natural catastrophe risk management policy in...
TRANSCRIPT
Natural Catastrophe Risk Management Policy in Japan: Roles of government to promote public private partnerships
Hirokazu TatanoDisaster Prevention Research Institute,
Kyoto University
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Three ways of Government to encourage private insurance system
1. Reduce vulnerability of exposure by implementing risk control measures
Flood and Storm Insurance in Japan100% private insurance covers 30-70% for storm losses and 10-20% for flood.
Well Prepared Flood Protection InfrastructureIncentives for mitigation in Japanese Earthquake Insurance Discounting premiums based on the investigation of anti-seismic capacity of the buildingInspection system, performance certificate
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
2. Reduce the high layer risk by holding it.E.g. French NatCat Insurance and Japanese earthquake insurance
3. Built up trust by appropriate incentive systemsNot only moral hazard in insurance industries but also in design and construction sectors.Auditing system for buildings’ design and construction
Too mach intervention may become disincentives for private insurance industrye.g. , Japanese earthquake insurance: Property and causality insurance supported and strongly regulated by the Government insured 1-14% of losses in building where a mutual insurance insured 2-25% in the past.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
ContentsNatural Disaster in Japan Disaster Risk Management and Insurance
Weather Related Disasters and Strom & Flood insuranceEarthquake Disaster and Earthquake Insurance
Discussion & Conclusion
Natural Disasters in Japan
A Natural disaster-prone country
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Japan, 95,21%
Other, 359,79%
Japan, 96,11%
Other, 743,89%
JAPAN: A Disaster-Prone Country
Number of earthquakes with magnitude of 6.0 or larger
•
Japan covers only 0.25% of the land area on the grove, the number of earthquakes and distribution of active volcanoes is quite high.
•
20% of earthquakes with magnitude of 6.0 or larger were occurred in Japan.
•
10% of active volcanoes is located in Japan.
Number of active volcanoes
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
The Number of Deaths and Missing in Natural Disasters in JapanTonankai
quakeHanshin-Awaji
earthquakeFukui quake Typhoon
Ise-wan
Weather Related Disasters
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Natural Hazard →DisasterConsequences ofHuman Behavior
Hazard: Flood, Earthquakes,,etc
Population & AssetExposure:population and asset
exposed to the threat of natural hazards
Vulnerability: degree of resistance of the asset & population against disaster
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Proactive CounterProactive Counter MeasuresMeasures ofof DisasterDisaster Risk ManagementRisk Management
R isk C ontro lR isk C ontro l
R isk F inanceR isk F inance
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
M itiga tionsB uilding codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
M itiga tionsB uild ing codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk A cceptanceB uilding R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
R isk A cceptanceB uild ing R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prevent/reduce (direct) losses
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prepare funds for recovery process
R isk F inanceR isk F inance
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
M itiga tionsB uilding codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
M itiga tionsB uild ing codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk A cceptanceB uilding R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
R isk A cceptanceB uild ing R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prevent/reduce (direct) losses
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prepare funds for recovery process
R isk C ontro lR isk C ontro l
R isk F inanceR isk F inance
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
M itiga tionsB uilding codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
M itiga tionsB uild ing codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk A cceptanceB uilding R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
R isk A cceptanceB uild ing R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prevent/reduce (direct) losses
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prepare funds for recovery process
R isk C ontro lR isk C ontro l
R isk F inanceR isk F inance
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
M itiga tionsB uilding codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
M itiga tionsB uild ing codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk A cceptanceB uilding R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
R isk A cceptanceB uild ing R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prevent/reduce (direct) losses
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prepare funds for recovery process
R isk F inanceR isk F inance
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
R isk A vo idance/P revention
L and use R egulation
M itiga tionsB uilding codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
M itiga tionsB uild ing codeH igh-T ech. Instrum ents:
(A ctuator, dum per, etc)
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk T ransferInsuranceA R T , C at-B ond
R isk A cceptanceB uilding R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
R isk A cceptanceB uild ing R isk R eserveSelf-Insurance, C aptiveF inite, etc
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prevent/reduce (direct) losses
A ctions taken before catastrophic events as to prepare funds for recovery process
Benefit of Mitigation can be different. It depends on the possibility of risk transfer [ Kobayashi & Yokomastu 2000].
Combination of Risk control and financing measure is important!
Needs for integration
Disaster Risk Management Policies and Insurance
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Large scale flood disasters frequently happened from 1930s to 1950s.
YearYear--Mon.Mon. CauseCause DeathDeath MissingMissing CausalityCausality
1934.91934.9 MurotoMuroto TyphoonTyphoon
27022702 334334 1499414994
1945.91945.9 MakurazakiMakurazaki TyphoonTyphoon
24732473 12831283 24522452
1947.91947.9 Catharine Catharine TyphoonTyphoon
10771077 853853 15471547
1954.91954.9 ToyamaruToyamaru TyphoonTyphoon
13611361 400400 16011601
1959.91959.9 IsewanIsewan TyphoonTyphoon 46974697 401401 3892138921
http://www.ffortune.net/social/seso/nihon-mei/muroto-taihu.htm
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
High Tide Disaster by Isewan Typhoon in 1959
http://www12.freeweb.ne.jp/photo/ajapskwn/saigai/p02.htmlhttp://www12.freeweb.ne.jp/photo/ajapskwn/saigai/p02.html
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Disaster Management Policy
In 1961, the Disaster Countermeasure Basic Act was legislated.
