neo pi-r standard - team focus · the neo pi-r. access to this information is restricted to those...

26
NEO PI-R Standard Technical Report Sample 1 ID 180-272 Date 30/09/2013

Upload: others

Post on 18-May-2020

18 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO PI-R Standard Technical Report

Sample 1

ID 180-272Date 30/09/2013

Page 2: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Overview 2 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

OVERVIEW

This technical report contains confidential numerical scale and item-level data arising from completion of the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy of interpretation by preventing misunderstandings of the data.

For test takers and assessors who are not qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R, the results have been analysed into two descriptive narrative formats as follows:

i) The NEO PI-R Personal Insight Report is a generic interpretation which describes typical behavioural style. It has broad application in a range of contexts.ii) The Primary Colours Leadership Report is designed to provide both test taker and test user with insights into the compatibility between the test taker’s personality and the tasks of leadership as delineated by the Primary Colours Leadership Model, a registered trademark of the Edgecumbe Consulting Group. It is intended for use as part of a supervised leadership coaching process and as a starting point for leadership development planning.

Structure of this reportProfile sheet

Table of scores

Scale details

Item-level analysis

Response statistics

Only qualified psychologists or appropriately trained test administrators should interpret psychometric test results. Please follow the relevant guidelines from the appropriate professional body.

Page 3: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Profile sheet 3 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

PROFILE SHEET

NEO Personality Inventory - Revised | StandardECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Domain Scores97 66 N Neuroticism

133 54 E Extraversion

159 73 O Openness to Experience

142 64 A Agreeableness

94 27 C Conscientiousness

Page 4: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Profile sheet 4 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

NEO Personality Inventory - Revised | StandardECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Facet Scores20 65 N1 Anxiety

14 57 N2 Angry Hostility

16 63 N3 Depression

18 65 N4 Self-Consciousness

17 55 N5 Impulsiveness

12 65 N6 Vulnerability

29 65 E1 Warmth

26 63 E2 Gregariousness

17 40 E3 Assertiveness

20 45 E4 Activity

18 49 E5 Excitement Seeking

23 52 E6 Positive Emotions

20 56 O1 Openness to Fantasy

32 75 O2 Openness to Aesthetics

27 63 O3 Openness to Feelings

23 60 O4 Openness to Actions

29 66 O5 Openness to Ideas

28 65 O6 Openness to Values

20 44 A1 Trust

23 59 A2 Straightforwardness

25 55 A3 Altruism

24 66 A4 Compliance

21 57 A5 Modesty

29 77 A6 Tender-Mindedness

15 22 C1 Competence

10 30 C2 Order

25 51 C3 Dutifulness

15 28 C4 Achievement Striving

13 23 C5 Self-Discipline

16 45 C6 Deliberation

Page 5: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Table of scores 5 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

TABLE OF SCORES

NEO Personality Inventory - Revised | StandardECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Scale Raw val Normed valDomain ScoresN Neuroticism 97 66

E Extraversion 133 54

O Openness to Experience 159 73

A Agreeableness 142 64

C Conscientiousness 94 27

Page 6: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Table of scores 6 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

NEO Personality Inventory - Revised | StandardECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Scale Raw val Normed valFacet ScoresN1 Anxiety 20 65

N2 Angry Hostility 14 57

N3 Depression 16 63

N4 Self-Consciousness 18 65

N5 Impulsiveness 17 55

N6 Vulnerability 12 65

E1 Warmth 29 65

E2 Gregariousness 26 63

E3 Assertiveness 17 40

E4 Activity 20 45

E5 Excitement Seeking 18 49

E6 Positive Emotions 23 52

O1 Openness to Fantasy 20 56

O2 Openness to Aesthetics 32 75

O3 Openness to Feelings 27 63

O4 Openness to Actions 23 60

O5 Openness to Ideas 29 66

O6 Openness to Values 28 65

A1 Trust 20 44

A2 Straightforwardness 23 59

A3 Altruism 25 55

A4 Compliance 24 66

A5 Modesty 21 57

A6 Tender-Mindedness 29 77

C1 Competence 15 22

C2 Order 10 30

C3 Dutifulness 25 51

C4 Achievement Striving 15 28

C5 Self-Discipline 13 23

C6 Deliberation 16 45

Page 7: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 7 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

