national human rights institutions in macedonia: normative models and challenges
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
1/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
2/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
3/84
IMPRESSUM
AUTHOR
Bijlana Kotevska
CONSULTING TEAM
Kumjana Novakova, Dimitar Nikolovski
REVIEWERS
Uranija Pirovska, Prof. Richard Carver
PUBLISHER
Centre for Regional Policy Research and Cooperation Studiorum,
Skopje
FOR THE PUBLISHER
Prof. Tome Gruevski, President
DESIGN
Dragan Hristov
PRINTED BY
Grafostil, Skopje
Skopje, December 2012
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
4/84
NATIONALHUMAN RIGHTS
INSTITUTIONS
IN MACEDONIA :NORMATIVE MODE
AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
5/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
6/84
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS 7
I. INTRODUCTION 9
II. GENERAL NOTE ON NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS
III. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN INTERNATIONA
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
A. Universal Level - United Nations 17
B. European Regional Level 24
1. Council of Europe 24
2. European Union 27
VI. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIAA. Ombudsperson of the Republic of Macedonia
1. Formal Establishment of the Ombudsperson
2. Functions, Competences and Responsibilities of the
Ombudsperson
3. Members of the Ombudsperson
4. Operating Principles of the Ombudsperson
5. Resources of the Ombudsperson
6. Recommendations
B. Commission for Protection against Discrimination
1. Formal Establishment of the Commission for Protectio
against Discrimination2. Functions, Competences and Responsibilities of the
Commission for Protection against Discrimination
3. Members of the Commission for Protection against
Discrimination
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
7/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
8/84
ABBREVIATIONS
Anti-discrimination Law Law on Prevention and Protection a
CAT Convention against Torture and Ot
Degrading Treatment or Punishme
CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of AlDiscrimination against Women
CMCoE Committee of Ministers of the Coun
CoE Council of Europe
CPAD Commission for Protection Against
CRC Convention on the Rights of the Chi
CRPD Convention on the Rights of Person
CSOs Civil Society Organisations
ECRI European Commission against Rac
EU European Union
HRC Human Rights Council of the United
ICC International Coordinating CommiInstitutions for the Promotion and P
Rights
MLSP Ministry of Labour and Social Policy
Macedonia
NHRIs National Human Rights Institutions
NPM National Preventive Mechanism fo
OPCAT Optional Protocol to the Convention
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Punishment
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
9/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
10/84
I. INTRODUCTION
The idea of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) goes han
of building or strengthening of democratic institutions.1 Alth
United Nations (UN) already in the first years of its existence
reached only in the 1990s. Thus, organisations on universal a
level have been working on promoting NHRIs ever since. Althlegally binding document on either level, certain standards ha
been used by states as guidance in the building of their own NHR
In Macedonia, following the independence, the idea of a NHRI
society organisations (CSOs).2 The discussions on what model w
of the country were terminated with the establishment of theRepublic of Macedonia (the Ombudsperson) in 1997. These we
the consultation process on the first comprehensive anti-discrim
2010 Law on Prevention and Protection against Discriminatio
Law), which established the Commission for Protection against
However, the two institutions were established not as a result of
under the pressure of the international community.3
No body from Macedonia has been accredited with an A stat
Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promo
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
11/84
investigate the acts committed by police officers.4 That same year,
Committee pointed out that while the Ombudsperson should be streng
try should introduce a NHRI with a wider mandate.5 Similar concerns w
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the situation
defenders in the country.6 Furthermore, the conclusions and recom
2009 Universal Periodic Review on Macedonia note that the countr
taking appropriate measures to ensure that the Ombudsperson is in c
Paris Principles or envisaging the establishment of a NHRI in co
Principles and accredited by the ICC.7 The Committee on the Rights of
from 2010 are along the similar lines.8 Following a visit to Mace
Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Thomas Ham
mended that the country should generally review the role and
Ombudsperson, and particularly in the area of non-discrimination a
duct, and should take necessary action to guarantee that the institu
resources to fulfil its mission adequately.9 In 2010, the European Co
Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) signalled that the Ombudsperson did n
of an independent specialised body to combat racism and discrimin
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
4 United Nations Committee Against Torture. Consideration of reports submitted by S
cle 19 of the Convention: Concluding observations - The former Yugoslav Republi
2008. United Nations Website. . Last accessed: 20 November 2012. para.7
5 United Nations Human Rights Committee. Consideration of reports submitted by Scle 40 of the Covenant: Concluding observations - The former Yugoslav Republic of M
United Nations Website. . Last accessed: 20 November 2012. para.7
6 United Nations Human Rights Council. Report of the Special Representative of the S
situation of human rights defenders, Hina Jilani: Addendum Mission to The form
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
12/84
level, and consequently such a body is necessary.10 Equally relev
the non-compliance with the core requirements contained in th
for membership in the European Union (EU). The membership
demand stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the ru
and respect for and protection of minorities.11 The European C
subsequent reports, including the last 2012 progress report,12 n
al framework on Human Rights and the protection of minorities i
Taking the above in consideration, the Centre for Regiona
Cooperation Studiorum considered that it was of outmost im
debate on the reforms of the Human Rights related institutional f
assessment of the national Human Rights institutional framewo
tional standards, and the subsequent provision of recommendat
at the Ombudsperson and the CPAD. It focuses on the relevant l
for the NHRIs in Macedonia and gives conclusions and recomme
the current framework in line with the relevant international s
obligations of Macedonia under international Human Rights la
recommendations, a comparative analysis of five NHRIs and an a
effectiveness of resources allocated to the NHRIs in Macedonia, w
annexed to this study. Hopefully, the study will serve as a ground
institutional framework reforms in line with the NHRI internation
The study is structured in three parts. The brief general introd
beginning has no intentions to provide a full and comprehensive
re NHRIs or the on-going debates, but to introduce the subject o
part of the study lays out both universal and European NHRI in
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
13/84
The third part gives an overview of the institutional setup of the count
assessment of the compliance of the Ombudsperson and the CPAD wi
al standards. Last but not least are the conclusions and recommen
nomic analysis and the matrix of the summary findings of the five N
study are annexed as well.
The study has been built upon international and domestic laws, docum
the institutions under consideration, and IGOs and CSOs reports.domestic policy documents were also considered (see the Recomm
for recommendations on Human Rights public policies in Macedonia).
were used insofar as they assisted clarifying NHRI standards. Mate
online and/or in print, but prepared as part of earlier efforts of CSOs t
NHRIs in Macedonia, and shared with the research team working on th
included. Cut-off date for this study was 01 March 2012. All relevant
lowing this date are included in footnotes. Highly relevant informatio
included in the text, with a note that this is a development after the cut
was gathered through desk research, and analysed through text ana
Aside from the sources included in the bibliography list, the text of tgreatly from the discussions on its first draft by an expert group in Sep
the discussions of panellists and participants at an international c
Skopje in October 2012, where the initial findings of the study we
author and the consulting team are grateful to everyone who helped
the study through comments, suggestions, or written materials. S
extended to the two reviewers of the study, Prof. Richard Carver and
for their insightful and extremely valuable comments.
