network based kernel density estimation for cycling facilities optimal location applied to ljubljana
DESCRIPTION
Network Based Kernel Density Estimation for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to LjubljanaNicolas Lachance-Bernard, Timothée Produit - Ecole polytechnique fédérale de LausanneBiba Tominc, Matej Niksic, Barbara Golicnik Marusic - Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of SloveniaTRANSCRIPT
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.1NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Network Based Kernel Density Estimation for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Nicolas Lachance-Bernard1, Timothée Produit1, Biba Tominc2, Matej Nikšič2, Barbara Goličnik2
1 Geographic Information Systems Laboratory, Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
2 Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubjlana
The International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications – Cities, Technologies and Planning,June 2011, Santander, Spain
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.2NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Plan
• Introduction
• Conceptual background
• Methodology
• Ljubljana case study
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.3NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Plan
• Introduction
– Cycling and Urban Planning
– Challenges and Needs for Optimal Location of Cycling Facilities
• Conceptual background
• Methodology
• Ljubljana case study
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.4NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Cycling and Urban Planning
• Cycling?
– Promoted as one of the most appropriate ways of urban mobility
– Environmentally friendly, require less space, impacts on health
• Planning?
– Importance of cycling facilities provision for cycling development
• Germany: 12,911km (1976) 31,236km (1996)
• The Netherlands: 9,282km (1978) 18,948km (1996)
– Stated preference surveys: Facilities discontinuities, route attributes
• Goal?
– Cycling facilities: Right places (O-D), right corridors (Flux)
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.5NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Optimal Location of Cycling Facilities
• Opportunities
– GPS: Portable, lightweight, unobtrusive and low-cost
– Planners: Insights of current and future behaviors (monitoring)
• Past studies
– Aultman et al. 1997 – Bicycle commuter routes and GIS
– Dill and Gliebe 2003 – Bicycle and facilities in USA
– Jensen et al. 2010 – Speed and paths of shared bicycle in Lyon
– Menghini et al. 2010 – Route choice of cyclists in Zurich
– Winters et al. 2011 – Motivators and deterrents of bicycling
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.6NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Optimal Location of Cycling Facilities
• Challenges and Needs
– GPS tracking visual presentation: data volume
– Direct usage of GPS data in the planning practice: lack of methods
– GVI: free enriched geographic data sources (i.e. OSM)
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.7NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Plan
• Introduction
• Conceptual background
– Examples of Current GPS Tracking Projects
– Ljubljana Investigation Background
– Kerned Density Estimation (KDE)
– Network Based Kernel Density Estimation (NetKDE)
• Methodology
• Ljubljana case study
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.8NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Examples of Current GPS Tracking Projects
• San Francisco (USA) – Smart phones
– Weekly prize draw
– “Developing” facilities instead of “building” them
• Copenhagen (Denmark) – Web-based GIS portal
– 3,000 trips mapped by citizen VISUM model
– COWI A/S GPS tracking: before / after facilities improvements
• Barcelona (Spain) – Qualitative / Quantitative
– Bici_N project rent-a-cycles video/audio
– Data transfert from station to central DB for further analysis
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.9NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Ljubljana Investigation Background
• Stated preferences (2008)
– Web-based portal Geae+
• Cyclist description, trip information
• Digitalization of trip
• GPS track transfert from enabled device
– Low-Tech: Paper over map drawing
• Revealed preferences (2010)
– GPS tracking device
• User friendly, low-cost, accurate
• Data transfert by technicians
• Broader investigation
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.10NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
KDE vs. NetKDE
• Kernel Density Estimator (KDE*)
– Operates in euclidean space
– Weights events by their radial distances from grid centroid
• Network Based Kernel Density Estimator (NetKDE*)
– Operates in a network constrained space
– Weights events by the distance from grid centroid measured along this network
* Density estimation function + Epanechnikow kernel function
NetKDE and KDE (2009-2011) by Timothée Produit, Nicolas Lachance-Bernard, Loic Gasser, Dr. Stephane Joost, Prof. Sergio Porta, Emanuele Strano
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.11NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
KDE vs. NetKDE
KDE NetKDE
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.12NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
KDE vs. NetKDE
KDE NetKDE
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.13NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Plan
• Introduction
• Conceptual background
• Methodology
– GPS Tracking
– Network and Grids
– Low Resolution KDE, High Resolution NetKDE
• Ljubljana case study
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.14NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
GPS Tracking
• Device
– Sport tracker QSTARZ BT-Q1300s
– 62 x 38 x 7 mm, 10m accuracy
– One button (On/Off), mini USB port
– KML, GPX, CVS
– Tracking: 5 seconds, 15h autonomy
• Data
– CSV SHP (WGS84) Merge Projection (UTM33N) [Manifold]
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.15NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Network and Grids
• Open Street Map Network
– Source: Cloudmade website
– SHP (WGS84) 10km GPS Buffer Projection (UTM33N) Places digitalization Highway deleted[Manifold]
– Topology (0.5m connecting/merging) + attributes cleaning[ESRI ArcGIS model builder]
• Grids
– 100m: Low resolution multi-bandwidths KDE
– 20m: High resolution specific-bandwidths NetKDE[IDRISI]
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.16NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Plan
• Introduction
• Conceptual background
• Methodology
• Ljubljana case study
– Resources, Data and Calculations
– Low Resolution Grid KDE Results
– High Resolution Grid NetKDE Results
– Discussion
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.17NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Resources
• Software / Hardware
– Postgres/PostGIS/Python/QuantumGIS
– Windows XP 64
– Intel® Core™2 Quad CPU Q950 @ 3.GHz 7.83GB of RAM
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.18NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Data and Calculations
• Low resolution KDE 100m 425km2
13,630 segments, 42,342 gridpoints, 442,260 GPS pointsKDE bandwidths
[200m, 2500m] 24 X 100m steps (2-3h)
• High NetKDE/KDE 20m 20km2
8,114 segments, 314,250 gridpoints, 423,748 GPS pointsNetKDE bandwidths
60m (17h), 100m (19h), 200m (24h), 400m (27h)
KDE bandwidths[40m, 100m] 7 X 10m steps[200m, 1000m] 9 X 100m steps (total 18h)
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.19NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
KDE results
100m grid
Bandwidths:
A)300m
B)500m
C)1000m
D)2000m
*Deciles distribution
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.20NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
KDE results
20m grid
Bandwidths:
A)60m
B)100m
C)200m
D)400m
*Deciles distribution
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.21NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
NetKDE
results
20m grid
Bandwidths:
A)60m
B)100m
C)200m
D)400m
*Deciles distribution
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.22NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Discussion
• NetKDE 20m (Visual analytics)
– 3:1 ratio - Shows flux corridors (a)
– 5:1 ratio - Smoothscorridors only (b)
– 10:1 ratio - Highlights axis and intersections (c)
– 20:1 ratio - Shows cyclist’smain area presence and main axis
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.23NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Discussion
• Research under rapid evolution…
– 3rd algorithm: Calculation optimization 90-95% (10h network-indexing, 5 min. for each steps)
– Current work on Barcelona, Ljubljana, Geneva, Glasgow, Baghdad
– Professional uses: Architects, Planners, Criminologs, Biologists
• Actual projects…
– Spatio-temporal and statistical analysis
– Fuzzy-map comparison (time, model, resolution, bandwidth)
– Testing Adapted Landscape metrics
– Testing HPC for calculation and subsequent analysis
– Prototyping the integration of NetKDE, KDE, MCA, … into SDI
NLB / 28.06.11 / p.24NetKDE for Cycling Facilities Optimal Location Applied to Ljubljana
Thank you!