new puma iii-60 and ce6000-60 … vs... · 2015. 7. 31. · puma3-60 is better than ce6000-60 in...

24
PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 (Quality/Operation/Mechanic/AP/UI) MK-JIM test report Items: Cutting quality Machine operation AP/UI operation Quality comparison PUMA3-60 CE6000-60 Vinyl 12pt~46pt Model Items

Upload: others

Post on 09-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60

(Quality/Operation/Mechanic/AP/UI) MK-JIM test report

Items:

Cutting quality

Machine operation

AP/UI operation

Quality comparison

PUMA3-60 CE6000-60

Vinyl 12pt~46pt

Model

Items

Page 2: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Speed: 15cm/s “Fine”, Force: 85g、Offset 0.250 、Up Speed: 30cm/s

Cutting time: 2min 32sec

Good quality

Speed: 15cm/s Force: 2 Offset: -2

Cutting time: 2min 40sec

Good quality

(1m test image)

Speed: 60cm/s “Draft”, Force: 85g、Offset 0.250 、Up Speed: 30cm/s

Cutting time: 4min 35sec

Good quality, cutting fast

Speed:60cm/s Force:12 Offset:-2

Cutting Time: 6min 05sec

Good quality

Page 3: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Thirty circles

Speed: 60cm/s “Draft”, Force: 85g, Offset 0.250 、Up Speed: 60cm/s

Cutting time: 1min 24sec

Good quality

Speed: 60cm/s Force: 12 Offset: -2

Cutting time: 1min 23sec

Good quality

Thirty squares

Speed:60cm/s “Draft”, Force: 85g, Offset 0.250, Up Speed: 60cm/s

Cutting time: 34sec

Good quality, cutting fast

Speed: 60cm/s Force: 12 Offset: -2

Cutting time: 56sec

Quality: acceptable

Page 4: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

1m image with Reg.

mark

Speed: 60cm/s “Draft”, Force: 85g, Offset 0.250, Up Speed: 60cm/s

Cutting time: 3min 12sec

(Reg. mark scanning time: 38sec)

X axis and Y axis without shifting

Speed: 60cm/s Force: 12 Offset: -2

Cutting time: 3min 45sec

(Reg. Mark scanning time: 15sec)

X axis and Y axis shift 0.2mm~0.3mm

Mechanic/Operation comparison

Carriage/blade holder

Page 5: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Cutting force 5~400 g

Cutting force 20~300g

Pinch roller

Two pinch rollers

Two pinch rollers

The convenience of

moving pinch roller

Easy to move

Easy to move

Page 6: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

The operation of lever

Easy to operate

Easy to operate (It’s easier to pull and quieter)

The sensitivity of touch

panel

Users can set 4 sets of parameters.

Users can set 8 sets of parameters.

It’s very user friendly to equip with FAST button to move the

carriage, and the carriage will speed up.

The words on LCM screen are clear.

Sizing width Sizing the width of working area with two pinch rollers.

590mm x 50m

Sizing the width of working area with two pinch rollers.

Max. Cut Area: 603 mm × 50 m

584 mm × 5 m(When using optional basket)

Page 7: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Set parameters

Speed: 1~600mm/s (Quality: Fine, Normal, Fair, Draft)

Force: 5~400g Offset: 0~1mm

Adjusting steps: On/Off line→ Speed , Force, and Offset etc.

Speed:1 to 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 45, 50, 55, 60, 64

(45°direction 90 cm/s)

Cutting Pressure: 0.2 to 2.94 N (20 to 300 gf) 31 steps

Cut Test Cut test is available and the test image is adjustable. Cut test is available.

