

.1

under an urban or, transportation'hetdirig? -The same study may alv.

.

touch upon problems of handling interest rates and of4

intangibles. Second the approach outlined(initially may nave

limitations for the person .unfmri71.ar wit benefit-cost analysis.,

anct who is looliing for,the mariner in which it has been applied in.

problems similar 1p his 'own. Conversely, the latter approach'mY

not point the way to speciftc problems associated, with the techni-

que. U.may be answers to problems such as discount rates or,

economic life that the researcher is seeking.

With the above in mind, this bibliography is divided'into

two principal sections, with subsections and categories in each.

The first settion, entitled,Background, provides introduCtory and

conceptual references.to the technique. Thlifirst sublsectiona

(Benefit-Cost Analysis) includes a number Of.genenal references

to the technique,as well as papers ascudsing its opportunities

and limitations. Two categories (Introduction; Background) con-

lain references ranging from general discussion of the eeehni4e

to the treatment of problems and questions in more detail. The1-4

remaining categories (Discounting and Interest Rates; Further

Congiderations) consider very specific theoretical and operationalc

problems. br providing such refereflees at,the-outset, it is hoped

a

I

F.,

.

N. .,

that tfie.reader looking fox eitherintroductory material or.Iliater-1

-.

, -dal disclisping Specific questions will be accommodated.%

e

3. CPL ExchangeLibliography

.;* .. ,,

,

S. I

... The clewing subseb6n (CslrEffectiktenessAnalysis) is... . - 4,

'included in an IttBript to eli/pinatp' dor -0 of the confusion between

the two terms"benefits-cost an ysis"and gaiSt-effectiveness

.,e-

palysis". -It is sugdeite4'here cOst-effeb4veriess analysis

is conceptually similar to 'what ib often referrePto as operations4

research-or Systems anal-ibis's In other words, theseeterms.refer

4.

1%

to- an analytical procedure '1,thictte,:pmt's to assist decision-makers

,,

in identifying 4 preferred choice front A range- Of To. . ..

.

realise this end, cost -effeotiven6.

".

attempts to model a pro4lellik,

. and then apply either one or some combination of techniques to

.

evaluate altprnatives..-Benlfit-cost,analysisyould be one such

technique, alpfng with others slid' as simulation) gaming linear,

programing and statistical anrlysis. thus, the twocategdrisS

`(introdilotion and ApplicationS) are inpluded with the thought thatI, . . . I.

.

.. .. . , ,

their references mught helpo place benefit'cost analysis in per-,

spective. The references in the Applications.Category of cost-.

...

'effectiveness analysis range fromtagricul ure, air pollution,

public health, education and Water supplf to urban trazsportation.

The.second,'.ti- Applications section, includes'six subsections

covering problehs of interest to'plannors. The subsection entitled

Planning' and Resources Management covers a 'variety of top-i e

ics ranging from evaluation of lodal government expenditures and

land assembly programs? to regional development projects, tt

specific resource issues such as agriculture, fisheries and energy..

f

za:

e.

a.

o

.. .

%, .

.4. , CPL Z7 xchane Biblography#267a '%

,The second subsection (Urban) .focuses upon ,the ap plicatil of bene- '....

fit -c ost analysis in , general urban planning as well as to*reneCal...

.,,

. ..sad services. under the latter categories:are.tound studibs rang-

. 4_ ,

inginrdoverge frawlum, cleargnce to provision of waste Conde-.* 0 .

cs. ktion, libraries and. schools. The' following subsection (Transport--,'

4: *ation) illustrates how the technique has been applied to problemse.

ranging from subways to highways:to air transsort. Some, of the

transporta tion references are closely relayed to urban problems.

The Wbsectiop entitled Human4J/esourcess included' for sever-e,

al reason.' The planner by necessity must beCome more, concerned

with vocational and retraining pro ams, as well- as socifl welfare,

health andvrelaNed topics if comprehensive regional planning is to0 4- 'Y-

be realized. inrthermore4 the topics falling ihtct this . .o section

dramatically emphasize the difficulties of measuring intangible

.1 .factors or variables. Forlexample, what are the benefits, primary;. .

setbndaryand intangible, related to retraining, scnial welfare

I ...I,programs? Can theysbe idehtified, and, if so, canthey beiguanti-t,

Pied? If not, how might\benefit-cost analysis be used, on abused,

in the contUt of\suoh problehs?

Recreation., the title I'm, the fifth subsection, further

ustrates the difficulties of measuring intangibleb in benefitcost..a

studies. The first category presents a number of studies in which

benefit-cdst analysis has been Included explicitly in recreation

research. The second category, on the other hand, contains refer--

'"N ences shoving soMe!of the ,,different methods which havb been used,

in an attempt tp measure, and place a valte upOnreci:eatiOn:1

..f

r .1

4

ti

1'

a

.

\>

5. CPL Exchange BiLliography #267

The final subsection (Water) ieperhaps an appropriate one :?

with which to conclude since many would argue that benefit-cost

analysis was deVeloped in Water Studies. The first.categor3ein-

eludes some of the key or benchmark references in the development.

'd the technique for water redearch. The du bsequent categorie sS$

(Flood Oontr81; Irrilation; 1)ollution;:Supply) indicate how the, .

technique, has been applied in prthAmerica and abroad.,

It is hoped that.the second soctiOn (AppliCations) in combin-

ation with the first section.(Backgrau.nd) will provide both an

overvie4 and some illuatra'ions of benefit-cost nalysis in theory

and practice as represented by the literature from 1945to theA

,,present, with emphasis upon the period J.960 to 1970.

1

t"

3.

,

.6. . CPL. Exchange Bibliography #267

C

COMMITSv Page

1.

1.

2.

1.,

3.

Preface

A. BACKGROMID

-

e

,

..r,

.

1

,:.E3

9 `,

-13

1414'

15.145

15

1517

18

18202021

2?

22

22

2425

26

26'26

27

2728

.

Benefit-Cost Analysis

(1) Introduction. n.

(2) Background'

,

(3) Discountkng and Interest Rates(4) 'Further Considerations 4,

-externalities '-

-.intangibles

I -opportunity cogts '. s',', , -.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

(l)w Introduction(2) Applications

B. APPLICATIONS,

Regional Planniqg end Resources Management

(1) Evaluation of Programs and Proijects0) Regional Development(3) Rtralanid Agriculture

1(4) Fisheriea and Marine ResourcesEnergy

Urbank

(1) Urban Planning .

V), Urban Renewal, Redevelopment and Housing("5) Urban Service

Transportation

(1) Transportation Planniug(2) fir(3) Highways 4

(4 Navigation(5) Railroads

4. Human Resources 28

(1) Education 28(2) Employment and Training 29(3) Health and Welfare 31(4) Lau

:.32

(5) Research 32

.1/

5. alcreation

e 7. CPL Exchange Bibliography #26')

P32

(1). Applying Benefit-Cost 32'(2) Heasurement Problem 33

6. Water 35

(1) Background(2) Flood Control

. (3) Irrigation(4) Pollution(5) SIMPAY

,

k

7.

9

g,1

43

.4

i

4S

6. CPL Exchange'Bibliog4hy-#267

A. BACKWOUN.

D;.

1. Benefit-Cost Analysis

(1) Introduction . .

Armstrong, R.H.R:, "The use of cost benefit analysis in:thedecision-Taking procegs", Local Government Finance, Vol.74, Oct: 1970, pp...343-347.

Baumoll M., Welfare Economics and ,the Theory of the-State,Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1965, 2nd ed.

Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., "Benefit-cost analysis and publicsource detelopment", Journal Of Farm Economics, Vol. i37,No 195551.67Y-669.

f .-

Feldstein, 14.S., "Coat bene_ltanalysis and investment in thepublic sector% Public Administration, Vol. 1424 No..4:Winter 1964, pp. 351 -372.

a

Great Britain, Treasury-Centgr-for -Administrative Studies,Current issues in cost' benefit anal_y'sis by H.G. Walsh andA. Williams, London: H iin. S .0 .

Hammond,,R.J., "Conventi4ri and limitation in benefit-coatanalysis", Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, April1966, pp. 195-222. I

1.

Hines, L., "The hazards 'of benefit-cost analysis as a guide topublic investment policy", Public Finande, Vol. 17, No. 2,1962, pp. 101-117.

Krutilla, J,V., "'Welfare aspects of benefit-cost analysis",

Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 69, No. 3, June 1961,.

Maass, A., "Benefit-cost analysis: its relevance to publicinvestment decisions", Quarterly Journal of Economics,.Vol. 80, No. 2, May 1966, pp. 206-226.

Mumey, G.A., "A supplement on benefit-cost analysis", CanadianPolicies foe. Rural Adjustment, by H. Buckley and E. Tihanyi,Ottawa, Queen's Printer,_ 1967, pp. 157-170.

1./

Novozhilov, V., Problems of Cost Benefit Analysis in OptimalELEELE, White Plains, New- York, International Arts3cience Press,, 1970.

' 4 0

A4 Economic Leaflets, Florida University, Vol. 79, No. 5, May

1970, pp..14777

Anwar, T.K. (ed.), _.....Ccslefltlxsi.sAn, Lahore, Vest Pakis-tan, National Institute of Public Administration,. 1965.

Ash, M., "Light seeking light ", Town and Country Planning,.Vol. 37, no. 9, September 1969,,, pp. 409-412.

9. CPL Exchange Bibliography #267

Prest, A.R., and R. Turvey, "Cost-benefit analysis: a survey",EconomiNournai, Vol. 75, NO. 300, December.1965, pp: 683-735, "Reply",Thy J.L. Carr, Vol. 76, No. 304, Dedember 1966,

933-934.

Sewill, al.,-Guide to Benefit-CostOttawa, 9ueenks Pi-inter, 1961. 0. .* e

pargo, "Benefit-eopt analysis dildprojeceevaluation",Resources-for Tomorrow; 'Conference Back round Pa 9r, Vol.1, Ottawal:Queen's Printer, 19 1, pp. 299-310.

Stohler, J., 1'Zur method and technikeder cost benefit analy-sis", Vol. 201Fasc.,1, March 1967, .pp. 218-245t

Ward, J.T., "Cost 1)er-ifit analysis ", New Zealazj,Journal ofPublic Administration, Vol. 29, No. 2, March 1967, pp. 18-

"Wolfslast, J., Cost- Benefit .Analyse im, Gesundheitswesen,Hamburg, Verlag Weltarbhiv, 1968.

