national board of accreditation · 2019. 7. 25. · ug – cse pg - cst ug – cse 2001 60 120 180...
TRANSCRIPT
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Compliance Report Format
(Tier – II)
Part – A: Institutional Information
(To be filled only once for all programs under consideration)
A1. Name and Address of the college:- Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences
City: Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam
State: Andhra Pradesh, Pin Code:- 531163
Phone: 07330789892, 09866237517
Landline: 08933-225083/84
Fax: 08933-226395
Website: www.anits.edu.in
Email: [email protected]
A2. Year of Establishment: 2001
A3. First Approval Letter No.: F.No:730-50-098(NDEG)/ET/2001 Dated 05-09-2001
A4. Head of the Institution:-
Name: Prof. T. Subrahmanyam
Designation: Principal
Nature of Appt.:Permanent
Phone No: 08933-225085
Mobile: 07330789892, 09866237517
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Fax No: 08933-226395
A5. Name and Address of the Affiliation University:
Name: Andhra University
City: Visakhapatnam
State: Andhra Pradesh
Pin: 530003
Website: https://[email protected]
email: [email protected]
Phone No.: 0891-2844555
Fax No: 0891-2755324
A6. Type of the Institution:-
Institute of National Importance Autonomous
University * Any other (Please specify)
Deemed University
A7. Ownership Status:
Central Government Trust
State Government Society
Government Aided Section 25 Company
Self –financing * Any other (Please specify)
A8. Students Admissions (Institute level considering all UG programs)
Item CAY
2018-19
CAY m1
2017-18
CAY m2
2016-17 Total
Sanctioned intake 1080 1080 1020 3180
Number of students admitted (corresponding to sanctioned intake)
954 1022 950 2926
% of students Admitted over last three assessment years (Total admitted /Sanctioned Intake) = 92.01
A9. Details of the Students actually admitted through Lateral Entry / Separate Division
Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
Number of students admitted through Lateral Entry
199 210 202
Number of students admitted through Separate Division
--- --- ---
Total Number of students admitted in the second year
199 210 202
Note: Provide student details of the second shift (if applicable)
A10. Provide separate Information for each of the program(s) for which compliance is to be submitted
Name of the Department
Name of the program being offered
Name of the program to be considered
Year of start
Intake Increase in intake, if any
Year of increase
AICTE Approval (Initial – Final years)
Accreditation Status*
Computer Science
and Engineering
UG – CSE
PG - CST
UG – CSE 2001 60 120
180
2008
2015
2001-02 to
2018-19
Granted
provisional
accreditation
for three
years
From June,
2016-
June, 2019
Information
Technology
UG - IT UG – IT 2001 60 120
180
2015
2017
2001-02 to
2018-19
Electronics and
Communication
Engineering
UG – ECE
PG - CS
UG – ECE 2001 60 120
180
2005
2014
2001-02 to
2018-19
Electrical and
Electronics
Engineering
UG – EEE
PG - CS
UG - EEE 2001 60 120
180
2009
2014
2001-02 to
2018-19
Mechanical
Engineering
UG – ME
PG - MD
UG - ME 2005 60 120
180
240
2009
2014
2015
2005-06 to
2018-19
PART B- Program Information B1. Name of the Program: Computer Science and Engineering B2. Faculty Information and Contributions
S.
