national highways authority of indianhai.org.in/spw/process/m_p_r february15.pdfnational highways...

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

(MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Four - Laning of Panvel - Indapur Section

Of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) From Km 0.000 to 84.000 In The State Of Maharashtra

(Package No: NHDP - III/DL4/05)

Monthly Progress Report No - 37

February 2015

Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd.

Feedback Infra Private Limited.

In Association with

Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February ‘15 Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Executive Summary 03

1.0 THE PROJECT 10

1.1 Project Background 10

1.2 Project Location 10

1.3 Terrain and Alignment 12

1.4 Salient Features 12

1.5 Project Milestones 28

1.6 Location Map 28

2.0 THE ESTABLISHMENT 31

2.1 Project Organisation 31

2.2 Plant & Machinery 35

3.0 PROGRESS OF WORKS 38

3.1 Land Handing Over 38

3.2 Tree Cutting 39

3.3 Utility Shifting 39

3.4 Design Review 40

3.5 Progress of Major Works 42

3.6 Miscellaneous Works 44

3.7 Status of Project Facilities 44

3.8 Overall Physical / Financial Progress 44

4.0 QUALITY CONTROL & QUALITY ASSURANCE 53

4.1 Quality Control & Quality Assurance 53

4.2 Compliance / Non-Compliance 53

4.3 Routine Inspection by Independent Engineer 53

5.0 TRAFFIC & SAFETY 82

5.1 Safety Issues 82

5.2 Accident Data 82

5.3 Maintenance of Existing Highway 82

6.0 CONTRACTUAL ISSUES 84

6.1 Changes of Scope 84

6.2 Project Milestones 86

6.3 Land Acquisition issue between Balganga and Balivali Bridges 89

6.4 Un-approved Steel in use 90

6.5 Non construction of Exit/Entry Ramps 90

7.0 CRITICAL ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 91

8.0 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS 97


Appendices Page

A Comments on Concessionaire’s Monthly Progress Report 98

B Weather 99

C Important Visits 100

D Minutes of Progress Review Meeting 101

E Site Inspection Notes by Independent Engineer 102

F Letters from NHAI to Independent Engineer 105

G Letters from Concessionaire to Independent Engineer 107

H Letters Issued by Independent Engineer 108

I Accident Data & Observation 112

J Highway - Progress 114

K Structures - Progress 115

L Status Of Vehicular Underpasses - Progress 135

M Status Of Pedestrian Underpasses - Progress 138

N Slab/Box Culverts - Progress 142

O Pipe Culverts - Progress 145


Executive Summary

National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has entrusted the work of design,

construction, development, finance, operation and maintenance of Four-Laning of the

Panvel - Indapur section of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) in the state of Maharashtra under

NHDP phase - III on DBFOT basis (Package No : NHDP-III/DL4/05) to the Concessionaire

Supreme Panvel-Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (SPITPL). Concessionaire has deployed two EPC

Contractors for the construction of the Project (M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt.

Ltd. and M/s Supreme Infrastructure India Limited). M/s Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd. in

association with M/s Feedback Infra Private Limited has been appointed as the Independent

Engineer [IE] for the Project.

The Project stretch runs in plain and short stretch of hilly terrain. The Project includes

6 nos. Major Bridges, 23 nos. Minor Bridges, 2 nos. Flyovers, 3 nos. ROB’s, 11 nos.

Vehicular Underpasses, 15 nos. Pedestrian/Cattle Underpasses, 135+1 nos. Box/Slab

Culverts, 208+20 Pipe Culverts and 2 nos. Toll Plaza’s. The length of service road on LHS is

19.79 Km at on RHS is 17.76 Km totaling to 37.55 Km. and mostly located at urban areas of

the Project highway. The Panvel - Indapur section passes through the towns of Pen,

Vadkhal, Nagothane, Kolad and ends at km 84 before Indapur town.

Concession Agreement was signed on 21-01-2011 and the Appointed Date was 19-12-2011.

The scheduled date of completion of construction was 16-06-2014 (with 910 days

construction period).

Shifting of electrical poles, lines and MJP water pipeline are very slow. Shifting of ISPAT

water pipe line is still in progress. NHAI has given approval for laying CIDCO water pipeline

along the Project Highway. CIDCO has procured pipes and started laying pipes.

The quantities and percentage progress reported earlier by Concessionaire are on higher

side. Also, the lengths of highway works reported are more than actual lengths completed

at site. Independent Engineer approximately estimated the progress details. Now, as the

new construction programme alongwith Extension of Time (EOT) request by Concessioniare

is approved by NHAI Executive Committee, the progress details are evaluated based on the

scheduled progress given thereof. Though the scheduled construction period is over by 16-

06-’14, the cumulative achieved Physical Progress is 34.86 % as against Scheduled Physical

Progress of 39.89 %. That means, the slip is 5.03 %. The cumulative achieved Financial

Progress is Rs. 425.62 Crores (35.30%) as against scheduled Financial Progress of Rs.

482.83 Crores (40.04 %). That means, the slip is Rs. 57.21 Crores (4.74%).

Land Acquisition: Total land to be acquired is approximately 504 Ha. As per the

Concession Agreement, NHAI shall make best efforts to procure and grant, no later than 90

days from the Appointed Date, the Right of Way to the Concessionaire in respect of all land

included in the Appendix. NHAI may speed up balance land acquisition process.

Forest Land: Approval of Forest land except Ch. 0+000 to 20+100 issued by NHAI vide

letter No. NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/ Forest/2013/1201 dt.23-08-’13. The portion from


Ch 0+000 to 20+100 comes under Eco-sensitive zone. Approval for non core area (length

16.6 km) of Eco-Sensitive Zone has been obtained. However, PCCF Maharashtra has asked

to obtain NGT approval. Proposal for obtaining NBWL approval for core area (3.5 Km) has

been resubmitted to NBWL for reconsideration. Additional land of 1.3 Ha affecting 300m

length in Sukheli Khind need to be approved by MoEF.

No Progress of RE Wall Works: The construction RE wall started long back and now

completely stopped. This is major critical activity of the Project.

Non-Removal of Encumbrances : NHAI has issued notice under section 26 of the

Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 to unauthorized occupants in

some of the villages. Police support is sought. Most of the encroachments in Kollad, Pui,

Khamb, Varas gaon villages are removed. However, some buildings are yet to be removed

in other villages for want of payment, valuation etc. Concessionaire has not submitted the

programme for encroachment removal/building removal in spite of several reminders.

Concession Agreement, Clause 5.1.4 (e) specifies that “Concessionaire should make

reasonable efforts to facilitate the acquisition Concession Agreement, Clause 5.1.4 (e)

specifies that “Concessionaire should make reasonable efforts to facilitate the acquisition of

land required for the purpose of the Agreement”. Also, Concession Agreement, Clause 4.1.4

specifies that “Each party shall make all reasonable endeavors to satisfy the conditions

precedent within the time stipulated and shall provide the other party with such reasonable

cooperation as may be required to assist that party in satisfying the conditions precedent

for which that party is responsible”.

Very Slow Progress of Structures: The progress of structures (especially, major

bridges, flyovers and ROB’s) is very slow. Concessionaire should improve the progress of

structures. Overall progress is only 35%. Out of the total 26 underpasses not even single

underpass structure and its approaches completed so far.

Decision on Change of Scope Proposals: Concessionaire has submitted many Change

of Scope proposals. Some of them are still pending with NHAI for decision. Our records

show that Concessionaire has not submitted necessary clarifications /details for the following

Changes of Scope in spite of several reminders:

Sl No

Description of Change of Scope

Status

1 Deletion of Palaspe Flyover at Ch. 0+260

Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities in proper order so far.

2 Nallah diversion through box culvert at Ch. 4+900 to 4+993

Clarifications are yet to be submitted by Concessionaire.

3 Deletion of pipe culvert at Ch. 22+798

Concessionaire is advised to submit clarifications.

4 VUP at 23+450 (Hamarapur) on RHS main carriageway.

Proposal to be modified by Concessionaire considering that the additional VUP (as envisaged in CA) to be constructed at this location. Concessionaire is advised to submit details.


Sl No


Status

5 Underpasses in Pen City Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.

6 Additional Culverts at various locations

Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.

7 Exit/Entry Ramps at Start and End of Service road

Compliance to the observations not yet submitted.

Distress in new pavement: The newly laid DBM/BC is showing distress at many

locations. Concessionaire is advised to investigate in detail regarding such re-occurrence of

pavement distress during construction. Independent Engineer has insisted Concessionaire

to follow good engineering practices during pavement construction. It has been reminded

many times the importance of constructing kerb before taking up bituminous works, use of

PTR for DBM layer, constructing median drain and chutes, proper drainage arrangements

during construction, temperature control etc.

Un-approved Steel in use: Conditional Source approval for steel from M/s Shree

Vaishnav Alloys Pvt. Ltd was concurred on 01-05-’12 based on the condition that the

challans for billets (from main and major producers) and Manufacturer Test Certificate

(MTC) will be submitted. Meanwhile, NHAI informed that the steel shall be procured from

main and major producers only as per IRC: SP: 84-2009 which are SAIL, IRNL, TATA,

ESSAR, ISPAT, JSW Steel Ltd and JSL. No re- rolled steel shall be permitted in NHAI works.

In some of the minor bridges, Concessionaire has used Sangam TMT, SUN TMT etc. also

which were notified to the Concessionaire through various NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports.

Concessionaire was strictly advised to use steel produced from main and major producers

only as per NHAI’s circulars. The source approval for M/s Shree Vaishnav Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

was withdrawn with affect from 25-07-’13. Even after withdrawing concurrence,

Concessionaire has been using un-approved steel in many structures. Engineer has issued

letter to Concessionaire warning them that IE will be constrained to initiate necessary

punitive action as per the provisions of Concession Agreement without any further notice.

Project Milestones

The statues of various project milestones are given below:

Milestone Description Scheduled

Date Progress

Requirements Status

Milestone-I First anniversary of the Appointed Date

19-12-2012

Physical Progress : Not less than 25%

Expended Cost : Not less than 25% of total capital cost

Milestone - I was achieved on 01-05-’13. (That is during Extension of Time period). However, EOT is recently approved by the Executive Committee of NHAI.

Milestone-II

Second anniversary of the Appointed Date

19-12-2013


Expended Cost : Not less than 65% of total

Concessionaire vide their letter no SPITPL/ P-NHAI/ 2003-14/ 2471 dt. 28-01-’14 claimed and informed NHAI that they have achieved Milestone-II



Date Progress

Requirements Status

capital cost considering the available land. Recently, Executive Committee of NHAI has given Extension of Time (EOT) for achievement of Milestone-II upto 31-10-2015.

Four Laning (Project Completion)

910th day from the Appointed Date

16-06-2014 Four Lane completion in accordance with Concession Agreement

Concessionaire has not achieved Four Laning (Project completion) by scheduled date. Concessionaire has submitted request for Extension of Time (EOT) for Four - Laning upto November 2016. Executive Committee of NHAI has given approval for Extension of Time (EOT) upto 31-03-2016 (except eco-sensitive zone).

Very Slow Progress of Works:

(a) In spite of prevailing good working season, absolutely no work is in progress in both sections.

It appears that the works are held up for want of fund cement, bitumen, diesel, manpower,

machinery, and other resources. The physical progress during August ’14 to February ‘15 are

0.01%, 0.04%, 0.03%, 0.02%, 0.0%, 0.00% and 0.02% respectively. The length of highway

works completed(m) during these months are given below:

Description Aug.’ 14 Sept. ’14 Oct. ’14 Nov. ’14 Dec. ’14 Jan.’15 Feb. ‘15

Clearing & Grubbing 0 0 0 0 0 310 0

Embankment 0 0 0 0 0 350 160

Subgrade 0 0 0 288 0 260 240

Granular Sub base (GSB) 0 0 0 30 0 70 250

Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM)

0 0 60 0 0 0 0

Bituminous Concrete (BC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(b) It has also been observed that at following underpass locations works can start/continue:

Sl No Chainage Description Concessionaire’s Comments Our Comments

1 25+860

Khopoli VUP

Panvel

approach

CIDCO pipeline is the major

hurdle: CIDCO pipeline on LHS is

not yet removed by the

authority. There is still land

acquisition problem which is not

sorted out in totally.

CIDCO pipeline will not

affect approach

construction. There is

absolutely no problem

to construct the

approaches.

2 30+930 Wadkhal

VUP Indapur

Land problem and the continuous

stretch of land is not available for

There is no problem in

constructing the


(c) The works for Rest area, busbays, truck laybyes etc. are not yet started.

(d) Independent Engineer’s review on the progress of work on highway alongwith land availability

shows that at following locations, highway works should have been in progress.

Sl No

Chainage Side

Length (Km)

Remarks From To

1 0+400 1+000 B/S 600 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 2 1+500 4+300 B/S 2,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 3 5+500 6+800 B/S 1,300 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 4 21+300 23+500 RHS 2,200 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 5 22+950 23+350 LHS 400 Slow Progress 6 31+000 31+600 B/S 600 Work yet to be started 7 40+100 41+900 B/S 1,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 8 51+500 51+900 LHS 400 WMM work still not completed 9 59+400 60+300 LHS 900 No work 10 59+700 59+900 RHS 200 Earthwork is not completed 11 60+800 61+700 LHS 900 No work 12 62+400 63+100 LHS 700 No work 13 63+900 65+900 LHS 2,000 Work is slow progress 14 70+000 72+300 LHS 2,300 No work 15 74+800 76+200 RHS 1,400 Work is slow progress 16 76+550 76+850 LHS 300 No work 17 77+000 77+700 RHS 700 No work 18 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work

approach construction activity. approaches.

3 49+280

Koleti PUP

approaches

both ends

Award passed, no payment made

to land owners. Land problem to

be dealt by NHAI.

Service road can be

constructed on LHS and

accordingly approaches

can be constructed.

4 50+845

Palas PUP

approaches

on both ends

Verification of land required from

Dy. SLR for confirmation of

encroachment of private land.

The Vaishali Hotel owner

allowing any construction

activity.


constructing service

road on LHS and thus

constructing the

approaches.

5 54+450 Nagothane

VUP

Govt. land/court matter & the

embankment toe is going

Railway land (ROW) on LHS.

Matter needs to be sorted for

starting the construction activity.

There is no problem for

constructing RHS

service road and the

approaches.

6 68+320 Khmab PUP

Still there are 9 structures on site

which not in vacant position,

continuous stretch of land is not

RE wall.

Concessionaire should

proactively support for

encroachment removal

if any.

7 79+140 Ratwad PUP

No payment made to land

owners. Land owners are not

allowing for work, land problem

to be solved by NHAI.


constructing the

approaches.


Sl No

Chainage Side

Length (Km)

Remarks From To

19 81+200 82+400 RHS 1,200 GSB work is not completed 20 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work

Total 22,900

The above details show that in spite of sufficient work fronts available the Concessionaire could

not achieve better progress due to lack of various resources such as fund, machinery, diesel,

manpower etc.

Non - Maintenance of The Project Highway : It has been observed that at many locations

(most of them are in new carriageway) many Potholes/Patchwork are not yet repaired in spite

of continuous follow up with Concessionaire. Non-maintenance of the highway is leading to lot

of criticism by the road users, administration and print media. Non-maintenance of the highway

will have to be considered as default of obligations by the Concessionaire as per the terms of

Concession Agreement. Detailed list of such maintenance issues were informed to the

Concessionaire.

Many Pending Designs and Drawings: Many design and drawings for highway and

structures are still pending with Concessionaire. An updated list was issued to

Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2806 dt. 04-12-’14. In spite of several

reminders no action is taken by Concessionaire for last nine months.

Non - Closure Of NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports, Audit Reports: Concessionaire

has not closed out many NCR’s Site Inspection Reports / Audit Reports in spite of several

reminders. Non-closure of such NCR’s/Site Inspection Report/Audit Reports/ letters on

quality issues etc. is of major quality concern and will lead to contractual complications.

Insufficient Resources: Concessionaire has not mobilised sufficient resources such as

fund manpower, machinery, plant etc. Resources mobilised are very less. Construction

works were held up many times for want of fund, cement, bitumen, diesel, manpower,

machinery and other resources etc.

Crusher Production in Section - II : It has been observed that crusher production in

Section - II is very less and will not cater for requirement and this has been reported to

Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2773 dt. 21-11-’14. Most of the time,

the crusher is break down.

Status of ROB Approvals: The following is the status of approval of ROB’s:

Sl No

Chainage (Km)

Location Status

1 16+062 Kharpada

(1) GAD (General Arrangement Drawing) - Approved by

Railways.

(2) SAD (Structure Arrangement Drawing) - Done

(3) TAD (Temporary Arrangement Drawing) - Done

(4) CRS (Commissioner Railway Safety) - Sanction Obtained

(5) P & E charges deposited by NHAI


Sl No

Chainage (Km)

Location Status

(6) Codal charges not paid by Concessionaire.

(7) MoU executed.

2 28+283 Pen


Railways.






(7) MoU executed.

3 33+877 Wadkhal Bypass


Railways.

(2) SAD (Structure Arrangement Drawing) - Not Submitted

(3) TAD (Temporary Arrangement Drawing) - Not Submitted

to Railways

(4) CRS (Commissioner Railway Safety) - Sanction not

Obtained

(5) Codal charges not paid by Concessionaire

(6) MoU executed.

Details of Utility Shifting:

Sl No

Description Total Length

(m) Status

A CIDCO Water Pipe Lines 5080 m In-principle approval given for shifting. Shifting works already started. This is affecting 2.0 Km length of main carriageway.

B Reliance / NOCIL Gas Pipeline 690 m

The exact location of pipeline identified. Concessionaire has to submit proposal by modifying the piers P11 (L), P12 (L), P13 (L) and P15 (R). The abutment A1 may be converted to pier and retaining wall type. The 4” pipe which comes in embankment portion may be encased by utility owner.

C

MSEDCL Electrical Lines & Poles (17 DTC Transformers, 665 HT Poles, 841 LT Poles, 96 HT Crossings, 138 LT Crossings and 3 river crossings)

4,850m LHS

21,050m RHS

Very slow progress. Out of total 237 crossings, only 3 nos. crossings done so far.

D MJP Water Pipeline (200 to 450 mm Ø Water line)

19,840m LHS

4,180m RHS

Shifting works in very slow progress. Pipe laid for 7 Km only out of total length of 23.5 Km. The MJP officials have many times shown their protest against such slow progress by the Concessionaire.

E ISPAT Water Pipeline 21,670m LHS

70m RHS

Shifting works in progress. 4.1 Km length shifting completed.

F ZP water pipeline 5,090m LHS

4,030m RHS Slow progress in shifting.


1.0 THE PROJECT

1.1 Project Background

The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) has decided to take up the

development of various National Highways Stretches / Corridors under the National

Highways Development Programme (NHDP). NHAI had accordingly invited proposals by

its Notice Request for Qualification No. NHAI/NHDP-III/MAHA/BOT/PI dated 29-01-

2010 (the "Request for Qualification" or "RFQ") for short listing of bidders for

construction, operation and maintenance of the of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) on DBFOT

basis and had shortlisted certain bidders including, the consortium comprising M/s

Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd., M/s China State Construction Engineering (Hong

Kong) Ltd. and M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructures Private Ltd. with M/s Supreme

Infrastructure India Ltd. as its Lead Member. Further, NHAI had accepted the bid of

the Consortium and issued its Letter of Award No. NHAI/BOT-I/11012/62/2005/14902

dated 28-10-2010 to the Consortium. On 21-01-2011, NHAI entered into agreement

with Consortium “Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited (SPITPL)” as

Concessionaire, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,

1956 and having its registered office at Supreme City, Hiranandani Complex, Powai,

Mumbai - 400076, Maharashtra, India, for execution of the Project on DBFOT basis.

Thus, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has entrusted the work of design,

construction, development, finance, operation and maintenance of Four-Laning of the

Panvel - Indapur section of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) sin the state of Maharashtra

under NHDP phase - III on DBFOT basis (Package No : NHDP-III/DL4/05) to the

Concessionaire M/s Supreme Panvel-Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (SPITPL).

Concessionaire has deployed two EPC Contractors for the construction of the Project.

M/s Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd. in association with M/s Feedback Infra Private

Limited has been appointed as the Independent Engineer [IE] for the Project.

The Project is having 84.6 Km length, located in the state of Maharashtra passing along

and adjacent to the Arabian Sea coast. The Project basically constitute upgradation

involving construction of 4-lanes highway including bridges, widening and rehabilitation

of existing bridges and culverts, elevated structures, ROB’s, wayside amenities,

realignment, bypasses etc. The Project forms part of the National Highway

Development Project (NHDP Phase-III) Programme.

1.2 Project Location The Panvel - Indapur section of NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) is located in the district of

Raigarh, which in turn is located in the State of Maharashtra. The State lies in the

western part of the Indian peninsula and is surrounded by the States of Gujarat,

Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.


Maharashtra has an area of 307,690 sq. km with a population of 96,752,247 and

Mumbai is the state capital. The population density per sq. km is 314.44. It has a

literacy rate of 77.3 %, the second highest in the country, against the average Indian

scenario of 65.4 %. More than 900 educational institutions provide 1,69,000 technical

manpower each year and 30% share of new patents, setting the pace for innovation in

India. There are in all 35 districts in Maharashtra. Raigarh district is situated in the

western part of Maharashtra. Raigarh district is surrounded by Thane district in the

north; Pune district in the east; Ratnagiri district in the south; and the Arabian Sea in

the west. According to 2001 census, the population of Raigarh was 2,205,972 with

population density of 309 persons per Sq Km. The district, being a part of Konkan

region receives heavy rainfall during the monsoon.

The National Highway No-17 (Presently, NH-66) is on the west coast linking Panvel

(Maharashtra) and Cochin (Kerala). This section of the National Highway is heavily

trafficked by both passenger vehicles and freight transport vehicles. To meet the need

for road safety and development of the area, Government of India through the

National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is implementing the Project of

strengthening and widening of the existing two-lane roadway to a four-lane dual

carriageway. Apart from the four laning, flyovers, vehicular underpasses, pedestrian

underpasses, service roads, highway traffic management systems and other road

safety measures will be provided in these sections. The concession period is 21 years

including construction period of 910 days (approximately 2.5 years). The

implementation of the Project will reduce the time and cost of travel for traffic plying

between Panvel and Indapur in the Raigarh district of Maharashtra State. It will also

add to the development of tourism in the State.

NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) mainly traverses through the west coast of India, sometimes

touching shores of Arabian Sea. This highway touches the Arabian Sea

at Maravanthe in Karnataka and Thalassery in Kerala. It passes through the States of

Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka and Kerala.

NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) start from the junction with NH-4B near Panvel connecting

Indapur, Mahad, Rajapur, Kudal in Maharashtra, Panaji and Margoa in Goa, Karwar,

Honavar, Udupi, Mangalore in Karnataka, Kasaragod, Kannur, Ponnani, Edappalli etc.

NH-17 (Presently, NH-66) allows for movement of goods by trucks from hinterland to

major sea ports of India. The trade and commerce in the region has increased due to

expansion of markets for agricultural and sea food produced in the region connected

by this highway.

The Project stretch runs in plain and short stretch of hilly terrain. The Project includes

6 nos. Major Bridges, 23 nos. Minor Bridges, 2 nos. Flyovers, 3 nos. ROB’s, 11 nos

Vehicular Underpasses, 15 nos. Pedestrian / Cattle Underpasses, 136 nos. Box/Slab

Culverts, 228 Pipe Culverts and 2 nos. Toll Plaza’s. The length of service road on LHS is

19.79 Km at on RHS is 17.76 Km totalling to 37.55 Km. and mostly located at urban

areas of the Project highway. The Panvel - Indapur section passes through the towns

of Pen, Vadkhal, Nagothane, Kolad and ends at Km 84 before Indapur town.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_sea

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maravanthe


1.3 Terrain and Alignment

The Project passes primarily through plain & rolling terrain except for the two small

Ghat sections (Km 8 to 9 & Km 64 to 66) where the terrain can be classified as hilly.

The alignment is single carriageway comprising two lanes with width ranging from 7 m

to 10 m and earthen shoulder on either side. The alignment is generally straight with

reasonably large radii curves that are generally appropriate for high speeds except for

some sharp curves in the Karnala Bird Sanctuary portion and Sukheli Khind ghat

section. In these hilly stretches the alignment follows a winding path and several sharp

curves with limited sight distance are present. These curves need to be redesigned to

the extent possible within the available ROW and the overall visibility improved. In the

plain / rolling stretch the highway is not having any major cutting and filling whereas in

the Ghat areas some sections involve large to deep cuts. About 80 % of the Project

Highway runs on an embankment of 1.0 to 2.0 m height. However, significant

variations in heights of embankment are observed at low-lying fields and also at bridge

approaches.

The highway passes through rural agricultural areas and villages, such as Pen (Km

26+600 to 30+000), Wadkhal (Km 32+000 to 34+600), Nagothane (Km 53+000 to

56+200) and Kolad (Km 71+500 to 74+000). The adjoining land use is predominantly

barren with patches of agricultural land, forest and built-up locations. The highway

passes through several towns and many villages some of which have settlements in

close proximity of the highway.

The existing highway has a single two-lane carriageway with pavement width varying

from 10 m to 11.0 m and 1.0 m wide soft shoulder on either side till Km 33. Beyond

this, the width is 7.0 m with soft shoulders of 1.5 to 2.0 m, till the end of the Project.

The highway is on an embankment for most of the length except in Ghat areas from

Km 8 to 9 and Km 64 to 66 where it lies in cutting. The embankment height in general

varies between 1.0 to 5.0 m but there are several locations where it is less than 1m.

However, there is no history of submergence or overtopping of the pavement at these

locations. The depth of cutting in Ghat Sections varies between 1.0 to 10.0 m. The

pavement condition is found to be fair to good for the almost the entire length except

for the stretch from Km 20 to 25 and Km 40 to 42 where substantial raveling and

rutting is observed. The riding quality as such also varies from fair to quite good. Most

of these stretches have been overlaid recently by the Department.