SCALE DETAILS

N NeuroticismECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 97

Normed val 66

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [60 - 72]

Intensity and frequency of negative emotions 

E ExtraversionECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 133

Normed val 54

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [47 - 61]

Amount of energy directed into the external environment; need for external stimulation 

O Openness to ExperienceECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 159

Normed val 73

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [66 - 80]

Receptivity to external and internal sources of input 

Page 8: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 8 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

A AgreeablenessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 142

Normed val 64

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [57 - 71]

Role adopted in relationships; receptivity to the perspectives of others 

C ConscientiousnessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 94

Normed val 27

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [21 - 33]

Strength of purpose and drive to goal accomplishment 

N1 AnxietyECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 20

Normed val 65

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [56 - 74]

Apprehension; proneness to worrying generally 

Page 9: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 9 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

N2 Angry HostilityECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 14

Normed val 57

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [47 - 67]

Tendency to experience anger and related states such as frustration and bitterness 

N3 DepressionECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 16

Normed val 63

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [55 - 71]

Tendency to feel discouraged and dejected; proneness to emotions such as guilt, sadness, despondency and loneliness 

N4 Self-ConsciousnessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 18

Normed val 65

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [54 - 76]

Shyness or social anxiety; tendency to experience shame and embarrassment 

Page 10: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 10 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

N5 ImpulsivenessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 17

Normed val 55

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [44 - 66]

Tendency to act on cravings and urges rather than delaying gratification 

N6 VulnerabilityECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 12

Normed val 65

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [56 - 74]

General susceptibility to negative stress 

E1 WarmthECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 29

Normed val 65

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [55 - 75]

Readiness for interpersonal intimacy; interest in others; friendliness and cordiality of style 

Page 11: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 11 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

E2 GregariousnessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 26

Normed val 63

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [53 - 73]

Preference for the company of others 

E3 AssertivenessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 17

Normed val 40

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [31 - 49]

Social ascendancy and forcefulness of expression 

E4 ActivityECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 20

Normed val 45

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [34 - 56]

Pace of living and need to keep busy 

Page 12: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 12 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

E5 Excitement SeekingECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 18

Normed val 49

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [37 - 61]

Need for environmental stimulation 

E6 Positive EmotionsECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 23

Normed val 52

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [42 - 62]

Frequency and intensity of positive emotions; tendency to feel cheerful or exuberant 

O1 Openness to FantasyECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 20

Normed val 56

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [46 - 66]

Receptivity to the inner world of imagination 

Page 13: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 13 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

O2 Openness to AestheticsECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 32

Normed val 75

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [67 - 83]

Appreciation of art and beauty 

O3 Openness to FeelingsECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 27

Normed val 63

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [53 - 73]

Receptivity to inner feelings and emotions 

O4 Openness to ActionsECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 23

Normed val 60

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [49 - 71]

Openness to new activities and practical experiences 

Page 14: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 14 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

O5 Openness to IdeasECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 29

Normed val 66

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [57 - 75]

Intellectual curiosity 

O6 Openness to ValuesECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 28

Normed val 65

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [53 - 77]

Readiness to re-examine own values and those of authority figures 

A1 TrustECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 20

Normed val 44

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [36 - 52]

Belief in the sincerity and good intentions of others 

Page 15: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 15 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

A2 StraightforwardnessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 23

Normed val 59

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [49 - 69]

Frankness in expressing oneself 

A3 AltruismECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 25

Normed val 55

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [44 - 66]

Willingness to assist; active concern for the welfare of others 

A4 ComplianceECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 24

Normed val 66

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [55 - 77]

Prioritisation of harmonious relations over interpersonal conflict; tendency to defer rather than confront 

Page 16: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 16 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

A5 ModestyECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 21

Normed val 57

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [46 - 68]

Self-effacement; tendency to downplay own achievements 

A6 Tender-MindednessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 29

Normed val 77

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [64 - 90]

Sympathy with the human condition; compassion 

C1 CompetenceECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 15

Normed val 22

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [10 - 34]

Sense of mastery; belief in own efficacy 

Page 17: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 17 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

C2 OrderECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 10

Normed val 30

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [20 - 40]

Personal organisation 

C3 DutifulnessECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 25

Normed val 51

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [39 - 63]

