need for a public doubled haploid facility ? thomas lübberstedt, candy gardner, mike blanco, uschi...

23
Need for a Public Doubled Haploid Facility ? Thomas Lübberstedt, Candy Gardner, Mike Blanco, Uschi Frei, Elisabeth Bovenmyer

Upload: priscilla-hampton

Post on 29-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Need for a Public Doubled Haploid Facility ?

Thomas Lübberstedt, Candy Gardner, Mike Blanco,

Uschi Frei, Elisabeth Bovenmyer

Structure

- DH Production in Maize: How ?

- Why (Doubled) Haploids ?

- Who uses DHs ?

- Need for a Public DH Facility ?

1) Haploid production

- In vitro versus in vivo

- Maternal versus Paternal

2) Haploid identification- Markers: Morphological or molecular- Cytological / flowcytometry

3) Genome doubling- Colchicine- Other

Technologies

In vitro: Anther Culture

In vivo Haploid Induction

F1

X

, ,F2

, ,

X

Maternal Inducer

+

, ,

+X

Paternal Inducer (ig)

Workflow & Bottlenecks Maternal DH Induction

Step Challenge

Induction cross - Inducer availability- Induction rate

Haploid (embryo) selection - Visual scoring- Background effects- Inducer DNA introgression ?

Genome doubling - Toxic Colchicine- Alternative procedures- Background effects

Selfing of double haploids - Chimera -> partial fertility

Identification of Maternal Haploids

Endosperm

Embryo

H embryo F1 embryoLethalOutcrossed or self-pollinated

Donor Inducer

Geiger 2009

Comparison DH Approaches in Maize

Approach Strength Weakness

In vitro - No need of inducer - Low induction rate- Genotype dependency- Need of tissue culture

In vivo – paternal - Simple inheritance- cms conversion

- Low induction rate (2%)

In vivo – maternal -Limited genotype dependency- Induction rate (10%)

- Background effects-Complex inheritance

Why (Doubled) Haploids ?

Speed in Line Development

Founder line 1 x Founder line 2

F1Selfing

Inbred line

DH

Inbred line

Haploid Induction & Doubling of Allelic Diversity Materials

Andrew Smelser et al., Plant Introduction Station, Ames

QTL MAPPINGType of

PopulationStrength Weakness

F2:3- Speed of production- d and a estimates

- Heterogeneous families

RIL - Homogeneous families- Power of QTL detection

- Slow production

DH - Speed of producing homogeneous families- Power of QTL detection

- Laborious production process- Lower recombination (>RIL)

BC - Speed of production - Heterogeneous families- a and d confounded

Trait / Gene Stacking

X

Line 1 Line 2

or

Selfing (F2) DH Induction

Goal: Fixation of target alleles

No. of genes F2 DH

1 0.25 0.5

2 0.0625 0.25

4 0.004 0.0625

8 0.00002 0.004

16 0.00000000002 0.00002

Probability for Fixation of Target Genes

Usefulness in Line Development

Seitz 2005

Rapid Line & Population Improvement

Gordillo & Geiger 2008

Conclusions

- Homozygous lines are obtained in short time

- Maximal genetic variation among lines: increased selection gain

- Reduces population size for gene pyramiding substantially

- Increases power for QTL or QTP detection

- Increases labor for line development – depending on technology

Who uses DHs ?

DH Application in Plant Breeding

Maize: All major breeding companies (in vivo DH induction)

Tuvesson et al. 2007, EU-COST

Other species (Tuvesson et al.): Rye, Oat, Triticale, Potato, Cabbage

Need for Public DH Facility ?

Pro and Contra Public DH Facility (Maize)

Contra:- Inducers are available in maize - Procedures are published-> Everyone can do it

Pro:- Users might need DH materials only once or once in a while- Induction procedure requires know how (analogy to transformation)

- Technology advance might make procedure more accessible- Possible platform for expansion into other species=> Research opportunities in maize and other species

And: Training of future plant breeders !! Technology & Application of DHs

Technological Challenges

Colored Seed

Smelser et al. 2009

Partial Fertile

Questions relating to inducer:

- Alternative/improved marker systems- Increased induction rate- Adaptation to US climate / photoperiod- Genetics / biology of induction mechanism

Questions relating to genome doubling:

- Genetic background effect ?- Optimized procedure (with colchicine)- Procedure without colchicine ?- Increased doubling / success rate

Conclusion

Successful example of research oriented service facility at ISU:

http://www.agron.iastate.edu/ptf/index.aspx

New DH facility at ISU will soon be launched, if interested contact:

Thomas Lü[email protected]

Collaborators:Candy Gardner, Mike Blanco, Uschi Frei

Costs ?Service On Campus Fee Off Campus Fee

a) Haploid Seed Induction

a) Selected Haploid Seed

a) Doubled Haploid Seed Production (5-20 kernels)

a) Doubled Haploid Line (200 kernels)

- Summer / Winter pricing

- GM seed ?