new combustion analysis of nanoenergetic materials review meeting/psu_yetter_neem_muri... · 2010....
TRANSCRIPT
-
NEEM MURI ARO Final Review of "A Unified Multiscale Approach for Nano Engineered Energetic Materials,” Heat Center, Aberdeen, Maryland,
15 March 2010
Combustion Analysis of Nanoenergetic Materials
Richard Yetter, Jongguen Lee, Mike Weismiller, Justin Sabourin, Steven Dean, and Bruce Yang The Pennsylvania State UniversityThe Pennsylvania State University
Tim Foley, Blaine Asay(L Al N ti l L b t )(Los Alamos National Laboratory)Steven F. Son (Purdue University)Tim Eden, Orlando Cabarcos, Dave Allara (Penn State)
-
NEEM MURI Research Areas
• Flame spread across thin fuel films of nano metallic particles. • Combustion of nAl with O2/Ar mixtures – unified theory developed.• Combustion of nAl with CO CO N O and N• Combustion of nAl with CO2, CO, N2O, and N2.
• Combustion of nano metallic particles and flame propagation through quasi-homogeneous mixtures of nano metallic particles and liquid and gaseous oxidizers.gaseous oxidizers.
• Combustion of nAl/liquid H2O• Combustion of nAl/H2O/H2O2• Combustion of nAl/CH3NO23 2• Combustion of nB/CH3NO2
• Combustion of nano metallic particles and flame propagation through quasi-homogeneous mixtures of nano metallic particles and solid oxidizers.
• Combustion of nano Al/MoO3 thermites – stoichiometry and channel size.
• Combustion of nano Al/CuO thermites –fuel particle size, density, and dil tion effectsdilution effects.
• Combustion of nB in Al/CuO thermites.• Self-assembly of ordered microspheres of a nanoscale thermite.
-
NEEM MURI Research Areas
• Liquid propellants with nanostructured additives and nano aluminum gelled propellantsand nano aluminum gelled propellants.
• Temperature, pressure, and oxidizer particle effects on nanothermiteson nanothermites.
• Nano intermetallic powder systems.
-
NEEM MURI Self-Assembled Nanoscale Thermite Microspheres
Opal gem: organized nanoparticle self assemblySanders, J. V., Murray, M. J., Nature v275, 1978.
Structure of the Abalone Shell (A reactive material structure?)A. Lin and A. Meyers, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 390, 27-41, 2005.
inorganic layers: (inter-metallic fuel layers?)Laboratory assembled nAu & nAg composites o ga c aye s ( te eta c ue aye s )
organic layers: (energetic binder layers?)
Laboratory assembled nAu & nAg compositesKalsin et al., Science, v312, 2006
•Create Self‐Assembled Monolayer (SAM) on surface of particles•Monolayers contain a functionalized group at tail end (either + or
nAl‐TMA(trimethyl(11‐mercaptoundecyl)
– charged)•When mixed in a diluted and elevated temperature they form energetic macroscale structures with nanoscale constituents
Malchi, J., Foley,T., Yetter, R.A., Reactive Composite
nAl (38nm)
ammonium chloride) ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2009
p
~4 μm
nCuO(33nm)
nCuO‐MUA(11‐mercaptoundecanoic acid )
-
NEEM MURI Nanostructured Additives for Enhanced Propellant Combustion
GrapheneAluminum monohydroxide Silica
3
3.5
/s
Pchamber
=
5.24 +/- 0.05 MPa
Neat NM; 5.23 MPa, rb = 1.2 mm/s
2.5
FGSAl
2O
3 Plus
Porous SiO2
ning
Rat
e, m
m/NM + 0.5% (mass)
AlOOH; 5.16 MPa, rb = 1.6 mm/s
NM + 0 39% (mass)
1.5
2Li
near
Bur
t NM 1 20 /
NM + 0.39% (mass) SiO2 gel; 5.25 MPa, rb = 1.9 mm/s
10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Concentration, volume %
rb, neat NM ~ 1.20 mm/s
