neutronic and photonic analysis of the water-cooled pb17li test blanket module for iter-feat
TRANSCRIPT
Neutronic and photonic analysis of the water-cooled Pb�/17Litest blanket module for ITER-FEAT
G. Vella a,�, P. Chiovaro a, P.A. Di Maio a, A. Li Puma b, E. Oliveri a
a Dipartimento di Ingegneria Nucleare, Universita di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italyb CEA-Saclay, DEN/DM2S/SERMA/LCA, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Abstract
Within the European Fusion Technology Program, the Water-Cooled Lithium Lead (WCLL) DEMO breeding
blanket line was selected in 1995 as one of the two EU lines to be developed in the next decade, in particular with the
aim of manufacturing a Test Blanket Module (TBM) to be implemented in ITER. This specific goal has been
maintained also in ITER-FEAT program even if the general design parameters of the TBMs have reported some
changes. This paper is focused on the investigation of the WCLL-TBM nuclear response in ITER-FEAT through
detailed 3D-Monte Carlo neutronic and photonic analyses. A 3D heterogeneous model of the most recent design of the
WCLL-TBM has been set-up simulating realistically its new lay out and taking into account 9% Cr martensitic steel as
structural material. It has been inserted into an existing 3D semi-heterogeneous ITER-FEAT model accounting for a
proper D�/T neutron source. The analyses have been performed by means of MCNP-4C code running on a cluster of
four workstations through the implementation of a parallel virtual machine. The main WCLL-TBM nuclear responses
have been determined focusing the attention on power deposition density, material damage through displacement per
atom (DPA) and He and H production rate, daily tritium production and tritium production rate radial distribution in
the module. Moreover, the impact of using lithium at various Li6 enrichment on the TBM nuclear response has been
investigated. The results obtained are herewith presented and critically discussed.
# 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Breeding blanket; Neutronic; Photonic; Monte Carlo method
1. Introduction
The Water-Cooled Lithium Lead (WCLL) blan-
ket is one of the two European blanket lines
selected by the European Blanket Selection Ex-
ercise for a future DEMOnstration reactor [1]. The
European Fusion Technology Program has fore-
seen intense research activities on this topic and,
among them, the design and manufacturing of a
WCLL Test Blanket Module (WCLL-TBM), to be
tested in ITER-FEAT, seems to be the most
attractive one as its overall objective relies in the
evaluation of the nuclear, thermal�/hydraulic and
thermal�/mechanical behavior of the WCLL blan-
ket under conditions which are, as much as
possible, relevant to DEMO [2].
� Corresponding author. Tel.: �/39-091-232-250; fax: �/39-
091-232-215
E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Vella).
Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447
www.elsevier.com/locate/fusengdes
0920-3796/02/$ - see front matter # 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
PII: S 0 9 2 0 - 3 7 9 6 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 2 2 6 - 0
Within the framework of WCLL-TBM designactivities, a cooperation between the Department
of Nuclear Engineering (DIN) of the University of
Palermo and the Commissariat a l’Energie Ato-
mique (CEA) has started with the specific aim of
investigating the nuclear response of the afore-
mentioned module under ITER-FEAT working
conditions, finding out, at the same time, the
proper information needed to study its thermal�/
hydraulic and thermal�/mechanical behavior.
A detailed 3D nuclear study of the most recent
design of the WCLL-TBM has been performed
and the results obtained are herewith presented
and critically discussed.
2. Outline of the WCLL-TBM
The WCLL-TBM aims to represent the equa-
torial part of an inboard segment of the corre-
sponding DEMO blanket and it is expected to use
Pb�/17Li liquid eutectic alloy as breeder and
neutron multiplier material, sub-cooled pressur-
ized light water, under typical PWR conditions, as
coolant and reduced-activation martensitic steel as
structural material [2].The WCLL-TBM should be placed in one of
ITER-FEAT equatorial ports since from the
reactor first day operation till to the end of its
Basic Performance Phase. In particular, it has to
be cased in one vertical half of an ITER-FEAT
mid-plane port, being housed in a water-cooled
steel frame directly supported by the vacuum
vessel. Moreover, it has a poloidal height of 1.72m, a toroidal width of 0.514 m and a radial depth
of 0.585 m [2].
From the structural point of view, the afore-
mentioned module has a box-shaped structure
composed of a Segment Box (SB), a Breeder
Zone (BZ) and a cooling system.
