neutron capture measurements for the weak s-process
DESCRIPTION
Neutron capture measurements for the weak s-process. Outline: Motivation Nuclear data needs for the weak s-process Results of (n, g ) cross section measurements (activation method) on 23 Na, 27 Al, 45 Sc, 58 Fe, 59 Co, 63 Cu, 65 Cu, 79 Br, 81 Br, 87 Br Conclusions and outlook. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhein der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
Neutron capture measurements for the weak s-process
Michael Heil
Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
Outline:• Motivation• Nuclear data needs for the weak s-process• Results of (n,) cross section measurements (activation method) on
23Na, 27Al, 45Sc, 58Fe, 59Co, 63Cu, 65Cu, 79Br, 81Br, 87Br• Conclusions and outlook
Motivation
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
• The weak s-component is mainly responsible for the production of the elements between Fe and Y. • Contrary to the main component of the s-process, the weak s-process is not so well understood.
• Since the local equilibrium does not hold for the weak s-process, propagation effects are expected. Therefore, one needs to know ALL neutron capture cross sections.
• Experiments: - Neutron capture cross sections are most important quantities but show large uncertainties.• Modeling: - most promising scenario is core He burning of massive stars M >10 M (⊙ 22Ne(,n)25Mg) - but also carbon shell burning could contribute (22Ne(,n)25Mg, 13C(,n)16O, 17O(,n)20Ne)
Effect of changing the cross section from 12.5 mb to 28.4 mb
62Ni(n,)
Motivation
ssolarr NNN
12N
Nlogε(A) log
H
A
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
• The weak s-process takes place in massive stars and is therefore also important for the r-process since it determines the composition before the supernova explosion.
• Reliable s-abundances are indispensable for determining the r-abundances via the r-residual method:
Sneden et al., Ap. J. 591 (2003) 93612
N
Nlogε(A) log
H
A
Nuclear data needs for the weak s-process
s-process abundances are determined mainly by Maxwellian averaged neutron capture cross sections for thermal energies of kT=25 – 90 keV.
Methods:• TOF: measure (En) between 0.1 and 500 keV by time of flight,
determine MACS for stellar spectrum
• Activation: produce stellar spectrum at kT=25 keV in laboratory,measure directly MACS
Problems: • small cross sections• resonance dominated • contributions from direct capture
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
Activation technique at kT=25 keV
• Neutron production via 7Li(p,n) reaction at a proton energy of 1991 keV.• Induced activity can be measured after irradiation with HPGe detectors. • Result: MACS at kT=25 keV
• Only possible when product nucleus is radioactive• Only MACS at 5 keV [18O(p,n)], 25 keV [7Li(p,n)], and 52 keV [3H(p,n)] • High sensitivity -> small sample masses or small cross sections• Use of natural samples possible, no enriched sample necessary• Direct capture component included
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
Results - neutron capture cross sections
Isotope MACS @ kT=30 keV in mbarn Bao et al. @ kT=30keV in mbarn45Sc 57 ± 2 69 ± 558Fe 13.1 ± 0.6 13 ± 1.359Co 41 ± 2 38 ± 463Cu 53 ± 2 94 ± 1065Cu 29 ± 2 41 ± 579Br 626 ± 19 627 ± 4281Br 241 ± 9 313 ± 1687Rb 16.1 ± 2.0 15.5 ± 1.5
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
Neutron poisons can have a large effect on the neutron balance during the s-process e.g. 16O(n,), 12C(n,), 23Na(n,), …
Isotope MACS @ kT=25 keV in mbarn Bao et al. @ kT=25 keV in mbarn
23Na 1.81 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.227Al 3.3 ± 0.2 4.1 ± 0.3
Results – weak s-process abundances
combined effect of 59Co, 63Cu, 65Cu, and 81Br
Stellar model calculations performed by Marco Pignatari
25 M⊙ star at the end of carbon shell burning
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
Background due to elastic scattering
• Old measurements possibly suffer from underestimation of background from scattered neutrons.
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006
PM
neutrons
C6D6
• We have measured the MACS of several light and medium mass nuclei.
• Old TOF measurements seem to systematically overestimate the cross sections.
• Many neutron capture cross sections are not known with sufficient accuracy.
• Neutron capture cross sections of all involved isotopes are necessary.
• Neutron capture cross sections of neutron poisons are also important.
• Future measurements:- Zn isotopes- Ga isotopes- Ge isotopes (no existing data)- Se isotopes (no existing data)
- also TOF measurements for MACS up to kT=90 keV
Conclusions and outlook
Michael Heil Hirschegg workshop, January 2006