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
14/84
II. GENERAL NOTE ON NATIONHUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIO
NHRIs are defined as bodies established by a Government unde
law or decree, the functions of which are specifically defined in
and protection of human rights.14 The protection of Human R
depends on the existence of effective and accessible state inst
Human Rights violations, including NHRIs.15
As noted in the begprocess of democratic institution-building is closely tied to the b
This is especially important within the context of transition, a
Human Rights culture.16
Overall, NHRIs are a rather new phenomenon in international r
first relevant resolutions were adopted in 1946 by the Economic aing upon states to consider the establishment of information g
Rights committees to assist the communication and cooperation w
Human Rights18 (on international law and NHRIs see Chapter III)
what later became NHRIs was the creation of entities at nationa
tribute to the adherence to United Nations standards and strengt
between the UN and its member states. The commemorative con
of the 30th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human R
the efforts of the UN to promote the idea of NHRIs through a semin
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
15/84
The final outcome of it were a set of guidelines on NHRIs, listing a n
tences which could be vested to, as well as (almost all) the criteria wh
ther elaborated in the Paris Principles19 (for the Paris Principles, and l
re NHRIs within the frame of the UN, and the regional systems, please
However, this early initiative by the UN was followed by only few sta
the end of the Cold War that the climate and political will for e
changed. There are authors that analyse the NHRIs expansion in tCardenas argues that highly diverse governments around the world
ilar NHRIs largely for international reasons: international norms pro
national institution building, concrete forms of international assist
process, and more diffuse international pressures [] make nom
improvements highly desirable.21 Further in her argument, Carden
international origins of these national institutions leave an unin
looked legacy [] The ensuing institutional dynamics are far mo
either unbridled optimism or cynical scepticism would suggest.22
The past two decades NHRIs have been flourishing, with many diffe
oped, making it close to impossible, or at least difficult, to attempt to cof NHRIs that will be complete or that can do justice to the diversity. M
gy can be done with regards to membership, mandate, political tradi
typology with an emphasis on the main functions can be, however
overview of the NHRIs variety, although it will inevitably involve a cau
tion. For the purposes of this study few possible types of typologies ca
- Single-member institutions and multiple-member institutions
- Institutions with a primary task to advise the governments and
ing individual complaints;
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
16/84
- Institutions working on Human rights and those working
example, discrimination); etc.24
According to some, there are two main types of NHRIs, ombud
sions.25 The International Council on Human Rights Policy cluster
son, national Human Rights commission, national advisory c
Rights, national anti-discrimination commission, and defensor d
Ombudsperson is the oldest type of an institution, originating ininstitution used to have its main focus on the conduct of the p
Usually, it is a single-headed institution with a very specifically
as maladministration, discrimination, childrens rights, etc,29
complaints. They can sometimes have a specifically defined m
interrelated institutions, for example in the areas of discriminand data protection.30
Human Rights commissions key mandate is usually on invest
also provide education and review of potential legislation,32
II. GENERAL NOTE ON N
24 International Council on Human Rights Policy.Assessing the effectivenes
Institutions. ICHRP Website.
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
17/84
include protection and promotion.33 These are usually composed of
with a specific Human Rights expertise.34 Many of the commission
equality and non-discrimination, and function as equality bodies.35
Human Rights institutes or centres are another type of an institut
broad membership bringing together diverse representatives of the
general policy framework within which these operate.36 This type o
not deal with individual complaints, but focus on human rights resea
The structure and the number of NHRIs are very dependent on the c
result of multiple factors, such as political, historical, cultura
Moreover, it is recommendable NHRIs to be developed by taking into
political and institutional traditions of the country.39 Organisation
whether an institution has only one or several offices on the territor
dependent on the needs of the country, though local offices generally
bility and so it is recommendable to establish ones if possible. Howe
basic pre-conditions for the functioning of any NHRI, as further elab
Principles, including: formal establishment through the Constitution o
act, pluralism in the composition, suitable infrastructure and stab
NHRIs members40
(please see Chapter III for detailed elaboration of tand other relevant international standards).
These are a few brief, general notes which by no means aim to be
general discussions on NHRIs. Their purpose is to point out the multip
country has when it comes to choosing a model of NHRI.
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
33 Reif, Linda C. Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of National Human Rig
Governance and Human Rights Protection. 13 Harvard Human Rights Journal 1, 200
34 Ibid. p.10
35 U it d N ti Offi f th U it d N ti Hi h C i i f H Ri ht
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
18/84
III. NATIONAL HUMANRIGHTS INSTITUTIONS ININTERNATIONAL HUMAN RI
NHRIs are not regulated in great detail in Human Rights law
regional level. However, certain recommended standards and g
section gives an overview of the standards prescribed at univ
frame of the UN, and at the European regional level, within the C
and the EU. All these standards stand as relevant in the case of M
ber of the UN and the CoE, and an EU candidate country.
A. UniversalLevel- UnitedNationsRight after the UN was established, discussions on the idea of NH
standards for the latter started. As noted above, the first rele
adopted already in 1946 by the Economic and Social Council
consider the establishment of information groups or local Huma
assist the communication and cooperation with the Commissi
Since then, different types of documents have been adopted
level, containing standards and clarifications related to the esand positioning) and functioning (mandate and accountability)
- standards contained in hard law: Convention on the Disability (Art 33) Optional Protocol of the Convention ag
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
19/84
- authoritative interpretations assisting the reading ofComment No.2 of the Committee of the Rights of the Child,
No.10 of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultura
Recommendation XVII of the Committee on Elimination of Rac
and CEDAW Statement on the Elimination of Discrimination aga
relationship with national human rights institutions.
Out of these, only the standards contained in hard law are legally bin
that have ratified the instruments.42 Both the CRPD and the OPCAT f
lishment of new, or the designation of an existing national mechanis
competences tied to the implementation of the two conventions, in th
States Parties should take into account the Paris Principles, as dire
both.43 Thus, it can be argued that the Paris Principles, although so
read into these two documents, and have thus acquired legal force.
The Paris Principles, compiled at an International Workshop on Natio
the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights held in Paris in 1991
elaborate set of standards on NHRIs at the UN level up to this date.44
with the 1992 Resolution by the UN Commission on Human Rights
1993 General Assembly Resolution 48/134 on National institutions
and protection of human rights,45 they contain four sections of sta
tences and responsibilities, composition and guarantees of indepen
ism, methods of operation, and other principles arising from the poss
status of these institutions.
According to the Paris Principles, a NHRI should be vested with the co
mote and protect Human Rights,46 and should have as broad man
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
20/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
21/84
The composition of a NHRI and the appointment of its members shou
ist representation of all social groups involved in the protection
Human Rights, especially of the CSOs, trends in philosophical and
universities and other qualified experts, and the parliament.54 Repr
government can participate in the deliberations, but only in an adviso
representatives in the governing bodies of the institutions and witho
ing/voting capacity.56According to the ICC general observations, du
tion process a NHRI needs to demonstrate the maintenance of a cons
with the civil society.57
The procedure for appointment, under the Paris Principles, should
official act establishing the duration of the mandate, and regulating
a renewal, provided that the pluralism criterion is satisfied.58 Infrast
ing should be sufficient59 in the sense that these enable the NHRI to
and premises, guaranteeing independence from the Government,
as well as in its financial working.60 Such a NHRI should be able to: fr
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
54 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Principles re
National Institutions (The Paris Principles). Office of the United Nations High Co
Rights Website. . Last
2012. Composition and guarantees of independence and pluralism, para.1 (a-d)
55 Ibid. Composition and guarantees of independence and pluralism, para.1 (e)
56 General Observations of the ICC, Sub-Committee on Accreditation (2009). 2.3
57 Ibid. 2.1
58 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Principles re
National Institutions (The Paris Principles). Office of the United Nations High Co
Rights Website. . Last
2012. Composition and guarantees of independence and pluralism, para.3
59 Meaning of sufficient is clarified further in the ICC general observations as: the
d d i l i h d ffi l i d b fi d d
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
22/84
question within its competence, including the access to any i
address public opinion, meet on regular basis, establish worki
ted, maintain consultations with other bodies, cooperate w
Individuals, as well as associations and trade unions or other r
sations may have access to the NHRI and may be able to bring
case, the NHRI should be able to pursue amicable settlement
their rights and possible remedies.62 The NHRI should also be
mendations to the authorities about amendments and reform
and administrative practices especially if such recommendatio
which have been brought in front of it.63
The ICC was established to manage the coordination and activiti
national level, but also to serve as an evaluating body for the pro
the individual NHRIs on national level.64 It mandated th
Accreditation (SCA) to carry out the accreditation process.65 SCA
accreditation applications consisting of an application to th
detailed statement of compliance with the Paris Principles and
to the ICC Secretariat at the OHCHR (National Institutions U
awards one of the three statuses to a national institution. The acc
accreditation full compliance with each of the Paris Principles
B - not fully in compliance or insufficient information and a no
C - non-compliance, not a member of the ICC or observer on
may be un-accredited, as they may not have applied for accred
III. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS I
61 Ibid. Methods of Operation, para.1(a-g)
62 Ibid. Additional Principles, para.1(a-c)
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
23/84
accreditation, as each NHRI is re-assessed by the ICC every five yea
NHRIs or similar bodies may choose not to take part in ICC activities.