No organised drainage system exists along the Project Highway. However, the highway

level is sufficiently raised and earthen drains have been constructed to drain the

surface water to the nearby culverts. At some locations, lined drains have also been

constructed adjacent to the shoulders. Local enquiries reveal that there is no history of

overtopping of the road at any location.

1.4 Salient Features

Contract data is given in Table 1.1. Salient features are given in Table 1.2.


Table 1.1 Contract Data

Description Details

Name of Project

Design, Construction, Development, Finance, Operation and Maintenance of Four-Laning of Panvel-Indapur section of NH-17 from Km. 0+000 to 84+000 in the State of Maharashtra under NHDP Phase-III on DBFOT Basis.

Package No. NHDP-III/DL4/05

Source of Funding DBFOT Basis

Client/Employer National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), G-5 & 6, Sector 10, Dwaraka, New Delhi. PIN: 110 075

Concessionaire Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited, 9th Floor, (901-905), Millennium Tower B, Opp. IFFCO Chowk, Metro Station, M.G. Road, Gurgaon-122 002, Haryana-India.

Independent Engineer

Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd.

24, Dunchon-daero 388 beon-gil, Joongwon-Gu, Seongnam-

Si, Gyeonggi-Do (Sangdaewon-Dong, Woolim Lions Valley

3rd 12F), 462-819, KOREA

in association with

M/s Feedback Infra Private Limited.

15th Floor, Tower 9B, DLF Cyber City Phase-III, Gurgaon.

PIN : 122 002

Project Management Consultants

M/s Sowil Limited

EPC Contractors

Ch. 0+000 to 42+000: M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, 5, Basement, Vasant Industrial Estate, Saki-Vihar Road, Sakinaka, Andheri (E), Mumbai.

Ch. 42+000 to 84+000: M/s Supreme Infrastructure India Limited, Supreme House, 94/C, Pratap Gad, Opp. IIT Main Gate, Powai, Mumbai - 400 076

Date Concession Agreement signed

21-01-2011

Development Period 21-01-2011 to 18-12-2011

Appointed Date 19-12-2011

Concession Period 21 years (19-12-2011 to 18-12-2032)

Letter of Acceptance NHAI/BOT-1/11012/62/2005/14902

Scheduled Construction Completion Date

16-06-2014 (910 days construction period)

Project Cost as per (Concession Agreement)

942.69 Rs. Crores

Project Cost (As Reported by Concessionaire)

1205.72 Rs. Crores

Annual Premium 33.95 Rs. Crores


Table 1.2 Salient Features

Description Length/ Nos.

Length of the project 84 Km

Major Bridges 6 Nos.

Minor Bridges 23 Nos.

Slab/Box culverts 135+1 Locations

Pipe culverts 208+20 Locations

Flyovers 2 Nos.

ROB’s 3 Nos

Pedestrian Underpasses

15 nos.

[14 as per CA + 2 additional as per CA + 1 additional as per COS - 2 converted to VUP as

per COS]

Vehicular Underpasses

11 nos.

[7 as per CA + 2 additional as per CA + 2 converted to VUP as per COS]

Major Intersections 12 Nos.

Minor Intersections 94 Nos.

Main Line Toll Plaza 2 Nos (Design Chainage 15+000 & 66+775)

Busbays 52 Nos

Truck Layby 4 Nos (Design Chainage 3+145 LHS, 5+654 RHS, 62+749 LHS and 63+513 RHS)

Rest Area 1 No. (Design Chainage 60+300 RHS)


Table 1.3 Details of Major Bridges

Sl. No.

CA Chainage

(Km)

Design Chainage

(Km)

Name of the River

Details of Existing Structures Details of the Proposed Structures

Type of Superstructu

re

No. of Spans x Span Length (m)

Width of bridge

(m) Remarks

Total Length

(m)

Width (m)

Remarks

1 15+480 15+878 Kharpada

RCC Girder (2 span x 27.0 ) +

10.90 To be retained with repair and rehabilitation.

12.00 (2 lane)

New Construction on

LHS side. Span over railway line to be finalised in consultation with railway authority.

PSC Girder (5 spans x 42.50 ) +

RCC Girder (10 spans x 27.80 ) +

RCC Girder (1 span x 14.41 ) + 817.755

PSC Girder (1 span x 38.20 ) +

RCC Girder (1 span x 21.987 ) +

RCC Girder (7 spans x 27.80 )

2 20+097 20+144 Balganga RCC Girder & deck slab

(1 span x 16.50 ) + (2 span x 21.50 ) + ( 1 span x 16.50 )

8.450 To be retained with repair and rehabilitation

76 12.00

(2 lane) New Construction on RHS side.

3 26+152 26+188 Bhogeshwari MS I - Girder & RCC Deck

(10 spans x 12.80 ) 7.850 Dismantling and reconstruction

128 2 x 12.00 (4 lane)

New Construction

4 44+119 44+155 Nigade RCC Girder &

deck slab

(1 span x 12.60 ) + (1 span x 12.20 ) + (1 span x 17.00 ) +

(3 spans x 19.50 ) + (1 span x 12.20 ) + (1 span x 12.60 )

8.100 To be retained with Repair and rehabilitation

125.1 12.00

(2 lane)

New Construction on

RHS side.

5 58+857 58+857 Amba CR Masonry arch deck

(9 spans x 10.65 ) 6.900 Existing bridge to be abandoned.

95.85 2 x 12.00 (4 lane)

New Construction.

6 72+876 72+936 Kundalika CR Masonry arch deck

(12 spans x 10.50 ) 6.70 To be retained with Widening.

126 12.00



Table 1.4 Details of Minor Bridges

Sl No

CA

Chainage (km)

Design Chainage

(Km)

Name of River

Details of Existing Structure Proposed Structure

Type of Superstructure

No. of Spans x Span Length

(m) Width (m) Remarks

Total Length

(m)

Width Of Bridge

(m) Remarks

1 0+544 0+544 Local Nallah RC Beam & Deck slab 3 spans x 6.70 12.90 Repair, Widening on both side.

20.10 27.50

(4 lane) Concentric widening of existing bridge.

2 9+363 9+363 Local Nallah RCC Solid Slab (40 skew )

2 spans x 7.10 11.10 Dismantling and New Construction.

18.00 25.00

(4 lane) New Construction.

3 20+780 20+754

RCC Solid Slab 4 spans x 6.80 13.00 Repair and rehabilitation. 27.20 12.00

(2 lane) New Construction on LHS side.

4 29+728 29+728 Vashi Nallah RCC Solid Slab 3 spans x 7.10 12.60 Repair and rehabilitation. 21.30 12.00


5 30+557 30+557 Uchede Nallah

RCC Solid Slab (250 skew )

2 spans x 6.10 12.40 Widening with Repair and rehabilitation.

12.20 27.50


6 52+089 52+155 Nidi RCC Solid Slab (16.30 skew )

4 spans x 8.80 12.05 Repair and rehabilitation. 35.20 12.00


7 57+926 57+997 Patansai

CR Masonry arch extended by RCC

solid slab on both side


(2 lane)

New Construction on

RHS side.

8 59+335 59+396 Canal Crossing

RCC Solid Slab 1 span x 10.70 8.50 Widening with repair and rehabilitation.

10.70 12.00 (2

lane) New Construction on RHS side.

9 59+797 59+848 Godsai CR Masonry arch extended by RCC solid slab



10 62+285 62+133 Local Nallah RCC Solid Slab 2 spans x 4.60 13.00 Repair and rehabilitation. 9.20 12.00



CR Masonry arch extended by RCC solid slab on both sides




RCC Solid Slab 2 spans x 7.25 8.30 Widening with repair and rehabilitation.

14.50 12.00



Sl No

CA

Chainage (km)

Design Chainage

(Km)

Name of River

Details of Existing Structure Proposed Structure


No. of Spans x Span Length

(m) Width (m) Remarks

Total Length

(m)

Width Of Bridge

(m) Remarks

13 66+683 66+742 Nandavali RCC solid slab 2 spans x 4.70 12.10 Repair and rehabilitation. 9.40 12.00


14 67+043 67+099 Local Nallah RCC solid slab 2 spans x 4.60 12.05 Repair and rehabilitation. 9.20 12.00


15 67+820 67+878 Irrigation Canal

RCC Solid Slab (510 skew )

(1 span x 9.95) + (1 span x

8.95) 7.70

Widening with repair and rehabilitation.

18.90 27.50


16 68+927 68+988 Local Nallah

CR Masonry arch extended by RCC solid slab on both sides



17 69+081 69+140 Local Nallah RCC solid slab widened on both side



18 72+196 72+250 Mahisdara Nallah

RCC I Girder (180 skew )



19 73+290 73+350 Godi Masonry arch & RCC cantilever slab

(1 span x 7.70) + (3 spans x

7.00) + (1 span x 7.70)

13.65 Repair and rehabilitation. 36.40 12.00


20 77+744 77+804 Bhuvan Nallah

CR Masonry arch

extended by RCC solid slab on both side



21 81+606 81+660 Vave Nallah RCC Solid Slab 3 spans x 7.45 12.20 Repair and rehabilitation. 22.35 12.00



RCC Solid Slab 1 span x 6.40 8.15 Widening with repair and rehabilitation.

6.40 12.00


23 84+431 84+488 Indapur RCC Solid Slab 3 spans x 10.45 11.95 Repair and rehabilitation. 31.35 12.00



Table 1.5 Details of Flyovers

Sl No

CA

Chainage (Km)

Design Chainage

(Km Name of structure

Details Of Existing Structure Details Of Proposed Structure

Total Span Length

Width (m)

Remarks Total

Length (m)

Width (m) Remarks

1 0+250 0+250 Palaspe Junction Not Applicable 390 12.00

(2 lane) Proposed to be deleted

2 33+670 33+670 Wadkhal Bypass Not Applicable 1092 2 x 12.00 (4 lane)

Span over railway line to be decided in consultation with railway authorities.

Table 1.6 Details of ROB’s

Sl No

CA Chainage

(Km)

Design Chainage

(Km

Name of structure

Details Of Existing Structure Details of proposed structures


Spans x Length

Width

(m) Remarks

Total Length

(m) Width Remarks

1 15+480 16+062 Kharpada PSC Girder and RCC deck slab

1 Span x 38.20 m


38.20 12.00 m (2 lane)

New Construction on LHS side.

2 28+283 28+283 Pen

MS Built-up ' I '

girder and RCC deck slab

2 Spans x 13.50 m


27.00 12.00 m (2 lane)

New Construction on LHS side.

3 33+670 33+877 Wadkhal Bypass

- - -

28.00 2 x 12.0 m

(4 lanes) New Construction

Table 1.7 Details of RUB’s

Sl

No

CA Chainage

(Km)

Design Chainage

(Km

Details of Existing Structure

Name of Structure


No. X size of Openings

Remarks

1 33+860 33+877 Wadkhal Steel girders 1 X 24 Abandoned since bypass is proposed - Due to Wadkhal bypass not applicable

2 56+560 56+560 Nagothane Steel girders 1 X 24 Widening not required as opening size is sufficient to accommodate 4 lane highway.

3 73+250 73+250 Kolad PSC girder and RCC deck slab

3 X 26 Widening not required as opening size is sufficient to accommodate 4 lane highway.


Table 1.8 Details of Service Road (LHS) - As per Concession Agreement

Sl No

From (Km) To (Km) Length (Km)

Location

1 0+950 2+260 1.31 Palaspe

2 4+650 5+380 0.73 Chinchwan

3 13+440 14+210 0.77 Tara

4 17+950 18+970 1.02 Jite

5 25+340 26+060 0.72 Pen

6 26+370 28+000 1.63 Pen

7 28+460 29+590 1.13 Pen

8 29+950 30+480 0.54 Uchede

9 31+300 31+680 0.38 Wadkhal

10 37+080 37+800 0.72 Gadab

11 41+350 42+860 1.51 Kasu, Pandapur, Patni

12 44+710 45+810 1.10 Nigade

13 49+000 49+500 0.50 Koleti

14 55+090 56+590 1.50 Nagothane

15 67+910 68+830 0.92 Khamb

16 73+400 75+450 2.05 Kolad

17 75+940 76+500 0.56 Talavali

Total 17.09

Table 1.9 Details of Service Road (RHS) - As per Concession Agreement

Sl No

From (Km) To (Km) Length (Km)

Location

1 0+920 2+260 1.34 Palaspe

2 4+650 5+380 0.73 Chinchwan

3 13+430 14+210 0.78 Tara

4 17+950 18+970 1.02 Jite

5 26+760 28+000 1.24 Pen

6 28+510 29+600 1.09 Pen

7 29+950 30+470 0.52 Uchede

8 31+300 31+630 0.33 Wadkhal

9 34+100 34+640 0.53 Wadkhal

10 37+080 37+800 0.72 Gadab

11 44+570 45+600 1.03 Nigade

12 49+000 49+500 0.50 Koleti

13 54+840 56+530 1.69 Nagothane

14 67+920 68+830 0.91 Khams

15 73+400 75+450 2.05 Kolad

16 75+940 76+500 0.56 Talavali

Total 15.04

In addition to above, Concession Agreement has provision for providing additional length

of 5.40 Km Service Road. However, as per Concessionaire’s design the following are the

details of Service Road:


Table 1.10 Details of Service Road - LHS - As per Concessionaire’s Design

Sl No Location Chainage

Length (Km) Status From To

1 Palaspe 0+950 2+260 1.31 Concurred

2 Chinchwan 4+570 5+340 0.77 Concurred

3 Tara 13+470 14+400 0.93 Concurred

4 Jite 18+300 19+330 1.03 Concurred

5 Khopoli 25+330 26+050 0.72 Concurred

6 Pen 26+380 28+020 1.64 Concurred

7 Ramwadi 28+370 29+500 1.13 Concurred

8 Uchede 29+910 30+920 1.01 Concurred

9 Wadkhal 34+220 34+750 0.53 Not Submitted

10 Gadab 37+210 37+930 0.72 Concurred

11 Khapale 39+430 40+040 0.61 Not Submitted

12 Kasu 41+350 42+840 1.49 Concurred

13 Nigade 44+710 45+810 1.10 Concurred

14 Koleti 48+940 49+590 0.65 Concurred

15 Palas 50+490 51+220 0.73 Concurred

16 Nagothane 53+520 56+580 3.06 Concurred

17 Khamb 68+000 68+900 0.90 Concurred

18 Kolad 73+500 75+440 1.94 Concurred

19 Talavali 76+050 76+590 0.54 Concurred

Total (LHS) 20.81

Table 1.11 Details of Service Road - RHS - As per Concessionaire’s Design

Sl No

Location Chainage

Length (Km)

Status From To

1 Palaspe 0+920 2+260 1.34 Concurred

2 Chinchwan 4+570 5+340 0.77 Concurred

3 Tara 13+470 14+400 0.93 Concurreds

4 Jite 18+300 19+330 1.03 Concurred

5 Pen 26+780 28+020 1.24 Concurred

6 Ramwadi 28+370 29+460 1.09 Concurred

7 Uchede 29+900 30+940 1.04 Concurred

8 Wadkhal 34+300 34+750 0.45 Concurred

9 Gadab 37+210 37+930 0.72 Concurred

10 Nigade 44+570 45+600 1.03 Concurred

11 Koleti 48+940 49+590 0.65 Concurred

12 Palas 50+490 51+220 0.73 Concurred

13 Nagothane 53+520 56+530 3.01 Concurred

14 Khamb 68+000 68+900 0.90 Concurred

15 Kolad 73+500 75+455 1.95 Concurred

16 Talavali 76+050 76+590 0.54 Concurred

Total (RHS) 17.42


Table 1.12 Details of Vehicular Underpasses as per Concession Agreement

Sl

No

Chainage (Km) Opening Size (m)

Width

(m) Village

Anticipated Type As per CA As per Design

1 4+992 5+000 2 x 12 x 5.5 24.0 Chinchwan RCC Solid slab

2 25+873 25+860 2 x 12 x 5.5 12.0 Khopoli Junction RCC Solid slab

3 28+040 27+760 2 x 12 x 5.5 24.0 Pen RCC Solid slab

4 31+660 30+930 1x 12 x 5.5 24.0 Wadkhal Bypass RCC Solid slab

5 32+465 32+485 1 x 6 x 5.0 24.0 Wadkhal Bypass RCC Solid slab

6 55+968 56+060 2 x 12 x 5.5 24.0 Nagothane RCC Solid slab

7 73+699 73+760 2 x 12 x 5.5 24.0 Kolad RCC Solid slab

Table 1.13 Details of Pedestrian / Cattle Crossing Underpasses as per Concession Agreement

Table 1.14 Details of Busbays as of now

Sl

No

Chainage (Km) Opening Size (m)

Width

(m) Village Anticipated Type

As per CA As per Design

1 1+219 1+230 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Palaspe Box structure

2 13+796 13+788 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Tara Box structure

3 18+229 18+700 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Jite Box structure

4 27+136 27+100 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Pen Box structure

5 28+550 28+535 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Pen Box structure

6 30+276 30+270 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Uchede Box structure

7 37+453 37+529 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Gadab Box structure

8 42+075 42+155 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Kasu Box structure

9 45+149 45+225 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Nigade Box structure

10 49+280 49+280 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Koleti Box structure

11 55+749 55+840 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Nagothane Box structure

12 68+248 68+320 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Khamb Box structure

13 76+250 76+315 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Talavali Box structure

14 79+080 79+140 6.0 x 3.5 24.0 Ratvad Box structure

Sl No Chainage (Km)

Side Village As per CA As per Design

1 1+058 1+058 RHS Palaspe

2 1+140 1+140 LHS Palaspe

3 2+560 2+435 LHS Turmale

4 2+620 2+435 RHS Girwale

5 4+244 4+244 RHS Shirdon

6 4+415 4+244 LHS Shirdon

7 11+162 11+162 RHS Kolhe

8 11+406 11+406 LHS Kolhe

9 13+700 13+700 RHS Tara

10 13+902 13+902 LHS Tara


11 14+599 14+599 RHS Kasarbhat

12 14+568 14+568 LHS Kasarbhat

13 16+666 16+512 RHS Kasarbhat

14 16+725 16+512 LHS Kasarbhat

15 18+271 18+550 RHS Kharpada

16 18+349 18+870 LHS Kharpada

17 26+003 25+450 LHS Chinchghar

18 26+003 25+492 RHS Chinchghar

19 28+610 28+610 RHS Pen

20 28+659 28+659 LHS Pen

21 29+495 29+300 RHS Pen

22 29+495 29+300 LHS Pen

23 30+250 30+090 RHS Pen

24 30+250 30+096 LHS Pen

25 37+700 37+700 LHS Gadab

26 37+951 37+700 RHS Gadab

27 39+414 39+617 RHS Gadab

28 39+418 40+133 LHS Gadab

29 42+137 41+845 RHS Kasu

30 42+152 42+245 LHS Kasu

31 44+342 44+354 RHS Salinde

32 44+364 44+402 LHS Salinde

33 45+046 45+092 RHS Nigdi

34 45+064 45+142 LHS Nigdi

35 48+903 48+972 RHS Koleti

36 49+129 49+200 LHS Koleti

37 61+324 61+387 RHS Kansai

38 61+368 61+437 LHS Kansai

39 63+200 63+388 LHS Sukeli

40 68+145 68+315 RHS Kharwali

41 68+265 68+315 LHS Kharwali

42 70+392 70+392 RHS Pugaon

43 70+407 70+407 LHS Pugaon

44 75+320 75+060 LHS Kolad Railway station

45 76+126 76+200 RHS Talavali

46 76+137 76+200 LHS Talavali

47 78+439 78+107 RHS Bhuvan

48 78+468 78+107 LHS Bhuvan

49 79+600 79+707 RHS Ghotwal

50 79+600 79+707 LHS Ghotwal

51 82+570 82+462 RHS Nagroli

52 84+330 84+222 RHS Potner


Table 1.15 Details of Proposed Vehicular Underpasses as of now

Table 1.16 Details of Proposed Pedestrian / Cattle Crossing Underpasses as of now

Total number of Pipe Culverts: 208 + 20 Nos.

Total number of Slab Culverts: 135 + 1 Nos.

Table 1.17 Details of Proposed Bypass

Sl. No.

Village

As per Concession Agreement As per Approved Change of

Scope

Start Chainage

End Chainage

Length (Km)

Start Chainage

End Chainage

Length (Km)

1 Wadkhal 31+500 34+300 2.8 30+700 34+300 3.6

Sl No

Chainage (Km) Village Remarks As per

CA As per Design

1 4+992 5+000 Chinchwan VUP

2 23+460 23+460 Hamrapur VUP

3 25+873 25+873 Khopoli VUP- Half Portion

4 27+136 27+100 Pen PUP converted to VUP - approved in principle by NHAI

5 28+040 27+760 Pen VUP - Shifted to this Place - approved in principle by

NHAI

6 28+550 28+535 Pen/Ramwadi PUP converted to VUP - approved in principle by NHAI

7 31+660 30+930 Vadkhal VUP

8 32+465 32+485 Vadkhal VUP

9 - 54+450 Nagothane (SH-91) Additional VUP as per CA

10 55+968 56+060 Nagothane VUP

11 73+699 73+760 Roha/Kolad (SH-62) VUP

Sl No

Chainage (Km) Village Remarks


1 1+219 1+230 Palaspe

2 13+796 13+625 Tara

3 18+229 18+700 Jite

4 - 27+420 Pen Change of Scope approved in principle by NHAI

5 30+276 30+112 Uchede

6 37+453 37+529 Gadab

7 39+740 39+743 Khapale Additional PUP as per CA

8 42+075 42+155 Kasu

9 45+149 45+225 Nigade

10 49+280 49+280 Koleti

11 50+845 50+845 Palas Additional PUP as per CA

12 55+749 55+840 Nagothane

13 68+248 68+320 Khamb

14 76+250 76+315 Talavali

15 79+080 79+140 Ratwad


Table 1.18 Status of Design and Drawings of Major Junctions

Table 1.19 List of Minor Junctions.

Sl. No.

Chainage Km

Typ

e o

f

Cro

ssin

g

Destination

Details


Left Right

1 1+140 1+200 T - Palaspe MDR

2 1+220 1+230 T Palaspe - MDR

3 1+490 1+500 T - Palaspe VR

4 2+550 2+600 T - Turmale VR

5 2+630 2+650 T Giravale - VR

6 3+330 3+350 T - Sangivali VR

7 4+340 4+350 T Shirdhon - VR

8 4+990 5+000 T Shirdhon - MDR

9 NA 9+100

10 11+310 11+315 T - Kolhe VR

11 12+020 12+000 Y - Bandarwadi VR

12 13+800 13+800 T Tara - MDR

13 16+540 - Y Kharpada - VR

14 18+230 18+240 Y Jite - MDR

15 19+040 19+450 T Tharoshi - VR

16 20+220 20+200 Y Durshet - MDR

17 21+100 21+100 T Balivali - VR

18 21+690 21+680 T - Kopsar VR

19 22+450 22+455 Y Ambivali - VR

Sl No

Chainage (Km)

Typ

e o

f

Cro

ssin

g

Destination

Details As per

CA As per Design

Left Right

1 0+250 0+250 + Pune Uran Flyover-NH Crossing

2 14+730 14+730 T Aapta Phata - At Grade improvement (SH-83)

3 25+870 25+850 T Khopoli - Vehicular Underpass (left

carriageway only) SH-87

4 27+730 27+730 + Pen City Pen Railway

station At Grade

5 33+670 33+746 T Alibaug Flyover (SH-87)

6 35+800 35+890 Y - At-grade improvement-ISPAT

Factory

7 54+380 54+450 T - At-grade improvement (SH-91)

8 55+970 56+040 Y Nagothane Vehicular Underpass

9 58+660 58+750 T Pali - At-grade improvement (SH-92)

10 58+960 59+025 T Alibaug At-grade improvement (SH-93)

11 73+700 73+760 T Roha Vehicular Underpass (SH-62)

12 74+730 74+800 T Pune - At-grade improvement


Sl. No.

Chainage Km

Typ

e o

f

Cro

ssin

g

Destination

Details


Left Right

20 23+470 23+440 T - Paramanandwadi VR

21 24+210 24+220 T - Virwadi MDR

22 25+280 25+290 T Tarankhop - VR

23 25+440 25+600 T Tarankhop - VR

24 27+080 27+100

Y - Pen VR

25 27+140 Y Pen - MDR

26 27+300 27+300 T Pen - VR

27 28+550 28+535 + Village Ramwadi VR

28 29+120 29+100 + Kitwane colony Umbrade VR

29 29+660 29+700 Y - Vashi MDR

30 30+270 30+100 T - Uchade VR

31 30+670 30+650 T Kandlepada - VR

32 31+360 - T - Kandle VR

33 32+650 32+500 + Wadkhal Wadkhal VR

34 31+590 34+680 T - Dolvi VR

35 36+480 36+570 T Karave - MDR

36 37+150 37+200 T - Gadab VR

37 37+470 37+500 T - Gadab VR

38 39+670 39+750 T Gadab - VR

39 40+410 40+550 T - Devroli VR

40 40+730 40+900 T Jui - VR

41 41+390 41+400 T Karajtape - VR

42 41+650 41+700 T Salindeg - VR

43 42+080 42+155 T Kasu - VR

44 42+230 42+300 T Kasu - VR

45 42+430 42+500 T Patani - VR

46 42+680 42+500 T Pandapur - VR

47 43+150 43+240 T Aakadevi temple - MDR

48 44+000 44+090 + Salinde - VR

49 44+420 44+500 T - Nigade VR

50 44+740 44+820 T - Palkar MDR

51 44+920 45+000 T - Amtem VR

52 45+150 45+200 T - Amtem VR

53 45+250 45+300 T - Amtem VR

54 46+360 46+400 + Amtem Amtem VR

55 47+380 47+450 T Khartale - VR

56 48+510 48+600 T - Kolotichiwadi VR

57 49+020 49+100 + Village Kolotichiwadi VR

58 50+780 50+850 T Palas - VR

59 52+730 52+800 T Nidi - VR

60 53+080 53+100 T - Nidi VR

61 53+330 53+400 T Kond - VR

62 54+090 54+150 T Miranagar - VR


Sl. No.