Adherence to ethical principles and commitment to moral obligations; sense of duty 

C4 Achievement StrivingECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 15

Normed val 28

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [17 - 39]

Need for personal achievement 

Page 18: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Scale details 18 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

C5 Self-DisciplineECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 13

Normed val 23

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [14 - 32]

Capacity to begin tasks and follow through to completion despite boredom or distractions 

C6 DeliberationECG Corporate 2012 - T Score (50+10z)

Raw val 16

Normed val 45

Missing vals 0

Confidence interval [35 - 55]

Tendency to think things through before acting or speaking 

Page 19: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 19 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

ITEM-LEVEL ANALYSIS

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

N1 Anxiety1 No worrier (2) 3 61.5

31 Easily frightened (2) 1 2.661 Rarely fearful or anxious (2) 3 2.591 Often feel tense, jittery (4) 3 1.8

121 Seldom apprehensive about future (4) 1 2.1151 Often worry about things that might go wrong (4) 3 2.7181 Fewer fears than most people (2) 3 3.3211 Sometimes have frightening thoughts (4) 3 3.3

N2 Angry Hostility6 Often get angry at way people treat me (2) 1 2.5

36 Even-tempered person (2) 3 2.766 Known as hot-blooded, quick-tempered (4) 3 1.896 Not considered touchy or temperamental (4) 1 6.1

126 Often disgusted with people I have to deal with (2) 1 3.2156 Not angered easily (4) 1 7.3186 At times felt bitter, resentful (4) 3 2.7216 Even minor annoyances can be frustrating to me (2) 1 4.3

N3 Depression11 Rarely feel lonely or blue (2) 3 3.641 Sometimes feel completely worthless (4) 3 4.371 Seldom sad or depressed (4) 1 2.6

101 Have sometimes experienced deep guilt or shame (4) 3 3.7131 Tend to blame myself when anything goes wrong (4) 3 2.1161 Have low opinion of myself (2) 1 2.6191 Sometimes things look pretty bleak, hopeless (2) 1 4.2221 Too often, when things go wrong, get discouraged, feel like

giving up(2) 1 5.5

N4 Self-Consciousness16 In dealing with people, always dread making social blunder (4) 3 4.546 Seldom feel self-conscious around people (2) 3 3.376 Have been so ashamed I just wanted to hide (4) 3 3

106 Not much embarrassed by being ridiculed, teased (4) 1 4.5136 Often feel inferior to others (4) 3 3.1166 Feel comfortable around my bosses, authorities (4) 1 2.4196 If have said or done wrong thing to someone, can hardly

bear to face them again(2) 1 4

226 When people I know do foolish things, get embarrassed for them

(4) 3 2.9

N5 Impulsiveness21 Rarely overindulge in anything (2) 3 2.851 Trouble resisting my cravings (4) 3 281 Little difficulty resisting temptation (4) 1 3.3

111 When having my favourite foods, tend to eat too much (4) 3 2.6

Page 20: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 20 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

N5 Impulsiveness141 Seldom give in to my impulses (2) 3 2.8171 Sometimes eat myself sick (1) 0 2.8201 Sometimes do on impulse what I later regret (4) 3 3.1231 Can always keep my feelings under control (4) 1 3.1

N6 Vulnerability26 Often feel helpless and want someone else to solve my

problems(2) 1 3.4

56 Feel capable of coping with most of my problems (4) 1 3.186 When under great stress, sometimes feel I'm going to pieces (4) 3 3.5

116 Keep cool head in emergencies (4) 1 1.7146 Often hard for me to make up my mind (4) 3 2.7176 Can handle myself pretty well in crisis (4) 1 2.3206 When everything seems to be going wrong, can still make

good decisions(4) 1 3.4

236 Pretty stable emotionally (4) 1 1.5E1 Warmth

2 Really like most people I meet (4) 3 7.632 Don't get much pleasure chatting with people (1) 4 4.362 Known as warm, friendly person (5) 4 2.392 Many think of me as somewhat cold, distant (1) 4 3.6

122 Really enjoy talking to people (5) 4 2.7152 Find it easy to smile, be outgoing with strangers (4) 3 3182 Strong emotional attachments to friends (4) 3 4.5212 Take personal interest in people I work with (5) 4 2.5

