nbcc 05 professor saatcioglu
DESCRIPTION
NBCCTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Structural Design For Earthquake Structural Design For Earthquake Loads as per NBCCLoads as per NBCC--20052005
Murat Saatcioglu PhD,P.Eng.Professor and University Research ChairDepartment of Civil EngineeringThe University of OttawaOttawa, ON
![Page 2: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Seismic Response
-400-300-200-100
0100200300400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (sec)
Acce
lera
tion
(cm
/s2 )
Earthquake forces are different than gravity and wind loads. They are internally generated inertia forces caused by the acceleration of ground motion and the building mass.
![Page 3: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Performance CriterionBuildings will be designed to maintain their structural integrity and ensure life-safety in the event of a strong earthquake, even though they may be damaged substantially beyond repair.
Buildings will be designed to survive a medium seismic event with some repairable damage.
Buildings will be designed to survive a low level seismic event without damage.
Post-disaster buildings are expected to remain operational after a strong earthquake.
![Page 4: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
General Design RequirementsThe structures shall have a clearly defined Seismic Force Resisting Systems (SFRS) which will be designed for 100% of the earthquake loads and their effects.
All structural framing systems not part of SFRS must be designed to behave either elastically or with sufficient ductility to maintain their gravity load carrying capacities during the earthquake (as they go for the ride).
Non-structural elements shall be either isolated or integrated.
![Page 5: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Provides maximum spectral acceleration for a 5% damped SDOF system of selected periods, Sa(T)
Spectral values derived for a uniform probability of exceedance, 2% in 50 years
Uniform Hazard Spectra reflects differences in spectral shapes in different regions.
Earthquake Hazard (UHS)
![Page 6: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Uniform Hazard Spectra (UHS)
![Page 7: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
For T ≤ 0.2 sec S(T) = Fa Sa(0.2)
S(T) = Fv Sa(0.5) or
For T = 0.5 sec S(T) = Fa Sa(0.2) . whichever is smaller
For T = 1.0 sec S(T) = Fv Sa(1.0)
For T = 2.0 sec S(T) = Fv Sa(2.0)
For T ≥ 4.0 sec S(T) = Fv Sa(2.0)/2
Design Spectral Values
![Page 8: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Table 4.1.8.4.A.Site Classification for Seismic Site Response
Forming Part of Sentences 4.1.8.4.(2) and (3)
Average Properties in Top 30 m as per Appendix A
Site Class
Soil Profile Name
Soil Shear Wave Average Velocity, V s
(m/s)
Standard Penetration
Resistance, N 60
Soil Undrained Shear Strength, su
A Hard Rock V s > 1500 Not applicable Not applicable B Rock 760 < V s .1500 Not applicable Not applicable C Very Dense Soil
and Soft Rock 360 < V s < 760 N 60 > 50 su > 100kPa
D Stiff Soil 180 < V s < 360 15 < N 60 < 50 50 < su < 100kPa
E Soft Soil V s <180 N 60 < 15 su < 50kPa E Any profile with more than 3 m of soil with the following
characteristics: • Plastic index PI > 20 • Moisture content w >= 40%, and • Undrained shear strength su < 25 kPa
F (1) Others Site Specific Evaluation Required
Notes to Table 4.1.8.4.A (1) Other soils include: a) Liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, collapsible weakly cemented soils, and other soils susceptible to failure or collapse under seismic loading. b) Peat and/or highly organic clays greater than 3 m in thickness. c) Highly plastic clays (PI > 75) with thickness greater than 8 m. d) Soft to medium stiff clays with thickness greater than 30 m.
![Page 9: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Values of Fa as a Function of Site Class and T = 0.2 s Spectral Acceleration.
Values of Fa Site Class Sa(0.2)≤
0.25 Sa(0.2) =
0.50 Sa(0.2) =
0.75 Sa(0.2) =1.00
Sa(0.2) = 1.25
A 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 D 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 E 2.1 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 F Site specific investigation required
Acceleration-Based Site Coefficients
![Page 10: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Values of Fv as a Function of Site Class and T = 1.0 s Spectral Acceleration.
