networked learners
DESCRIPTION
Lee Rainie will present a keynote discussion on networked learning at the The Free Learning 2.0 Conference on August 22. The conference is "a unique chance to participate in a global conversation on rethinking teaching and learning in the age of the Internet."TRANSCRIPT
PewInternet.org
Networked Learners
Lee Rainie, Director, Pew Internet Project 8.22.12 – Learning 2.0 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @Lrainie
4 questions for educators to ponder in the age of networked individuals
1. What is the future of knowledge?
- Created? Disseminated?
2. What is the future of learning spaces?
- Physical presence? Collaboration? Alliances? Ownership?
3. What is the future of reference expertise
- Literacies? Search?
4. What is the future of community anchor institutions like schools?
- Knowledge economy/ecology?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
June 2000
April 2001
March 2002
March 2003
April 2004
March 2005
March 2006
March 2007
April 2008
April 2009
May 2010
May 2011
August 2011
Jan 2012
Home broadband Home dial-up
Digital Revolution 1 Internet (82%) and Broadband at home (66%)
71%
66%
Broadband at home – 66%
76% 74% 67%
58% 47%
21%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Millennials (18-34)
GenX (35-46)
Younger Boomers (47-56)
Older Boomers (57-65)
Silent Generation
(66-74)
G.I. Generation
(75+)
Networked creators among internet users
• 69% are social networking site users
• 59% share photos and videos
• 37% contribute rankings and ratings
• 33% create content tags
• 30% share personal creations
• 26% post comments on sites and blogs
• 15% have personal website
• 15% are content remixers
• 16% use Twitter
• 14% are bloggers
• … of smartphone owners, 18% share their locations; 74% get location info and do location sharing
56% of adults own laptops –
up from 30% in 2006
44% of adults own MP3 players –
up from 11% in 2005
52% of adults own DVRs –
up from 3% in 2002
42% of adults own game consoles
19% of adults own e-book readers - Kindle
19% of adults own tablet computer - iPad
Consequences for learning ecosystem
Volume Velocity
Vibrance Valence / Relevance
140% increase words consumed since 1980
Info consumption up from 7.4 hours a day in 1960 to 11.8 hours in 2008
Reading volume has grown 3X since 1980
100,500 words per day and 34 gigabytes
Broadband facilitates networked information
Links and multimedia
Self-paced learning
Analytics
Pervasive media
Big challenge for schools Atoms bits
Knowledge
rendering is
disrupted
Mobile phones – 89% of adults
331.6
Total U.S. population: 315.5 million
2011
Mobile is the Needle: 89% of US Adults Have a Cell Phone
Teen data July 2011 Adult data Feb 2012
% in each age group who have a cell phone
Changes in smartphone ownership
35%
48%
17%
46% 41%
12%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Smartphone Other cell phone No cell phone
May 2011 February 2012
Smartphones – 46%
66% 53%
35% 22% 20% 3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Millennials (18-34)
Gen X (35-46)
Younger Boomers (47-56)
Older Boomers (57-65)
Silent Generation
(66-74)
G.I. Generation
(75+)
Apps – 50% of adults
22% 29*
38 43 38*
43* 50*
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Download apps to their phone
Have preloaded apps on their phone
Total who have apps on phone
Sept 2009 May 2010 August 2011
Teens: Texting takes off and talking slips
6
19
22
29
35
39
63
11
22
15
20
32
19
6
20
20
13
17
26
12
3
23
20
11
10
3
5
39
20
39
25
4
25
26
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Exchange email with each other
Talk to people you know on a landline or home telephone
Exchange instant messages
Exchange messages through social network sites like MySpace or Facebook
Spend time with people in person, doing social activities outside of school
Talk to people you know on your cell phone
Send and receive text messages
Every day Several times a week At least once a week
Less than once a week Never/Cannot do this
Mobile connectivity alters learning venues and expectations
New access points to knowledge (AAA)
Real-time sharing, just-in-time searching
Augmented reality
Pervasive, perpetual awareness of social networks
Attention zones morph
Big challenge for educators People come to us We go to people
The school as
place becomes
the school
as placeless
resource
Digital Revolution 3 Social networking – 52% of all adults
9%
49%
67%
76%
86%
83%
85%
7%
8%
25%
48%
61% 70% 71%
6% 4%
11%
25%
47% 51%
52%
1%
7%
13%
26% 33%
35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
18-29 30-49 50-64 65+
% of internet users
318.5
197.6
155.7
85.1 78.4 42.0
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
Millennials (18-34)
Gen X (35-46)
Younger Boomers (47-56)
Older Boomers (57-65)
Silent Generation
(66-74)
G.I. Generation
(75+)
Mean size of Facebook friends network
Source: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, October 20-November 28, 2010 Social Networking survey.
