neighbourhood 2 0
DESCRIPTION
ITU Faculty of Architecture 5th Term ProjectTRANSCRIPT
NEIGHBOURHOOD
ILGIN HANCIO ĞLU020110194
2.0
//__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___I
ND
EX01___________________________________________________URBAN ANALYSIS
02___________________________________________________________FERIKOY
03____________________________________________________________PROLOGUE
04___________________________________________________________MUST HAVES
05________________________________________________________SITE DIAGRAMS
06_____________________________________________________________SITE PLAN
07_____________________________________________________________SECTION A
08_____________________________________________________________SECTION B
11__________________________________________________________SITE DIAGRAM
12______________________________________________________EXP. PERSPECTIVE
13____________________________________________________COMMUNITY CENTER
14____________________________PRINCIPLES OF EXPANSION & PERSONALISATION
15____________________________PRINCIPLES OF EXPANSION & PERSONALISATION
16__________________________________________________________FLOOR PLANS
17___________________________________________________________FOOD ROUTE
18__________________________________________________________________
19__________________________________________________________TREE HOUSES
20__________________________________________________________________
21__________________________________________________________________
Beyoğlu
BeşiktaşDolmabahçe
Ortaköy
Gayrettepe
Kabataş
Karaköy
Eminönü
Beylerbeyi
Şişli
Kağıthane
Harbiye
Feriköy
Eyüp
01__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_UR
BAN
AN
ALYS
IS
1946
The settlements create a gridal pattern
2014With the junction expansion and the tunnel the area became a trasportation point. The highrise buildings and the slums contrasts with the neighbourhood which is still ongoing on the gridal parts.
1966
First traces of irregular settlements
1982
With the junction; the area got closer to trasportation points
Junction expansion Highrises Gridal areaSlums
Main road with vehicle tra�c and a bus route
Streets with neighbourhoods
Ağaçlık alan
Tarihi İski binası
02__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_FER
IKOY
TODAY'S URBAN TYPOLOGY IS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES OF CAPITALIZATION OVER THE BUILDING LOTS. ON ONE SIDE, THERE ARE THE SMALL ENTREPRENEURS, CONTRACTORS INCLUDING THE LOT OWNERS IN THE SLUMS WHO CAN CONTROL VERY SMALL AND INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF LAND AND ON THE OTHER END, THERE ARE BIG GROUPS OF COOPERATIONS THAT HAVE THE POWER TO BUILD THOUSANDS OF SQUARE METERS OF COMPLEXES THAT CHANGE THE ENTIRETY OF A DISTRICT. THIS LEADS TO TWO DIFFERENT SPATIAL PATTERNS: FRAGMENTS OF 20TH CENTURY URBANIZATION WITH SMALL GRIDS ALONGSIDE GIGANTIC GATED SITES.
TURKEY, BUT ISTANBUL IN PARTICULAR IS EXPERIENCING THE MOST DRAMATIC PERIOD EVER IN TERMS OF URBAN RENEWAL OR SO CALLED GENTRIFICATION FOR THE LAST 10 YEARS. BIG CONTRACTORS ARE SWEEPING THE ENTIRE CITY WITH NO CONCERN OF HISTORY, CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT. THE CITY TOGETHER WITH ITS HABITANTS IS LOSING ITS MEMORIES OF URBAN CULTURE OR NEIGBORHOOD.
FERIKOY HAS ITS OWN CHARACTERISTICS AS A COSMOPOLITE SETTLEMENT JUST LIKE MANY OTHER PARTS OF OLD ISTANBUL. BEING CLOSE TO COMMERCIALLY DEVELOPED SISLI AND HOUSING TO AN INDUSTRIAL ZONE HAS EFFECTED THE DEMOGRAPHICS AS WORKING CLASS AND SMALL TRADE PEOPLE.HOWEVER, THIS STRUCTURE IS HIGHLY THREATENED BY THE URBAN TRANSFORMATION AS THE INVASION OF THE SKYSCRAPERS RESPECTS NO BOUNDARIES.
THE NEW HABITANTS OF THE DISTRICT ARE THE VERY RESIDENTS OF THESE SKYSCRAPERS SURROUNDED BY HIGH WALLS AND PROTECTED BY SECURITY CAMERAS. THEY ARE NOT ONLY PROTECTED, BUT ALSO PROHIBITED FROM THE LIFE OUTSIDE.