Chainage Km

Typ

e o

f

Cro

ssin

g

Destination

Details


Left Right

63 54+920 55+000 T - Village VR

64 55+180 55+250 T Ramnagar - MDR

65 56+320 56+400 T Nagothane - MDR

66 56+940 57+050 T Chikani - VR

67 61+240 61+300 T MSEB (Kansui) - VR

68 61+880 61+940 T Tamsoli - VR

69 63+190 63+260 T - Sukeni VR

70 64+330 64+400 T Kherwadi - VR

71 68+180 68+260 T Khamb - VR

72 68+260 68+300 T - Khamb VR

73 68+350 68+400 T Khamb - VR

74 68+680 68+740 T - School MDR

75 69+740 69+800 T - Village VR

76 69+850 69+900 T Village - VR

77 70+830 70+890 T Village - VR

78 71+360 71+420 T - Village VR

79 71+730 71+800 T Village - VR

80 71+940 72+000 T Pugaon - VR

81 74+530 74+600 T - Waras VR

82 75+330 75+400 T Kolad Rly. Station - VR

83 76+260 76+300 T - Talawali VR

84 76+440 76+500 T Tise - VR

85 77+710 77+740 Y - Bhuvan MDR

86 78+320 78+400 T Ghotwal - MDR

87 79+090 79+140 + School Ratwade VR

88 79+490 79+490 Y - Village MDR

89 81+150 81+200 T Nilaj - VR

90 81+450 81+500 T - Wavediwali VR

91 81+680 81+700 Y - Wavediwali MDR

92 82+580 82+625 T - Potner VR

93 82+710 82+750 T Gangewadi - VR

94 83+220 82+300 T Rudroli - VR

95 84+330 84+400 T - Nagroli MDR

Table 1.20 Details of U-Turn Facilities

Sl

No Chainage Village name Type of Crossing

Distance between

Opening (m) Remarks

1 2+580 Turmale T Junction

2 5+000 Chinchwan VUP 2420

3 7+000 Mid block opening 2000

4 9+080 Karnala Kila T Junction 2080


Sl

No Chainage Village name Type of Crossing

Distance between

Opening (m) Remarks

5 11+995 Kolhe T Junction 2915

6 14+729 Apta Phata

(SH-83) T Junction 2734 No other cross road in between

7 17+560 Mid block opening 2831 Steep gradient in between

8 19+860 Mid block opening 2300 S-Curve in between

9 22+450 Ambivali T Junction 2590 Steep gradient & Curve portion

10 24+200 Virwadi T Junction 1750

11 25+860 Khopoli Jn (SH-87)

VUP 1660

12 27+100 VUP 1240 PUP converted to VUP - approved in principle by NHAI

13 27+760 VUP 660 VUP shifted to this place - approved in principle by NHAI

14 28+535 VUP 775 PUP converted to VUP - approved in principle by NHAI

15 29+660 Vashi T Junction 1125

16 30+930 Wadkhal VUP 1270


18 35+880 Ispat factory Y junction 2940


20 40+900 Jui T Junction 2310

21 43+200 Aakadevi Temple

T Junction 2300

22 46+450 Amate X Junction 3250

23 47+480 Khatale T Junction 1003

24 52+800 Nidi T Junction 5347 Many PUP’s in between

25 54+451 Nagothane

(SH-91) VUP (Additional) 1651

26 56+060 Nagothane VUP 1609

27 58+720 Pali T Junction 1120

28 59+021 Alibaug (SH-93) T Junction 301

29 60+300 Rest Area Mid block opening 1279

30 61+295 MSEB (Kansui) T Junction 995

31 63+244 Sukeli T Junction 1949

32 69+400 Mid block opening 6156 Hilly terrain 64 to 66, 66+700 toll plaza, 68+320 Khamb PUP

33 72+000 Pugaon T Junction 2600

34 73+760 Kolad (SH-62) VUP 1760

35 74+780 SH-60 VUP (Additional) 1020


37 78+388 Ghotwale T Junction 1488

38 81+825 Wavediwali T Junction 3112 No important cross road in between.

39 82+760 Gangewadi T Junction 1260

40 84+387 Nagroli T Junction 1627


1.5 Project Milestones

The Project Milestones details are given in Table 1.21

Table 1.21 Project Milestones


Date Progress

Requirements Status

Milestone-I

First anniversary of the Appointed Date

19-12-2012


Expended Cost : Not

less than 25% of total capital cost

Milestone - I was achieved on 01-05-’13. (That is during Extension of Time period). However, EOT is recently approved by the Executive Committee of NHAI.

Milestone-II

Second anniversary of

the Appointed Date

19-12-2013


Expended Cost : Not less than 65% of total capital cost

Concessionaire vide their letter no SPITPL/ P-NHAI/ 2003-14/ 2471 dt. 28-01-’14 informed NHAI that they have achieved Milestone-II considering the available land. Recently, Executive Committee of NHAI has given Extension of Time (EOT) for achievement of Milestone-II upto 31-10-2015.


910th day from the Appointed Date

16-06-2014 Four Lane completion in accordance with Concession Agreement

Concessionaire has not achieved Four Laning (Project completion) by scheduled date. Concessionaire has submitted request for Extension of Time (EOT) for Four - Laning upto November 2016. Executive Committee of NHAI has given approval for Extension of Time (EOT) upto 31-03-2016 (except eco-sensitive zone).

1.6 Location Map

Raigarh District Map is given in Figure 1.1. The road network map of Raigarh district is

shown in Figure 1.2.


Figure 1.1 District map of Raigarh

Figure 1.2 Road network in Raigarh District


Figure 1.3 Key plan


2.0 THE ESTABLISHMENT

2.1 Project Organisation

NHAI

NHAI have established a Project Implementation Unit at Panvel. The Project

Director is Mr. Prashant J. Fegade. He is supported by the Manager (Tech.) Mr.

Narayankar and other Administrative Staff.

Concessionaire

The Organization of Concessionaire’s is represented by its SPV Manager, Mr.

Pradeep Garole. He is responsible for day to day activities of the Concessionaire

and he also provides information to IE/NHAI as and when necessary.

Concessionaire has established their office near Km 27+800 at Pen.

Concessionaire’s Organisation chart is given in Figure 2.1.

Figure - 2.1 Concessionaire’s Organisation Chart

Concessionaire has appointed M/s Sowil Limited as Project Management

Consultants (PMC) and they have established their office at the same premises

that of the Concessionaire.

Independent Engineer

The Independent Engineer, Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd in Association with

Feedback Infra Private Limited. mobilised on 28-12-’11 and the Consultancy

Agreement was signed on 11-01-‘12. The team at site is headed by the Team

Leader cum Sr. Highway Engineer. All Key-Professionals are already mobilised.

Part Time / Intermittent staff is visiting site on as and when required basis apart

AGM (Planning):

Mr. Umapathi T B

G M (Finance):

Mr. Kamlesh Chechani

GM (Projects)

Vice President:

Mr. P.S. Garole

Acting Team Leader :

Gangadharan C.P.

Director:

Mr. Vikas Sharma


from reviewing Design, Drawings and Submittals from main / satellite offices. In

addition to above, Project Manager and Project Director at Head Office work as

link between site office and main office for co-ordinating issues beyond day to day

works. The Table 2.1 below shows the deployment of Independent Engineer.

Table 2.1 Deployment Details of Independent Engineer

Sl

No Position Name

Date of

Mobilisation

Date of De-

Mobilisation Remarks

A Key Professional Staff

1 Team Leader cum Sr.

Highway Engineer Mr. Gangadharan C P 30-12-‘11

2 Sr. Bridge Design Engineer

Mr. Magesh Santhanam 17-01-‘12 16-06-‘12

Mr. Nandadulal Dasgupta 07-02-‘13

3 Resident Cum Highway

Engineer Mr. Rajat Parkash Sharma 28-12-‘11

4 Highway Design

Engineer Mr. Dadan Singh 23-08-‘12 11-04-‘14

Manmonths

completed -

Demobilised

5 Bridge/Structural

Engineer Mr. H. Nagaraja Rao 02-02-‘12

6 Sr. Pavement Specialist Mr. Manish Kumar Shah 27-02-‘12

7 Sr. Quality cum Material

Expert Mr. M.V.K. Appa 16-01-‘12

8 Traffic and

Transportation Expert Mr. Krishna Prasad 12-04-‘12

9 Road Safety Expert Mr. Baljit Sidhu 05-09-‘12

10 Finance Expert Mr. Pankaj Sachdeva 13-06-‘12

11 Legal Expert Mr. Sunil Malhotra 21-08-'12

B Sub-Professional

Staff

12 Survey Engineer-1 Mr. Sena Prasad 05-04-‘13 21-04-‘14

Manmonths

completed -

Demobilised

13 Survey Engineer-2 Mr. Suresh Kumar 06-06-‘12

14 Asst. Highway Engr-1

Mr. Ravindra P Dongre 01-03-‘12

Mr. Neeraj Mahadeorao

Patil 28-02-‘14

15 Asst. Highway Engr-2 Mr. Arun Rajan Pillai 17-10`12

16 CAD Expert TBN -

17 Environmental Engineer Mr. Raj Kumar Singh 19-03-‘12

18 Asst. Bridge Engr-1 Mr. Shatrunjay Kumar 09-03-‘12

19 Asst. Bridge Engr-2 Mr. Vinod S Bawankar 19-04-‘12


20 Asst. Quality cum

Materials Engr-1 Mr. Raffiudin N Badure 05-04-‘12

21 Asst. Quality cum

Materials Engr-2 Mr. Sanjay Maharana 07-08-'12

22 Electrical Engineer Mr. Anand Mohan

Jayaswal 05-06-‘12

23 HTMS / Toll Expert TBN -

24 Quantity Surveyor Mr. Satish. N.L 22-10-‘12

25 Horticulture cum

Landscaping Expert TBN -

C Support Staff

26 Office Manager Mr. Praveen Kumar 01-02-‘12

27 Accountant Ms. Vidya Baburao Ubale 01-03-12 01-08-‘12

Ms. Madhumati P Kumar 22-08-‘12

28 Cashier Ms. Shubhangi Mohre 13-02-‘12 01-07-‘12

Ms. Reshma Newalkar 01-07-‘12

29 Photocopy Machine

Operator Mr. Santosh Sharma 22-02-‘12

30 Steno Ms. Jyoti Vishnu Jadhav 23-02-‘12

31 Computer Operator Ms. Reshma Ananda

Katekar 23-02-‘12 31-01-‘15

32 Guard-1 Mr. RamCharan Vajpayee 26-03-‘12

33 Guard-2 Mr. Ganesh Bhadur 26-03-‘12

34 Office Boy Mr. Mohammed Rafiq 17-01-’12 16-07-‘12

Mr. Aditya Shetye 16-07-‘12

The office of the Independent Engineer (IE) is located at First Floor, Tejaswini

Arcade, Above PMC Bank, Takka village, Old Panvel. PIN: 410 206. The office

contact numbers are: Telephone: 022-27450391, E-Mail Id: [email protected].

Independent Engineer’s Organisation Chart is given in Figure 2.2.


Figure 2.2. Independent Engineer’s Organisation Chart

Resident cum Highway Engineer:

Mr. Rajat Parkash Sharma

Team Leader/ Sr. Highway Engineer:

Mr. Gangadharan C.P.

Sr. Quality cum Material Expert:

Mr. M V K Appa

AHE - 1: Mr. Neeraj Mahadeorao Patil

AHE - 2: Mr. Arun Rajan Pillai

Survey Engr. - 1: (Demobilised)

ABE -1: Mr. Shatrunjay Kumar

ABE -2: Mr. Vinod S Bawankar

Survey Engr.-2: Mr. Suresh Kumar

AQME -1: Mr. Raffiudin N Badure

AQME -2: Mr. Sanjay Maharana

Bridge /Structural Engineer:

Mr. Nagaraja Rao

Short Term Key Professionals:

Sr. Pavement Specialist: Mr. Manish Kumar Shah

Sr. Bridge Design Engineer: Mr. Nandadulal Dasgupta

Traffic & Transportation Expert: Mr. Krishna Prasad

Road Safety Expert: Mr. Baljit Sidhu

Highway Design Engineer: (Demobilised)

Financial Expert: Mr. Pankaj Sachdeva

Legal Expert: Mr. Sunil Malhotra

Support Staff:

Office Manager: Mr. Praveen Kumar

Accountant: Ms. Madhumati P Kumar

Cashier: Ms. Reshma Newalkar

Steno: Ms. Jyoti Vishnu Jadhav

Computer Operator:

Photocopy Machine Operator: Mr. Santhosh Sharma

Office Boy: Mr. Aditya Shetye

Guard-1: Mr. Ram Charan Vajpayee

Guard-2: Mr. Ganesh Bhadur

Short Term Sub-Professionals:

Quantity Surveyor: Mr. Satish. N.L HTMS / Toll Expert: TBN

Electrical Engineer: Mr. Anand M Jayaswal

Horticulture cum Landscaping Expert: TBN

CAD Expert: TBN Environmental Engineer: Mr. Raj Kumar

Singh


EPC Contractors

Two EPC Contractors were appointed by the Concessionaire for the

construction of the Project. Details of EPC Contractors are given Table 2.2:

Table 2.2 Details of EPC Contractors

2.2 Plant & Machinery

Table 2.3 Details of Plants Mobilised

Sl No Description Location Capacity

Section-I

1 Laboratory 23+600

2 Stone Crusher Bombay Pada 200 TPH

3 Concrete Batching Plant 23+600 60 Cum /Hr

4 WMM Plant 23+600 200 TPH

5 Hot Mix Plant Bombay Pada 120 TPH

Section-II

6 Laboratory 58+000

7 Stone Crusher 58+000 200 TPH

8 Concrete Batching Plant 58+000 30 Cum /Hr

9 WMM Plant 58+000 200 TPH

10 Hot Mix Plant 58+000 160 TPH

Table 2.4 Details of Machinery

Sl No Description Available

(Nos) Photo

1 JCB 5

Sl No Location EPC Contractor

1 Km 0+000 to 42+000 M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

2 Km 42+000 to 84+000 M/s Supreme Infrastructure India Limited



(Nos) Photo

2 Excavator /

Poclain 7

3 Paver 1

4 Grader 2

6 Tippers 15



(Nos) Photo

7 Water Tanker 2

8 Vibratory

Roller 2

9 Transit Mixer 5

10 Plate

Compactors Nil

11 Hydra 2

13 Tandem Roller Nil

14 Pneumatic Tyred Rollers

(PTR)

Nil

15

Emulsion

Sprayer / Browser

1

Concessionaire has demobilised some of the Pavers, Graders, Pneumatic Tyred

Rollers, and Tipper etc. The present set of machinery is insufficient to complete the

project in time.


3.0 PROGRESS OF WORKS

3.1 Land Handing Over

Concession Agreement Vol-I, Clause 10.3 specify that on or prior to the Appointed

Date (that is 19-12-2011), NHAI shall have granted vacant access and Right of Way

such that the Appendix shall not include more than 20% of the total area of the Site

required and necessary for the Four-Laning of Project Highway. Also, NHAI shall

make best efforts to procure and grant, no later than 90 days from Appointed Date

(that is 18-03-2012), the Right of Way to the Concessionaire in respect of all land

included in the Appendix. Total land to be acquired is 504 Ha. At following locations

the construction work is affected due to non-clearance by Forest Department:

Table 3.1 Details of Forest areas

Eco-Sensitive Zone: NHAI vide their letter No. NHAI/PIU/PNVL/BOT/NH-17/PNL-

IND/ECO/2012/1841 dt. 24-12-‘12 has instructed Concessionaire to stop the

Sl No Chainage

Length (m) From To

1 2+545 2+610 65

2 6+300 6+500 200

3 6+500 6+620 120

4 6+620 6+680 60

5 6+850 6+930 80

6 6+960 7+400 440

7 7+500 7+770 270

8 7+850 7+915 65

9 7+915 8+350 435

10 8+600 10+100 1,500

11 10+580 10+625 45

12 10+625 10+640 15

13 10+640 10+680 40

14 11+135 11+275 140

15 11+630 11+900 270

16 11+900 11+950 50

17 12+110 12+220 110

18 12+220 12+580 360

19 12+580 12+925 345

20 12+925 13+130 205

21 13+130 13+250 120

22 13+250 13+565 315

23 13+565 13+620 55

24 13+910 14+120 210

25 14+310 14+575 265

26 15+745 15+775 30

27 15+775 15+790 15

28 16+540 16+800 260

TOTAL 6,085


construction works in the Eco-Sensitive zone (Ch. 0+000 to 20+100). Approval for

non core area (length 16.6 km) of Eco-Sensitive Zone has been obtained. However,

PCCF Maharashtra has asked to obtain NGT approval.

Salt Pan Land (Ch. 31+700 to 33+200): NHAI vide their letter no.

NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/SPITPL/2015/2371 dt. 23-02-’15 has informed Concessionaire

regarding handing over of possession of salt plan land.

3.2 Tree Cutting & Plantation

Details of tree cutting are given in Table 3.2. Tree cutting works are in advanced

progress.

Table 3.2 Details of Tree Cutting

Description Scheduled Trees Non-Scheduled Trees Remarks

Total 2390 7964

Removed / Cut 4985

Balance 5369

Table 3.3 Details of Plantation done by Concessionaire

Description Chainage

Status From To

Median Plantation

(Shrubs) - -

Not yet done.

Project construction is still in progress.

Avenue Plantation

(trees) - -

Not yet done.

Project construction is still in progress.

3.3 Details of Utility Shifting

Details of utility shifting is given in Table 3.4 Table 3.4 Details of Utility Shifting

Sl No

Description Total

Length (m) Status

A CIDCO Water Pipe Lines

5080 m CIDCO water pipe line shifting work has recently started.

B Reliance / NOCIL Gas Pipeline

690 m

The exact location of pipeline identified. Concessionaire has to submit proposal by modifying the piers P11 (L), P12 (L), P13 (L) and P15 (R). The abutment A1 may be converted to pier and retaining wall type. The 4” pipe which comes in embankment portion may be encased by utility owner.

C MSEDCL Electrical Lines & Poles (17 DTC Transformers,

4,850m LHS

21,050m RHS

Very slow progress. Out of total 237 crossings, only 3 nos. crossings done so far.


3.4 Design Review

Table 3.5 Design Review

Sl No

Description Status

1 Plan & Profile Drawing Main Carriageway

77.747 Km Concurred. Concessionaire for Ch. 43+000 to 44+000 withdrawn. 3.000 Km (Ch. 7+500 to 10+500) not yet concurred.

2 Plan & Profile Drawing Service Road 19.67 Km. on LHS concurred. 17.42 Km. on RHS Concurred.

3 Structures 746 Nos. drawings concurred.

4 Major Junctions 11 nos are Concurred.

5 Minor junctions 88 nos are Concurred.

6 Quality Assurance Manual Concurred. Two more copies to be submitted by Concessionaire.

7 Health, Safety and Environment Plan Concurred. Two more copies to be submitted by Concessionaire.

8 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Concessionaire has not submitted EMP incorporating IE’s comments.

9 Construction Programme

Concessionaire has recently submitted request for Extension of Time (EOT) upto Nov ’16. Recently detailed programme submitted which is recommended to NHAI for approval alongwith EOT upto March ’16 (Ch 20+100 to 84+600) and June ’16 (0+000 to 20+100)

10 Borrow Areas for Section-1 18 nos are concurred.

11 Borrow Areas for Section-2 27 nos are concurred.

12 Section - I Concrete mix designs M10,M15, M20, M25, M30,M35,M40, M40-pile, with Natural sand +Crusher sand ,M-45 PSC With 100% Natural sand

Concurred

13 Section - II Concrete mix designs M15, M20, M25, Concurred

665 HT Poles, 841 LT Poles, 96 HT Crossings, 138 LT Crossings and 3 river crossings)

D MJP Water Pipeline (200 to 450 mm Ø Water line)

19,840m LHS

4,180m RHS

Shifting works in very slow progress. Pipe laid for 7 Km only out of total length of 23.5 Km.

E ISPAT Water Pipeline

21,670m LHS

70m RHS

Shifting works in progress. 4.1 Km length shifting completed.

F ZP water pipeline 5,090m LHS

4,030m RHS Slow progress in shifting.


Sl No

Description Status

M30, with Natural sand +Crusher sand , M-45PSC With 100% Natural sand

14 Hume pipes source approval for M/s Sagar Spun Pipes Concurred

15 GSB Mix design. Concurred

16 WMM Mix design. Concurred

17 DBM Mix Designs - Grading I for both sections Concurred

18 DBM Mix Designs - Grading II for Section - I Concurred

19 BC Mix Design - Grading II for Section - II Concurred

20 Source Approval for Coarse aggregates, Fine aggregates, water, ACC cement OPC Grade-53, SS1 & RS1 for section I

Concurred

21 Source Approval for Coarse aggregates, Fine aggregates, water, Ambuja cement OPC Grade-53 for section II

Concurred

22 Source Approval for Bitumen VG30 (BPCL) for both Sections

Concurred

23 BM Mix Design for section - I & II Concurred

24 Section-1 Concrete mix design M-10, M-20, M-30, M-

35, with 100% crusher sand with Ambuja & ACC cement.

Concurred

25 Concrete mix design M-20 for Kerb both sections Concurred

26 Concrete mix design M-40 grade with 100% crusher sand for Crash Barrier for section- I

Concurred

27 Concrete Mix Design for Cable Grout with Cebex 100

FOSROC Concurred

28 Source Approval for Bitumen Emulsion SS-1 & RS-1 from IWL INDIA Ltd

Concurred

29 Source Approval for Curing Compound BASF MASTERKURE 1061

Concurred

30 Source Approval for Procurement of Steel

Reinforcement, Fe-500 Grade-RINL (Vizag Steel) Concurred

31 Source Approval for Procurement of Cement, 53 Grade- Ultra Tech Cement

Concurred

32 Source Approval for Procurement of Steel Reinforcement, Fe-500 Grade-SAIL

Concurred

33 Source Approval for Procurement of Cement, 53

Grade- ACC Cement Concurred

34 Source Approval for Procurement Wedge and Anchor Cones

Concurred

35 Source Approval for Procurement of Admixture, Fosroc - Conplast SP 430

Concurred

36 Source Approval for Procurement of Admixture, BASF Rheobuild 821 EJ

Concurred

37 Source Approval for Procurement of Cement, 53 Grade- SANGHI Cement

Concurred


Sl No

Description Status

38 Section-II- Concrete Mix Design of M-30 (RE Block) With ACC Cement 53 Grade

Concurred

39 Section-II- Concrete Mix Design of M-40 RCC With Ambuja Cement 53 Grade

Concurred

40 Source Approval for Procurement of Admixture, Chembond KEM SP 40

Concurred

41 Source Approval for Procurement of Steel SAIL TMT EQR

Concurred

42

Section - II Concrete Mix Design for M-15 PCC, M-20 RCC, M- 20 PCC Kerb, M-25 RCC, M-30 RCC, M- 35 RCC and M-40 RCC with ACC Cement (53 Grade) With CHEMBOND and BASF Admixture with 100% Crusher Sand.

Concurred

43

Section - II Concrete Mix Design for M-15 PCC, M-20 RCC, , M-25 RCC, M-30 RCC, M- 35 RCC and M-40 RCC with SANGHI Cement (53 Grade) With CHEMBOND and BASF Admixture with 100% Crusher Sand.

Concurred

44 Source Approval for HT strands Procured From TATA Steel

Concurred

45 Concurrence of Mix Design for Mastic Asphalt For Section-(I Km 0+000 to 42+000)

Concurred

46 Mix Design For Dry Lean Concrete. Concurred

47 Mix Design For Pavement Quality Concrete. Concurred

48

Concrete Mix Design for M-15 PCC, M-20 RCC, , M-25

RCC, M-30 RCC, M- 35 RCC and M-40 RCC with Ultratech Cement (53 Grade) With CHEMBOND Admixture.

Concurred

49 Concrete Mix Design for M-15 PCC, M-20 RCC, , M-25 RCC, M-30 RCC, M- 35 RCC and M-40 RCC with Ultratech Cement (53 Grade) With BASF Admixture.

Concurred

50 Concrete Mix Design for M-20 PCC (Kerb) with Ultratech Cement (53 Grade).

Concurred

51 Source Approval for Procurement of Emulsion Bitumen (SS-1 & RS-1) from M/s HINDUSTAN COLAS LIMITED

Concurred

3.5 Progress of Major Works

The cumulative quantities are given in Table 3.6.

Table 3.6 Cumulative Quantities Executed

Sl No

Description Unit Cumulative Planned*

Cumulative Executed

Reported by Concessionaire*

Assessed by IE

1 Excavation Soil -Highway

Cum 8,90,545 8,66,675

2 Excavation - Hard rock Cum - 39,240


*CConcessionaire has not submitted Progress Report for the month. Revised

construction programme was submyet to be approved.