2 s steps, under Argon
NM + 0.3% (mass) FGS22; 5.16 MPa, rb = 2.2 mm/s
-
NEEM MURI Combustion of Nano Aluminum Gelled Propellants
-
NEEM MURI Propagation Mechanisms of Nanothermite Reactions
P Pressure Gradient drives gases forwardP Pressure Gradient drives gases forwardConvection wave
When ignited in a burn-tube, ‘fast’ nanothermites (Al/C O Al/M O
Pressure gradient drives reaction forward
(Al/CuO, Al/MoO3, Al/Bi2O3) react through a convective mechanism
Convective burning is
Heat Conduction
Convective burning is driven by the creation of a large pressure gradient in the porous mixture, and not by a temperature
Hot gases penetrate the granular mixtureFlame Zone
Temp= Tf
Porous Reactants
and not by a temperature gradient
Pressure Transducers
Fiber Optic Cables
Conduction waveTemperature gradient drives reaction forward
Conduction wave Temperature gradient drives reaction forward
ThT0Powder –FilledTube
-
NEEM MURI Effect of Pressure on the Propagation Rate in a Al/CuO Nanothermite
/s)
nt V
eloc
ity
atin
g
ting
nt V
eloc
ity
m/s
m/s /s
Nano-aluminum from Novacentrix (avg. dp=38nm)Nano CuO from Sigma-Aldrich (avg. dp=33nm)Studies conducted in an optical strand burner (V=23 liters)
ff ( )
Vf (
m/
As pressure is increased, several different modes of propagation are observed P t hi h ti d h d d
Fast
Con
stan
Acc
eler
a
Osc
illa
Slo
w C
onst
an
100’
s
~1 k
m
~1 mPressurized with 3 different gases (Ar, He, or N2)
Pressure (MPa)Pressure at which propagation mode changes depends on pressurizing gas; He has a high thermal conductivity
1000 1000 10002 32 3 3+ → +Al CuO Al O Cu
100
1000
] 100
1000
] 100
1000
s]
Ar He N2
10
Vf [m
/s]
atin
g
erat
ing 10
V f[m
/s]
llatin
g 10Vf[m
/s
llatin
gel
erat
ing
10 5 10 15
Pa
[MPa]
Osc
ill
Acc
ele
10 5 10 15
Pa[MPa]
Osc
il
10 5 10 15P
a[MPa]
Osc
iA
cce
-
NEEM MURI Temperature Measurements forunderstanding Gas Generation
Previous work: gas fraction at equilibriumDrawbacks:• No intermediate gases (not present at equilibrium)
nAl/MoO3 30
• Many of the equilibrium gases will not be realized until very high temperatures (ex. Cu: BP of 2835K)
nAl/CuO in burn tube at
10
20
essu
re [M
Pa] 1atm in air
nAl/MoO3 0
10
0 0.0005 0.001
Pre
Time [s]
The measured over-pressures (in excess of 10 [MPa]) can only be explained by gas generation
1 PTRPN
P gen ⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
+=Δ
Time [s]
121int
PTRTRV
P −⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
+=Δ
Heating of interstitial gasGeneration of
gaseous species
-
NEEM MURI Optical Temperature Measurements
Time integrated temperature measurement set-up
Temporally resolved temperature measurements via streak camera
Pile of energetic themite to be sampled
Optical fiber
Spark igniter
Image Processor
High Speed Camera
CL+
-
Spark igniter
SignalGenerator
CCD Camera
Spark Igniter
Thermite-FilledBurn TubeGenerator
External Trigger
StreakCamera
(C7700-01)
Output Optics
SignalGenerator
Ocean Optics HR2000 Spectrometer
Data Acquisition Computer
Spectrograph
Input Optics
Optical fiber Coupling lens
pp
-
NEEM MURI Optical Pyrometry requires consideration of Material Spectral Emissivity
Simplest Solution:
In general: ( )T,λεε =
.const=ε Two-color pyrometryMore Accurate Solution:
Assume emissivity has a known relationship with λ ( ε ~ λn )
Planck’s Law
( ) ( )⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡ −
⋅=1
,,25
1
TC
e
CTTEλλ
λελ