-(2) Background /

American Economic Association and the Royal Economic Society,"Resource Allocation",-Surve s of Economic Theory 111, NewYork, qt, Martin's Press,. 19 .

s

Anderson, A.A., "The variables of the benefit-oost:ratio",

Baumol, Economic theory and operations analysis, 2nded., Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hallo 1965.

A

Billerbeck, K. Koste'i -Ertra s-Analyse: els). Instrument zurRationaliAerung der administrierton Allokation beiBildungs-und Gesundheitsinvestitionen, Berlin,.B. Hessling, -

19613.

Bradford, D.P., "Constraints on public action and rules forsocial decisions", American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 1 &,September 1970, pp.Z.4777547

i

.

10. CPL Exchange.Bibliography #267

Burton, I., "Investment choipes inpUblic"resourced.nvestment"in The Prospect of Change: edited by A. Rotstein Toronto,"McGraw-Hill, 19651pp. l49173.

Chase, S.B.. (ed.), Problems insablic expenditure analyses:apers resentedafeliSetbeemr

1 -1 1566 lIashifigslicatitute,1968..

M.L., "Cost benefit analysis " Work Study and Nana ementService, Vol. 14, Julk 1970, pp. 7= O.

." 717.

Clough, D.J., "A multiagency decidion model framework for bene-fit-cost analysis", Canadian Operations Research Society!Journal, Vol. 7, No..3, November 1969; pp. 193-203.

..

. ,Davidson, P., "The valuation ok-public goods"; in Social Scien-

ces and the Euvironment? edited\byM.E. Garnsey' and J.R.;" Hibles, Boulder, University, of Colorado Press, 1967, pp.

125-164., f.

Eckstein, 0.1\"A Survey of the theory of,

puolic expenditure

1 ,

criteria,2, inPubiic Finances: Needs, Sources and Utiliza-Lion, edited:by M. Buchanan; Princeton, Prtnceton Univ-ersitypres's,.1964 pp. 439-504.

Fischer, D.V.1."The probiew of public investment bAteria - acritique," Engineering Economist, Vol. 151 No. 2, January-February 1970; pp. 123-128.

."ReSource a llocation and the public' sect6r,wYale Economic ESsays, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1967. pp, 45-98.

Fester, C.D., "Social welfare functions in costAilenefit analyrsis".0'in Operational Research and the Social Sciences, edit-

. ed by R..Lawrence,

Hamburg, h., "Statistical decision theory and benefit-boat.analysis for preferedness of choice among alternative pro-jdcts", in The Ps cholo of Management Decision, OVN.Gleer-up, Tund, Sweden, 15 7, pp. -60.

Haveman,tR.n., "Benefit-cost analysis: 4s relevance to publicinvestment decisions: comment ", quarterly Journal of I:con-.omicsVol. 81, No. 4, November 13.67715176017-7"

Hiribicks A.H. G.M. Taylor, Program Budgeting and Benefit-Cost Analysis. Cases, Tgxts and Readings, Pacific cTalisades1California, Goodyear Publishing Company, 1969. -

Hirshleifer, J., "On the theory of cptimal investment decisions",Journal of Political Economy, Vol.. 66, No. 41 August 1958,pp., 329-352.

11. "' CPL Exchange V..bliogSraphy.#267_

- iugessen, A.K., "Prioritips, No. 3: benefit-cost analysis",Industrial Canada, Vol. 70, No. 5, September 1969, p1). 17-19;.

McCullough, Cost Analysis for Planninj Pro&ramminm134dgeting Cost-Benefit Studies, Santa.Monica,ati on, 1966. .

liajor, D.C., 41Behefit-cost ratios for projects in multipleobjective' investment programs", Water. Resources Research,

,VO1.- 5, 6., December 1969, pp...3.3.7473

4" ."Cost ,benefit rules for poorer .countries",

'Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1, February 1971, ,FF:736413:774 , "Vhat is wrong with Roskill?",Journal of Trans-r 'port Economics and Policy, Vol. 4, No 34 September 1270, ae

pp. g21-234..

1 tiusgrcve,A., "Cost benefit, analysis and the theory of public..a

. finance"; Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 7, No. 3,. September 1969,, pp. 797-8C6.

or

Ne6nan, .gficieney and distribition in benefit -costanalysis", Mimeographed, Ann Arbor, 'University of Michigan,Deimptment of Economics, 1969.

. ..

Pearman, E.H., Bibliography on Cost-Benefit Analysis and Plan-ning- Programming- Budgeting, McLean, Virginia, ResearchAnalysis .Corporation; 1566. .. 4 1. . .

Peters., G.E., Cost Benefit Analysis & Public ',IL enditure, 2nd..ed., London, Institute rof Economic Affais, 19 .

, "Cost benefit analysis: illusion or godsend?",Statistician, Vol..185, September 18,, 1964, pp. 7Z-757.

Rasmussen, D., Benefit-tost versus the rate of return: an' analysis of investment criteria, St Louis, Washington .

.11niversity,- institute for Urban end" Regional Studies,

Working Paper CWR-10, October 1966.

C

Investment criteria: the relationship of benefit-cost and return analysis, St. Louis, WashingtonUniversity, Institute for Urban and Regional Studies,Working Paper CWR-L, June 1966:

Rigb P.H., Theory Rw Economic Anal sis for Business Management,- Columbia, Miseottri, University of Missouri'. School of Busi-

ness & Public Aamrnistration, Research Center, 1965.

.4*

.t..JN1

c

0"

12. CPT Exchange Bibliography #2670.'

Rothenberg, J., The Measurement of Social Welfare, EnglewoodCliffs, Prentice Hall, 1961.

Schwab, B. and P. Lusztig, "Comparative analyses of the netpresent value and the benefit cost-ratio as measures ofthe economic desirability of investments", Journal ofFinance, Vol. 24, No. 3, June 1969, pp. 507-51.

Self, P., "Ndnsense -onf'stilts": ,cdst benefit analysis and the

Roskill commission", Political QuerterlY, Voi. 41, No. 3;July/S 1970, Pp:249-260; Reply .with rejoinder by B.C.Fprdham, Vol. 42: No. 1,kJanuary 1971, pp.. 9t

Smith, B.L.R. ) "The concept of scientific choice: a brief'i

,review of the literature", American Behavioral Scientist,Vol.-, No. 95 May. 1966, pp. 27-1-36".-'

Smith,'D.T.y'qmprovement in the quality of the environment:costs and benefits", Tax Policy, Poi. 37, Nos. 3 -14, March-Apri1/1970, pp. 3-11.

Tax Foundation, P ,anning-Programming-Bud eting Systems and/Cost Benefit Anal sis in Government a biblio ra h New

York, Tax Foundation, 19.7. ,

9Thomas, B.A. and B.T. Bauer, Relative Precision of Cost and

Benefit Data, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press,1957. .

U.S., Bureau of the Budget Library, Cost-Benefit Analysis: ASelected Bibliography, Washington, Mimeographed paper ofthe Bureau of the Budget, May 1965,

Ward, J.T.,'The Systematic Evaluation of Development'Pro:ects,'Lincoln, N.Z., Lincoln College, 1964.

Weisbrod, B.A., "Concepts of costs and benefits" in Problems inPublic Expenditure Analysis, edited by S.B. Chase, Jr.Washington, Brookings Institution, 1968, pp. 257-262.

Wildaysky, A., "Political economy of efficiency: cost benefitanalysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting", PublicAdministration Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, December 1966, PP.292-310.

Williams, A., "Terminological and conceptual problems in cost-,/ benefit analysis", Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 21,

Special Conference Issue, 1970, pp. 37-39.


Young, D.B., Benefit Profile Analysis in Environmental Decision

Making, Ph.D.-Dissertation, Austin, Texas, The University olTexas at Austin, 1970.

(3) Discountin and Interest Rates

Arrow, K.J., "Criteria for social investment", Water ResourcesResearch, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1965, pp. 1-8.

3 "Discounting & public investment criteria", inWater Research, edited by A.V; Kneese'and S.C. Smith,,Baltimore, Johns Hopkins 1966, pp. 13-32.

1 and R.C. Lind, "Unceitainty and the value'of pub-lic investment decisions", American Economic Review, Vol.401 No. 3, June 1970, pp. 364747b.

Bauniol, W.J., "On the appropriate discount rate for evaluationof public projects", in Program. Budgeting. and Benefit-Cost

Analysis, by H.H. Hinrichs & G.M. Taylor, Pacifid Palisades,California, Goodyear Publishing Company, 1969, pp. 202-211.

, "On the social rate of discount", American Econo-mic Review, Vol. 58, No. 4, September 1968175777.7862.

Davisson, W.I., "Public investment criteria",Vol. 40, No. 2, May 1964, pp. 153-162.

Feldstein, M.S., "The social time preferencecost benefit analysis ";, Economid Journal,

'June 1964, PP. 360-379.

Land Economics,

discount rate-inVol. 74, No.

Harberger, A.C., "The interest rate imcost-benefit analysis",

irkaarsSubny...22nell-conmittee on Fiscal Policy of the Con ess of the UnitedgIVIST715th Congress, 1st Sess on, 19 7 Government Print-ing Office,)Vdshington, U.S.,'1957,pp. 239-241.

Kubinski, Z.M., and C.A. Wilkins, "The marginal efficiency ofcapital and, the effect of the discounting period", EconomicRecord, Vol. 36, ao. 75, August 1964 pp. 424-425.

Lind, R.C., "The Social rate of discount and the optimal rateof Investment: further Comment", Quarterly Journal of .

Economics, Vol. 78; No. 2, May 1967,pThT.W

r--

14. CPL 'Exchange Bibliography #267

Marglin, S.A., "The social rate. of discount and the optimalrate of investment", Quarterly Journal of Economics)

if Vol. 77, Po. 1, FebruliT57675:75755:ril7---------

W.L., "The magnitude of the discount rate for govern-ment projects") Southern Economic Journal), Vol. 28, Ho. 4)April 1962, PP. 348-356,

Robichek, A.A., and D.C. Myers) "Conceptual problems in thbuse .of risk-adjusted discount rates") Journal of Finance,'Vol:.211 No. 4) December 1966, pp. 727-730. 4

Staats..E.B04 "Survey of use by federal agencies of the dis-counting technique in evaluating future programs ", inProgram Budgeting and Benefit=Cost Analysis, by H.H. Hin-richs and G.M. Taylor, Pacific Palisades, California, Good-%year Publishing Company, 1969, pp. 212-228.