The Paris Principles were also referred to in the Vienna Declaration a
Action, by reaffirming the important and constructive role played by
nizing the right of each State to choose the framework which is best
ular needs at the national level.68 It calls upon governments to
resources for building a NHRI.69 Furthermore, it also calls upon the
support the efforts of the countries willing to establish or further dev
including education and training through its technical assistance pro
Other documents serving as authoritative interpretations can assist
law. These include the general comments and recommendations as w
issued by Human Rights monitoring bodies. Relevant for the presenCRC General Comment No.2, CESCR General Comment No.1
Recommendation XVII and the CEDAW Statement from its 40 Session
against women and NHRI.
The CRC General Comment No.2 on the role of independent NHRIs in
protection of the rights of the child has the aim to encourage States Pnew or review existing institutions in order to facilitate the imple
Convention on the Rights of the Child. Such an institution should a
under the convention, and should be able to independently and e
promote and protect childrens rights, including mainstreaming child
work of all mentioned institutions.72
While prescribing in greater detapowers, and establishing the process, resources, pluralistic represe
bility and participation, relations and positioning of the institution vis-
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
24/84
CSOs - these standards are mostly a repetition of the Paris Princi
tion to this, it also states that a NHRI must have the power to co
plaints and petitions and carry out investigations, including those
or directly by children73 and includes a section on providing re
childrens rights, as well as formulates the recommended activit
CERD General Recommendation XVII and the CEDAW Statemen
discrimination against women and NHRI directly call upon stat
Principles when establishing a NHRI. The CESCR General Comm
by the proliferation of [. . .] [NHRI, a trend that] has been stron
General Assembly and the Commission on Human Rights.75
comment in order to call upon countries to include economic, so
(ESCR) as part of the NHRI mandate. Thus, it will further assist the
visibility and interdependence of rights76 and lists a number of ac
NHRIs can be tasked, in the context of ESCR.77
Richard Carver raises an important point in relation to the view
ies have on the role of NHRIs when it comes to the reports whic
He notes the diametrical opposite positions of the CERD on one
the CESCR, on the other. Carver highlights the fact that CERD co
able for NHRIs to be included in the reporting to the treaty bodi
opposite from the CRC, according to which it is not appropriate
ed in these processes, or to the CESCR which makes no mention
to this type of reporting. He explains such opposite positions wi
Principles do not offer a specific guidance on this issue.78
III. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS I
73 Ibid
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
25/84
In sum, the standards on NHRIs at UN level, as described above, are c
Paris Principles. Although not legally binding, they provide the core fr
been referred to as a body of standards in legally binding instrume
hard law. They have already been adopted with a GA resolution, w
soft law. All this, together with the authoritative interpretations of law
international law NHRI standards at UN level.
B. EuropeanRegionalLevelStandards on NHRI exist on the European regional level, both withi
Council of Europe and the European Union. As Macedonia is a mem
and a candidate country for the latter, it needs to align its domestic in
work with the requirements set for NHRIs by both the CoE and the EUan overview of the existing standards at European level.
1. CouncilofEurope
Within the framework of the CoE, standards related to NHRIs are setmendations of the Committee of Ministers (CMCoE) and by the ECRI g
ommendations. Both are addressed to the CoE member states and
binding. However, both can be indirectly enforced, as the recomm
CMCoE are on matters for which the Committee has agreed a comm
may request the governments of members to inform it of the action t
regard to such recommendations.80 ECRI can also recommend th
monitoring work that member states align domestic legislation, poli
including recommendations on the member states institutional fr
l li d ti 81
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
26/84
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
27/84
ies focusing on racial equality or ethnic discrimination, as stated in t
tion, as they can also be bodies with wider objectives in the field of H
erally.87 They should be politically independent, but still have acce
ments,88 and should strive to maximise the quality of their research a
in order to build and enhance their credibility with the national autho
wider public.89 The composition of the NHRIs should reflect the divers
They should be easily accessible, and have local offices, where a
should be in a position to exercise their mandate without interferenc
Such a body would have the following functions and responsibilities:
- work towards the elimination of the various forms of discrim
equality of opportunity and good relations between persons b
ferent groups in society;- monitor the content and effect of legislation and executive a
their relevance to the aim of combating racism, xenophobia, a
intolerance;
- make proposals for possible modifications to such legislation,
- advise the legislative and executive authorities on improvinpractice in the relevant fields;
- provide aid and assistance to victims, including legal aid;
- have recourse to the courts or other judicial authorities as app
necessary;
- hear and consider complaints and petitions and, in relation to
priate powers to obtain evidence and information;
- seek settlements either through amicable conciliation or, wit
ib d b h l h h bi di d f bl d i i
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
28/84
- provide information and advice to relevant state and ot
tions on standards of anti-discriminatory practice;
- promote and contribute to the training of certain key grou
the primary training role of the professional organisation
- raise awareness on issues of discrimination;
- produce and publish pertinent information and documen
- support and encourage organisations with similar objecticialised body; and
- take account of and reflect as appropriate the concerns o
ECRI Recommendation No.7 repeats some of the standards
Recommendation No.2, adding that national legislation should
legal standing of organisations, trade unions and other concernadministrative and criminal cases. The law should guarant
lawyer if needed, as well as an interpreter. Persons seeking pro
institutions, including persons which assist the reporting and the
need to be protected under domestic legislation. Alleged act
border control officials, members of army or prison personneplaced under the competence of the NHRI.95
As the above-outlined standards show, the ECRI Recommend
and most detailed instrument on NHRI within the CoE. This is sup
Recommendation No.7, and the CMCoE recommendations.
legally non-binding, can be indirectly enforced, and are relevCoE member.
III. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS I
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
29/84
and the Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of th
2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and
men and women in matters of employment and occupation - recast (R
The Race Equality Directive prescribes the obligation of states to de
the promotion of equal treatment of all persons without discriminati
of racial or ethnic origin. These bodies may form part of agencies ch
level with the defence of Human Rights or the safeguard of individu
competences of such a body should include: provision of independen
tims of discrimination in pursuing their complaints about discrimi
independent surveys concerning discrimination, and publicatio
reports and recommendations on any issues relating to such discrim
This directive does not require the set up of a new body, as it may bwith a mandate vested under this directive. Although this directive bin
States to create a body only related to the grounds of racial and ethn
shows that most EU member states have decided to establish bodies t
tiple grounds of discrimination.98 As the directive itself does not g
guidelines when it comes to the implementation, authors argue that t
as well as the ECRI recommendations can be taken as guidelines sin
states are members of both the UN and the CoE, regardless of the f
ments coming from these two organisations are soft law.99
Under the RECAST Directive, the Member States shall designate and
sary arrangements for a body or bodies for the promotion, analyssupport of equal treatment of all persons without discrimination on
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
30/84
which may be part of a wider NHRI. Its competences shall incl
pendent assistance to victims of discrimination in pursuing thei
crimination; conduct of independent surveys concerning discrim
independent reports and recommendations on any issues relat
tion; and at the appropriate level exchange of available inform
ding European bodies such as (any) future European Institute fo
In sum, the EU has to a greater extent dealt with regulating the o
ing bodies mandated as equality and anti-discrimination bodie
general Human Rights mandate. It does not require that a spec
the mandate as prescribed within the directives, but rather tha
dated with the competences, meaning that it can also be an ex
institution with a general Human Rights mandate. In addition
States are both UN and CoE members, all the standards gen
organisations, are relevant for the EU members as well.
* * *
The text above contains details on the relevant international H
dards related to the NHRIs at both universal and European lemember of the UN, State Party to all international documents
dards within the UN, as well as a member state of the CoE, and an
all standards described above are relevant for the study. Stand
to OPCAT or CRPD were not considered herein, so a note that a
with competences under these two treaties will suffice the prese
In accordance with the standards elaborated above, the consi
tions in the next section focuses on the following: formal esta
functions, competences and responsibilities, membership, op
III. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS I
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
31/84
On a general note, it needs to be emphasised that there is no require
special institution under any of the NHRI standards considered herei
a state will be in compliance with its CRPD obligations, if it assigns a
tion/body with the competences as required by this convention, with
special institution/body to this end, for example. There is also no re
type of the institution (whether it should be an Ombudsperson, a Hum
Human Rights Commission, etc).
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
32/84
IV. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS
INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDON
Part of the institutional structure in Macedonia is consisted of inst
protection and promotion of Human Rights. There was no instit
ICC until October 2011 when the Ombudsperson was accredited
is still no NHRI accredited with an A status.104
This part gives an overview of the institutions in Macedonia tHuman Rights promotion and protection functions. These are t
the CPAD. Although there are other institutions which, because
have been considered as well, such as those tasked with minori
(the Agency for Realisation of the Rights of the Communit
Implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement), work
Parliament (the Commission for Equal Opportunities of Wo
Standing Inquiry Committee for Protection of Civil Freedoms an
tors within the government (such as coordinators for equal o
Decade of Roma Inclusion), they will not be considered as the
classic NHRI mandate and competences. Each section gives an
framework per institution, identifies gaps compared to the i
(please see part two above), and closes with recommendations
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
33/84
1. FormalEstablishment oftheOmbudsperson
The establishment of the Ombudsperson105
has a legal basis in the Republic of Macedonia (the Constitution). Precisely, Article 77,
Amendment XI, foresees its establishment. Under this article, the
elected by a majority vote of the total number of Representatives
within which there must be a majority of the votes of the
Representatives who belong to communities not in the majority in
Macedonia. This institution is mandated with protection of the const
rights of the citizens in case of violation by bodies of state administra
bodies and organizations with public mandates.106 It shall give par
safeguarding the principles of non-discrimination and equitable
communities in public bodies at all levels and in other areas of publi
The Ombudsperson is, according to the Law on the Ombudsperson
and replacing the 1997 Law on Ombudsperson), an independent
organ.108 Under the law, it does not need an authorisation from t
undertake actions falling within its competences. It contains provisio
of the Ombudsperson and her/his deputies, its competences and
transparency, accountability as well as positioning within the syste
the Ombudsperson adopts its own acts for internal organisation,
administrative as well as expert services.109 There is a provision on
tion to ethnic background and the selection of the Deputy-Ombudspe
The Ombudsperson is funded from the state budget through a sepa
According to the law, it is in a position to negotiate its funds with the g
parliamentary session during which the budget is adopted, there s
voting for the budget allocated to it.111
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
IV NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
34/84
The Ombudsperson submits its report once a year to the Parlia
where government representatives are present. Furthermore
publicised in the media. The reporting (both domestically, and
goes separately for the activities conducted as part of the functio
as a NPM. The Ombudsperson can also submit special reports t
government in which it has local offices, related to the work of t
From this section one can note that there is room for impro
Notably, the SCA in the accreditation report underlines that
selection, as provided by the law does not provide a clear, tran
tory selection process that promotes the independence of, and p
Ombudsman, for example, the SCA notes that vacancies for the
advertised publicly and that the selection process of candida
broad consultation with civil society.113
In addition, pluralism is limited to ethnicity only. Provisions
institution should mirror the society as a whole, which is the es
as a principle. This was also underlined by the SCA, stating that
text of Paris Principles, refers to broader representation of M
just ethnicity.114
2. Functions,CompetencesandResponsibilities oftheThe Ombudsperson is tasked to protect the constitutional right
izens when these are violated by bodies of state administration a
organizations with public mandates [...] [, and it] shall give parti
guarding the principles of non-discrimination and equitable r
munities in public bodies at all levels and in other areas of public
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
35/84
The Ombudsperson can propose legislative amendments, including
domestic legislation with international Human Rights law obligation
petent to make law proposals to the Parliament. It can also initiate p
the Constitutional Court for assessing the constitutionality of legal ac
Within the frame of its protective mandate, the Ombudsperson can g
tions, proposals, opinions and indications on the manner of removal
infringements, propose implementation of procedure pursuant to la
tive for commencing disciplinary proceedings against an official, i.e.
son, and submit a request to the competent Public Prosecutor for ini
dure in order to determine a criminal responsibility. It can initiate a
grounds of a complaint filed to it, or on its own initiative. The state ad
ies and other bodies and organisations that have public authorisati
co-operate with the Ombudsperson and upon his/hers request to pro
all the evidence, data and information, notwithstanding the degree
and to enable him/her to enforce the procedure. Moreover, the
Republic, the Parliament, and the Government, as well as all oth
heading bodies supervised under its mandate, have to admit perso
delay to the Ombudsperson, should he/she demand this. The Ombud
to keep a state and official secret in a manner, and under the condit
law and other regulation.117
The Ombudsperson should monitor the situation by safeguardin
respecting the constitutional and legal rights of the citizens, protectin
tion, as well as safeguarding the principles of equality and adequ
representation. This can include visiting and getting an insight into th
lic bodies.118
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
36/84
expanding its mandate in the Law when it comes to assisting Hum
cation and vocational training, as well as Human Rights inform
raising, even though in practice the Ombudsman is already und
for which it was commended by the SCA.119 Promoting excel
standards through these activities, as well as through its own w
further raising the credibility and accessibility of the institution.1
tion can be further expanded with additional research competen
lication of specialised studies so to assist Human Rights educ
awareness raising.