( )λε 3C=18
667 5001000λ [nm]
λ 2 d t l id d( ) λλε =
Curve Fitting Equation [used by Ng et al Review of Scientific Instruments (2001)] 14
16
Z
y = 6.06961E-06x + 5.0513T = 2370 K
ε~λ-2 and ε =const, also considered
( ) ( )3261 , CLnTCTECLnZ −⋅
=⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ⋅=
λλ
λ 121E+6 1.5E+6 2E+61/λ [m-1]
-
NEEM MURI Temperature Measurements Suggest that the Final Products are not Gasified
2500
3000
3500
[K]
erature
re t oint
t
2 32 3 3+ → +Al CuO Al O CuBurn Tube Propagation Rate ~ 1 km/s um BPure
(K)
Al/CuO
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Al/CuO
Tem
pera
ture
Equilib
rum Tem
pe
Measured Tempe
ratur
Cu boilin
g Po
in
Al 2O3 bo
iling
p
Al b
oilin
g po
intp g
Combustion Temperature ~ 2350±150 K
Equ
ilibr
i
Mea
sure
d
Cu
BP
Al2O
3B
Al B
P
Tem
pera
tu
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
erat
ure
[K]
m
ure
oilin
g Po
int
int
nt
3 2 32 + → +Al MoO Al O MoAl/CuO
Burn Tube Propagation Rate ~ 1 km/sCombustion Temperature ~ 2150±150 K ium o B
P
BPerat
ure
(K)
Al/MoO3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Al/MoO3
Tem
pe
Equilib
rum
Tempe
ratu
Mea
sured
Tempe
rature
Mo bo
Al 2O
3
boiling
poi
Al
boilin
g po
i n
35002 3 2 32 2+ → +Al Fe O Al O Fe
p
Equi
libri
Mea
s. Mo
Al2O
3B
Al B
P
Tem
pe
Al/F O
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
pera
ture
[K]
rum
ature
ling Po
int
boiling
point
ing po
int
2 3 2 32 2+ → +Al Fe O Al O FeBurn Tube Propagation Rate ~ 0.1 m/sCombustion Temperature ~ 1700±150 K
rium
e B
P
O3
BP
BPpera
ture
(K)
Al/Fe2O3
0
500
1000
1500
Al/Fe2O3
Tem
p
Equilib
rTempe
ra
Measured
Tempe
rature
Fe boil
Al 2O3
Al boil
Equ
ilibr
Mea
s. Fe
Al2
Al B
Tem
p
-
NEEM MURI Metal Oxides Vaporize or Decompose at Low Temperatures
2 212 → +CuO Cu O O
Compound Tmp(K)
Tbp(K)
Tvol(K)
Al 1687 3013 n/a 2 22 2→ +CuO Cu O O
2 3 3 4 213 22
→ +Fe O Fe O O
Al 1687 3013 n/aAl2O3 2345 3253 n/aCuO 1500 decomposes 1400
14 8000 14 1 104
2Fe2O3 1855 decomposes 1750MoO3 1075 1428 n/a
8
10
12
5000
6000
7000
n [m
ol/k
g]
V
Volume
Cu
O
Cu2O (l)
8
10
12
6000
8000
n [m
ol/k
g]
V [Fe2O
3 (s)
FeO (l)
4
6
8
2000
3000
4000
Con
cent
ratio
n [cm3/g]
OCu2O (s)
O2 4
6
8
2000
4000
Con
cent
ratio
n
[cm3/g]
2 3
O
Fe3O
4 (s) O
2
Volume
0
2
0
1000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
C
Temperature [K]
Cu2 CuO
0
2
00 1000 2000 3000
C
Temperature [K]
O2
-
NEEM MURI Temperature continues to Rise after Luminous Front Passes
Wave speed ~ 800 m/s
800m/s x 50μs = 40 mm
T still increasing,
Energy being released
1.2 4000const.1/lambda1/lambda^2
800m/s x 50μs 40 mm
~80
mm
Energy being released
Al/CuO
0.8
1 3500
1/lambda^2
nits
] Tem
t0 +14μs +28μs +42μs +56μs
Al/CuO
0.6
2500
3000
nsity
[arb
. un mperature [K
50μs
time
pix
Un-reactedtime
0.2
0.4
2000
Inte
n K]xels
0 1500600 650 700 750 800 850 900
Time from Trigger [micro sec]wavelength
pixels
wavelength
-
NEEM MURI Effects of Oxidizer vs Fuel Particle Size
Energetic Mass
Aluminum: nanoparticles (38nm) from Technanogy, micron-particles (2μm) from ValimetCopper-Oxide: nanoparticles (33nm) and micron particles (3μm) from Sigma Aldrich
Linear Burning Rate [m/s]
Mass Burning Rate [kg/s]
Burning Rate [kg/s]
Avg. mass per run [g] % mass Al2O3
Nano Al/ Nano CuO 977 3.79 3.14 0.31 17.1Micron Al/Nano CuO 658 4.77 4.72 0.58 1.0
micron Al - micron CuO
nm Al micron CuO
Nano Al/Micron CuO 197 1.31 1.08 0.53 17.1Micron Al/Micron CuO 182 2.02 2.00 0.89 1.0
