national center on educational outcomes research on universal design of assessments making...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Research on UniversalDesign of Assessments
Making Assessments Accessibleand Valid for All Students
David MaloufOffice of Special Education
ProgramsU.S. Department of Education
Universal Design of Assessment:
The Whole Elephant
Designing assessments to be inherently accessible and valid for the widest possible range of students.
Universal Design of Assessments
• Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994
• 1997 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001• Upcoming reauthorization of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Series of Federal Laws
• Under Title I, all students were to be included in assessments, public reporting, and accountability.
Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994
• Added requirements for students with disabilities to be included in State and district-wide assessments.
• Introduced alternate assessments• Required public reporting of
aggregated and disaggregated data
Individuals with DisabilitiesEducation Act (1997 reauth.)
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
•Increased assessment demands•Increased requirements for including students with disabilities and students with limited English proficiency
•Accountability for subgroups
From the Regulations for theNo Child Left Behind Act:
§200.2 State responsibilities for assessment
(b) The assessment system required under this section must meet the following requirements:
.......(2) Be designed to be valid and accessible for use by the widest possible range of students, including students with disabilities and students with limited English proficiency.
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special
Education
• Created in 2001 to recommend reforms in America’s special education system
• 13 Public hearings and meetings, plus written input
• Reported in July 2002
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special
EducationRECOMMENDATION—INCORPORATE UNIVERSAL DESIGN IN ACCOUNTABILITY TOOLS: Ensure all tools used to assess students for accountability and the assessment of progress are designed to include any accommodations and modifications for students with disabilities.
Upcoming reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA)
Senate Bill 1248
Universal design. The State educational agency (or, in the case of a districtwide assessment, the local educational agency) shall, to the extent possible, use universal design principles in developing and administering any assessments under this paragraph.
§612(a)(16)(A)(ii)(E)
The pressure is on...
Will we do quick retrofits of tests and called them “universally designed”?Will we simply port tests onto computers and call them “universally designed”?
Inclusive PopulationConstructs designed for accessibility
Accessible items
Amenable to accommodations Simple and clear
instructions and procedures
Maximum readability Maximum legibility
Three Research Projects on Universal Design of Assessment
• “Development Techniques for Universally Designed Assessments”– Sandra Thompson, University of Minnesota
• “Access to Assessment via Technology”– Jacqueline Kearns, University of Kentucky– Bob Dolan, CAST
• “Project MAP (Making Accommodations Personalized”– Gerald Tindal, University of Oregon
Development Techniques for
Universally Designed
AssessmentsNational Center on Educational Outcomes
University of Minnesota
Sandy Thompson
http://education.umn.edu/nceo
3 Studies
•Use “think aloud” to examine student – end user - perspectives
•Analyze items for differences possibly due to design features
•Design training for item/test reviewers
“Think aloud”
•Recently interviewed 90 students using think aloud protocol
•4th and 8th grade•Used multiple choice and constructed response items from state math test
Logistics
• 10 researchers• 5 days• Worked in pairs• All sessions videotaped• Primary accommodations
included oral administration and sign language interpretation
Student Characteristics
Grade 4Grade
8
Learning Disability 10 10
Deaf/Hard of Hearing 10 10
Mild Cognitive Impairment 5 5
English Language Learner 10 10
No Disability 10 10
Overall Observations
• Students who were confident of content did not have problems with design
• Students who had no idea how to solve the problem did not have problems with design
• Students “in the middle” – not sure of content, some reading difficulty, design made a difference
Examples of Student Perceptions
• Many students didn’t see one of the cities on a map
• The name of one of the cities was “Independence” - uncommon meaning
• Box between top and bottom of item – some students did not read entire item
• Sign for parallel gave away the answer• Some students read fraction 3 5/8 as
“35 divided by 8”• Students unfamiliar with settings –
“Glee club does number,” “fitness club”
Other Observations• Some students got a lot of “help” from
sign language interpreters and teachers who wanted to make sure they understood the problem – what happens on test day?
• Some student forms reported need for oral administration when they could clearly read the items independently – are some accommodations inappropriate?
• For English language learners - is oral administration in English an appropriate accommodation on a Math test?
• Should sign language interpreters have a script to follow so they don’t “give away” some answers?
Considerations for Item Review
• Overall appearance is clean and organized
• Clear format for text• Clear format for pictures and
graphics (when essential to item)• Concise and readable text• Format allows for changes without
changing meaning or difficulty• Meets criteria for measuring what it is
intended to measure
Considerations for Test Review
• Meets general criteria for measuring what it is intended to measure
• Overall appearance is clean and organized
• Instructions are necessary, clear, and understandable
• Scoring criteria are appropriate• Others?