Moreover, if awarded sufficient resources, this institution can c
date. Expanding its mandate beyond the public sector should be
Additionally, although international law treaties ratified by law
Constitution are considered part of domestic law, considerin
these documents, it seems that the article on the mandate of th
Constitution and in the law would be improved by adding an
these treaties. Similar to this, in the accreditation report, th
Ombudsperson to advocate for a wider mandate that includ
international, regional and domestic instruments, covers all a
and gives it explicit functions in the area of both protection and p
rights.121
3. MembersoftheOmbudspersonThe Ombudsperson is both elected and dismissed by the Parli
vote of the total number of Representatives, within which ther
the votes of the total number of Representatives who belong to
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
37/84
majority of the population of Macedonia), on a proposal by the co
body within the Parliament. He/she is elected for a term of eight yea
ity for one re-election. The Ombudsperson has deputies which ar
period of eight years and entitled to one re-election. The
Ombudsperson and the deputy-Ombudspersons are not compatibl
another public function and profession or with political party membe
The Law on Ombudsperson foresees a list of criteria which a pers
order to be elected as Ombudsperson/Deputy-Ombudsperson. Na
dates need to: fulfil the general terms stipulated by the Law on Emplo
Administration Bodies; be graduated lawyers with working experie
of over nine years for Ombudsperson and seven years for deputy
including proven activities in the sphere of protection of citizens righ
tation for performing the duties of the Ombudsperson/Deputy-Omb
The list of criteria for dismissal of the Ombudsperson/Deputy-Ombu
dismissal on ones own request; in case of criminal conviction by an u
tence of imprisonment to at least six months; permanent loss of psyc
ty to perform the Ombudsperson function, determined by a compe
retirement according to age; incompetent, biased and unconscie
ance.124 The Ombudsperson and the Deputy-Ombudspersons are
unlike the administration working in the Ombudsperson office.125
It seems that certain improvements can be done when it comes to t
dure of the Ombudsperson, in view of securing the principle of pl
above, the only guarantee with regards to pluralism is only in terms
relation to the process of selection of the Deputy-Ombudspersons. T
dure of the Ombudsperson and his/her deputies prescribes that the
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
38/84
4. OperatingPrinciplesoftheOmbudspersonThe Ombudsperson Institution is an independent and self-
Ombudsperson and the Deputy-Ombudspersons should abide b
sciousness, responsibility,126 competence, and impartiality.127
bers of a political party, and cannot be performing another pub
The Ombudsperson and her/his deputies enjoy certain prote
their actions as well as to expressing their opinion. They cannot given opinions and actions, measures and activities undertake
their function.129
The Ombudsperson Institution is accountable for the performan
mits an annual report to the Parliament which is further consid
presence of a Government representative. In addition, it alsreport as a NPM, and both reports are published in the media. T
also prepare reports on the work of its local offices for the auth
local self-government, and can publish these reports in the me
The Ombudsperson is obliged by law to cooperate with actors
competences. It can join networks of interest, as well as coope
organisations, which has been the case in Macedonia. Coopera
regional bodies related to torture and inhuman and degrading
especially important (because of the NPM mandate). As noted a
the Ombudsperson was accredited by the ICC with a B statu
Ombudsperson can participate as an observer in the NHRIs intework and meetings, but it cannot vote or hold office with the Bur
tees. It also means that it cannot participate in the sessions of the
under a NHRI badge, nor can it take the floor under any agenda
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
39/84
In terms of accessibility, the Ombudsperson has offices in a clearly m
the centre of the capital, as well as local offices with addresses publi
net. In terms of language accessibility, the institution accepts comp
official languages.
In terms of operating principles, the institution is well positioned. A
was made, however, by SCA that the cooperation with the internatio
system should be enhanced.132 In its evaluation, the SCA en
[Ombudsperson] to actively engage with the ICC, the European Grou
as international and national CSOs and civil society organizations.1
5. ResourcesoftheOmbudspersonThe Ombudsperson134 has one main office in Skopje, and six regiona
Kicevo, Stip, Strumica, Kumanovo, and Bitola.135All offices have adm
at their disposal. The law provides that in order to execute its manda
ly and successfully, the Ombudsperson can organise its work in un
units for protection of the rights of the children and the persons with d
non-discrimination, adequate and equitable representation of the ciand other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment. T
dated to the Ombudsperson with OPCAT - prevention of torture and
man or degrading treatment or punishment, are undertaken by the
Organizational Unit for prevention of torture and other cruel, inhu
treatment of punishment - the National Preventive Mechanism.136
As mentioned above, the Ombudsperson is funded from the state bu
arate budget line. According to the law, it is in a position to negotiate
government during a parliamentary session within which the state
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
40/84
Thus, the parliament should schedule a special discussion
Ombudsperson, including a separate voting for it.137
Although the formulation of the law with regards to the fun
established standards, that is not the case with the practice
reports claim lack of funds not only to exercise the vested com
institutional and human rights promotion. Specifically, its 201
lack of funds designated for the functioning of the NPM,138 also
in the accreditation report.139
6. RecommendationsRecommendations for upgrading the work of the Ombudsperso
the Paris Principles were already made by the ICC, and are
accreditation report. The present analysis includes both these
well as additional ones made on the basis of the conducted rese
- Members: amend the election procedure for the Ombudsp
lic call, as well as to enhance the participativeness of th
possible consultations with CSOs. Attention should also b
ment of the Ombudsperson for a single non-renewab
reduce susceptibility to political pressure.
- Pluralism: enter guarantees to enhance the pluralism of
manner that will reflect the society as a whole and not jus
- Competences:
o Consider the expansion of the Ombudspersons man
sector.
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
41/84
tion and vocational training, as well as Human Rights
awareness-raising, through more active engagement in s
o Enhance research competences, including the publication o
ies to assist Human Rights education, information and awar
o The Constitution and the law should include, as part of th
mandate of the Ombudsperson, guaranteeing the rights
international law treaties ratified by law in accordance wi
and considered part of domestic law.
- Cooperation: enhance cooperation with the international Hum
- Resources: allocation of sufficient funds for the Ombudsperson
mandate.
B. CommissionforProtectionagainstDiscriminationThe CPAD is the other identified NHRI in the case of Macedonia. Altho
a little over a year, its establishing and functioning has offered valua
present analysis.
1. FormalEstablishment oftheCommissionforProtectionagainstDiscrimination
CPAD was established with the Law on Prevention and Protection aga
(Anti-discrimination Law) adopted in April 2010, as an independenbody140 (legal person, based in the capital - Skopje). The first CPA
appointed in December 2010, and the CPAD itself started to operate f
implementation of the Anti-discrimination Law, on 01 January 2011.
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
42/84
Under law, the CPAD is free to exercise its mandate independent
prior authorisation from the Government. It is funded throu
However, it is independent, as it is tasked with the adoption of
acts.145 The law does not foresee any administrative support for it
administrative and technical tasks of it will be undertaken by the C
According to the Anti-discrimination Law, CPAD is obliged to
annually to the Parliament.147
There are several inconsistencies of the CPAD in respect to its
both as a consequence of the legal provisions and their implem
tencies related to the resources, independence and pluralism g
notable ones (for the ones focusing on resources and independe
The guarantees for pluralism of the CPAD cannot be considered
discrimination Law provides for pluralism only in terms of ethni
introduce any guarantees for a pluralism of the composition
reflection of all societal groups and society as a whole.
With regards to accountability, and in relation to the report
Parliament, the Parliament has no legal obligation to discuss thnor has the Executive to be present in case such a discussion is h
just formal submission of the report to the Parliament without di
ing any possible issues that CPAD might have raised in the r
Parliament has not held a discussion on the first annual report s
2. Functions,CompetencesandResponsibilities oftheforProtectionagainstDiscrimination
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
43/84
fields151).152 The provision on the protected grounds explicitly inclu
ones: sex, race, colour of skin, gender, marginalised group belong
language, citizenship, social origin, religion or religious belief, oth
education, political affiliation, personal or social status, mental or p
age, family or marital status, and property status.153 This is an open
closing with any other grounds foreseen by law or a ratified intern
Furthermore, CPAD is tasked to follow the implementation of the A
Law, propose needed amendments of acts,155 and give opinion on dvance for the protection against discrimination.156 It can also recom
the implementation of the principle of equality to state bodies.157
Another CPAD competence is to deal with individual cases, and to
recommendations. It should also provide information on the proced
persons who have filed a case, including the possibilities for seeking j
and possible procedural outcomes.158
CPAD can undertake activities on promotion of, and education abou
Rights and non-discrimination,159 including informing the public ab
cases.160 It can also undertake research, prepare studies, and condu
to discrimination, as well as collect statistical and other data, and es
of relevance to its mandate.161
151 These fields are: work and labour relations; education, science and sport; social secof social protection, pension and disability insurance, health insurance and health p
administration; housing; public informing and media; access to goods and services;
in syndicate, political parties, associations of citizens and foundations or any ot
upon participation; culture; and other areas determined by law. Source: Law on Pr
Against Discrimination [ ]
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
44/84
The above shows that the competences vested in the CPAD by t
Law do not cover all the competences a NHRI should have. Wi
Human Rights legislation, the mandate should be extended and
ly include monitoring of all legislation, executive acts and pract
mandate, including a special focus on the impact they might ha
ties and on marginalised groups.