Values of Fv Site Class Sa(1.0) <
0.1 Sa(1.0) =
0.2 Sa(1.0) =
0.3 Sa(1.0)
=0.4 Sa(1.0) >
0.5 A 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 B 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 D 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 E 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.7 F Site specific investigation required
Velocity-Based Site Coefficients
![Page 11: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ie = 0.8 Low occupancy
Ie = 1.3 Buildings used as post disaster shelters, such as, schools and community centres, and manufacturing facilities containing toxic, explosive or hazardous substances
Ie = 1.5 Buildings used for post-disaster recovery, such as, hospitals, telephone exchanges, generating stations, fire and police stations, water and sewage treatment facilities
Ie = 1.0 All other buildings
Importance Factor
![Page 12: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Design Spectral Values as Adjusted for Building
Importance
Ie Fa Sa(T)5% Damped Spectral Acceleration for Reference Soil ConditionsModification Factor
for Site Soil Conditions
Modification Factor for Building Importance
![Page 13: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Method of Analysis
Dynamic Analysis (Preferred Method)
• Elastic Spectral Analysis
• Elastic Time History Analysis
• Inelastic Time History Analysis
Equivalent Static Force Procedure
![Page 14: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Structures located in zones of low seismicity, Ie Fa Sa(0.2) < 0.35, or
Regular structures that are less than 60 m in height and have Ta < 2 s, where Ta is the fundamental period, or
Irregular structures that are less than 20 m in height, have Ta < 0.5 s and are not torsionally sensitive
Equivalent Static Force ProcedureMay be used for:
![Page 15: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
3-Storey Frame Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
Modes of Vibration
![Page 16: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Ft
V
Equivalent Static Force Procedure
Although seismic action is dynamic in nature, building codes often recommend “Equivalent Static Load Analysis”for simplicity, based on first mode response, as modified empirically for higher mode effects.
![Page 17: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Ve
Ve /Rd Ro
Ve /Rd
Δ
W: Weight of the structure contributing to inertia forces (D+0.25L+06LS)
Ta: Fundamental PeriodMv: Higher mode factorIE: Importance FactorRd: Ductility related force
modification factorRo: Oversterngth related force
modification factor
od
Eva
RRWI)MS(TV =
Equivalent Static Force
![Page 18: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
od
E
RRWS(2.0)IV ≥
For Rd ≥ 1.5, V need not exceed:
Because of uncertainties associated with UHS values for Ta > 2.0 sec, V is not reduced beyond the value at S(2.0)
od
E
RRWS(0.2)I
32V ≤
Cut-off Values
![Page 19: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fundamental Period (Ta) For Steel Moment Frames: Ta = 0.085 (hn)3/4
For Concrete Moment Frames: Ta = 0.075 (hn)3/4
For other Moment Frames: Ta = 0.1 N
For Braced Frames: Ta = 0.025 (hn)
For Shear Wall Buildings: Ta = 0.05 (hn)3/4
![Page 20: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
R/C MRF Buildings
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Height hn, m
Perio
d T,
sec
T= 0.075 (hn)3/4
Measured Versus NBCC-05 (Ta)
![Page 21: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
R/C Shear Wall Buildings
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00
Height, hn (m)
Perio
d, T
(sec
)
T = 0.05 hn3/4
Measured Versus NBCC-05 (Ta)
![Page 22: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
R/C Shear Wall Buildings
T = 0.09 hn / D1/2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
H / D1/2
Perio
d, T
(sec
)
Measured Versus NBCC-95 (Ta)
![Page 23: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Fundamental Period (Ta)
The use of more accurate methods of mechanics is permitted by NBCC – 2005 (Ex: Rayleigh’s Method)
provided the values do not exceed 1.5 times those obtained by the empirical expressions
The above limit can be justified because of:
• Uncertainties associated with the participation ofnon-structural elements
• Possible inaccuracies in analytical modelling
• Differences between design and as-built conditions
For frame structures:
![Page 24: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
6.0 m6.0 m6.0 m6.0 m6.0 m
30 .0 m
6.0 m
Effect of Participating Infill Masonry Walls
![Page 25: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
3 @ 6 m = 18 m 3 @ 6 m = 18 m 3 @ 6 m = 18 m
Effect of Participating Infill Masonry Walls
![Page 26: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Wall-to-floor area ratio (%)
Perio
d, T
(sec
)
5-storey building10-storey building15 storey buildingNBCC (5 storeys)
NBCC (10 storeys)NBCC (15 storeys)
Effect of Participating Infill Masonry Walls
![Page 27: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Fundamental Period (Ta)
The use of more accurate methods of mechanics is permitted by NBCC – 2005 (Ex: Rayleigh’s Method)
provided the values do not exceed 2.0 times those obtained by the empirical expressions .