E2 Gregariousness7 Shy away from crowds (1) 4 2.9

37 Like to have lots of people around me (5) 4 2.967 Usually prefer to do things alone (2) 3 3.297 Really feel need for other people if by myself for long (4) 3 4

127 Prefer jobs that let me work alone, unbothered (2) 3 4.7157 Would rather holiday at popular beach than isolated cabin in

woods(2) 1 4.5

187 Social gatherings usually bore me (1) 4 2.4217 Enjoy parties with lots of people (5) 4 3.6

E3 Assertiveness12 Dominant, forceful, assertive (2) 1 1.742 Sometimes assert myself less than I should (4) 1 472 Have often been leader of groups belonged to (4) 3 5.3

102 In meetings, usually let others talk (4) 1 2.4132 People often look to me to make decisions (4) 3 2.2162 Would rather go my own way than be leader of others (3) 2 4.3192 Tend to do most of talking in conversations (4) 3 2.5222 Don't find easy to take charge of situation (2) 3 4.2

E4 Activity17 Leisurely style in work and play (4) 1 1.947 Do things vigorously (4) 3 2.777 My work is likely to be slow but steady (4) 1 2.9

107 Often feel bursting with energy (4) 3 2.6

Page 21: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 21 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

E4 Activity137 Not as quick and lively as other people (2) 3 4.4167 Usually seem in hurry (4) 3 2.1197 My life is fast-paced (4) 3 2.6227 Very active person (4) 3 4

E5 Excitement Seeking22 Often crave excitement (2) 1 4.652 Wouldn't enjoy holiday in Las Vegas (3) 2 2.882 Have sometimes done things just for "kicks" or "thrills" (4) 3 2.9

112 Tend to avoid shocking or scary films (5) 0 2.5142 Like to be where action is (4) 3 1.9172 Love excitement of roller coasters (4) 3 2.6202 Attracted to bright colours, flashy styles (4) 3 3.8232 Like being part of crowd at sporting events (4) 3 1.9

E6 Positive Emotions27 Have never literally jumped for joy (1) 4 3.157 Have sometimes experienced intense joy or ecstasy (4) 3 2.587 No cheerful optimist (2) 3 3.6

117 Sometimes bubble with happiness (4) 3 3147 Don't consider myself especially "light-hearted" (4) 1 3.1177 Cheerful, high-spirited person (4) 3 1.7207 Rarely use words like "fantastic!" or "sensational!" to

describe my experiences(2) 3 4

237 Laugh easily (4) 3 1.5O1 Openness to Fantasy

3 Very active imagination (4) 3 1.833 Try to keep my thoughts realistic, avoid flights of fancy (2) 3 4.163 Have active fantasy life (4) 3 2.693 Don't like to waste time daydreaming (4) 1 3.5

123 Enjoy concentrating on daydream and exploring all its possibilities

(4) 3 3.8

153 If mind drifting to daydreams, usually concentrate on some work or activity instead

(4) 1 3.6

183 As child rarely enjoyed games of make believe (2) 3 6.9213 Difficulty just letting mind wander without control or guidance (2) 3 17.1

O2 Openness to Aesthetics8 Aesthetic, artistic concerns not very important to me (1) 4 5.5

38 Sometimes completely absorbed in music listened to (5) 4 2.868 Watching ballet or modern dance bores me (1) 4 3.198 Intrigued by patterns I find in art and nature (5) 4 4.4

128 Poetry has little or no effect on me (1) 4 2.5158 Certain kinds of music have endless fascination for me (5) 4 3.3188 Sometimes, reading poetry or looking at work of art, feel chill

or wave of excitement(5) 4 4.2

218 Enjoy reading poetry that emphasises feelings, images more than story lines

(5) 4 2.5

O3 Openness to Feelings13 Without strong emotions, life would be uninteresting to me (4) 3 3.143 Rarely feel strong emotions (1) 4 3.2

Page 22: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 22 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

O3 Openness to Feelings73 How I feel about things is important to me (4) 3 2.9

103 Seldom pay heed to my feelings of the moment (2) 3 2.8133 Experience wide range of emotions or feelings (4) 3 2.8163 Seldom notice moods or feelings that different environments

produce(1) 4 3.1

193 Find easy to empathise - to feel what others feel (5) 4 2.8223 Odd things – like certain scents, names of distant places –

can evoke strong moods in me(4) 3 3.2

O4 Openness to Actions18 Pretty set in my ways (1) 4 4.848 Think interesting to learn, develop new hobbies (4) 3 2.878 Once find right way to do something, stick to it (2) 3 3.9