In the case of minorities and marginalised groups, the CPAD nee
dure on an individual bases, in accordance to the needs of the
Anti-discrimination Law does not leave room for CPAD to pay
dealing with cases involving persons from ethnic communitie
groups. The only provision for adjustment is in terms of langua
discrimination Law, although in line with the Law on Languages,
inatory upon applicants with different mother tongue than the o
local self-government of residence, as opposed to those with s
the official language. Such a claim is supported by the fact that t
local offices, nor its procedure is in any way directly connected to
of local self-government. When one takes into consideration the
difference in treatment does not seem to be both legitimate and
When it comes to international Human Rights law, the CPADs co
developed, as it lacks to: promote and ensure harmonization
with international Human Rights standards; encourage ratificati
mote and contribute to training of key groups (without prejud
role of professional organisations); and promote and ensure ha
tic legislation with minority standards laid out in universal or re
CPADs competences could also be widened with respect to Hu
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
45/84
from the first annual report submitted to the Parliament,162 as well a
sion of a comprehensive CSO shadow report on the first year of its fu
3. MembersoftheCommissionforProtectionagainstDiscThe CPAD is composed of seven members appointed by the Parliamen
didates proposed by the Commission for elections and appointments
the Parliament) on the basis of the applications to the public add for meThe only two requirements for standing as a candidate for the CPAD a
ship of the country, and education and experience in Human Rights or
The only requirement for plurality of this body is adequate and equ
tion165 (i.e. representation of the ethnic groups). Drawing from othe
argue that equal representation of sexes is also mandatory for this b
bers engagement in the CPAD is not a full-time job and is not prim
They are, however, remunerated for the engagement. The mandat
with a possibility for re-election. The President is elected by the CPAD
members, for a mandate of one year.167 About its activities, CPA
reports to the Parliament.168
The selection of the first composition of the CPAD showed that the me
do not provide enough guarantees for the appointment of compete
162 Commission for Protection against Discrimination. Annual Report of the CommissioDiscrimination [
the Republic of Macedonia Website. . Last accessed: 29 June 20
163 Najcevska, Mirjana. [Shadow Report for a
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
46/84
deal with such a complex area as discrimination. The formulat
education and experience as education and experience in Hum
ences rather than only Human Rights is already problematic, a
ty for persons with social sciences experience or education and
rience or education in Human Rights to become members (too
and specific area such as equality and non-discrimination). Thi
as in the appointment of the first composition of the CPAD perso
tion, experience or expertise on equality and non-discriminatRights in general, were elected as its members.169
Moreover, this body does not abide by the plurality principle, as
provides only for pluralism in relation to ethnic background,170
that its composition fully mirrors the society. On the first call fo
there were applicants representing marginalised groups (peop
TIQ), which although well known for their knowledge and exp
equality and non-discrimination (including an expert engaged
appointed as members. On the contrary, several of the ele
Human Rights related experiences.171 In addition, the discussio
session devoted to the appointment on members, prove theestablishment of the first composition of the first equality body i
ly politicised one.172
4. OperatingPrinciplesoftheCommissionforProtectionagainstDiscrimination
According to the law, CPAD should cooperate with various ac
Ombudsperson on cases of discrimination, bodies competent fo
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
47/84
principle of equality in the local self-government, as well as nation
with equality from other countries, and international organisati
Human Rights.173 When it comes to dealing with individual cases,
cooperate with all natural and legal persons, state bodies, units of l
ment, organisations with public authorisations, etc.174
The legal framework leaves a lot of space for the CPAD to exercise
the field of cooperation. It could benefit, however, from an additiona
accent on cooperation with CSOs, alike the one present in the EU equ
If one distances from the legal framework, and looks at the 2011 an
CPAD, can easily see that it has barely exercised its cooperation c
would expect that the CPAD would first initiate and/or enter into co
Ombudsperson, as an institution with overlapping competences. H
annual reports of the CPAD175 and of the Ombudsperson,176 show tha
remains at the level of meetings, and is not yet even formalised wit
for Understanding or a similar act that would further facilitate it.
The cooperation with CSOs seems to be very limited too, as is the one
organisations. The annual report of the CPAD177 shows that it has re
2012 for joining the European Network of Equality Bodies EQUINET. H
ow report on the work of the CPAD reveals that the motivation behind
ship in EQUINET is tied to the use of EU funds (through the IPA program
ly notes that there seems to be a lack of a deeper understanding amon
bers of the purpose and possible benefits of gaining an observer statu
173 Law on Prevention and Protection Against Discrimination [
] Offi i l G f h R bli f M d i N 50/2010 A 24 (1
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
48/84
Accessibility, as both an operating and a founding principle, see
CPAD. This body remains highly inaccessible due to its infrastr
psychological barriers. Its premises are in the same building wh
of Interiors offices are. Moreover, the physical accessibility of t
tionable.179 CPAD has no local offices. The language barrier wa
the section on the functions, competences and responsibilities. F
process which marked the appointment procedure, including t
CPAD members are working in the executive and legislatadversely affect the willingness of (potential) victims to approa
shows low level of trust and familiarity with the CPAD.180
5. ResourcesoftheCommissionforProtectionagainsUnder the Anti-discrimination Law, CPAD181 is funded from the s
can also acquire funds from other sources.182 This law neither f
of a secretariat (or any other kind of administrative support for t
lishment of local offices. Such legal framing of the potential for
problematic.
In its first year the CPAD relied on administrative support from
and Social Policy (MLSP), which is highly problematic in term
efficiency, and especially since the complaints filled in the first m
to the MLSP. Later on volunteers were hired (including a jurist v
the receipt of the complaints. This is highly non-recommendabling of the protection mandate, due to its sensitive nature. But, ev
tion mandate, one cannot expect all the competences prescribed
ination Law to be undertaken without administrative support, e
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
49/84
exercise of the mandate to its full extent. Moreover, the current expe
tive support provision does not allow for the creation of institutional
Financial resources can also be an issue, as the funds for CPADs func
the Government, while it is not in a position to negotiate it, which wa
lem. In the first year of its functioning, the allocated funds were no
only the honoraria of the members in the amount provided for by la
raria equals two average monthly salaries in the country),184 let alon
for equipping offices, etc.
The premises of the CPAD further hinder its independence, as are cur
ing of the national radio and television broadcasting company, whe
tration sections are also based, including the Ministry of Interior. As
this renders the accessibility of the premises. CPAD does not have loc
According to the Anti-discrimination Law, as noted above, the admin
nical support of the CPAD falls upon its members. At first, administr
provided by civil servants from the MLSP, and later by volunteer
resources seem to challenge the work of the CPAD.