.

Stockfisch, J.A., "TheAinterest rate, applicable tomgspreriunentinvestment projects," in Piidetizgg_Igd-Ber.t-Cost'oramBtan,Analysis) by H.H. Hinrichs and G.M. Taylor, Pacific Pali-

o sales, California, Goodyear PUblishing Company, 1969, pp.187-201.

Tullock, G., "The social rate of discount and the optimal rateof investment: comment", Quarterly Journal of Ecellnmics,Vol. 78, Ho. 2, Nay 164, pp. 331-336:

U.S. Congresdbnal Joint EoonomicCommittee, Sub-Committee onEconony in Government,' Interest Rate Guidelines for FederalDecision-Making: Hearing, January 29, 1968, Vaabington,U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.

Walters, .A.) "Note bn.cthe

choide of interest rates in cdst-benefit analysis", Eonomica)'.Vol. 37, No. 145, February

0 1970, pp. 78-80.' .

5(4) Further Considerations

s

Externalities

Coase) RS., The problem of social cost", Journal of Law andEconomics, Vol. 3, October 1960, pp. 1-44.

Davis) O.A., and A.Ift, Nhinston, "Some notes" on equating pri-vate and social cost") Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 32,Po. 2, October 1965, pp. 113.4126.

Margolis) J., "Secondary benefits) external economics land thbjustification of public investment," Revieu of Economicsand Statistics, Vol. 39, No.' 3$ August 1957, pp. 284-291.

'44

1S. CPL Exchange Bibliography #267

Solo, "Benefit-cost analysis and externalities in pri-vate choice: comment",Southern Ecbnomic Journal, Vol. 34)No. 4, April 1968, pp. 563:570.

Veisbrod, B4;., "Income redistribution effects arid benefit costanalysis", in, Problems in Publicenditure Analysis, edi-ted by S.B. Chase, Vashington, Brookings Institution, 1968,pp. 117-222.

Intangibles

Brookings Institution, Can Benefits and Costs of Public Invest-. ' ments Be Measured? Brookings Research Report No. 32,'Iash-

ington, D.C., Brookihgs Institution, 1965.

Devine, The treatment of incemmensu rables in cost-bene-fit analysis", Land Economics, Vol. 42, P1o. 3, August 1966,PP. 383-387, "Reply") by J:E. Brandi, Vol. 44, No. 4,

,

November 1968, pp..523-525.

Opport unity Costs

Byerley, "Cost benefit analysis: discount rate andopportunity costs", Canadian Tax Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1,

' 'January-February 1970, pp. 58-66.

Feldstein, M.S., "Opportunity cost -calculations in cost-benefitanalysis", Public Finance, Vol. 19, No. 2', 1964: PP.'117-139.

flarglin, S.A., The opportunity cost of public investment" ,

Quarterly Journal of 'Economics, Vol,. 77, No. 4May 1963,pp. 271 -289.

2. Cost Effectiveness

(1) Introduction

Alchian, A.A., "Cost- effectiveness of cost-effectivenns", inpeferge....lianapet, edited by S. Enke, Englewood Cliffs,'Prentice Hall, 1967, pp. 74-66.

Bell, C.F., Cost-Effectiveness Analyses as a Mans ement Tool,Santa Monica, California, Rand Corporation, 19 4.

"Cost effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses; session re-port", .(with abstract of papers). Operational ResearchQuarterl 1 (Special Conference Issue), Vol..21, June 1970,

PP. 37- .

4 L'1

\

z.

16. cpi, Exchalige Bibliography '267

English, J.M. (ed.), Cost' effectiveness; York, John Wiley,1968.

0

Fields, D.S., "Cost/effectiveness analysis,.0.

its tasks and. their interrdiatioe, Operations Research, Vol.' 14, No. 3,

4 May-June 1966; pp. 515-527.

Goldmat T.A., (ed.), Cost Effectiveness Analysis:' New A ro-- 'aches in Dedision:Naldng, New York,?Frederick A. Praeger,

1967,

Grodse, R.N., An Introduction to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis,McLean; Research Analysis C657,131575757.

0,'.

-..

$ Principles of Cost - Effectiveness!Analysis, Wash=ington, D.C., U.S. Industrial College of the Armed Forces,publication No. 266 -214, 1966.

P , ...

Helmer, 0., The. Application of Cost..:Effectivenes6 to Non-Military Government Problems, SantaMonica, California,

''Rand Corporation, September 1966;.

.

!

4.

.

Heymont, 1.0., H.L. Bryk and'J. Surmeir, Guide for-reviewersof, studies containing cost-effectiveness analysis, McLean;Research Analyses Compration, 19\\.

Jakobsberg, VI., "Cost effectiveness; what it is and how to useit", Nanagement Review, Vol. 55, No. 6, June 1966, pp. 35.-(t43.

King) B.G., "Cost effectiveness analysis: innlications for'accountants",.Journal of'Accountaltt, Vcl. 129, No. 3,March4970, pp. 43-0.

Peterson, R.L., "The use and misuse of Cost effectiveness,"

Air University Review, Vol. 26, December 1966, pp. 243 -292.

Quade, E.g., Cost Effectiveness: an Introduction and Over-view, Santa Monica, Caiifor a, Rand Corporation, My '65.

Seiler, K., Introduction to Systems Cost-Effectiveness. NewYork, Wiley-Interscience, 1969.

Watson, R.D., l! Systems-Approach to Investigate the OptimumCost-Effectiveness of a Generalized Management InformationSystem, kh.D. Dissertation, Norman, The University dfOklahoma, 1970.

Wright, LD.C., "A comparison between cost-effectiveness andthreshold analysis", Journal of the Town Plannin Institute,Vol. 56, No. 4, April 1970, pp. 1 9-1 0.

17. CPL 'Exchange Bibliography #267

Yewdall, G.A., "Cost-effective operational.research", (ab-stracts of ORS conference p4efs), Operational ResearchQuarterly, Vol. 20 Special Conference Issue, April 1969,pp. 23-24.

(2) Applications

Dodson, E.N., nost effectiveness in urban transportation',Operations Research, Vol. 17, No. 3; May, June 1969, pp. -

373 -394..

Dudek, C.1;:;and W:11. hcCasland, Cost-effectiveness analysis,of, free4aY. ramp' control, College Station, Texas, Texas

' Transpor ation Institute, 1969.,.

.

,

HaMburgl FeG., "Training exercise oh cost-effectivenessevaluatioh of air pollution,control strategies", Journal.,of Air Pollution, Vol. 21, No. 22. 1971, p. 66+.

A

Little (Arthur D.) Inc., Cost effectiveness in traffic safe-ty, New York, F.A. PraTOTTI3PT77--- : .

Musgrave, R.A., et. al., "COst effectiveness of alternativeincome maintenance schemes", NationalTax Journal, Vol.23, No. 2, June 1970, pp. 314073.67-7-7---

Neufville, R. de,, "Cost-effectiveness analyses ofcivilengineering systems: New York City's primary water supp130.OperationsBesearch, Vol. 18, No. 5, September- October, 1970,PP. 785-804: 8

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develppment,. Committeefor Scientific and Technical Personnel, Budgeting, ProgrammeAnalysis,and Cost Effectiveness in Educational plapAna,OECD, 1968.

Robinson, K.L., "Cost and effectiveness in recent governmentland retirement programs in the United States", Journal ofFarm Economics, Vol. 48, No., 1, February 1966, pp. 22-30.

Saves, E.S., ,"Simulation and cost- effectiveness analysis ofNew York's emergency ambulance service", Nianaeremioe,Vol. 15, No. 12, August 1969, pp. B608-B627.

Smith, W.F., "Cost effectiveness an cost benefit analyses forpublic health programs", Public alth Reports, Vol. 83, No.11, November 1968, pp. 899-9

1'

(1)

.1


Stade,-K., "Cost effectiveness of water bombers in forest firecontrol", Canadian O'erational Research Societ Journal,Vol. 5, Noi 1,, March 19 7, pp. 1-1 .

Teitz, N.B., "Cost effectiveness: a systems approach to ana-lyses of urban'servips", Journal of the American, Instituteof Flenners, Vol. 341, No. 5, September 1968, pp. 303-311.

Temkin, S., l::Co,LtivenessE.luati2:2.Apzroact: to Impro-ving Resource AllocationS for School sukmo, Ph.D. Dis-sertation, Philadelphiap'University of Pennsylvania', 1969.

Warfoed, J.J.1 The South Atcham Scheme: an'Economic"A rai-sslEeport submitted to he Minister of Housing and localGovernment, H.ESO, 1969; London.

B. APPLICATIONS

1. Regionaii)lanninp and Resources_Bana ement

Evaluation of Pro rams and Projects'

/ sArmstrong, G.T. and I.J. Freyman,- Cost Benef

Lead Zinc Smelter in the Northwest Territories, Edonomic ,

Staff Group, Development Branch, Department of Indian.Affaii6 and Northern Development, Ottawa, Queeds Printer,1969. ,

Brookings InstitutiOn) Applying Cost Benefit Analysis to Pub-lic.Programs, Brookings Research Report No. 79, Ishington,D.C.., Brookings Institution, 1968:

Brooks, D.B., "Strip mine reclamation and economic analysis",;,Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, January 1966,pp. 13-44.

Carlin, A., "Grand Canyon controversy: lessons for federalcost-benefit practices", Land Economics, Vol. 44, No. 2,May 1968, pp. 219-227.

Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., Resource Conservation Economics andPolicies, Revs ed., Berkeley, University of California atDivision of Agriculture Sciencps, Agricultural ExperimentalStation, 1963, pp. 230-250. -

Davis, L.S., and W.R. Bentley, "The Separation of facts andvalues in resource policy analysis ", Journal of Forestry,Vol 65, No: 9, September 1967, pp. 612-620.

1"

19. CPL exchange Bibliography,#267

De Alessi, L., "Implications of property rights for governmentinvestment choices", American Economic Review, .Vol. 59, No.1,. March 1969, pp.

.

Dorfmahl R., (ed.), Measuring Benefits of GovernMent Invest-ments, Washington, Brookings Institutioi7iNT.

Eckstainn Q., "Efficiendy in government expendtpires", in.

Public Finance, Englewood Cliffs-, Prentice -Hall, 1964, pp.N5-7R.