Table 3.7 Highway Works Lengths Completed

Description LHS (m) RHS (m)

Clearing & Grubbing 31,560 52,630

Embankment 31,450 46,240

Subgrade 23,937 40,470

Granular Sub base (GSB) 21,710 36,280

Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) 20,610 33,205

Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM) 18,460 31,310

Bituminous Concrete (BC) 1,940 2,600

Table 3.8 Summary of Progress of Structures

Sl No Description Total Nos Work in

Progress Not yet Started

1 Major Bridges 6 6 0

2 Flyovers 2 0 1 (1 no Deleted)

3 ROB’s 3 1 2

4 Minor Bridges 23 20 3

5 Vehicular Underpasses 11 6 5

6 Pedestrian Underpasses 15 6 9

7 Pipe culverts 208+20 116 112

8 Box culverts 135+1 105 31

3 Embankment Cum 36,28,182 35,49,095

4 Subgrade Cum 6,10,108 4,71,229

5 Granular Sub base Cum 2,03,340 1,60,076

6 Wet Mix Macadam Cum 1,61,171 1,28,810

7 Bituminous Macadam Cum 31,141 0

8 Dense Bituminous Macadam

Cum 59,823 43,955

9 Bituminous Concrete Cum 7,486 1,580

10 Excavation-Structures Cum 69,685 64,200

11 PCC M15 Cum 6,834 6,383

12 RCC M20, M25, M30 Cum 47,918 43,191

13 RCC M35 / RE wall fascia blocks

Cum 10,228 8,559

14 RCC M40,M45 Cum 3,334 3,055

15 Reinforcement Tonne 4,644 4,128

16 PSC Strand Tonne - 60


3.6 Miscellaneous Works

Miscellaneous works are not yet started.

3.7 Status of Project Facilities

Sl No Proposed facility Chainage (Km) Status

1 Traffic aid post Not yet constructed

2 Medical aid post Not yet constructed

3 Vehicle rescue post Not yet constructed

4 Toll plaza administrative building

(1) 0+000 To 42+000

(2) 42+000 To 84+600 Not yet constructed

5 Telecom System Not yet constructed

3.8 Overall Progress

Concessionaire’s reported progress details are on higher side. Independent Engineer

estimated the approximate quantities executed and accordingly approximate

percentage progress was estimated.

Total Project Cost: Rs. 942.69 Crores. (As per Con cession Agreement)

Total Project Cost: Rs. 1205.72 Crores (As reported by Concessionaire) Time Elapsed: 38.5 Months

Description Planned

Achieved

Reported by

Concessionaire*

Assessed by

IE

Physical Progress :

Cumulative Physical Progress (%) 39.89 % 34.86 %

Cumulative Percentage Physical Lag (-) / Lead (+)

(-) 5.03 %

Financial Progress :

Cumulative Financial Progress (Rs. Crores)

482.83 425.62

Cumulative Financial Progress (%) 40.04 % 35.30 %

Cumulative Financial

Lag (-) / Lead (+)

(-) 57.21 Crores

(-) 4.74 %

* Concessionaire has not submitted Progress Report for the month.


Table 3.9 Details of Physical Progress

Month Monthly Physical Progress (%) Cumulative Physical Progress (%)

Scheduled Actual Scheduled Actual

Dec. ‘11 0.36 % 0.00 % 0.36 % 0 %

Jan. ‘12 1.57 % 1.75 % 1.93 % 1.75 %

Feb. ‘12 3.17 % 1.22 % 5.10 % 2.97 %

Mar. ‘12 4.50 % 0.60 % 9.60 % 3.57 %

Apr. ‘12 5.01 % 0.90 % 14.61 % 4.47 %

May ‘12 4.90 % 1.30 % 19.51 % 5.77 %

Jun. ‘12 2.48 % 0.99 % 21.99 % 6.76 %

Jul. ‘12 1.79 % 0.33 % 23.78 % 7.09 %

Aug. ‘12 1.25 % 0.69 % 25.03 % 7.78 %

Sept. ‘12 0.3 % 0.69 % 25.33 % 8.47 %

Oct. ‘12 0.60 % 1.58 % 25.93 % 10.05 %

Nov. ‘12 0.85 % 2.14 % 26.78 % 12.19 %

Dec. ‘12 0.76 % 0.45 % 27.54 % 12.64 %

Jan. ‘13 3.49 % 1.61 % 31.03 % 14.25 %

Feb. ‘13 4.39 % 2.90 % 35.42 % 17.15 %

Mar. ‘13 4.92 % 3.21 % 40.34 % 20.36 %

Apr. ‘13 5.20 % 4.59 % 45.54 % 24.95 %

May ‘13 5.65 % 2.77 % 51.19 % 27.72 %

Jun. ‘13 4.40 % 0.25 % 55.59 % 27.97 %

Jul. ‘13 2.71 % 0.29 % 58.30 % 28.26 %

Aug. ‘13 2.86 % 0.22 % 61.16 % 28.48 %

Sept. ‘13 3.27 % 0.17 % 64.43 % 28.65 %

Oct. ‘13 4.39 % 0.30 % 68.82 % 28.95 %

Nov. ‘13 4.89 % 0.78 % 73.71 % 29.73 %

Dec. ‘13 5.62 % 0.49 % 79.33 % 30.22 %

Jan. ‘14 5.90 % 0.53 % 85.23 % 30.75 %

Feb. ‘14 6.06 % 0.42 % 91.29 % 31.17 %

Mar. ‘14 6.41 % 1.37 % 97.70 % 32.54 %

Apr. ‘14 1.47 % 1.02 % 99.17 % 33.56 %

May ‘14 0.83 % 0.72 % 100.00 % 34.28 %

June ‘14 0.00 % 0.40 % 100.00 % 34.68 %

July ‘14 - 0.05 % - 34.73 %

Aug ‘14 - 0.01 % - 34.74 %

Sept. ‘14 - 0.04 % - 34.78 %

Oct. ‘14 - 0.03 % - 34.81 %

Nov. ‘14 - 0.02 % - 34.83 %

Dec. ‘14 - 0.00 % - 34.83 %

Jan. ‘15 - 0.01 % - 34.84 %

Month Monthly Physical Progress (%) Cumulative Physical Progress (%)

Scheduled Actual Scheduled Actual

Cum. Upto end Jan '15

- - - 34.84 %

Feb. ‘15 5.05 % 0.02 % 39.89 % 34.86 %

Mar. ‘15 5.14 % 45.03 %

Apr. ‘15 5.59 % 50.62 %

May ‘15 5.80 % 56.42 %

June ‘15 5.85 % 62.27 %

July ‘15 2.63 % 64.90 %


Aug ‘15 2.13 % 67.03 %

Sept. ‘15 2.12 % 69.15 %

Oct. ‘15 5.42 % 74.57 %

Nov. ‘15 5.44 % 80.01 %

Dec. ‘15 5.15 % 85.16 %

Jan. ‘16 5.05 % 90.21 %

Feb. ‘16 5.03 % 95.24 %

Mar. ‘16 1.66 % 96.90 %

Apr '16 1.13 % 98.03 %

May '16 1.12 % 99.15 %

June '16 0.85 % 100.00 %

Table 3.10 Details of Financial Progress

Month

Monthly Financial Progress Cumulative Financial Progress

Rs. Crores Percentage (%) Rs. Crores Percentage (%)

Scheduled Actual Scheduled Actual Scheduled Actual Scheduled Actual

Dec. ‘11 117.57 98.72 9.75 % 8.19% 117.57 98.72 9.75 % 8.19%

Jan. ‘12 18.93 16.12 1.57 % 1.34% 136.50 114.84 11.32 % 9.53%

Feb. ‘12 20.93 11.7 1.74 % 0.97% 157.43 126.54 13.06 % 10.50%

Mar. ‘12 25.08 6.72 2.08 % 0.56% 182.51 133.26 15.14 % 11.06%

Apr. ‘12 28.75 9.22 2.38 % 0.76% 211.26 142.48 17.52 % 11.82%

May ‘12 33.05 12.41 2.74 % 1.03% 244.31 154.89 20.26 % 12.85%

Jun. ‘12 28.75 9.90 2.38 % 0.82% 273.06 164.79 22.65 % 13.67%

Jul. ‘12 22.84 4.44 1.89 % 0.37% 295.90 169.23 24.54 % 14.04%

Aug. ‘12 17.74 7.45 1.47 % 0.62% 313.64 176.68 26.01 % 14.66%

Sept. ‘12 21.74 7.57 1.80 % 0.63% 335.38 184.25 27.82 % 15.29%

Oct. ‘12 24.16 14.40 2.00 % 1.19% 359.54 198.65 29.82 % 16.48%

Nov. ‘12 30.27 14.98 2.51 % 1.24% 389.81 213.63 32.33 % 17.72%

Dec. ‘12 34.31 4.24 2.85 % 0.35% 424.12 217.87 35.18 % 18.07%

Jan. ‘13 38.96 15.18 3.23 % 1.26% 463.08 233.05 38.41 % 19.33%

Feb. ‘13 44.91 26.9 3.72 % 2.23% 507.99 259.95 42.13 % 21.56%

Mar. ‘13 50.11 30.27 4.16 % 2.51% 558.1 290.22 46.29 % 24.07%

Apr. ‘13 53.86 43.44 4.47 % 3.60% 611.96 333.66 50.75 % 27.67%

May ‘13 58.28 26.34 4.83 % 2.18% 670.24 360.00 55.59 % 29.85%

Jun. ‘13 45.96 2.40 3.81 % 0.20% 716.20 362.4 59.40 % 30.05%

Jul. ‘13 29.36 0.98 2.44 % 0.08% 745.56 363.38 61.84 % 30.13%

Aug. ‘13 30.76 2.05 2.55 % 0.17% 776.32 365.43 64.39 % 30.30%

Sept. ‘13 34.82 1.61 2.89 % 0.13% 811.14 367.04 67.27 % 30.43%

Oct. ‘13 47.02 2.89 3.90 % 0.24% 858.16 369.93 71.17 % 30.67%

Nov. ‘13 51.96 7.36 4.31 % 0.61% 910.12 377.29 75.48 % 31.28%

Dec. ‘13 59.16 4.56 4.91 % 0.38% 969.28 381.85 80.39 % 31.66%

Jan. ‘14 62.96 5.07 5.22 % 0.42% 1032.24 386.92 85.61 % 32.08%

Feb. ‘14 64.56 3.97 5.35 % 0.33% 1096.8 390.89 90.97 % 32.41%

Mar. ‘14 73.75 12.91 6.12 % 1.07% 1170.55 403.80 97.08 % 33.48%


Month




Apr. ‘14 20.90 9.52 1.73 % 0.79% 1191.45 413.32 98.82 % 34.27%

May ‘14 14.27 6.87 1.18 % 0.57% 1205.72 420.19 100.00 % 34.84%

June ‘14 0.00 3.74 0.00 % 0.31% 1205.72 423.93 100.00 % 35.15%

July ‘ 14 - 0.48 - 0.04% - 424.41 - 35.19%

Aug ‘14 - 0.12 - 0.01% - 424.53 - 35.20%

Sept. ‘14 - 0.37 - 0.03% - 424.90 - 35.23%

Oct. ‘14 - 0.24 - 0.02% - 425.14 - 35.25%

Nov. ‘14 - 0.24 - 0.02% - 425.38 - 35.27%

Dec. ‘14 - 0.00 - 0.00% - 425.38 - 35.27%

Jan. ‘15 - 0.01 - 0.00% - 425.39 - 35.27%

Month




Cu. Upto Jan ’15

- - - - - 425.39 - 35.27%

Feb. ‘15 57.44 0.23 4.76 % 0.02% 482.83 425.62 40.04% 35.29%

Mar. ‘15 58.26 4.83 % 541.09 44.88%

Apr. ‘15 62.41 5.18 % 603.50 50.05%

May ‘15 64.49 5.35 % 667.99 55.40%

June ‘15 64.98 5.39 % 732.97 60.79%

July ‘ 15 34.64 2.87 % 767.61 63.66%

Aug ‘15 29.83 2.47 % 797.44 66.14%

Sept. ‘15 29.83 2.47 % 827.27 68.61%

Oct. ‘15 60.94 5.05 % 888.21 73.67%

Nov. ‘15 60.92 5.05 % 949.13 78.72%

Dec. ‘15 58.24 4.83 % 1007.37 83.55%

Jan. ‘16 57.34 4.76 % 1064.71 88.30%

Feb. ‘16 57.17 4.74 % 1121.88 93.05%

Mar. ‘16 25.40 2.11 % 1147.28 95.15%

Apr '16 20.36 1.69 % 1167.64 96.84%

May '16 20.33 1.69 % 1187.97 98.53%

June ‘16 17.69 1.47 % 1205.72 100.00%


Cumulative Physical Progress (%)

34.86%

65.14%

Achieved Balance

Cumulative Financial Progress (%)

35.30%

64.70%

Achieved Balance


Physical Progress (%) S - Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

De

c '1

1Ja

n '1

2Fe

b '1

2M

ar '1

2A

pr

'12

May

'12

Jun

'12

Jul '

12

Au

g '1

2Se

p '1

2O

ct '1

2N

ov

'12

De

c '1

2Ja

n '1

3Fe

b '1

3M

ar '1

3A

pr

'13

May

'13

Jun

'13

Jul '

13

Au

g '1

3Se

p '1

3O

ct '1

3N

ov

'13

De

c '1

3Ja

n '1

4Fe

b '1

4M

ar '1

4A

pr

'14

May

'14

Jun

e '1

4Ju

ly '1

4A

ug

'14

Sep

t '1

4O

ct '1

4N

ov

'14

De

c. '1

4Ja

n. '

15

Feb

'15

Mar

'15

Ap

r '1

5M

ay '1

5Ju

ne

'15

July

'15

Au

g '1

5Se

pt '

15

Oct

'15

No

v '1

5D

ec.

'15

Jan

. '1

6Fe

b '1

6M

ar '1

6A

pr

'16

May

'16

Jun

e '1

6

Cum. Scheduled Progress (New Programme) Cum. Achieved Progress Cum. Scheduled Progress (Original programme)

65

25

MILE STONE - II (65%)

MILE STONE - I (25%)M

ILE S

TO

NE -

I (2

5 %

)

MIL

ESTO

NE

-II

(65

%)

MIL

E S

TO

NE -

I (2

5%

)


Physical Progress (%) - Histogram

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

De

c '1

1

Jan

'12

Feb

'12

Mar

'12

Ap

r '1

2

May

'12

Jun

'12

Jul '

12

Au

g '1

2

Sep

'12

Oct

'12

No

v '1

2

De

c '1

2

Jan

'13

Feb

'13

Mar

'13

Ap

r '1

3

May

'13

Jun

'13

Jul '

13

Au

g '1

3

Sep

'13

Oct

'13

No

v '1

3

De

c '1

3

Jan

'14

Feb

'14

Mar

'14

Ap

r '1

4

May

'14

Jun

e '1

4

July

'14

Au

g '1

4

Sep

t '1

4

Oct

'14

No

v '1

4

De

c. '1

4

Jan

. '1

5

Feb

'15

Mar

'15

Ap

r '1

5

May

'15

Jun

e '1

5

July

'15

Au

g '1

5

Sep

t '1

5

Oct

'15

No

v '1

5

De

c. '1

5

Jan

. '1

6

Feb

'16

Mar

'16

Ap

r '1

6

May

'16

Jun

e '1

6

Scheduled Actual Progress


Financial Progress (Rs. Crores) S - Curve

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

De

c '1

1Ja

n '1

2Fe

b '1

2M

ar '1

2A

pr

'12

May

'12

Jun

'12

Jul '

12

Au

g '1

2Se

p '1

2O

ct '1

2N

ov

'12

De

c '1

2Ja

n '1

3Fe

b '1

3M

ar '1

3A

pr

'13

May

'13

Jun

'13

Jul '

13

Au

g '1

3Se

p '1

3O

ct '1

3N

ov

'13

De

c '1

3Ja

n '1

4Fe

b '1

4M

ar '1

4A

pr

'14

May

'14

Jun

'14

July

'14

Au

g '1

4Se

pt '

14

Oct

'14

No

v'1

4D

ec

'14

Jan

'15

Feb

'15

Mar

'15

Ap

r '1

5M

ay '1

5Ju

ne

'15

July

;15

Au

g '1

5Se

pt '

15

Oct

'15

No

v '1

5D

ec

'15

Jan

'16

Feb

'16

Mar

'16

Ap

r '1

6M

ay '1

6Ju

ne

'16

Cum. Scheduled Progress ( New Programme) Cum. Actual Progress Cum. Scheduled Progress (Original Programme)

MILESTONE - II (65%)

MILE STONE - I (25%)

MIL

ESTO

NE

-II

(65%

)

MIL

E S

TO

NE -

I (2

5%

)


Financial Progress (Rs. Crores) – Histogram

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

De

c '1

1

Jan

'12

Feb

'12

Mar

'12

Ap

r '1

2

May

'12

Jun

'12

Jul '

12

Au

g '1

2

Sep

'12

Oct

'12

No

v '1

2

De

c '1

2

Jan

'13

Feb

'13

Mar

'13

Ap

r '1

3

May

'13

Jun

'13

Jul '

13

Au

g '1

3

Sep

'13

Oct

'13

No

v '1

3

De

c '1

3

Jan

'14

Feb

'14

Mar

'14

Ap

r '1

4

May

'14

Jun

'14

July

'14

Au

g '1

4

Sep

t '1

4

Oct

'14

No

v'1

4

De

c '1

4

Jan

'15

Feb

'15

Mar

'15

Ap

r '1

5

May

'15

Jun

e '1

5

July

;15

Au

g '1

5

Sep

t '1

5

Oct

'15

No

v '1

5

De

c '1

5

Jan

'16

Feb

'16

Mar

'16

Ap

r '1

6

May

'16

Jun

e '1

6

Scheduled (Rs Crores) Actual (Rs. Crores)


4.0 QUALITY CONTROL & QUALITY ASSURANCE

4.1 Quality Control & Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance of a Project is defined as a process which exercises various checks

at different stages of a work right from its inception till its acceptance, to put it in

services to ensure that the work has been properly designed and constructed as per

approved designs, drawings and specifications.

Quality Control is defined as the procedure adopted and control exercised to ensure

that the materials proposed to be used in production, processes adopted for

production and workmanship of production conform to the prescribed standards and

laid down acceptance criteria.

The Quality Control is exercised by construction agency that ensures that the defined

objective is achieved through appropriate tests, checks and inspections by suitable

qualified personnel. Furthermore, the objective evidences of all tests, checks and

inspections carried out from time to time are documented in prescribed formats for

reference and record.

Independent Engineer’s professional staff is frequently checking various works at site

and wherever found necessary, corrective measures are suggested to the

Concessionaire.

4.2 Compliance/Non-Compliance

Non-Compliance cases are being reported through Non-Conformance Reports.

Concessionaire is constantly advised to take necessary rectifications for such non-

compliances in time. List of NCR’s issued and their statuses are given in Table 4.1. &

4.2. Concessionaire has been constantly advised to make necessary rectifications

and submit for closure of NCR within stipulated time. Many NCR’s are not yet closed

out in spite of several reminders.

4.3 Routine Inspection by Independent Engineer

Independent Engineer is conducting routine inspection of the works at site and

notifying the Concessionaire about any non-compliance observed. List of Site

Inspection Note issued so far is given in Table 4.3. Details of Audit Reports issued to

the Concessionaire are given in Table 4.4. Details of tests carried out are given in

Table 4.5 . Concessionaire has submitted compliances to all the reports together and

was reviewed by Independent Engineer. Many inspection points are not yet

complied. A compiled report of such pending site inspection points are again issued

to Concessionaire for necessary compliance.

Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February '15 Page 54

Independent Engineer is conducting routine inspection of the works at site and

notifying Concessionaire about any non-compliance observed.

Details of RFI’s reviewed by Independent Engineer

Month Percentage of RFI’s Reviewed

February ’15 24 %

Table 4.1 Status of NCR’s Issued by Independent Engineer (Closed Out)

Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side

Description Rectifications Proposed on

Details of Rectifications Done

1 1 18-04-'12 40+246 (RHS) Length of Box Culvert on RHS is less by 500mm.

11-09-‘12

Structure is Constructed as per Revised Drawing No. MRIPL/SC/LSD/40+246, Rev No. R1

2 2 18-04-'12 21+310 to

21+380 (LHS)

WMM works without concurrence of drawings / Mix Design.

14-06-'12

GSB & WMM Mix design concurred vide IE's Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2012 / 0197 and 198 dt. 03-05-'12.

3 3 20-04-'12 79+940 to

80+530 (RHS)

WMM works without compaction & concurrence of Mix Design.

14-06-'12

GSB & WMM Mix design concurred vide IE's Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2012/ 0197 and 198 dt. 03-05-'12.

4 4 21-04-'12 0+544 (Minor

Bridge) SBC of foundation not determined

27-07-'12 Safe Bearing Capacity assessed and details submitted.

5 5 21-04-'12 20+144

(Balganga Major Bridge)

SBC of foundation not determined


6 6 21-04-'12 26+188

(Bhogeshwari Major Bridge)



7 7 21-04-'12 52+155 (Nidi Minor bridge)



8 8 21-04-'12 72+936

(Kundlika Major bridge)



9 9 21-04-'12 77+804 (Bhuvan

Minor bridge)



10 10 21-04-'12 81+600

(Wave Minor bridge)



11 11 21-04-'12 84+488 (Indapur

Major bridge)



12 12 25-04-'12 20+754 Non-Curing of structure. 16-07-'13 Rebound hammer test &


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side



Minor bridge ultra sonic test conducted and found acceptable.

13 13 25-04-'12 80+840 Checking of Horizontal Alignment

29-06-'12 Horizontal alignment checked through RFI No-12058 dt. 22-06-'12

14 14 25-05-'12 38+801 (RHS) Box Culvert-

39/1 Length less by 506 mm 11-09-`12

Structure is constructed as per Revised Drawing No. MRIPL/SC/LSD/38+801, Rev No. R1.

15 15 25-05-'12 39+030 (RHS) Box Culvert-

39/2, Length less by 465mm 11-09-`12


16 16 25-05-'12 39+133 (RHS) Box Culvert-

39/3, Length less by 400mm 11-09-`12


17 17 25-05-'12 39+562 (RHS) Box Culvert-

40/1, Length less by 500mm 11-09-`12


18 18 25-05-'12 39+807 (RHS) Box Culvert-

40/2, Length less by 500mm 11-09-`12


19 19 25-05-'12 40+906 (RHS) Box Culvert-

41/2, Length less by 506mm 11-09-`12


20 20 25-05-'12 41+189 (RHS) Box Culvert-

41/4, Length more by 1.4m 09-10-`12

Superstructure constructed as per concurred drawing.

21 21 25-05-'12 41+336

(RHS)- Box Culvert-41/5,

Length more by 1.58m 06-10-`12 Superstructure constructed as per concurred drawing.

22 22 26-05-'12 47+244 (RHS) Slab Culvert Concrete bulged due to improper support

11-09-`12 Rectification done.

23 23 15-06-'12 26+188

Bhogeshwari Bridge

Abutment A2-3rd Lift.(RFI No.-2819)

11-07-'13

Rebound hammer test & ultrasonic test conducted. Results found acceptable.

24 24 16-06-'12 45+460 to

45+560 (RHS)

Embankment 8th Layer failed in compaction and boulders present.

06-12-`12

Boulder removed, compacted and retested. Achieved required compaction.

25 27 22-06-'12 79+990 to

80+150 (RHS) & 80+220 to

DBM Mix not Conforming to Concurred JMF.

02-08-`12 Core sample collected and retested. Found acceptable.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side



80+285

26 29 25-08-'12 45+864 (RHS)

Finished concrete of Corbel is not in line. Honeycombing also observed in final lift wall.

17-12-'12

Rectified as per line and level, offsets was ground and honeycombing repaired with PMC mortar

27 30 06-11-'12 Kharpada Bridge P12 Foundation

Founding Strata is not embedded 1500 mm in Soft rock. Also Confirmatory SBC test not Carried out.

31-12-`12 Further excavated to a depth of 600 mm in hard Rock and PCC laid.

28 32 12-01-'13 69+140,

77+376 & 46+122

Concrete cubes (28 Days) Failed - M20, M25, & M30,

24-04-‘14 Retesting done using ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer.

29 36 20-02-'13 69+140 (RHS) Minor Bridge

Slab

Superstructure staging and scaffolding was carried out without any design and drawing as per Concession Agreement clause no. - 70.11.

20-11-‘13

Staging and scaffolding RFI’s checked by PMC. The design calculation submitted now. Deck slab concreting successfully completed.

30 40 12-04-‘13 2+200

Diversion plan not Submitted for concurrence. Entry/Exit to diversion are not smoothly merged with the existing road causing sag formation at joining. Location of diversion is chosen wrongly; At entry, one electric pole is obstructing the width of diversion. Sign / diversion boards have not been placed properly.

06-05-‘14 The diversion at Ch. 2+200 is closed and four lane is in operation.

31 42 30-04-'13 25+300 (RHS)

Pipe Culvert

Honeycombing is observed in pipe culvert encasing concrete. Due to this reinforcement is exposed.

28-05-'13 Honeycombing repairing done.

32 43 30-04-'13 26+188 (RHS)

PCC is carried out without safe bearing capacity test. Founding level is 1.381m above founding level as per concurred drawing.

03-07-'13

(1) The rock sample at the PCC level where the foundation is to be rest is tested at third party laboratory.

(2) The foundation for Abutment A1 on RHS is resting at level 0.653 m which is 0.95m below design foundation level.

33 44 01-04-'13 39+430 to

39+450 (RHS)

GSB sample collected and tested in Lab and found on coarser side.

05-05-‘14

Joint re-sampling done and observed that GSB material is within specification limits.

34 46 02-05-'13 20+144 (RHS) Balganga P1

M-35 grade concrete cubes has failed for 28 day's

16-07-'13 Rebound hammer test & ultra sonic test


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side



Footing strength. conducted and found acceptable.

35 49 16-05-'13 6+490

Diversion plan not submitted to IE for Concurrence. Diversion is sharp and unsafe.

05-05-‘14 The diversion at Ch. 6+490 is closed.

36 51 16-05-'13 38+801 (RHS)

Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/38+801 R1. It was already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.

16-05-‘14 Approach slab cast (RFI No. 55163 dt. 18-02-2014)

37 52 16-05-'13 39+030 (RHS)

Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 39+030 R1. It was already intimated earlier Letter No. PIP/ IE/SPITPL/2013 /0908 dt. - 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.