No
Name of the Faculty
PAN No
Qualification
Date of
Joining
Designation
Date on which
designated as
Professor/
Associate
Professor
Currently
Associated
(Y/N)
Date of Leaving
(In case currently
associated NO)
1 Dr.Sivaranjani Reddi AIGPR5151B Ph.D 11.06.2016 Professor 11.06.2016 Y
2 Dr.TusarKanti Mishra AREPM8058R
Ph.D 17.12.2015
Assoc. Prof. 17.12.2015
Y
3 Dr. M. Rama Krishna Murty ANRPM6620N Ph.D 14.11.2017 Assoc. Prof. 14.11.2017 Y
4 Dr. J Hyma ALCPJ5229M
Ph.D 07.06.2018
Assoc. Prof. 07.06.2018
Y
5 S. Ratan Kumar CYZPS9085C
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
10.06.2011
Assoc. Prof. 10.06.2011
Y
6 Mr. Bagadi Ravi Kiran
ALMPR9544H
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
15.12.2010
Sr. Asst. Prof. 15.12.2010
Y
7 Mrs. KavilaSelvaniDeepthi
AUKPK6247M
Ph. D 28.08.2008
Asst. Prof. 28.08.2008
Y
8 Mr. GurralaJagadish
ANXPG8342H
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
24.06.2009
Asst. Prof. 24.06.2009
Y
9 Mrs. GanivadaVenkata
Gayathri
CNFPK9757A
M. Tech 19.10.2009
Asst. Prof. 19.10.2009
Y
10 Mrs. TangillaKranthi
AHKPT1219M
M. Tech 01.06.2010
Asst. Prof. 01.06.2010
Y
11 Mrs. SirikiAchuthaBhavani
EGXPS4566Q
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
02.06.2010
Asst. Prof. 02.06.2010
Y
12 Mrs. Angara Deepthi
ARWPA2918A
M. Tech 14.06.2010
Asst. Prof. 14.06.2010
Resigned
13 Mr. SoumyaRanjan Mishra
BMXPM5690N
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
28.08.2010
Asst. Prof. 28.08.2010
Y
14 Mrs. GorliSanthoshi
CKSPS6114D
M. Tech 01.06.2011
Asst. Prof. 01.06.2011
Y
15 Mr. MandavaKranthi Kiran
BUVPM9169C
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
02.06.2011
Asst. Prof. 02.06.2011
Y
16 Mr. Karri Chandrasekhar
DOYPK9945D
M. Tech 02.06.2011
Asst. Prof. 02.06.2011
Y
17 Mrs. GeddamGowriPushpa
BDEPG6488A
M. Tech 02.06.2011
Asst. Prof. 02.06.2011
Y
18 Mrs. Gadde Pranitha
AQIPG1468L
M. Tech 06.06.2012
Asst. Prof. 06.06.2012
Y
19 Mrs. A.N RatnaLathaKumari
BJSPK5855P
M. Tech 06.06.2012
Asst. Prof. 06.06.2012
Resigned
20 Mr. Seshadri Rao Chinta
AMFPC5528E
M. Tech 03.06.2013
Asst. Prof. 03.06.2013
Y
21 Mr. P. Naga Srinivasu
CHLPP0534L
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
03.06.2013
Asst. Prof. 03.06.2013
Y
22 Mr. Kurumella Suresh
BHXPK4587M
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
06.06.2013
Asst. Prof. 06.06.2013
Y
23 Mrs. RaolePritee Narendra
ASDPP3302M
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
07.01.2014
Asst. Prof. 07.01.2014
Y
24 Ms. Gunupuru Gayathri
AYEPG8676L
M. Tech 04.06.2015
Asst. Prof. 04.06.2015
Y
25 Mr. Vinod Babu P
BAVPP8898R
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
08.06.2015
Asst. Prof. 08.06.2015
Y
26 Ms. L. Keerthi
ACMPL5974G
M. Tech 13.07.2015
Asst. Prof. 13.07.2015
Y
27 Ms.TeedaAnitha
AQBPT8175E
M. Tech 01.06.2016
Asst. Prof. 01.06.2016
Y
28 Mr.Sirasapalli Joshua Johnson ETUPS3688M M. Tech 06.06.2016 Asst. Prof. 06.06.2016 Y
29 Mr.G.V.Eswara Rao
BFAPG9921G
M. Tech 10.06.2016
Asst. Prof. 10.06.2016
Y
30 Ms.VangalaAnusha
AKYPV2353F
M. Tech 13.06.2016
Asst. Prof. 13.06.2016
Y
31 Mrs. S.S.N.L. Priyanka
EZMPS8794G
M. Tech 01.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 01.06.2017
Y
32 Ms. N. Lokeswari
BCFPN519R
M. Tech 01.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 01.06.2017
Y
33 Mr. S. Pratap
FIJPS5629K
M. Tech 01.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 01.06.2017
Y
34 Mrs. Amaravathi K.
BQVPK5406Q
M. Tech 08.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 08.06.2017
Y
35 Mr. Reddy Naidu
BSMPR2537N
M. Tech 10.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 10.06.2017
Y
36 Mrs. A. Naga Ratnam
