new rubber devolatilization opportunities (direct
TRANSCRIPT
4/1/2016
1
New Rubber Devolatilization Opportunities (Direct Desolventizing) Opportunities (Direct Desolventizing) Enabled by Unconventional Technology
George E. Schlager
P d t M LIST AGProduct Manager LIST AG
57th Annual General Meeting of the International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers (IISRP)
New Orleans, USA, April 11‐14, 2016
New Orleans 2016 57th AGM
Agenda
• Kneader reactor technology
• Devolatilization kinetic model
• Commercial process comparison
• Two step kneader process
• Product development of Rubber manufactures
• Conclusion / Summary
New Orleans 2016 57th AGM 2
4/1/2016
2
LIST COMPANY
• Private Company
• > 450 Installations
• 100 Employees (60 Engineers)
• Manufacturing by Strategic Partners
• Quality Assurance by LIST
• Fully equipped R&D Facility
New Orleans 2016 57th AGM
Heinz List Vision back in 1966:
“Processes in the concentrated phase are considerably more efficient than processes
in the diluted phase and therefore also significantly more economical.”
3
KneaderTechnology
• Excellent Mixing & Kneading
• Large Heat Exchange Surfaces
• Efficient Renewal of Phase Boundary Layers
• Effective Self-Cleaning
• Large Working Volumes
New Orleans 2016 57th AGM
1 m
• High Torque Applications
• Wide Range of Shear Rate
• Plug Flow
• Batch & Conti
4
4/1/2016
3
KneaderTechnology Single Shaft Example
V l tilF d V l il VaporVapor
Connections VolatilesFeed Volatiles
ProprietaryDisks with
Mixing El t
High StrengthHeated Housing
High StrengthHeated Shaft
VaporConnections with large
Cross SectionalArea
Connections with large
Cross SectionalArea
New Orleans 2016 57th AGM 5
Discharge
Cross Sectional
ViewSide View
ProprietaryCounter Hooks
Elements
Twin Shaft ExampleVideo
6
4/1/2016
4
Conventional vs. Direct Devolatilization
Solution Polymerization
Stripping
Separation
Coagulation
Expeller
Main Evaporation
Finishing
Water & Steam
Consumption /
Solvent recovery
Footprint / Maintenance
Confectioning
Expander
Belt dryer
Finishing
7
Air handling and emissions
Overall Process Flow Diagram
Pre-Concentration
Condensation / Recovery
Condensation / Recovery
Main EvaporatorReactor
(Optional)Recovery
Condensation / Recovery
8
Finisher
Confectioning
4/1/2016
5
Main Evaporation
• Cement feed of 75-90% solvent
• Maximum temperature of 100 – 130 °C
• Back mixed kneader reactor
• Discharge target of 2-10% solvent
• High energy duty for solvent evaporation
• Challenges to design a solvent evaporator process:
• Featuring maximal contact heat input
• Use mechanical heat input dissipation to further increase capacity
• High mechanical energy input
9
• Use mechanical heat input dissipation to further increase capacity
• Prevent foam development, which inhibits contact heat input and plugs vapor lines
• Exhibiting maximal flexibility regarding evaporation capacities and polymer grade
Main Evaporation – DevelopmentExperimental & Process Simulation
Continuous back‐mixed reactor
Feed 1Feed 2
Feed 3Feed 4Continuous back‐mixed reactor
Viscous mass
Main Evaporator
CSTR
Feed 4
Heat transferHeat transfer
Torque (50 %)Torque (100 %)
Multiple feed port – CSTR cascade model Experimental development <‐> process simulation and
calculations
10
4/1/2016
6
Cement Feed Rate on Kneader Shaft Speed
35
40
45
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
[kg/h
]
1 feed port:
2 feed ports:
11
0
5
0 0.5 1 1.5
[Hz]RPM
30 60 90
Conclusions – Main Evaporation
• Model developed to predict evaporation capacity using CSTR cascade RTD
• Improved process using multiple feed ports
• Good agreement between prediction and observed feed distribution
• Improved product handling (foam)
• Flexibility of polymer grades
12
4/1/2016
7
Finishing
• Definition:• Removal of volatile components from polymer stream (e.g. non reacted monomer or solvent)
• Process Challenge:• Final product temperature control• Avoid shear• Minimize residence time (maximize process efficiency)• Achieve final volatile specification
13
• Pasty feed of 2-10% solvent
• Maximum temperature of 100 – 130 °C
• High viscosity high mechanical energy overheating of elastomer
• Plug flow kneader
• Injection of stripping media for devol & temperature control
• Discharge target of < 200-2000 ppm solvent
Finishing – Liquid Injection
• Enhanced mass transfer
• Low partial pressure of solvent
• Atmospheric pressure (absolute pressure determines total VOC content)
• Temperature control through evaporative cooling
• High shaft speed possible without overheating product
• High product fill possible without overheating product
14
product
• Final temperature independent of residence time
• VOC content mainly water (strip medium), which typically is acceptable to customers
R&D – 160l Scale up Finisher
4/1/2016
8
Finishing – Liquid Injection
Off Gas
• Axial conveyance is largely independent of shaft speed
• Significantly lower shear than extruder
Liquid injection
• Suitable for diffusion-limited processes requiring long residence times
• Large free volume
• Low vapor velocity, no particle entrainment
• Process flexibility
• Feed conditions
15
LIST FinisherProduct
• Capacity (high turn down ratio)
Two Step Process for Direct Devolatilization
• Installed at Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Schkopau, Germany
• Part of larger semi works plant for polymer synthesis, d dproduction, and testing
• Applicable for scale-up testing
• Detail Engineering completed for 40kty
16
4/1/2016
9
Comparison to Conventional Process
Operation Cost
Stripping Technology Direct DevolatilizationTechnology
Operation Cost Energy Consumption higher lower Plant Operation higher lower Plant Cleaning Effort higher lower Solvent Purification higher lower
Environmental Off Gas cleaning (Incineration) necessary not necessary Waste Water cleaning higher lower
May 5, 2008 17
Product Quality• low temperature; low shear higher lower• continuous steady state condition worse better
Opportunities – Devolatilization – high cis
Product development of Rubber manufactures
High Performance Tires High Performance Polymers High high cis (99+) and low low cis polymers Driving force for catalyst development
High cis PBR (99+) – linear Polymer
High cis high stickiness High stickiness higher viscosity during polymerization Hi h i it d rin p l m riz ti n l r r bb r n ntr ti n (7%) High viscosity during polymerization lower rubber concentration (7%) Lower rubber concentration Less effectiveness in processing
High stickiness = bad coagulation High stickiness = bad mechanical dewatering High stickiness = bad drying
18
4/1/2016
10
• Opportunity to produce new grades -> flexibility on market trends and demands
• Improve product temperature control -> quality
Conclusion / Direct DevolatilizaitonTechnology Benefits
• Less space required
• Minimize solvent separation step - environmently sound
• Less utility consumption –> less OPEX –> higher profits
• Less maintenance cost -> less cleaning efforts
• Less off-spec materials
• Less solvent losses (VOC’s) – 100% closed system with LISTLess solvent losses (VOC s) 100% closed system with LIST
• Less routine replacement parts
19
Thank you
New Orleans 2016 57th AGM 20