national acs poster

1
Photolytic Breakdown of Trace Level Pharmaceuticals in the Environment S.A. Kindelberger 1 , J.M. Conley 2 , S.M. Richards 2 ,S.J. Symes 1 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, TN 37403 1 Department of Chemistry, 2 Department of Environmental Science Experimental Introduction The fate of both prescription and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals in the environment are largely unknown. Previous studies have shown that these compounds may be present in watershed concentrations high enough to have detrimental biological effects. Current waste water treatment methods are not designed to break down these small organic molecules. Since up to 90% of these compounds can be excreted unchanged by humans, the potential exists for a continuing source of environmental replenishment. It may be that photolytic breakdown is an important mechanism of degradation in the environmental fate of these compounds. Although previous studies have investigated breakdown phenomena in single drug systems, more complex degradation interactions may exist in multi-component systems that have not been evaluated. This study was designed to investigate the possibility of photolytic breakdown in a 13 drug mixture. Acknowledgements References Conclusions Three parent solutions(10μg/mL) were made by solvating each target drug(~10mg) in 50% Type I H2O(Millipore)/50% acetonitrile(Fisher Scientific, Optima grade). Solutions were stirred under dark conditions for 12 hours at 22°C and further diluted with same solvent to experimental concentrations(100ng/mL). Working solutions were filtered(0.22 microns) and placed in 125mL clear borosilicate reactor cells(Fisher Scientific) with a transmission range ~700-280nm. Exposed cells received approximately 8 hours/day of direct and 4 hours/day of indirect unfiltered sunlight in early spring 2008 (Southern TN at approx.35.07°N, 85.27°W, elev.659ft) with a mean temperature of 12.8°C (min=- 2.8°C,max=24.4°C). Solutions were sampled at 0, +6, +12, +24, +36, +48, +60, +120 hours and normalized to refrigerated (3°C) unexposed solutions originating from the same parent dilution. Chromatographic separation and detection utilized a Waters UPLC coupled with a Quattro micro triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operated in ESI+ mode. Data shown (Fig.1) represent the mean of background corrected triplicate injections of individual reactors at each sampling interval. Although 3 drugs show considerable breakdown, most demonstrate significant persistence after 120 hrs of environmental exposure. Analytes were classified into 3 categories based on their aquatic persistence. Drugs showing >90% of original concentrations were determined to be “persistent”, while those showing 20-90% were classified as “slow degrading”. Analytes demonstrating less than 20% of initial concentrations were designated “fast degrading”. The solvent system chosen for this experiment was chosen, in part, based on solubility issues of less polar analytes such as atorvastatin and lovastatin. Drugs in aqueous environmental matrices may exhibit different photolytic responses due effects not accounted for in this experiment, such as possible photolytic quenching by dissolved organic matter (DOM). Less polar drugs may undergo adsorption processes to sediment due to lack of solubility in aqueous conditions. Future work will include more realistic environmental conditions and the possible effects they may contribute to the fate of pharmaceuticals. Results UTC Grote Fund Provost Student Research Award Dr. Robert Mebane National Science Foundation 2005 prescription data and rankings from www.rxlist.com Halling-Sorensen et al. (1998) CHEMOSPHERE, 36, 357-393 Kolpin et al. (2002) Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1202- 1211 Pomati et al. (2006) Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2442- 2447 HN O N OH OH OH O F Atorvastatin Trade Name: Lipitor Susceptibility: Fast- Degrading N NH 2 O Carbamazepine Trade Name: Tegretol Susceptibility: Persistent N O OH O N F NH Ciprofloxacin Trade Name: Cipro Susceptibility: Fast- Degrading N CH 3 H O F F F Fluoxetine Trade Name: Prozac Susceptibility: Persistent OH NH O CH 3 Acetaminophen Trade Name: Tylenol Susceptibility: Persistent N N H 3 C N N O CH 3 O CH 3 Caffeine Trade Name: n/a Susceptibility: Persistent O N H 3 C CH 3 S H N NH CH 3 N + O - O Ranitidine Trade Name: Zantac Susceptibility: Fast- Degrading N S N CH 3 H 3 C O O CH 3 O OCH 3 Diltiazem Trade Name: Cardizem Susceptibility: Persistent N F OH O O O CH 3 N N CH 3 Levofloxacin Trade Name: Levaquin Susceptibility: Slow- Degrading Cl Cl NH CH 3 Sertraline Trade Name: Zoloft Susceptibility: Persistent Trimethoprim Trade Name: Triprim Susceptibility: Persistent N N NH 2 H 2 N H 3 CO OCH 3 OCH 3 Sulfamethoxazole Trade Name: Gantanol Susceptibility: Slow Degrading S O O H N N O CH 3 H 2 N Lovastatin Trade Name: Mevacor Susceptibility: Persistent CH 3 CH 3 O CH 3 O H O H H CH 3 CH 3 O 0 6 12 24 36 48 60 120 0 25 50 75 100 Levofloxacin R anitidine C iprofloxacin PercentD rug R em aining Carbam azepine Tim e Elapsed (hours) Fig.1 Analyte breakdown over a 120 hour period. Data selected to illustrate 3 categories of persistence. See Table 2 for complete results. Table 1 D rug C ategory U .S.N um berof Prescriptions (2005) A cetam inophen analgesic O ver-the-Counter C affeine stimulant O ver-the-Counter R anitidine H 2 histam ine blocker O ver-the-Counter Trim ethoprim Anti-infective --- Levofloxacin Anti-infective 14,235,000 C iprofloxacin Anti-infective 13,280,000 Sulfam ethoxazole Anti-infective --- D iltiazem Calcium channel blocker 2,045,000 C arbam azepine Anti-convulsant 2,284,000 Sertraline SSRI 26,976,000 Fluoxetine SSRI 21,403,000 Lovastatin Anti hyperlipidem ic --- A torvastatin Anti hyperlipidem ic 63,219,000 Photolytic Susceptibility % A nalyte rem aining at120hrs R anitidine fast-degrading 0.2% A torvastatin fast-degrading 9.9% C iprofloxacin fast-degrading 3.0% Levofloxacin slow -degrading 43% Sulfam ethoxazole slow -degrading 56% Lovastatin slow -degrading 89% C arbam azepine persistent 97% Sertraline persistent 100% Fluoxetine persistent 100% A cetam inophen persistent 100% C affeine persistent 100% Trim ethoprim persistent 100% D iltiazem persistent 100% Table 2