BPOPA2670E
M. Tech
(Ph.D)
10.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 10.06.2017
Y
37 Mr. G. Sathar
AWLPG6476B
M. Tech 17.06.2017
Asst. Prof. 17.06.2017
Y
38 Mrs. Varanasi Usha Bala
BYQPK2938E
Ph.D 1.05.2016
Asst. Prof. 1.05.2016
Y
39 Mrs.S.V.S.S. Lakshmi
CCDPS9273A
M. Tech 1.05.2016
Asst. Prof. 1.05.2016
Y
40 Mrs. B. Siva Jyothi
BUYPB4597E
M. Tech 10.12.2016
Asst. Prof. 10.12.2016
Y
B.2.1. Student Faculty Ratio (No of Faculty as per the sanctioned intake):-
No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): 1
No. of PG Programs in the Department (m): 1 No. of Students in UG 2
nd Year= u1
No. of Students in UG 3rd
Year= u2 No. of Students in UG 4
th Year= u3
No. of Students in PG 1st Year= P1
No. of Students in PG 2nd
Year= P2 No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + applicable lateral entry, if any (The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the
department) S=Number of Students in the Department = UG1 + UG2 +UG3 +
PG1 + PG2 F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) = S / F
Year
CAY
2018-2019
CAY m1
2017-2018
CAYm2
2016-2017 u1
216 216 216 u2
216 216 144 u3
216 144 144
UG1 648 576 504
p1.1
18 18 18
P2.1 18 18 18
PG1+PG2 36 36 36
Number of Students in the Department (S) 684 612 540
Number of Faculty in the Department (F) 35 39 34
Student Faculty ratio
(SFR) 19.54 15.60 15.88
Average SFR 17.00
B2.2. Faculty Details of the Department (UG+PG):
S.
No
Designation CAY m1
2017-2018
CAY
2018-2019
With Ph.D Without
Ph.D
With Ph.D Without
Ph.D Regular Contractual Regular Contractual
a Professors 2 0 0 1 0 0
b Associate
Professors 2 0 1 3 0 1
c Assistant
Professors 0 0 37 2 0 31
d Total Number
of Faculty in
the
Department
(UG+PG)
4
0
38
6
0
32
B2.3. Faculty Cadre Proportion
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per B2.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply
with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per B2.1 F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply
with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per B2.1
Year Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors
Required Available Required Available Required Available
2018-2019 4 1 7 4 21 30
2017-2018 3 2 6 3 19 34
2016-2017 3 3 6 2 17 29
Average
Numbers 3.33 3 6.33 3 19 31
B2.4. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs
Name of the Faculty Details of Participation (Faculty Development /Training Activities/
STTPs)
2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016 Dr.Sivaranjani Reddi 28th August - 1st
September 2017
14th to 19
th November
2016
Dr.TusarKanti Mishra 13th
to 18th June 2016 -
Dr.M. Rama KrishnaMurty 13th to 27 August 2017
18th to 30
th September
2017
- -
S. Ratan Kumar 12th to 17
th June 2017
5th to 7
th August 2016 1
stto 15
th May 2016,
16th
to 30th May 2016
Mr. Bagadi Ravi Kiran - - -
Mrs. KavilaSelvaniDeepthi 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mr. GurralaJagadish - 20th to 25
th October
2016
-
Mrs. GanivadaVenkata
Gayathri
12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mrs. TangillaKranthi 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mrs. SirikiAchuthaBhavani 13th to 18
th November
2017
13th to 18
th February
2017
-
Mrs. Angara Deepthi 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mr. SoumyaRanjan Mishra - - -
Mrs. GorliSanthoshi 12th to 17
th June 2017 3
rd to 5
th October 2016 16
th to 21
st May 2016
Mr. MandavaKranthi Kiran - - -
Mr. Karri Chandrasekhar 10th to 16
th October 2017 - -
Mrs. GeddamGowriPushpa 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mrs. Gadde Pranitha - - -
Mrs.