Interfaces RS-232C/USB2.0 (Full Speed) RS-232C/USB2.0 (Full Speed)

Width of working area

Max. cutting area : 590mm x 50m

All paper size

Saving paper mode

Max. Cut Area:603 mm × 50 m

584 mm × 5 m(When using optional basket)

All paper size

Conclusion::::

Quality

PUMA3-60 vs. CE6000-60 (12pt~46pt)→good quality

PUMA3-60 vs.CE6000-60 (image 1M)→PUMA3 cutting faster

PUMA3-60 vs.CE6000-60 (circle)→good quality

PUMA3-60 vs.CE6000-60 (square)→PUMA3 good quality and cutting faster.

PUMA3-60 vs.CE6000-60 (reg. mark)→PUMA3 provides accurate cutting capability and fast cutting speed.

Cutting quality of both is acceptable. (It is faster that CE6000-60 scan Reg. mark.)

Page 8: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Mechanic Operation

CE6000-60 is user friendly to equip with the FAST button on the control panel.

The words on CE6000-60 LCM screen are clearer.

CE6000-60 can be set eight sets of parameters; PUMA3 can be set eight sets of four parameters

AAS cutting process

Items

Model PUMA3-60 CE6000-60

4 Point

Registration

flow

Click on AAS icon

Click on “Application Launcher”→Choose “Registration Marks(CM3)”

→“AAS II Reg. Mark Setting v2.09-01” pops up, and then select “4

point.” →“Registration Marks” pops up, and then select “4 Marks.”

Page 9: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→Generating “Registration Marks”

→Generating “Registration Marks”

→Click “file” to print →Click “file” to print

Page 10: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→Print image→ AAS cutting→Completed

→ Select “Send Cut Lines to CM3”

→Open Cutting master3

→ Click “send”→ AAS cutting→ Completed

PUMA3-60 CE6000-60

Segmental Click AAS icon

Click “Application Launcher”→select “Registration Marks (CM3)”

Page 11: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Registration

flow

→ “AASII Reg. Mark Setting V2.09-01” pops up, then select

“Segmental”

→“Registration Mark” pops up, then select “Segment”

→Generating “Registration Marks” →Generating “Registration Marks”

Page 12: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→Click “file” to print →Click “file” to print

→Print image→ AAS cuGng→Completed

→ Click on “Send Cut Lines to CM3”

Open “Cutting master3”→

Page 13: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→ click on “send”→AAS cutting→Completed

PUMA3-60 CE6000-60

Multiple

copies

Registration

flow

Click AAS icon

Clicking “Application Launcher”→ Select “Registration Marks(CM3)”

→“AASII Reg. Setting v2.09-01” pops up, then select “Multiple copies”

to set “X & Y copies” number →“Registration Mark” pops up, then select “4 Marks”

Page 14: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→Generating “Registration Marks”

→Generating “Registration Marks”

→Click “file” to print →Click on “Send Cut Lines to CM3”

Page 15: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→Print image→AAS cutting→Completed

By clicking “Cutting master3”

Select “Matrix Copies”

Page 16: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Matrix Copies completed

→click on “send”→AAS cutting→Completed

Page 17: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Conclusion::::

It’s more complicating that overall flow of Registration Mark in CE6000-60. The flow of Registration Mark in GCC cutting plotter is more user-friendly.

There’s no Multiple copies function with CE6000-60 in CorelDraw. We need to generate 4 point in CorelDraw and set Matrix Copies in Cutting master 3.

And then set space in Copy. That is more steps and more complicated.

The process is similar to set Registration with Illustrator

PUMA3-60 (figure 1) and CE6000-60 (figure 2)

Options in Illustrator_PUMA3-60 Registration Options in Illustrator_CE6000-60 Registration

figure 1 figure 2

File

�Scripts

� _AASII_Plug_In

File

�Cutting Master 3

� Registration Marks

Page 18: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

UI process

Items

Model

PUMA3-60 CE6000-60

UI flow

Edit the image

Edit the image

→click on Print to choose PUMA3

→click on “Send Cut Lines to CM3”

Page 19: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

→AAS cutting→Completed

→click on “Send”→Completed

PS. You can also set the parameter in driver.

