NATIONALCLEANUP WORKSHOP

A Big Step Increase in the EM TD Program

Office of Environmental Management

No EM Mission

Completed State

Completed Site

Remaining EM Mission

MISSION SUCCESS AND CHALLENGE

MISSION SUCCESS

19891991

19931995

19971999

20012003

20052007

20092011

20132015

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

$152 billion total spent.Completed 91 of 107 major sites.

Profile of Historical EM Annual Costs

US

Dol

lars

in B

illio

ns Average Annual Budget = $6B

MISSION CHALLENGE

20162019

20222025

20282031

20342037

20402043

20462049

20522055

20582061

20640

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

$235 billion to-go estimate.2065 completion forecast.

Cost Profile of Remaining Work

US

Dol

lars

in B

illio

ns

Historical Annual Budget Level = $6B

$28 billion gap

19891991

19931995

19971999

20012003

20052007

20092011

20132015

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

His

toric

al A

nnua

l Per

cent

of

EM T

echn

olog

y M

anag

emen

t Fun

ding

MISSION SUCCESS AND CHALLENGE

Source Control and Containment(1989-2002)

5.49%

AcceleratedSite Closure(2003-2010)

0.66%

Current(2011-Now)

0.23%

What’s Next? A Big Step Increase?

HOW DO WEENABLE INNOVATION

ANDEXPLOIT THE STATE-

OF-THE-ART?

WHAT IS THE NEXTBIG STEP

INCREASE?

GERALD BOYD, Vice President, Stoller Newport News Nuclear; Member, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on EM Technology Development

MARK GILBERTSON, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Site Restoration, DOE-EM

DR. TERRY MICHALSKE, Director, Savannah River National Laboratory

KEVIN SMITH, Manager, Office of River Protection, DOE-EM

PANELISTS