micron Al / micron CuO nm Al - micron CuO
micron Al - nm CuO
nm Al-nm CuO
Linear propagation rate was more
dependant on the CuO particles size
micron Al / micron CuO
nm Al / micron CuO
micron Al / nm CuOnm Al nm CuO
22 212 OOCuCuO +→
micron Al / nm CuO
nm Al / nm CuO
0 200 400 600 800 1000Linear Burn Rate [m/s]
Evidence that the oxide decomposition drives convective burning Linear Burning rate [m/s]
-
NEEM MURI Al/MoO3 System has Similar Trend
Linear Burning Rate [m/s]
Mass Burning Rate [kg/s]
Energetic Mass Burning Rate
[kg/s]Avg. mass per
run [g] % mass Al2O3
Oxide Shell Thickness
(nm)Nano Al/ Nano MoO3 678 1.95 1.43 0.23 26.4 6.213Micron Al/Nano MoO3 362 1.54 1.51 0.34 1.7 22.26Nano Al/Micron MoO3 151 0.45 0.33 0.24 26.4 6.21
Micron Al/Micron MoO3 47 0.52 0.51 0.89 1.7 22.26
micron Al - micron MoO3
nm Al - micron MoO3
micron Al - nm MoO3
MoO3 vaporizes at relatively low temperatures
micron Al / micron MoO3
nm Al / micron MoO3 micron Al nm MoO3
nm Al - nm MoO3
temperatures. Reducing the size of
these particles promotes convective
burning
micron Al / nm MoO3
nm Al / nm MoO3
0 200 400 600 800 1000Li B R t [ / ]
burning nm Al / nm MoO3
Linear Burn Rate [m/s]Linear Burning rate [m/s]
reducing the oxidizer particle size has greater impact on increasing propagation rate
-
NEEM MURI Pressure Profiles for Mixtures of Al/CuO and Al/MoO3 with different Powder Sizes
20
30
MPa
]
20
30M
Pa]
1.82 [MPa/μs] 0.50 [MPa/μs] nano-Al / micro-CuOmicro-Al / nano-CuO
10
20
ress
ure
[M
10
20
ress
ure
[M
[ μ ]
00 0.0005 0.001
Pr
Time [s]
00 0.0005 0.001
Pr
Time [s] 1515[ ][ ]
10
15
MPa
]10
15
MPa
] micro-Al /nano-MoO3 nano-Al / micro-MoO30.44 [MPa/μs] 0.20 [MPa/μs]
5
ress
ure
[M
5
ress
ure
[M
00 0.00075 0.0015
Pr
Time [s]
00 0.00075 0.0015
Pr
Time [s]
-
NEEM MURI nNi-nAl Burning Rates
• Al + Ni → AlNi -1.38 kJ/g• Taf = 1912 K• Vertical glass tubes 2” in length
Material Manufact. Size (nm)
Morphology Purity (%)
Vertical glass tubes 2 in length • Ignited with Nichrome wire• Flame propagation measured with
Phantom 7.3
AlNi
Novacentrix 80 Spherical 80
Alfa Aesar 5-20 Spherical 99.9
Heat treatment performed on nm Ni powder in oven
at 250 °C
StoichiometryCombination
Molar RatioAl : Ni
Mass Percentage (%)Al : Ni
1 1 : 1 29.2 : 90.82 1 : 0.56 36 : 643 1 : 1.38 20 : 80
1.8
2
3
3.5nNi-nAl Burning Rates
Burning Rates after Heat Treatment
29% Al
1.2
1.4
1.6
2
2.5
3
0.8
1
15 20 25 30 35 40% Al
1.5
2
0 5 10 15 20Heat Treatment Duration (min)
-
NEEM MURI Our work has led to the following conclusions…
• Further evidence showing that the fast propagation rates in nanothermites are induced by the convective burning mechanism
• Increasing ambient pressure leads to decreased gas generation and a change in the propagation mechanismg g p p g
• Gas generation is due to decomposition of oxide particles
• Temperature rise takes place over a thick region• Temperature rise takes place over a thick region– Reaction relies on pressure, not temperature,
gradient to drive propagation– Need only heat mixture to point of gas generation to
propagate• Reducing the size of oxidizer particles seems toReducing the size of oxidizer particles seems to
increase rate of gas generation and promote convective burning
-
NEEM MURI Summary - continued
• Electrostatic self-assembly of nanoscale thermites into microspheres show improved mixing overinto microspheres show improved mixing over sonication.