38 53 16-05-'13 39+133 (RHS)

Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 39+133 R1. It is already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.


39 54 16-05-'13 40+564 (RHS)

Approach slab not laid as per drawing no. MRIPL/SC/LSD/ 40+564 R1. It was already intimated wide Letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013/ 0908 dt. 30-01-’13 and inspection note no-17.


40 55 16-05-'13 40+750 (RHS)


16-05-‘14

Approach slab cast (RFI No. 52106 dt. 24-08-2013 & 52152 dt. 29-08-2013)

41 56 16-05-'13 40+906

Box Culvert



42 57 22-05-'13 40+246 (RHS) Box Culvert

Honeycombing was observed in both sides of

09-07-'13 The finishing rectification of concrete


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side



crash barrier wall. surface for crash barrier done as per specifications.

43 59 28-05-'13

Wadkhal Flyover P-31 Foundation

RHS

Reinforcement steel used is brittle and cracks are developed in bending of reinforcement steel (32 mm dia).

10-5-‘14

The reinforcement cage was removed and the foundation P-31 (RHS) is discarded and will not be put in use.

44 60 28-05-'13 4+375 (RHS)

NP4 pipe laid is not fitted and matched properly. Gap is observed in jointing at pipes.

05-07-'13 The finishing of the pipe joint is done as per Specifications.

45 66 17-06-'13 39+920 to

39+930 (RHS)

DBM surface totally damaged (New Construction).

07-06-‘14

Existing damaged DBM surface completely removed and new DBM layer laid.

46 67 18-06-'13 39+130

Box Culvert Settlement near box culvert.

07-06-‘14


47 68 18-06-'13 41+110 to

41+120 (RHS) Patches on DBM Surface on new carriageway.

07-06-‘14


48 69 18-06-'13 40+210 to

40+220 (RHS) Patches on DBM Surface on new carriageway.

07-06-‘14


49 85 23-07-'13 84+488

Indapur Side

The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching.

13-05-‘14 Works are carried out as per revised plan and profile drawing.

50 87 07-08-'13 Amba Bridge SAIL EQR steel is used for girder reinforcement without source approval.

21-12-‘13

Source approval of steel SAIL TMT EQR accorded as per Letter no. PIP/IE/ SPITPL/2013/1849 dt. 21-12-’13.

51 89 08-08-'13 RE Panel Casting

Lifting hook not been provided with Epoxy Paint.

02-05-‘14

Will be discarding the RE panels (Agency M/s Enviro Geo) and will not be put in use.

52 96 27-08-'13 57+650

RE Block (LHS)

Unapproved cement “SANGHI” is used for casting at RE blocks.

25-11-‘13

Now, the SANGHI cement source approval is concurred vide IE’s letter No. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2013 / 1724 dt. 08-11-‘13

53 97 31-08-‘13 Wadkhal

Flyover J2 outer girder

Prestressing girder is failed during second pre-stressing. Cones have gone inside and cracks have developed on diaphragm. This might have happened due to improper supporting system, poor quality of concrete and improper compaction of concrete.

02-05-‘14

Wadkhal Flyover damaged girder J2 (Casting dt. 05-07-’13) is discarded and will not be put in use.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side



54 98 31-08-‘13 Wadkhal

Flyover J2 outer girder

Prestressing girder is failed during second pre-stressing. Cones have gone inside and cracks have developed on diaphragm. This might have happened due to improper supporting system, poor quality of concrete and improper compaction of concrete.

02-05-‘14

Wadkhal Flyover damaged girder J2 (Casting dt. 30-05-’13) is discarded and will not be put in use.

55 99 01-10-‘13 Wadkhal Flyover

Procedure for CPCC treatment is not being followed. Steel which is being used for reinforcement of Wadkhal girder has rust.

27-05-‘14 CPCC Treatment done and checked through RFI No-55680

56 100 04-10-‘13 Wadkhal

Girder P20 - P21 (LHS)

Anchor cone plate was broken and went inside after second stage stressing. This may be happened due to improper supporting system, poor quality of concrete and improper compaction of concrete.

02-05-‘14

Wadkhal Flyover damaged girder P20 -P21 (LHS) is discarded and will not be put in use.

57 103 07-01-‘14 5+000 VUP

(LHS)

During the concreting it was observed that the concrete mix of M-30G, slump measured 175 mm which is more than the specification limit of 75-125mm. This will affect the quality and durability of the structure.

07-05-‘14

Non-destructive test reports (Rebound Hammer test and Ultra Sonic Pulse Velocity test) conducted and observed that the concrete is of acceptable quality.

58 106 20-01-‘14 42+000 to 84+000

Hume pipes of 1200 mm diameter (NP3) procured for pipe culverts. These are not as per specifications. Also the frequency testing is not being carried out before procurement.

18-03-‘14

The RCC hume pipes intended for the Project were tested. Test results are satisfactory.

59 107 23-01-‘14 15+878

Reinforcement steel not stacked properly. Major stock of the steel is lying on the ground which leads to the corrosion.

25-05-‘14

The steel was re-stacked and checked through RFI No. 27298 dt. 08-02-2014

60 110 28-01-‘14

RE Panel Casting in Section-I

Casting Yard

Curing is not carried out on RE panel which is stacked in the casting yard. Further casting date is not mentioned in RE panels. This will effect the quality & durability of the RE panel.

10-05-‘14

Non-destructive test reports (Rebound Hammer test and Ultra Sonic Pulse Velocity test) conducted and observed that the concrete is of acceptable quality.

61 118 19-02-‘14 26+188 (RHS) Bhogeshwari

Concreting is carried out from transit mixer which

07-07-‘14 Cube compressive

strength results are


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side



Bridge P1 & P2 crash barrier

parked on existing bridge without any safety measures. Also it is observed that concrete poured in chute without proper angle. This improper way of concreting is not acceptable.

acceptable.

Concessionaire confirmed that the traffic police was deployed to control the traffic movement. However, the Concessionaire is warned about the safety aspects during such works in future.

62 120 21-04-‘14 42+155 (RHS)

Unapproved/unsuitable soil dumped in the Panvel side approach of PUP at Ch. 42+155 (Kasu). This was notified during site inspection on 12-04-‘2014.

28-07-‘14

Un-approved material removed and balance material tested and found within acceptable limits.

63 126 21-04-‘14 42+155 (RHS)

RE wall backfill material laid without approval of the material.

19-07-‘14

The Third party test results for RE wall fill material conducted at SSA Lbs. Pvt. Ltd and found within specifications.

Table 4.2 Status of NCR’s Issued by Independent Engineer (Not yet closed out)

Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side

Description Rectifications Proposed

on


1 25 22-06-'12

21+200 to 21+890 Diversion

(RHS)

Diversion Plan not concurred and No Sign Board Provided.

2 26 22-06-'12 80+040 (RHS)

DBM Works without Removal of Electric Pole Ch. 80+040 (RHS) Main Carriageway.

3 28 16-07-'12 44+194

Nigade bridge A2 Raft.

Concreting was carried out With excavator and Chute without planning. Height of fall of concrete is more than 1.5 m and concrete is totally segregated. Due to delay placing of concrete, cold joints were formed and rain protection is not done.

4 31 22-11-'12 78+200 to 78+510 (RHS)

DBM Carried without Casting of Kerb, Development of Cracks, and DBM thickness is not adequate.

5 33 23-01-'13 68+988 Minor

Bridge

Highway alignment & structure alignment not matching

6 34 30-01-'13 52+155 (RHS) Minor Bridge

Honeycombing in Pier, 7th lift. This might have


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


happened due to improper support, vibration and poor quality of concrete.

7 35 04-01-'13 23+650 (RHS)

Retaining wall under construction without concurrence of design & drawings. Provision for existing Pipe culvert on the retaining wall not provided.

8 37 20-02-'13 69+140 (RHS) Minor Bridge

Slab

SANGAM steel is used for reinforcement of deck slab without source approval.

9 38 21-02-'13 57+533

Box Culvert

The vertical main bars and slab main reinforcement SUN - TMX Un - approved steel used.

10 39 02-04-‘13

80+850 to 80+890 (Fresh Kerb Casting) and 80+890 to 81+140 (Old Laid Kerb) -

Casting of Kerb after cutting already laid DBM resulting in gap between Kerb and DBM. Development of crack on freshly laid Kerb. Saw cut grooves not made in the previously laid / old Kerb, development of cracks. No curing arrangement / application of curing compound.

11 41 17-04-‘13 24+550 to 24+730 (RHS)

DBM levels checked and found beyond permissible limits.

12 45 01-04-'13 52+335

Slab Culvert Slab culvert is widened on RHS side with pipe culvert.

13 47 03-05-'13 0+530 to 1+020

Diversion plan not submitted to IE for Concurrence. Entry (LHS) is very close to Minor bridge (km 0+545), where width is restricted due to construction of RCC crash barriers. Earthen shoulders in the entire stretch has not been made fully on LHS and RHS widening towards, existing road.

14 48 03-05-'13 25+330 to

25+900 (RHS)

Diversion plan not submitted to IE for Concurrence. Entry/exit are not smooth with sufficient length. Possible chances for overtopping of loaded vehicle coming from Indapur side and going towards Panvel while shifting from new carriageway to existing carriageway through


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


insufficient length of merging due to big level difference and sharp turning towards left.

15 50 16-05-'13 0+544

DBM is laid on deck slab of minor bridge. (As per concurred drawing wearing course consists of 25 mm thick mastic asphalt overlaid by bituminous concrete).

16 58 28-05-'13 29+610 (LHS)

Non - removal of tree stump located at the left edge of existing road is safety hazard.

17 61 31-05-'13 70+560 (RHS)

NP4 pipe laid is not fitted and matched properly. Gap is observed in jointing of pipes and PCC is partially done below pipe.

18 62 14-06-'13

Due to improper stacking of RCC girders, one of the girder is tilled. It will affect the quality and safety of the structure.

19 63 15-06-'13 77+900 (RHS)

DBM Surface Totally damaged (new construction).

20 64 15-06-'13 78+180 to 78+460 (RHS)

DBM Surface Totally damaged (new construction).

21 65 15-06-'13 80+650 (LHS) DBM Overlaid surface totally damaged.

22 70 19-06-'13 2+400 (LHS)

Damage of DBM Edges due to Non Construction of Proper earthen Shoulders to left hand Carriageway.

23 71 19-06-'13 46+620 (RHS)

Damage of DBM towards Shoulder and lack of protection made to the slope of return wall of structure.

24 72 19-06-'13 0+000 to 42+800

Diversions provided on Project road are not conforming to IRC: SP: 55 and IRC: SP: 84.

25 73 19-06-'13 2+400 (RHS) and 2+780

(LHS)

DBM Settlement in the full width of New Carriageway.

26 74 19-06-'13 42+000 to 84+000

Diversions provided on Project road are not conforming to IRC: SP: 55 and IRC: SP: 84.

27 75 16-07-'13 53+661 (RHS)

“Vaishnav Prime” Steel used in slab Box culvert and it’s working drawing not


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


submitted for IE’s Concurrence.

28 76 18-07-'13 81+606

Vave Bridge

Highway alignment and bridge alignment appears to be not matching.

29 77 19-07-'13 44+119

Nigade Bridge

Pile foundation work is carried out without conducting the initial pile load test and routine pile load test at P2 & P4 locations as per Clause-1113 of MoRTH specifications.

30 78 19-07-'13 15+480

Kharpada Bridge

Pile foundation work is carried out without conducting the initial pile load test and routine pile load test at A1, P1, P3, P4 & P5 locations as per Clause-1113 of MoRTH specifications.

31 79 22-07-'13 57+976 Patansai

The centerline of highway and bridge structure not matching. Center line of alignment not checked.

32 80 22-07-'13 62+348

Local Nallah


33 81 22-07-'13 69+140 Local

Nallah


34 82 23-07-'13 77+804

Bhuwan Bridge


35 83 23-07-'13 52+089

Nidi Bridge


36 84 23-07-'13 63+300

Local Nallah


37 86 02-08-'13 15+878

kharpada bridge

Girder G-2 stacked improperly on ground. Supports are not provided on bearing point of girder and supports are sunk, due to poor ground strata. Cracks also observed on surface of girder, diaphragm wall reinforcement are bent.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


38 88 07-08-'13 Pali Plant

“VAISHNAVI PRIME” steel is used for reinforcement of friction slab and crash barrier without source approval.

39 90 08-08-'13

Wadkhal Flyover girder

(J-2 outer 7 no.)

Precast girder is lifted and shifted to the stacking yard without carrying the grouting operation of cable. Further, support provided below girder is not proper. This will affect the quality and durability of structure.

40 91 21-08-'13

Wadkhal Flyover girder

No-1 to 9 (J-2 outer)

Pre-stressed girder concrete for Wadkhal Flyover was done with 100 % crusher sand.

41 92 21-08-'13 15+878 (RHS)

SAIL EQR and VAISHNAV Prime steel used in G-A type (P-12 to P-13) girder without source approval. There is no CPCC treatment carried out on reinforcement.

42 93 27-08-'13

26+188 Bhogeshwari

Bridge (RHS)

“VAISHNAV Prime” steel used in deck slab (P4- P5) Without source approval. Also concrete slump observed at site is 180 mm. This is not acceptable as per MoRTH specification Clause-81704.1.

43 94 27-08-'13

26+188 Bhogeshwari

Bridge (RHS)

Structure cracks formed at the girder no. G4 (P5-A2) span near A2 side bearing.

44 95 27-08-'13 23+450 to 23 +480 (RHS)

Work carried out for the wall without concurrence of drawing. Also, SBC test is not carried out for foundation strata.

45 101 20-11-‘13 Minor/Major

Bridge Location

Crash barrier/hard rails are missing / broken in many locations. This is dangerous for the traffic and road users.

46 102 02-12-‘13

57+976 RHS Patansai

Bridge

The centerline of highway and bridge are not matching. The issue was notified many times, NCR No-79 already issued, slab is cast, and Centerline is still not modified.

47 104 07-01-‘14 5+000 (LHS)

Unapproved steel Vaishnav Prime TMT steel is used in Raft without concurrence


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


from IE. Concreting of raft also done without concurrence.

48 105 18-01-‘14 22+800

Pipe Culvert

Pipe culvert at Ch. 22+800 is not constructed. Road work including WMM is completed at above location without construction of pipe culvert required as per Concession Agreement and concurred drawing.

49 108 27-01-‘14 27+100 (LHS)

Concreting of raft foundation is abruptly stopped due to shortage of cement. Due to this cold joint formed more than 50% area of raft which is structurally unsafe. Further concreting is resumed after more than 10 hours without concurrence of IE.

50 109 27-01-‘14

26+188 Bhogeshawari

Bridge Abutment A2

& Independent Return Wall.

Filter media behind abutment A2 is being laid without cleaning of weep holes.

51 111 30-01-‘14

26+188 (RHS)

Bhogeshwari Bridge

Major honey combing was observed in the bottom of I girder of P1-P2 span of Bhogeshwari bridge. This might have happened due to poor quality concrete and improper vibration.

52 112 30-01-‘14 38+245 to 39+380 (LHS)

DBM first layer had been laid from 38+245 to 39+380 (LHS) and diversion. During routine lab testing retained stability was found 67.42%, which is less than the required minimum stability (80% as per MoRTH).

53 113 30-01-‘14

22+705 to 22+900

(RHS) DBM

DBM is having very high marshall stability (2300 kg against the design of 1150 kg). The flow observed is 75 mm against the MoRTH value of 2-4 mm.

54 114 30-01-‘14

38+800 to 41+600 (LHS) and 22+700 to 22+900 (RHS)

Pneumatic Tyred Roller (PTR) has not been used for DBM compaction as per approved method statement.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


55 115 04-02-‘14 45+751 (LHS)

Structural cracks developed on the independent retaining wall (Panvel side) 3rd lift. This might have happened due to non-curing of structure.

56 116 04-02-‘14 60+984 (RHS)

Pipe culvert at above chainage is constructed without concurrence of working drawing. Also, it appears that pipe culvert top level is above Finished Road Level.

57 117 12-02-‘14 0+000 to 84+000

Drawing for applicable typical cross sections not yet submitted in spite of several reminders. This is very important during Project execution.

58 119 01-03-‘14 66+808 (RHS)

PCC and foundation is carried out without establishing/ confirming safe bearing capacity of foundation strata.

59 121 21-04-‘14

69+200 to 69+340 (RHS) & 69+800 to

69+900 (RHS).

Bituminous Concrete laid without constructing kerb.

60 122 21-04-‘14 58+040 (RHS)

(1) Kink formation due to abrupt merging of kerb near structure location. (2) Kerb line is out of alignment and not matching as per the latest concurred drawings.

61 123 21-04-‘14 61+330 to 61+410 (RHS)

Heaps of WMM mix dumped directly on the Bed of WMM first layer couple of days ago. The moisture from the WMM mix has already been dried up whereas it was required to be placed and rolled at a moisture content +1 or -2% of OMC.

62 124 21-04-‘14 44+155

Nigade (RHS)

Even after several reminders initial pile load test is not carried out. Further piling/ sub structure work is carried out at P2 and P4 locations without doing the initial and routine pile load tests.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


63 125 21-04-‘14 15+878 (LHS)

Even after several reminders initial pile load test is not carried out. Further piling/ substructure work is carried out at A1, P1, P3, P4, P5, P22, P23 and P24 locations without doing the initial and routine pile load tests.

64 127 21-04-‘14 70+227

Bituminous Concrete is laid on culvert slab and approach slab without laying mastic asphalt.

65 128 21-04-‘14 69+849

Bituminous Concrete is laid on culvert slab and approach slab without laying mastic asphalt.

66 129 21-04-‘14 57+976 (RHS)

Settlement of DBM and development of Cracks towards shoulder of freshly laid DBM in the approach to the minor bridge.

67 130 21-04-‘14 69+200 to 70+380 (RHS)

Surface Regularity Test not Carried Out Over DBM Surface - BC carried out in the above stretch without conducting the surface regularity test over the previously laid DBM surface.

68 131 21-04-‘14 26+188

Bhogeshwari bridge (RHS)

Abutment A2 Retaining Wall, it is observed that weep hole is not provided/cleaned before placing of filter media as per concurred drawing.

69 132 21-04-‘14 26+188

Bhogeshwari bridge (RHS)

Unapproved VAISHNAV 500 PRIME steel is used for reinforcement.

70 133 21-04-‘14 30+930 VUP Raft (RHS)

Unapproved SUN TMX and VAISHNAV 500 PRIME steel is used for reinforcement.

71 134 21-04-‘14 28+535 ROB R/w

(LHS)

Unapproved SUN TMX and VAISHNAV 500 PRIME steel is used for reinforcement.

72 135 21-04-‘14 71+000 to

71+050 (RHS)

Laying temperature of BC in the above stretch was checked and found 75.4° C, which is much below the required temperature as per MoRTH specifications.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


73 136 13-05-‘14

Kharpada Bridge G-1 Type 5/5 G. No-21 at Ch.

15+828

Compressive strength of M45 grade concrete found less than 45N/mm2 for 28 days strength testing (observed strength 39.56 N/mm2). The data recorded during test is enclosed.

74 137 13-05-‘14 Diversion at

Ch. 52+250 to 53+380

Diversion plan not submitted for IE’s concurrence. Diversion made at site is not as per IRC:SP:55 & Clause-112 of MoRTH specifications. Entry/Exit are not smooth.

75 138 13-05-‘14

Diversion at Ch.59+900 to

61+260


76 139 13-05-‘14

Diversion at Ch. 69+200 to

71+990.


77 140 23-05-‘14 Many locations

in Section-II

Excavated bituminous material spread over shoulder at many locations in section-II, which is a major environmental hazard. This was intimated through letter, site inspection etc many times. However, the same system is still being followed, which is highly un-acceptable.

78 141 26-05-‘14 46+500 (LHS). Shoulder not constructed and no Safety Barrier provided.

79 142 26-05-‘14 GSB at Ch. 52+500 to

52+750 (LHS)

GSB being spread haphazardly using JCB/Poclain and not with grader. The material used for GSB seems to be mixed with WMM material and not uniform. This is against the specifications and good engineering practice.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


80 143 26-05-‘14

WMM IInd Layer at Ch. 52+000 to

53+100 (LHS)

WMM IInd layer material directly dumped on the Ist layer and not being placed uniformly with paver and compacted immediately at OMC. This is against the specifications and Good Engineering Practice.

81 144 30-05-‘14 Kharpada

Bridge P5 Pier Cap

During site inspection it was observed that 16 mm, 12 mm, 10 mm, Vaishnav Prime TMT Steel is used for pier cap reinforcement. CPCC treatment not carried out properly.

82 145 30-05-‘14

Deck Slab of Nallah

diversion Ch. 4+930 to

4+950 (RHS)

Unapproved Vaishnav Prime TMT steel is used in pile Cap without source approval. CPCC of steel is not carried out properly.

83 146 30-05-‘14

Pier P3 Pile cap of

Kharpada Bridge

Unapproved steel Vaishnav Prime TMT was used in deck slab without source approval. CPCC of the steel is not carried out properly. Cover to the reinforcement not as per concurred drawing. Formwork, joint are not Leak proof and strong.

84 147 12-06-‘14

Pier Kharpada Bridge at Ch. 15+878- Pier P-9 to P-10

No safety arrangements are done at girder launching location. Gangway with handrail not constructed over pier cap. Ladder erected to inspect launching activity is very steep and without any hand rail. This is very dangerous and major safety hazard.

85 148 01-07-‘14

P11-P12 Girder No-25 & 26 Inner

Girder- Kharpada

Bridge

VAISHNAV 500 Prime steel is used for reinforcement. The above reinforcement steel source approve is not concurred by IE.

86 149 01-07-‘14

VUP Hamarapur at Ch. 23+460 (RHS) Raft

During site inspection of VUP Hamarapur raft, it is observed that VAISHNAV 500 Prime steel is used for reinforcement. The above reinforcement steel source approve is not concurred by IE.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


87 150 02-07-‘14 0+990 to

1+500

Road work carried out not as per concurred plan, profile and cross section drawings.

88 151 02-07-‘14 17+600 to

18+400


89 152 03-07-‘14 55+640 to

55+950


90 153 17-07-‘14

Box Culvert (Widening -

Service Road) at Ch. 41+960

(RHS)

“VAISHANV PRIME Steel 10 mm, 12mm, 16mm dia bar used in deck slab reinforcement. Vaishnav Prime steel source not concurred by IE.

91 154 18-07-‘14

Damage of DBM on New Carriageway

Ch. 61+090 to 61+150 (RHS)

DBM damaged badly on the stretch of new carriageway on RHS.

92 155 19-07-‘14

Development of many

Potholes/distress in BC in the stretch

Ch. 45+860 to 47+800 (LHS)

MCW

Several potholes/cracks have been developed in the newly laid BC at Ch. 45+870, 45+990, 46+470, 46+600, 46+760, 47+000, 47+040, 47+050, 47+250, 47+360 to 47+390, 47+10, 47+660.

93 156 22-08-‘14 Slab Culvert Ch. 77+997

(LHS)

Shoulder not constructed and no safety barrier provided (in spite of several reminders) at culvert.

94 157 22-08-‘14 Slab Culvert Ch. 78+167

(LHS)

No safety barrier provided (in spite of several reminders) and shoulder not constructed.

95 158 23-08-‘14

Deck Slab Reinforcement

VUP at Ch. 27+755 (LHS)

Un-approved “VAISHNAV PRIME TMT” steel is used in deck slab of VUP without source approval. CPCC treatment for steel is not carried out properly.

96 159 23-08-‘14 Box Culvert at Ch. 39+133

(LHS)

No safety barrier provided (in spite of several reminders) and shoulder not constructed.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


97 160 23-08-‘14 Median Drain at Ch. 80+700

to 81+100

(1) Work executed without concurrence of median drain drawings. (2) The cross chutes are constructed perpendicular to the highway which is not correct and not acceptable.

98 161 23-08-‘14

Development of Many

potholes/patches in the

newly laid BC at Ch. 69+200

to 71+800 (RHS)

Development of many potholes/patches in the newly laid BC at Ch. 69+200 to 69+380, 69+760 to 69+780, 69+965, 70+120 to 70+180, 70+570 & 71+040 and increasing day by day.

99 162 23-09-‘14

Pali Concrete Batching Plant at Ch. 66+545

to 66+599 (RHS)

PQC M(40) - The proportion of ingredients for PQC produced is different from mix design.

100 163 24-09-‘14 Badly

Distressed DBM locations

Badly Distressed DBM locations:

(1) 0+540 to 0+920 (LHS).

(2) 1+740 to 1+780 (LHS).

(3) 1+990 to 2+050 (RHS).

(4) 3+530 to 3+560 (LHS).

(5) 22+680 to 22+710 (RHS).

(6) 22+800 to 23+200 (RHS)

(7) 22+380 to 22+400 (RHS).

(8) 40+520 to 40+535 (LHS)

101 164 24-09-‘14 Badly



(1) 40+410 to 40+940 (LHS).

(2) 41+250 to 41+470 (LHS).

(3) 41+880 to 41+920 (LHS).

(4) 43+200 to 43+500 (LHS).

(5) 43+350 to 43+400 (RHS)

(6) 46+070 to 46+150 (RHS).

(7) 46+350 to 46+400 (RHS).

(8) 48+200 to 48+600 (LHS).


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


102 165 24-09-‘14 Badly



(1) 52+240 to 52+590 (RHS).

(2) 53+210 to 53+240 (RHS).

(3) 54+930 to 60+060 (RHS).

(4) 60+190 to 60+210 (RHS).

(5) 61+150 to 61+230 (RHS).

(6) 63+450 to 63+850 (LHS).

(7) 63+730 to 63+530 (RHS).

(8) 69+530 to 69+600 (LHS).

103 166 24-09-‘14 Badly



(1) 77+880 to 77+910 (RHS).

(2) 77+900 to 78+800 (LHS).

(3) 78+300 to 78+310 (RHS).