Institute of Municipal Treasure4= and Accountants, Cost Bene-fit Lnalysis in Lobal Government London, ;MM., 1969. e

JaCkson, 142., Determination of Regional Air Pollution Con-tr'ol Costs. Ph.D. Dissertation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Drexel Institute of Technology, 1970. ,

Euthoo, M.K.5 "Renewable.resource planningproblem with,special' reference to Kashmir", Socio-Economic PlanningSciences, Vol. 4,'116. 2, June 1970, pp. 187-200.

Nelson, B.L., "Costs and benefits of regulating communica-tions", American Economic Review: Papers a Proceedings,

-Vol. 61, No. 2, May 1971,7.dp21-2T5723.7234.1:

Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development, Develop-merit Centro, 14.anu4ofIndustrianalysisinDeveloping Countries: V.1. Methodology & case studies1968 (2 pts) v.2. Social cost benefit analysis, by Ipnifl.D. Little & J.L. Mirlees, 1969.

Peters, G.H., "Land use studies in Britain: a review atheliterature with special reference to applications of costbenefit analysis", Journal of A icultural Economics Vol.,21, May 1970, pp. 171-21 .

U.S. Senate, Committee on Government operations, Sub-committ-, ee on intergovernmental =lotions, Criteria for Evaluation

Planning State and by H.P.Hatry, Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1567,

Weinrich, J.E., "StrategiaboSt benefit factors in envirbn-.mental performance", Public Utilities Fortnightly, Vol. 81,February 15, 1968, pp. 32-38,

(2)

20. CPL Exchange Litliogesphy #267'1/

Regional Development

Burns, L.S., "Cost benefit analysis of a social overhead pro-ject for regional development", Regional Science Associa-tion 19 , Philadelphia,University'of Pennsylvania, Department of Regional Science,Wharton School: 1966, pp. 155-161.

Eckstein, 0., "Benefit-cost analysis and regional development":in Re 'onal Economic.Plannin 'Techni ues of Anal sis:edited by W. Isard and J.H. Cumberland, Paris, Orga 'za-tion for Economic CotOperation and Development, 1960,App.359-368._

Fischer, D.ii..,_"Relevance of benefit cost analysis for econo.rmic development", Engineering economist, Vol. 15, No. 2,January- February 1970, pp. 63-80.

Gallaway, L.E., "An economic analysis ofpublic policy TOrdepressed areas", Industrial and Labor Retations 'Review,Vo1:°15, No. h,

Hale, C.W.,'"Optimality of' local subsidies in regional dev-elopment programs", Quarterly RevisuSIcal2mics andBusiness, Vol.,9 No. 5 Autumn 1.969: )RP. 35-50: "Replywith rejoinder ", J.R. Rinehart, and W.E. Laird, Vol. 10,No. 3, Autumn 1970, pp. 1:1-49.

Krutilla: J.V., "Criteria foi; evaluating regional developmentprograms", American Economic Review: Vol. 45, No. 2: May1955, pp. 120-132.

Narglin, S.A., Public Investment Criteria: Benefit-Cost'Anal rsis for Planned Economic Growth, CaMbridge:. NIT PreSs,19 7.

SPeston, M.H., and R. Rees, Feasibility-Study of a Cost Bne-

fit Assessment of Maritime Industrial Develonment Areas,London, National Ports Council, 1970. ,

Pincus, J., R_Cosiderationof'UAdeuacyathe Rated ofDeveloping ,Costs &

Benefits of Aid: a Quantitative A roach, New York,Trade & Development Board, Committee on invisiblesfinancing related to trade, 1967.

(3) Rural and Agriculture

Diehl, W.D., "Farm- nonfarm migration in the Southeast: acost returns analysis", Journal of Farm Economics, Vol.18, No. 1, February 1966, pp. 1-11.

,


Fitchett, D.A., LnvestneriPeruvian Ard.cul-. tune: Some Recent " eriences in Develo ment Plannin

Sa to Monica, California, Rand Corporation, June 196

Hansen, N.M:, "Some neglected' factors in American regionaldevelopment policy: the case of Appalachia", Land Econo-mics, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 1966, pp. 1-9.

e

t

Horton, D.C., ii,%liaIuating the costs and benefits of past farm'programs", Conference on Policies Affecti Rural Peo le,Raleigh, 19 , Papers.' Raleigh, Agricultural Policy Insti-tute, North Carolina State University, and .the Center forAgricultural & Economic Development, Iowa State. University,1966, pp. 51-57.

Maddox, J.G., "Private and social costs of the movement ofpeople out of agriculture", American Economic Review,Papers & Proceedings, Vol. 50, No. 2, May 1960, pp. 392-402.

Mathew, M.P., The Economics of Rubber Plantations in India:i2L.tCoaBerJazlsstArts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Montreal,

0 McGill Univ_ersity, 1969.

"Singh, St, A benefit cost anal sis of resettlement in theGazelle peninsula, Canberra, Australian National Univer-sity Press;7057:

.

Western Agricultural Economics Research Council, Benefit-Cost Analysis, Report 1o. 3, Berkeley, Western Agricul-ture Economics Research Council, 1959.

Williamson, J.C., "Costs and benefits of past agriculturalprograms", Conference on Policies Affectin Rural Pe 'le,Raleigh, 1965-Papers, Agr culturarPolicy Insti-tute, North Carolina State University, and the, Center for

Agriculture]: and Economic Development, Iowa State Univer-sity, 1966, pp. 29 -19.

(1.) Fisheries and Marine Resources

Brown, LG., A. Singh, and E.N. Castle, An Economic Evalua-tionefAheCleson Salmon and Steelhead ort Fishery,Corvallis, Oregon State University, September 19

Crutchfield, J.A., et. al., "Benefit-cost analysis and- theNational Oceanographic program", Natural Resource& Jour-nal, Vol. 7, No. 3, July 1967, pp. 3617375.

r 0")-)-e.,

(5)


Crutchfield, J.A., "Valuation of fishery esources"., LandEcOnomics, Vol. 38', No: 2, Nay 1962, pp. 145-154.

Harts, 11.3., and 17.11.D. Sewell, "The applicatiol.of benefit-,cost analysis to fish preservation expendituteq; a neg-lected aspect of river basin investment decisions", Land'Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1, February 1959, pp.. 48-55.

Sewell, W.R.D., and M.73. Marts, "The Nez Perce Dam and thevalue of a fishery", Land Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3, Aug- _

ust 1961, pp. 257-260.

Solo, R., "A critical evaluation of the National Academy ofSciences' cost benefit analyses for oceanographit research",Land Economics, Vol. 42, fro. 1, November 1966, pp-., 527-531.

Energy

Jones, G.K., "Cost- benefit analysis'of choice between nu-clear and other fuels", Operational: Research Quarterly,Vol. 21, Special Conference Issue, 1970, pp. 4.0.-44..,

(

MacAvay, P.W., "Effectiveness of the'Federal.power commis-sion", Bell Journal*of Economics & Management Science,Vol. 1, No. 2, Autumn 1970, pp. 271-303.

, and D.F. Peterson, Large-scale desalting; a study.in the_ engineering 4

economics of regional development, NewYork, Praeger,'1969.

Slesinge, R.E., "Cost analysis approach to utility ratemaking", Public Utilities Fortnightly, Vol.'86, pp. 26-31,SeptemberT4TI970.

Turvey, R.; "On investment choices in electricity genera-tion", Oxford Economic Pspers, Vol. 15, No. 3, November1963, 1:17-71B=M6.

Van Der Tak, H.G., The Economic/Choice between Hydro-Electricand Thermal Development, World Bank Staff Occasional PaperNo. 1, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins for the International Bankfor Reconstruction and Dev lopment, 1966.

2. Urban

"(1) Urban Planning

Hamburg, M., and T.. Langford, Selected Methods of Analysisfor Urban 3conomic Planning and Development in Pennsylvan-ia, Harrisburg, ComMonwealth of Pennsylvania, Departmentof Internal Affairs', 1964.

CPL Exchange Bibliography #267

Lamstein, J.H., et. al., ',,Efficienpy of investhentsin the A.innercity", Industrial Management' Review, Vol. 11, nter1970, pp. 77-90.

Lean, W., "Economic studies and.assetmen of town develop-ment", Journal of the Town Planning Institute, V91., 53,No. 4, April 1967, pp. 148;t152:

Lee, Robert Rue, Local government publickdidecision mak-ice. Stanford California, Project on EngineeringlEconOmicPlanning; Stanford University, 1964'.

Lichfield, N., "Cost-benefit analysis in city-planning",Journal of American Institute. of Plannara, Vol. 26, No. 4,----TiNoveEeFrc60.o. pp. 273-279.

-, Cost Benefit Analysis in Town Planninv a CaseStudy of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire and Isle ofEly County Council, 1966.

"Cost benefit analysis in planning evaluation",,Town Planning Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, July-l964, pp. 159-7169.

, Cost Benefit Analysis in Urban Development, Berke-ley, University of California; Institute of Busigass and,T.conomicResearch, Real.Estate Research Program, 1962.

and, H. Chapman, "Cost benefit analysis in urbanexpansion: a case study, Ipswickw, Urban Studies, Vol. 7,No: 2, June 1970, pp. 153-188.

Lichfield,. N., "Cost benefit in urban expansion: A casestudy: Peterborough", Regional Studies, Vol. 3,. No. 2,

.

SepteMber 1969, pp. 123L155.

Shoup, D.C., AdvariceLandAcisitioxi n,Connecticut,A Cost Benefit Analysis, Ph.D. Disgertation, NeleHaven,Connecticut, Yale University, 1968.

"7,ffects of sUboptiti2ation on urban governmentdecision making ", (with reply by J.F. Direl), Journal of -

Finance, Vol. 26, No. 2, Hay 1971, pp. 547L564, 579-580.

-1

Wells, J.C., "The Israeli moahav in Nigeria:- estimate ofreturni", Journal of Fain Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, May '

1966, pp. 279-294.. /

AMINEMERNIMMilW roll.11.11

21g. CPL Exchange, Pz1b.1tography,#261

(2): Urban Rerelnzimatt HousingBurns, L.S., Cast Benefit Analysis of Improved Housing: A_

Case Study, Los Angeles, University of C"alifarnia, GraduateSchool of Business Administration, 1956.

Dairis, 0.A. and LB. Wh.f.nqton, "conomic problems in. u.Kbanrenewal", in Private Iiants and Public, Needs: Issues Sur-rounding:the Size and 'Scope of Government Expenditures,edited by E.S. Phelps, Ne`w York, 11.U. Norton,7.9E57i717.146-153.