• Nano functionalized colloids of metal oxides and• Nano functionalized colloids of metal oxides and graphene demonstrated to affect pressure exponent and burning rate. Nano aluminum affects p gburning rate.
-
NEEM MURI 2008-2009 Publications“Combustion and conversion efficiency of nanoaluminum-water mixtures,” Risha, GA; Sabourin, JL; Yang, V; Son, SF;
Tappan, BC, COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 12, 2127-2142, 2008. “Combustion characteristics of nanoaluminum, liquid water, and hydrogen peroxide mixtures,” Sabourin, JL; Risha, GA; Yetter,
RA; Son, SF; Tappan, BC,COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 154, 3, 587-600, 2008. “The effect of added Al2O3 on the propagation behavior of an Al/CuO nanoscale thermite ” Malchi JY; Yetter RA; Foley TJ;The effect of added Al2O3 on the propagation behavior of an Al/CuO nanoscale thermite, Malchi, JY; Yetter, RA; Foley, TJ;
Son, SF, COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 180, 7, 1278-1294, 2008. “Functionalized Graphene Sheet Colloids for Enhanced Fuel/Propellant Combustion,” Sabourin, JL; Dabbs, DM; Yetter, RA;
Dryer, FL; Aksay, IA, ACS NANO, 3, 13, 3945-3954, 2009.“Electrostatically Self-Assembled Nanocomposite Reactive Microspheres,” Malchi, JY; Foley, TJ; Yetter, RA, ACS APPLIED
MATERIALS & INTERFACES 1 11 2420-2423 2009MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 1, 11, 2420-2423, 2009. “Effect of Nano-Aluminum and Fumed Silica Particles on Deflagration and Detonation of Nitromethane,” Sabourin, JL; Yetter,
RA; Asay, BW; Loyd, JM; Sanders, VE; Risha, GA; Son, SF,” PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS, 34, 5, 385-393, 2009.
“Metal particle combustion and nanotechnology,” Yetter, RA; Risha, GA; Son, SF, PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 32, 1819-1838, 2009.INSTITUTE, 32, 1819 1838, 2009.
“Dependence of flame propagation on pressure and pressurizing gas for an Al/CuO nanoscale thermite,” Weismiller, MR; Malchi, JY; Yetter, RA; Foley, TJ, PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 32, 1895-1903, 2009.
“The effect of stoichiometry on the combustion behavior of a nanoscale Al/MoO3 thermite,” Dutro, GM; Yetter, RA; Risha, GA; Son, SF, PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 32, 1921-1928, 2009.
“Realizing microgravity flame spread characteristics at 1 g over a bed of nano-aluminum powder,” Malchi, JY; Prosser, J;Realizing microgravity flame spread characteristics at 1 g over a bed of nano aluminum powder, Malchi, JY; Prosser, J; Yetter, RA; Son, SF, PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 32, 2437-2444, 2009.
“Effect of particle size on combustion of aluminum particle dust in air,” Huang, Y; Risha, GA; Yang, V; Yetter, RA, COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 156, 1, 5-13, 2009.
“Exploring the Effects of High Surface Area Metal Oxide Particles on Liquid Nitromethane Combustion,” Sabourin, JL; Yetter, RA; Parimi, S, JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, submitted DECEMBER 2009.
“Oxidizer and Fuel Particle Size Dependence on Propagation Rates of Thermite Reactions,” Weismiller, MR; Lee, JG; Yetter, RA, PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 33, submitted DECEMBER 2009.
“Multiwavelength Spectroscopic Temperature Measurements of Thermite Reactions,” Weismiller, MR; Lee, JG; Yetter, RA, PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 33, submitted DECEMBER 2009.