A.NookaRatnaLathaKumari
- - -
Mr. Seshadri Rao Chinta 12th to 17
th June 2017,
20th to 26
th November
2017,
22nd
to 24th
MARCH
2018
14th to 18
th December
2016
-
Mr. P. Naga Srinivasu - - -
Mr. Kurumella Suresh 10th to 16
th October 2017 - 16
th to 21
st June,2015
Mrs. RaolePritee Narendra 1st to 10
th July 2017,
15th
to 17th June 2017
19th to 21
st January 2017
23rd
to 25th January 2017 -
Ms. Gunupuru Gayathri 12th to 17
th June 2017,
20th to 26
th November
2017
- 16th
to 21st June,2015
Mr. Vinod Babu P 10th to 16
th October 2017 - 16
th to 21
st June,2015
Ms. L. Keerthi 12th to 17
th June 2017,
13th to 26
th November
2017
- -
Ms.TeedaAnitha 12th to 17
th June 2017
20th to 26
th November
2017
13th to 18
th June 2016 -
Mr.Sirasapalli Joshua
Johnson
12th to 17
th June 2017 13
th to 18
th June 2016
2nd
to 6th January2017
-
Mr.G.V.Eswara Rao - 13th to 18
th June 2016 -
Ms.VangalaAnusha 15TH
to 17th June 17
1st to 10
th July 2017
13th to 18
th June 2016
-
22nd
to 24th
March 2018
14th to 18
th December
2016
8th to 12
th January 2017
Mrs. S.S.N.L. Priyanka 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Ms. N. Lokeswari 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mr. S. Pratap 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mrs. Amaravathi K. 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mr. Reddy Naidu 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mrs. A. Naga Ratnam 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
Mr. G. Satar - - -
Mrs. Varanasi Usha Bala 13th to 18
th November
2017
26th to 31
st July 2016
-
Mrs.S.V.S.S. Lakshmi 12th to 17
th June 2017 13
th to 18
th February
2017
-
Mrs. B. Siva Jyothi 12th to 17
th June 2017 - -
V.Srinivasa Raju - - 16th to 21
st May 2016
Y.A.Sunitha - - 6th to 8
th July 2015
B.Chakradhar Rao - - 16th to 21
st June,2015
K.Ashesh - - 16th to 21
st June,2015
B2.5. Research and Development
Name of the
faculty
Academic Research
Number of quality publications
inrefereed/SCI Journals,
citations,Books/Book Chapters etc.
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded
during the assessment period
whileworking in the institute
As provided in
SAR
After evaluation (till the date of
compliance report)
As provided
in SAR
After evaluation (till the date of
compliance report)
Dr.SivaranjaniReddi 0 5
Dr.TusarKanti Mishra 0 7
Dr.M. Rama KrishnaMurty
- 6 -
Guiding two Ph. D
scholars.
Dr. J Hyma -
S. Ratan Kumar 0 0
Mr. Bagadi Ravi Kiran 7 2
Mrs. KavilaSelvaniDeepthi
4 1
Pursuing Ph.
D Awarded with Ph.D
Mr. GurralaJagadish 6 1
Mrs. GanivadaVenkata
Gayathri 1 2
Mrs. TangillaKranthi 0 1
Mrs. SirikiAchuthaBhavani 2 2
Mrs. Angara Deepthi 0 -
Mr. SoumyaRanjan Mishra 1 2
Mrs. GorliSanthoshi 2 3
Mr. MandavaKranthi Kiran 1 1
Mr. Karri Chandrasekhar 0 1
Mrs. GeddamGowriPushpa 2 2
Mrs. Gadde Pranitha 3 0
Mrs.
A.NookaRatnaLathaKumari 2 0
Mr. Seshadri Rao Chinta 1 1
Mr. P. Naga Srinivasu 2 2
Mr. Kurumella Suresh 0 0
Mrs. RaolePritee Narendra
16 4
Ms. Gunupuru Gayathri 0 3
Mr. Vinod Babu P 0 2
Ms. L. Keerthi 0 0
Ms.TeedaAnitha 0 2
Mr.Sirasapalli Joshua Johnson 0 0
Mr.G.V.Eswara Rao 0 1
Ms.VangalaAnusha 0 0
Mrs. S.S.N.L. Priyanka - 2
Ms. N. Lokeswari - 2
Mr. S. Pratap - 1
Mrs. Amaravathi K. - 2
Mr. Reddy Naidu - 0
Mrs. A. Naga Ratnam - 3
Mr. G. Sathar - 1
Mrs. Varanasi Usha Bala - 1 - Awarded with Ph.D
Mrs.S.V.S.S. Lakshmi 0 2
Mrs. B. Siva Jyothi - 2
Dr.SC Satapathy 34 -
Dr. KVSVN Raju 0 0
S. Jayaprada 2 -
J. Sharmila 1 1
V. Srinivasa Raju 0 -
P. Deepika 2 -
D. Ashwani 1 -
K. Ashish 0 -
B2.6. Sponsored Research/Consultancy (B) Details as provided in the SAR previously
Name of
the faculty
Project
Title
Project
Type
Research/
Consultancy
Funding
Agency Amount Duration
Dr. Suresh
Chandra
Satapathy
An Efficient Fault
Management System for
Distributed Computing
Research AICTE-RPS 5,75,000/- 3 years
K.S.Deepthi
An Efficient Fault
Management System for
Distributed Computing
Research AICTE-RPS 5,75,000/- 3 Years
(II) Details after evaluation (till the date of Compliance Report)
Name of
the faculty
Project
Title
Project
Type
Research/Co
nsultancy
Funding
Agency Amount Duration
Dr. Suresh
Chandra
Satapathy
An Efficient Fault
Management System for
Distributed Computing
Research AICTE-RPS 5,75,000/- Fund not
released.