Social media aids peer-to-peer learning by doing
Elevates DIY learning in soc.nets
Increases the role of social networks in learning
Facilitates rise of amateur experts
Changes character of soc.nets
Big challenge for educators Expertise and influence emerges in
networks and algorithms
Share the
stage with
amateur
experts
Information is Woven Into Our Lives
Mobile is the needle, Social Networks are the thread
Social Networks…
Surround us with information through our many
connections
Bring us information from multiple, varied sources
Provide instant feedback, meaning and context
Allow us to shape and create information ourselves and amplify others’ messages
Mobile…
Moves information with us
Makes information accessible ANYTIME and ANYWHERE
Puts information at our fingertips
Magnifies the demand for timely information
Makes information location-sensitive
Social networks and social media become more important in people’s
learning strategies
Consequences for learning ecosystem
What does this mean? 1) Social networks are more influential and are
differently segmented and layered
Sentries
What does this mean?
Evaluators
1) Social networks are more influential and are differently segmented and layered
What does this mean?
Audience = New media are the
new neighborhood
1) Social networks are more influential and are differently segmented and layered
New kinds of learners emerge
More self-directed Better arrayed to capture new info
More reliant on feedback and response
More inclined to collaboration
More oriented towards being nodes of production
Back to those 4 questions: How eductors can be even more valuable the world of
networked individuals
1) What is the future of knowledge? -- Shana Ratner (1997) “Emerging Issues in Learning Communities”
New:
Learning as a process
Knowledge is objective and
certain
Old:
Learning as transaction
Knowledge is subjective and
provisional
1) What is the future of knowledge? -- Shana Ratner (1997) “Emerging Issues in Learning Communities”
New:
Learning as a process
Learners receive knowledge
Old:
Learning as transaction
Learners create knowledge
1) What is the future of knowledge? -- Shana Ratner (1997) “Emerging Issues in Learning Communities”
New:
Learning as a process
Knowledge is organized in stable, hierarchical
structures that can be treated
independently of one another
Old:
Learning as transaction
Knowledge is organized “ecologically”-disciplines are integrative and
interactive
1) What is the future of knowledge? -- Shana Ratner (1997) “Emerging Issues in Learning Communities”
New:
Learning as a process
We learn best passively, by listening and
watching
Old:
Learning as transaction
We learn best actively doing and managing
our own learning
1) What is the future of knowledge? -- Shana Ratner (1997) “Emerging Issues in Learning Communities”
New:
Learning as a process
Our “intelligence” is based on our
individual abilities
Old:
Learning as transaction
Our “intelligence” is based on our
learning communities
2) What is the future of learning spaces?
Attuned to networked individuals/learners
• More self directed, less top-down
• Better arrayed to capture new information inputs
• More reliant on feedback and response
• More inclined to collaboration
• More open to cross discipline insights and creating their own “tagged” taxonomies
• More oriented towards people being their own individual nodes of production
3) What is the future of reference expertise?
“Embedded educators” in learning communities
• Teacher as scout for relevant material
• Reviewer and synthesizer
• Organizer and taxonomy creator
• “On call” for just-in-time information
• Organizational “steward” of bonding capital
• Organizational “steward” of bridging capital (especially to outside experts)
Good source: David Schumaker at
http://embeddedlibrarian.wordpress.com/
3) What is the future of reference expertise?
“Knowledge concierge/valet” in learning communities
• Teacher as modeler of social media creation
• Teacher as fact checker, transparency assessor, relevance arbiter
• Teacher as aggregator and curator – follow Jeff Jarvis rule: “Do what you do best, and link to the rest”
• Teacher as “node” in networks attuned to perpetual learning
Good source: Bill Densmore at http://www.informationvalet.org/
4) What is the future of community anchor institutions?
ALA
Confronting the Future
Strategic Visions for the 21st Century
Public Library
http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oitp/publications/policybriefs/confronting_the_f
utu.pdf
A short list of critical uncertainties
• Security of the internet
• Future of intellectual property
• Tolerance of ed systems (and accrediting authorities) for blended practices: online/offline, home/school, proficiency standards for individuals/cohorts
• The importance of new literacies and strategies for addressing divides
Your map is wrong
Thank you!