(4) 79+780 to 81+120 (LHS).

(5) 80+120 to 80+160 (RHS).

(6) 80+200 to 80+300 (RHS).

(7) 80+400 to 80+500 (RHS).

(8) 80+700 to 80+750 (RHS).

104 167 24-09-‘14 Badly



(1) 81+000 to 81+500 (RHS).

(2) 81+250 to 81+450 (LHS).

(3) 82+730 to 83+020 (RHS).

(4) 82+880 to 82+940 (LHS).

105 168 29-09-‘14

Box Culvert Retaining Wall At Ch. 51+690

(LHS)

Concreting of retaining wall raft (Panvel side LHS is carried out without vibrators (Compaction not carried out). Also Vaishanv Prime steel is used in reinforcement for which source is not concurred.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


106 169 09-10-‘14 Box culvert at Ch. 45+977

(LHS)

Crash barrier finished concrete surface is not in line and level and totally bulged. This might have happened due to improper support and formwork is not strong. Honeycombing also observed in retaining wall 4th lift.

107 170 15-11-‘14 Slab culvert at Ch. 82+583

(LHS)

Unapproved steel Vaishnav Prime TMT used in crash barrier without concurrence from IE.

108 171 15-11-‘14

Median Drain at Ch. 69+980 to 70+350 & 82+900 to 84+300

(1) Work executed without concurrence of design and drawing.

(2) Proper curing is not done, several cracks developed in median drain wall and bottom PCC.

109 172 15-11-‘14

Median Drain at Ch. 45+890 to 46+120, 46+300 to 46+610, 47+210 to 47+620 and 52+330 to 52+670-

(1) Work executed without concurrence of design and drawing.

(2) Proper curing is not done, several cracks developed in median drain wall and bottom PCC.

110 173 19-11-‘14

Retaining Wall Raft at Ch. 23+400 to

23+410 (RHS)

“Vaishnav Prime TMT-500” steel is used for raft reinforcement without source approval. CPCC has not been carried out properly.

111 174 19-11-‘14


23+490 (LHS)

“Vaishnav Prime TMT-500” steel is used for raft reinforcement without source approval.

112 175 26-11-‘14 Retaining Wall at Ch. 83+920

(RHS)

Concreting done with chute having height of fall more than 1.5 m and concrete is totally segregated. This is not acceptable as per MoRTH specifications.

113 176 09-12-‘14

Approaches to Pen ROB- broken &

missing railing on either

sides-safety hazard

Railing provided on either sides of the approaches to pen ROB are found to be broken/missing at many places resulting into a major safety hazard to the road users. Concessionaire have not done the barricading in


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


spite of several reminders.

114 177 09-12-‘14

Improper barricading at Ch. 22+600 to

23+250 (LHS)- safety

hazard

Deep road cutting on LHS improper and non-continuous barricading is provided causing safety hazard to the road users. Concessionaire have not provided crash barrier in spite of several reminders.

115 178 15-12-‘14


23+530 (RHS)

In spite of availability of concrete pump, concreting of raft was carried out using chute. Due to this, concrete is segregated and honey-combing developed. Reinforcement also not covered with concrete.

116 179 22-12-‘14

DBM top Level Checking

Ch. 40+220 to 40+780 (RHS) - RFI No. 6556 Ch. 51+920 to 52+090 (RHS) - RFI No. 22251. Ch. 57+360 to 57+510 (RHS) - RFI No. 22438.

With reference to above mentioned RFI’s, levels of DBM top surface were checked and found beyond permissible limits. These were intimated for rectification vide Our letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL / 2014 / 2243 dated. 28-04-2014 but no rectification is carried out till date.

117 180 24-12-‘14

Section-I-Non Calibration of

Lab Equipments and Plant

Due date of machinery and plant calibration are finished and they are not re-calibrated.

118 181 24-01-‘15

Box Culvert Retaining wall

Raft at Ch. 51+690 (RHS).

Following deficiencies observed in formwork and reinforcement of foundation:

(1) Bottom cover is 20 mm only.

(2) Shuttering is not provided on One side.

(3) Totally waterlogged.

(4) Reinforcement lapping is not provided.

(5) Vaishnav Prime steel is used. (This source was never concurred).

In spite of above deficiencies, concreting was carried out.


Sl No.

NCR No

Date Chainage

& Side


on


119 182 09-02-‘15 Pipe Culvert at

Ch. 50+808 (RHS)

NP4 pipes laid is damaged

and reinforcement of pipe

also exposed near the joint.

Gap between jointing of

pipe is not as per

specification and finishing at

jointed surface is not in

consistence with exterior

and interior surface at pipe.

Honey combing also

observed in head wall of

pipe culvert. This is not

acceptable. This issue was

already discussed with EPC

Contractor and PMC.

120 183 26-02-‘15 Box Culvert at Ch. 66+808

(RHS)

(1) Construction joint for

the wall not done as

per specifications.

(2) Vaishanv Prime steel

used for both wall and

slab.

(3) Reinforcement steel

completely corroded

and not cleaned.

(4) Cover to reinforcement

is 30mm only which is

less than 50 mm.

121 184 28-02-‘15 Ch. 66+850 to 66+870 (LHS)

DLC not done

properly. The DLC

surface is loose and

having undulations.

Table 4.3 Details of Site Inspection Notes.

Inspection Note No Date

Site Inspection No-1 22-02-2012 & 29-02-2012

Site Inspection No-2 15-03-2012








Inspection Note No Date







































Table 4.4. Details of Audit Reports

Table 4.5 Details of Tests Carried Out (Nos)

Material Test Reference Up to Last

Month

During the

Month

Cumulative Including this Month

Cumulative

Failed

Cumulative Nos

Witnessed by IE

Earthwork in Embankment

(a) Sand Content IS:2720 (Part-4) 2153 0 2153 0 472

(b) Liquid Limit Test IS:2720 (Part-5) 2152 0 2152 0 472

(c ) Plasticity Test IS:2720 (Part-5) 2152 0 2152 0 472

(d) Lab. Density test IS:2720 (Part-8) 2152 0 2152 0 472

(f) Moisture content test IS:2720 (Part-2) 3398 153 3551 0 355

(g) Field Density by sand replacement method

IS:2720 (Part-28) 4769 465 5234 5 503

Subgrade

(a) Sand Content IS:2720 (Part-4) 808 12 820 0 88


(c) Plasticity Test IS:2720 (Part-5) 808 12 820 0 88

(d) Lab. Dry Density IS:2720 (Part-8) 808 12 820 0 88

(f) Moisture content test IS:2720 (Part-2) 3668 42 3710 0 373

(g) CBR Test IS:2720 (Part-16) 399 13 412 0 50

(h) Field Density by sand replacement method

IS:2720 (Part-28) 4834 150 4984 17 501

Granular Subbase

(a) Gradation IS 2386 (Part-1) 1420 9 1429 0 155


(c) Plasticity Test IS:2720 (Part-5) 1402 9 1411 0 147

(d) Moisture content Prior to compaction

IS: 2720 ( Part-2) 2533 4 2537 0 260

(e) CBR test IS:2720 (Part-16) 2 0 2 0 1

(f)Density of compacted layer

IS:2720 (Part-28) 3677 27 3704 1 376

(g) Water absorption IS: 2386 ( part-3) 16 0 16 0 2

(h) 10% Fines BS:812 (Part-III) 6 0 6 0 2

Wet Mix Macadam (Crushed Stone Aggregates)

(a) Gradation IS 2386 (Part-1) 2173 3 2176 0 226

(b) Aggregate Impact value

IS:2386 (Part-4) 1925 2 1927 0 196

(c) Water Absorption IS: 2386 ( Part-3) 26 0 26 0 14

(d) Flakiness and Elongation Index

IS: 2386 (Part-1) 1653 2 1655 0 173

(e) Liquid Limit Test IS:2720 (Part-5) 1969 2 1971 0 202

(f) Plasticity Test IS:2720 (Part-5) 1955 2 1957 0 202

(g ) Field Density by sand replace method

IS:2720 (Part-28) 2892 6 2898 7 291

Ordinary Portland Cement

(a) Fineness

277 3 280 0 52

(b) Initial Setting time 292 3 295 0 42

(c) Final Setting time 292 3 295 0 42

(d) Compressive Strength

3 Days 288 3 291 0 41

7 Days 285 3 288 0 41

28 Days 281 1 282 0 40

Sl. No Audit Report No Date of Audit

1 Audit Report No-1 13-12-2012

2 Audit Report No-2 14-12-2012



Month

During the

Month


Cumulative

Failed

Cumulative Nos

Witnessed by IE

(e) Chemical Requirements

5 0 5 0 -

Coarse Aggregates

(a) Gradation Individual & All in One Agg.

IS:383 and MORT&H

Table1000-1 4367 54 4421 0 465

(b) Water absorption IS:2386 (Part3) 188 0 188 0 20

(c) Specific gravity IS:2386 (Part3) 159 0 159 0 17

(d)Los Angeles abrasion value

IS:2386 (Part4) 107 0 107 0 10

(e) Aggregate Impact value

837 4 841 0 100

(f) Flakiness and Elongation Index

IS:2386 (Part-1) 772 4 776 0 89

(g) Soundness IS:2386 (Part5) 14 0 14 0 0

(h)Alkali-aggregate reactivity

IS:2386 (Part7) 11 0 11 0 0

Fine Aggregates

(a) Gradation IS:383 and

MORT&H Table 1000-1

2219 18 2237 0 419

(b) Water absorption IS:2386 (Part3) 150 0 150 0 15

(c) Specific gravity IS:2386 (Part3) 132 0 132 0 15

(d) Fineness Modulus Section 1008 of

MORT&H 2150 18 2168 0 419

Water Chemical Tests

(a) Organic matter

10 0 10 0 -

(b) Inorganic matter 10 0 10 0 -

(c) Sulphates(as So4) 22 0 22 0 2

(d) Suspended matter 10 0 10 0 -

(e) Chlorides(as Cl) 22 0 22 0 2

(f) pH Value 22 0 22 0 2

Admixtures

(a) Dry material content

16 0 16 0 -

(b) Ash content 16 0 16 0 -

(c) Relative Density 16 0 16 0 -

(d) Chloride ion content 16 0 16 0 -

(e) pH value 16 0 16 0 -

Concrete

(a)Compressive/ Flexural Strength

Section 900 and Section 1700 of

MORT&H IS:516 - - - - -

For M-15 Grade 7 Days 1354 2 1356 1 384

28 Days 1940 0 1940 0 550

For M-20 Grade 7 Days 2031 17 2048 2 568

28 Days 3454 9 3463 3 648

For M-25 Grade 7 Days 790 2 792 1 154

28 Days 1203 2 1205 1 348

For M-30 Grade 7 Days 998 2 1000 1 204

28 Days 2269 0 2269 2 450

For M-35 Grade 7 Days 721 0 721 0 133

28 Days 1157 0 1157 5 326

For M-40 Grade (Str.) 7 Days 318 1 319 2 36

28 Days 326 0 326 0 52

For M-20 Grade Kerb 7 Days 328 0 328 1 51

28 Days 487 0 487 0 99

For M-35 Kharpada 7 Days 88 0 88 0 8

28 Days 246 0 246 0 25

For M-40 Kharpada 7 Days 21 0 21 0 2

28 Days 76 0 76 0 7

For M-45 Girder 7 Days 32 0 32 1 5



Month

During the

Month


Cumulative

Failed

Cumulative Nos

Witnessed by IE

28 Days 95 0 95 3 15

For PQC 7 Days 24 0 24 0 5

28 Days 24 0 24 0 5

For DLC

9 1 10 0 5

Reinforcing Steel

(a) Chemical Analysis

IS:1786-1985 IS:1608-1972 IS:226-1975 IS:1599-1974

IS:2770 (Part 1)-1967

- - - - -

% of Carbon 40 0 40 0 0

% of Sulphur 40 0 40 0 0

% of Phosphorus 40 0 40 0 0

(b) Nominal Mass 298 0 298 0 0

(c) 0.2 %Proof Stress 299 0 299 0 0

(d) Tensile Strength 299 0 299 0 0

(e) Elongation % 299 0 299 0 0

(g) Bend Test 299 0 299 0 0

(h) Rebend Test 299 0 299 0 0

NP4 class precast 1000mm dia pipe

Physical test IS: 458 28 0 28 0 1

NP4 class precast 1200mm dia pipe

Physical test

28 0 28 0 1

Prime Coat (Bituminous Emulsion)

Rate of Application IS:8887 &

MORT&H CI.502 891 0 891 0 90

Track Coat (Bituminous Emulsion)

Rate of Application IS:8887 &

MORT&H CI.503 923 0 923 0 92

Dense Bituminous Macadam

(a) Quality of Binder (VG-30)

IS:73 - - - - -

(i) Presentation IS:73 65 0 65 0 30

(ii) Softening Point IS:73 65 0 65 0 30

(iii) Ductility IS:73 65 0 65 0 7

(iv) Flash and Fire Point IS:73 40 0 40 0 5

(b) Aggregate Impact Value

IS:2386 (Part-4)

879 0 879 0 88

(c) Los Angeles Abrasion test

17 0 17 0 7

(d) Flakiness and Elongation Index

IS:2386 (Part-1) 879 0 879 0 88

(e) Stripping Value IS:6241 and

AASTHO-T182 25 0 25 0 3

(f) Water Absorption of Aggregated

2 0 2 0 1

(g) Soundness I670S:2386 (Part-

5) 2 0 2 0 0

(h) Grading MORT&H Tables 500.9

MORT&H 265 0 265 0 48

(i) Bitumen Content % 265 0 265 0 48

(j) Density of Compacted layer % by 100mm Dia core

1758 0 1758 0 283

(k) Stability of Mix ASTM D 1559 and As per MORT&H Tables 500-11

265 0 265 2 36

(l) Flow of Mix 265 0 265 0 36



Month

During the

Month


Cumulative

Failed

Cumulative Nos

Witnessed by IE

(m) Water sensitivity of Mix

4 0 4 1 1

Bituminous Concrete

(a) Aggregate Impact value

IS:2386 (Part-4) 32 0 32 0 4

(b) Flakiness and Elongation Index

IS:2386 (Part-1) 32 0 32 0 4

(c) Stripping value IS: 6241

and AASTHO T- 182

1 0 1 0 1

(d) Grading MORT&H Table 500.9

MORT&H 10 0 10 0 3

(e) Bitumen Content % 10 0 10 0 4

(f) Density of Compacted layer % by 100mmDia core

163 0 163 0 18

(g) Stability of Mix ASTM D 1559 and

As per MORT&H Table

500-11

10 0 10 0 4

(h) Flow of Mix 10 0 10 0 4

(i) Water Sensitivity of mix

1 0 1 0 1

It has been observed that the following equipments which are required as per MoRTH norms

are not available in the laboratory:

Section-I:

Sl. No

Name of Equipment Capacity Required (as per MoRTH )

Remarks

1 Hydro Meter 1.2 gram per/CC 1 No -

2 Compression Testing

Machine(CTM) Standard 1 No -

3 Marshall Mould Testing Machine (Stability Test)

Standard 1 No -

4 Viscosity Machine for Emulsion

Standard 1 No -

5 Thin Film oven Standard 1 No -

6 High Speed Stirrer Standard 1 No -

7 Hot Plates 200 dia (1500W) 1500w 1 No -

8 Kinematic Viscometer Standard 1 No -

9 Absolute Viscometer Standard 1 No -

10 Specific Gravity Bottle 25 ml 2 Nos -

11 Sand Equivalent Apparatus Standard 1 No -


Section-II:

* Concessionaire has been advised many times to procure above missing items for their

laboratory.

Sl. No

Name of Equipment Capacity Required (as per

MORTH)

Remarks

1 Hydro Meter 1.2 gram per/CC 1 No -

2 Stop watch 0.5 sec accuracy 1 No -

3 UCS Testing Machine Standard 1 No -

4 Aggregate Crushing Value Standard 1 No -

5 10% Fines Value Standard 1 No -

6 Loss Angeles Abbrassion Value

Standard 1 No Break down

7 Wire Basket for WA/SP GR 2.36 mm Mesh 1 No Not in order

8 DLC Hammer (chipper) 15 cm cube

Assemble 1 No Break down

9 Water Testing Kit Standard 1 No -

10 GMM Test Vaccune Pump

with Glass Flask 2 lit 1 No -

11 Ductility Test Standard 1 No -

12 Viscosity Machine for Emulsion

Standard 1 No -

13 Thin Film oven Standard 1 No -

14 High Speed Stirrer Standard 1 No -

15 Kinematic Viscometer Standard 1 No -

16 Absolute Viscometer Standard 1 No -

17 Specific Gravity Bottle 25 ml 2 Nos -

18 Sand Equivalent Apparatus Standard 1 No -


5.0 TRAFFIC & SAFETY

5.1 Safety Issues

(1) There is an urgent need to provide all the required traffic control & safety

devices viz., signs, delineators, blinkers, barriers, etc. at the work sites as per

relevant standards viz, NHAI-Technical Specifications, IRC-SP-55 & IRC-SP-84

wherever lapses are observed.

(2) All ‘Working Zone’ must be provided with adequate lateral & longitudinal buffer

clearances as per IRC-SP-55.

(3) Workers at site must be provided with necessary PPE viz., Safety Shoe, Gloves,

Jackets, etc.

(4) Traffic Diversions are potential accident spots since vehicles approach the

diversions at high speeds. Appropriate temporary signs, delineators, blinkers,

New Jersey barriers & barricades must be provided at the diversions and at

proper locations to guide the vehicles to safety before passing by the work

zones.

(5) The Concessionaire have been advised to comply the deficiencies observed in

the traffic safety measures taken.

(6) Traffic diversions are potential accident spots during construction period.

Necessary signs to be provided at such locations. Many of the diversions

provided at site are sharp and not with proper geometry which leads to

accidents. Many letters are issued to Concessionaire to rectify the safety issues

at site.

5.2 Accident data

The accident data is given in Appendix-I.

5.3 Maintenance of Existing Highway

Concessionaire is being advised to maintain the existing highway to traffic-worthy

condition. Site Inspection notes / letters are issued to Concessionaire in this regard.

Many potholes / patches were observed on the Project Highway. Further, advices

were given to the Concessionaire to maintain the hand rail of structures, vents of

structures etc. But, The Concessionaire is not maintaining the Project highway

properly in spite of several reminders.

Concession Agreement, Vol-I, Clause-12.2 specifies that “During the construction

period the Concessionaire shall maintain, at its cost, the existing lane(s) of the

Project Highways so that the traffic worthiness and safety thereof are at no time


materially inferior as compared to their condition 7 (Seven) days prior to the date of

this Agreement, and shall undertake the necessary repair and maintenance works for

this purpose; provided that the Concessionaire may, at its cost, interrupt and divert

the flow of traffic if such interruption and diversion is necessary for the efficient

progress of Construction Works and conforms to Good Industry Practice; provided

further that such interruption and diversion shall be undertaken by the

Concessionaire only with the prior written approval of the Independent Engineer

which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the avoidance of doubt, it is

agreed that the Concessionaire shall at all times be responsible for ensuring safe

operation of the Project Highway.”


6.0 CONTRACTUAL ISSUES

6.1 Change of Scope

The Details of Change of Scope proposals considered are given in Table 6.1. The Change of

Scope Proposal rejected by Independent Engineer are given in Table 6.2.

Table 6.1 Details of Change of Scope Proposals considered:

Sl No


Appr. Cost Implication

(Rs. Crores)

Status


(-) 28.30** Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities in proper order so far.


(+) 3.449* Clarifications are yet to be submitted by Concessionaire. Change of Scope is pending at NHAI HQ.

3 Mitigation Measures in Karnala Bird Sanctuary Area.

(+) 55.88 **

NHAI has approved in principle. Concessionaire was advised to submit detailed proposal. However, NBWL’s clearance not yet obtained.

4 Shifting the location of Jite PUP (from Ch. 18+240 to 18+700)

Nil NHAI has approved this Change of Scope with no Financial implication


- Concessionaire is advised to submit clarifications.


-


7 Underpasses in Pen City (+) 8.38 * Approved in principle by NHAI.

8 Change in number of spans of ROB at Pen Ch. 28+283

(+) 14.25 * Recommended to NHAI. Clarifications also sent to NHAI. Pending with NHAI.

9 Increase in length of Wadkhal Bypass by 805m

(+) 0.81 * Approved in principle by NHAI.

10 Increase in Span for Structure at Ch. 38+336 and Ch. 43+133

(+) 0.6663 * Change of Scope proposal recommended to NHAI. Clarifications submitted to NHAI. Pending with NHAI, HQ.


(+) 2.52 * Approved in principle by NHAI.

12 Increase in Length of Service Road

Nil Recommended to NHAI. Clarifications submitted to NHAI. Pending with NHAI, RO.

13 Exit/entry Ramps at the Start and End of Service Road

- Concessionaire yet to submit the compliances.

* Excluding overhead cost claimed by Concessionaire.

** Including Overhead Cost.

Table 6.2 Details of Change of Scope Proposals Rejected by Independent Engineer

Sl No



(Rs. Crores)

Status

1 Nallah diversion through box (+) 7.6147 * Sufficient land available for diversion of


Sl No



(Rs. Crores)

Status

culvert at Ch. 4+700 to 4+800 and 5+700 to 5+800.

Nallah. Accordingly, Change of Scope is not admissible.

2 Retaining wall at Ch. 16+720 to 16+870 (LHS & 23+430 to 23+480 (LHS)

(+) 1.07 * In both the stretches the ROW available is 60m. Hence Change of Scope is not admissible.

3 Retaining Wall at Ch. 23+400 to 23+640 (RHS)

(+) 1.95 *

Concessionaire has not followed the procedures for Change of Scope. CIDCO water pipeline at this location was already buried in embankment without any protection measures. Thus, Change of scope not admissible.

4 Wadkhal Bypass by changing ROB to RUB

(+) 20.63 Concessionaire is advised to construct ROB as per provisions of Concession Agreement.

5 Reconstruction of Damaged Slab culvert at Ch 39+030 & 39+133

(+) 0.265 * Change of scope not admissible as it comes under rehabilitation.

6

Additional VUP on both ends of Amba Bridge. (Pali Junction at Ch. 58+660 and Roha/ Alibaug Junction at Ch. 58+960)

(+) 23.38 * NHAI has rejected the proposal and advised Concessionaire to proceed as per Concession Agreement.

7

Difference in width of median for approach to Underpasses / Flyovers / ROB etc Type - X Section

- Rejected as it is not admissible as per Concession Agreement provisions

8 Concrete pavement below RUB at Ch. 56+560 (Nagothane)

- Rejected as it is required as per site conditions and vertical clearance requirements.

* Excluding overhead cost.

Our records show that Concessionaire has not submitted necessary clarifications /details

for the following Changes of Scope in spite of several reminders:

Sl No


Status


Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities in proper order so far.


Clarifications are yet to be submitted by Concessionaire.


Concessionaire is advised to submit clarifications.



5 Underpasses in Pen City Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.


Approved in principle by NHAI. Concessionaire has not submitted detailed quantities so far.


Sl No


Status

7 Exit/Entry Ramps at Start and End of Service road

Compliance to the observations not yet submitted.

6.2 Project Milestones

Project Milestone - I

The Concessionaire has to achieve Project Milestone - I by 19-12-2012 as per

Schedule - G of the Concession Agreement. They have requested/applied for shifting

the date of Project Milestone - I for a period of 135 days. The Independent Engineer

advised the Concessionaire to submit the details of actual progress (both Physical &

Financial) with substantiating supporting details to enable Independent Engineer to

critically analyse the case.

Concession Agreement, Clause-13.4, Specify that ”Without prejudice to the provision

of Clause 12.4.2 if the Concessionaire does not achieve any of Project Milestone or

the Independent Engineer shall have reasonably determined that the rate of Progress

of Construction works is such that Four-Laning is not likely to be achieved by the

Scheduled Four-laning date, it shall notify the Concessionaire to this effect, and the

Concessionaire shall, within 15 (fifteen) days of such notice, by a communication

inform the Independent Engineer in reasonable detail about the steps it proposes to

take to expedite Progress and the period within which it shall achieve the Project

Completion Date”.

Concession Agreement Clause-12.4.2 Specify that “The Concessionaire shall construct

the Project Highway in accordance with the Project completion Schedule set forth in

Schedule-G. In the invent that the Concessionaire fails to achieve any Project

Milestone within the period of 90 (Ninety) days from the date set forth for such

Milestone in Schedule-G, unless such failure has occurred due to force Majeure or for

reasons solely attributable to the Authority, it shall pay Damages to the Authority in a

Sum calculated at the rate of 0.1% (zero point of one per cent) of the amount of

Performance Security for delay of each day until such Milestones is achieved;

provided that if any or all project milestone or the scheduled four-Laning Date are

extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, the date set forth in

Schedule-G shall be deemed to be modified accordingly and the Provisions of this

Agreement shall apply as if schedule-G has been amended as above; provided further

that in the event Project Completion Date is achieved on or before the scheduled

Four- Laning, date the Damage paid under this Clause- 12.4.2 shall be refunded by

the Authority to the Concessionaire, but without any interest thereon. For the

avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that recovery of Damage under this Clause-12.4.2


shall be without prejudice to the right of the Authority under this Agreement

including the right of Termination thereof.”

Independent Engineer has critically assessed the allowable Extension of Time (EOT)

for achieving Milestone-1. Accordingly, it was observed that the allowable Extension

of Time (EOT) due to various issues such as delayed handing over of land, delay in

approval of GAD for ROB’s, delay in shifting of various utilities etc. is assessed to be

152 days (That is upto 20-05-2013). However, Concessionaire requested for

Extension of Time, for 135 days from stipulated Milestone -1 date (That is upto 03-

05-2013). Accordingly, Independent Engineer has recommended the Extension of

Time upto 03-05-2013, based on following conditions to be agreed by

Concessionaire.