4

.Davis, 0.A., "A pure theory of urban renewal", Land' Economics,36, No. 2, May 1960, ,pp. 220-226,.:

Ford, E.J ., Benefit 'Cost Analp..is and. Urban Renewal in the'lest End Boston, Ph.D. Dissertation, Chestnut Hill,

. Massachusetts, BOston-College, 1971.tKtlnhofer, G.J., "Slum clearance -,its costs and benefits",-.

Termeiseei Planner,: Volt 15, April 1955, pp. 153-158.

Richfield, li. "Cost benefit analysis in urban redevelopmenta case study: Sw anley" Regional _Science AssociatiPapers. Ein2opeCojsI CracowanUniversity of Pennsylvania; Department of Regional Science,Vhfrton School, 1966, pp. 129-153. .

-"Evaluation of capital investment projects intown centre. redevelopment", Public Administration, Vol..45, No. 2, Summer 19671 pp. 1.1971-1 7.

A

Mao, "Efficiency in public urban renewal expenditures'.through benefit cost 'analysis", Journal of the American ,

Institute of Planners,Vol: 323 No. 2, March 1966, pp.107.

Messner, S.D., A Benefit Cost Analysis of Urban Redevelopment:a Case Study of the Indianapolis Pro ram, Bloomington,Indiana University, Graduate School' of. Business,' pureau. ofBusiness Reseamh, 1967.

Ross, I). "PropOsed methodology for comparing federally,'assisted houSing programs", American Economic Review,Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 57, No. 20 Nay 1967, pp. 91-100.

. ,`Rathenber.g, Econbmit7valuation of Urban Renewal: Concep-tual Foundation of Benefit -Cost AnalygiS y Vashington, D.C.

-ngs Institution, 1967.

t

)

Rl

ti

C .

25. 'CPL Exchange Bibliography #267

Schaff, A.R., "Public policies in urban renewal: ameconomic,analysis of justifications and effects% Land EcOnomicsVol. 40, No. 1, February 19641 pp, 67-78. ,

A

11Sims,,K.O., A:1....3ValUati8n0fOOSt4n.d.S.A1-tedtlino

0the-Proposed Urban Rede/elopment of .the_ Platte River Valley,Unpublished Ph.D.Oissertation, Boulder, University ofColorado, August 1966t.

2

:(3) Services

Berkley, G., "Municipal garages in Boston: a cost benefit

analysis", Traffic, Quarterly, Vol. 19, April 19651 pp..213-228..

.06tr

Choy, R.K.H., The oduction & Cost of a Free Urban PublicService: Reso , e Allocation in the'Oakland Public Lib-rary. ranch Service: Ph.T..Dissertation, Berkeley, Univ-ersityVof California, 1970.

.

Coyle, R.G. and.M.J.C. Martin,'Nase study: the costminimization:pf refuse collection-pperations" (with replyblr B. Whitworth)'. 'Operational Research Quarterly, Special

'conference Issue, vol,. 20, April 1969, PR. 43-57

411er, J.E., "Program budgeting and cost benefit analysis inlibraries", College and Research Libraries, Vol. 36,' No.2; March 1960; pp. 156=60,

/

`).U.S. Advisory CoMmd.ssiOrcdt Inter - governmental Relations,"Costa' and:benefits of metropolitan wide servicesll, in.

jleismolltan SOcital and Economic Di6p2rities:for' Intergovernmental Relations inTentral,Cities

- and Suburbs, WashingtonV-61t Government Printing Office,1965,° Report A-25;.pp.

lj.6. Advisory. Commission onaIntergovernmental Relations,"Use of Cost-benefit studies in aflocdting costs for area-wide services", in Metropolitan Social and Economic Dis-aritie'g: I '.lications for Intertovernmental Relations in

Central Cities nd Suburbs; Washington, U.S. Government ,

Printing Office, 19 Report A.-25; pp. 129-131.

0

a

-L


3. Transportation

(1) Transport Planning

Bruck, H.V., et. al., "Evaluation of alternative transporta-tion proposals; the Northwest Corridor", Journal of theAmerican Institute of Planners, Vol. 32, No. 67411(717;r1966, pp. 322-333.

Crumlish, J.D., Notes on the State-of-the-Art of Benefit CostAnalysis as Related to'Trans ortation Systems, Washington,U.S. Government Printing Office, 19 .

Foster, C.D., The Tramp ort Problem, London, Blackie and Son,1963.

Kuhn, T.E., Public Enterprise Economics and Traria ort Prob-, lems, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1962.

Lichfield, N., et. al.,; Stevenage: cost benefit analysisof private transportresort, 2 Vols., Stevenage Development Corporation, Bert,19o9.

,Ncyer, J.R., J.K. Kain and M. Wohl, The &ban Trans ortationProblem, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 19 .

NevaAri. V.C., "Equity in cost-benefit analysis", Journal ofTransport Economics and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, September1970, 235-254.

,Smerk, G.M., Urban Teen okation: The Federal Role, Bloom-ington, Indiana University Press, 196 1 pp. 23 -264.

Witheford, D.K., and Ddscription4Cost, Analysis Procedures, Pittsburgh Area Transportation_Study, 1962, Technical Paper No. 32.

(2) Air

Enke, S., "povernment-industry deve.lopment commercialsupersonicsupersonic transport") American EconomIllelewlpazaliPr:ocaelcsns, Vol. 57, N377-ilag 1967, pp. 71-79.

OtDonoghue, M., 01.1bost benefit evaluation of Irish airlines',Journal of the Statistical and Social:Inuiry Societ ofIreland, Vol._ 22, Paxt 1, 196 -19 9, it. 1 -1.0.

,

Ody, J.G., "Applications of cost-benefitanalysis to air-ports: the -case of gicosia, Cyprus", Journal of TransportEconomics and Policy;- Vol. 3, No. 3,. September 1969, pp.322-332.


(3) Highways

Agnello, R.J" Thd Secact_Chece Bay Bridge: I, Cost

HiHighway Investment,Benefit Study in Ph.D.-Disseikb-ation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University, 1570. :

American Associationof State Highway Officials, Committee on "

Planning and Design Policies, Road User Benefit AnalysisforLILanylmteoioven-t Washington, D.C.,1960.

Evans, H.K., "Economic studies for highways ", Traffic Quarter-ly, Vol. 22, No. 4, October 1968, pp. 479-495.'

Gillhespy, N.R., "The Tay toad bridge (Scotland): a casestudy in cost benefit analysis" Scottish Journal ofPolitical Economy, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 1968, pp. 167-183.

Kafoglis, M.Z.1 ",Highway policy and external economies ",National Tax Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, March 1963, pp. 68-80.

4

Miller, F., "Highways and economic development", En ineerinEconomist, Vol. 15, No. 3, Spring 1970,,pp. 17 -1 .

National Research Council, Highway Research Board, Highway.Finance and Benefits, Four Reports, Washington, D:C61966.

Smith, 1.; "The Western Nigeria road development survey: acase study in pre-investment analysis in developing coun-tries",, Journal of Transport Economics'(!: Policy, Vol. 2,Np. 1, January'1968, pp. 94-71557-7-

r

Van der T k, N.G., and J. de Reappraisal of a RoadProject Ira., World Bank Staff Occasional Paper, No.7, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Pr., 1969.

(4) Navigation

Nupp, B., A Policy SIL2121[119Aylilaterway User Charges,. Unpublished Master's thesis, Washington, American Univer-sity, May 1960.

Renshaw, E.F., "A note on the measurement of the benefitsfroth public investment in navigation projects", AmericanEconomic Review, Vol. 47, No. 5, September 1957, pp. 652-E62.

Singh, B. and S.D. Misra; Benefit cost anal-sis of the SardaCanal System, New York, Asia Publishing House, 19 .

1.

(5)

28. CPL Exchange BibliographY4267

Stratton, A., and 17.E. Silver.; "Operational research and costbenefit analysis on navigation with particular referenceto marine accidents", Journal of the Institute of Naviga-tion, Vol. 23, Issue 3, 1970, p. 324.

Von Dohlen, G.N., The Investment Decision Makinthe Port of New York Authority:

t-j

Process ofa Benefit Cost Study,

Ph.D. Dissertation, New York, Columbia University, 1970.

Railroads

Else, P.K. and M. Howe, "Cost benefit analysis and the with-drawl of railway services", Journal of Trame ort Economicsand Policy, Vol. 3, No. 2, May 19 9, pp. 17 -19 .

'Foster, C.D. and M.E. Beesley, "Estimating the-joeial benefitof constructing an underground railway in London",Journal of the Ro al Statistical Society, Vol; 125, part '

1903, - .

Great Britain, Ministry of Transport, The Cambrian Coast Line:a Cost-Benefit Anal sis'of the Retention of Railway Sar-vices on the Cambriaa Coast Line MacLondon, HMSO 19.9.

Knowles, "Economics .of branch line railway operation inQueensland", Economic Record, Vol. 451 No. 112, December1969, pp. 563-577.

L. Human Resources

(1) Education

Cochrane, D., "Cost of university education", Economic Re-' cord, Vol. 44, No. 107, June 1968, pp. 1374.757-

Colbourne, R.A., A Study to Determine the I plicability ofCost- Beiaefit Analysis to .a Long -Range Secondary SchoolPlant Program, Ph.D. Dissertation, New York, ColumbiaUniversity 1970.

Gisser, N. "On cost-benefit analysis of investment inschooling in rural farm areas", American Journal'of Agri-cultural Economics; Vol..50, No. 3, August 1968, pp. 621-629.

Hirsch, W.Z. and N.J. Marcus, "Some benefit cost considera-tions of universal junior college education", National TaxJournal, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 1966, pp. 48-57.


Hirsch, W.Z., et. al., s2111522rs of Public Education Costsand Benefits, Los Angeles, University of California,Institute of Government and Public Affairs, 1964.

Selby, Smith, C., "Costs and benefits in further educatiOn:/1 some evidence frcm a pilot study", Economic Journal, Vol.

80, No. 319, September 1970, PP. 583-604.

Wiseman, J., "Cost-benefit analyses in education", SouthernEconomic Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, part2, July 1.965, sup-plement, pp. 1 ;14...

Woodhall, M., Cost Benefit Analysis in Educational Planning,:Paris, UNESCO, International Lytituti for EducationarPlanning, 197D.

(2) amploymentand training ."

Bateman, U., "An application of cost benefit analysis to theUerk-Experience Program", American Economic Review:'a 6rsecTroceedinO, Vol. 57, No. 2, May 19 7, pp. 0-90.