Upload: scott-kindelberger

Post on 13-Apr-2017

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: National ACS Poster

Photolytic Breakdown of Trace Level Pharmaceuticals in the EnvironmentS.A. Kindelberger1, J.M. Conley2, S.M. Richards2,S.J. Symes1

University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanooga, TN 37403

1Department of Chemistry, 2Department of Environmental Science

Experimental

IntroductionThe fate of both prescription and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals in the environment are largely unknown. Previous studies have shown that these compounds may be present in watershed concentrations high enough to have detrimental biological effects. Current waste water treatment methods are not designed to break down these small organic molecules. Since up to 90% of these compounds can be excreted unchanged by humans, the potential exists for a continuing source of environmental replenishment. It may be that photolytic breakdown is an important mechanism of degradation in the environmental fate of these compounds. Although previous studies have investigated breakdown phenomena in single drug systems, more complex degradation interactions may exist in multi-component systems that have not been evaluated. This study was designed to investigate the possibility of photolytic breakdown in a 13 drug mixture.

Acknowledgements

References

Conclusions

Three parent solutions(10μg/mL) were made by solvating each target drug(~10mg) in 50% Type I H2O(Millipore)/50% acetonitrile(Fisher Scientific, Optima grade). Solutions were stirred under dark conditions for 12 hours at 22°C and further diluted with same solvent to experimental concentrations(100ng/mL). Working solutions were filtered(0.22 microns) and placed in 125mL clear borosilicate reactor cells(Fisher Scientific) with a transmission range ~700-280nm. Exposed cells received approximately 8 hours/day of direct and 4 hours/day of indirect unfiltered sunlight in early spring 2008 (Southern TN at approx.35.07°N, 85.27°W, elev.659ft) with a mean temperature of 12.8°C (min=-2.8°C,max=24.4°C). Solutions were sampled at 0, +6, +12, +24, +36, +48, +60, +120 hours and normalized to refrigerated (3°C) unexposed solutions originating from the same parent dilution. Chromatographic separation and detection utilized a Waters UPLC coupled with a Quattro micro triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operated in ESI+ mode. Data shown (Fig.1) represent the mean of background corrected triplicate injections of individual reactors at each sampling interval.