For braced frames and shear-wall structures:
The above can be justified because of:• Improved accuracy of analytical models for braced
frames and shear walls, which dominate the structural response
• Improved correlation of computed and measuredperiod values
![Page 28: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5Computed Period (sec)
Mea
sure
d Pe
riod
(sec
)
Shear Wall Buildings
Fundamental Period (Ta)
![Page 29: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Rd – Ductility Related Force Modification Factor
1.0 ≤ Rd ≤ 5.0
Established by tests, non-linear analysis of structural systems and field assessment of actual structural behaviour.
Indicates the ability of structure to undergo deformations beyond yielding without a significant loss of strength, while dissipating energy under hysteretic loading
![Page 30: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Park and Paulay (1975) and Paulay and Priestley (1992) found that Rd ≤ 5 in multi-degree-of-freedom structures.
Because of the field observations after the 1985 Mexico City E.Q., the Mexico Code (1987) reduced “Q” factor (Rd) from 6.0 to 4.0.
2001 draft of Eurocode 8 (ECS 1998) recommends a “q” factor (Rd) to vary between 1.0 and 5.0
Rd – Ductility Related Force Modification Factor
![Page 31: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Rd – Ductility Related Force Modification Factor
In order for the structure to have sufficient ductility and energy absorption capacity, consistent with the Rd used in design, the structure must conform to:
• Relevant CSA Standard
• The Capacity Design requirements
![Page 32: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Building with Lateral Deformability Building that suffered failure
due to lack of deformability
![Page 33: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Ro – Overstrength Related Force Modification Factor
Structures, particularly the more ductile ones can
have considerable reserve strength not explicitly
considered in NBCC - 1995
Old Codes have attempted to calibrate seismic
design force levels to historical levels deemed
appropriate (i.e., U factor)
![Page 34: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Ro – Overstrength Related Force Modification Factor
NBCC – 2005 Explicitly accounts for overstrength in structures
Only dependable or minimum overstrength is considered
Ro = Rsize ⋅ Rφ ⋅ Ryield ⋅ Rsh ⋅ Rmech
![Page 35: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Rsize – OverstrengthRelated to Member Size
Standard member sizes used in practice result in overstrength, i.e., restricted sizes of steel shapes, plates, re-bars, timber and masonry elements.
Practical design considerations often lead to conservative rounding of elements, such as spacing of connectors and reinforcing elements.
Rsize = 1.05 for R/C structures 1.05 to 1.10 for structural steel
1.05 to 1.15 for timber and masonry
![Page 36: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Rφ – Overstrength Related to Material Resistance (φ) Factors
It is appropriate to use nominal resistances when designing for an extremely rare event, such as an earthquake with a return period of 2500 years.
Rφ = 1/φφ Rφ
R/C and RM 0.85 1.18
Structural Steel 0.90 1.11
Timber 0.70 1.43
URM 1.00 1.00
![Page 37: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Ryield – Overstrength Related to Actual Yield Strength
Ryield reflects the ratio of actual steel yield strength to
specified design yield strength.
Ryield = 1.05 for re-bars (Mirza and MacGregor 1979)
1.10 for structural steel (Schmidt and Bartlett 2002)
1.00 for timber
![Page 38: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Rsh – Overstrength Related to Strain Hardening of Steel
Rsh reflects the effect of steel strain hardening in post-yield region. Therefore, it depends on the degree of
inelasticity expected (Rd).
Rsh = 1.10 to 1.25 for R/C structures 1.05 to 1.30 for structural steel
1.05 for timber1.00 for reinforced masonry
![Page 39: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Rmech – Overstrength Caused by Continuity and Redundancy
Rmech accounts for the additional resistance that can be developed before a collapse mechanism forms in the structure.
Rmech increases with the degree of indeterminacy and redundancy. It can be high in R/C structures where continuity is more prevalent as opposed to steel structures where pin-ended members are common.