Borus, N.E., "A benefit-cost analylis of the economic effec-tiveness of retraining the unemployed ", Yale EconomicEssays, Vol4) No. 2, Fall 1964, pp. 05:429.

Canada, Department of Manpower and Immigration, Program Dev-elopment Service, Research Branch, Aj1.22.2213ER1Islfor Policy and Research - Cost-Benefit Analysis, Ottawa,

ey, R.V.,,"Benefit cost analysis of the vocational rehab-ilitation program ", Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 4, No.2, Spring 1969, pp. 72672327--

°

educa-tion:

A.J.1 "The decision to invest in vocational educa-tion: an analysis of cost and benefits", Journal of HumanResources, )1161. 3,'supplement 1968, pp. 88-120.

Hardin, E'. and M. Borus Economic Benefits and Costs of Re-training, Lexington, Massachusetts, Beath Lexington Books,1971.

Haveman, R.H., and J. KrutiIla, "Unemployment, 'excess capac-ity, and benefit-cost investment criteria", Review ofEconomies and Statistics, Vol. 49, No. 3, AUgust-1967, pp.%2-392.

. Une7royment2 Idle Capacity and the evaluationof Public_Expenditures: National and regional Analysis;"with the assistance of R.M. Steinberg, Baltimore, JohnsHopkins, 1968.

fe

ss

'30. CPL Exchange Bibliogr tls, #267

Hettenhou6e, G.W., "CosOenefit analysis of executive com-perisation", Harvard Business Review, Vol: 48; No. 4, July-August

"Marginal analysis of the benefit -cost relation-ships of executive compensation plans", Journal of Finance,Vol. 25,,10, 5, De4mber 1970, (pp..1177.

74

Industrial Relations Asociati*.17th.Chidago, 1964: Proceed-ims Manpower and Welfare Benefit Cost: Anal, els,Madison, Wiscon.tin, Industrial Relations Association, 19pp. 171-214.

,

) *-Judy,..R.14., "Costs: theoretical and methodological issues'!,in Cost-Benefit Analysis of Nanpowbr Pdlicieal Proceedingsof a North Americen,Conference, llay-14-7S71691 edited byG. G. Gomers &W. D. Wood, Kingston, Ontario, Queens Unikr-ersity,Industrial Relations Centre, 1969, pp. 16-29.

Levine, A.S.,.."Cost benefit analysis of the work experienceprogram", 14elfare in Review, Vo1.44, August-September 1966,pp. 1-9.

New York (State) Department of Labor, Evaluation & BenefitCost 'Relationships of Manpower Training Programs in NewYork State, Albany, 1967.

Sewell, D.O., A Benefit 'Cost Analysis of Manpower Programs inthe U.S. Antipoverty Program, Kingston, Ontario, Queen'sUnivrsity, Industrial Relations Centre, 1971.

"A critique of cost benefit, analyses of trainingMonthly Labor Review, Vol. 90, 'No. 9, September 1967, pp.E5-51.

Smith, A.D., "Active manpower and redundancy policiesi theircosts and benefits", International Labour Review, Vol. 95,Nos. 1-2, January-February 1967, pp. 49-60.

Somers, G.G., and W.D. Wood, Cost Benefit Analysis of Man-power Policies, Kingston, Ontario, Queen's University,Industrial Relations Centre, 1969.

Strang, A. and F. Idle t ngham, A Proposed Methodology forCost-Beneei.talsisiAnrnmentSonsoredTrainin-inIndustry, Toronto. Ontario, Department of Labour, ResearchBranch, 1970.

AWood, V., and H.F. Cagpbell, Cost Benefit Analysis anti the

Economics of Investment in Human Resources: an AnnotatedBibliography, Kingston, Ontario,..Queen's University, Indus-trial Relations Centre, 1970.

31. CPL Exchange Biaiography #267

Ziderman, A., "Costs ! benefits of adult retraining in theUnited Kingdom", Economica: Vol. 36, November 1969, pp.'363-371.

(3) Health a welfare

Diamond, D.S., et. al., A cost.benefit analysis of the NITfacuL_tylealtreyprogram, Cambridge, Nassachusetts,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1969.

Leibstein, H., "Pitfalls in benefit -cost analysis of birthprevention", Population Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, July1969, pp. 161-170.

Levine, L.3., "Cost benefit analysis and social welfare",Welfare in Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, Febrdary 1566, pp. 1-11.

, "Cost benefit analysis and social welfare pro-gram evaluation", Social Service Review, Vol. 42, No. 2,June 1968, pp. 173-163.

Marshall, Cost Benefit Analysis in Health, Santa Monica,Rand Corporation, 1965.

Perlman,. N., On health and economic development: some prob-lems, methods and conclusions reviewed in a perusal of theliterature ", Comparative Studies in Society and History,Vol. 8, No. ,477MI7777570).743E7-

Prahad, K., The sterilization debate? Cost benefit analysisis necessary", and R.S. Dheer, "Emphasise motivation, notmeans", in Economic Weer (India), Vol. 16, September 12,1964, pp. 1501+.

Seccombe, E.W.C., "The appraisal of health service projectsusing benefit-cost analysis", World Hospitals, Vol. 6,

October;1970, pp. 214-221:o

Sjaastad, L.A., "The costs and returns of human migration",Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 5, part 2,October 1962, supplement, pp. 80-93.

United Nations, Research Institute for Social Developmentand Office of'Social affairs, Cost Benefit Analysis ofSocial Pr<ests, report of a meeting held in Rennes,France, September 27-October 2, 1965, Geneva, 1966.

Z`3


Wiseman, J., "Cost benefit analysis and health service policy",Scottish Journal of Political Econo y, Vol. 10, No. 1,February 1963, pp. 12d-1 5.

(4) Law

Nye) J.S., "Corruption 'and political development: a costbenefit analysisKI_American Political Science Review, Vol.61, Ho. 2, June 196715.77:427.

Thurow, L.C., and C. Rappaport, "Law enforcement and cost '"

benefit analysis" Public Finance, Vol. 21i, Ho. 1', March1969, pp. 48-64.

(5) Research

Day, R.L., "Optimizing marketing research through cost bene-fit analysis", -Business Horizons, Vol. 91.Ho. 3, Fall1966, pp. 45-54.

Grossfield, K., and -J.B. Heath, "The,benefit and cost ofgovernment support for 'research and development: a case

. study",, Economic Journal, Vol. 76, No. 303, September

1966, 0:777477"--:--

U.S. Bureau of Eine6) A Method of Measuring the Costs andBenefits of Applied-Research, by J.L. Sprague,47.3. Government Printing Office; 1969.

5. Recreation

(1) Applying Benefit-Cost

Brewer, D., and J.A. Kuehn, "Conflicts within recreation: anemerging problem in the allocation of water and investmentfunds", Land Economics, Vol. 43, No. 4, November 1967, pp.456 -ha .

Brewer, M.F., "Incorporating 'recreational values into benefitcost analysis", in Western Agricultural Research Council,Committee on the Economics of Mater Resources Development,Conference Proceedingsljiugust 6-8, 1962. Economics inOutdoor Recreational Policy, Reno, University of Nevada,1962, pp. 146.496, Discussion by L.M. Hartman, pp. 97-98.

Cesario, P.J. and J.L, Knetsch, "Time bias in recreationbenefit estimates", Water Resources Research, Vol. 6,, No.3, June 1970, pp.

33. ,OPL 3xchange Bibliography; /267

Davidson, P., .F.G. Adams and J. Seneca, "The social value ofwater recreational facilities resulting from an improvementin water quality:, the Delaware Estuary", in Water Research,edited by A.V. Kneese and S.C. Smith, Baltimore, JohnsHopkins, 1966, pp. 175-211.

Dunn, R.N., "A problem of bias in benefit-cost analysis:consumer surplus reconsidered", Southern Economic Journal,Vol. 33, No. A, January 1967, pp. 337.-342; Discussion,Vol. 34, No. April 1968, pp. 563-571.

"Problems of bias in input pricing for benefit-cost analyses: a reply", Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No._ 4, April 1968, p. 571. -

Knetsch, J.L., "Economics of including recreation as a pur-pose of eastern water prodjects"; Journal of Farm Econo-mics, Vol. 46, No. 5, December 1964, IMP. 1148-1157.

Seckler, DX., "On the uses- nd abuse's of economic scierce inevaluating public,outdoo recreation", Land Economics, Vol.42, No. 4, govember 196 pp. 485-494.

Ullman, E.L., R.R. Boyce and D.J. Volk, Water Needs and Prob-lems, Neramec Basin Research Project, The Meramec Basin,Report, Vol. III, St. Louis, Washington Univsrsity,Neramec Basin Research Project, December 1961, Chapter V.

,(2) Measurement Problems

Beardsley, ;valuation of Recreation Benefits: TheCache La Poudre River, Colorado, Ph.D. Dissertation,

4 Logan, Utah State Univ rsii7969.

Boyet-W.E., and G.S. Tolley, "Recreation projection .basedon demand analysis", Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 48,No. 4, Part 14 November 1966, pp. 984-1001.

Cicchetti, 0.J., J.J. Seneca and P. Davidson, The Demand and'-.A,_Supply of Outdoor liecreation, New Brunswick, New Jersey,

' Bureau of Economic Research, Rutgers - the State Univer-sity,.1969.

Clawson, M., and J.L. Knetsch, Economics of Outdoor Recrea-tion, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1966.

David, 2.L. "EffeCts of nonprice variables-upon participa-tion in water-oriented outdoor recreation", Lnerican Jour-nal of Agricultural. Economics, Vol. 51, No. 4, November1969, pp. 271-240.

0t-


Davis, R.K., "Recreation planning es an economic problem"Land 'economics, Vol. 3, "o. 14, October 1963, pp. 239,249.

, The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An EconomicymlaineWoodsStud-oftl, Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge,

Harvard University, 1963.

Johnson, J.D. An Evaluation of the Polio for Estimatin theRecreational Benefits of Water Orie ted Projects. Ph.D.Dissertation, Washington, D.C. The American University,1970.

Kavankgh, N.J., "Measurement of recreational benefits ofwater resources"j Operational Research Quarterly, SpeCialConference Issue, Vol; 21, June 1970, p. 3

?-40.

Knetsch, J.L., "Outdoor Recreation Demand and Benefits",Economics, Vol. 39, ilo. 4, November 1963,/ pp. 387-396.