108 Often try new, foreign foods (4) 3 2.3138 Prefer to spend my time in familiar surroundings (4) 1 3.2168 Sometimes make changes around house just to try

something different(4) 3 3.2

198 On holiday, prefer returning to tried, trusted spot (2) 3 3.7228 Follow same route when go somewhere (2) 3 3.9

O5 Openness to Ideas23 Often enjoy playing with theories, abstract ideas (5) 4 4.553 Find philosophical arguments boring (1) 4 3.183 Enjoy solving problems or puzzles (4) 3 3.8

113 Sometimes lose interest when people talk about very abstract, theoretical matters

(2) 3 4.2

143 Enjoy "mind-twister"-type puzzles (4) 3 1.8173 Little interest in speculating on nature of universe or human

condition(1) 4 3.3

203 Have a lot of intellectual curiosity (5) 4 4.1233 Have wide range of intellectual interests (5) 4 2.7

O6 Openness to Values28 Letting students hear controversial speakers only confuses,

misleads them(1) 4 5.4

58 Laws and social policies should change with needs of changing world

(5) 4 3.5

88 We should look to our religious authorities for decisions on moral issues

(1) 4 4.5

118 Other societies' different ideas of right and wrong may be valid for them

(5) 4 4.2

148 Loyalty to one's ideals, principles is more important than "open-mindedness"

(2) 3 4.6

178 Broad-minded, tolerant of other people's lifestyles (4) 3 2.7208 People should know what they believe in by age 25 (2) 3 7.4238 The "morality" of permissiveness is no morality at all (2) 3 4.7

A1 Trust4 Tend to be cynical, sceptical of others' intentions (5) 0 2.7

34 Most people basically well-intentioned (3) 2 5.164 Most people will take advantage of you if you let them (2) 3 4.294 Most people I deal with are honest, trustworthy (4) 3 3

124 Suspicious when someone does something nice for me (2) 3 3.8

Page 23: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 23 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

A1 Trust154 My first reaction is to trust people (4) 3 2.3184 Tend to assume best about people (4) 3 4214 Have good deal of faith in human nature (4) 3 2.3

A2 Straightforwardness9 Not crafty or sly (4) 3 4.5

39 If necessary, willing to manipulate people to get what I want (1) 4 369 Couldn't deceive anyone even if I wanted (4) 3 2.699 Perfect honesty is a bad way to do business (2) 3 4

129 Would hate to be thought of as hypocrite (4) 3 3.3159 Sometimes trick people into doing what I want (2) 3 2.1189 At times I bully or flatter so people do what I want (2) 3 4.8219 Pride myself on shrewdness in handling people (4) 1 4

A3 Altruism14 Some people think I'm selfish, egotistical (2) 3 2.944 Try to be courteous to everyone I meet (4) 3 2.774 Some people think me cold, calculating (1) 4 3.6

104 Generally try to be thoughtful, considerate (4) 3 3.7134 Not known for my generosity (2) 3 3.1164 Most people I know like me (4) 3 2.8194 Think of myself as charitable (4) 3 2.3224 Go out of my way to help others if I can (4) 3 2.3

A4 Compliance19 Rather cooperate with others than compete (5) 4 449 Can be sarcastic, cutting when needed (4) 1 2.879 Hesitate to express my anger even when justified (4) 3 2.9

109 If don't like people, I let them know (2) 3 2.6139 When insulted, I just try to forgive and forget (4) 3 4.4169 If someone starts fight, ready to fight back (2) 3 4.1199 Hard-headed, stubborn (1) 4 2.9229 Often get into arguments with family, co-workers (2) 3 2.3

A5 Modesty24 Don't mind bragging about my talents, accomplishments (2) 3 4.254 Rather not talk about myself, my achievements (2) 1 3.184 Better than most people, and know it (3) 2 3.8

114 Try to be humble (4) 3 4.2144 Have very high opinion of myself (2) 3 2.7174 Am no better than others, no matter what their condition (5) 4 12.7204 Rather praise others than be praised myself (4) 3 4.6234 Superior person (3) 2 2.8