![Page 40: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
cf cf
bf bf
1
1
Elastic Behaviour
![Page 41: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Beam Yielding
1
2
by by
2
![Page 42: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Beams and Columns @ Capacity
bu bu
3
cu cu
1
2
3
![Page 43: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Rmech – Overstrength Caused by Continuity and Redundancy
A value of 1.0 or a value close to 1.0 may be used as a conservative estimate for Rmech
Rmech
Ductile Plate Walls 1.10
Ductile R/C MRF 1.05
Ductile Coupled Walls 1.05
Ductile Partial Coupled Walls 1.05
Rmech = 1.00 Except for;
![Page 44: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
R/C Structures Rd RoDuctile moment-resisting frames 4.0 1.7Moderately ductile moment-resisting frames
2.5 1.4
Ductile coupled walls 4.0 1.7Ductile partially coupled walls 3.5 1.7Ductile shear walls 3.5 1.6Moderately ductile shear walls 2.0 1.4Conventional construction
•Moment-resisting frames•Shear walls
1.51.5
1.31.3
Other concrete SFRS(s) not listed above
1.0 1.0
![Page 45: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Distribution of Base Shear
( )
3.6T for 0.25VF3.6T0.7for V0.07TF0.7T for 0F
FVhW
hWF
at
aat
at
tii
iii
≥=<<=≤=
−=∑
![Page 46: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Overturning Moments
![Page 47: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Overturning MomentsFirst mode distribution gives the highest overturning moments. The equivalent force approach is based on first mode behaviour.
Moments become smaller when higher mode effects are considered. Therefore, the adjustment factor J is applied to the base overturning moment to account for higher mode effects.
∑=
−=n
1ixiixx )h(hFJM ( ) nx
n
xx
nxx
h.hhh
JJJ
h.h.J
60for 1
60for 01
<−+=
≥=
![Page 48: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Torsional Effects
![Page 49: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Torsional EffectsTorsion will be considered when:
Torsional moments are introduced by the eccentricity between the centres of mass and resistance.
Torsional moments are generated due to accidental eccentricities.
Torsional sensitivity is established by computing Bx for each level x when equivalent static forces are acting at ± 0.10 Dnx from the centre of mass.
Bx = δmax / δave
![Page 50: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Torsional Effects
![Page 51: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Torsional EffectsFor buildings with B ≤ 1.7; apply torsional
moments about a vertical axis at each level computed for each of the following two loading cases:
i. Tx = Fx (ex + 0.10 Dnx)
ii. Tx = Fx (ex - 0.10 Dnx)
For buildings with B > 1.7 in cases where IEFaSa(0.2) ≥ 0.35 by Dynamic Analysis
![Page 52: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
1 Vertical stiffness irregularity2 Weight (mass) irregularity3 Vertical geometric irregularity4 In-plane discontinuity5 Out-of-plane offsets6 Discontinuity in capacity (weak storey)7 Torsional sensitivity8 Non-orthogonal systems
Structural Irregularities
![Page 53: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Irregularity trigger
When:
IE·Fa·Sa(0.2) ≥ 0.35
+ any one of the 8 irregularity types,
the special design provisions for irregular structures apply. However, post disaster buildings should never have irregularity type 6 (weak storey)
![Page 54: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Types of Irregularities1. Vertical Stiffness
Lateral stiffness of the SFRS in a storey:< 70% of that in any adjacent storey, or < 80% of the average stiffness of the 3
storeys above or below.
![Page 55: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Types of Irregularities
2. Weight (Mass)
weight of a storey > 150% of weight of an adjacent storey.(a roof lighter than a floor below is excluded)
![Page 56: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Types of Irregularities
3. Vertical Geometric
horizontal dimension of the SFRS in a storey > 130% of that in any adjacent storey.(one-storey penthouse excluded)
![Page 57: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Types of Irregularities4. In-Plane Discontinuity
in-plane offset of an element of the SFRS,orreduction in lateral stiffness of an element in the storey below.
![Page 58: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Types of Irregularities
5. Out-of-Plane Offsetsdiscontinuity of lateral force path
e.g., out-of-plane offsetsof the elements of the SFRS.
Top FloorsBottom Floors
![Page 59: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Types of Irregularities6. Discontinuity in Capacity - Weak Storey
storey shear strength less thanthat in the storey above.(Storey shear strength = total of all elements of the SFRS in the direction considered)
![Page 60: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Types of Irregularities
7. Torsional sensitivity
if the ratio B > 1.7.