Lerner, L.J., "Zuantitative indices of recreational values",in Western Agricultural Economics Research Council,Committee on the Economics of Water Research Development,August 6-8, 1962. Economics in Outdoor Recreational Pol-la, Reno, University of Nevada, 1962, pp. 55-140.

, "The demand value structure of recreation", inWestern Resources Papers Conference, 1964, hew Horizonsfor Resources Research: Issues and Methodology, Boulder,

,University of Colorado Press, 1965,1pp. 21 -2U.

Merewitz, L., "Recreational Benefits of Water resource dev-elopment ", Water Resources Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.625.1.640, Fourth quarter, 1966.

Murphree, C.E., "Potential impact of outdoor recreation onresident income in the rural counties,of North Florida",Economic Leaflets, Gainesville, University of Florida,Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Vol. 23, No.,10,October 1964; pp. 1-4.

Pearse, P.H., "A new approach to the evaluation of non-pricedrecreation resources", Land itconomics, Vol. 44, No. 1,February 1968, pp. 87-99.

,

Stevens, J.B., "Recreation benefitssfrom water pollution con..;trol", Water hesources Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1966, pp.167 -182.

3 "Recreation benefits from water pollution control:a further note on benefit evaluation", Water Resources Re -seal-ch Vol. 3, No. 1, 1967, pp. 63 -614.

11111111111M NMI

35. CPL Exchange Bibliography #2.67

6tevens,-,J.B., A Study of Conflict in:Natural Resource Use:Evaluation of Recreational Benefit as Related to Chan esin :a.ter Quality, Ph.D. Dissertation, (Corvallis OregonState University, 1965.

Stovener, H.H., and U.C.1 Brown, "Analytical issues in demandanalysis for outdoor recreation", Canadian Journal ofa 'cultural Economics, Vol. 15, No. 2, December'19157, pp'1295-13o .

Trice, A.M., and S. E. Wood, 'INeasurement of recreatidn bene-fits", Land Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, August 1958,195-207; also, discussion in Land Economics, Vol. 34, No. 4)

Nov.ember 1958, pp; 365-370..

U.S. Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission, EconomicStudies Of Outdoor Recreation, Washington, U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office,196.2.

Nennergren, E.B., "Surrogate pricing of outdoor recreation";Land Economics, Vol. 43,11o. 1, February 1967, pp. 112-11(1.

'Valuing non-market priceci recreation resources."Land Economics, Vol. 40, No. 3, Augusta964, pp. 303-314.

"What 'will you pey for amenity?" Economist, Vol. 235, No.6613, Fay 23, 1970, pp. 76-77. .'

6. Water

(1) Background4

Altourney, E.G., The Role of Uncertainties in the Economic2valuation of Water Resource-Projects, Stanford, StaffordUniversity, Institute in ItgineeringlEconOmic Systems, .

1963.

Back, 1T.B., "Economics in formulating plans f*r Eastern riverbasins", Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 46, No. 5, Dec-ember 1964, pp. 1139-1147.

Bain, J.S., "Criteria for undertaking water-resOurces dev-elopment", American Economic Review; Papers & Proceedino,Vol. 50, No. 2, May 1960, pp. 310-320.

Barber, CZ., "Review of O. EcksteiAls Water Resource Devel-opment", Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,vol. 27, No. November

At

1

(


Baum, 2.L., Benefit-Cost Analysis of Water Resource Projectsand Programs, Prepared for review and discussion within theAcres Group of Companies, Toronto, Acres Ltd., July 28,1;67.

Castle, E.N., and K.D. Gardner, "Water resources derAopment:a review of the new Federal evaluation procedure", Journal

of Farm Economics, Vol. 45, No. 4, November 1963, PP.M39-5:704.

Clough, D.J., Cost Benefit Analysis for Water Resource Plan-ning in Canada, Mimeographed paper, prepared for presenta-tion at The NATO Symposium on Cost-Benefit Analysis, TheHague, July 7-11, 1969, Waterloo, University of Waterloo,Department of Management Sciences.'

Conmittee on Water Resources of the National Academy of Sci-enceational Research Council, Alternatives in WaterManagement, Washington, D.C., NAS-NRC Publication 140111966.'

Cox, P.T., C.W. Grover and B. Siskin, "Effect of water re-source investment on economic growth", Water ResourcesResearch, Vol. 7, No. 1, February 1971, pp. 32-38.

Dobyns, H.F., Anthropological Analysis of Social and Cultural.Benefits and Costs from Stream Control Measures: Phase I.Alater 'lesourcas Centre Project Completion Report, Ldxing-ton, Kentucky, University of Kentucky, 1969.

Eckstein, 0., Water Resource Development: .The Economics of,Project Evaluation, Cambridge, harvard University Presd,1958.

Fox, T.K./ and D.C. nerfindahl, "Attainment of efficiency insatisfying demands for 'slater resources", American EconomicReview, Vol. 54, No. 3, May 1964, pp. 198-206.

Freeman, A.M., "Adjusted benefit cost ratios for six recentreclamation projects," Journal of Farm Economics, Vol.48, No. 4, November 1966, pp. 1002-1012.

, and R.H. Haveman, "Benefit-cost analysis andmultiple objectives: current issues in Water ResourcesPlanning", Water Resources Research, Vol. 6, No. 6,DeCember 1970, pp. 1533-1539.

Freeman, A.M., "Six federal reclamation projects and thedistribution of income", Water Resources Research, 'Vol.3, No. 25.Second quarter 137-17F 319-332.

.19

37. 'Ca Exchange Bibliography #267

J3ertell IC.) "Recent suggestions for cost allocation of multi-ple purpoSe prqjects in the light Of public Interest",Journal of Farm Economics, Vol, 33, No. .1, Petruary 1951,pp.-130-134.

Gramm, I!.S., "Limitations of the theory-of the firm for waterresource analysis", Land Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, May1958, pp. 113-121.

. "Water resources andlyks; private investmentcriteria and social priorities", Journal of Farm Economics;,Vol. 45, No. 4, November 1963, pp. 705 -712.-

-Greenhall, J.W., C.D. Schneider and R.J. Simpson, AnnotatedBibliogra hy. of Socio-E onbmic3eference6 for Uater QualityManagement Studies in tie Saint John River Basin, Toronto;Ontario, Hedlin, Menzies and Associates Ltd., for Depart:-ment of Energy, Nines and Resources, Policy and PlanningBranch, Resources Research Centre, December'1970.;

Hartman, L.M. and D.A. Seastonel "Welfare goals and organiza-tion of decision - making for the allocation of water re-sources", Land Economics, Vol. 41, No. 1,'February 1965,pp. 21-30.

:caveman, R.H., Water Resource Investment and the PublicInterest, Nashville, Vanderbuilt University Press, 1965.

Haver, C.B. and Associates, Chicago. An Economic Analysis ofEvaluation Praetices foiWater Resources Develo ment, Chi"-cago, prepared for the United States Commission, 1 1.

Hinote, H., Benefit Cost Analysis for Water Resource Projects;a, Selected Annotated Bibliography, revised edition, Knox-ville,. University of Tennessee, Center for Business e.:Economic Research, 1969.

Hoggan71 D.H., "Repayment interest rates for water projects,Water Resources Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, June 1970, pp.663-669.

Hufschmidt, N.M.,'et. Standards and Criteria for Formulatin And Evaluatin Federal Uater Resources navel° ments,Report of pAnel of consultants to the Bureau of the Budget,Ueshington,'D.C., Bureau of the Budget, June 30, 1961.

Kneese, Air., "Economic and related problems in contemporarywater resources management", Natural Resources Journal,Vol. 5, uo, 4, October 1965, pp.. 1-23.

4

I

. -

38. CPL Exchange Bibliography V267

Krutillat.J.V., The Columbia. River Treaty; the aconomics ofan. Intermtional River Basin Development, Baltimore, JohnsHopkins. Press; 1967." ."

... ..

, "Is riablic intervention in Vater resources condu-cive to economic efficiencir"?, Natural. Resources Journal,Vol. 6, No. 1, January 1966, pp7.66-75.

. C.: 0. fiekstein, Multiple Purpose River DevelopmentStudies in Applied Economic Analysis, Baltimore; JohnsHopkins Press, 1956, j

Krutilla, J.V. "Some recent developments in river basin plan-; ning and evaluation, J6urnda. of Farm Economics, Vol. 50,

No. 5, DeceMbe4 1958,," pp. 1674,16137. 4

Kuiper, E., Vater Resources DeVelop!. Planningt angineer-

-..,, ..,!

in and Zconomick, London, Butterworthlso 1965, pp. 405-,

..

Linsley, i1.K.-$.4J.B. Franzine, later Resources.Engineering,..

UO! York, McGraw Hill, 4964.''

..

0 .

./geKean. R.N., Efficiency.iri Government Through Systerd4 Analy-sis, New York, John Ulley, 195. r

E ajorl4D.C., "Notes . on the new standavds.. sorevaluAting waterresource projectsc'Journal of Farm Economics, Ajol. 46, ..-itHo. 2, May 1964, pp. 491-407-

. . ....y

Margolis, J., 'the economic evaluation of federal water re::source developments", American Econohic Review,'Vol. t9,Uo. 1, aich 1959, pp t 96-111.

I

npo, P. Peter and P. Vincent, Annotated Biblio-granhY:, axternal Economic affects with S ecia]. Referenceto Water Resources Projects; Stanford, Stanford'University,Institute in Engineering-Economic Systems, Report 2P -18,ilovember 1965.

Martin, 11.J., and G. Roberts, ,!An evaluation of alternative,proposed roser7Voir investment schemes," aerational Re-search Quarterly, Vol..21, Ho. S1,÷1970, p. 159.,

%

Partin, R.C., et. al., Fixer Basin. Administration and theDelaware, Syracuse, Syracuse University Press, 1960, pp.116 -125.

here York (3tate) Agricultural Experimental Station, FederalEvaluation of Resource Investments: a Casb Study by R.J.Kalter, ety. al., Ithaca, NewYork, Cornell University,Vater Resources and Marine Sciences Center, 1970.

1

clb

a

39. ,CPL Exchange Bibliography P267'

Oven, J.P., and E.K. Zingler, FeasibilitypaRoseLDEam, Houston, University of Houston, Bureau-ofBusiness and Economic Research, Studies in Business andEconomics No. 5, 1958. .

Rasmussen,'D., "Investment crite the relationship ofbenefit cost and rate of n analysis",.in Water Re-source Investment Project, St. Louis; Washington'Univer-sity, Regional Studies, June 1966..