A6 Tender-Mindedness29 Political leaders need more awareness of human side of

their policies(5) 4 6.7

59 Hard-headed, tough-minded in my attitudes (1) 4 2.589 We can never do too much for the poor and elderly (5) 4 3.2

119 No sympathy for beggars (2) 3 4.3149 Human need should always take priority over economic

considerations(5) 4 3.8

179 All human beings are worthy of respect (5) 4 3

Page 24: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 24 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

A6 Tender-Mindedness209 Sympathy for others less fortunate (4) 3 3239 Rather be known as "merciful" than "just" (4) 3 4.6

C1 Competence5 Known for prudence, common sense (2) 1 3.6

35 Don't take civic duties like voting seriously (4) 1 3.765 Keep informed, usually make intelligent decisions (4) 3 10.595 Often come into situations not fully prepared (4) 1 6.6

125 Pride myself on my sound judgement (2) 1 3.8155 Don't seem completely successful at anything (2) 3 5.8185 Very competent person (3) 2 3.7215 Efficient, effective at my work (4) 3 2.4

C2 Order10 Rather keep my options open than plan everything in

advance(4) 1 5

40 Keep my belongings neat, clean (2) 1 2.970 Not very methodical person (4) 1 2.5

100 Like to keep everything in place, know where it is (2) 1 2.6130 Never seem able to get organised (4) 1 2.2160 Somewhat fastidious or exacting (4) 3 4.7190 Not compulsive about cleaning (4) 1 3.8220 Spend lot of time looking for things I've misplaced (4) 1 3.1

C3 Dutifulness15 Try to perform all assigned tasks conscientiously (4) 3 5.945 At times less dependable, reliable than I should be (4) 1 3.175 Pay my debts promptly, in full (5) 4 2.3

105 Sometimes cheat when playing card games on my own (2) 3 4.3135 When I make a commitment, I can be counted on (5) 4 5.6165 Adhere strictly to my ethical principles (4) 3 3.4195 Try to do jobs carefully, so needn't be done again (4) 3 3.3225 Would really have to be sick to miss a day's work (5) 4 8.3

C4 Achievement Striving20 Easy-going, lackadaisical (4) 1 3.250 Have clear goals, work to them in orderly way (2) 1 3.180 When start self-improvement program, usually let it slide

after few days(4) 1 4.3

110 Work hard to accomplish my goals (4) 3 1.7140 Don't feel driven to get ahead (4) 1 2.2170 Strive to achieve all I can (3) 2 2.4200 Strive for excellence in everything I do (4) 3 2.3230 Something of "workaholic" (4) 3 3

C5 Self-Discipline25 Pretty good at pacing myself to get things done on time (2) 1 3.955 Waste lot of time before settling down to work (4) 1 3.385 Productive person, always get job done (4) 3 2.5

115 Have trouble making myself do what I should (4) 1 2.5145 Almost always finish started project (2) 1 2.8175 When project gets too difficult, inclined to start new one (1) 4 3.2

Page 25: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Item-level analysis 25 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

No. Item (abbreviated) Response Points Time (sec)

C5 Self-Discipline205 So many little jobs need to be done that sometimes just

ignore them all(4) 1 4.1

235 Have lot of self-discipline (2) 1 3.1C6 Deliberation

30 Over years, have done some pretty stupid things (4) 1 3.560 Think things through before coming to decision (4) 3 2.390 Occasionally act first and think later (4) 1 2.4

120 Always consider consequences before acting (4) 3 2.4150 Often do things on spur of moment (2) 3 3.9180 Rarely make hasty decisions (2) 1 7.9210 Plan ahead carefully when go on trip (2) 1 3.9240 Think twice before answer question (4) 3 6.6

(Auxiliary)241 Have tried to answer all these questions honestly, accurately (5) 4 3

Page 26: NEO PI-R Standard - Team Focus · the NEO PI-R. Access to this information is restricted to those who are qualified to interpret the NEO PI-R. This restriction maintains accuracy

NEO-PI-R | Response statistics 26 / 26

Sample 1Assessment date 30/09/2013 | Age 0;0 | Gender m* © Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford

RESPONSE STATISTICS

Step Distribution of responses

1 9 %

2 27 %

3 3 %

4 50 %

5 12 %