B = δmax / δavg
δ calculated for static loads applied at ± 0.10 Dn
Plan
![Page 61: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Types of Irregularities8. Non-orthogonal systems
SFRS not oriented along a set of orthogonal axes.
Plan
![Page 62: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Irregular SFRS
Stiffness of non-structural components
shall not be included to make an irregular
SFRS regular.
![Page 63: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Irregular SFRS
For sites with IE·Fa·Sa(0.2) ≥ 0.35 dynamic analysis is required if h ≥ 20 m, T ≥ 0.5 s or Type 7 (Torsion) irregularity.
For fundamental period equal to or greater than 1.0 s and IEFvSa(1.0) > 0.25, walls forming parts of SFRS shall be continuous from ground to top levels and shall not have irregularity types 4 (in-plane discont.), 5 (out-of-plane offsets)
![Page 64: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Irregular SFRSIrregularity type 6 (weak storey) not permitted except if IEFaSa(0.2) < 0.2 and the design base shear = RdRoV.
Post-disaster buildings shall not have any irregularity of:
types 1 (vert. stiffness), 3 (vert. geom.), 4 (in-plane discont.), 5 (out-of-plane offsets) or 7 (torsion) if IEFaSa(0.2) > 0.35;
type 6 (weak storey).
![Page 65: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
2005 NBCC IEFaSa(0.2)
![Page 66: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
2005 NBCC
![Page 67: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
-400-300-200-100
0100200300400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (sec)
Acce
lera
tion
(cm
/s2 )
m a + c v + k u = m ag
Dynamic Analysis for Dynamic Analysis for Seismic DesignSeismic Design
![Page 68: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
3-Storey Frame Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
Modes of Vibration
![Page 69: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Dynamic Analysis
Linear (Elastic) Dynamic Analysis
Modal Response Spectrum Analysis
Numerical Integration Time History Analysis
Non-linear (Inelastic) Dynamic Analysis
Numerical Integration Time History Analysis
![Page 70: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2Period, T
Spec
tral
Acc
eler
atio
n, S
a(T
)
0 100 200 300
Time, t
If site-specific record is available
Otherwise use site-specific design response spectra (UHS)
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
Spec
tral
acc
eler
atio
n, S
a(T
)
![Page 71: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Modal Spectrum Analysis1. Determine periods (Ti) and mode shapes (φi)
2. Determine the design spectral acceleration value for
each mode S(Ti) from the UHS values specified in
NBCC-2005
3. Compute modal participation factor (γi) for each
mode under consideration
∑=
n
1j
2ji,j
i
φmγ
∑−=
n
1jji,jφm
![Page 72: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Modal Spectrum Analysis
4. Compute elastic modal forces and displacements at each floor level
jiiji,ji, )mS(TγφF = )S(T4πT
γφδ i2
2i
iji,ji, =
5. Find elastic modal storey shears (Vi,x) and base shear (Vi).
∑=
=n
xjji,xi, FV ∑
=
=n
1jji,i FV
![Page 73: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Modal Spectrum Analysis
6. Combine the effects of each mode by usingan appropriate modal combination rule (likeSRSS Method).
∑=
=m
ixix FF
1
2, ∑
=
=m
ixix VV
1
2,
∑=
=m
iie VV
1
2 ∑=
=m
ixix
1
2,δδ
![Page 74: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Modal Spectrum Analysis
7. Determine the design base shear Vd
Edo
ed I
RRVV =
8. If Vd < 0.8 V (by Eq. Static Load) Then Vd = 0.8V, except for irregularstructures requiring dynamic analysis in which case Vd is taken as the larger ofVd and 100% of V
![Page 75: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Example – Modal SuperpositionA 5-storey ductile moment resisting concrete frame is to
be designed for a Vancouver condominium. The soil
condition can be classified as soft rock (Class C) as per
NBCC-2005.