Alignment and Usability Need to be Considered Together
AlignmentUsability
Future Plans• Interview students with vision impairments
– Partner with American Printing House for the Blind
• Explore differential item analyses – Partner with researchers from CTB/McGraw-Hill
• Produce short awareness video – Partner with Institute on Community
Integration at University of Minnesota
• Design and pilot training for item reviewers and item developers– Partner with Missouri Department of Education
National Center on Educational Outcomes
Universal Design of Assessment: Applications of Technology
CCSSO National Conference onCCSSO National Conference onLarge-Scale AssessmentLarge-Scale Assessment
June 23, 2003June 23, 2003
Universal Design for Learning (1)
• Universal Design for Learning (UDL) extends the concept of universal design from a physical space to a cognitive space
• Based upon psychological and neuroscientific theories of learning
• Relies on scaffolds, supports, & accommodations which support students’ challenges and thus provide access to learning
• Applies to design and development of goals, methods, assessments, and materials
Universal Design for Learning (2)
• To support individual differences, students must be provided with multiple means of interacting with curriculum– Multiple means of representation– Multiple means of interaction and expression– Multiple means of engagement
• Digital technology is neither necessary nor sufficient for UDL, but it is an enabling factor
Kentucky
• Universal Design for Learning Expert Group• Instructional Technology for Student
Success (ITSS) initiative• Digital Text Network• E-Text Schools program• Senate Bill 243
– Requires any textbook offered for adoption in Kentucky schools be made available by the publisher in an accessible digital format
KY CATS Online Assessment• Web-based, individualized assessment for
qualifying students with disabilities:– Students with IEP or 504 Plan that specifies need for
"reader" as an instructional and assessment accommodation;
– Students who require and routinely use text-reader or screen-reader technologies to access printed material in classroom instruction and assessment;
– Students who have accessed and used the CATS Online Practice Area.
• Based upon success of pilot studies, 16 districts, 31 Schools, & 204 students participated in “live” CATS Online this spring
CATS Online
Maine
• Maine Learning Results emphasize inclusion of diverse students by separating goals and methods
• Maine Comprehensive Assessment System uses variety of state and local components, allowing flexibility and multiple measures of learning to accommodate learner diversity
• State assessment (MEA) tightly aligned with Learning Results
• Actively pursuing UDL as a means for increasing access to general curriculum
Overarching Research Question
How can digital technologies be used to improve accessibility of large-scale assessments in accordance with the principles of Universal Design for Learning?
Research Question 1
What are the practical, procedural, and political design and implementation features of accessible computer-based assessments?
Research Question 2
What technology pre-requisite skills do students need to use computer-based assessments?
Research Question 3
What is the impact of a computer-based universally designed assessment on the scores of students with disabilities?
Research Question 4
To what extent does accessible curriculum design impact student assessment results?
Research Question 5
Can the universally designed assessment design features be replicated with new content in a different state context?
Research Methodology
• Qualitative Studies– Interviews, observations, focus
groups
• Quantitative Studies– Survey, score analysis
• Critical Theory– Constituent reflection
Preliminary Findings To Date
• Interviewed approximately 40 students from 7 schools who took CATS Online
• Most students used the ‘text-to-speech’ feature
• Students liked the independence that the text reader provided, which allowed them to re-read questions multiple times
Features that Promote Accessibility
• Multiple means of representation – Text-to-speech– Font features (e.g. size)– Screen layout options– Textual description of images
• Multiple means of expression and interaction– Word processing– Flexible navigation
Features that Impede Accessibility
• Word processing – requires a set of skills that some students may not have
• Text-to-speech – voice quality and accuracy issues
• Layout issues – poetry, tables, etc.
Preliminary Item AnalysisPositive Exemplars
16. This diagram shows that the beams of light from two flashlights can pass through each other and then continue on unaffected. This observation illustrates which property or properties of light?
A. only particle B. only wave
C. both particle and waveD. neither particle nor wave
Learning Results: H-1, Energy. Students will understand concepts of energy. Students will be able to analyze the evidence that leads scientists to conclude that light behaves somewhat like a wave and somewhat like a particle.
MEA Grade 11Science and Technology
MEA Grade 11Science and Technology
Consider– Explicit reference to image– Redundancy of information between image and text
Scales of JusticeUse the illustration below to answer question 12.
12. “Lady Justice” is a symbol of the United States justice system. As shown in the illustration above, she wears a blindfold and carries a balance scale. Explain how this symbol represents two characteristics of the U.S. justice system.
Consider– Explicit reference to image– Redundancy of information between image and text– Multiple opportunities for response (writing vs. keyboarding)
CATS Grade 8 Social StudiesCATS Grade 8 Social Studies
Preliminary Item AnalysisNegative Exemplars
2. Which of the following is the best estimate of the sum of
Learning Results: B-1, Computation. Students will understand and demonstrate computation skills. Students will be able to use various techniques to approximate solutions, determine the reasonableness of answers, and justify the results.
.√26 + √78?
A. 10 B. 14
C. 52D. 104
MEA Grade 11 MathMEA Grade 11 Math
Consider– Ability of text-to-speech tools to recognize and represent the
square-root symbol– Potential invalidation of item when square-root symbol is
“decoded” by human or digital reader
CATS Grade 8 MathCATS Grade 8 Math
Consider– Transferring of stimulus to paper for response– Use of text-to-speech with image labels– Representation of image to blind students
30. Alex is watering part of his garden with a sprinkler that covers a circular area shown in the diagram below.a. What is the total area of Alex’s garden? Show your work.b. What is the area of the part of the garden that is being watered by the sprinkler? Express your answer to the nearest square foot. Show your work.c. What percent of his garden is being watered by the sprinkler? Express your answer to the nearest percent. Show your work.BE SURE TO LABEL YOUR RESPONSES (a), (b), and (c).
Alex’s Garden
Concerns & Conclusions
• Applying universal design to instruction and assessment: which comes first? (Chicken and egg problem)
• Practical considerations of use of technology e.g. security, scalability, cost
• Need for seamless integration of instructional and assessment technologies to ensure valid, accurate, and fair testing