K.S.Deepthi
An Efficient Fault
Management System for
Distributed Computing
Research AICTE-RPS 5,75,000/- Fund not
released.
B.3. Students’ Performance Student Intake Table
Item
(Information to be provided
cumulatively for all shifts with explicit
headings wherever applicable)
2018-
2019
2017-
2018
2016-
2017 2015-2016
Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 180 180 180 180
Total number of students admitted in
first year minus number of students
migrated from other programs/
institutions plus number of students
migrated to this program
180 180 180 178
Number of students admitted in 2nd
year
in the same batch via lateral entry (N2) - 30 24 36
Separate division students, if applicable
(N3) - - - -
Total number of students admitted in the
Program
(N1 + N2 + N3)
180 210 204 214
Academic Performance Table
Year of Entry
N1+N2+N3
(As Defined
Above)
Number of Students who have successfully graduated
I year II Year III Year IV Year
2018-2019 180 - - - -
2017-2018 210 137 - - -
2016-2017 204 143 159 - -
2015-2016 214 134 148 162 -
2014-2015 144 78 58 54 54
2013-2014 133 75 72 72 69
2012-2013 144 80 73 70 70
B3.1. Success rate without backlog in stipulated period SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program without backlog in the stipulated period
of course duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd
year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Item
Latest Year of
Graduation, LYG
2017-2018
Latest Year of
Graduation minus 1,
LYGm1
2016-2017
Latest Year of
Graduation minus
2, LYGm2
2015-2016
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year +
admitted in 2
nd year via lateral entry
and separate division, if applicable
144 133 144
Number of students who have graduated without backlogs in the
stipulated period 54
69 70
Success Index (SI) 0.39 0.51 0.48
Average Success Index 0.46
B3.2. Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program with backlog in the stipulated period of
course duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd
year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Item LYG (CAYm4)
2017-2018 LYGm1(CAYm5)
2016-2017 LYGm2 CAYm6)
2015-2016
Number of studentsadmitted in
thecorrespondingYear + admitted in2nd
year via lateral
entry and separatedivision, if applicable
144 133 144
Number of studentswho have
graduatedwith backlogs in the
stipulated period
104
104 106
Success Index (SI) 0.72 0.78 0.73
Average Success Index 0.74
B3.3. First Year Academic Performance
Academic Performance = ((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students
on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful
students/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the
examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the second year.
Academic Performance CAY m1
2017-2018
CAY m2
2016-2017
Cay m3
2015-2016
Mean of CGPA or Mean
Percentage
of all successful students (X)
8.15 8.19 8.02
Total no. of successful students (Y)
137 143 134
Total no. of students appeared in
the
examination (Z)
176 180 178
API = x* (Y/Z)
6.35 6.5 6.02
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 +
AP3)/3
6.29
B3.4. Academic Performance in Second Year
API = ((Mean of 2nd
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point
scale)or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x
(number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful
students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.
