nature vs. nurture psc 113 jeff schank. outline emergence and causation nature vs. nurture: what is...
TRANSCRIPT
Nature Vs. Nurture
PSC 113Jeff Schank
Outline
• Emergence and Causation• Nature vs. Nurture: What is Nature? What is
Nurture?– The Program/Blueprint Metaphors– Developmental Programs– Causal Loops and Levels of Organization
• Reductionism and Holism
Emergence and Causation
• With our modern notion of Aristotelian causation, we can characterize biological and other complex systems in terms of the first three causes
Flocks of Starlings
Schools of Fish
Herds of Mammals
Nest Thermoregulation in Social Insects
FIG. 10 Apis florea [wild bees] colony (Photo courtesy of Nadine Chapman). Workers that form the protective curtain covering the comb move closer together at low ambient temperatures, and further apart at high ambient temperatures. Julia C. Jones and Benjamin P. Oldroyd (2007)Nest Thermoregulation in Social Insects. ADVANCES IN INSECT PHYSIOLOGY VOL. 33, pp. 153-191)
FIG. 12 An Apis dorsata [giant honey bees] colony. Workers are spread out on the comb to reduce brood nest temperature (Photo by Ben Oldroyd). Julia C. Jones and Benjamin P. Oldroyd (2007 )Nest Thermoregulation in Social Insects.ADVANCES IN INSECT PHYSIOLOGY VOL.33, pp. 153-191)
Nest Thermoregulation in Social Insects
Nature vs. Nurture: What is Nature? What is Nurture?
• A program is “a series of coded instructions which when fed into a computer will automatically direct its operation in carrying out a specific task”. (A blueprint is plan, scheme, or pattern for something, i.e., Aristotle's formal cause.)
Developmental Programs• Although development does not proceed in a way that is analogous to a computer
program, perhaps if we just consider development as a kind of “black box” with the environment providing input, we can use the notion of a program metaphorically
• Closed programs require no specific input (experience) for development to proceed on its genetically predetermined course.
• Open programs, however, require input or experience in order for a developmental program to work.
Closed Open
X
Critical and Sensitive Periods• Critical period: A span or period of time during which specific
environmental input is essential if an ability is to develop– Critical period hypothesis for Language: There is a critical period for
language acquisition that ends with the onset of puberty; if an individual has not received sufficient linguistic input by then, the individual is incapable of acquiring language
• Sensitive period: A span or period of time during which specific environmental input is important for the development of an ability, but at least some aspects of that ability can be learned or acquired without receiving the input during a sensitive period
• Question: is the acquisition of language subject to a critical period, sensitive period, or no period at all?
Distinction between Critical and Sensitive Periods
Critical Sensitive
X X X ?
Testing the Critical Period Hypothesis for Language
• The problem with the critical period hypothesis is that it is not testable in the laboratory
• We cannot take children into a laboratory and raise them with no language input until they reach puberty
• However, there have been cases of people who, out of extreme neglect, mistreatment, or unfortunate circumstances, did not receive language input before puberty
Genie
• Genie existed for 10 years in a closet tied to a potty chair
• She had no discernible linguistic abilities at the time she was found (age 13)
• Video
Problems
• What other developmental effects did isolation have on Genie?
• Was the research adequately conducted?• Did Genie really fail to acquire syntax and
grammar?• Has there been scientific misconduct in the
case of Genie?
Peter E. Jones
• Concludes that these claims are false or misleading– Genie was unable to acquire the morphology of English.– Genie was unable to acquire the syntax of English.– Genie’s utterances remained uninflected and telegraphic– Genie’s utterances remained hierarchically flat.– Genie’s linguistic development leveled off during period 1 (1971-1975).
Causal Loops and Levels of Organization
Ring
dov
e Re
prod
uctiv
e Cy
cle
Reductionism• Definition: Reductionism is the view that explanations of things and/or
their behavior should be in terms of things that are simpler, more obvious, and/or more easily understood than the things themselves
• Historical Background– In the 17th and 18th centuries, the British philosophers Locke, Berkeley, and
Hume, were concerned with how we come to have knowledge of the world and how the mind works
– For all of the them, the mind was essentially a bundle of ideas– Twentieth Century Logical Empiricists: Rudolf Carnap was probably the
leading figure of this movement – The problem concerned the interpretation of the things scientific theories
are about—How can we know a thing in itself?– Answer: Define all scientific terms in terms of statements about observations
using set theory and logic—It turned out not to be possible
Reductionism
• Historical Background continued…– Behaviorism originated from the complete rejection of
anthropomorphism, anecdotalism, and introspectionism at the turn of the century as typified in the behaviorism of J. B. Watson and B. F. Skinner
– Behaviorists start from the proposition the behavior of organisms can be studied as natural events and they sought to discover laws of association among behavior and stimuli resulting from learning
– Problems: Oversimplified the environment, ignored what happens inside the organism, and ignored social learning and context
Reductionism: Nature vs. Nurture• Especially in the 20th century to today, many researchers have assumed
that the behavior of organisms can be explained by some proportion of nature (genes) or nurture (environment, experience).
• What proportion of IQ is determined by genes (nature) and what proportion by experience (nurture)?
• This question makes it sound as though we can always answer such• questions by giving some percentage such as 60% of IQ is determined by
the genes and 40% is determined by experience• Research in animal behavior has revealed the relationship between genes,• Experience and development are far from this simple (e.g., consider the
ring dove reproductive cycle)• Thus, the nature vs. nurture distinction is reductionistic in that it ignores
causal loops up and down levels of organization