The SB is a directly-cooled steel box having,
basically, the function of Pb�/17Li container. It ismainly composed of a First Wall (FW), two Side
Walls (SWs) and a Back Plate (BP). Moreover, it is
reinforced by toroidal and radial steel stiffeners,
which are intended to withstand the disruption-
induced forces and the full water pressure under
faulted conditions. The reference structural mate-
rial is reduced-activation 9% Cr martensitic steel,called EUROFER, similar to the commercial one
code-named Z10 CDVNb 91 [2].
The BZ, subdivided by the stiffeners in 12
poloidal sectors, houses the Pb�/17Li liquid eu-
tectic alloy (90% Li6 enriched) which is slowly
circulated from the top to the bottom of the
module, letting tritium extraction, purification
and Li adjustment to take place in specific unitsoutside the blanket [3].
The cooling system is articulated in two inde-
pendent circuits, one cooling the SB and one
cooling the BZ. The former is composed of 65
toroidal�/radial cooling tubes and two vertical
manifolds welded behind the BP, while the latter
is composed of a bundle of 35 double walled C-
shaped tubes (DWTs) maintained in place withone spacer grid located at about TBM mid-plane
level. Two coolant headers are foreseen for the BZ
cooling circuit, one for the inlet and the other for
the outlet water, placed, respectively, in the
bottom and in the top part of the module.
The SB cooling circuit uses tubes with inside/
outside diameters of 8/10 mm, while the BZ one is
composed of double walled tubes having inside/outside diameters of 11/13.4 mm for the inner one
and 13.6/16.5 mm for the outer one. A thin copper
interlayer, 100 mm thick, is adopted in both the SB
and BZ tubes as brazing material and tritium
permeation barriers are adopted in the last ones to
reduce tritium release in the coolant under the
safety-prescribed limits.
The coolant is subcooled water at pressure of15.5 MPa, whose inlet and outlet temperatures are
foreseen to be 315/325 and 303/325 8C, respec-
tively, for the BZ and SB circuits [2].
3. Models and results
A detailed 3D study of the WCLL-TBM nuclear
behavior has been performed with the MonteCarlo method, using the Monte Carlo N-Particle
(MCNP) code ver. 4C and adopting the FENDL2
transport cross section library [4,5]. In order to
speed up calculations and owing to the improved
multiprocessing capability of the MCNP code, the
analyses have been carried out on a cluster of four
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447440
workstations with heterogeneous operating sys-tems by adopting the PARALLEL VIRTUAL MA-
CHINE (PVM) software.
3.1. The model
In order to perform the aforementioned study a
pre-existing 3D model of ITER-FEAT, realisti-
cally simulating a blanket sector, has been
adopted. It represents 1/18 of the whole reactortoroidal extension (208) and it is delimited by two
proper reflecting surfaces located at toroidal
boundaries. The model describes in detail the
shielding blanket, the divertor cassette, the magnet
system, the vacuum vessel with its three major
ports and the cryostat. A proper D�/T neutron
source has been taken into account too.
A detailed 3D heterogeneous model of theWCLL-TBM with its steel frame has been set-up
and it has been inserted into the equatorial port.
The WCLL-TBM has been modeled in a fully
heterogeneous way, as appears from Fig. 1, with
few simplifications concerning the BZ tubes and
their collectors. In fact, the BZ cooling tubes have
been modeled as straight tubes without taking intoaccount their typical C shape and their collectors.
A particular attention has been paid to the
modeling of both SB and BZ tubes internal
structure, where a thin copper layer, 100 mm thick,
has been included to simulate the presence of the
brazing material.
The steel frame has been modeled as a homo-
geneous mixture of water and martensitic steel.Proper materials have been taken into account and
their macroscopic densities in operating conditions
are summarized in Table 1.
3.2. The results
The WCLL-TBM nuclear response has been
investigated, paying particular attention to neu-
tronic and photonic deposited power, tritium
production, helium and hydrogen production
rate and displacement per atom (DPA) in the
structural material.
The analyses have been carried out simulating alarge number of histories (10 000 000) and the
obtained results are affected by statistical uncer-
tainties lower than 3%.
3.2.1. Neutronic and photonic power deposition
The total power deposition in the module has
been evaluated in order to provide useful data for
the investigation of the WCLL-TBM thermal�/
hydraulic performances. It has been estimated
that the total power deposited by neutrons and
photons in the whole module is about 512 kW and
a detailed description of power deposition distri-
bution has been obtained. A summary of theseresults is reported in Table 2.
The deposited power seems to be decreased by
about a factor 2 with respect to the one concerning
the TBM previous design, conceived to be housed
in ITER-FDR [3], mainly due to the fact that the
Fig. 1. The WCLL-TBM model (midplane toroidal�/radial
section).
