new swedish regulations and a framework for fire safety engineering 2012 - presentation
TRANSCRIPT
New Swedish building regulations and a framework for fire safety engineering
Caroline Cronsioe, The National board of building, housing and planning
Michael Strömgren, SP Fire technology David Tonegran, Tyréns Henrik Bjelland, University of Stavanger
Content
The Swedish concept for performance-based design
New buildings vs. Alteration Analytical design procedures
European possibilities
Example, hierarcy
Buildings shall be designed with adequate protection against fire spread between buildings.
Adequate protection is achieved if buildings are constructed at a distance of more than 8 m. /…/
Limiting the risk of fire spread between buildings can be achieved, for example, by: - buildings being erected at a suitable distance from each other, - restricting the size of unprotected building components, - restricting the fire susceptibility of exposed surfaces, or - restricting the extent of the fire with fire safety installations such as an automatic fire suppression system. For analysis of fire spread between buildings, the maximum radiation levels on the exposed building should not exceed acceptable levels for all relevant scenarios.
Protection against the spread of fire between buildings Mandatory provisions (Operative requirements)
General recommendation (Analytical design)
General recommendation (Prescriptive design or acceptable solution)
General recommendations for analytical design
1. Buildings shall comply with the fire protection
regulations for new buildings
2. The mandatory provisions may be
satisfied in a other way if the corresponding safety
level is still achieved
3. Deviations from the safety level may be made if there are exceptional
circumstances
Main rule Not always possible to fulfill
Every building has its unique problems and solutions All buildings, built yesterday or those built in the 15th century
Analytical design is possible to use
When building a new building you always need to fulfill the mandatory provisions When altering a building is not always possible to fulfill the mandatory provisions For a few buildings this 2nd step is still not enough
If deviations from the mandatory provisions are made (step 2 and 3), the design shall be verified with analytical design
Fire regulations Alterations of buildings
Analytical design procedures
Required for certain buildings and when deviating from prescriptive regulations
Possible for both new and altered buildings
General process Identifying deviations from
prescriptive code Verifying the tradeoffs Review & documentation
Verification procedures
Verifying operational requirements Comparative analysis (prescriptive solutions) Design criteria for certain scenarios
Verification methods Qualitative assessment (limited use) Scenario based analysis Quantitative risk analysis
Robustness assessment, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis may be required
Example: Verifying means of escape by scenario analysis Three design scenarios with various design
fires (for RSET) Recommended minimum values: 5 and
10 MW Robustness: 2 MW Effect of sprinklers
Design conditions for ASET Pre-movement time Travel time
Design criteria For example, 80C Temperature, 5 m
visibility etc.
Status of FSE in Europe
Most countries use prescriptive regulations as a base for FSE
Competence levels among practitions vary
Regulatory support and methods for FSE is lacking
However, complex buildings deviating from prescriptive regulations are built any way
Challenges for Europe
Need for FSE tools and harmonisation
Account must be taken for differences in Legal and regulatory structures Review & control processes Competence levels among practitioners
Work is going on in European
standardization and in SFPE Europe
Conclusions
Balance between flexibility and societal risk control
Need for risk calibration and risk criteria – these should be set nationally…
… and the risk level of prescriptive regulations is a good start
European countries should adopt a common method and approach to FSE