The accessibility of the CPAD is also hindered by the language babove, in the section on the functions, competences and responsibili
6. RecommendationsThe following recommendations can be made with regards to CPAD
the current legal framework. Most of them would entail amendmen
crimination Law:
- Pluralism: enter a guarantee for pluralism of CPAD beyond eth
IV. NATIONAL HUMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
50/84
- Competences: expand CPAD competences to include:
o Monitoring of all legislation relevant to its mandate i
and practices. It is recommendable such a monitoring
these acts and practices might have on the ethnic com
alised groups.
o Promote and ensure harmonization of domestic legis
al Human Rights standards; encourage ratification of
mote and ensure harmonization of domestic legislat
dards laid out in universal or regional documents.
o Initiate or assist Human Rights research, formal ed
trainings, provide information and advice to all releva
its mandate.
o Monitor the Human Rights situation in the country. Thi
in a way to complement the already existing obligat
and other data, create databases and conduct studies
- Accessibility:
o Language accessibility: amend the provision which reguages re the complaints procedure, so that it allow
filed in any of the languages of the communities mentio
the Constitution.
o Physical accessibility: change of premises to a place
accessible to all, and especially to people with disabilo Public credibility:
- Distance the CPAD from the government, which w
d i i t ti t f MLSP th
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
51/84
- Cooperation: enter special provision for cooperation with th
CSOs.
- Resources:
o Allow under law the creation of a secretariat, or any form
support for the CPAD. Following this, CPAD might consider e
ing groups from amongst its members to work on specific is
identified as the most burning issues, or to work on specif
crimination. Such working groups can be assisted by in
experts. Under CPADs internal acts, there is a possibility fo
working groups.186
o Due consideration should be given to the possibility for pro
the members of the CPAD, by making this their full time job
o CPAD needs to be in a position, alike the Ombudsperson,
annual budget with the Government. These funds need t
CPAD to be able to exercise its full mandate.
o Consider establishing formal links with the region
Ombudsperson, in order to expand the reach of the CPAD.
* * *
The analysis on the Ombudsperson and the CPAD above shows that
reforming the framework, as it highlights shortcomings in relation to
lishment, functions, competences and responsibilities, membershipples as well as resources of these institutions. It shows that both th
NHRIs will benefit from their alignment with the international standa
laps will be resolved in a manner that will enhance legal certainty
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
52/84
V. CONCLUSION:
APPROACHINGPOSSIBLE REFORMS
This study identified the need for reforms of the institutional fra
work of the NHRIs, and highlighted the reforms points, as a
opening of a public nationwide consultation process.
The study gave a general introduction on NHRIs, followed by a
tional standards on NHRIs, and an assessment of the institutions
on their legal and policy aspects, and highlighting the incompa
national standards. A matrix summarising the findings of a com
NHRIs and an assessment of the use effectiveness of the reso
NHRIs in Macedonia are annexed to this study.
Two main problems stood out in relation to NHRIs, which are
comes to the way the country is dealing with Human Rights in g
consideration and strategic approach to Human Rights, and lack
The lack of strategic approach can be seen from the fact that Mac
National Action Plan for Human Rights or any other strategic
Human Rights.187 Most of the Human Rights related reforms in the
en by the EU integration of the country; the most recent case be
Anti-discrimination Law and the establishment of one of the instit
study, CPAD. However, even when this is the case, these reforms
hi h h b d i th t hi h h th t h it t
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
53/84
which have been done in the country which show that when it comes to
Rights obligations, the country has not been using its maximum availa
The recommendations sections on the two NHRIs suggest that there a
disposal if a possible approaching to reforms of the institutional f
cussed. Some of the advocated reforms are more burning, espec
while others can be done only once a wide public consultation proces
ers is opened, with wide and meaningful participation of the CSOs
political will and sufficient funds to implement the envisaged ref
assessment of the use effectiveness of the resources annexed to this
cussing the challenges and possible solutions related to the establis
accordance with the Paris Principles, Mirjana Najcevska, author of
articles, reports and policy documents on NHRIs in Macedonia, also r
tance of the political will for the opening of such a process to be posuggests formation of a group of parliamentarians and high Governm
porting the NHRI idea. In order to open a consultative process, s
importance of reaching a certain level of awareness on the importa
an institution, while the very process of implementation needs
Government.188
A detailed consideration of all possible models for reforming the in
work is beyond the scope of this study. This should be the task o
process. Najcevska highlights that the NHRI idea, including possible
mandate, membership, etc. of this institution needs to grow as a
Government too.189A note can be added here that many options fomodel are at disposal. All options revolve around the two institution
the Ombudsperson and the CPAD, such as: both the Ombudsperson a
ue to function with the recommendations as given in sections III
implemented; both the Ombudsperson and CPAD to continue to
V. CONCLUSI
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
54/84
implemented; both the Ombudsperson and CPAD to continue to
mendations as given in sections III-A-6, and III-B-6 to be imple
ally a new centre that will be concerned with Human Rights rese
discontinue the CPAD and transfer in full its competences to the
the Ombudsperson and the CPAD into one Human Rights Centre
The consultations done within the frame of the process of co
expert group and the international conference) pointed to a pr
the participants. This is that both the CPAD and the Ombudsper
exist, but their mandate, membership, independence, and o
above, should be improved. This model was mostly favoured ba
The first argument is that the Ombudsperson should continue to
institution with a tradition and institutional capacity. The secon
CPAD should not be discarded yet regardless of the many deficilishing it, and the problems its functioning in practice thus far sh
new institution.
Regardless of the fact which model would be the best option fro
there must be an open public participatory consultation proce
Rights National Action Plan, including discussions on reforming
work. Thus, the model should be a product of this kind of consu
such a process is a long-term engagement, and some of the p
urgent for the two institutions, a priority should be given. In the c
should be placed on the efforts to up-grade the functioning of th
with the Paris Principles and the recommendations of the ICC, inting A status accreditation.