Table 1
Material macroscopic densities (kg/m3)
9% Cr steel 7760
Pb�/17Li 9510
Cu 8830
Water 727
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447 441
ITER-FEAT Neutron Wall Load (NWL) (0.78
MW/m2) is 0.62 times the ITER-FDR one.
In order to find out useful information for the
WCLL-TBM thermal�/mechanical study, a de-
tailed nuclear analysis has been performed aiming
to obtain the radial distribution of the deposited
nuclear power density both in the SB and BZ.
Since the variations expected for the deposited
power density in both toroidal and poloidal
directions are negligible with respect to the ones
foreseen along the radial direction, they have not
been investigated to reduce calculation time.
The radial profiles obtained are shown in Figs.
2�/5. As it was expected the deposited power
density reaches its maximum value near theplasma-facing region both in the SB and BZ,
decreasing in a quite exponential way along the
radial direction.
The radial profiles of the power density depos-
ited in the Pb�/17Li eutectic alloy, in the structural
material (SS) and water (H2O) of the SB and in the
top (TC) and bottom (BC) caps have been fitted
throughout the following functions:
q§Pb�17Li(r)�11:495 exp(�0:3866r)
�3:178 exp(�0:0732r) (1)
q§SS�SB(r)�3:286 exp(�0:1645r)
�2:7303 exp(�0:0616r) (2)
q§H2O�SB(r)�3:722 exp(�0:0799r) (3)
q§TC(r)�3:591 exp(�0:1978r)
�2:403 exp(�0:0694r) (4)
q§BC(r)�3:209 exp(�0:272r)
�3:607 exp(�0:0804r) (5)
where r represents the radial distance from the
TBM plasma-facing surface and it is expressed in
cm. The minimum correlation factor obtained in
the curve fitting is higher than 0.998.
Table 2
WCLL-TBM power deposition distribution (kW)
WCLL-TBM 511.9
Breeder Zone 333 Segment Box 178.9
Pb-17Li 303.9 First wall 116.9
DWTs 7 Side walls 45.7
Water 10.2 Back plate 1.3
Stiffners 11.9 Top cap 7.2
Bottom cap 7.8
Fig. 2. Power density distribution in the WCLL-TBM Pb�/17Li eutectic alloy.
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447442
Fig. 3. Power density distribution in the toroidal rows of DWTs of the WCLL-TBM.
Fig. 4. Power density distribution in the WCLL-TBM SB.
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447 443
The best fitting functions have been reported inFigs. 2�/5 in comparison with code predictions and
they are to be considered valid only in the range
2.65/r 5/55.50.
3.2.2. Tritium production
As one of the WCLL-TBM main goal is to test
the tritium breeding recovery and confinement
capability of such a kind of blanket line, the daily
tritium production together with the tritium pro-
duction rate density radial distribution have beeninvestigated.
The daily tritium production depends, ob-
viously, on the lithium enrichment of the Pb�/
17Li eutectic alloy and on the ITER-FEAT duty
cycle. Assuming a 90% Li6 enrichment and a duty
factor of 0.22, the daily tritium production has
been calculated to be about 14.9 mg/day, which is
in good agreement with the value calculated in [3]for the previous WCLL-TBM design, as far as the
different NWLs and duty cycles of ITER-FEAT
and ITER-FDR are considered.
The impact of Li6 enrichment on the daily
tritium production has been investigated too and
the main results are reported in Fig. 6. The results
obtained seem to suggest that the increase of Li6
enrichment has a strong impact on the daily
tritium production till the enrichment is lower
than 60%, while that impact decreases when the
enrichment becomes higher than 60%. In fact,
when the Li6 enrichment rises up from the natural
7.5 to 60% the daily tritium production substan-
tially doubles going from about 6 mg/day to a
value of 13 mg/day, while when it goes from 60 to90% a change of about 2 mg/day is predicted.
In order to provide useful data for tritium
permeation analyses it has been determined the
radial distribution of the tritium production rate
density, showed in Fig. 7.
3.2.3. Radiation damage
During plant operation, the highly energetic
fusion neutrons coming out from plasma continu-
ously interact with the structural material atomsinducing two main damage mechanisms for the
aforementioned materials.
The first mechanism is due to the displacement
of the atoms from their lattice positions as
consequence of collisions, while the second is
determined by the gas production as result of
Fig. 5. Power density distribution in the Caps of the WCLL-TBM.
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447444
various nuclear reactions mainly of (n, p) and (n,
a) kind. While the hydrogen isotopes diffuse out of
the metallic lattice or form metal hydrides, a-
particles remain trapped in the metal and generate
helium bubbles. These processes lead to unfavor-
able changes of mechanical properties (such as
embrittlement), limit the lifetime of the structural
material and affect their reweldability [3].