(a) Concessionaire will not be eligible for any extension of Concession Period on

account of extension of Milestone No-1.

(b) Concessionaire will complete the Milestone No-1 by 03-05-2013 (135 days from

scheduled Milestone No-1 date).

(c) No damages for delay in handing over of land/approval of estimate for utility

shifting/Force Majeure during the period upto extended period of Milestone No-1

(that is upto 03-05-2013) will be claimed as the Extension of Time (EOT)

granted is mutually agreeable to the Concessionaire.

(d) The additional machineries and manpower as promised will be mobilized

immediately.

(e) Further scheduled completion milestone dates including final completion will not

get extended due to extension of Milestone No-1 as provided in schedule ‘G’ of

the Concession Agreement.

While recommending Extension of Time for Milestone no-1, Independent Engineer

has critically assessed and concluded that Concessionaire is eligible for 152 days

extension (That is upto 20-05-2013). However, Concessionaire has requested for

Extension of Time for 135 days only which fall on 03-05-2013. The Milestone no-1

was achieved on 01-05-2013 that is 133rd day from Schedule milestone no-1 date,

which was within the recommended period of Extension of Time. Executive

committee of NHAI has approved EOT upto 01-05’2013

Project Milestone - II

The Concessionaire has to achieve Project Milestone-II by 19-12-2013 as per

Schedule-G of the Concession Agreement. Concessionaire vide their letter no.

SPITPL/P-NHAI/2013-14/2471 dt 28-01-’14 has claimed and informed NHAI that they

have achieved Milestone-II by 19-12-’13 considering the land made available for


construction. Independent Engineer has reviewed and commented vide letter

no. PIP/IE/NHAI/2014/2164 dt. 03-04-2014. NHAI has advised Concessionaire to

submit undertaking specifying unconditional waiver. In the modified revised

construction programme for Project completion submitted by Concessionaire, they

have indicated that they will achieve Milestone-II by August 2015. The executive

committee of NHAI has approved Extension of Time to achieve Milestone - II upto

31-10-2015.


Concessionaire did not achieve the Four Laning (Project Completion) as stipulated in

Concession Agreement. Concessionaire has cited various issues such as delay in

handing over of encumbrance - free land, utility shifting, non - removal of

encroachments etc. Concessionaire has requested Extension of Time (EOT) for 898

days (That means upto 30 Nov 2016). It is to be re- iterated that Concessionaire

should also continue to initiate pro-active role in land acquisition and removal of

encumbrances. Further, in the review meeting by Member (PPP) at NHAI Hq on 31-

10-‘14, it was advised to re-visit the EOT issue and submit revised recommendations

alongwith draft supplementary agreement. Accordingly, Independent Engineer

critically analysed various aspects of the issues related to Four Laning (Project

Completion) and following recommendations were made:

(a) The status and Independent Engineer’s recommendations for various

Milestones are given below :

Project Milestone Dates specified

in CA Revised dates

Milestone - I (25% Physical Progress and 25% Financial Progress)

19-12-2012 Already achieved on 01-05-2013

Milestone - II (65% Physical Progress and 65% Financial Progress )

19-12-2013 31-10-2015

Four-Laning (except Eco-Sensitive zone) 16-06-2014 31-03-2016

Completion of the Eco-Sensitive Zone provided land is made available within three months from date of this

Supplementary Agreement

16-06-2014 30-06-2016

(b) The Concessionaire has not been able to achieve completion of Four-Laning on

scheduled date (16-06-2014) but the delay is not solely attributable to the

Authority. However, land fronts are hindered at some locations due to

requirement of forest diversion, missing guts, pending valuation of structures,

variation in the area notified and acquired, non-payment of existing structures

on acquired land, re-measurements, non-payment for land acquired, area falls

in the ROW of 60m but not notified under 3A/3D etc., lack of sufficient support


from revenue authorities for finalisation of joint measurement of disputed land

etc. It may be noted that the delay is beyond the control of Authority /

Concessionaire. Accordingly, it is recommended that a Supplementary

Agreement may be executed. Draft Supplementary Agreement in this regard

was submitted to NHAI.

(c) Concessionaire may be instructed to submit corrected and detailed catch-up

programme considering the Extension of Time (EOT) upto 31-03-2016.

(d) Both the parties ie, NHAI and Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd.

hereby mutually waive off all damages/penalties payable on account of not

fulfilling conditions precedent as per Articles 4, 10, 35 of Concession Agreement

or any other provision of the Concession Agreement.

(e) The Concessionaire also undertakes to provide all the necessary assistance to

Authority in terms of equipments, machineries, manpower, construction

materials etc. for:

(i) Getting the encroachments cleared from the project site.

(ii) Taking over the project sections and starting the construction work

immediately on Project sections where encroachments are removed or

land acquisition/possession is handed over and complete the same within

the extended period.

(f) The Concessionaire also agrees to maintain the project highway in traffic

worthy condition as per provisions in the Concession Agreement.

Concessionaire has recently submitted detailed construction programme showing

completion of stretch from 0+000 to 20+100 by June ’16 and stretch from 20+100

to 84+600 by March ’16. Independent Engineer has recommended the same to NHAI

for approval alongwith EOT. The executive committee of NHAI has approved

Extension of Time upto 31-03-2016 (Except Eco-Sensitive Zone).

6.3 Land Acquisition issue between Balganga Major Bridge (Ch. 20+144) and

Balivali Minor Bridge (Ch. 20+754):

As per Concession Agreement, Vol-II, Schedule-B, Appendix B1, page no-41A, two

lane new bridge for Balganga river at Ch 20+144 has to be constructed on RHS and

as per Appendix B2, page no-41B, two-lane new bridge has to be constructed on LHS

for Balivali river at Ch. 20+754. Balganga bridge is in advanced stage of construction

and Balivali bridge has almost completed. The land acquisition is done on the right

side between the above two bridges and thus the highway portion between two

bridges cannot be constructed.


6.4 Un-approved Steel in use:

Conditional Source approval for steel from M/s Shree Vaishnav Alloys Pvt. Ltd was

concurred on 01-05-’12 based on the condition that the challans for billets (from

main and major producers) and Manufacturer Test Certificate (MTC) will be

submitted. Meanwhile NHAI informed that the steel shall be procured from main and

major producers only as per IRC: SP: 84-2009 which are SAIL, IRNL, TATA, ESSAR,

ISPAT, JSW Steel Ltd and JSL. No re- rolled steel shall be permitted in NHAI works.

In some of the minor bridges, Concessionaire has used Sangam TMT, SUN TMT etc.

also which were notified to the Concessionaire through various NCR’s, Site Inspection

Reports, letters etc. Concessionaire was strictly advised to use steel produced from

main and major producers only as per NHAI’s circulars. The source approval for M/s

Shree Vaishanav Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was withdrawn with affect from 25-07-’13. Even

after withdrawing concurrence, Concessionaire has been using un-approved steel in

many structures. Engineer has issued letter to Concessionaire warning them that IE

will be constrained to initiate necessary punitive action as per the provisions of

Concession Agreement without any further notice.

6.5 Non construction of Exit/Entry Ramps for Service Road:

Due to non-availability of additional land for constructing the entry/exit ramps for

service road as stipulated in IRC: SP : 84-2010, it was proposed to construct tapers

at such locations. NHAI has made queries on this proposal and Concessionaire is yet

to comply with the queries including the approximate cost implication. The issue is

still pending with the Concessionaire.


7.0 CRITICAL ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(1) Land Acquisition: As per the Concession Agreement, NHAI shall make best efforts

to procure and grant, no later than 90 days from the Appointed Date, the Right of

Way to the Concessionaire in respect of all land included in the Appendix. NHAI may

speed up further land acquisition process.

(2) Very Slow Progress of RE Wall Works: Though Concessionaire has initiated

some RE wall works, it is completely stopped. This will be critical activity on the

Project. Concessionaire should immediately pursue this matter. Out of the total 26

underpasses not even single underpass structure and its approaches is completed.

(3) Non-Removal of Encumbrances : NHAI has issued notice under section 26 of the

Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 to unauthorized occupants

in some of the villages. Police support is sought. Encroachments are removed in

Kollad, Pui, Khamb, Varas gaon villages. However, some buildings in other villages

are yet to be removed for want of payment, valuation etc. Concessionaire has not

submitted the programme for encroachment removal/building removal in spite of

several reminders.

Concession Agreement, Clause 5.1.4 (e) specifies that “Concessionaire should make

reasonable efforts to facilitate the acquisition of land required for the purpose of the

Agreement”. Also, Concession Agreement, Clause 4.1.4 specifies that “Each party

shall make all reasonable endeavours to satisfy the conditions precedent within the

time stipulated and shall provide the other party with such reasonable cooperation as

may be required to assist that party in satisfying the conditions precedent for which

that party is responsible”.

(4) Very Slow Progress of shifting of Electrical Posts and Lines, MJP Water

Pipe Lines by Concessionaire : The shifting of electrical poles and lines is very

slow. Hardly any crossing is done so far. The shifting of MJP water pipeline is very

slow. Concessionaire should speed up these activities.

(5) Eco-Sensitive Zone / Forest Land: Approval of Forest land except Ch. 0+000 to

20+100 issued by NHAI vide letter No. NHAI/ PIU/ PANVEL/ PI/ SPITPL/ Forest/

2013/ 1201 dt. 23-08-’13. The approval for the forest land between Ch. 0 + 000 to

20+100 is still pending. This portion comes under Eco-sensitive zone. Approval for

non core area (length 16.6 km) of Karnala Bird Sanctuary has been obtained.

However, PCCF Maharashtra has asked to obtain NGT approval. Proposal for

obtaining NBWL approval for core area (3.5 Km) has been resubmitted to NBWL for

reconsideration. Additional land of 1.3 Ha affecting 300m length in Sukheli Khind

need to be approved by MoEF.


(6) Very Slow Progress of Structure Works: The progress of structures (especially,

major bridges, flyovers and ROB’s) is very slow. Concessionaire should improve the

progress of structures. The overall progress so far is 35% only.

(7) Pavement Distress at many Locations: During the rainy seasons of year 2013

and 2014, the newly laid DBM and BC has distressed at many locations. Many

pothole/patch were observed. The Concessionaire was advised to remove such

distressed layer fully to appreciable length and relay with new materials. Also,

Concessionaire is advised to investigate in detail on such recurring problems and

submit detailed report. Independent Engineer has insisted Concessionaire to follow

good engineering practices during pavement construction. It has been reminded

many times the importance of constructing kerb before taking up bituminous works,

use of PTR for DBM layer, constructing median drain and chutes, proper drainage

arrangements during construction, temperature control etc.

(8) Very Slow Progress of Works :

(a) In spite of prevailing good working season, absolutely no work is in progress in both

sections. It appears that the works are held up for want of fund cement, bitumen,

diesel, manpower, machinery and other resources. The physical progress during

August ’14 to February ‘15 are 0.01%, 0.04%, 0.03%, 0.02%, 0.0%, 0.00% and

0.02% respectively. The length of highway works completed(m) during these months

are given below:

Description Aug.’14 Sept.’14 Oct.’14 Nov.’14 Dec.’14 Jan.’14 Feb.’15

Clearing & Grubbing 0 0 0 0 0 310 0

Embankment 0 0 0 0 0 350 160

Subgrade 0 0 0 288 0 260 240

Granular Sub base (GSB) 0 0 0 30 0 70 250

Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM)

0 0 60 0 0 0 0

Bituminous Concrete (BC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(b) It has also been observed that at following underpass locations works can

start/continue:

Sl No Chainage Description Concessionaire’s Comments Our Comments

1 25+860

Khopoli VUP

Panvel

approach

CIDCO pipeline is the major

hurdle: CIDCO pipeline on LHS is

not yet removed by the

authority. There is still land

acquisition problem which is not

sorted out in totally.

CIDCO pipeline will not

affect approach

construction. There is

absolutely no problem to

construct the

approaches.


(c) The works for Rest area, busbays, truck laybyes etc. are not yet started.

(d) Independent Engineer’s review on the progress of work on highway alongwith land

availability shows that at following locations, highway works should have been in

progress.

Sl No

Chainage Side

Length (Km)

Remarks From To

1 0+400 1+000 B/S 600 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 2 1+500 4+300 B/S 2,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 3 5+500 6+800 B/S 1,300 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 4 21+300 23+500 RHS 2,200 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 5 22+950 23+350 LHS 400 Slow Progress 6 31+000 31+600 B/S 600 Work yet to be started 7 40+100 41+900 B/S 1,800 BC can be done after rectification of distressed DBM 8 51+500 51+900 LHS 400 WMM work still not completed 9 59+400 60+300 LHS 900 No work 10 59+700 59+900 RHS 200 Earthwork is not completed 11 60+800 61+700 LHS 900 No work 12 62+400 63+100 LHS 700 No work

2 30+930

Wadkhal VUP

Indapur

approach

Land problem and the


available for construction

activity.


constructing the

approaches.

3 49+280

Koleti PUP

approaches

both ends

Award passed, no payment

made to land owners. Land

problem to be delft by NHAI.

Service road can be

constructed on LHS and

accordingly approaches

can be constructed.

4 50+845

Palas PUP

approaches

on both ends

Verification of land required from

Dy. SLR for confirmation of

encroachment of private land.

The Vaishali Hotel owner

allowing any construction

activity.


constructing service

road on LHS and thus

constructing the

approaches.

5 54+450 Nagothane

VUP

Govt. land/court matter & the

embankment toe is going

Railway land (ROW) on LHS.

Matter needs to be sorted for

starting the construction activity.

There is no problem for

constructing RHS service

road and the

approaches.

6 68+320 Khmab PUP

Still there are 9 structures on

site which not in vacant position,


RE wall.

Concessionaire should

proactively support for

encroachment removal if

any.

7 79+140 Ratwad PUP

No payment made to land

owners. Land owners are not

allowing for work, land problem

to be solved by NHAI.


constructing the

approaches.


Sl No

Chainage Side

Length (Km)

Remarks From To

13 63+900 65+900 LHS 2,000 Work is slow progress 14 70+000 72+300 LHS 2,300 No work 15 74+800 76+200 RHS 1,400 Work is slow progress 16 76+550 76+850 LHS 300 No work 17 77+000 77+700 RHS 700 No work 18 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work 19 81+200 82+400 RHS 1,200 GSB work is not completed 20 81+500 82+600 LHS 1,100 No work

Total 22,900

The above details show that in spite of sufficient work fronts available the Concessionaire

could not achieve better progress due to lack of various resources.

Non-Maintenance of The Project Highway : It has been observed that at some

locations (most of them are in new carriageway) many Potholes/Patchwork are not yet

repaired in spite of continuous follow up with Concessionaire. Non-maintenance of the

highway is leading to lot of criticism by the road users, administration and print media. Non-

maintenance of the highway will have to be considered as default of obligations by the

Concessionaire as per the terms of the Concession Agreement.

Many Pending Designs and Drawings: Many design and drawings for highway and

structures are still pending with Concessionaire. An updated list was issued to

Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2806 dt. 04-12-’14. In spite of several

reminders no action is taken by Concessionaire for last nine months.

Non-Closure Of NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports, Audit Reports: Concessionaire

has not closed out many NCR’s Site Inspection Reports / Audit Reports in spite of several

reminders. Concessionaire has been advised many times that whatever works carried out

above the work where NCR/site inspection note issued will also be considered Non-

acceptable. In spite of such reminders Concessionaire has not yet improve the quality of

works. Non-closure of such NCR’s/Site Inspection Report/Audit Reports/ letters on

quality issues etc. is of major quality concern and will lead to contractual complications.

Insufficient Resources: Concessionaire has not mobilised sufficient resources such as

fund, manpower, machinery, plant etc. Resources mobilised are very less. Construction

works were held up many times for want of fund, cement, bitumen, diesel, manpower,

machinery, and other resources etc.

Crusher Production in Section - II : It has been observed that crusher production in

Section - II is very less and will not cater for requirement and this has been reported to

Concessionaire vide letter no. PIP/IE/SPITPL/2014/2773 dt. 21-11-‘14


Status of ROB Approvals: The following is the status of approval of ROB’s:

Sl No

Chainage (Km)

Location Status

1 16+062 Kharpada

(1) GAD (General Arrangement Drawing) - Approved by Railways.






(7) MoU executed.

2 28+283 Pen


(2) SAD (Structure Arrangement Drawing) – Done

(3) TAD (Temporary Arrangement Drawing) – Done




(7) MoU executed.

3 33+877 Wadkhal Bypass


(2) SAD (Structure Arrangement Drawing) - Not Submitted

(3) TAD (Temporary Arrangement Drawing) - Not Submitted to

Railways

(4) CRS (Commissioner Railway Safety) - Sanction not Obtained

(5) Codal charges not paid by Concessionaire

(6) MoU executed.

Section - I EPC Contractor’s camp closed down:

For last six months the Section - I EPC Contractor’s camp site is closed down.

Independent Engineers are not allowed to enter their premises. Photos taken from

outside of their premises given below:


The reinforcement steel which was already tied up for the slab of VUP at Ch. 28+860 (Khopoli

Underpass) has been removed. The shutter arrangements also removed. Photos taken from site

given below:


8.0 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo - 01 WMM First layer at Ch. 61+470 to 61+650 (RHS).

Photo - 02 GSB at Ch.64+400 to 64+460 (RHS).

Photo -03 Embankment First Layer at Ch. 74+290 to 74+430 (LHS).

Photo-04 Nigade bridge at Ch.44+195 pile P2 work in progress

Photo-05 Toll plaza Administrative building at Ch. 66+608 work in progress


Appendix-A

Comments on Concessionaire’s Monthly Progress Report

Concessionaire has not yet submitted the Progress Report for the month January ’15 and

February ’15 so far in spite of several reminders.


Appendix-B

Weather

Date

Section-I* Section-II

Temperature (◦C) Rainfall (mm)

Temperature (◦C) Rainfall (mm) Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum

26-01-‘15 17.9 31.1

27-01-‘15 18.6 31.8

28-01-‘15 18.5 31.9

29-01-‘15 18.8 31.6

30-01-‘15 18.6 32.0

31-01-‘15 18.4 32.2

01-02-‘15 18.0 32.4

02-02-‘15 18.6 32.8

03-02-‘15 18.5 32.9

04-02-‘15 19.1 33.4

05-02-‘15 18.9 33.0

06-02-‘15 18.4 32.8

07-02-‘15 18.8 32.9

08-02-‘15 19.1 33.4

09-02-‘15 17.6 32.9

10-02-‘15 19.4 33.4

11-02-‘15 19.5 33.9

12-02-‘15 19.1 32.2

13-02-‘15 18.9 33.5

14-02-‘15 19.0 33.2

15-02-‘15 18.8 33.0

16-02-‘15 18.6 33.6

17-02-‘15 18.9 33.4

18-02-‘15 18.6 33.2

19-02-‘15 19.1 33.8

20-02-‘15 18.9 33.9

21-02-‘15 18.6 33.4

22-02-‘15 18.4 34.0

23-02-‘15 18.9 33.6

24-02-‘15 18.5 33.4

25-02-‘15 18.6 34.1

* Details not given by Concessionaire.


Appendix-C

Important Visits

Nil.


Appendix-D

Minutes of Monthly Progress Review Meeting

Four-Laning of Panvel-Indapur Section of NH-17 (Package No : NHDP-

III/DL4/05)

Meeting could not be conducted since Concessionaire’s representative has not

attending the site inspection and scheduled Progress Review Meeting.


Appendix-E

Four-Laning of Panvel-Indapur Section of NH-17 (Package No: NHDP-III/DL4/05)

Site Inspection Note No -45

Inspection Note

No. : 45

Date : 11-02-2015

Construction

Package :

Four Laning of Panvel-Indapur Section of NH-17 (From Km 0+000 to

84+000) in the State of Maharashtra under NHDP Phase-III on DBFOT

Basis (Package No : NHDP-III/DL4/05)

Concessionaire : Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited

Independent

Engineer :

M/s Yongma Engineering Co., Ltd. In association with M/s Feedback

Infra Private Limited

Project

Management

Consultants

: M/s Sowil Limited

EPC Contractors : Ch. 0+000 to 42+000: M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Ch. 42+000 to 84+000 : M/s Supreme Infrastructure India Limited

Appointed Date : 19-12-2011

Scheduled date of

Completion : 16-06-2014 (910 Days Construction Period)

Attendees :

(1) Mr. Gangadharan C. P, TL-IE

(2) Mr. R.P. Sharma, RE-IE

(3) Mr. Pathankar, material Engineer-EPC

(4) Mr. Sengupta, Sr. Bridge Enginner-EPC.

(5) Mr. Mulani , Bridge Engineer-EPC

(6) Mr. Ankush, Highway Enginner -EPC

Sl

No Chainage/

Location Description of Problem Photo

45.1 50+845 (LHS)

Palas Underpass

Approaches

Normal soil dumped on the

underpass approaches where

selected soil having specific C & Ø

value should be used. RE wall

foundation should not be on buit

up embankments.


Sl

No Chainage/


45.2 61+600 (RHS)

It appears that dust is added to the

GSB surface. Without proper

compaction of GSB layer, WMM laid

at some portion.

45.3 Sukheli Khind

Proper safety arrangements to be

made before hard rock excavation as

traffic is plying on the highway.


Sl

No Chainage/


45.4 67+520 (LHS)

widening portion

Type of profile correction course

(PCC) to be anaylsed and submitted

to IE for concurrence. Widening

portion should be in tune with the

PCC.

45.5 74+430 to 74+570

(LHS)

Boulders to be removed from the

earth work.

45.6 At various Locations Potholes need maintenance. Many

letters already issues.

45.7 At Various

Locations

New encroachments, hoarding and

OFC cables coming up along the

Project highway. Many letters already

issued to Concessionaire.


Appendix-F

Letters from NHAI to Independent Engineer

Sl

No Date Letter No. Subject

1 02-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/IE/2015/2167 RTI application.

2 02-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2174 New Encroachment at Ch. 73+780 to 73+980 both sides.

3 03-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/Safety/2015/2204 Report on construction stage audit (6th Quarter) & work zone safety audit (5th

Quarter).

4 07-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PNVL/P-I/EOT/2015/2211 Revised Construction Programme Four Laning.

5 10-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2254 Exposed CPCC treated reinforcements.

7 10-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2258 Representation Sh. Rajendra Manohar Raut.

8 10-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PNVL/P-I/SALT PAN LAND/2015/2261 Transfer of Salt Pan Land to NHAI.

9 10-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/IE/2015/2262 RTI application.

10 10-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/SPITPL/2015/2259 Representation.

11 11-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/IE/Retail/Outlet/2015/2263 Permission to have access for proposal Retail outlet on S. No. 205A of Village

Shirdhone, Tal Panvel, Dist. Raigad on NH-17.

12 14-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2266 Objection to erection of 22KV line along NH-17 from Jite to Hamrapur Phata

and Pen to Kolety Goan.

13 14-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2280 Maintenance of the Highway and Safety Measures.

14 14-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/IE/2015/2281 Site status & other Issue.

15 14-02-'15 NHAI/PIU-Panvel/PI/Utility/2015/2287 OFC line by TATA Telecom.

16 17-02-'15 NHAI/MJPRCL/PIU/PANVEL/NOC-

Survey/2015/2290 Seeking Permission for conducting road survey on NH-4B & SH-54 (NH-348A).

17 17-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2292 Repair-Maintenance of NH-17.

18 17-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/ROB/2015/2294 Proposal of Panvel-Pen-Roha doubling project Railway bridge.


19 17-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PNVL/P-I/EOT/2015/2309 Revised Construction Programme Four Laning.

20 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/CIDCO/2015/2293 CIDCO pipe line.

21 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/Utility/2015/2326 MJP-Water supply pipe line.

22 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2327 Non submission of Monthly Progress Report of January 15.

23 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2333 Demarcation of ROW at Village Karnala-Tara.

24 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2338 Representations.

25 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PNVL/P-I/SPITPL/2015/2348 Maintenance of existing Bhogeshwari Bridge.

26 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/ROB/2015/2366 MOU signing for construction of ROB at Pen, Kharpada & Wadkhal.

27 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PANVEL/PI/SPITPL/2015/2371 Salt Pen Land.

28 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/PI/OFC/2015/2372 Permission for laying Optical Fiber Cable along NH-17 from Km 28.824 to km

84.000 for the total length of 55.176 km.

29 23-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/Panvel/Pi/IE/2015/2377 Representation.

30 27-02-'15 NHAI/PIU/PNVL/P-I/Conc./2015/2410 Extension of Time (EOT) for schedule 4 laning.


Appendix-G Letters from Concessionaire to Independent Engineer

Sl

No Date Letter No. Subject

1 03-02-'15 SPITPL/P-NHAI/2014-15/3361 Site Status.

2 03-02-'15 SPITPL/P-NHAI/2014-15/3380 Submission of Revised Work Programme.

3 12-02-'15 SPITPL/P-NHAI/2014-15/3382 Submission of Modified Revised Construction Programme.

4 28-02-'15 SPITPL/P-NHAI/2014-15/3383 Submission of Working Drawings for Box Culverts.



7 28-02-'15 SPITPL/P-NHAI/2014-15/3386 Source approval for procurement of stripe seal Expansion joint MAGEBA

Bridge 14 Products.


Appendix-H

Letters Issued by Independent Engineer

Sl

No Date Letter No. To Subject

1 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2946 NHAI Invoice No - PIP/38 (January ’15).

2 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2947 NHAI Leave Absence of Asst. Quality cum Material Engineer Mr. Raffiuddin .N. Badure.

3 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2948 NHAI Intimation Regarding Ms. Reshma Katekar, Computer Operator Leaving the Project

Team.

4 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2949 Concessionaire Site Inspection No-045 and Progress Review Meeting.

5 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2950 NHAI Leave Absence of Team Leader Cum Sr. Highway Engineer.

6 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2951 Concessionaire Project Monitoring Information System (PMIS) to be Updated-Reminder No-2.

7 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2952 NHAI Request For Extension of Time For Independent Engineer Consultancy Agreement-

Reminder.