Conclusion::::It’s only few steps and convenient to both in UI process.

Page 20: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

AP

Great Cut 3、、、、Cutting Master3 comparision

Model

Item Great Cut 3 Cutting Master3

UI yes yes

AP yes N/A

Layout yes yes

Welding yes yes

Reg. Mark yes

(4Ponit、、、、Segmental、、、、Multiple Copy)

yes

(4Mark、、、、Segmental、、、、Matrix Copies)

Image Contour yes N/A

Tiling yes yes

Multi-pen parameters settings N/A yes

Corel Draw AAS Plug-in yes

(additional Out/in line is good)

Yes

Illustrator AAS Plug-in yes

(additional Out/in line is good)

Yes

Saving paper mode Yes Yes

Geometry tool N/A Yes

Path tool yes yes

Gallery N/A N/A

Page 21: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

CE6000-60 provides a professional AP and the instruction shown as below

Graphtec Studio

Model

Item Graphtec Studio

UI yes

Sizing width N/A

Layout Yes

Welding Yes

Reg. Mark yes

(4Mark、、、、Segmental、、、、Matrix Copies)

Image Contour Yes

Tiling Yes

Multi-pen parameters settings Yes

Corel Draw AAS Plug-in Yes

Illustrator AAS Plug-in Yes

Saving paper mode Yes

Geometry tool Yes

Path tool Yes

Gallery yes

Page 22: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Others

The user friendly and diversified tools comes

with Fill Gradient、Pattern、shadow、Line

Style、Replicate, etc.

Conclusion ::::

Graphtec Studio is an AP to edit the image, plot, output to cut and with gallery database, and Cutting Master is an auxiliary plug-in to edit Reg. Mark quickly

and output simply. From a practical point of view, the function of GreatCut 3 is between Graphtec Studio and Cutting Master.

Conclusion

PUMA3-60 and CE6000-60 comparison (mechanic/quality/AP/UI)

Model

Item PUMA3-60 CE6000-60

Vinyl

12pt~46pt

Good quality Good quality

1m Image testing Good quality, cutting fast Good quality

Circle Good quality Good quality

Square Good quality, cutting fast Quality acceptable

Page 23: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Reg. Mark X axis and Y axis without shifting X axis and Y axis shift 0.2mm~0.3mm

carriage/blade

holder Cutting force 5~400g Cutting force 5~300g

Pinch roller Two sets Two sets

The convenience

of moving pinch

roller

Easy to move Easy to move

The practicability

and noise of

lever

Easy to operate Easy to operate and quieter

Touch panel and

keys

Four sets of parameters

Eight sets of parameters

FAST button

LCM clear

Sizing width 590mm x 50m Max. Cut Area:603 mm × 50 m

584 mm × 5 m(When using optional basket)

Parameter and

speed setting

Speed:1~600mm/s

(Quality: Fine, Normal, Fair, Draft)

(849 mm/s at 45°direction)

Force: 5~400g

Offset: 0~1mm

Speed:

1 to 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 45, 50, 55, 60, 64

(900 mm/s at 45°direction)

Cutting Pressure: 0.2 to 2.94 N (20 to 300 gf) 31

steps

Page 24: New PUMA III-60 and CE6000-60 … VS... · 2015. 7. 31. · PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality. 2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed. 3. PUMA3-60

Cut test before

printing yes yes

interfaces RS-232C/USB2.0 (Full Speed) RS-232C/USB2.0 (Full Speed)

*Please refer above the detail information.*

Conclusion:

What’s the strength of Puma III?

1. PUMA3-60 is better than CE6000-60 in cutting quality.

2. PUMA3-60 is faster than CE6000-60 in cutting speed.

3. PUMA3-60 Reg. Mark is more accurate than CE6000-60.

4. AAS workflow in GCC is more convenient than CE6000 Cutting Master3.