Fig. 6. Daily tritium production vs. lithium enrichment in Li6.
Fig. 7. Tritium, helium and hydrogen production rate radial distributions.
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447 445
In order to investigate the level of WCLL-TBMmaterial damage due to the first mechanism it has
been evaluated the DPA adopting the displace-
ment cross sections for iron taken from ASTM
standards [6]. Supposing a 0.22 duty factor reactor
operation during the whole year, it has been
evaluated the DPA distribution along the radial
depth of the WCLL-TBM SB structural material
showed in Fig. 8.In order to estimate the effect of the second
damage mechanism, He and H production rate
distributions have been evaluated too, along the
radial depth of the SB structural material. Fig. 7
reports the profiles obtained and it can be deduced
that, as a consequence of the ITER-FEAT reduced
NWL and duty factor, their maximum values are
lower (about one third) than the ones reported in[3].
4. Conclusions
A detailed investigation of the WCLL-TBM
nuclear response in ITER-FEAT has been per-
formed by means of 3D-Monte Carlo neutronic
and photonic analyses.
A 3D heterogeneous model of the new version
of the WCLL-TBM has been inserted into an
existing ITER-FEAT model accounting for a
proper D�/T neutron source and reduced-activa-
tion 9% Cr martensitic steel has been adopted as
structural material.
The main WCLL-TBM nuclear responses have
been determined, such as detailed power deposi-
tion density, material damage through DPA and
He and H gas production rate, radial distribution
of tritium production rate density and daily
tritium production in the module. Moreover, it
has been investigated the impact of using lithium
at various Li6 enrichment on the TBM breeding
performances.
The nuclear power deposition in the TBM has
been estimated to be 512 kW and its detailed
distribution has been evaluated too. A clear
reduction in the values of the aforementioned
variables has been found with respect to the
previous design, mainly due to the reduced
ITER-FEAT NWL.
Fig. 8. DPA per year in the WCLL-TBM SB.
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447446
As far as the radiation damage is concerned,both the DPA and He and H production rate
distributions have been calculated along the radial
depth of the TBM structural material, highlighting
that their maxima are, obviously, achieved in the
FW proximity where the neutron fluence is higher.
The maxima achieved at the end of 1 year of 0.22
duty factor operation have been estimated to be
about 11.8 and 35 appm, respectively, for He andH and about 1.05 for the DPA.
The daily tritium production together with its
production rate radial distribution have been
evaluated, observing that the former achieves a
value of about 14.9 mg/day.
At the same time the influence of the Li6
enrichment on the TBM nuclear response has
been evaluated, enabling to conclude that eutecticalloy enrichment in Li6 higher than 60% is
mandatory for a significant tritium breeding to
take place in the TBM, but highlighting also that it
can be optimized since a 90% Li6 enriched breeder
does not seem to be a first order necessity for the
WCLL-TBM.
A further improvement of the study could be
achieved modeling the real structure of the C-
shaped tubes and investigating the potential effectof the employment of innovative structural mate-
rials.
References
[1] L. Giancarli, G. Benamati, M. Futterer, G. Marbach, C.
Nardi, J. Reimann, Development of the EU water-cooled
Pb�/17Li blanket, Fusion Engineering and Design 39�/40
(1998) 639�/644.
[2] Y. Poitevin, L. Giancarli, A. Li Puma, J.-F. Salavy, J.
Szczepanski, Status of the design and testing programme of
the WCLL Test Blanket Module for ITER-FEAT, Rapport
SERMA/RT/01-3019/A.
[3] G. Vella, G. Aiello, M.A. Futterer, L. Giancarli, E. Oliveri,
F. Tavassoli, Water-cooled Pb�/17Li test blanket module
for ITER: impact of the structural material grade on the
neutronic responses, Journal of Nuclear Materials 258�/263
(1998) 357�/361.
[4] J.F. Briesmeister, MCNP, A General Monte Carlo N-
particle transport code. LA-12625-M, Version 4C (2000).
[5] M. Herman, A.B. Pashchenko (Eds.), Extension and
Improvement of the FENDL Library for Fusion Applica-
tions (FENDL-2), Report on a Meeting Held in Vienna,
Austria, 3�/7 March 1997, Report INDC (NDS)-373, 1997.
[6] Annual Book of ASTM standards, vol. 12.02 Nuclear (II)
Solar and Geothermal Energy, E693�/E694, 1994.
G. Vella et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 61�/62 (2002) 439�/447 447