Change in the policy
from reactive to proactive approach.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Change in Disaster Management Related Budget5-10% of National Gov.’s Total Budget is spend for Disaster Management
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Features of Flood Risk Management in Japan
Intensive investment for structural counter measuresof flood controlComprehensive flood protection plan including structural and nonstructural flood protectionWidely disseminated comprehensive property insurance which is run by private insurancecompany Weak public involvement and conflicts which highlights tradeoffs between environment and flood protectionWeak link to land-use policies
Complementarily between flood risk control and financing measures.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
reservoir
leveediversion
Storage Storage enlargement enlargement and diversionand diversion
dredge
Flood Control Flood Control ((StructuralStructural) Measures) Measures
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Land use planning(?) and Flood Protection in Tokyo
1882
1919
1954
1996
37years past
35years past
42years past
1911 1930
Construction of Edo-Gawa discharge channel
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Retention ponds and infiltration
Flood-proofing
Conservation of upper-stream basin
Flood insuranceForecasting and early warning
Flood fightingLand use control/management*
* Not working well in Japan
H
Radar
Flood Hazard Mapping
Non-structural flood control counter measures
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Result of Flood ManagementExtensive effort of governments’ flood management brought about continuous decrease in inundated area and total economic loss associated with weather related disasterstaying in the same level as in the past despite of the increase of the exposure caused by rapid urbanization.
Insurability of weather related event!
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Flood Risk FinancingFire Insurance covers wind, hail and snow triggered disasters like storms and avalanches.Comprehensive property insurance covers not only wind, hail and snow triggered disasters but also water related disaster like floods.These insurances provided by private insurance companies.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100Loss ratio(%)
Payout(%)
●
Storm
0
25
50
75
100
0 25 50 75 100Loss Ratio(%)
Payout(%)
●
Flood
Comprehensive property insurance
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Total and insured losses of major weather-related disasters in the past
No Event Year
Total Loss*0(US Million $)
Insured Loss*1(US Million $)
P&CInsurance*2(US Million $)
JA Mutual*3(US Million$)
Coverage(%)
1 Typhoon MIREILLE(No.19) 1991 10000 5,389 4,270 1,119 53.9%2 Typhoon SONGDA(No.18) 2004 6000 4,607 3,604 1,004 76.8%3 Typhoon Bart(No.18) 1999 5000 3,394 2,822 571 67.9%4 Typhoon TOKAGE(No.23) 2004 7500 1,658 1,284 374 22.1%5 Typhoon CHABA(No.16) 2004 6000 1,325 1,126 199 22.1%6 Flood Tokai 2000 7440 1,040 932 108 14.0%7 Flood Niigata/Fukushima/Fukui 2004 1950 293 223 70 15.0%
*0
*1
*2
*3
Insured losses are the sum of total payout ajusted by the exchage rate at the time preriod from the members ofthe General Insurance Association (P&C Insurance) and National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural
Total losses are from EM-DATEM-DAT: The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database www.em-dat.net -Université Catholique de Louvain - Brussels - Belgium
data from Data Pack from 2001 to 2005 by National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives (JAMutual), http://www.ja-kyosai.or.jp/about_ren/annual/index.html
data from Fact Book 2006 by the General Insurance Association Japan, http://www.sonpo.or.jp/e/index.html
Earthquake Risk Management Policies
Focusing on earthquake risk financing
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Distribution of the Epicenters of Earthquakes Causing Damage (from 1885)
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Establishment of the earthquake insurance system
Jun. 1964 Niigata earthquakeThe Minister of Finance asked the Insurance Council to develop specific policies for earthquake insurance
Apr. 1965 Report of the Insurance CouncilDecide the outline of insurance, coverage, reinsurance method, underwriting method, etc.
Jun. 1966 Act for Earthquake Insurance
The system was carried out
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Earthquake Insurance in JapanEarthquake Insurance on Dwelling Risks will pay claims for losses of buildings or contents caused by fire,destruction, burying or washing-away following earthquake, volcanic eruption, or tsunami following earthquake or volcanic eruption. The insured amount of Earthquake Insurance on Dwelling Risks is set between 30% and 50% of the insured amount of fire insurance, and the upper limits are 50 million yen for dwelling houses and 10 million yen for household goods.The national government is managing the system.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Organizational Scheme of the Japanese Earthquake Insurance
Incurred Insurer Re-Insurer(Japan Earthquake Re.)
JEI Pool
National Government
Special Purposeaccount
General
account
premium Reinsurance (Total volume)
retrocession
retrocession
payout
payout
payoutpayout
Insurance co. 404.2JE Re 355.8
Government 952.8Total 1,715.9
JEI Pool (2004.3)
(Bil. Yen)
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
The present reinsurance scheme
0¥ 75 billion
$ 0.6 billion¥ 13118 billion
$ 11 billion¥ 5,000 billion
$ 41 billion
Loss of a single earthquake
50 %
5 %Liability of private insurance
companies (include JE Re.)