ReuberaL., and R.J. IOnnacott, The Cost of Capital in.1pCg.nadawithSeciaublicDevelomentofthep_____

Columbia River, Washington, D.C., in Resources for theFuture, 1961.

el

Rosenbaum, D.H., Review of the Economic Benefits and CostsResulting from DeileV22221721E, Lexington, University of.Kentucky, WatF Resources Institute, Research Report, No. 5,

Schmid, A.A. , "Non-market values and efficiency of publicinvestment in water resources", °American!' Economic ,RevivVol. 57, No..2, Nay 1967, pp. 158-168. .

Smith; s.c.-et E.N. Castle, eds., Economics'and,Public°Tolioyin `pater Resources Development, 45.me3,,Iova State Univer-

sity-Press, 1964, Chapters 2, 8 and 10.

Steiner, P.O.,'"Choosing among alternative public investmentsin the yater resource field", American Economic Review;Vol. I9, No. 5, December 1959, pp. 893.116.

, "The role of alternative cost in project designand selection", Quarterly Journarof Economics, Vol. 79,No. 3, August 196517570rUT77-----------

Stovener, H.H. and IN.' Castle, "Input-output ,models and,benefit cost analysis in water resources rAearch",Journal of Farm Economics,: Vol. 47, No. 5, December 1965,pp. 1572-157).

.

Tennessee Valley Authority; Division of Navigation Develop-ment r nefitdost Analysis for Water Resource Projects:

Selected Annotated Bibliography, Knoxville, Tennessee,Tennessee Valley Authority, 1967.

Tolley, G.S., and C. Harrell, pEconomics of water resource.use: extensions of benefit-cost analysis", AmericanEconomic Review: Pders & Proceedings, Vol. 52, No. 2,Flay 19 2 pp. 68.

Tolley, G.S. and F.E. Riggs, Economics of Watershed Planning.Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1961.

AN=11.3

.4


. .

United Nations, .economic Commission for Asia and the Far EastiA Case Study of the Comprehensive D6velo mentof theKitiani River Basin, Bankok: United Nations, 19 2.

United Eations, Economic Commission for Asia, and the Far East, .

Hanual of Standards,and Criteria' for 'Planning Water ResourceProjects, Water Resource Series, No.o.,26, ijew York, UnitedNations.

.,

U.S. Inter-Agenv Committee on.Water ResourCes,JSVbcommitteeon Evaluation Standards, - Proposed Practices for EconomicAnalysis of River Basin Pxojects., Washington, U.S. GdVern-

A raeriTtirWice (.757e 1958.,

-U.S., President's Water Resources Council, Policies, Stan-dards, and Proceedings in'the Formulation :Evaluation andReview of Plans for the Develo.ment' of Water and RelatedLand Resources, Senate Docume No. 91y 7th Congress,2nd Session, Kay 29, 1962, Washington, U.S Gove nmentPrintings Office, 1962.

U.S.,,,Water Resources Council, Special Task Force) Proceduresfor Evaluation of Water and Related Land Resource Pr's ojeots,Washington, Water Resources Council, June 19.9.

"Watex_riorkshop B, Benefit cost analysis ", Resources ,f orfo,morolr; .Conference Background Papers, Vol. 3, Ottawa,Queen's Printer, 1961, pp. 145-159.

Ct

,Western Agricultural Economics Research Council, Evaluationof secondary benefits of water use projects, Report No. 1,Berkeley, 1953, PP. 49-62:

(2) Flood Contra

Acres, Ltd., Guidelines for Analysis: Secondary Flood ControlBenefits, Toronto, Acres Ltd., August 1968.

Clough, D.J., Alvinston Dam Benefit-Cost Analysis, Strathroy,Ontario, Sydenham Valley Conservation Authority, 1968.

'!Benefit -cost analysis, Lauer Tillsonburg Damand Reservoir, Big Otter Creek", Appendix E in fatnaffirlaReport, Big Otter Creek, Tillsonfurg, Ontario, Otter CreekConservation Authority, 1965.

, "Benefit-cost analysis of proposed system of damson _the Speed and Eramosa Rivers", Appendix E, in Grand

( Valley Conservation AuthorityAeport on Flood Control andWater Conservation, Galt, Ontario, Grand Valley Conserva-ti onr Authority, 1965,

(3)


Clough, D.j., "Measures of value and statistical models inthe economic analysis of flood control and water conserva-tion schemes", Transactions of the Engineering Instituteof Canada, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 1961, pp. 31-37.

scillthoni.L.:212j21220....Llaisk, Kings-ton, Ontario, South Nation Conservation Authority, 1968.

Franzini, J.B., "Flood control...average annual benefits",Consulting Engineer, Vol. 25, May 1961, pp. 1077109.

Freund, R.A. Jr. and G.S. Tolley, "Operational procedures forevaluating flood protection benefits'', in Economics andPublic Policy in Water Resource Develo ment, edited by D.C.'Smith & E.N. Oastlel/Ames, Iowa State University Press,1964.

Hibdon, J.E., "Flood control benefits and the Tennessee,Valley Luthority", Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 251.

July 1958, PP. 48 -63."

McDonald, G.T. and W.K. Lee, ArmRitioAarlEcoraisalof Floodlitigation Works on the hacley Floodplain, Armidale,N.S.W., Department of Geography, University of New Englandfor the Macleay River County Council, 1968.

Nanitoba, Royal Commission on Flood Cost-Benefit, 1192211,1958, Winnipeg, Manitoba, The Commission, 1958.

Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Planfor Flood Control .and Water Conservation Woodbridge, Ont-ario: Metropolitan Toronto and Region ConservationAuthority, 1959.

Pinola, R., A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Grand River WatershedMultiple Pulyose Development Projects, Fergus, Grand RiverConservation Commission, 1964.

,U.S._ Department of Agriculture) Soil Conservation Service)Economics Guide for Watershed Protection and Flood Preven-tion, Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.

Whipple, W.W., "Optimizing investment in flood control andflood plain zoning", Water Resources Research, Vol. 5,

No. 4) August 1969, pp. 475-479N

Irrigation

Hartman, L.M.1 and R.L. Anderson) "Estimating the value ofirrigation,water from farm sales data in North-easternColorado", Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1,February, 1962, pp. 207-213.


Knetsch, J.L., "The influence of-reservoir projects on landvalUes", Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 46, No. 1,February 1964, pp. 231-243.

Marts, N.E., "Use of indirect benefit analysis in eStablish-ing repayment responsibility for irrigation pr jectsth,Economic Geography, Vol. 32, No. 2, April 195 ) pp. 132- '

177-

Eilliman, J.U., "Land values :as measuha of ary irrigationbenefits", Journal of Farm Economics, Vo 41,'No. 2, MAY1959, pp.

National Council of Applied Economic Re earch Criteria fonFixation of Water Rates and Selection of IrrAat_./1.on Pro-jects, London, Asia Publishing Hogse 1959.

Renshaw, E.F., "Value of an acre-foot of water",-Journal ofthe American Water Works Association, Vol. 50, No: 3,March 1958, pp. 303-309.

Pollution

Baxter, S.A., "Economic considerations of water pollution,control", Water Pollution Control Federation, Journal,Vol. 37, No. 10, OctOber 1965, pp. 1363-1369.

Bramhall, D.F. and E.S. Mills, "Alternative methods of im-proving 'Stream quality: an economic and policy analysis",Water Resources Research, Vol. 2, irr. 3, 1966, pp. 3*363.

Cleary, E.J., "Benefit-cost considerations in water qualitymanagement", Public Works, Vol. 94, december 1963, 661 68,70.

Davis, R.K., "Some economic aspects of advanced waste t4at-ment", Water Pollution Contra Federation, Journal, Vol.37, NO. 19, December 19 , pp. 1 7-1.2;.

Dutta, N. and P. Asch, The Measurement of Water QualityBenefits, Bureau of Economic Research, Report for the]Delaware River Basin Commission, Rutgers - the StateUniversity, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1966.

Eliassen, R., and W.F. Rowland, Industrial Benefits Derivedfrom roved Raw Water Qualit in the Contra Costa Canal,Stanford, Stanford University, Institute of Engineering -Economic Systems, September 1962.

Hammond, R.J., Benefit Cost Analysis and Water PollutionControl, Stanford, Stanford University, Food ResearchInstitute, 1960.


Kneese, A.V., The Economics of Re 'onal Water Quality liana e-ment,,Da.ltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 19 .

Parker, D.S., Crutchfield,'"Water quality managementand the time profile of benefits and costs", Water Resour-ces Research, Vol. J4, No. 2, April 1968,.pp. 233 72-47.7.

Sonnen, Y.B., Evaluation of Alternative Waste Treathent Facil-ities, Ph.D:,Dissertation, Urbana, University of Illinois,1967.

(5) Supply

Bain, R.E. Cats&..and J, Bargolis Northern California's1-ster Industry, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins", 1966, Chapter -6.

Brown, 'T., "The California water project: is public decisionmaking becoming more efficient?" 'Faber Resources Research,Vol. 4, oo. 3, June 1968, pp: 463-47.0.

California, Department of Water Resources, Allocations ofCosts Among Purposes of the California STR;Uater Pro-ject, Department of 1.4ater Resources, Californii7.0557

Dehaven, J.C., and J.. Hirshleifer, " "Feather River water' for

California", Land Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, August 1957,pp. 198-209.

Hirshleifer, J., et. al., 1.!ateruplyrEconlicsgechno-logy, and Policy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,1960.

Pyatt, E.E., and P.P. Rogers, "On estimating benefit-costratios for water supply investments'', American Journal ofPublic Health, Vol. 52, October 1962, FP71.--.729:

Pyatt, E.E., P.P. Rogers and H. Sheikh, "Benefit -cost analy-sis for municipal water supplies", Land Economics, Vol;40, No. 4, Novem6r41964, pp. 444-449.

Stober, N.J. and L.H. Falk, "A benefit cost analysis of localwater supply", Land 3conomics, Vol. 43, No. 3, August 1967,PP. 32a-335.

44 CPL Exchange Bibliography #267

C.,

COUNCIL OF PLANNING LIBRARIANS Exchange i'aphy #267

BZNIFIT-COST ANALYSIS: A SELLOT BIBLIOGRAPHY

Additional copies available from:

Council, of Planning LibrariansPost Office Box 229

Monticello, Illinois 61856

for: $4.50

new ti · 2020. 5. 4. · and/ applied aspects of benefit-cost analysis. the bibliography is...

Documents