T1 = 1.56 sec; T2 = 0.54 sec; T3 = 0.34 sec
Storey mass; m = 600,000 kg
Total column stiffness; k=120 x 106 N/mm
Rd = 4.0; Ro = 1.7; Ie = 1.0
![Page 76: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Example – Modal Superposition
![Page 77: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
T1=1.56 s T2=0.56 s T3=0.34 sFloor
2 964 1399 270 17201 503 1067 949 1514
γ1=1.25 γ2=0.39 γ3=0.21
S1=0.24g S2=0.59g S3=0.77g
5 1765 -1247 726 2280
4 1623 -386 -518 1747
3 1347 764 -872 1777
6202 1597 555 6428
∑=
=3
1
2,
ixix FF
jiiji,ji, )mS(TγφF =
∑=
5
1jji,F
Example – Modal Superposition
![Page 78: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Ve = 6428 kN
kN945)0.1((4.0)(1.7)
6428IRR
VV Edo
ed ===
Example – Modal Superposition
![Page 79: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Linear Time History AnalysisEmployed when the entire time history of elastic response is required during the ground motion of
interest
Time history analysis should be conducted for an
ensemble of ground motion records that represent
magnitudes, fault distances and source mechanisms
that are consistent with those of the design
earthquakes used to generate design response spectra
![Page 80: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Linear Time History Analysis
Edo
ed I
RRVV =
If Vd < 0.8 V (by Eq. Static Load)
Then Vd = 0.8V, except for irregular
structures requiring dynamic analysis
in which case Vd is taken as the larger of
Vd and 100% of V
![Page 81: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Inelastic Time History AnalysisInvolves the computation of dynamic response at each
time increment with due considerations given to the
inelasticity in members
Nonlinear analysis allows for flexural yielding (or
other inelastic actions) and accounts for subsequent
changes in strength and stiffness. This is done by
incorporating
“Hysteretic Models”
![Page 82: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Inelastic Time History AnalysisWhen non-linear time history analysis is used to justify a
structural design, a special study is required, consisting
of a complete design review by a qualified independent
engineering team. The review is to include ground
motion time histories and the entire design of the
building with emphasis placed on the design of lateral
force resisting system and all the supporting analyses
![Page 83: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Inelastic Time History AnalysisThe results of non-linear time history analysis directly
account for reductions in elastic forces due to inelasticity. The structural overstrength can also be
accounted for directly through appropriate modellingassumptions. The analysis results need not therefore be modified by Rd and Ro. The importance factor IE can be
accounted for either by scaling up the design ground motion histories or by reducing the acceptable
deflection and ductility capacities
![Page 84: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Structural Modelling
![Page 85: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Structural Modelling
![Page 86: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Structural Modelling
![Page 87: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Structural Modelling
![Page 88: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
⎪⎪⎭
⎪⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎪⎩
⎪⎪⎨
⎧
≤
webnexttodistanceclear1/2t12
beams)(cont.lengthSpan1/10beams)(simlelengthSpan1/12
Lo
Member Modelling
![Page 89: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
m
h
L
Member Modelling
![Page 90: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
i jFlexural Springs
Elastic Beam Element with EIand GA
Mi Mj
l 1 l 2
l
Member Modelling
![Page 91: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Hysteretic Behaviour (Steel Structures)
![Page 92: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Hysteretic Models for Steel Elements in Flexure
![Page 93: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
y
cr
n
R/C Member in Flexure
![Page 94: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
n
n
y u
Bilinear Idealization
![Page 95: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Formation of a Plastic Hinge
![Page 96: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
-120 -80 -40 0 40 80 120-400
-200
0
200
400
Mom
ent,
M (
kN.m
)-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Drift (%)
Δ
M = F + P Δ l
Displacement, (mm)
Hysteretic Behaviour (R/C Structures)
![Page 97: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
By Clough (1966) By Takeda (1970)
Stiffness Degrading Models for R/C
![Page 98: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Strength decay
Strength Degradation in R/C
![Page 99: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Stiffness Degradation and Pinching in R/C
![Page 100: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
ssh
y
e f
Anchorage Slip
![Page 101: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Anchorage Slip Model for R/C By Alsiwat & Saatcioglu (1992)
![Page 102: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Effect of Variable Axial Force on R/C
![Page 103: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Axial Force – Flexure Interaction Model By Saatcioglu, Derecho and Corley (1983)
![Page 104: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
In spite of all the complications of hysteretic behaviour of structural elements and sub-
assemblages, it is possible to select reasonably simple hysteretic models for inelastic seismic
analysis of structures….
Hysteretic Modelling
![Page 105: NBCC 05 Professor Saatcioglu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051116/563db996550346aa9a9eb861/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Thank You…
Questions and Comments ?