Academic Performance CAY m1
2017-2018
CAY m2
2016-2017
Cay m3
2015-2016
Mean of CGPA or Mean
Percentage of all successfulstudents
(X)
8.8 7.86 7.17
Total no. of successful students (Y)
159 148 102
Total no. of students appeared in
the examination (Z)
208 214 144
API = x* (Y/Z)
6.68 5.42 5.02
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 +
AP3)/3 5.70
B3.5. Academic Performance in Third Year
API = ((Mean of 3rd
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale)
or (Mean of thepercentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number
of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year. Academic Performance CAY m1
2017-2018
CAY m2
2016-2017
Cay m3
2015-2016
Mean of CGPA or Mean
Percentage of all
successfulstudents (X)
7.56 7.22 7.51
Total no. of successful students
(Y)
162 92 110
Total no. of students appeared in
the examination (Z)
214 144 133
API = x* (Y/Z)
5.67 4.54 6.2
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 +
AP3)/3
5.47
B3.6.Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship
Item
CAYm1
2017-2018
CAYm2
2016-2017
CAYm3
2015-2016
Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 137 133 144
No. of students placed in companies or Government
Sector (x) 61 82 114
No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid
qualifyingscores (GATE or equivalent State or
National Level Tests, GRE,GMAT etc.) (y)
3 3 2
No. of students turned entrepreneur in
engineering/technology (z) 1 0 0
x + y + z = 65 85 116
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 0.47 0.63 0.80
Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.63
PART C. Criterion wise Compliance Status
S.No Criteria Observations made by
NBA
(During the last
accreditation visit)
Compliance Status
(Actions taken by the institution)
1 Vision, Mission &PEOs
1.1 Formulation
1.1
State the vision and
Mission of the
Department and
Institute
Department vision
statement Does not reflect
Computer Science&
engineering
Revised Vision of CSE :
Our vision is to emerge as a world
class Computer Science and
Engineering department through
strong Research and excellent
teaching environment that responds
swiftly to the challenges of changing
computer science technology and
addresses technological needs of the
stakeholders.
The revision is with effect from
12.6.2017
1.2 Dissemination
1.3
Indicate where and
how the vision,
Mission and PEOs are
published and
disseminated among
stakeholders
Lacks in meaningful
dissemination among the
stake holders.
The Vision, Mission statements,
PEOs are properly disseminated
amongst all stakeholders in many
ways. Few of them are listed here:
i. Hardcopies of academic
regulations are distributed to
the students and their
parents/guardians during
orientation meet in first year.
ii. During alumni meet
conducted in every year, last
alumni meet is conducted on
23rd
December 2017.
iii. During national symposium
conducted by the department,
last dates of symposiums are
2nd
and 3rd
march 2017, 22nd
and 23rd
February 2018.
iv. They are also published
amongst all stakeholders in
the following ways;
Displayed in Institute
Website
(http://cse.anits.edu.in/)
Displayed in all classrooms
and laboratories.
Displayed on all notice
boards
1.4
State the process for
defining vision and
mission of the
department and PEOs
of the program
Stakeholders involvement is
not visible
The involvement of stakeholders are
made visible by following the below
measures:
i. Hardcopies of academic
regulations are distributed to
the students and their
parents/guardians during
orientation meet in first year
and their inputs are taken.
ii. During alumni meet conducted
every year, last alumni meet is
conducted on 23rd
December
2017 and their inputs are
taken.
iii. During parents meet conducted
once in a year.
1.3 Assessment NIL -
1.4 Any other
observations made by
the NBA
NIL -
2 Course Outcomes and
Program Outcomes
2.1 Formulation NIL -
2.2 Mapping
3.1
Establish the
correlation between
the courses and the
POs and PSOs
Improvement Needed The following measures are taken to
improve the mapping of COs and
POs
i) The POs are revised reflecting
Graduate attributes.
ii) The COs are reframed in
reference to Blooms taxonomy.
iii) CO-PO mapping tables are
revised with in lieu with the
above two points.
2.3 Assessment
3.2.2
Record the attainment
of course outcomes of
all courses with
respect to set
attainment levels
Direct assessment tools
have been used, however
design needs improvement
The assessment of CO attainment is
calculated using two components
1. Internal examination
2. External examination
The internal examination includes
i) Mid term examination
ii) Assignment
iii) Case study/Quizzes
The external examination includes
i) The marks scored by the
student in the external exam.
The design is changed
incorporating these components in
a tool which is accessed by the
following link
http://10.0.34.135/nba/login.php
3.3.2
Provide results of
evaluation of each PO
and PSO
Attainment level is
moderate, process being
reanalysed
The APMC committee conducts
meeting once in a year to assess the
PO and PSO attainment and also
fixes the attainment levels for the
next academic year.
2.4 Any other
observations made by
NBA
NIL -
3 Curriculum Design, if Applicable
2.1.1 State the process to identify extent of compliance of the university curriculum for attaining the PO & PSOs, mention the identified curricular
New curriculum adopted
with autonomous status, no
records of meeting
assessing program
i) Inputs are taken from Alumni,
graduating students and faculty
on POs and PSOs.
ii) The APMC committee conducts
meeting once in a year to assess
the PO and PSO attainment.
iii) The curriculum is approved by
BOS and Academic council.