Last, but certainly not least, is the political will which is essent
ANNEX I COMPARATIVE ANALY
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
55/84
NHRI192 CASE / CRITERIA OMBUDSPERSON OFCROATIA
GERMANHUM
Formal Establishment
Legal Grounds - Constitution of the Republic ofCroatia (1990; consolidatedtext 2010) (Art.93)
- People's Ombudsperson Act(2012)
- Decision Federal Prevised v
Internal Organisation - 1 Ombudsperson- (at least) 3 Deputy
Ombudspersons (divisionaccording to service)
- General A- Board of
member- Board of
deputy-C
Independence - Autonomous and independent- Appointed with act of the
Parliament- 8-year term with one possi-
bility for re-election- Immunity mirroring the one of
the MPs
- Financial independence (see:Resources)
- PoliticallyindependGovernm
- Board of civil socie
voting rigan Huma
- FinancialResource
Accountability - Submit annual report andother reports when needed
- Submit aTrustees
ANNEX I: COMPARATIVE ANALY
OF MODELS OF NHRIINSTITUTIONS
Matrix of summary findings from Comparative Study of Five NHRIs
[Puki Pravobranitelj] [Deu
M
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
56/84
DANISH INSTITUTE FORHUMAN RIGHTS
[Institut forMenneskerettigheder]
OMBUDSPERSON OF SPAIN[Defensor Del Pueblo] O
Formal Establishment
- Act no.411 Governing theEstablishment of the DanishCentre for InternationalStudies and Human Rights(2002)
- Spanish Constitution (1978)(Art.54)
- Organic Act 3/1981, April 6th,regarding the Ombudsperson(1981)
- Co(Ar
- OrgPub(19
- Board (13 members)- Executive Director
- 1 Ombudsperson- 2 Deputy Ombudspersons
(division according totopic/theme)
- General Secretary
- 1 O- 1 D
(ch
- Independent self-governinginstitution
- Board members: appointed byUniversities (no member isappointed by the Government)
- 4-year term a possibility forone re-appointment
- Financial independence (see:Resources)
- Autonomous and independent- Appointed with an act of the
Parliament- Appointed with a three/fifths
majority for a five year term- Financial independence (see:
Resources)
- Ind- Ap
Par- 5-y
bili- Enj
the
flag- FinRes
- Present annual report to theParliament Standing
- Report discussed in parlia-ment
- SubPar
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
NHRI192 CASE / CRITERIA OMBUDSPERSON OF GERMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
57/84
NHRI192 CASE / CRITERIA OMBUDSPERSON OFCROATIA
GERMA
HUM
Membership
Pluralism - Centre for Human Rights: civilsociety and academia
- Council for Human Rights: civilsociety, national minorities,academia, media
- NPM: 2 from CSOs and 2 fromacademia
- General Aice, civil spolitical psion
- Board of tives of gotions, CSO
Selection process - Criteria: lawyer with min. 15years experience in the field
- Procedure: elected andrelieved by the Parliament
with a simple majority
- Employees: open and trans-parent procedure; civil ser-vant status
- Managemappointmgovernmsities and
- Employe
ment: emfollowing
Decision making - Collegium (Ombudspersonand deputy-Ombudspersons),however final decisions made
by the Ombudspersonher/himself
- ManagerDirectors
- General A
Board of Tand substBoard of
Functions, competences and responsibilities
Domestic Human RightsLegislation and Policies
- Legislative changes re rightsenshrined in the Constitution
and the Law
- Provide esentative
Parliamegovernm
International Human RightsStandards
- Protect and promote HumanRights enshrined in ratified
- Proposal
internatio
[Puki Pravobranitelj] [DeuM
ANNEX I: COMPARATIVE ANAL
DANISH INSTITUTE FOR OMBUDSPERSON OF SPAIN O
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
58/84
DANISH INSTITUTE FOR
HUMAN RIGHTS
[Institut forMenneskerettigheder]
OMBUDSPERSON OF SPAIN[Defensor Del Pueblo]
O
Membership
- Board: representatives electedby the Council of HumanRights, universities, DanishRector's Office, employees of
the Institute
- NPM: civil society, legal pro-fession, medical and psycho-logical associations
- NPGrobacexp
outhermo
- Management boards underappointment procedure forgovernmental offices, univer-sities and CSOs
- Employees and top manage-
ment: employed by the insti-tute following public calls
- Criteria: any person of age- Procedure: elected and
relieved by the Parliamentwith a simple majority
- Employees: status of civil ser-
vants or temporary civil ser-vants
- Cri- Pro
Premeat l
anyandParmacan
- Managerial decisions: InstituteDirector
- Coordination and InternalRegime Board(Ombudsperson and her/his
deputies, Secretary General);final decisions made by theOmbudsperson or the com-petent deputies
- Deappthe
Functions, competences and responsibilities
- Advise the Parliament andGovernment
- Contribute to domestic imple-mentation of Human Rights
- Can file cases to theConstitutional Tribunal
- Can initiate habeas corpusproceedings
- CaCo
- Am- Pro
tive
- Central equality body (as perDirective 2000/43)
- NPM for Spain - Pro
Rig
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
NHRI192 CASE / CRITERIA OMBUDSPERSON OF GERMA
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
59/84
NHRI CASE / CRITERIA OMBUDSPERSON OFCROATIA
GERMA
HU
Human Rights SituationMonitoring
- Has Human Rights monitoringcompetence
- Issue warnings, give notices, makerecommendations, publish opin-ions
- Conduct surveys, collect andanalyse statistical data, and informthe Parliament on discrimination
- Has Huming com
- Active pnationa
Human Rights Education,Capacity Building, and
Awareness Raising
- Proactive in education, capacitybuilding and informing on equalityand non-discrimination
- Meetings, awareness raising andinformative sessions with victims
of discrimination, and with localauthorities on local/regional level
- Human(includifor teacbased ationers
coopera- Researc- Develo
and con
Networking and Cooperation
Domestic Level - Cooperate with the Parliament,and with officials and bodies withpublic powers
- Strong cooperation with CSOs rework on equality
- Link bement an
- Forum fand infogovern
International Level - Participate in reporting to themonitoring bodies and for the UPR- Member in several associations of
NHRIs
- Membetions of- Active p
nationa
Resources
[Puki Pravobranitelj][Deut
Me
ANNEX I: COMPARATIVE ANAL
DANISH INSTITUTE FOR OMBUDSPERSON OF SPAIN O
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
60/84
DANISH INSTITUTE FOR
HUMAN RIGHTS[Institut for
Menneskerettigheder]
OMBUDSPERSON OF SPAIN[Defensor Del Pueblo]
O
- Has Human Rights monitoringcompetence
- Publish annual reports onHuman Rights in the countryand on specific subjects
- Prepare and submit alternativereports to the monitoring bodies
- Active participation in nationalUPR processes
- Has Human Rights monitoringcompetence
- Report to the Parliament, interalia, on the Human Rights situ-ation
- Conduct studies and surveys
- Hin
- Rth
- Nga
- Pis
- Human Rights education- Human Rights research and
(policy) advice- Information on Human Rights
issues
- Promote equal treatment (rerace and ethnic origin)
- Assist discrimination victims- Run library and documenta-
tion facilities- Promote coordination re
Human Rights activities
- Low activity re promotionand training
- Hd
- Mv
- In
H- P- M
N
Networking and Cooperation
- Link between the govern-ment and the CSOs
- Award annual prize on equalopportunities and diversity inthe workplace to companies
- Cooperate with theParliament, and with offi-cials and bodies with publicpowers
- Strong cooperation withCSOs re work of the NPM
- CPcili
- C
- Very active at internationallevel (over 75% of its activities)- Reporting to the monitoring
bodies
- Member in several associa-tions of NHRIs - Mtio
Resources
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
61/84
ANNEX II: ASSESSMENT OF THE
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
62/84
ANNEX II: ASSESSMENT OF THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF TRESOURCES ALLOCATO THE NHRIs IN MA
A. RationaleThis part of the study provides an overview and assessment of
use of resources allocated to the two institutions analyzed in t
Ombudsperson Institution and the Commission for Protection with no intentions to serve as an in-depth financial analysis. M
no means exhaustive as it seeks to assess the functional and tec
respective institutions and their performance through an ass
quantitative elements that are based on publicly available data,
as an added value to the legal and policy analysis only.Institutional performance, likewise organizational performan
structures successful goals and objectives realization, while m
is crucial in understanding which policies and practices are w
formance has therefore the function of an alert if corrective mea
thus pushes management in the direction of results-based accoto the effective management and stability of the organizations.1
constitutionally guaranteed, such as the protection and promotion o
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN MACEDONIA: NORMATIVE MODELS AND CHALLENGES
-
8/13/2019 National Human Rights Institutions in Macedonia: normative models and challenges
63/84
and freedoms, as often the line between the declarative and actual a
cient resources for implementation, is a very fine one.
In the context of the human rights protection and promotion, it is very
bringing the complex social and cultural arguments in the discussion
or even estimate what is an optimal resource allocation, and further
proportion of allocated funds for protection as opposed to prom
between the curative and preventive aspects of the mechanisms.
In the light of the above, and given the fact that this assessment follo
previously presented thorough legal and policy analysis, the ma
effectiveness of the use of resources allocated to the two institutio
their performance. Thus, the study takes into consideration bo
efforts as well as the additional resources needed to further align th
and activities resting upon cooperation mechanisms of the two bod
the ten