03__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___P
RO
LOG
UE
04__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_MU
ST H
AVES
1
2
3
Must be appropriated by its owners - but
still welcome outsiders
Opportunites for living in, workplace
and night life
Must bring together
people from di�erent ???s
Become a whole only with all its members
Must be shaped by its
owners
Must have some
servicesMust be a place where anyone
can a�ord to live in
Di�erent housing
types
Must have “imece”
(collective work)
Not only “bringing
together” but also “find something to do together”
Direct democracy
City-scaled regulations
for eathquake safety
Stand up to the
displacement of the poor
Black, immigrant and LGBT
citizens should be considered
Solidarity association
for the immigrants
Design for women, kids,
elders and handicapped
people
Solidarity association for women
Nursing homes for sick
and old members
Laundry rooms and
public kitchens
Parks, sportfiels and playing grounds, public spaces for each member of
the society
Enable to access cheap
and healty food
Enable people to make money
Must introduce
peopleMust create familiarities
Neighbourhood
Must be safe
05__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___S
ITE
DIA
GR
AMS
Municipality Investor Investor Structure
Investor InvestorStructure % x New habitants
Structure % x Municipality Municipality Community Center Community Center
Ateliers and ShopsAgriculture
Education
:Source of income
:Urban stage and auditorium:Exhibition hall:Library and living room
:Meet the needs of the structure:Meet the needs of the neighbourhood
06__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___S
ITE
PLAN
:Urban stage and auditorium
NEIGBORHOOD 2.0 A MODEST SOLUTION TO THIS ISOLATED AND NON PRODUCTIVE WAY OF LIVING.
A SELF DEVELOPING SYSTEM THAT SHELTERS HOUSING, EDUCATION, AGRICULTURE AND TRADE.PERFORMING LIKE AN ECOSYSTEM; YET IN CONTACT WITH THE CITY AROUND AND OPEN TO LIFE OUTSIDE AS THERE ARE NO WALLS AROUND TO BAN THE BY PASSERS.
THE COMPLEX CONSISTS OF A COMMUNITY CENTER FOR PUBLIC COURSES, ATELIERS, EXHIBITON HALLS AND AN AUDITORIUM. A GREEN HOUSE FOR SMALL SCALE AGRICULTURE AND A FOR ISKI CAFETERIA. A GROUP OF SHOPS AS WELL AS WORKSHOPS ARE LOCATED UNDER THE CAFETERIA. A VAST PUBLIC PARK HOSTS ALL OF THESE.
07__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___S
ECTI
ON
A
BRIDGE
LIBRARY
COMMUNITY CENTER
COMMUNITY CENTER
HOUSING
SHOPPING
GREENHOUSE
09__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___S
ECTI
ON
B
HOUSING
BRIDGE
LIBRARY
GREENHOUSE
11__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
SITE
DIA
GR
AM
HOUSINGCOMMUNITY CENTERGREEN HOUSECOMMERCIALISKI
12__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
EXP.
PER
SPEC
TIVE
13__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__CO
MM
UN
ITY
CEN
TER
14__
____
____
____
____
____
__PR
INCI
PLES
OF
EXPA
NSI
ON
& P
ERSO
NAL
ISAT
ION
THE SYSTEM FORESEES A PERSONALISED EXPANSION UPON CHANGING NEEDS OF THE HOUSEHOLD. THE STEEL SCAFFOLD ENABLES HORIZONTAL ADDITIONS AS TIME AND BUDGET ALLOWS, WITHOUT DETACHING THE CONTEXT. THE LAYOUT CAN BE DETERMINED BY THE USER WHO CAN ALSO CHOOSE DIFFERENT BUILDING MATERIALS, PROVIDED THAT THE INTERACTIVE AND SELF GENERATING WAY OF LIFE IS MAINTAINED.
15__
____
____
____
____
____
__PR
INCI
PLES
OF
EXPA
NSI
ON
& P
ERSO
NAL
ISAT
ION
16__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
FLO
OR
PLA
NS
17__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_FO
OD
RO
UTE
19__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
TREE
HO
USE
S
Let’s have tea up in my treeAnd see the world belowThere’s playing cardsAnd jars of jelly beansAnd candles all aglowWe’ve got a place up there up i the skyAnd though it’s really not that highIt’s somewhere, somewhere to goIt’s somewhere to go
Teahouse Treehouse by The Willow And The Builder
21__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
2014