Although 3 drugs show considerable breakdown, most demonstrate significant persistence after 120 hrs of environmental exposure. Analytes were classified into 3 categories based on their aquatic persistence. Drugs showing >90% of original concentrations were determined to be “persistent”, while those showing 20-90% were classified as “slow degrading”. Analytes demonstrating less than 20% of initial concentrations were designated “fast degrading”. The solvent system chosen for this experiment was chosen, in part, based on solubility issues of less polar analytes such as atorvastatin and lovastatin. Drugs in aqueous environmental matrices may exhibit different photolytic responses due effects not accounted for in this experiment, such as possible photolytic quenching by dissolved organic matter (DOM). Less polar drugs may undergo adsorption processes to sediment due to lack of solubility in aqueous conditions. Future work will include more realistic environmental conditions and the possible effects they may contribute to the fate of pharmaceuticals.

Results

•UTC Grote Fund•Provost Student Research Award•Dr. Robert Mebane•National Science Foundation

2005 prescription data and rankings from www.rxlist.comHalling-Sorensen et al. (1998) CHEMOSPHERE, 36, 357-393Kolpin et al. (2002) Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1202-1211Pomati et al. (2006) Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2442-2447

HN

O

N OH

OH OH O

F

AtorvastatinTrade Name: LipitorSusceptibility: Fast-Degrading

N

NH2 O

CarbamazepineTrade Name: TegretolSusceptibility: Persistent

N

O

OH

O

N

F

NH

CiprofloxacinTrade Name: CiproSusceptibility: Fast-Degrading

N

CH3

HO

FF

F

FluoxetineTrade Name: ProzacSusceptibility: Persistent

OH

NH

O

CH3

AcetaminophenTrade Name: TylenolSusceptibility: Persistent

N

N

H3C

N

N

O

CH3

O

CH3

CaffeineTrade Name: n/aSusceptibility: Persistent

O

NH3C

CH3

S

HN NH

CH3

N+O-

O

RanitidineTrade Name: ZantacSusceptibility: Fast-Degrading

N

S

N

CH3

H3C

O

O

CH3

O

OCH3

DiltiazemTrade Name: CardizemSusceptibility: Persistent

N

FOH

OO

OCH3

N

N

CH3

LevofloxacinTrade Name: LevaquinSusceptibility: Slow-Degrading

Cl

Cl

NH

CH3

SertralineTrade Name: ZoloftSusceptibility: Persistent

TrimethoprimTrade Name: TriprimSusceptibility: Persistent

N

N

NH2

H2N

H3CO OCH3

OCH3

SulfamethoxazoleTrade Name: GantanolSusceptibility: Slow Degrading

S

O

O

HN

NO

CH3

H2N

LovastatinTrade Name: MevacorSusceptibility: Persistent

CH3

CH3

O

CH3 O H

O

H

HCH3

CH3 O

0 6 1224

3648

60120

0

25

50

75

100

LevofloxacinRanitidine

Ciprofloxacin

Per

cent

Dru

g R

emai

ning

Carbamazepine

Time Elapsed(hours)

Fig.1Analyte breakdown over a 120 hour period. Data selected to illustrate 3 categories of persistence. See Table 2 for complete results.

Table 1 Drug Category U.S. Number of Prescriptions (2005)Acetaminophen analgesic Over-the-Counter

Caffeine stimulant Over-the-CounterRanitidine H2 histamine blocker Over-the-Counter

Trimethoprim Anti-infective ---Levofloxacin Anti-infective 14,235,000

Ciprofloxacin Anti-infective 13,280,000Sulfamethoxazole Anti-infective ---

Diltiazem Calcium channel blocker 2,045,000Carbamazepine Anti-convulsant 2,284,000

Sertraline SSRI 26,976,000Fluoxetine SSRI 21,403,000Lovastatin Anti hyperlipidemic ---

Atorvastatin Anti hyperlipidemic 63,219,000

Photolytic Susceptibility % Analyte remaining at 120hrsRanitidine fast-degrading 0.2%

Atorvastatin fast-degrading 9.9%Ciprofloxacin fast-degrading 3.0%Levofloxacin slow-degrading 43%

Sulfamethoxazole slow-degrading 56%Lovastatin slow-degrading 89%

Carbamazepine persistent 97%Sertraline persistent 100%

Fluoxetine persistent 100%Acetaminophen persistent 100%

Caffeine persistent 100%Trimethoprim persistent 100%

Diltiazem persistent 100%

Table 2