8 02-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2953 NHAI Revised Construction Programme Four Laning-Comments.

9 03-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2954 Concessionaire New Encroachment at Ch. 26+270 To 26+350 (RHS).

10 03-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2955 Concessionaire Hoarding Inside Right of Way.

11 03-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2956 NHAI Permission for Laying of 1500 mm dia MS Water Supply Pipeline under CIDCO

Hetwane water supply Scheme in Right of Way of NH-17-Comments.


13 03-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2958 Concessionaire Exposed CPCC Treated Reinforcements.

14 03-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2959 NHAI Application Under the RTI Act, from Shri Vivek N. Datar.

15 04-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2960 Concessionaire Transaction Statements of Escrow Account -Reminder No-7.

16 06-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2961 Concessionaire Various Quality Issues.

17 06-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2962 Concessionaire Cracks Observed in Approach Slab at Various Locations.

18 07-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2963 Concessionaire Core Cutting Pattern for DBM Works.

19 07-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2964 Concessionaire Representation.


Sl


20 07-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2965 Concessionaire Further Distressed DBM at Various Locations.

21 07-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2966 NHAI Leave Absence of Assistant Highway Engineer Mr. Pillai Arun Rajan.

22 07-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2967 Concessionaire Development of Potholes/Patches on the Newly Laid DBM/BC-Investigation Through

Govt. Agency.

23 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2968 Concessionaire NCR No-182-Pipe Culvert at Ch. 50+808 (RHS).

24 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2969 NHAI Leave Absence of Bridge Engineer Mr. Nagaraja Rao.

25 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2970 Concessionaire Electrical Poles at Ch.21+200 to 22+800 (LHS).

26 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2971 Concessionaire Safety Issue at Ch. 2+100 to 2+200 (RHS).

27 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2972 NHAI Accident Data and Horticulture Report.

28 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2973 Concessionaire Non-Submission of Monthly Progress Report of January ’15.

29 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2974 Concessionaire Construction Works Not Yet Resumed Properly.

30 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2975 Concessionaire Change of Scope Pending With the Concessionaire-Reminder No-5.

31 09-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2976 NHAI Monthly Progress Report No-36 (January ‘15).


33 11-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2978 Concessionaire Encroachment by Reliance Jio OFC Cable Laying.

34 11-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2979 Concessionaire Profile Corrective Course (PCC) for Existing Carriageway- Reminder No- 10

35 11-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2980 NHAI Application Under the RTI Act, from Shri Johny Dsouza.

36 12-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2981 NHAI Leave Absence of Assistant Highway Engineer Mr. Neeraj. M. Patil.

37 12-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2982 Concessionaire Site Inspection Note No-45 dt. 10-02-’15.

38 12-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2983 Concessionaire Quality Issues.

39 13-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2984 Concessionaire Maintenance of Existing Bhogeshwari Bridge-Reminder No-02.

40 13-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2985 Concessionaire Pending Maintenance Activities.

41 13-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2986 NHAI Modified Revised Construction Programme Four Laning-Comments.

42 14-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2987 NHAI Site Status and Other Issues-Comments.

43 14-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2988 NHAI Leave Absence of Resident cum Highway Engineer Mr. R.P. Sharma.


Sl


44 14-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2989 Concessionaire Section- II-Stone Polishing Value Test- Reminder No-8.

45 14-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2990 Concessionaire Embankment Material with Boulders.

46 16-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2991 NHAI Leave Absence of Accountant Mrs. Madhumati. P. Kumar.

47 23-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2992 NHAI Transaction Statements of Escrow Account not being Submitted by the

Concessionaire.

48 23-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2993 Concessionaire Non- Closure of Long Pending NCR’s, Site Inspection Reports and Letters on Quality

Issues- Reminder No-10.

49 24-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2994 NHAI Permission for Laying of 1500 mm dia MS Water Supply Pipeline under CIDCO

Hetwane water supply Scheme in Right of Way of NH-17-Comments.

50 24-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/2995 NHAI Some of the Staff Out of Station on 25-02-2015.

51 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2996 NHAI Hoarding Inside Right of Way.

52 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2997 Concessionaire Construction Works Not Yet Resumed Properly-Reminder No-11.

53 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2998 Concessionaire Continued Use of Un-approved Steel-Major Quality and Durability Issue-Show Cause

Notice- Reminder No-2.

54 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/2999 Concessionaire Lack of Equipments in the Laboratory-Reminder No-5.

55 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3000 Concessionaire Environmental Management Plan-Corrected Report-Reminder No-8.

56 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3001 Concessionaire Various Issues- Reminder No-5.

57 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3002 Concessionaire Section-II- Non-Calibration of Plants and Equipments- Reminder No-4.


59 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3004 Concessionaire Encroachment of OFC Cable Laying.

60 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3005 Concessionaire NCR No-183-Box Culvert at Ch. 66+808 (RHS).

61 26-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3006 Concessionaire Slow Progress of Shifting of MJP Water Pipeline.

62 28-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3007 Concessionaire Encroachment by OFC Cable Laying at Ch. 0+400 to 0+500 (LHS)

63 28-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3008 Concessionaire NCR No-184- Ch. 66+850 to 66+870 (LHS).

64 28-02-'15 PIP/IE/SPITPL/2015/3009 Concessionaire Representation From M/s Vibhor Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. at Ch. 63+700 -Comments.


Sl


65 28-02-'15 PIP/IE/NHAI/2015/3010 NHAI Updating of Project Monitoring System Data and uploading Data For Project Specific

Website.


Appendix-I

1. Stretch Panvel to Indapur Accident Data & Observations

2. Stretch Chainage 0+000 to 84+600.

3. State Maharashtra.

4. District Raigarh

5. Police Station Palaspe, Nagothane, New Panvel, SP Traffic Control Office

Alibag.

6. National Highway No. NH - 17

Month : February 2015

Sl

No

Date Time of Accident

(am/pm)

A B C D E F G H

Vehicle

Responsible

No. of Affected Persons No. of

Animals

Killed, if

any

Help

provided by

Ambulance/

Patrol Vehicle

Remarks Accident Location

Nature of Accident

Classificati

on

of Accident

Causes Road

Features

Road

Conditi

on

Intersec

tion Type &

Control

Weather Condition

Fatal Grievous Minor Non-

Injured

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

'A' : Urban / Rural and Details of surrounding land use

'B' : 1 - Overturning, 2-Head on collision, 3 - Rear End Collision, 4 - Collision Brush / Side Wipe, 5 - Right Turn Collision, 6-Skidding, 7 - Right Turn Collision, 8 - Others (Pls Specific)

'C' : 1- Fata, 2 - Grievous Injury, 3 - Minor Injured, 4 - Non Injury

'D' :1 - Drunken, 2 - Overspending, 3 - Vehicle out of control, 4 - Fault of driver of motor vehicle / driver of other vehicle / cyclist / pedestrarian /, 5 - Defect in mechanical condition of motor vehicle /

road condition

'E' : 1 - Single lane, 2 - Two lanes, 3 - three lanes or more without central divider (median), 4 - Four lanes or emore with Central divider

‘F’ : 1 - Straight road, 2 - Slight curve, 3 Sharp Curve, 4 - Flat Road, 5-Gentlre incline, 6 - Steel incline, 7 - Hump, 8-Dip

'G' : 1-T-Junction, 2 - Y-Junction, 3 - Four arm junction, 4-Staggered junction, 5-Junctioin with more than 4 arms, 6-Roundabout junction 7 - Manned rail crossing, 9-Unmanned rail crossing

'H' : 1 - Fine, 2 - Mist / Flag, 3- Cloudy, 4 - Light rain, 5-Heavy rain, 6-Hail / Sleet, 7 - Strong Wind, 9-Dust Storm, 10-Very Hot, 11-Very Cold, 12-Othe extraordinary weather condition

Accident data is not provided by Concessionaire in spite of several reminders.


The Accident data reported since May ’12 shows that frequent accidents are occurring at following locations:

Sl. No. Chainage (km) Village

1 37 + 500 Gadab

2 56 + 320 Nagothane

3 62 + 500 Sukheli

4 68 + 180 Khamb

Independent Road Safety Consultants (M/s CRAPHTS Consultants Pvt. Ltd.) has identified

the following locations as black spots:

(1) Nagothane (Ch. 54+000)

(2) Sukheli Khind (Ch. 65+000)

Panvel - Indapur MPR No-37 February‘15 Page 114

Appendix-J

Highway - Progress


Appendix-K

Structures - Progress


`

P-12 P-13

Progress during this month

A-1 P-1 P-2 P-3

Wadhkal Flyover at ch-33+860 RHS (Indapur bound)

P-18 P-19P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11A-1

P-7P-5P-4 P-14 P-15 P-16 P-19P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11

P-7

Wadhkal Flyover at ch-33+860 LHS (Indapur bound)

P-6 P-17 P-18

Work Completed Till End of Last Month

P-1 P-3P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 P-16 P-17P-2 P-4 P-5 P-6


`

`

Total no of Girders : 304 Nos

No. of Girder Erected till end of last month : 0 No

No. of Girder Erected during this month : 0NosNo. of Girder cast during this month : 0NosWork Completed Till End of Last

Month

Progress during this month Total no of Girders : 304 Nos

No. of Girder cast till end of last month : 14 No

P-27 P-28 P-29P-20 P-21 P-22 P-23 P-24 P-25 P-26 P-30 P-31 P-39 A-2P-33 P-34 P-35 P-36 P-37 P-38P-32

A-2

Wadhkal Flyover at ch-33+860 LHS (Indapur bound)

Wadhkal Flyover at ch-33+860 RHS (Panvel bound)

P-27 P-28 P-29 P-30 P-31 P-32P-20 P-21 P-34 P-39P-35 P-36 P-38P-22 P-23 P-24 P-25 P-26 P-37P-33cc c c c c c c c c

c c c c c c c c c c


A-1 P-2P-1 P-3 P-4 A-2

PEN ROBPEN ROB APPROACH RETAINING WALL

(LHS)

`


`

No. of Girder cast till end of last month :24 Nos No. of Girder Erected till end of last month :8 Nos

No. of Girder Erected during this month : 8 Nos

P-5P-4

P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9

P-2P-1


P-24 A-25P-18 P-19 P-20 P-21 P-22 P-23A-1

P-16 P-17P-11

Major Bridge at Ch. 15+879 (Kharpada)P-3

P-10 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15

Progress during this month Total no of Girders : 91 Nos

No. of Girder cast during this month : 0 NosWork Completed Till End of Last Month


No. of Girder cast till end of last month : 16Nos (Casting Completed)

A1P1 P2 P3

A2


Major Bridge at Ch. 20+144 (Balganga)-RHS



No. of Girder Erected till end of last month :8 Nos



`

Major bridge at Ch. 26+188 (Bhogeshwari)-RHS-New Construction

P-4 P-5 P-6

A-2A-1 P-1 P-2 P-3

No. of Girder cast till end of last month : 28Nos (Casting Completed)



No. of Girder Erected till end of last month :28 Nos (Erection Completed)Work Completed Till End of Last Month





Major bridge at Ch. 26+188 (Bhogeshwari)-LHS-Existing Bridge Reconstruction


Total No. of Girder : 24 No.

P-2 P-4

A-2A-1 P-1 P-3 P-5



Major bridge at Ch. 44+195 (Nigade)-RHS

No. of Girder cast ti l l end of last month : 11 Nos

No. of Girder cast during this month : 0




P-3 A-2P-1 P-4

Major bridge at Ch. 58+928 (Amba)-LHS

A-1 P-2


Total No. of Girder : 40 No.

No. of Girder cast till end of last month : 16 Nos

No. of Girder cast during this month : 0 Nos.Work Completed Till End of Last Month


Major bridge at Ch. 58+928 (Amba)-RHS



A-1 P-2 P-3 A-2P-1 P-4


P-11A-1

P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4


P-10

A-2


P-9

Major bridge at ch. 72+936 (Kundlika)-RHS

P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8


Minor Bridge at Ch. 0+554 (LHS)

A-1P-1

P-2 A-2

A-2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 0+554 (RHS)

A-1 P-1 P-2

A2P-1 A-2

A1Minor Bridge at Ch. 9+363-LHS

A2


A-2A1

Minor Bridge at Ch. 9+363-RHS


P-1


Minor Bridge at Ch. 20+754 (Balivali) -LHS

A2A1P1 P2 P3

A-1 P-2 A-2P-1


A2A-2A1

Minor Bridge at Ch. 30+557 (Uchede)-RHS

P-1


P3 A2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 52+155 (Nidhi)-RHS

A1 P1 P2

A2P-1 A-2A1

Minor Bridge at Ch. 57+997 (Patansai)-RHS

A2A- 2A-1


A2



A- 2A-1 Minor Bridge at Ch. 59+861 (Godsai)-RHS


62+01

`

A2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 62+345-(RHS) A- 2A-1

A2


A2P-1 A-2A1


A2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 66+808(LHS)




A2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 66+808(RHS)

A2A-1 A- 2


A2A1 A-2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 67+099-(RHS)

A2




P-1 A-2A1


A2


A2A- 2A-1 Minor Bridge at Ch. 69+140-(RHS)

A-1 P-2 A-2P-1

Minor Bridge at Ch. 72+255-(LHS)


A-1 P-2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 73+353-(RHS)

A-2P-1P-3

P-4



Minor Bridge at Ch. 77+804 (BHUVAN)-(RHS)

A1 P1 A2


A-1 A-2P-2P-1

A2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 83+920(LHS)

A- 2A-1


A2

Minor Bridge at Ch. 83+920(RHS)

A- 2A-1

P-2 A-2P-1A-1A-2


Minor Bridge at Ch. 84+488 (INDAPUR)-(RHS)

A-1 P-1 P-2



Appendix-L

Status of Vehicular Underpasses

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 5+000 - Chinchvan

RHSLHS

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 23+460

RHS

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 25+873 (LHS) - Khopoli



Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 27+155 - Pen(Converted to VUP)

LHS RHS


Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 27+760 - PEN

LHS RHS

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 28+535 - (PEN) PUP Converted to VUPLHS RHS

LHS RHS

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 30+930 WADKHAL


LHS RHS

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 32+485 WADKHAL



Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 54+450 - Nagothane (Additional As Per CA)LHS RHS

Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 56+060 - NagothaneLHS RHS



Vehicular Underpass (VUP) at Ch. 73+760 - Kolad LHS RHS


Appendix-M

Status of Pedestrian Underpasses

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 1+230 - Palaspe

LHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 13+625 -Tara

LHS RHS

Pedestriann Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 18+700 - Jite

LHS RHS

Pedestriann Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 27+420

LHS RHS


Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 30+112 (UCHEDE)

LHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 37+529

LHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 39+740 KHAPALE (Additional as per CA)

LHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 42+155 - KasuLHS RHS


q

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 45+225 - NigadeLHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 49+280 - KoletiLHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 50+845 -PALAS (Additional As Per CA)

LHS RHS

Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 55+840 - NagothaneLHS RHS


Pedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 68+320 - KhambLHS RHS

RHSPedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 76+315 - Talavali

LHS


LHS RHSPedestrian Underpass (PUP) at Ch. 79+140 - Ratvad



Appendix-N

1 5+349 5+359

2 5+435 5+440

3 6+524 6+530

4 6+864 6+872

5 7+011 7+014

6 8+087 8+095

7 8+305 8+248

8 8+541 8+498

9 8+915 8+879

10 9+571 9+570

11 9+937 9+984

12 16+815 16+813

13 17+514 17+531

14 18+040 18+038

15 18+446 18+481

16 20+963 20+968

17 24+259 24+249

18 27+524 27+521

19 28+383 28+091

20 30+898 30+940

21 32+740 32+946

22 33+050 33+019

23 34+100 34+130

24 34+273 34+348

25 34+594 34+667

26 34+726 34+804

27 35+706 35+786

28 35+941 36+019

29 36+157 36+235

30 36+319 36+408

31 36+504 36+581

32 36+665 36+743

33 36+837 36+915

34 37+028 37+106

35 37+432 37+520

36 38+269 38+336

37 38+801 38+801

38 38+952 39+030

39 39+030 39+133

40 39+358 39+436

41 39+454 39+532

42 39+640 39+640

43 39+807 39+807

44 40+246 40+246

45 40+564 40+564

Progress during this Month

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Status Of Slab Culverts/Box CulvertsMCW RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

Sl.

No

Ch

ain

ag

e (

As

pe

r C

A)

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

De

sig

n C

ha

ina

ge

SR LHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

MCW LHS

Su

b

str

uctu

re

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re



46 40+750 40+750

47 40+906 40+906

48 41+125 41+125

49 41+268 41+268

50 41+414 41+414

51 41+481 41+559

52 41+888 41+961

53 42+170 42+249

54 42+442 42+520

55 42+967 42+922

56 43+055 43+045

57 43+326 43+133

58 45+264 45+343

59 45+489 45+568

60 45+672 45+751

61 45+784 45+864

62 45+889 45+977

63 45+939 46+016

64 46+042 46+122

65 46+238 46+313

66 46+544 46+619

67 47+169 47+244

68 47+353 47+428

69 47+428 47+627

70 47+752 47+750

71 47+833 47+909

72 48+725 48+722

73 48+800 48+870

74 50+093 50+163

75 50+460 50+531

76 51+407 51+478

77 51+611 51+681

78 52+269 52+335

79 52+416 52+484

80 52+773 52+841

81 53+390 53+456

82 53+594 53+661

83 53+825 53+900

84 54+746 54+815

85 55+266 55+335

86 56+099 56+165

87 56+449 56+517

88 56+583 56+651

89 57+022 57+090

90 57+256 57+325 i

Work Completed Till End of Last Month Progress during this Month

Status Of Slab Culverts/Box Culverts

Sl.

NoC

ha

ina

ge

(A

s

pe

r C

A)

MCW LHS MCW RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

De

sig

n

Ch

ain

ag

e

SR LHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re


91 57+465 57+533

92 57+733 57+802

93 58+133 58+201

94 64+057 64+119

95 64+317 64+391

96 67+977 68+036

97 68+556 68+615

98 68+768 68+827

99 69+789 69+849

100 70+167 70+227

101 70+477 70+480

102 70+636 70+694

103 70+911 70+971

104 71+019 71+086

105 71+441 71+502

106 71+626 71+685

107 73+577 73+686

108 74+264 74+323

109 74+404 74+463

110 74+611 74+650

111 74+750 74+809

112 74+877 74+936

113 75+100 75+159

114 75+306 75+365

115 75+502 75+561

116 75+548 75+608

117 75+530 75+790

118 75+852 75+912

119 75+906 75+963

120 76+038 76+097

121 76+141 76+200

122 76+393 76+452

123 76+512 76+571

124 76+979 77+038

125 77+206 77+265

126 77+315 77+376

127 77+934 77+997

128 78+105 78+167

129 78+803 78+855

130 79+221 79+280

131 79+403 79+464

132 80+110 80+169

133 80+494 80+554

134 81+155 81+213

135 82+525 82+583

136 84+252 84+308


Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re

MCW RHS

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Su

b

str

uctu

re

Status Of Slab Culverts/Box Culverts

De

sig

n

Ch

ain

ag

e

SR LHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

re

SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Fo

un

da

tio

n

Su

pe

r

str

uctu

reSl.

No

Ch

ain

ag

e (

As

pe

r C

A)

MCW LHS


Appendix-O

1 0+393 0+402

2 0+578 0+607

3 0+657 0+698

4 0+900 0+900

5 1+188 1+198

6 1+280 1+288

7 1+667 1+678

8 1+774 1+753

9 2+092 2+100

10 2+196 2+208

11 2+395 2+405

12 2+660 2+774

13 3+066 3+075

14 3+242 3+251

15 3+403 3+467

16 3+658 3+676

17 3+884 3+893

18 4+365 4+375

19 4+794 4+804

20 5+031 5+040

21 5+331 5+360

22 5+637 5+638

23 5+724 5+731

24 5+756 5+767

25 5+845 5+852

26 6+012 6+021

27 6+103 6+103

28 6+183 6+19029

29 6+448 6+45430

30 6+595 6+605

31 6+728 6+736

32 7+170 7+174

33 7+308 7+310

34 7+567 7+571

35 7+811 7+816

36 8+047 8+055

37 8+195 8+130

38 8+246 8+192

39 8+303 8+306

40 8+499 8+444

41 8+606 8+538

42 8+670 8+606

43 8+723 8+672

44 8+758 8+725

45 8+967 8+920

46 9+107 9+110

47 9+265 9+264

48 9+460 9+460

49 9+612 9+612

50 9+705 9+709

51 9+844 9+849

52 10+164 10+168

53 10+260 10+264

54 10+412 10+413


Sl.

No

Ch

ain

ag

e

Status Of Pipe Culverts

MCW LHS

He

ad

Wa

ll

De

sig

n C

ha

ina

ge

SR LHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

MCW RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing


55 10+464 10+466

56 10+602 10+603

57 10+901 10+903

58 11+100 11+102

59 11+175 11+174

60 11+292 11+295

61 11+422 11+421

62 11+481 11+480

63 11+595 11+594

64 11+678 11+677

65 11+760 11+764

66 11+877 11+880

67 12+055 12+057

68 12+144 12+148

69 12+259 12+258

70 12+497 12+497

71 12+566 12+567

72 12+658 12+659

73 12+825 12+826

74 13+179 13+180

75 13+395 13+394

76 13+527 13+524

77 13+924 13+922

78 14+172 14+170

79 14+242 14+272

80 14+380 14+380

81 14+511 14+511

82 14+858 14+858

83 15+169 15+170

84 17+970 17+970

85 18+379 18+428

86 18+482 18+557

87 18+556 18+935

88 18+808 19+322

89 18+918 19+425

90 19+208 19+711

91 19+323 19+820

92 21+284 21+284

93 21+551 21+554

94 22+169 22+168

95 22+804 22+798

96 23+077 23+070

97 23+166 23+158

98 23+315 23+377

99 23+562 23+564

100 23+945 23+950

101 23+643 23+635

102 24+454 24+460

103 24+710 24+701

104 24+848 24+841

105 24+930 24+921

106 25+181 25+172

107 25+447 25+450

108 25+301 25+292

109 25+672 25+667

110 25+668 25+701

111 25+968 25+954



Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

SR LHS SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

Sl.

No

MCW LHS MCW RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

He

ad

Wa

ll

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

Ch

ain

ag

e

De

sig

n

Ch

ain

ag

e

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing


112 26+409 26+410

113 26+587 26+574

114 26+662 26+660

115 26+769 26+769

116 26+863 26+865

117 27+132 27+122

118 27+493 27+459

119 27+785 27+768

120 28+583 29+103

121 29+298 29+291

122 29+959 29+950

123 30+201 30+193

124 30+700 30+679

125 31+007 31+017

126 31+315 31+323

127 31+449 31+461

128 32+220 32+217

129 34+445 34+522

130 34+791 34+871

131 35+003 35+079

132 35+040 35+254

133 35+178 35+501

134 35+238 35+606

135 35+425 35+519

136 35+529 35+725

137 37+223 37+301

138 37+378 37+368

139 37+586 37+664

140 37+694 37+771

141 37+805 37+883

142 41+736 41+783

143 42+134 42+060

144 42+325 42+382

145 42+844 42+809

146 43+436 43+514

147 43+637 43+719

148 44+415 44+620

149 44+731 44+838

150 48+265 48+230

151 48+375 48+340

152 48+652 48+609

153 49+073 49+146

154 49+178 49+250

155 49+527 49+597

156 49+683 49+756

157 49+963 50+033

158 50+040 50+111

159 50+365 50+435

160 50+562 50+694

161 50+738 50+808

162 50+874 50+916

163 51+303 51+367

164 51+705 51+775

165 51+758 51+829

166 51+916 51+985

167 52+604 52+672



Sl.

No

Ch

ain

ag

e

SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

He

ad

Wa

ll

De

sig

n

Ch

ain

ag

e

SR LHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

MCW RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

MCW LHS

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

PC

C


168 53+126 53+185

169 53+276 53+315

170 53+977 54+015

171 54+254 54+254

172 54+446 54+515

173 54+563 54+630

174 54+971 54+980

175 54+987 55+055

176 55+018 55+087

177 55+553 55+621

178 55+794 55+862

179 56+166 56+234

180 56+544 56+612

181 57+952 58+018

182 58+173 58+241

183 58+222 58+290

184 58+632 58+700

185 59+290 59+350

186 60+921 60+984

187 62+397 62+460

188 63+000 63+063

189 63+486 63+548

190 63+805 63+866

191 64+149 64+210

192 64+608 64+665

193 64+685 64+742

194 64+808 64+808

195 64+874 64+842

196 64+915 64+931

197 65+069 65+060

198 65+115 65+127

199 65+348 65+407

200 65+987 66+0691

201 66+073 66+135

202 66+314 66+373

203 67+485 67+544

204 67+676 67+735

205 67+743 67+801

206 68+207 68+266

207 68+328 68+400

208 68+408 68+480

209 69+520 69+580

210 70+477 70+537

211 70+574 70+660

212 70+765 70+825

213 71+018 71+078

214 71+205 71+265

215 72+016 72+085

216 72+213 72+374

217 72+391 73+450

218 72+491 73+550

219 74+591 74+575

220 74+970 75+029

221 76+341 76+400

222 78+537 78+598

223 78+697 78+755

224 79+714 79+764

225 80+912 80+981

226 81+772 81+861

227 82+986 82+900

228 83+629 83+687


SR RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll


Pip

e L

ay

ing

De

sig

n C

ha

ina

ge

He

ad

Wa

llSl.

No

Ch

ain

ag

e

MCW LHS MCW RHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

SR LHS

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

Pip

e L

ay

ing

Pip

e L

ay

ing

He

ad

Wa

ll

Ex

ca

va

tio

n

PC

C

He

ad

Wa

ll

national highways authority of indianhai.org.in/spw/process/m_p_r february15.pdfnational highways...

Documents