Liability of the government
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Revisions in 2001Introduction of discount system
Discount for time of construction (10%)Considering investigations of damage 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake
Discount for earthquake resistance grade (10% -30%)
The dwelling performance indication system developed by the government have put into operation
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
The present systemPremium rate
Discount systemDiscount for time of construction (10%)Discount for earthquake resistance grade (10-30%)
structure
location
Non- wooden structures
Wooden structures
1st ¥ 0.50 ¥ 1.20
2nd ¥ 0.70 ¥ 1.65
3rd ¥ 1.35 ¥ 2.35
4th ¥ 1.75 ¥ 3.55
Per year and ¥1,000 of insurance coverage
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Future of the earthquake Insurance system
ProblemsRegional divisions of premium rate
The proportion insured (30 – 50%)
Low penetration rates of the earthquake insurance
The number of Earthquake policies per the number of Fire policies are 37.4% ( 9.3million policies)( 2004)
Etc...
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Developments in Ownership of Earthquake Insurance on Dwelling Risks Policies
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Other earthquake risk financing toolsMutual Insurance
e.g., JA Mutual Insurance (13million Policies)Payout after the great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake (billion Yen)
ARTCat-Bond (parametric bond)Contingent Dept FacilityEtc.
No Event Year
Estimated Housing Loss *0
(US Million $)
Insured Loss*1
(US Million $)
P&C Insurance
*2
(US Million $)
JA Mutual*3
(US Million $)
Coverage
(%)
1The Great Hanshin-Awaji quake
1995 61,141 2,045 812 1,233 3.3%
2 Geiyo
quake 2001 697 258 135 122 37.0%
3 Niigata Chuuetsu
quake 2004 2,815 843 130 713 29.9%
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Trust company (fund management)
Company(Oriental Land )
SPC* Investorfinancial transaction
commission (3.1% / year)
bond issuing
commission+ interest (market rate)
$100 million interest (market rate)
*Special Purpose Company
$100 million
Trust company
Company(Oriental Land )
SPC* Investorpayment of capital
$0~$100 million
payment of the balance after principal reduction
principal payment
Ordinary days
Earthquake
Cat-Bond for private firms
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Parametric Cat-Bond
Inner Grid Outer Grid
7.1 7.3 7.5 7.7
20.00
32.00
44.00
56.00
68.00
80.00 80.00
65.00
50.00
20.00
35.00
JMA Magnitude
US Dollar Losson Original NotionalAmount in Millions
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Contingent Debt Facility
fund managementwith safe assets
Company(Tomoegawa Paper) SPC* Lender**
loan reservation contract
commission
syndicate loan
interest
$4 billion asset management yield
Ordinary days
Earthquake
**Sizuoka Bank,Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance, etc.
guarantee commission Development Bank of Japan
debt guarantee
debt guarantee
loan draw down$0~$4 billion
interest interest
guarantee commission
Development Bank of Japan
Company(Tomoegawa Paper) SPC* Lender**
Gov. Bank
Gov. Bank
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
IssuesHouseholds
Low penetration ratio of earthquake insurance in household
Limited coverage (30-50%)
Partial link between premium and seismic vulnerability (incentives for mitigation)
FirmsFew firms have earthquake insurance policies
GeneralBuilt up a bridge between insurance and mitigation
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Niigata Chuetsu EQ (Oct.23,2004)Niigata Chuetsu6.8 M (JMM, Largest )10km depth?Unknown fault?
5KmKawaguchi Town
Ojiya
Yamakoshi
Landslide
Damage of Road
Due to successive aftershocks and road network Damages, recovery speed ofInfrastructures were slow
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Very few firms have earthquake insurance policies.
Example: Niigata Sanyo Electronics co. suffers economic losses in their property in 50 billion yen (400 million US$ ). But, even such a big company had no earthquake risk financing counter measures.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Way forward to building up the bridge for firms
Business Continuity Plan will be required for large scale companies and recommended for middle and small scale companies.Encourage good firms through market
Investors and Public relations (IR and PR)
Mitigation and Risk Financing?
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
Three ways of the Government to encourage private insurance system
1. Reduce vulnerability of exposure by implementing risk control measures
Flood and Storm Insurance in Japan100% private insurance covers 30-70% for storm losses and 10-20% for flood.Well Prepared Flood Protection InfrastructureIncentives for mitigation in Japanese Earthquake Insurance Discounting premiums based on the investigation of anti-seismic capacity of the buildingInspection system, performance certificate
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University
Hirokazu Tatano
2. Reduce the high layer risk by holding it.E.g. French NatCat Insurance and Japanese earthquake insurance
3. Built up trust by appropriate incentive systemsNot only moral hazard in insurance industries but also in design and construction sectors.Auditing system for buildings’ design and constructionToo mach intervention may become disincentives for private insurance industrye.g. , Japanese earthquake insurance: Property and causality insurance supported and strongly regulated by the Government insured 1-14% of losses in building where a mutual insurance insured 2-25% in the past.