The following is the list of dates of
BOS Meeting:
20th
June 2015
26th
March 2016
25th
March 2017
28th
April 2018
2.1.2
State the delivery
details of the content
beyond syllabus for
the attainment of POs
and PSOs
New curriculum adopted
with autonomous status, no
records of meeting
assessing program
The following measures are taken
1. Guest lectures and workshops are
conducted to cover the topics
beyond the syllabus like Android
App development, VLSI Design,
Digital Marketing , competitive
coding classes, etc.
2.2.1
Describe the process
followed to improve
quality of teaching
learning
Diploma to degree students
are entering system much
later after the
commencement of semester,
Teacher student interaction
required
Extra classes are being conducted to
the lateral entry students before the
commencement of mid1 term
examination.
2.2.2
Quality of internal
semester question
papers, assignment
Suitable records of CO
coverage by questions not
shown.
Every question in the internal
examination including assignments
are mapped to COs and is reflected
in the mid-term exam question paper.
and evaluation The question paper is sent to subject
experts within the department for
quality assessment of the mapping.
2.2.3
Quality of student
projects
Coverage of topics, certain
areas are not covered in
projects, published papers
do not have DoI,
complicated allocation
system
The project allocation is modified
and made simple with effect from
12.6.2017.
Students select their projects based
on different criterion namely;
Student’s interest in a particular
domain.
Latest trends in technology
Last few years, the following
domains have been selected by
majority students for final semester
projects.
a. Software Engineering
b. Data Mining
c. Image Processing
d. Artificial Intelligence
e. Cryptography and Network
Security
It is made mandatory to publish the
final year project work in journals
from the academic year 2018-2019.
2.2.4
Initiatives related to
industry interaction
Industry supported labs are
not visible, formal record of
analysis not maintained.
Two labs are established with the
support from two companies Sales
Force Ltd that trains students to
customize ERP solutions and Texas
Instruments Ltd that helps students to
build IoT related projects.
2.2.5
Initiatives related to
industry internship/
summer training
Post training assessment is
not properly recorded.
An external examination is
conducted for 100 marks to access
the quality of summer internship
program.
4. Any other observations made by the NBA during their last visit
Criteria No Remarks made by NBA Action taken by institute
5.5
Innovations by
the faculty in
Teaching and
Learning
Not visible, peer review
required access to intranet
e-learning portal is created and placed in the
college website (www.anits.edu.in) to facilitate
the upload of the course materials are for easy
access to students.
5.7.1
Academic
Research
Relatively small fraction of
publications have DoI
Faculty are motivated to publish more research
papers in highly indexed journals and
conferences. Publication count is significantly
increased and 68 papers have been published
in last two years.
5.7.2
Sponsored
Research
Only I project of very small
amount, funding is not yet
received after 3 years of
sanction
More than four proposals (includes Seminar
grants, MODROBS and RPS) were submitted
to AICTE/DST etc.,
Funds not yet received.
5.8
Faculty
Performance
Appraisal and
Development
System
Performance appraisal is not
sensitive to research
achievements, quality is
limited by nature of appraisal
system
The faculty appraisal form is revised. Research
parameter is given significant importance in
the revised appraisal form. Faculty has to
secure a definite API score to get the annual
increment.
6.1
Adequate and
well equipped
laboratories and
technical
manpower
Adequate labs and support
staff exist, equipment’s are
old
A new lab (Open Source Tools lab) with 37
computer systems is set up with advanced
system configuration.
A new lab with 100 computer systems is
setup at the institute level with advanced
system configuration to conduct
competitive coding activities to students
and train them to be industry ready.
6.2
Laboratories:
Maintenance
and overall
ambience
Ambience Needs
improvement
All class rooms are equipped with mount
roofed LCD projectors.
Other observations made by the NBA Committee during their last visit
Cadre ratio, Professor, associate professor,
PhD Faculty
Initiatives are taken to increase the cadre ratio. In
this regard the following actions are taken:
i) Recruited two associate professors with PhD
one in Academic year 2017-2018 and other in
2018-2019.
ii) Faculty are encourages to complete PHD. In
this process two faculty members are awarded
with PhD in 2018-2019 and four faculty
members have submitted the thesis and
awaiting for result.
