network design customer requirements network topologies cable choice hardware tsb 75 tsb72

30
NETWORK DESIGN

Post on 21-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

NETWORK DESIGN

Page 2: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Customer requirements

• Network topologies

• Cable choice

• Hardware

• TSB 75

• TSB72

Page 3: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Nature of traffic– Email– Video

• Security– Of data– Of closets

• EMI– Fluorescent lighting– Motors

Customer Requirements

• Site– Campus– Occupied– Listed– Run lenghts

• Future proofing– Bit rates– EMI– Security

Page 4: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Customer Requirements

• Cost– Installation – Maintenance– Long V's Short term

• Environment– Open plan– Office– Rearrangement

frequency

Page 5: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• CHOICE OF TOPOLOGY DEPENDS ON

– LAYOUT OF BUILDING

– AMOUNT OF EQUIPMENT TO BE CONNECTED

– TYPE OF EQUIPMENT TO BE CONNECTED

– PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

– COST

Network Topologies

Page 6: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• POINT TO POINT TOPOLOGY

– DIRECT CONNECTION BETWEEN TWO PIECES OF EQUIPMENT

Page 7: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• BUS TOPOLOGY

– NODES CONNECTED TO A

SINGLE WIRE

– PROBLEMS DIFFICULT TO

ISOLATE

– MAIN CABLE FAILS ENTIRE

NETWORK FAILS

– EASY TO MODIFY

Page 8: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• STAR TOPOLOGY– SEVERAL DEVICES OR NODES

CONNECTED TO A CENTRAL HUB

– RELIABLE– ONE MALFUNCTIONING NODE DOES

NOT UPSET THE REST OF THE NETWORK

– FLEXIBILITY– NODES CAN BE ADDED OR REMOVED

WITHOUT DISRUPTING SYSTEM

– MORE CABLE REQUIRED THAN A RING OR BUS TOPOLOGY

Page 9: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• RING TOPOLOGY– NODES CONNECTED IN CLOSED

LOOP

– DATA PASSED FROM NODE TO

NODE TO TARGET DESTINATION

– NODE FAILS - NETWORK MAY

FAIL

– ADDITION OF NODE ONLY WHEN

NETWORK INOPERATIVE

Page 10: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• PHYSICAL STAR

– RING

CONFIGURATION

– STAR TOPOLOGY

Page 11: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• COLLAPSED BACKBONE

– SIMILAR TO STAR

Page 12: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• SHARED NETWORK

Page 13: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

• SWITCHED NETWORK

Page 14: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Network Topologies

Page 15: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72
Page 16: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• UTP

• FTP, STP, ScTP

• Wireless

• Fibre

Cable Choice

Page 17: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Horizontal

• EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility)

• Not resistant to EMI

• Crosstalk

• Not secure

• Cheap

• Carries up to Gigabit speeds

• Distances

UTP

Page 18: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• FTP, STP, ScTP as with UTP but– Better resistance to EMI– Better resistance to Crosstalk– Needs grounding– More expensive (labour)

Screened

Page 19: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Shared 54Mbps channel

• Ease of installation

• No cable

• Susceptible to EMI

Wireless

Page 20: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Multimode

• Singlemode

• Secure

• Cost

• Distances

• Bandwidth

Fibre

Page 21: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Copper

• Fiber

• Multimode / Singlemode

• Future proofing

• Cost

Hybrids

Page 22: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Central component of star topology

• Regenerates and repeats data

• Extended distances

• Dedicated bandwidth– Switching

• Same media (e.g.. Ethernet)

Switch

Page 23: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Connects two LANs together• Routes data from source to destination• Reduces network traffic• Improves performance• Relatively high cost• Extended distances• Mixed media (e.g. Ethernet & token ring)• Mixed protocols (.eg. TCP/IP & Novell IPX)

Router

Page 24: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Zone distribution• Open office cabling

– Consolidation point• Must be at least 15m from telecomms closet• Should be limited to serving a maximum of 12 work areas.• Located is fully accessible, permanent locations

• Was known as TSB72 in EIA standards

Consolidation point

Page 25: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72
Page 26: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Zone Distribution

Page 27: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Advantages– Transition point allowed along 90m– Office divided into zones– Only short run at transition point moved when office moves– Less disruption– Less lost productivity– Work area leads can be lengthened if run is less than 90m– Is not meter for meter (see table)– Leads have higher attenuation

TIA/EIA-568-B.1 6.4.2Consolidation point (TSB 75)

Page 28: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

Patch leads

• The connection from the CP to the TO uses solid core copper.

• The option is available to use a stranded cable but the total maximum length of your link is reduced

• Stranded cable has 20% higher attenuation so the total length of your link must be reduced

• Option to use a 26AWG cable– 50% higher attenuation– must adjust figure in table accordingly

Page 29: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72

• Centralised Optical Architecture– Previously called TSB 72– Usually for fibre systems– Can use copper– 300 meter length limit (including patch cord in TIA/EIA version

only)– ISO have 3 link lengths of 300, 500 & 2000 m

• Also a number of application link lengths

– Electronics on one floor– Higher densities on hubs– Less space used

11801 and TIA/EIA-568-B.1

Page 30: NETWORK DESIGN Customer requirements Network topologies Cable choice Hardware TSB 75 TSB72