New equipment required, class room and
laboratory ambience need improvement/
new computers and equipment / software
required in labs/ class room and laboratory
ambience need substantial improvement.
To increase the ambience of the class rooms and
laboratories in the department, the following
actions are taken:
i) A new lab (Open Source Tools lab) with 37
computer systems is set up with advanced
system configuration.
ii) All class rooms are equipped with mount roofed
LCD projectors.
iii) A new lab with 100 computer systems is setup
at the institute level with advanced system
configuration to conduct competitive coding
activities to students and train them to be
industry ready.
Implement of OBE needs introspection.
Awareness on Outcome Based Education is
conducted to the faculty in the department through
regular faculty meetings which discusses the
importance of achieving the outcomes of the
course. In this regard the following actions are
taken:
i) To improve the academic performance of the
student, it is decided to conduct remedial
classes every Saturday to help students to
understand the concept better and clear the
course.
ii) e-learning portal is created and placed in the
college website (www.anits.edu.in) to
facilitate the upload of the course materials
are for easy access to students.
iii) The assessment of OBE is done twice in a
year or once in each semester. The
assessment tool used by the department is
provided in the link below
http://10.0.34.135/nba/login.php
The CO assessment of a particular course is
calculated by combining the internal
assessment and external assessment scores.
The internal assessment scores is calculated
by combining the scores attained by the
student for each mapped course outcome in
mid exams, assignments, case study/quizzes
conducted in the e-learning platform. The
external assessment scores is calculated by
combining the scores attained by the student
for each mapped course outcome for the
answer attempted in the external exam.
Research, consultancy, publication quality
need substantial improvement.
More than four proposals (includes Seminar
grants, MODROBS and RPS) were
submitted to AICTE/DST etc.,
Faculty are motivated to publish more
research papers in highly indexed journals
and conferences. Publication count is
significantly increased 68 papers have been
published in last two years.
Teaching beyond curriculum needs efforts,
students need encouragement to do industry
projects.
Efforts are placed by the faculty members to fill
the gaps in the curriculum/ individual courses
wherever necessary. The following actions are
taken:
i) Apart from the regular schedule, coding
classes are conducted to 3rd
and 2nd
year
students on every Saturday to increase the
coding skills and motivate them to
participate in national events like
hackathons, coding competitions, national
symposiums (conducted in IITs/NITs).
ii) Competitive coding classes are also
conducted to 2nd
year students on Saturdays
to increase their coding skills.
iii) Infosys campus Connect programme is
conducted in the department for an entire
semester to 3rd
year students.
iv) Advanced workshops are conducted though
APSSDC on Android development.
v) Workshops on Ethical hacking, Digital
Marketing, VLSI design are also conducted
to the students of the department.
vi) Faculty after attending the
Workshops/FDPs/STTPs outside the college
share the knowledge to the students by
conducting seminars.
vii) CSI chapter conducted guest lectures, mock
parliament event and quizzes to the students
in order to enhance their co-curricular skills.
viii) It is mandatory for the students to do industry
internship for a duration of 45 days after
completion of 3rd
year.
ix) Students are encouraged to do industry
internships in their final year and the
internship work is considered as the project
work. The initiatives taken by the department
to fill in the gap in the curriculum made it
advantage for the student to do industry
internships every year. 60 students are doing
internships in industry for the academic year
2018-2019.
Faculty members need outside exposure and
need to attend STTP/FDP at NITs/IITs.
Faculty members are encouraged to participate in
FDPs/STTPs at IITs, NITs, Universities and other
reputed institutions. The following is the list of
faculty interaction/ participation in the outside
world
i) 80% of the faculty have attended the FDPs in
IITs/ NITs and FDPs conducted by NITs in
various institutes in academic year 2018-2019
and 60% in 2017-2018.
ii) Faculty are motivated to do nptel
certification courses that are recognized as
FDPs and also in course era, edx., etc.
iii) 5 Faculty members have delivered guest
lectures outside the college and most of the
faculty became the reviewers to various
journals and conferences.
Research oriented projects are not visible.
Faculty motivated the students to develop
models using IoT during their project time.
Students are motivated to do the projects in
contemplating areas like machine learning.
IoT, Fuzzy Neural, Semantic Analytics,
Security etc.
Motivated the students to publish a paper of
their project work.
